<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2024.121009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-130721</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Weak External Bisection of Some Graphs
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yumin</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>97</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Let 
  G be a graph. A bipartition of 
  G is a bipartition of 
  V (
  G) with 
  V (
  G) = 
  V
  <sub>1</sub> ∪ 
  V
  <sub>2</sub> and 
  V
  <sub>1</sub> ∩ 
  V
  <sub>2</sub> = ∅. If a bipartition satisfies ∥
  V
  <sub>1</sub>∣ - ∣
  V
  <sub>2</sub>∥ ≤ 1, we call it a bisection. The research in this paper is mainly based on a conjecture proposed by Bollob&#225;s and Scott. The conjecture is that every graph 
  G has a bisection (
  V
  <sub>1</sub>, 
  V
  <sub>2</sub>) such that ∀
  v ∈ 
  V
  <sub>1</sub>, at least half minuses one of the neighbors of 
  v are in the 
  V
  <sub>2</sub>; ∀
  v ∈ 
  V
  <sub>2</sub>, at least half minuses one of the neighbors of 
  v are in the 
  V
  <sub>1</sub>. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture for some bipartite graphs, crown graphs and windmill graphs.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Weak External Bisection</kwd><kwd> Bipartite Graph</kwd><kwd> Windmill Graph</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Let G be a graph with vertex set V ( G ) and edge set E ( G ) . An external bipartition of G is V ( G ) = V 1 ∪ V 2 and V 1 ∩ V 2 = ∅ and requires that at least half of the neighbors of each vertex are in the other part. If a bipartition satisfies | | V 1 | − | V 2 | | ≤ 1 , we call it a bisection and denote it by ( V 1 , V 2 ) . Ban and Linial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130721-ref1">1</xref>] showed that every class 1, 3 or 4 regular graph G has an external bisection. Bollob&#225;s and Scott [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130721-ref2">2</xref>] observed that not every graph has an external bisection. In the same paper, they gave a counterexample that K 2 l + 1 , m , where m ≥ 2 l + 3 doesn’t have an external bisection. Esperet, Mazzuoccolo and Tarsi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130721-ref3">3</xref>] found a set of cubic graphs without external bisection and containing at least 2 bridges.</p><p>For vertices u , v ∈ V ( G ) , if u v ∈ E ( G ) , then edge uv is said to be associated with u and v. The degree of v is the number of edges in G associated with v, denoted as d ( v ) . Let ( V 1 , V 2 ) be a bisection of G. For a vertex v in V<sub>1</sub>, the internal degree of v is the number of the edges associated with v and other endpoints of these edges are in V<sub>1</sub> too; and the external degree of v is the number of the edges associated with v and other endpoints of these edges are in V<sub>2</sub>. For a vertex v in V<sub>2</sub>, the internal degree of v is the number of the edges associated with v and other endpoints of these edges are in V<sub>2</sub>; and the external degree of v is the number of the edges associated with v and other endpoints of these edges are in V<sub>1</sub>. The internal degree of v is denoted as d i n ( v ) and the external degree of v is denoted as d e x ( v ) .</p><p>A graph is said to be a bipartite graph, denoted by G [ X , Y ] , if the set of vertices of the graph can be partitioned into two non-empty subsets X and Y such that no two vertices in X are connected to each other with an edge and no two vertices in Y are connected with an edge.</p><p>The crown graph of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130721-ref4">4</xref>] G n , m satisfies the condition:</p><p>V ( G n , m ) = { u i | i = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n } ∪ { v i | i = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n } ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m } ;</p><p>E ( G n , m ) = { u 1 u 2 , u 2 u 3 , ⋯ , u n u 1 } ∪ { v 1 v 2 , v 2 v 3 , ⋯ , v n v 1 } ∪ { v 1 u 1 , v 2 u 2 , ⋯ , v n u n }                                     ∪ i = 1 n { u i u i j | j = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m } ∪ i = 1 n { u i j u i ( j + 1 ) | j = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 } , ( n ≥ 3 , m ≥ 1 ) .</p><p>For example, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows G 3 , 3 .</p><p>A windmill graph K m ( n ) is a graph consisting of n m-order complete graphs K m with a common vertex.</p><p>For example, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows K 4 ( n ) .</p><p>Conjecture 1.1. (Bollob&#225;s and Scott [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130721-ref2">2</xref>] ). Every graph G has a weak external bisection that is G has a bisection ( V 1 , V 2 ) , such that:</p><p>d e x ( v ) ≥ d i n ( v ) − 1 for all v ∈ V ( G ) .</p><p>Ji, Ma, Yan and Yu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130721-ref5">5</xref>] showed that every graphic sequence has a realization for which Conjecture 1.1 holds. In the same paper, they gave an infinite family of counterexamples to Conjecture 1.1.</p><p>In this paper, we confirm this conjecture for some graphs by showing the following three theorems.</p><p>Theorem 1.1. Let G [ X , Y ] be a bipartite graph with | X | = 3 , then G [ X , Y ] admits a weak external bisection.</p><p>Theorem 1.2. Every crown graph G n , m admits a weak external bisection.</p><p>Theorem 1.3. Every windmill graph K m ( n ) admits a weak external bisection.</p><p>In fact, by the proof Theorem 1.2, G n , m admits an external bisection.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Weak External Bisection</title><p>In this section, we prove Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.3.</p><p>Proof of Theorem 1.1. Let G [ X , Y ] be a bipartite graph with two parts X and Y, we define Y S = { y ∈ Y | N ( y ) = S , S ⊆ X } .</p><p>For a set S, we define a function:</p><p>f ( S ) = { 1 if | S | isodd; 0 if | S | iseven . (1)</p><p>Let X = { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , and assume, without loss of generality, that:</p><p>| Y { v 1 , v 3 } | ≥ | Y { v 1 , v 2 } | ≥ | Y { v 2 , v 3 } | .</p><p>Otherwise, we can re-label the three vertices in X. We give a weak external bisection ( V 1 , V 2 ) of V ( G ) by three steps.</p><p>First, let { v 1 , v 2 } ⊆ V 1 , { v 3 } ⊆ V 2 , Y { v 1 , v 2 } ⊆ V 2 and Y { v 1 , v 3 } * ⊆ V 1 where Y { v 1 , v 3 } * ⊆ Y { v 1 , v 3 } and | Y { v 1 , v 3 } * | = | Y { v 1 , v 2 } | . Because | Y { v 1 , v 3 } | ≥ | Y { v 1 , v 2 } | , such Y { v 1 , v 3 } * exists. Let Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * = Y { v 1 , v 3 } \ Y { v 1 , v 3 } * .</p><p>Then, we partition the odd sets of Y { v 2 } , Y { v 1 } , Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * , Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 3 } one after another. Denote by S 1 , S 2 , ⋯ , S m , the odd sets of Y { v 2 } , Y { v 1 } , Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * , Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 3 } , with the same order. For each i ∈ { 1 , ⋯ , m } , put ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ vertices of S i into V<sub>2</sub> and ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ vertices of S i into V<sub>1</sub> if i is odd; and put ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ vertices of S i into V<sub>1</sub> and ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ vertices of S i into V<sub>2</sub> if i is even.</p><p>Finally, denote by T 1 , T 2 , ⋯ , T k the even sets of Y { v 2 } , Y { v 1 } , Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * , Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 3 } . For each i = 1 , ⋯ , k , put | T i | 2 vertices of T i into V<sub>1</sub> and | T i | 2 vertices of T i into V<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>Now, we show that V<sub>1</sub> and V<sub>2</sub> form a weak external bisection of G [ X , Y ] . Clearly, | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 0 if m is odd, and | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 1 if m is even. So ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a bisection. Since { v 1 , v 2 } ⊆ V 1 and Y { v 1 , v 2 } ⊆ V 2 , then d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 2 for each vertex v ∈ Y { v 1 , v 2 } . Moreover, | d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) | = 1 for each vertex v ∈ Y S if S ⊆ { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } and | S | = 1 or 3; and d e x ( v ) = d i n ( v ) for each vertex v ∈ Y S if S ⊆ { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , S ≠ { v 1 , v 2 } and | S | = 2 . So, for each v ∈ Y , d e x ( v ) ≥ d i n ( v ) − 1 .</p><p>Let:</p><p>S 1 = { Y { v 1 } , Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * , Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } } , S 2 = { Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 2 , v 3 } } , S 3 = { Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * , Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 3 } } .</p><p>Let S ′ i = { S 1 , S 2 , ⋯ , S m } ∩ S i , for each i = 1 , 2 , 3 . Note that S 1 , S 2 , ⋯ , S m are the odd sets of Y { v 2 } , Y { v 1 } , Y { v 1 , v 3 } * * , Y { v 1 , v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 2 , v 3 } , Y { v 3 } , with the same order. Then, each S ′ i contains several continuous set of S 1 , S 2 , ⋯ , S m . Let T i = { T 1 , T 2 , ⋯ , T k } ∩ S i , for each i = 1 , 2 , 3 . We have:</p><p>d e x ( v 1 ) = | Y { v 1 , v 2 } | + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 1 i isodd ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 1 i iseven ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ + ∑ T i ⊆ T 1 | T i | 2   ; d i n ( v 1 ) = | Y { v 1 , v 3 } * | + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 1 i isodd ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 1 i iseven ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ + ∑ T i ⊆ T 1 | T i | 2   .</p><p>Since S ′ 1 contains continuous set of S 1 , S 2 , ⋯ , S m , then we see that | d e x ( v 1 ) − d i n ( v 1 ) | = f ( S ′ 1 ) , where f ( S ′ 1 ) is defined as (1). It is easy to see that:</p><p>d e x ( v 2 ) = | Y { v 1 , v 2 } | + ⌈ | Y { v 2 } | 2 ⌉ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 2 i isodd ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 2 i iseven ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ + ∑ T i ⊆ T 2 | T i | 2   ; d i n ( v 2 ) = ⌊ | Y { v 2 } | 2 ⌋ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 2 i isodd ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 2 i iseven ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ + ∑ T i ⊆ T 2 | T i | 2   .</p><p>Clearly, if | Y { v 2 } | is odd, then S 1 = Y { v 2 } . Thus, we have d e x ( v 2 ) − d i n ( v 2 ) ≥ | Y { v 1 , v 2 } | + f ( Y { v 2 } ) − f ( S ′ 2 ) ≥ − 1 . Similarly, we have:</p><p>d e x ( v 3 ) = | Y { v 1 , v 3 } * | + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 3 i isodd ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 3 i iseven ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ + ∑ T i ⊆ T 3 | T i | 2   ; d i n ( v 3 ) = ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 3 i isodd ⌈ | S i | 2 ⌉ + ∑ S i ⊆ S ′ 3 i iseven ⌊ | S i | 2 ⌋ + ∑ T i ⊆ T 3 | T i | 2   .</p><p>So, we have | d e x ( v 3 ) − d i n ( v 3 ) | ≥ | Y { v 1 , v 3 } * | − f ( S ′ 2 ) . Then, for each v i ∈ X , d e x ( v i ) ≥ d i n ( v i ) − 1 . Thus, ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a weak external bisection of G [ X , Y ] .n</p><p>Proof of Theorem 1.2. Let V ( G n , m ) = { u i | i = 1 , ⋯ , n } ∪ { v i | i = 1 , ⋯ , n } ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j = 1 , ⋯ , m } . We give a weak external bisection ( V 1 , V 2 ) of V ( G n , m ) by two steps.</p><p>First, let { v i | i ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n }   and i isodd } ⊂ V 2 and { v i | i ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n }   and i iseven } ⊂ V 1 . Let { u i | i ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n }   and i isodd } ⊂ V 1 and { u i | { i ∈ 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n }   and i   iseven } ⊂ V 2 .</p><p>Then, we partition the set ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m } . The partition of ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m } is determined by ∪ i = 1 n { u i } . For a given k, if u k ∈ V 1 , let { u k j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m }   and   j isodd } ⊂ V 2 and { u k j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m }   and j iseven } ⊂ V 1 ; if u k ∈ V 2 , let { u k j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , m }   and   j isodd } ⊂ V 1 and { u k j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m }   and j iseven } ⊂ V 2 .</p><p>Now, we show that V<sub>1</sub> and V<sub>2</sub> form a weak external bisection of G n , m . Clearly, | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 1 if both n and m are odd. Otherwise, | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 0 . So, ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a bisection. If n is even, then d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { v i } . If n is odd, then d e x ( v 1 ) − d i n ( v 1 ) = 1 , d e x ( v n ) − d i n ( v n ) = 1 and d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 2 n − 1 { v i } . So, in any case, d e x ( v i ) ≥ d i n ( v i ) for i = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n .</p><p>If m is odd, then d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 2 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i 1 , u i m } , d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 1 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j ∈ { 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } and d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j ∈ { 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } . If m is even, then d e x ( u i 1 ) − d i n ( u i 1 ) = 2 , d e x ( u i m ) = d i n ( u i m ) , d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 1 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j ∈ { 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } and d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i j | j ∈ { 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } . So, in any case, d e x ( u i j ) ≥ d i n ( u i j ) for i = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n ; j = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m .</p><p>If both n and m are odd, then d e x ( u 1 ) − d i n ( u 1 ) = 2 , d e x ( u n ) − d i n ( u n ) = 2 and d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 4 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 2 n − 1 { u i } . If n is odd and m is even, then d e x ( u 1 ) − d i n ( u 1 ) = 1 , d e x ( u n ) − d i n ( u n ) = 1 and d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 2 n − 1 { u i } . If n is even and m is odd, then d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 4 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i } . If both n and m are even, then d e x ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { u i } . So, in any case, d e x ( u i ) ≥ d i n ( v i ) for i = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , n . Thus, ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a weak external bisection of G n , m .n</p><p>Proof of Theorem 1.3. We labeled the vertices of graph K m ( n ) as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. V ( K m ( n ) ) = { x 0 } ∪ i = 1 n { x i 1 , x i 2 , ⋯ , x i , m − 1 } . Let { x 0 } ⊂ V 1 .</p><p>We consider the following two cases.</p><p>Case 1. m is odd.</p><p>Let ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } ⊂ V 1 and ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } ⊂ V 2 . Now | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 1 . So ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a bisection. d e v ( x 0 ) − d i n ( x 0 ) = 1 . For each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } , d e v ( v ) = d i n ( v ) . For each v ∈ ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } , d e v ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 2 . Thus, ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a weak external bisection of K m ( n ) .</p><p>Case 2. m is even.</p><p>If i is odd, let ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } ⊂ V 2 and let ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } ⊂ V 1 . If i is even, let ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } ⊂ V 1 and let ∪ i = 1 n { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } ⊂ V 2 .</p><p>Now, we show that V<sub>1</sub> and V<sub>2</sub> form a weak external bisection of K m ( n ) . Clearly, | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 0 if n is odd and | V 1 | − | V 2 | = 1 if n is even. So ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a bisection. If i is odd, d e v ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 1 for each v ∈ { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } ; and d e v ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 1 for each v ∈ { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } . If i is even, then d e v ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = − 1 for each v ∈ { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j isodd } ; and d e v ( v ) − d i n ( v ) = 3 for each v ∈ { x i j | j ∈ { 1 , ⋯ , m − 1 }   and   j iseven } . If n is even, then d e v ( x 0 ) = d i n ( x 0 ) . If n is odd, then d e v ( x 0 ) − d i n ( x 0 ) = 1 . Thus, ( V 1 , V 2 ) is a weak external bisection of K m ( n ) .n</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Liu, Y.M. (2024) Weak External Bisection of Some Graphs. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 12, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2024.121009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130721-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ban, A. and Linial, N. (2016) Internal Partitions of Regular Graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 83, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.21909</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130721-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bollobás, B., and Scott, A.D. (2002) Problems and Results on Judicious Partitions. Random Structures &amp; Algorithms, 21, 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.10062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130721-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esperet, L., Mazzuoccolo, G. and Tarsi, M. (2017) Flows and Bisections in Cubic Graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 86, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.22118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130721-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names> X.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Adjacent Vertex Distinguishing Incidence Chromatic Number of Crown Graph Gn,m</article-title><source> Journal of Shandong University of Technology (Natural Science Edition)</source><volume> 23</volume>,<fpage> 40</fpage>-<lpage>43</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130721-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ji, Y.L., Ma, J., Yan, J. and Yu, X.X. (2019) On Problems about Judicious Bipartitions of Graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 139, 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2019.03.001</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>