<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2024.141005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-130670</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Mobility of Major and Trace Elements during the Bauxitization Processes in Ngaoundal Area (Adamawa Cameroon): Implication on Mining Perspectives
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>André</surname><given-names>Sini</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Harouna</surname><given-names>Boukari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ondoa</surname><given-names>Augustin Désiré Balla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djetenbe</surname><given-names>Beral</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salomon</surname><given-names>Wangmené Awé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Simon</surname><given-names>Djakba Basga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Pierre Nguetnkam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mining Engineering and Environment, School of Mining, Industry and Geology, University of Abdou-Moumouni, Niamey, Niger</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Mining Engineering, Saint Jerome Polytechnic, Saint Jerome Catholic University Institute of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mining Engineering, School of Geology and Mining Engineering, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Garoua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study was focused to assess major and trace elements in bauxitic duricrusts from Ngaoundal and its surroundings in order to establish their mining interest. To this end, fieldworks, mineralogical and geochemical analyses were carried out. Four facies of duricrust were identified and characterized from the summit to the top of the slope of the Ngaoundal mountain: scoriaceous, pisolitic, nodular and massive. Mineralogical and geochemical analyses performed on 16 samples, revealed a significant concentration of Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub> mainly in the scoriaceous facies (over 45% in grade), moderate in Fe
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub> (averaging 23.69%) and SiO
  <sub>2</sub> (averaging 21.7%). Trace elements were generally low, excluding Cr (421 ppm on average), Zr (327 ppm on average and V (213 ppm on average). In addition, the limited quantities of alkalis (Na
  <sub>2</sub>O, K
  <sub>2</sub>O) and alkaline earths metals (MgO, CaO) coupled with the very high values of Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) and Mineralogical Index of Alteration (MIA), (more than 99%) attest to the intense weathering of the studied materials. Allitization and monosiallitization constituted the crystallochemical phenomena that have led to the development of bauxitic minerals. More than 90% of gibbsite in scoriaceous facies, 52.21% - 76.01% of kaolinite in pisolitic facies and more than 40% of hematite in nodular facies were quantified. The relationships between the constitutive components indicated their interdependency during the bauxitization phenomenon. The mineralogical and geochemical properties highlighted the mining interest of the studied duricrusts to be valorized.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Duricrust</kwd><kwd> Bauxitization Phenomenon</kwd><kwd> Mineralogical and Geochemical Characterization</kwd><kwd> Major and Trace Elements</kwd><kwd> Mining Potential</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Bauxites are residual or sedimentary rocks most often white, red or gray in color, with more than 40% of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, less than 10% SiO<sub>2</sub> and 20% Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref1">1</xref>] . They are recognized as the main provider of aluminum. They are mainly formed under humid tropical to sub-tropical climates, with rainfalls in excess of 1200 mm and annual mean temperatures higher than 22˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref2">2</xref>] . These materials play an important role in the economy of countries because they are the main resources of aluminum, and they may contain several critical elements, including rare earth elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref3">3</xref>] . Deposits are generally characterized into 3 major groups: lateritic bauxite deposits, karst bauxite deposits, and Tikhvin-type bauxite deposits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref3">3</xref>] . The first group is the product of in situ and direct chemical weathering of alumino-silicate rocks lying beneath the surface. The second group is developed on the surface of more or less karstified carbonates (limestone and dolomite) and scarce marls. The third group is formed on the surface of eroded alumino-silicate rocks and is the erosional product of lateritic bauxite deposits. In Cameroon, several works on laterites in general, and lateritic bauxites in particular, were conducted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref7">7</xref>] . Some of these studies were focused on the characterization and evaluation of the well-known bauxites ores deposits in Minim Martap and Ngaoundal-Ngaoundouro in the Adamawa region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref9">9</xref>] , as well as in Fongo-Tongo and Bangam in the West region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref6">6</xref>] . To ensure its emergence by 2035, it is essential for Cameroon to develop and appropriate geological knowledge of its subsurface. All this work contributed to a greater understanding of duricrust formations, but the available data are not sufficient to justify their entire mining potential. Furthermore, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the studied formations represent an important factor to control their mining properties. This study therefore focused on the behavior and the distribution of major and trace elements within duricrust formations from Ngaoundal and its surroundings, in order to assess their mining potential.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area and Geological Settings</title><p>The studied area is located in zone 6˚22 and 6˚30 North Latitude and 13˚11 and 13˚18 East Longitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>It is subjected to tropical Sudanese humid climate characterized by a long rainy season from March to October and short dry season from November to February [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref10">10</xref>] . The average annual rainfall is between 1500 and 1700 mm. The Sudano-Guinean anthropized savannah is the type of vegetation encountered in Ngaoundal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref11">11</xref>] . The geomorphological features of the studied area are composed mainly of hills, with the Ngaoundal mountain which reaches an altitude of 1400 m. There are also some intermediate landforms made up of rolling land with some residual rises and plateaus that rarely exceed an altitude of 1100 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . The slopes are steep and slightly inclined, separated by convexo concave interfluves coated by bauxitic duricrust formations, outcropping from the tops to the bottom of the hill.</p><p>From the geological point of view (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), the Ngaoundal sector belongs to the Central Cameroonian domain, also called the Adamawa-Yade domain of the Pan-African Chain of Central Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref14">14</xref>] . It includes Syn to late-tectonic granito&#239;ds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref15">15</xref>] , partially overlain by basaltic, trachytic and phonolitic flows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref16">16</xref>] . In this region, the bauxite ores deposits are developed exclusively from the altered basalts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . Soils are dominated by ferralsols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref17">17</xref>] associated with duricrusts which play an important role in the pedology of Adamawa region.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Analytical Procedures</title><p>Based on the field relations and differences in duricrust facies, sixteen samples were collected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). These were separated into two groups, the first referring to the samples from the trench’s profiles and the second consisting of the blocks of duricrust outcropping on the ground surface. The first group included</p><p>four samples, two from the first profile and one from each of the last two. The second group was constituted of twelve samples classified into four facies (scoriaceous, pisolitic, massive and nodular), each with three samples. After morphological characterization, all sixteen samples were subjected to mineralogical and geochemical analysis at Geoscience Laboratories (Geo Labs) in Canada, after their preparation in the Mechanical Ore Preparation Laboratory of School of Mining, Industry and Geology of Niamey (Niger).</p><p>The mineralogical composition was semiquantitatively determined by using X-ray diffraction (XRD-100) after pulverizing sample powders with an agate mortar and pestle. Samples were analyzed with Co radiation at 40 kV and 45 mA. The following parameters were used in the X’PertHighScore Plus software for the peak identification, and a Rietveld Refinement process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref18">18</xref>] was applied for semi-quantifying the proportion of each mineral.</p><p>The compositional values of major and minor oxides along with the trace and rare earth elements were determined by using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (WD-XRF) coupled to ICP-AES and ICP-MS methods. The LOI (Loss on ignition) values were measured on the basis of weighting the samples before and after one hour of heating at 1000˚C. The performance of each method employed at the Geo Labs is monitored using control charts of the analysis of interlaboratory and in-house reference materials. The overall precision of the analytical methods can be assessed from the reproducibility of the analyses of the reference materials that were cycled through as quality assurance monitors during sample analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><p>The mobility of chemical elements during weathering was investigated using two indices of alteration, the Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) and the Mineralogical Index of Alteration (MIA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref19">19</xref>] . The CIA evaluates cations (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>) mobility in relation to Al<sup>3+</sup> considered as immobile element while the MIA determines the degree of transformation of primary minerals into secondary minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref20">20</xref>] . These indices are obtained by these formulae:</p><p>CIA = 100 &#215; [ Al 2 O 3 Al 2 O 3 + CaO + Na 2 O + K 2 O ] . The MIA is deduced from the CIA</p><p>formula: MIA = 2 &#215; ( CIA − 50 ) . The obtained data were processed by using Excel program. The various diagrams were performed with Sigma Plot 14.5 while the various maps were generated using GOOGLE MAPS and QGIS version 2.18.15.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Morphological Description</title><p>The morphological characterization of the duricrusts outcropping in blocks on the ground surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) showed that the scoriaceous facies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)) was the most distributed. It was observed from the top to the bottom of the hill. It was mainly characterized by a mottled porous</p><p>matrix; whose overall appearance gives them the character of a volcanic slag. The yellowish spots, which are very abundant in the summit formations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)), tended to disappear in those of the mid-slop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)) and the base of the hill (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). The pisolitic facies (Figures 4(j)-(l)) was the least abundant and corresponded to the continuous bauxitic duricrusts which outcrop essentially at the foot of the hill. These formations were characterized by more or less friable spherical concretions contained in a red matrix. Massive and nodular facies outcropped at the top of the hill and at mid-slope. The former (Figures 4(g)-(i)) were very compact and very resistant. These were characterized by a nearly homogeneous red matrix and a total lack of nodules, but a few rare whitish spots within the matrix of the formations at the foot slope. The second ones (Figures 4(d)-(f)) presented red matrix containing millimeter to centimeter nodules in varying degrees of abundance. They also displayed white and gray punctuation on the formations of the top of the hill, while those of the mid-slope were stripped of the whitish spots.</p><p>Profiles description (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) focused on the variation in thickness of the horizons. It consists of: the structure or texture, color, traces of any biological activity, the limit between a layer and the one below, and the presence of vegetation cover.</p><p>The first profile (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)) with a thickness of 350 cm had three layers. The first (0 - 15 cm) was sandy-claybrown (7.5YR 4/3), rich in organic matter. It contained an abundance of fine roots and millimetric to centimetric nodules. Blocks of duricrust were found in outcropping. The limit with the underlying</p><p>level was clearly defined. The second level (15 - 195 cm) referred to a slab of reddish-brown duricrust (5YR 4/4), massive and compact. It showed relics of primary minerals and whitish spots. The transition was irregular throughout the trench and distinctive with the underlying level. The third and last horizon (195 - 350 cm) was marked by a yellowish-red clay layer (5YR 5/6), slightly compact and containing a high proportion of millimetric to centimetric nodules and abundant fine roots. It presented traces of biological activities and some relics of primary minerals.</p><p>The second profile (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)) was 380 cm in thickness and showed 3 layers. An upper level (0 - 70 cm) was brown nodular horizon (10YR 4/3). It enclosed fine roots and signs of biological activities. It contained millimetric to centimetric nodules. It presented clearly defined interface with the level below. An Intermediate level (70 - 290 cm) referred to slab of duricrust with a red background (2.5YR 4/6). It was very compact, very hard and contained very few fine roots, embedded in an abundance of rusty spots. Towards the transition to the bottom level, the matrix background changed to dark red. The limit was gradual with the inferior level. A lower layer (290 - 380 cm) was yellowish clayey red level (5YR 5/6), with a polyhedric structure and enclosing some rare fine roots, nodules and fragments of duricrust. It also included whitish patches disseminated within the complex.</p><p>The third and last profile (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c)) was composed of 2 levels: the first one (0 - 150 cm) constituted of a dark brown duricrust (7.5YR 5/6), outcropped as a very compact and hard slab above loosen soils. A few rare vacuoles backfilled with dark brown soils were identified in a matrix that contained an abundance of rusty and whitish spots. The lower boundary was abrupt and regular. The second (150 - 350 cm) referred to red level (2.5YR 4/6), sandy-clay, containing many yellow spots and vacuoles filled with dark brown earth from biological activities. It contained fragments of duricrust, an abundance of fine roots and few yellowish spots.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Mineralogical Characterization</title><p>According to mineralogical analyses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), gibbsite was the most abundant mineral particularly in scoriaceous facies. It represented more than 90% of minerals detected by X-ray. Hematite is also recorded, but in low quantities (3.88% - 6.1%) whereas kaolinite, quartz and goethite were totally lack in these materials. In the pisolitic facies, mineral association included gibbsite, kaolinite, hematite and goethite. Kaolinite was the most abundant mineral in these facies. It represented 52.21% to 76.01% of minerals detected by X-ray. Gibbsite grade was fairly low, but a significant content in the PIF2 sample (25.93%) was observed. Similarly, hematite was weak but it was a quite high proportion in PIF3 sample (16.84%). The nodular facies were mostly composed of hematite (41.85% to 42.01%) and kaolinite (30.79% to 45.97%). The quartz content was moderate. It varied from 12.22% to 25.19%. There was a total lack of goethite and gibbsite minerals in these formations. Three minerals were distinguished in the massive red-bottom facies: gibbsite (19.73% to 59.43%), hematite (24.87% to 68.13%) and quartz (9.17% to 15.7%). The first two minerals (gibbsite and hematite) were the most abundant and quartz the least important.</p><p>The two lower layers of the first profile were examined. The upper level showed a significant proportion of quartz mineral (66.06%), a moderate content of gibbsite (24.84%) and a slight content of kaolinite (9.1 %). It did not include hematite and goethite. The lower layer indicated the same pattern with a content of 55.91% quartz, 34.02% gibbsite and 10.07% kaolinite and lack of hematite and goethite. The second profile analyzed on its second layer, displayed 78.39% gibbsite, 11% kaolinite and 10.61% quartz. These results confirmed a significant content of gibbsite. The third profile analyzed on its first level indicated an interested content of quartz (48.82%) and gibbsite (36.25%), and weaker in kaolinite (14.93%). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the X-ray patterns of the analyzed samples.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Geochemical Features</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Distribution of Major Elements</title><p>Major elements analyses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) indicated Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> as the main oxides. Alkali (Na<sub>2</sub>O, K<sub>2</sub>O) and alkaline earth metals (MgO, CaO), along with P and Mn (as oxides) were present in rather low concentrations (sum of the average contents less than 1%).</p><p>Scoriaceous facies showed high concentrations of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. We noted 47.92% in the hilltop formations (SCT1), 45.57% in the mid-slope formations (SCM1) and 49.65%) in the foot of the hill formations (SCF1). Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> contents were lower. These were respectively 21.02% from SCT1, 24.19% from SCM1 and 17.9% from SCF1. TiO<sub>2</sub> was low (2.43%, 3.84% and 2.57% respectively) and silica in traces (&lt; 1% in all the three samples). The pisolitic facies were mostly found at the foot of the hill. Three samples distinguished them: PIF1, PIF2 and PIF3. They showed interested concentrations of alumina (31.66%, 37.99% and 32.8% respectively) and silica (34.46%, 21.09% and 36.31%). Iron oxide was moderate (15.21%, 22.08% and 13.04%) and titanium oxide fairly low (3.81%, 4% and 4.11%). The</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mineralogical composition (wt.%) obtained by quantitative Rietveld Refinement on the bauxitic duricrust. (-) = mineral absent or present but below calculation limits, i.e. &lt;5%, SCT = Scoriaceous facies collected at the top of the hill, SCM = Scoriaceous facies collected at mid-slop, SCF = Scoriaceous facies collected at the foot of the hill, PIF = Pisolitic facies collected at the foot of the hill, NOT = Nodular facies collected at the top of the hill, NOM = Nodular facies collected at mid-slop, MAM = Massive facies collected at mid-slop, MAF = Massive facies collected at the foot of the hill, FTL2 = Level 2 of first trench, FTL3 = Level 3 from first trench, STL2 = Level 2 from second trench, TTL1 = Level 1 from third trench, T = Trench</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Minerals content (wt.%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Facies/Profiles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kaolinite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quartz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Goethite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gibbsite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Scoriaceous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCT1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Pisolitic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Nodular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOT1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOT2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Massive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAF2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >T1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTL2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTL3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STL2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TTL1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Major elements (wt.%) of the studied bauxitic formation. LOI = Loss On Ignition; (D.L) = Detection Limits, SCT = Scoriaceous facies collected at the top of the hill, SCM = Scoriaceous facies collected at mid-slop, SCF = Scoriaceous facies collected at the foot of the hill, PIF = Pisolitic facies collected at the foot of the hill, NOT = Nodular facies collected at the top of the hill, NOM = Nodular facies collected at mid-slop, MAM = Massive facies collected at mid-slop, MAF = Massive facies collected at the foot of the hill, FTL2 = Level 2 of first trench, FTL3 = Level 3 from first trench, STL2 = Level 2 from second trench, TTL1 = Level 1 from third trench, T = Trench</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Scoriaceous facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pisolitic facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Nodular facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Massive facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >T1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D.L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCT1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOT1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOT2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAF2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTL2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTL3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STL2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TTL1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.054</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.298</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CIA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MIA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.08</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>nodular facies were either enriched in alumina, or in iron oxides or silica. Indeed, NOT1 was more concentrated in silica (31.43%), then alumina (27.96%) and finally iron oxides (22.53%). In contrary, NOT2 was more focused in iron oxides (30.15%), followed by silica (27.88%) and alumina (25.65%). Titanium oxide, with a content of 4.21% in the two samples, was the least concentrated within these formations. The massive red-bottom facies were found at mid-slope (MAM1) and at the bottom of the slope (MAF1 and MAF2). They revealed significant alumina concentrations. Indeed, the first ones showed a content of 39.55%, the second ones of 32.92% and the third ones of 38.06%. They enclosed respective contents of iron oxides of 27.3%, 29.72% and 21.34%. Silica was showed in respective proportions of 6.34%, 18.57% and 16.89%. Titanium oxide was less concentrated (5.07%, 3.88% and 2.55% respectively in MAM1, MAF1 and MAF2).</p><p>The geochemistry of major elements along the profiles indicated that their proportions varied from one layer to another. The first profile indicated significant silica levels in the two samples constituted: 32.63% from FTL2 and 39.27% from FTL3. Alumina concentration ranged from 23.42% to 26.89% and iron oxide from 15.92% to 24.12%. Titanium oxide was encountered in trace amounts (&lt;1%). Geochemical analysis of the second profile (STL2) revealed significant proportions of iron oxides (31.43%). Silica and alumina contents were respectively 26.32% and 23.61%. Titanium oxide was weak (0.65%). On geochemical point of view, third profile (TTL1) analysis showed a most abundant content of iron oxides (39.46%), followed by silica (22.38%) and alumina (19.95%). Titanium oxide was weak (0.73%). The Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) and the Mineralogical Index of Alteration (MIA) shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> were very high (&gt;99%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Behavior of Trace Elements</title><p>Trace element analyses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) generally revealed low values of various elements. However, there was a certain number of variations in content from one facies to another one. This is the case of Zr, Cr and V on one hand and Ba, Ga, Nb and Pb on the other hand. In Scoriaceous facies, Zr, Cr and V contents ranged from 189 to 337 ppm; Ba, Ga, Nb and Pb from 22.58 to 134.5 ppm, with a more significant proportion of Ba (134.5 ppm) in the formation outcropped at the foot of the hill (SCF1). Except V, which is totally lack, trace elements were generally well distributed in the pisolitic facies. The values ranged from 396 to 427 ppm in the case of Zr and from 510 to 744 ppm in the case of Cr. Ba was fairly low (8.7 to 21.7 ppm) whereas Ga and Nb as well as Ni display average proportions exceeding 50 ppm with maxima in Ni (118.1 ppm) in PIF1 sample. Nodular duricrusts generally displayed significant concentrations in Zr and Cr. These levels were more or less important in summit formations (NOT1 and NOT2) than those of mid-slope (NOM1). The values ranged from 344 to 785 ppm for Cr and from 260 to 346 ppm for Zr. V, while lacking in NOT2, is more than 250 ppm in the two other samples. Ba was very concentrated (111.9 ppm) in NOT2. Ga, Nb and Ni presented values greater than 30 ppm. Zr was more concentrated (473 ppm) in the mid-slope massive facies (NOM1) than those of the foot of the slope (236 and 362 ppm). Furthermore, the greatest Cr content was observed in the bottom of the slope formations, namely in the MAF2 sample (809 ppm), which was totally lacking in V. Ga, N and Ni were moderate (an average content of more than 40 ppm) while Ba was weakest (average content less than 20 ppm).</p><p>Concerning profiles, a similar trend was observed. The first profile indicated an average of more or less 300 ppm of Zr, Cr and V (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). These decreased from the top to the bottom level, as well as Ba, Ga and Nb, which increased between 20 and 40 ppm. Ni increased as depth increases with 380.5 ppm in the sample from the bottom level. Cr was the most enriched element (391 ppm) in STL2, followed by V (370 ppm) and Zr (215 ppm) respectively. The other trace elements (Ba, Ga, Nb and Ni) were moderate (17.21 to 32.25ppm) but Ni and Ba were significantly more enriched (71.3 and 65.1 ppm respectively). According to TTL1 sample, V was the most reported trace element (370 ppm) near Cr (208 ppm) and Zr (198 ppm). Ba and Ni were fairly moderate (48.6 and 54.6 ppm respectively), but Ga and Nb were quite weak (23.53 and 18.18 ppm respectively).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Trace elements content (ppm) of the studied formations. (-) = Not detected or below the Detection Limit (D.L), SCT = Scoriaceous facies collected at the top of the hill, SCM = Scoriaceous facies collected at mid-slop, SCF = Scoriaceous facies collected at the foot of the hill, PIF = Pisolitic facies collected at the foot of the hill, NOT = Nodular facies collected at the top of the hill, NOM = Nodular facies collected at mid-slop, MAM = Massive facies collected at mid-slop, MAF = Massive facies collected at the foot of the hill, FTL2 = Level 2 of first trench, FTL3 = Level 3 from first trench, STL2 = Level 2 from second trench, TTL1 = Level 1 from third trench, T = Trench</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Scoriaceous facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pisolitic facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Nodular facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Massive facies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >T1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D.L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCT1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PIF3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOT1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOT2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAM1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAF1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAF2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTL2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTL3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STL2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TTL1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Be</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >744</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >785</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ga</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Li</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.521</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.491</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.754</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.983</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.912</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.297</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.414</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.452</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.959</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.565</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.526</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.572</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.227</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >255.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >316.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >356.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;370</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >337</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >473</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Relationship among Chemical Components</title><p>Chemical elements may have certain relationships during the bauxitization process. Binary plots among the major elements indicate strongly positive correlations between Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>; Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub>; Nb and TiO<sub>2</sub>; Ta and TiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). A moderate positive correlation is observed between Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and MgO whereas negative correlations exist between Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub>, and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. These patterns suggest two groups of components: a first group of positively correlated components including Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3 </sub>vs. TiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(f)), Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(e)), Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. MgO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(d)), Nb vs. TiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(h)) and Ta vs. TiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(i)) and a second group of negatively associated components composed of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)), Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)), Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(c)) and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. Cr (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(g)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Variation of Bauxitic Duricrust Facies</title><p>Weathering of basalts developed during the upper Cretaceous was the origin of concentrated bauxite deposits on the platform of Ngaoundal and Minim-Martap in the Adamawa Region of Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . Morphological facies variation (scoriaceous, nodular, pisolitic and massive) corroborate with the fact that these materials are derived from the erosion and re-sedimentation of older formations and possibly also from eroded bauxitic formations, formed on the exposed platform [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref6">6</xref>] . This degradation process was favored by humid equatorial climate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref21">21</xref>] and tectonic instability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref22">22</xref>] of the region which belongs to the Cameroon volcanic line. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref4">4</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref23">23</xref>] , the African morphologies depend on the progressive erosion and peneplanation which are favored by the hydrographic network which generally get along with the faults and are responsible for the reduction and variations of the thickness of the duricrust formations above the plateaus and on the flanks of hills. The white and gray punctuation displayed by certain bauxitic facies would result from the weathering of plagioclases, substituted in volume and form by gibbsite and ferruginous minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . The transformation of the bauxitic formations into the pisolitic bauxitic facies by individualisation of pisoliths derived from ferruginous spots and nodules, led to the development of a thick bauxitic mantle with pisolitic facies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref24">24</xref>] . The landscape and the pedological coverage of the study area reveal that the hills are very narrow with very steep slopes, unlike the plateaus where the slopes are slightly inclined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . The presence of the gibbsitic-dominated duricrust has contributed to the development of a thick soil-cover at the level of the hills, a compact pedologic horizon at the top of the plateaus and in the whole of a spotted horizon rich in quartz reflect the climatic contrast of the locality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Mineralogical and Geochemical Transformations</title><p>Bauxitic mantles that are regularly located at the top of hills and interfluves in the Ngaoundal area constitute a residual surface dominated by duricrust formations. These were probably formed during the upper Cretaceous under contrasted climate in an oxidizing-leaching environment that favored the crystallization of hematite more than goethite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref26">26</xref>] . The sustained presence of hematite mainly in the nodular and massive duricrust facies implies neutral to sligthly alkaline conditions in a later stage of bauxite formation. Moreover, its presence implies epigenetic processes during bauxitization, including Fe-mobilization, Fe-reprecipitation as amorphous Fe-hydroxides and subsequent recrystallization to hematite during diagenesis. In this context, hematite was shown to form contemporaneously to Al-oxyhydroxides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref27">27</xref>] . The residual phase of the altered basalt cover included iron hydroxides (hematite, goethite), clay minerals, kaolinite and a considerable volume of aluminium-free hydroxides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . Thus, lateritization in Ngaoundal favored bauxitization through aluminium mobilization with individualization of the iron bearing lateritic bauxites which develop thick bauxitic mantles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref8">8</xref>] . This suggests that bauxitization in this environment may correspond to intense hydrolysis leading to allitization with losses of SiO<sub>2</sub> and various cations, and monosialitization leading to the formation of kaolinite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref28">28</xref>] . This intense weathering leads to the accumulation of significant immobile elements as Al, Fe and Si.</p><p>Climate conditions during bauxitic formations control the distribution of chemical elements between textural components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref29">29</xref>] . For the major elements, we found the usual pattern of lateritic weathering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref21">21</xref>] : progressive silica leaching, almost total alkali and alkaline earths leaching, gradual accumulation of iron and aluminum. Some elements are mostly concentrated in the matrix while other elements are associated with the ooids. This is the case of SiO<sub>2</sub> which is generally confined in the matrix, whereas Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, TiO<sub>2</sub>, and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> are mostly associated with the ooids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref31">31</xref>] . However, the SiO<sub>2</sub> enrichment of the Sardinia bauxites is considered to be due to the alteration process caused by the circulation of Si-rich solutions, which caused the re-silicification of hematite as a consequence of the emplacement of Tertiary volcanites on top of the bauxites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref28">28</xref>] . Relatively high iron contents (average value of 23%) indicate that these belong to iron-rich bauxites. Thus, the Ngaoundal bauxite deposits can be classified as ferruginous lateritic bauxites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref32">32</xref>] . The most abundant trace elements (Zr, Cr and V), represent the elements that are not very mobile during alteration, and are most often enriched in bauxites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>In these formations, some correlations between major and trace elements were noted. Thus, a significantly negative correlation was observed in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagrams (r = 0.815) and slightly negative between Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (r = 0.418). On the other hand, the correlation was significantly positive for Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (r = 0.754); Nb and TiO<sub>2</sub> (r = 0.893) and Ta and TiO<sub>2</sub> (r = 0.830). Similarly, it was also positive for Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and MgO (r = 0.504) and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> (r = 0.830), but not significant. During the bauxitization process, a fractionation of major, minor and trace elements takes place [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref31">31</xref>] . It is widely accepted that the study of immobile elements is a powerful tool to unravel the parental material and the genetic history of bauxites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref33">33</xref>] . Therefore, an identification of mobile and immobile elements during the bauxitization process is of vital importance. Furthermore, it has been shown that titanium oxides in bauxite can accumulate substantial amounts of Nb, Ta, Th [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref34">34</xref>] . In this study, the observed positive correlation between TiO<sub>2 </sub>and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> might be attributed to the fact that Al-oxyhydroxides have been found to contain Ti-nanominerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref27">27</xref>] . Trace elements, such as Nb, Ta, Zr, Th or U show a good correlation with TiO<sub>2</sub> and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, meaning that they also behaved rather immobile during bauxitization. The good correlation between Nb and Ta with TiO<sub>2</sub> indicate that these elements are hosted in Ti-oxide phases within bauxitic samples. These correlations are typical of strongly weathered deposits where immobile elements accumulate and mobile elements are leached out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref35">35</xref>] . This is also confirmed by the low contents of alkali and alkaline earth metals, which are highly mobile during chemical weathering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref37">37</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Weathering Level of the Studied Materials</title><p>Allitization, which refers to lateritization process, may be related to abundant rainfall (around 1500 to 1700 mm mean annual rainfall), dense and dendritic hydrographic network and steep slopes which favored a highly leaching milieu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref38">38</xref>] . Bauxitization process of Ngaoundal duricrust formations was implemented by factors such as deferrugenization-ferrugenization, desilisification, and fluctuation of underground water table level. Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) and Mineralogical Index of Alteration (MIA) derived from major element composition of the studied bauxites, showed extremely high values (&gt;99). This is caused by the intense weathering resulted from high temperature, rainfall and regional groundwater system in the region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref39">39</xref>] . The consequence is almost total exportation of alkali and alkaline earths elements (Na, Ca, Mg, K) and the accumulation of an important aluminum enrichment as well as abundant accumulation of gibbsite.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Implication of the Study on Mining Perspectives</title><p>The Cameroonian territory is full of more than fifty mineral substances and about 50% of the national territory has been explored. Between 1960 and 1990, the government with their international partners like UNDP and BRGM carried out studies in order to investigate the mineral potential of the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref40">40</xref>] . Nowadays, the government through their development strategy (SND30), oriented projects on mining. This is emphasized by the creation of SONAMINES which is in charge of mining exploitation. But at first, the need of understanding processes which control establishment of minerals and relationship with environment are important for sustainable management.</p><p>The geology of Cameroon is favorable to the mineralization of substances as precious metals, base metals and rare metals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . Indeed, in Cameroon, lateritic weathering and erosion concentrated both metallic and non-metallic ores, as well as valuable substances, of which main indices and deposits have been identified. This is the case of bauxite deposits from Ngaoundal and Minim Martap in Adamawa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] and from FongoTongo in the Western region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref6">6</xref>] . For example, 554 million tons of bauxite reserves have been found in the Adamawa region as of 2009 and 50 million tons in FongoTongo and 4 million tons in Foumban [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref8">8</xref>] . According to experts, Cameroon is the second largest bauxite reserves deposit in Africa.</p><p>Duricrusts described indicated the successive steps in the establishment of the bauxitic formations in Cameroon in general and in the Adamawa region in particular. The alteration of basaltic rocks of the Adamawa Plateau resulted in the deposit of alumina-rich bauxites in the high landscapes notably those of Ngaoundal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref12">12</xref>] . The study revealed interesting bauxite deposits in Ngaoundal area, thereby allowing the mining properties of the studied formations to be established. Indeed, significant concentrations of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (over 45% in grade) on the one hand, and gibbsite (more than 90% in grade) on the other hand, notably in the most abundant scoriaceous duricrust facies in this area, sufficiently indicate favorable mining perspectives. The mineralogical and geochemical investigations conducted in this study allowed for a better assessment of industrial and technological properties of the bauxitic formations developed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130670-ref41">41</xref>] . However, further investigations including drillings and prospecting wells are required for establishing the geologic properties of deposit.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>This study aimed to assess the behavior and the distribution of major and trace elements within studied formations in evaluating their mining potential. It should be noted that the study highlighted some points to be retained:</p><p>Four main facies of duricrust were identified and characterized: scoriaceous, pisolitic, nodular and vacuolar. They outcropped in blocks, from the top to the bottom of the hill, but the scoriaceous facies was the most widespread. The weathered profiles described enclosed in their various layers, slabs of duricrust with properties similar to those of the other layers.</p><p>After analytical procedures, it can be concluded that geochemical analyses revealed significant contents of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> notably in the scoriaceous facies, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub>, limited quantities of alkalis (Na<sub>2</sub>O, K<sub>2</sub>O) and alkaline earths metals (MgO, CaO) and low values of trace elements. Mineralogical investigations showed very high concentrations of gibbsite mainly in the scoriaceous facies, good contents of kaolinite and moderate proportions of hematite. Allitization and monosiallitization are the two crystallochemical phenomena responsible for mineral development during weathering of the studied duricrust.</p><p>The study showed a mining interest of bauxitic duricrust, although it needs to be supplemented by further investigations based on the establishment of ore deposits and sampling in other localities where outcrops have been observed. This would enable us to establish a sufficient database to better understand the mining potential of the Ngaoundal area. It can therefore be concluded that the bauxitic mantles in Ngaoundal and surroundings, through their distribution in the landscape, their vertical organization and the evolution of bauxitic facies, contributed significantly to the overall levelling of the Adamawa plateau.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sini, A., Boukari, H., Balla, O.A.D., Beral, D., Aw&#233;, S.W., Basga, S.D. and Nguetnkam, J.P. (2024) Mobility of Major and Trace Elements during the Bauxitization Processes in Ngaoundal Area (Adamawa Cameroon): Implication on Mining Perspectives. Open Journal of Geology, 14, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2024.141005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130670-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, X., Wang, Q.F., Deng, J., Zhang, Q., Sun, S. and Meng, J. (2010) Mineralogical and Geochemical Investigations of the Dajia Salento-Type Bauxite Deposits, Western Guangxi, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 105, 137-152.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2010.04.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, F.M. (2004) Availability of Bauxite Reserves. Natural Resources Research, 13, 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NARR.0000046918.50121.2e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nkouandou, O.F., Ngounouno, I. and Deruelle, B. (2010) Géochimie des laves basaltiques récentes des zones Nord et Est de Ngaoundéré (Cameroun, Plateau de l’Adamaoua, Afrique centrale): Pétrogenèse et nature de la source. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 4, 984-1003.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i4.63038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WRB (2014) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106, FAO. (Update 2015)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ufer, K., Stanjek, H., Roth, G., Dohrmann, R., Kleeberg, R. and Kaufhold, S. (2008) Quantitive Phase Analysis of Bentonites by the Rietveld Method. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nesbitt, H.W. and Young, G.M. (1982) Early Proterozoic Climates and Plate Motions Inferred from Major Element Chemistry of Lutites. Nature, 299, 715-717.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/299715a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Price Jason, R. and VelbelMichael, A. (2003) Chemical Weathering Indices Applied to Weathering Profiles Developed on Heterogeneous Felsic Metamorphic Parent Rocks. Chemical Geology, 202, 397-416.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2002.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tardy, Y., Melfi, A.J. and Valeton, I. (1988) Climats et Paléo-climats Tropicaux Péri Atlantiques. Role des Facteurs Climatiques et Thermodynamiques (Température et Activité de l’Eau) sur la Répartition et la Composition Minéralogique des Bauxites et des Cuirasses Ferrugineuses au Brésil et en Afrique. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 306, 289-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valeton, I. and Melfi, A.J. (1988) Distribution Pattern of Bauxites in Cataguases Area (SE Brazil) in Relation to Lower Tertiary Paleogeography and Younger Tectonics. Sciences Géologiques, Bulletins et Mémoires, 41, 85-98.  
https://doi.org/10.3406/sgeol.1988.1783</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nono, A., Likeng, J.D.H., Wabo, H., Tabue Youmbi, G. and Biaya, S. (2009) Influence de la nature lithologique et des structures géologiques sur la qualité et la dynamique des eaux souterraines dans les hauts plateaux de l’Ouest-Cameroun. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 3, 218-239.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v3i2.44516</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Churchman, G.J. (2000) The Alteration and Formation of Soil Minerals by Weathering. In: Sumner, M.E., Ed., Handbook of Soil Science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 3-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beauvais, A. and Tardy, Y. (1993) Degradation and Dismantling of Iron Crust under Climatic Changes in Central Africa. Chemical Geology, 107, 277-280.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(93)90190-T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tardy, Y. and Nahon, D. (1985) Geochemistry of Laterites Stability of Al-Goethite, Al-Hematite and Fe-Kaolinite in Bauxites and Ferricretes: An Approach to of Concretion Formation. American Journal Sciences, 285, 865-903.  
https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.285.10.865</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gamaletsos, P.N., Godelitsas, A., Kasama, T., Church, N.S., Douvalis, A.P., Gottlicher, J., Steininger, R., Boubnov, A., Pontikes, Y., Tzamos, E., et al. (2017) Nano-Mineralogy and -Geochemistry of High-Grade Diasporic Karst-Type Bauxite from Parnassos-Ghiona Mines, Greece. Ore Geology Reviews, 84, 228-244.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Certini, G., Wilson, M.J., Hillier, S.J., Fraser, A.R. and Delbos, E. (2006) Mineral Weathering in Trachydacitic-Derived Soils and Saprolites Involving Formation of Embryonic Halloysite and Gibbsite at Mt Amiata, Central Italy. Geoderma, 133, 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.07.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mongelli, G., Buccione, R. and Sinisi, R. (2015) Genesis of Autochthonous and Allochthonous Apulian Karst Bauxites (Southern Italy): Climate Constraints. Sedimentary Geology, 325, 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.06.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boni, M., Rollinson, G., Mondillo, N., Balassone, G. and Santoro, L. (2013) Quantitative Mineralogical Characterization of Karst Bauxite Deposits in the Southern Apennines, Italy. Economic Geology, 108, 813-833.  
https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.108.4.813</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mongelli, G., Boni, M., Buccione, R. and Sinisi, R. (2014) Geochemistry of the Apulian Karst Bauxites (Southern Italy): Chemical Fractionation and Parental Affinities. Ore Geology Reviews, 63, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.04.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Momo, N.M., Tematio, P. and Yemefack, M. (2012) Multi-Scale Organization of the Doumbouo-Fokoué Bauxites Ore Deposits (West Cameroon): Implication to the landscape Lowering. Open Journal of Geology, 2, 14-24.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2012.21002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mameli, P., Mongelli, G., Oggiano, G. and Dinelli, E. (2007) Geological, Geochemical and Mineralogical Features of Some Bauxite Deposits from Nurra (Western Sardinia, Italy): Insights on Conditions of Formation and Parental Affinity. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 96, 887-902.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-006-0142-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gamaletsos, P., Godelitsas, A., Mertzimekis, T.J., Gottlicher, J., Steininger, R., Xanthos, S., Berndt, J., Klemme, S., Kuzmin, A. and Bardossy, G. (2011) Thorium Partitioning in Greek Industrial Bauxite Investigated by Synchrotron Radiation and Laser-Ablation Techniques. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 269, 3067-3073.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2011.04.061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Putzolu, F., Papa, A.P., Mondillo, N., Boni, M., Balassone, G. and Mormone, A. (2018) Geochemical Characterization of Bauxite Deposits from the Abruzzi Mining District (Italy). Minerals, 8, Article 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8070298</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gu, J., Huang, Z., Fan, H., Jin, Z., Yan, Z. and Zhang, J. (2013) Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Genesis of Lateritic Bauxite Deposits in the Wuchuan-Zheng’an-Daozhen Area, Northern Guizhou Province, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 130, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamaniana, H., Ahmadnejad, F. and Zarasvandi, A. (2016) Mineralogical and Geochemical Investigations of the Mombi Bauxite Deposit, Zagros Mountains, Iran. Geochemistry, 76, 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2015.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aristizabal, E., Roser, B. and Yokota, S. (2005) Tropical Chemical Weathering of Hillslope Deposits and Bedrock Source in the Aburra Valley, Northern Colombian Andes. Engineering Geology, 81, 389-406.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hurst, V. and Pickering, S. (1997) Origin and Classification of Coastal Plain Kaolin, Southeastern USA, and the Role of Groundwater and Microbial Action. Clays and Clay Minerals, 45, 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1997.0450215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BRGM (2010) Quelles recherches pour l’avenir? symposium franco-allemand sur l’approvisionnement de l’Europe en matières premières non-énergétiques, document de travail.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, X.F., Wang, Q.F., Feng, Y.W., Li, Z. and Cai, S.H. (2013) Genesis of the Guangou Karstic Bauxite Deposit in Western Henan, China. Ore Geology Reviews, 55, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dawai, D., Tchameni, R., Bascou, J., Awe, W.S., FossoTchunte, P.M. and Bouchez, J.L. (2017) Microstructures and Magnetic Fabrics of the Ngaoundere Granite Pluton (Cameroon): Implications to the Late-Pan-African Evolution of Central Cameroon Shear Zone. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 129, 887-897.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.02.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ganwa, A.A., Siebel, W., Frisch, W., Shang, C.K. and Ekodeck, G.E. (2011) Geochemistry and Geochronology of the Méigangametadiorite: Implications on the Timing of D2 Deformational Phase in Adamawa Yadé Domain in Cameroon. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 5, 1754-1767.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v5i4.37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njanko, T., Nédélec, A. and Affaton, P. (2006) Synkematic High-K Calc-Alkaline Plutons Associated with the Pan-African Central Cameroon Shear Zone (W-Tibati Area): Petrology and Geodynamic Significance. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 494-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eno Belinga, S.M. (1972) Altération des roches basaltiques et le processus de bauxitisation dans l’Adamaoua (Cameroun). Thèse, Université Paris VI, Paris, 26-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yonkeu, S. (1993) Végétation des paturages de l’Adamaoua (Cameroun): Ecologie et potentialités pastorales. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Renne I, N° d’ordre 863, 213 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchotsoua, M., Esoh, E., Mohamadou, G. and Ngana, J.-P. (1998) Diagnostic de l’état de l’environnement de Ngaoundéré et contribution pour une approche de gestion. Annales de la FALSH, 3, 99-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sojien, T.M., Mamdem, T.E.L., Wouatong, L.S.A. and Bitom, D.L. (2018) Mineralogical, Goechemical and Distribution Study of Bauxites in the Locality of Bangam and Environs (West Cameroun). Earth Sciences Research, 7, 117-130.  
https://doi.org/10.5539/esr.v7n1p117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchamba, A.B., Yongue, R., Melo, U.C., Kamseu, E., Njoya, D. and Njopwouo, D. (2008) Caractérisation de la bauxite de Haléo Danielle (Minim-Martap, Cameroun) en vue de son utilisation industrielle dans les matériaux à haute teneur en alumine. Silicates Industriels, 73, 77-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sini, A., Basga, S.D., Temga, J.P. and Nguetnkam, J.P. (2020) The Influence of Topography in Duricrust Development in the Ngaoundal-Dir Section of Central Cameroon: Understanding Morphological, Mineralogical and Geochemical Transformations. Scientific African, 10, e00655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Momo, N.M., Beauvais, A., Tematio, P., Ambrosi, J.-P., Yemefack, M., et al. (2019) Lateritic Weathering of Trachyte, and Bauxite Formation in West Cameroon: Morphological and Geochemical Evolution. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 205, Article 106324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.06.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bitom, D.L., Volkoff, B., Beauvais, A., Seyler, F. and Ndjigui, P.D. (2004) Role des héritages latéritiques et du niveau des nappes dans l’évolution des modelés et des sols en zone intertropicale forestière humide. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 336, 1161-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2004.03.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Temgoua, E., Bitom, D., Bilong, P., Lucas, Y. and Pfeifer, H.R. (2002) Démantèlement des Paysages Cuirassés Anciens en Zones Forestières Tropicales d’Afrique Centrale: Formation des Accumulations Ferrugineuses Actuelles en Bas de Versants. Compte Rendu Géoscience, 334, 537-543.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0713(02)01793-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130670-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abedini, A. and Calagari, A.A. (2014) REE Geochemical Characteristics of Titanium-Rich Bauxites: The Permian Kanigorgeh Horizon, NW Iran. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 23, 513-532. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1404-11</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>