<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJU</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Urology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-5440</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oju.2024.141003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJU-130764</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Male Urethral Stenosis in the Urology-Andrology Department of KARA Teaching Hospital (Togo)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Musapudi</surname><given-names>Éric Mbuya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Komi</surname><given-names>Hola Sikpa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edoe</surname><given-names>Viyome Sewa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Messan</surname><given-names>Semefa Agbedey</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gnimdou</surname><given-names>Botcho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kodjo</surname><given-names>Tengue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tchilabalo</surname><given-names>Matchonna Kpatcha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Urology and Andrology Department, Kara Teaching Hospital, Kara, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Urology and Andrology Department, Sokodé Regional Hospital Center, Sokodé, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Urology and Andrology Department, Kpalime Prefectural Hospital Center, Kpalime, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Urology and Andrology Department, Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Aneho Prefectural Hospital Center, Aneho, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Surgery Department, University Clinics of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, DRC</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Endoscopic internal urethrotomy (EIU) is a method for stricture opening using transurethral incision by direct visualisation of the urethral channel, resulting in a widening of the urinary canal with the aim of improving the quality of bladder emptying. The aim of the study was to evaluate the indication and results of EIU in the treatment of stenosis of the male urethra in the Urology-Andrology Department of Kara Teaching Hospital. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study with retrospective data collection in the Urology-Andrology department of Kara Teaching Hospital. It involved 21 records of patients with urethral stenosis treated by endoscopic internal urethrotomy (EIU) in the said department during the period from January 2021 to September 2023. The following variables were evaluated: age, circumstance of discovery, site, length, number, etiology of the urethral stenosis and evolution of the patients. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.2 &#177; 11.7 years. Infectious etiology of stenosis was predominant with 10 patients (47.6%) followed by trauma with 5 cases (23.8%). The bulbar urethra was the most frequently observed site, with 11 cases (52.4%). The length was mostly less than 2 cm in 12 patients (57.1%). Stenosis was unique in 14 patients (66.7%). The mean postoperative follow-up time was 3.2 months. The result was immediately better in 11 patients (52.4%) and it was poor in 8 patients (38.1%) who required maintenance dilation sessions.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Internal Urethrotomy</kwd><kwd> Urethral Stenosis</kwd><kwd> Kara</kwd><kwd> Togo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Treatment of urethral stenosis involves several techniques, including instrumental dilations, urethroplasty, stents and endoscopic internal urethrotomy (EIU) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref2">2</xref>] . The indication takes into account the age of the patient, the site of the stenosis and its length. The EIU is a method for stricture opening using transurethral incision by direct visualisation of the urethral channel, resulting in a widening of the urinary canal with the aim of improving the quality of bladder emptying [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref4">4</xref>] . It is simple, and repeatable, with simple operative outcomes, enormously shortening the hospital stay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref5">5</xref>] . The indications for endoscopic urethrotomy are therefore: short stenosis, single, bulbar urethra site, still passable with the blade, which and is operated for the first time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref7">7</xref>] . The aim of the study was to evaluate the indication and results of endoscopic internal urethrotomy in the treatment of stenosis of the male urethra at the Urology-Andrology Department of Kara Teaching Hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This was a cross-sectional descriptive study with retrospective data collection carried out in the urology department of the Kara Teaching Hospital Center. It focused on 21 files of patients with urethral stenosis, treated by endoscopic internal urethrotomy (EIU) in the said department during the period from January 2021 to September 2023. All patients operated on by the EIU who had a complete file and who had benefited from follow-up after the surgical procedure were included in this study.</p><p>For each patient, the following variables were evaluated: age, circumstances of discovery, site, length, number, etiology of the stenosis and evolution of the patients. The diagnosis of urethral stenosis was suggested by the symptoms of the lower urinary tract, weakness of the urinary stream, incomplete emptying of the bladder, and dysuria and confirmed by retrograde urethrography (RUG) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) which was carried out preoperatively in 17 patients. In 4 patients, the discovery of stenosis was intraoperative following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Under loco-regional anesthesia (spinal anesthesia), the urethrotomy was performed using the cold blade urethrotome, by sectioning the stenosis at 12 o’clock under visual control. The CH18 or 20 Silicone Foley Catheter was left in place and after its removal, success was assessed based on improvement in urinary symptoms. Thus, the result was better when urination was satisfactory, poor result when it was improved and unchanged dysuria requiring repeat urethrotomy or urethroplasty was considered a failure.</p><p>Retrograde urethrography (RUG) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) were not performed in the postoperative period. Due to a lack of materials, the urinary flowmetry was not carried out either.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During our period, 35 patients with urethral stenosis were operated on, including 21 cases of endoscopic internal urethrotomy, or 60% of cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The mean age was 59.2 &#177; 11.7 years. The extremes were 35 years for the youngest and 75 years for the oldest. Of the 21 patients, 14 (66.7%) were seen with urinary retention requiring a suprapubic drainage catheter and 7 patients (33.3%) had dysuria alone or associated with other lower urinary tract symptoms.</p><p>The infectious etiology of the stenosis was predominant with 10 patients (47.6%) followed by trauma with 5 cases (23.8%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the etiologies of stenosis.</p><p>Concerning the characteristics of the stenosis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), the bulbar urethra was the most frequently observed site with 11 cases (52.4%). The length was mainly less than 2 cm in 12 patients or 57.1% of cases. The stenosis was single in 14 patients or 66.7% of cases. The diagnosis of urethral stenosis was made using retrograde urethrography (RUG) and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) performed preoperatively in 17 patients, or 80.9% of cases, while in 4 patients (19.1) the discovery of stenosis was intraoperative during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The average hospital stay was 5.2 days with the range from 1 to 14 days. The time to remove the urethral catheter varied between 3 and 30 days depending on whether the cases were simple or complex with an average of 15.1 days. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 3.2 months with a variation of 1 to 7 months.</p><p>The result was immediately good (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) in 11 patients (52.4%), and it was considered poor in 8 patients (38.1%) who required maintenance dilation sessions.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of cases according to etiologies of urethral stenosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Etiology</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of cases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infectious</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traumatic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iatrogenic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not specified</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of the urethral stenosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of cases (N = 21)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Site of stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulbar urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Membranous urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulbar + Membranous urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prostatic urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anastomosis urethra and bladder post radical prostatectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤2 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not specified</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiple or complex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> EIU results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of cases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Success</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fail</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The treatment of urethral stenosis involves several procedures including instrumental dilations, open surgery, stents and internal urethrotomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref8">8</xref>] . Endoscopic internal urethrotomy has the advantage of being simple, easy and quick. It is free of morbidity and requires only a short hospitalization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref9">9</xref>] . The performance of EIU is increasing at the Kara Teaching Hospital, from 14 cases (58.3%) the previous two years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref10">10</xref>] to 21 cases (60%) today. The mean age of the patients was 59.2 &#177; 11.7 years. This result is similar to those of DJE in Ivory Coast and MUSTAFA in Turkey, which respectively report a mean age of 55 and 57 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Unlike other series in which the young population was mainly reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref8">8</xref>] . Urethral stricture only appears several years after the infectious episode, which was also the main etiology found in our study with 10 cases (47.6%). Infection remains the main cause found in most African series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>The bulbar urethra was the frequently observed site of stenosis with 11 cases (52.4%). This urethral part was also mentioned by JANVIER in Spain and ASHRAF in Egypt, as the preferred site of stenosis with respectively 53.3% and 48.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref16">16</xref>] . The bulbar dilatation constituting a reservoir where germs abound due to urinary stasis could explain this predilection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref17">17</xref>] . The stenosis was short, less than 2 cm in 12 patients (57.1%) and mainly single in 14 patients (66.7%). In his series, BENJELLOUN in Morocco reports the same observation, noting the predominance of short (70.7%) and single (80.9%) stenosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] . ASHRAF in Egypt and BENIZRI in France in their studies found single stenosis in 80.6% and 90.2% of cases respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref18">18</xref>] . These results comply with the recommendations from the urogenital reconstruction urologist group, which limit the indications for EIU to short bulbar stenoses (&lt;2 cm) and operated for the first time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The hospital stay is generally short but varies depending on the studies. In our study, the average was 5.2 days, identical to that reported in the BENJELLOUN series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] and close to that of DJE in Ivory Coast (6.8 days). Endoscopic internal urethrotomy can be performed on an outpatient basis and under local anesthesia without the need for hospitalization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref12">12</xref>] . For our study, the majority of patients come from distant places and are operated on weekends and monitored before being discharged at the beginning of the week, which could explain their prolonged hospital stay.</p><p>The average time of the bladder catheter was 15.1 days. It is similar to the one mentioned in MOBY’s studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref19">19</xref>] in Cameroon and DJE [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref5">5</xref>] in Ivory Coast, which was 14 days; BENIZRI in France reports an average time of 10 days. Although the recommended catheterization time is less than 72 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref14">14</xref>] , opinions are very divergent and range from refusing any use of the catheter, to indwelling the catheter for 6 weeks with different results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref2">2</xref>] . The bladder catheter may be left longer for the patient’s comfort or if the operator believes that early removal may increase complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The result was best in 11 patients (52.4%) and considered poor in 8 patients (38.1%) requiring maintenance urethral dilation. In their series, ZANGO and BENJELLOUN report the best results in 67.3% and 75.4% of cases respectively. The factors associated with the best results noted by several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref16">16</xref>] are the length of the stenosis less than 1 cm, the infectious etiology, the single stenosis of the bulbar site.</p><p>Studies are currently being tested to reduce the rate of recurrence after endoscopic internal urethrotomy. The injection of steroids (triamcinolone acetonide) may delay the recurrence of urethral stricture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref20">20</xref>] . A systematic review showed the effectiveness of mitomycin-C in reducing the number of cases of recurrence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130764-ref21">21</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Endoscopic internal urethrotomy is a simple, repeatable technique, with simple operative outcomes, enormously shortening the hospital stay. The results are better when the stenosis is short, single localized at the level of the bulbar urethra.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have read the latest version of the manuscript and declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mbuya, M.&#201;., Sikpa, K.H., Sewa, E.V., Agbedey, M.S., Botcho, G., Tengue, K. and Kpatcha, T.M. (2024) Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Male Urethral Stenosis in the Urology-Andrology Department of KARA Teaching Hospital (Togo). Open Journal of Urology, 14, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2024.141003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130764-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benjelloun, M., Drissi, M., Makhloufi, M., Nouri, A., Karnouni, T., Tazi, K., et al. (2008) Traitement des sténoses de l’urètre par urétrotomie endoscopique: Résultats anatomiques et fonctionnels d’une série de 244 cas. African Journal of Urology, 14, 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12301-008-0002-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oosterlinck, W. and Lumen, N. (2006) Traitement endoscopique des sténoses de l’urètre. Annales d’urologie, 40, 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anuro.2006.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Made, F., Karsenty, G., Yiou, R., Robert, G., Huyghe, E., Boillot, B., et al. (2021) Quelle prise en charge pour les sténoses de l’urètre antérieur chez l’homme? Recommandations 2021 du groupe d’urologue de reconstruction uro-génitale (GURU) sous l’égide du cams-AFU (comité d’andrologie et de médecine sexuelle de l’association fran&amp;#231;aise d’urologie). Progrès en Urologie, 16, 1055-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2021.07.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djordjevic, L. (2016) Treatment of Urethral Stricture Disease by Internal Urethrotomy, Dilation, or Stenting. European Urology Supplements, 15, 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2015.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dje, K., Coulibaly, A., Coulibaly, N. and Sangare, I.S. (1999) L’urétrotomie interne endoscopique dans le traitement du rétrécissement urétral acquis du noir africain: A propos de 140 cas. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 46, 56-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barbagli, G., Fossati, N., Montorsi, F., Balò, S., Rimondi, C., Larcher, A., et al. (2018) Focus on Internal Urethrotomy as Primary Treatment for Untreated Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Results from a Multivariable Analysis. European Urology Focus, 6, 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jill, C.B., Chris, H., Peter, G. and Jeff, C. (2014) SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: Dilation, Internal Urethrotomy, and Stenting of Male Anterior Urethral Strictures. Urology, 83, S18-S22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zango, B., Kambou, T. and Sanou, A. (2002) Urétrotomie interne endoscopique au centre hospitalier national Sourou de Bobo-Dioulasso: Faisabilité, innocuité et Résultats. African Journal of Urology, 8, 190-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konstantinos, S., Aggeliki, P., Hippocrates, M., Ioannis, K., Anargiros, P. and Georgios, C. (2014) A Simple Technique to Facilitate Treatment of Urethral Strictures with Optical Internal Urethrotomy. Case Reports in Urology, 2014, Article ID: 137605. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/137605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sikpa, K.H., Botcho, G., Sewa, E.V., Sade, S., Leloua, E. and Agbedey, M.S. (2023) Male Urethral Stricture: Epidemiological, Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects in Kara. Open Journal of Urology, 13, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2023.134013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adam, K., Miko&amp;#322;aj, F., Jakub, K., Agata, Z.R., Agnieszka, T. and Marcin, M. (2019) Evaluation of Outcomes of Urethral Stricture Surgery: Psychometric Validation of a Polish Language Version of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Urethral Stricture Surgery. Central European Journal of Urology, 72, 198-203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klufio, G.O. and Quartey, J.K. (1990) Internal Optical Uretrotomy: A Report of 51 Cases Treated under Local Anaesthesia. West African Journal of Medicine, 9, 242-243.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Charbit, L., Mersel, A., Beurton, D. and Cukier, J. (1990) Résultats à 5 ans du traitement des sténoses de l’urètre par urétrotomie interne chez l’adulte. Annales d’Urologie, 24, 66-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guirrassy, S., Simakan, N., Sow, K.B., Balde, S., et al. (2001) L’urétrotomie interne endoscopique dans le traitement des sténoses de l’urètre masculin au service d’urologie du CHU Ignace Deen. Annales d’Urologie, 35, 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4401(01)00022-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Javier, T.R., Miguel, á.A., Sergio, M.S., Mercedes, N.O., Víctor, M.L., et al. (2014) Outcome of Urethral Strictures Treated by Endoscopic Urethrotomy and Urethroplasty. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 8, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashraf, T.H., Ahmed, E.A., Mohamed, S.D., Osama, S. and Mahmoud, B. (2005) Long-Term Outcome of Visual Internal Urethrotomy for the Management of Pediatric Urethral Strictures. American Urological Association, 173, 595-597. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000151339.42841.6e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santucci, R.A., Joyce, G.F. and Wise, M. (2007) Male Urethral Stricture Disease. Journal of Urology, 177, 1667-1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benizri, E., Chevallier, D., Quintens, H., Fabiani, P., Degraeve, B., et al. (1992) Urétrotomie interne endoscopique Etude rétrospective de 132 observations. Progrès en Urologie, 2, 623-627.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moby, E., Makon, S., Eyongueta, D., Kamadjou, C., Sala, B., et al. (2018) Traitement des sténoses de l’urètre par urétrotomie interne endoscopique: Profil épidémiologique, clinique, et thérapeutique à Douala. Revue de Médecine et de Pharmacie, 8, 775-783.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamyar, T.T., Aliasghar, Y. and Shabnam, M. (2011) Triamcinolone Injection Following Internal Urethrotomy for Treatment of Urethral Stricture. Urology Journal, 8, 132-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130764-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gampo, A.I., Irfan, W. and Andy, A. (2020) Efficacy of Mitomycin-C on Anterior Urethral Stricture after Internal Urethrotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. F1000Research, 8, Article No. 1390. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19704.3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>