<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2024.121004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-130937</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Preliminary Study of Chemical Elements Distribution in Petroleum Source Rocks Donga and Yogou Formations of the Termit Sedimentary Basin (Est-Niger)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alassane</surname><given-names>Ibrahim Maman Bachir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulaye</surname><given-names>Dan Makaou Oumarou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baraou</surname><given-names>Idi Souley</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouakou</surname><given-names>Alponse Yaou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulwahid</surname><given-names>Sani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Fossil Energy, University of Agadez (UAZ), Agadez, Niger</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Civil Engineering, Geosciences and Geographic Sciences Laboratory, Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphou&amp;amp;#235;t Boigny (INP-HB), Yamoussoukro, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Geology, University of Agadez (UAZ), Agadez, Niger</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>62</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  XRF and EDX analyses were carried out on 18 batches of representative raw samples to determine the distribution of major chemical elements in the petroleum source rocks of Donga and Yogou formations of Termit sedimentary basin. The chemical composition of these formations is dominated by silicon (Si), aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe). This is consistent with the oxide composition, which is also dominated by silicon oxide (SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>) and iron monoxide (FeO). No less important chemical elements are calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba), as well as some of their oxides. All these major chemical elements are carried by silicate detrital minerals associated with pyrite and goethite and/or clay minerals such as kaolinite and interstratified illite, smectite and chlorite. This trend is illustrated by the values of the Si/Al and SiO
  <sub>2</sub>/Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub> ratios.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Distribution</kwd><kwd> Major Elements</kwd><kwd> Source Rocks</kwd><kwd> Donga Formation</kwd><kwd> Yogou Formation</kwd><kwd> Termit Basin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The distribution of chemical elements in the lithosphere is linked to the geological processes (magmatism, metamorphism, hydrothermalism and sedimentary processes) that led to the formation of the rocks and minerals that are their essential constituents. The combined effects of these geological processes govern the systematic distribution in various geological environments or natural systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref1">1</xref>] . Thus, the relative abundance of chemical elements proposed by chemists and mineralogists, in particular [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref2">2</xref>] , reflects the geochemical processes occurring within or at the earth’s surface. These geochemical processes allow chemical elements to be a useful geochemical tracer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref6">6</xref>] . The coexistence of these chemical elements in terrestrial materials (rocks and minerals) results from certain affinities between these elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref8">8</xref>] . In the case of petroleum sedimentary rocks such as those of Donga and Yogou (Termit Basin, Niger), these affinities often reflect the conditions under which the rocks were formed: transport, deposition and diagenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref13">13</xref>] . Petroleum source rocks in the Donga and Yogou formations have been subjected to a summary mineralogical characterization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] , but without addressing the way in which chemical elements are distributed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Samples Analyzed</title><p>The samples analyzed were those of petroleum source rocks from the Donga and Yogou formations of the Termit sedimentary basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). They were collected in collaboration with the Centre de Documentation et d’Archives P&#233;troli&#232;res du Niger (CDP). They include cuttings from the Koul&#233;l&#233;-1D, Fana-1, Helit-1, Melek-1 and Ounissoui-E1 wells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Sampling was carried out with a 10-meter sampling step.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><p>Rock cuttings samples were washed to remove drilling mud. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) were applied to determine the composition of major chemical elements in these samples.</p><p>XRF was performed using a portable Niton XL3t<sup>&#174;</sup> XRF spectrometer, coupled with a computer to ensure data transfer after analysis using Niton Data Transfer (NDT) software. Measurements in All-Geo mode were carried out on an accessory fitted with a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip, enabling the analyzer to detect it automatically and convert it into a benchtop analyzer. Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) were used to study the crystalline form of minerals using digital images, and to determine the major chemical elements and oxide composition of the samples analyzed.</p><p>The tool used is a D.C.A.R. Variable Pressure SEM/EDS (MEB FEG Supra 40 VP Zeiss), equipped with an X-ray detector (OXFORD Instruments X-Max 20) connected to an EDS microanalyzer platform (Inca Dry Cool, without liquid nitrogen).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Chemical Composition of the Donga Formation</title><p>The results of the distribution of major chemical elements in the Donga formation are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. They include silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba).</p><p>Elements Mg, Mn and Ba have very low proportions, averaging no more than 0.5% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The elements K, S and Ti have low average proportions of 3.99%, 2.65% and 2.07% respectively. Ca has a relatively low average value of 5.37%, with the highest value in sample PO.E2.Dg (13.82%).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Elemental composition of major chemical elements in the Donga formation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elements Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Si</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Si/Al</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PM.E6.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PH.E7.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E22.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF.E20.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E20.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF.E21.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PO.E2.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the histogram of the different proportions of major chemical elements in the Donga formation. The Donga formation is relatively rich in silicon, aluminum and iron (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), with average proportions of 49.49%, 17.79% and 17.45% respectively. The highest proportions of these elements are found in samples PK.E22.Dg (56.77%), PF.E21.Dg (22.03%) and PF.E20.Dg (20.09%) respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Chemical Composition of the Yogou Formation</title><p>The major chemical elements present in the Yogou formation are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. They are composed of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and barium (Ba).</p><p>The elements Si, Al and Fe (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) are the most abundant in the Yogou formation. Their average proportions are 57.77%, 16.17% and 15.57% respectively. The highest proportions of these chemical elements are found in samples PF.E11.Yg (63.29%), PK.E26.Yg (17.52%) and PK.E26.Yg (19.29%) respectively.</p><p>Elements Ca, K, S and Ti have low proportions, averaging 1.82%, 3.57%, 1.81% and 2.42% respectively. The element K has the highest value in sample PH.E42.Yg (5.02%). The other three chemical elements, Mg, Mn and Ba, are in very low proportions, averaging no more than 0.7% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the histogram of the different proportions of major elements in the Yogou formation. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows that silicon is the most abundant chemical element in the Yogou formation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Si/Al Chemical Element Ratios in the Donga and Yogou Formations</title><p>The Si/Al ratios presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> range from 2.16 to 3.76, with an average of 2.80 for the Donga samples, and from 3.01 to 4.09, with an average</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Elemental composition of major chemical elements in the Yogou formation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elements Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Si</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Si/Al</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E25.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PH.E42.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PM.E1.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF.E11.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PM.E2.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF.E10.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E26.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>of 3.60 for the Yogou samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the histogram of Si/Al atomic ratios of major chemical elements for the Donga formation in green and the Yogou formation in orange.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Identifying the Major Element and Oxide Composition of Donga and Yogou</title><p>Images and corresponding energy dispersive spectra of samples from the Donga and Yogou formations are shown in Figures 5-8.</p><p>The majority of element peaks in the EDS spectra, such as silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti) and sulfur (S), are common elements observed with XRF.</p><p>The elements gold (Au) and carbon (C) are taken from the sample support grid during analysis. The main chemical elements identified using energy dispersive spectrometry are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, and the oxides in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0.</p><sec id="s3_4_1"><title>3.4.1 Major Chemical Elements</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the proportions of major chemical elements in the EDS analysis of the Donga and Yogou samples.</p><p>Magnesium (Mg The chemical elements Si, Al and Fe are the most abundant, with average proportions of 19.08%, 11.10% and 5.02% respectively in the Donga</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Major chemical elements in EDS analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elements Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Si</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Si/Al</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#201;chant.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Weight %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ratio</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E20.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E21.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E26.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PM.E1.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>formation, and 21.07%, 8.24% and 4.1% in the Yogou formation. They are followed by Ca with 2.09% and K with 1.54% for Donga. In the Yogou formation, these chemical elements have 1.05% and 1.94% respectively. The chemical elements Ti, Mg, S and Na are in very low proportions, averaging no more than 1% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Si/Al ratios are 1.58 and 1.88 for the Donga formation and 2.32 and 2.83 for the Yogou formation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> shows the histogram of the different proportions of major chemical elements obtained by EDS analysis in the Donga and Yogou formations.</p><p>This figure shows the abundance of the elements Si, Al and Fe in both formations.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_2"><title>3.4.2. Oxides in the Donga and Yogou Formations</title><p>The proportion of oxides contained in rocks from the Donga and Yogou formations is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. These oxides include silicon oxide (SiO<sub>2</sub>), aluminum (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), iron (FeO), potassium (K<sub>2</sub>O), titanium (TiO<sub>2</sub>), calcium (CaO), magnesium (MgO), sodium (Na<sub>2</sub>O) and sulfur (SO<sub>3</sub>).</p><p>Analysis of this table shows that SiO<sub>2</sub> is the most abundant oxide, with an average proportion of 40.82% for Donga and 46.45% for Yogou (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). It is followed by Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. The average proportion of this element is 19.25% for Donga and 15.06% for Yogou. It is therefore less abundant in the latter formation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). FeO oxide is also moderately abundant in these formations. These average proportions are 6.46% and 7.27% respectively in the Donga and Yogou formations. The proportions of other oxides are, in order of abundance, K<sub>2</sub>O (2.85% and 3.34%), MgO (1.62% and 1.74%), SO<sub>3</sub> (2.65% and 1.03%), Ti<sub>2</sub>O (0.49% and 0.82%) and Na<sub>2</sub>O (0.35% and 0.16) in the Donga and Yogou formations.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 shows the histogram of oxide proportions obtained by EDS analysis on samples from the Donga (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a)) and Yogou (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(b)) formations. Analysis of this figure also shows the abundant proportions of the following oxides: SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and FeO in both formations. These results are in agreement with the proportions of major elements obtained by XRF and EDS analyses.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 shows the histogram of the different values of the ratio of major chemical elements and oxides obtained by EDS analysis of samples from the Donga and Yogou formations.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Oxides from EDS analysis of Donga and Yogou samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Elements Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FeO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3 </sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Weight %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ratio</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E20.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E21.Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PK.E26.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PM.E1.Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Dg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Yg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.08</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Major Chemical Elements in the Donga and Yogou Formations</title><p>The abundance of major elements such as silicon, aluminum and iron in the samples from Donga and Yogou formations revealed by XRF analysis is attributable to the presence of detrital minerals in these samples. Furthermore, the high proportion of Fe in these formations is either due to the presence of pyrite and goethite, or to substitutions in the octahedral and tetrahedral structures of Al<sup>3+</sup> by Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Si<sup>4+</sup> by Al<sup>3+</sup> or Fe<sup>3+</sup> respectively in the clay material. These observations concerning the presence of non-silicates minerals iron-rich, notably pyrite and goethite, are in line with the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] . Also, the presence of relatively high levels of the elements K and Ca is probably due to these substitutions. This could result in a slight charge deficit in the structure, which can be compensated for by these modifier cations (interfoliar) in the tetrahedral and octahedral sites as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref16">16</xref>] . In addition, the uniform distribution of Fe and Mg elements on clay particles can be interpreted as the result of substitution of these elements in the clay crystal lattice and during the deposition of nanocrystalline grains of associated minerals such as pyrite, goethite as revealed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Also, the average Ti, K and K<sub>2</sub>O contents, with an average of 3.99% and 3.57% by weight for Ti, 2.07% and 2.42% by weight for K and 2.85% and 3.34% by weight for K<sub>2</sub>O respectively for the Donga and Yogou formations, are relatively high. This suggests that the presence of titanium (Ti) in these formations is either linked to the crystalline networks of the clay minerals, or originates from detrital materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref17">17</xref>] and confirmed by the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] on the mineralogical characterization of the Donga and Yogou formations.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Oxides in the Donga and Yogou Formations</title><p>The works of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref19">19</xref>] has shown that Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> contents are respectively proportional to the presence of clays and silicate detrital materials such as quartz. In this study, SiO<sub>2</sub> is abundant in the Yogou formation, while Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is abundant in the Donga formation. This distribution characterizes a predominance of clay minerals in the Donga formation and is probably explained by the presence of sandy lenses in the Yogou formation, constituting Upper Cretaceous reservoirs in the Termit sedimentary basin, as described in the works of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref23">23</xref>] in the same Termit sedimentary basin.</p><p>Iron oxide (FeO) is also an important component in the Donga and Yogou formations, averaging 6.46% and 7.27% by weight respectively. This iron oxide (FeO) has known preferential associations with iron sulfides such as pyrite and marcasite. Mineralogical examination by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] confirmed that the extent of iron concentration generally coincides with the presence of pyrite in these formations.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Influence of Si/Al and SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Ratios and Donga and Yogou Oxides</title><p>The Al/Si ratios, which vary from 0.27 to 0.46 with an average of 0.35 for the Donga formation and from 0.2 to 0.33 with an average of 0.28 for the Yogou formation, are respectively low (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), suggesting according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref18">18</xref>] that Si in most sediments is associated with silicates and clay minerals. According to previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref24">24</xref>] , the SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ratio values in the Donga and Yogou formations belong to the range of SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ratio values for 2:1 type clays (2Si and 1Al which is 2 to 4) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref26">26</xref>] . These ratios are significantly higher than those of standard kaolinite (ranging from 1.73 to 1.8) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref26">26</xref>] . This may be due to the presence of siliceous minerals, particularly quartz, in the rocks of the Donga and Yogou formations, as shown by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>The abundance of silicon and aluminum on the one hand, and the relatively high Si/Al ratios on the other, provided by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, confirm a clay, quartz and muscovite enrichment of the rocks in these formations, as noted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] . The high iron content is linked to the presence of pyrite in samples from the Donga and Yogou formations. Then, the relatively high contents of chemical elements such as S, Ti, Mg, Mn, and also Fe, Ca, and K is due to the presence of accessory minerals such as garnet, siderite, goethite and anatase in the Donga formation and sericite, anatase and goethite in the Yogou formation and pyrite and muscovite in these two formations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>In addition to the high Si/Al ratios, the K and Ca element contents are probably due to substitutions in the octahedral and tetrahedral structures of Al<sup>3+</sup> by Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Si<sup>4+</sup> by Al<sup>3+</sup> or Fe<sup>3+</sup> respectively. The results of mineralogical analysis of clay fractions from the Donga and Yogou formations obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] reveal the presence of interstratified clay minerals such that illite, smectite and chlorite type. Si/Al ratio values between 1 and 3, obtained by EDS analysis, indicate the predominance of kaolinite, 2:1 clays such as smectite and illite and siliceous minerals as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130937-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The distribution of chemical elements in petroleum source rocks of Donga and Yogou formations of the Termit sedimentary basin (Niger), shows that Fe, Si and Al are the most abundant elements. The major chemical element compositions of the samples analyzed are controlled mainly by clay minerals rather than by non-clay silicate minerals. This trend is illustrated by the values of the Si/Al ratios, although the proportion of silicate minerals is not negligible. The main oxides (SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and FeO) identified by this study are unevenly distributed throughout the formations. The predominance of SiO<sub>2</sub> and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> confirms the presence of quartz and clay minerals, as does the XRF analysis.</p><p>The major chemical elements identified in the Donga and Yogou formations are borne by minerals such as pyrite, goethite, clays, quartz, muscovite, siderite, anatase and garnet.</p><p>Finally, the Donga and Yogou formations are dominated by clays and contain silicate minerals associated with pyrite and goethite, while the clay fractions of these rocks are dominated by kaolinite and interbedded minerals such as illite, smectite and chlorite types.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to express their sincere and honest gratitude to the Centre de Documentation et d’Archives P&#233;troli&#232;res du Niger (CDP).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bachir, A.I.M., Oumarou, A.D.M., Souley, B.I., Yaou, K.A. and Sani, A. (2024) Preliminary Study of Chemical Elements Distribution in Petroleum Source Rocks Donga and Yogou Formations of the Termit Sedimentary Basin (Est-Niger). Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 12, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2024.121004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130937-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, P., et al. (2015) Evaluating Rare Earth Elements as a Proxy for Oil-Source Correlation. A Case Study from Aer Sag, Erlian Basin, Northern China. Organic Geochemistry, 87, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y., et al. (2018) Trace and Rare Earth Element Geochemistry of Crude Oils and Their Coexisting Water from the Jiyuan Area of the Ordos Basin, N China. Geological Journal, 53, 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.2897</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakada, R., Takahashi, Y., Zheng, G., Yamamoto, Y. and Shimizu, H. (2010) Abundances of Rare Earth Elements in Crude Oils and Their Partitions in Water. Geochemical Journal, 44, 411-418. https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.1.0083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mani, D., Ratnam, B., Kalpana, M.S., Patil, D.J. and Dayal, A.M. (2016) Elemental and Organic Geochemistry of Gondwana Sediments from the Krishna-Godavari Basin, India. Geochemistry, 76, 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2016.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramirez-Caro, D. (2013) Rare Earth Elements (REE) as Geochemical Clues to Reconstruct Hydrocarbon Generation History. Master Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. https://krex.k-state.edu/handle/2097/16871</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dreyfus, S. (2006) Détermination directe des éléments traces (Ni, V, Cu, Mo, Sn, Ba, Pb) et de leurs rapports isotopiques dans les huiles brutes par ICP/MS.Définition de nouveaux traceurs géochimiques et application à l’étude du système pétrolier du bassin de Portiguar (Brésil). Doctorat Thesis, Université de Pau, Pau. http://www.theses.fr/2006PAUU3039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Craigie, N. (2018) Principles of Elemental Chemostratigraphy: A Practical User Guide. In: Swennen, R. and Leuven, K.U., Eds., Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration &amp; Production, Springer International Publishing, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71216-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ataman, G. (1966) Géochimie des minéraux argileux dans les bassins sédimentaires marins études sur le bassin triasique du Jura. Revue Fran&amp;#231;aise de Géotechnique, 25, 67-82. https://www.persee.fr/doc/sgeol_0080-9020_1966_mon_25_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awongo, M.L. (1984) Stratigraphie, sédimentologie et géochimie des terres noires du Jurassique moyen et supérieur de la Provence (Sud-Est de la France). Phdthesis, Université Paul Cézanne - Aix-Marseille III. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00799978</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drugat, L. (2018) Geochemistry of Speleothems from the South-East of Europe (U-Th and 14C Chronology, Trace Elements, 87Sr/86Sr, 18O/16O, 13C/12C) for Climatic and Environmental Reconstructions during the Holocene. Theses, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02495354</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bjorlykke, K. (éd.) (2015) Petroleum Geoscience: From Sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics. 2e éd., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34132-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyers, P.A. (1994) Preservation of Elemental and Isotopic Source Identification of Sedimentary Organic Matter. Chemical Geology, 114, 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90059-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moldowan, J.M., Seifert, W.K. and Gallegos, E.J. (1985) Relationship between Petroleum Composition and Depositional Environment of Petroleum Source Rocks. AAPG Bull., 69, 1255-1268. https://doi.org/10.1306/AD462BC8-16F7-11D7-8645000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, M.A., Yao, K. and Digbehi, Z. (2020) Mineralogical Characterization of Upper Cretaceous Petroleum Source Rocks of Termit Sedimentary Basin (Niger). Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 11, 1173-1183. http://www.jmaterenvironsci.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Justin, W. (2017) 5 Reasons to Put Savannah Petroleum #SAVP on Your Watchlist. févr. https://www.voxmarkets.co.uk/blogs/5-reasons-to-put-savannah-petroleum-savp-on-your-watchlist/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ross, D.J.K. and Bustin, R.M. (2009) Investigating the Use of Sedimentary Geochemical Proxies for Paleoenvironment Interpretation of Thermally Mature Organic-Rich Strata: Examples from the Devonian-Mississippian Shales, Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Chemical Geology, 260, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moosavirad, S.M., Janardhana, M.R., Sethumadhav, M.S., Moghadam, M.R. and Shankara, M. (2010) Geochemistry of Lower Jurassic Shales of the Shemshak Formation, Kerman Province, Central Iran: Provenance, Source Weathering and Tectonic Setting. Chem. Geochemistry, 71, 279-288.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2010.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, X., Wang, J., Zeng, Y., Cheng, J. and Tan, F. (2011) Origin and Mode of Occurrence of Trace Elements in Marine Oil Shale from the Shengli River Area, Northern Tibet, China. Oil Shale, 28, 487. https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2011.4.03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bou Daher, S., Nader, F.H., Strauss, H. and Littke, R. (2014) Depositional Environment and Source-Rock Characterisation of Organic-Matter Rich Upper Santonian-Upper Campanian Carbonates, Northern Lebanon. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 37, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Genik, G.J. (1992) Regional Framework, Structural and Petroleum Aspects of Rift Basins in Niger, Chad and the Central African Republic (C.A.R.). Tectonophysics, 213, 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90257-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, E. and Zung, L.S. (2017) 3D Reservoir Characterization of Field Deta, Termit Basin, Niger. In: Awang, M., Negash, B.M., Md Akhir, N.A., Lubis, L.A. and Md. Rafek, A.G., éds., ICIPEG 2016, Springer, Singapore, 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasaruddin, M.N., Zung, L.S. and Rafek, A.G.M. (2017) Petrophysical Analysis of E5 Sand Group of Sokor Formation, Termit Basin, Niger. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 88, 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/88/1/012003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ning, Z., Xia, G., Jiangqin, H., Zhongmin, C. and Guangya, Z. (2018) Sedimentary Characteristics and Lithological Trap Identification of Distant Braided Delta Deposits: A Case on Upper Cretaceous Yogou Formation of Termit Basin, Niger. E3S Web Conf., 53, 03020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185303020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, H., Peng, X. and Pan, J. (2004) Distribution, Source and Enrichment of Some Chemical Elements in Sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Continental Shelf Research, 24, 1857-1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murray, H.H. (2006) Applied Clay Mineralogy: Occurrences, Processing and Applications of Kaolins, Bentonites, Palygorskitesepiolite, and Common Clays. 2nd Edition, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130937-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ousman, Z., Alassane, A., Dan, L.N., Paolo, R., Gemma, T.P. and Issaka, A. (2008) Caractérisation des Sols de Périmètres Irrigués de l’Ouest du Niger par Diffraction de Rayons X. Scinapse, 10, 89-97. https://scinapse.io/papers/2499476914</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>