<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AiM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3402</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2024.142008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AiM-131026</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium Strains Responsible of Bovine Tuberculosis Cases in Bobo-Dioulasso Slaughterhouse, Burkina Faso
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mariétou</surname><given-names>Konate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aminata</surname><given-names>Fofana<sup>#</sup></given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yacouba</surname><given-names>Kouadima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aboubacar</surname><given-names>Sidiki Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Sanou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Mycobact&amp;amp;eacute;riologie, Centre MURAZ, Institut National de Sant&amp;amp;eacute; Publique, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>UFR/Sciences et Techniques, Universit&amp;amp;eacute; Catholique de l’Afrique de l’Ouest, Unit&amp;amp;eacute; Universitaire &amp;amp;agrave; Bobo (UCAO/UUB), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departement Biom&amp;amp;eacute;dical et Sant&amp;amp;eacute; Publique (BioMed/SP), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sant&amp;amp;eacute; (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Centre de Recherche en Sciences Biologiques, Alimentaires et Nutritionnelles (CRSBAN), Universit&amp;amp;eacute; Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Departement de Biochimie-Microbiologie, UFR Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Universit&amp;amp;eacute; Nazi BONI, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is an endemic zoonosis significantly affects animal health in Burkina Faso. The primary causative agent is 
  Mycobacterium tuberculosis (
  M. tuberculosis) complex, mainly 
  M. bovis. Cattle are considered as natural reservoir of 
  M. bovis. However, in Burkina Faso, the circulation of these strains remains poorly understood and documented. This study aimed to identify and characterize 
  Mycobacterium strains from suspected carcasses during routine meat inspection at Bobo-Dioulasso refrigerated slaughterhouse. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2021 to December 2022 on cases of seizures linked to suspected bovine tuberculosis. Microbiological and molecular analyzes were used for mycobacterial strain isolation and characterization. Out of 50 samples, 24% tested positive by microscopy and 12% by culture. Molecular analysis identified 6 strains of Mycobacteria, exclusively 
  Mycobacterium bovis specifically the subspecies 
  bovis (
  Mycobacterium bovis subsp 
  bovis). In conclusion, 
  M. bovis subsp 
  bovis is the primary agent responsible for bovine tuberculosis in Bobo-Dioulasso. Continuous monitoring of mycobacterial strains is therefore necessary for the effective control of this pathology in the local cattle population.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bovine Tuberculosis</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Mycobacterium bovis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Molecular Identification</kwd><kwd> Cattle Population</kwd><kwd> Burkina Faso</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>Abstract</title><p>Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is an endemic zoonosis significantly affects animal health in Burkina Faso. The primary causative agent is Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) complex, mainly M. bovis. Cattle are considered as natural reservoir of M. bovis. However, in Burkina Faso, the circulation of these strains remains poorly understood and documented. This study aimed to identify and characterize Mycobacterium strains from suspected carcasses during routine meat inspection at Bobo-Dioulasso refrigerated slaughterhouse. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2021 to December 2022 on cases of seizures linked to suspected bovine tuberculosis. Microbiological and molecular analyzes were used for mycobacterial strain isolation and characterization. Out of 50 samples, 24% tested positive by microscopy and 12% by culture. Molecular analysis identified 6 strains of Mycobacteria, exclusively Mycobacterium bovis specifically the subspecies bovis (Mycobacterium bovis subsp bovis). In conclusion, M. bovis subsp bovis is the primary agent responsible for bovine tuberculosis in Bobo-Dioulasso. Continuous monitoring of mycobacterial strains is therefore necessary for the effective control of this pathology in the local cattle population.</p><p>Keywords:</p><p>Bovine Tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis, Molecular Identification, Cattle Population, Burkina Faso</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a highly contagious disease affecting both humans and animal. The causative agent is Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), belongs to the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBc), which also includes various species such as M. tuberculosis, M. africanum, M. microti, M. canettii, M. caprae, M. pinnipedii and M. mungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref1">1</xref>] . Infections with atypical opportunists or saprophytes mycobacteria are capable to interfere with bTB screening or diagnosis through false-positive interpretations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref2">2</xref>] . The main reservoir of M. bovis is cattle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref3">3</xref>] . However, wild species such as wild boars, African buffaloes, or deer, among others can be contaminated by cattle which can also infect them during close contact, thus maintaining the epidemiological cycle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref4">4</xref>] . In developing countries, infection control in animals and the lack of systematic dairy products pasteurization increase the risks of transmission to humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref4">4</xref>] . In Burkina Faso, as in most developing countries, the disease remains a concern despite the implementation of control measures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref5">5</xref>] . Bovine tuberculosis impacts (bTB) occupies an important place in term of public health and economic. Approximately 10% of cases recorded in the human population were due to zoonotic transmission globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref6">6</xref>] . In addition, the World Health Organization attributed 143,000 cases of dental tuberculosis to M. bovis worldwide in 2018 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref3">3</xref>] . However, molecular epidemiology in endemic areas of sub-Saharan Africa is not sufficiently known to implement surveillance approaches to better understand local dynamics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref7">7</xref>] . Burkina Faso is a landlocked country with more than 70% of its population living in rural areas. The country’s economy is mainly based on agriculture and livestock, which makes it particularly vulnerable to zoonotic diseases. Statistics from the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal, and Fisheries Resources indicated that in 2022, Burkina Faso had 9,720,615 cattle, 11,129,114 sheep, 10,750,406 goats, 1,416,342 pigs, 1,509,159 donkeys, 166,289 horses, 28,365 camels, and 35,803,843 poultry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref8">8</xref>] . The close daily proximity of humans to these animals increases the risk of disease transmission, occurring through direct contact with infected animals. In fact, humans become infected through direct contact with infected animals or through consumption of contaminated meat and unpasteurized milk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref3">3</xref>] . Although Burkina Faso notifies the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) every year of the presence of bTB in the country, the lack of comprehensive data prevents an accurate assessment of the prevalence and hinders understanding the incidence of human TB due to M. bovis, as well as the economic burden of the disease beyond slaughterhouse seizures. To date, there is very little data on the molecular and cultural characteristics of M. bovis in Burkina Faso. The available information does not cover the entire territory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref10">10</xref>] . The study aims to address this gap by characterizing MTBc isolates from carcasses of slaughtered cattle suspected of TB at the Bobo-Dioulasso Refrigerated slaughterhouse.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>We conducted a prospective cross sectional study at the refrigerated slaughterhouse in Bobo-Dioulasso located in the Houet province, Hauts-Bassins region of Burkina Faso between January 2021 and December 2022. The samples were collected with the approval of Regional Animal Resources Direction. The selection of Bobo-Dioulasso as the study site was based on several factors, including the frequency of bTB frequency cases, the geographic accessibility and the overall security situation in the country. The samples collected were transported according to the cold chain protocols to maintain their quality during transit. The subsequent analyses were performed at the Mycobacteriology Laboratory of Centre MURAZ. Throughout the study period, only bovine organs and meat seized under suspicion TB by veterinary services were considered for microscopic, microbiological and molecular analyses. The biological material was mainly composed of lymph nodes and nodules which presented lesions suggestive of TB as identified during routine inspection. Samples were individually collected in sterile tubes and accompanied by a collection sheet developed for the study providing essential contextual information.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>2.2. Sample Size</title><p>We carried out an exhaustive census focusing all seizure including carcass and different organs inspected for macroscopic bTB lesions during the study period.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>2.3. Samples Collection</title><p>Following a routine meat inspection at slaughterhouse, the study focused on the carcasses seized from slaughtered cattle declared unfit for consumption due to bTB suspicion. The inspection involved thorough examination of the entire carcass, evaluating its overall condition, including color and presence of abnormal shapes. Additionally, scrutinizing target organs, particularly lungs, and all others, searching for lesions suggestive of TB, such as nodules or abscesses. Samples were extrated from tissues of lymph nodes, lungs, liver, kidneys and muscles from carcasses with suspected bTB lesions. A sterile scalpel was used to make an incision in the suspected part/area. Each collected sample, approximately 70 g in size was placed in a labeled sterile tube, then placed in a cooler maintained at +4˚C and transported to the laboratory for further analyses. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> in the study illustrates some of the collected samples from cattle with bTB lesions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>2.4. Sample Preparation and Analysis</title><p>Once in the laboratory, the samples were processed using different techniques such as decontamination, microscopy, culture and molecular identification following the standard methods used at the Centre Muraz Mycobacteriology Laboratory.</p><sec id="s3_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Decontamination</title><p>Decontamination was carried out using protocol described by Sanou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref9">9</xref>] . Samples were cut into small pieces and then cleaned with sterile distilled water. The nodular parts on the tissue fragments were finely ground in a sterile mortar containing sterile sea sand. The ground material was then recovered in 10 ml of sterile distilled water. The suspension liquid obtained was collected in a first 50 ml Falcon tube and allowed to decant for 5 minutes. Two (2) ml of the supernatant was then transferred into a second 50 ml Falcon tube for the decontamination step according to the PETROFF method.</p><p>During the first decontamination step, 10 ml of NaOH was added to the 2 ml of the collected supernatant and homogenized vigorously for 30 seconds by vortexing, then for 20 minutes using a Kahn shaker. The suspension obtained was supplemented with sterile distilled water until an average volume of 45 ml was obtained and homogenized again by vortexing for 30 seconds. After this series of agitations, the suspension was centrifuged successively three times at a rate of 3000 revolutions per minute for 20 minutes. After the last centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and 1.5 ml of sterile distilled water was added to the pellet. The whole was vortexed until a homogeneous mixture was obtained, ready for bascilloscopy and seeding.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Microscopy</title><p>On a previously identified and cleaned slide, a drop of the homogenized centrifugation pellet was spread and dried at room temperature. Smear was fixed to the Bunsen burner flame for approximately 4 seconds, five times in a row while keeping the spread turned upwards. The fixed smears were then stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen heat method. The reading was made using an optical microscope (100 objective and immersion oil). A standard optical microscope with a 100&#215; objective under immersion oil was used for microscopic examination.</p><p>Results were recorded as positive or negative smears. Positive smears were characterized by the presence of Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) during the reading and graded as +/−, +, ++, or +++, depending on sample bacillary load. Any absence of AFB was considered as negative smear. A bTB case was defined by at least one smear positive for AFB at microscopic examination. A bTB negative one was defined by the absence of AFB in all the smears of a sample.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Isolation of Germs</title><p>The pellet obtained after decontamination was double inoculated on the Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture medium using a glycerinated tube and a non- glycerinated one which, was also supplemented with pyruvate (0.5%). To do this, a volume of 0.2 ml of the homogenized pellet was used to inoculate three different tubes, two containing the glycerinated (LJ) medium, and one containing non-glycerinated (LJ) medium was supplemented with 0.5% pyruvate. The seeded tubes were then incubated at 37˚C in an incubator for 90 days. The cultures were observed on the third day of incubation to ensure that there was no contamination, then successively on days 7, 21, 28, 42, 60 and 90 to check the growth of mycobacteria.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_4"><title>2.4.4. Identification of Mycobacteria Isolates</title><p>Identification of mycobacteria was carried out using the Genotype Mycobacteria MBTC kit (Hain Life-science GmbH, Nehren, Germany) and according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For DNA extraction, 1 to 2 colonies were collected from a solid medium culture and suspended in 100 μl of lysis buffer (A-LYS). The suspension was then incubated at 95˚C for 5 min then centrifuged at 10,000 &#215;g for 15 min at 37˚C. The supernatant was discarded and the resulting pellet was suspended in 100 μl of neutralization buffer (A-NB), vortexed for 5 minutes. and the mixture obtained was centrifuged for 5 minutes and stored at 4˚C before carrying out the PCR. PCR was carried out using 45 &#181;L of two mixtures (AM-A, AM-B) provided with the GenoTypeMTBDC kit, and 5 &#181;L of the heat-inactivated suspension giving a final volume of 50 &#181;L for amplification. The details of the mix composition and the primers sequences are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The amplification</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> AM-A and AM-B amplification mixture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Reagents</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reaction Volume</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1&#215;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13&#215;</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AM-A Solution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 μl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130 μl</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AM-B Solution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 μl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >455 μl</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>protocol included 15 min of denaturation at 95˚C, followed by 10 cycles including 30 s at 95˚C and 2 min at 65˚C. A phase of 20 additional cycles including 25 s at 95˚C, 40 s at 50˚C and 40 s at 70˚C, and a final extension at 70˚C for 8 min was then carried out.</p><p>Hybridization and detection were performed using a wash and shake device (TwinCubator). The program was started by putting 20 &#181;L amplification products added to 20 &#181;L of denaturing reagent (provided with the kit) into separate cuvettes of a plastic well and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. One (1) ml of pre-warmed hybridization buffer was then added, followed by stopping to drop a strip into each well. The hybridization procedure was carried out at 45˚C for 30 min, followed by adding a strip into each well. The hybridization procedure was carried out at 45˚C for 30 min, followed by two washing steps. For revelation, hybridized amplicons for revelation, hybridized amplicons, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin, and substrate buffer were added. In the final wash, the strips were air dried and fixed on paper.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>Data was entered using Excel 2016 software. Descriptive analysis was used to present the results due to the low number of positive bTB cases.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>3.1. Prevalence and Location of Tuberculosis Lesions</title><p>In total, 10,641 cattle carcasses were examined during our study. Among them, 50 exhibited lesions suspicious for TB, resulting in a prevalence of 0.47% (50/10,641) with a confidence interval of [0.37% - 0.57%].</p><p>Upon stratifying the carcasses by gender/sex, it was observed that 49% (n = 19) of the cases with suspected TB lesion were females while 40% (n = 20) were males. The gender of the remaining 11 carcasses was not provided. The male/ female sex ratio was estimated at 1.05 (20/19), suggesting a relatively balanced distribution of the suspected TB lesions between male and female cattle. Among the carcasses with suspicious lesions, the majority 48% (n = 24) exhibited lesions in the lungs, followed by 34% (n = 17) with lesion in the lymph nodes, and 10% (n = 5) with lesions in the breasts (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>3.2. Microscopic Analysis of bTB Suspected Cases</title><p>In the microscopic analysis revealed that 24% (n = 12) of the samples tested positive for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) compared to 76% who tested negative (n = 38) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>3.3. Isolation and Identification of Mycobacteria Species</title><p>Among the total samples cultured (n = 50), 12% (n = 6) yielded positive results, with 86% (n = 43) testing negative, and 2% (n = 1) being contaminated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Within the samples that tested positive by culture, 4 were also positive by</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Organs seized frequency for TBb suspicion</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Organ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intestines</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Udders</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lungs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Microscopic analysis result of samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Microscopic result</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Result of Mycobacteria growth on LJ media</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Culture result</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contamination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>microscopy while 2 were negative. The obtained mycobacteria isolates (n = 6) were identified using the “Genotype Mycobacteria MBTC” test as the M. bovis species subspecies bovis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The objective of this study was to contribute to data collection on the identification of M. bovis species from lesions originating in cattle slaughtered at the Bobo-Dioulasso abattoir. A prevalence of 0.47% was observed among the 10,641 inspected carcasses, which is lower than the prevalence reported in previous studies carried out in the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref10">10</xref>] and elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref11">11</xref>] (2.6%, 2.7%, 4.3% respectively) thus confirming a geographic variation in bTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref12">12</xref>] . This variation could be explained by resistance of the Zebu breed in cattle to bTB infections or to the animal production system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref11">11</xref>] . The study showed that tuberculosis lesions were much more localized in the lungs compared to the other organs seized. This localization is attributed to the tropism of mycobacteria which often prefer the lungs before spreading to other parts of the animal organism. Aerosols particularly from sputum, constitute the most important source of contagion and mainly come from sputum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Microscopic examination of the lesions showed the presence of AFB in 24% of cases. Culture identified positive isolates in 16% of bTB lesions with M. bovis as the only species isolated. These results are consistent with those of previous studies which confirm the circulation of M. bovis among cattle slaughtered in Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref10">10</xref>] . However, a much higher positivity rate of 54% for microscopic detection of M. bovis was reported by Kanyala et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref7">7</xref>] . The lower positivity rate in our study could be explained by incorrect diagnosis of tuberculosis lesions, the influence of decontamination and culture growth conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref13">13</xref>] . Furthermore, the detection of bTB cases by veterinary services suggests the surveillance of the disease, posing a growing threat in Burkina Faso. It’s noteworthy that smear-positive samples can be negative in culture due to low viability of some bacilli. In contrast, smear-negative samples can be positive in culture because of the high sensitivity of culture compared to smear microscopy. In this study, no presence of M. tuberculosis was detected, however, its presence/ occurrence has been reported in cattle and humans in some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131026-ref14">14</xref>] thus implying a potential risk of zoonotic tuberculosis.</p><p>It’s essential to acknowledge certain limitations, including the restricted analysis to samples based on tuberculosis lesions at the slaughterhouses, limting a comprehensive estimate of bTB prevalence in Burkina Faso. Furthermore, the exclusive inclusion of slaughtered cattle might bias the overall prevalence rate of Mycobacterium strains in the city’s animal population. The low rate of positive samples also hindered the feasibility of statistical analysis, and the absence of reported information on sex and age by veterinary service agents limited the exploration of these parameters reflecting the study population. Therefore, a need for further research and monitoring is necessary to improve our understanding of bTB dynamics in Burkina Faso.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study reveals that Mycobacteria strains were isolated from tuberculosis lesions from cattle carcasses seized due to suspected bTB. Through microbiological and molecular analyses made it possible to identify Mycobacterium bovis ssp bovis was identified as the causative agent of bTB. Despite a relatively low frequency rate, the identification of the M. bovis strain suggests circulation of this pathogen in the cattle population of cattle slaughtered at the Bobo-Dioulasso slaughterhouse. This reinforces the significance of genuine public health issue linked to exposure to this pathogen. This study therefore suggests a continuous and in-depth molecular and bacteriological surveillance of mycobacterial strains contributing to the development and effective TbB control strategies in Burkina Faso.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Regional and provincial directorates of Animal and Fishery Resources in the Hauts-Bassin regions as well as the various agents stationed at the Bobo- Dioulasso refrigerated slaughterhouse, at the Institute of Science and Technology (INSTechs) and at the Centre MURAZ.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>There is no conflict of interest between the authors.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Konate, M., Fofana, A., Kouadima, Y., Ouattara, A.S. and Sanou, A. (2024) Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium Strains Responsible of Bovine Tuberculosis Cases in BoboDioulasso Slaughterhouse, Burkina Faso. Advances in Microbiology, 14, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2024.142008</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131026-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Organisation for Animal Health (2019). Zoonotic Tuberculosis in Mammals, Including Bovine and Caprine Tuberculosis. Organiza&amp;atilde;o Mundial de Sa&amp;uacute;de Animal (OIE). 1-20. https://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rivi&amp;egrave;re, J. and Riviere, M.J. (2016) Evaluation du dispositif de surveillance de la tuberculose bovine dans la faune sauvage en France &amp;agrave; l’aide de m&amp;eacute;thodes &amp;eacute;pid&amp;eacute;miologique, &amp;eacute;conomique et sociologique. https://theses.hal.science/tel-01362997/document</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thoen, C., LoBue, P. and de Kantor, I. (2006) The Importance of Mycobacterium bovis as a Zoonosis. Veterinary Microbiology, 112, 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boussini, H., Traor&amp;eacute;, A., Tamboura, H.H., Bessin, R., Boly, H. and Ou&amp;eacute;draogo, A. (2012) Prevalence de la fuberculoseef de la brucellose dans les elevages bovins laifiers infra-urbains efperiurbains de la ville d’Ouagadougou au Burkina Faso. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 31, 943-951. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.31.3.2168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dibaba, A.B., Daborn, C.J., Cadmus, S. and Michel, A. (2019) Tuberculosis in Animals: An African Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18690-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carruth, L., Roess, A.A., Mekonnen, Y.T., Melaku, S.K., Nichter, M. and Salman, M. (2016) Zoonotic Tuberculosis in Africa: Challenges and Ways Forward. Lancet, 388, 2460-2461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32186-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kanyala, E., Shuaib, Y.A., Schwarz, N.G., Andres, S., Richter, E., Sawadogo, B., et al. (2022) Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Mycobacterium bovis in Slaughtered Cattle Carcasses in Burkina Faso; West Africa. Microorganisms, 10, 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071378</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DCRP/MARAH (2022) Premi&amp;egrave;re enqu&amp;ecirc;te nationale sur le cheptel (ENC1): Les r&amp;eacute;sultats valid&amp;eacute;s. https://www.agriculture.bf/jcms/pv10_104263/fr/premiere-enquete-nationale-sur-le-cheptel-enc1-les-resultats-valides</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanou, A., Dicko, A., Sow, K.R., Djibougou, A., Kabore, A., Diarra, B., et al. (2021) Epidemiology and Microscopic Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Pigs and Small Ruminants Slaughtered at Bobo-Dioulasso Abattoir, Burkina Faso. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 88, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v88i1.1908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tialla, D. and Ouedraogo, A. (2021) Tuberculose bovine et cons&amp;eacute;quences associ&amp;eacute;es dans la commune rurale de Tanghin-Dassouri au Burkina Faso. Science et Technique, Sciences de la Sant&amp;eacute;, 44, 19-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ejo, M., Haile, B., Tariku, T., Nigatu, S., Kebede, E., Bitew, A.B., et al. (2021) Bacteriological and Molecular Characterization of Mycobacterium bovis Isolates from Tuberculous Lesions Collected among Slaughtered Cattle, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Microbiology, 21, Article No. 286. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02349-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sibhat, B., Asmare, K., Demissie, K., Ayelet, G., Ameni, G., Dawa, D., et al. (2018) Bovine Tuberculosis in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 147, 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.09.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nuru, A., Zewude, A., Mohammed, T., Wondale, B., Teshome, L., Getahun, M., et al. (2017) Nontuberculosis Mycobacteria Are the Major Causes of Tuberculosis Like Lesions in Cattle Slaughtered at Bahir Dar Abattoir, Northwestern Ethiopia. BMC Veterinary Research, 13, Article No. 237. https://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12917-017-1168-3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1168-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131026-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarnagda, Z., Kanyala, E., Zingu&amp;eacute;, D., Sidib&amp;eacute;, S., Yougbar&amp;eacute;, I., M&amp;eacute;da, T.K.N., et al. (2014) Prevalence of Tuberculosis spp. Species in Bovine Carcasses in Two Slaughterhouses of Burkina Faso. International Journal of Microbiology and Immunology Research, 2, 92-100.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>