<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2024.151002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-130464</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Influence of Topography on the Distribution and Structure of Woody Plants in the Senegalese Sahel (Sandy Ferlo)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moustapha</surname><given-names>Bassimbe Sagna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aïssatou</surname><given-names>Ndong Thiam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khoudia</surname><given-names>Niang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oumar</surname><given-names>Sarr</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aly</surname><given-names>Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sekouna</surname><given-names>Diatta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daouda</surname><given-names>Ngom</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aliou</surname><given-names>Guissé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>IRL 3189 “Environment, Health, Society”, Tessekere Human Environment Observatory (Senegal), Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agroforestry, Assane Seck University, Ziguinchor, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Agronomy and Plant Production, El Hadji Ibrahima Niasse University, Kaolack, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study describes the floristic composition and structure of a woody stand in the Senegalese Sahel, paying particular attention to the edaphic factors of its floristic composition. A stratified inventory considering the different relief units was adopted. Woody vegetation was surveyed using a dendrometric approach. The results obtained show that the flora is dominated by a few species adapted to drought, such as 
  Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del., 
  Calotropis procera Ait. and 
  Boscia senegalensis
   (Pers.). The distribution of this flora and the structure of the ligneous plants are linked to the topography. In the lowlands, the flora is more diversified and the ligneous plants reach their optimum level of development compared with the higher relief areas. In the lowlands, there are a few woody species which, in the past, were indicative of better climatic conditions.
   
  These are Anogeissus leiocarpus (DC.), Commiphora africana (A. Rich.), Feretia apodanthera Del., Loeseneriella africana (A. Smith), Mitragyna inermis (Willd.) and Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich). It is important that their reintroduction into reforestation projects takes account of their edaphic preference.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Woody Plants</kwd><kwd> Distribution</kwd><kwd> Topography</kwd><kwd> Ferlo</kwd><kwd> Senegal</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In semi-arid regions, the distribution of vegetation reflects natural variations in the physical environment, in particular soil type and rainfall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref1">1</xref>] . The nuances of the water regime are at the root of a strong differentiation of plant formations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref3">3</xref>] accentuated by the topography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref4">4</xref>] . Under conditions of ecological constraint, niche differentiation remains essential for the survival of woody plants, particularly those that are most demanding in terms of certain mineral constituents in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref5">5</xref>] . Following the repeated failures recorded during silvicultural reforestation and revegetation operations in the Sahelian zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref6">6</xref>] , the edaphic ranges of species distribution in the bio-pedoclimatic subdivisions of the Sahel need to be better known. In the Sahel region of Senegal, specifically in the sandy part, the variability of environmental characteristics in relation to the distribution of woody species has not been sufficiently studied; the existing data are very old [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref9">9</xref>] . The most recent data are based on exhaustive descriptions of the geographical distribution of woody species without taking into account the variability linked to topography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref13">13</xref>] . On the other hand, the influence of geomorphology on the distribution of vegetation has been highlighted in the south, in the Sudano-Sahelian and Sudanian zones of Senegal by Andrieu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref14">14</xref>] . This study was carried out in northern Senegal, in the context of the Great Green Wall (GGW). The GGW is a transcontinental project that aims to reforest 15 million hectares in a strip 7700 km long and 15 km wide between Dakar and Djibouti [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>To optimise the success of phyto-restoration operations, the experts were asked to refine their research into the ecology of existing species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref6">6</xref>] . The present study is therefore justified by the need to update existing data and to clearly identify the edaphic preferences of woody species in order to contribute to the development of management tools in the Great Green Wall zone. Specifically, the study will describe the floristic composition, distribution and structure of the woody stands, paying particular attention to the topographical determinants of this distribution.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Study Area</title><p>The Ferlo is one of Senegal’s largest climatic zones, located in the Senegalese Sahel and covering an area of around 70,000 km<sup>2</sup>, or 28% of the national territory (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The climate of the Ferlo is typically Sahelian, with two alternating seasons, a rainy season and a dry season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref10">10</xref>] ; the rainy season lasts between two and three months (between July and September) and is characterized by annual rainfall of between 200 and 400 mm/year, accompanied by a high degree of instability in time, estimated at between 30% and 40% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref10">10</xref>] . Rainfall is one of the factors that determine the dynamics of ecosystems in this zone; the normal rainfall, which was 500 mm between 1931 and 1960 in the Senegalese sahel, has migrated more than 200 km southwards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref15">15</xref>] . Temperatures average between 35˚C and 43˚C, reaching 45˚C in some places [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>The relief of the sandy Ferlo combines low, monotonous plateaus with sandy</p><p>accumulations forming dunes separated by shallows occupied by temporary pools during the rainy season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref17">17</xref>] . This part of the Sahel is occupied by tropical ferruginous soils with a sandy to sandy-clay texture. These soils are poorly leached, red or ochre in colour and poor in organic matter.</p><p>At the end of the rainy season, the vegetation takes the form of a continuous herbaceous carpet dotted with frequently thorny trees and shrubs that never form a continuous stratum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref18">18</xref>] , dominated by Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del, Boscia senegalensis (Pers.) Lam. Ex Poir, Acacia senegal (L.), Acacia tortilis (Forsk.) Hayne ssp. raddiana (Savi) Brenan, and Calotropis procera (Aiton) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The study was carried out in the sandy Ferlo on a section located between 15˚04' and 15˚59' North latitude and between 15˚42' and 15˚20' West longitude. Five sites arranged along two transects were defined between isohyets 300 and 400 mm: a N.NE-S.SW transect, Widou Thiengoly - Tess&#233;k&#233;r&#233; - Labgar, and a W.N-E.SE transect, Widou Thiengoly - Kamb - D&#233;ali (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Wood Inventory</title><p>The dendrometric vegetation survey method was applied to woody stands. The sampling unit was a 2500 m<sup>2</sup> plot, as recommended by Boudet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref20">20</xref>] for Sahelian</p><p>ecosystems. In each inventory plot, all woody plants with a circumference of 10 cm or more at 30 cm from the ground were identified and measured. The choice of this level of measurement was dictated by the fact that many shrubs are branched below 1.3 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref21">21</xref>] , which is the height at which the measurement is usually taken. Individuals with a circumference of less than 10 cm are regenerated. The scientific names of the species have been transcribed using the Flore in Senegal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref22">22</xref>] , and updated according to the enumeration of the Plants with Flowers of Tropical Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Given the variability associated with topography, stratified sampling based on geomorphological units was used, as recommended by Gounot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref24">24</xref>] . It also takes into account the representativeness of the relief units. On each geomorphological formation, a survey was carried out at random and successively on each topographical unit (flats, slopes, shallows and hillocks). The sample consisted of 144 plots, including 50 on the flats and 28 on each of the other units (slopes, shallows and knolls). The imbalance observed in this sample can be explained by the greater frequency of the flats compared with the other topographical units.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Processing</title><p>The floristic list was drawn up according to the different taxonomic groups (families, genera and species). Real (D) and relative (Dr) densities were calculated using the following formulae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref25">25</xref>] :</p><p>D = N i / S</p><p>where Ni is the total number of animals in sample i and S is the area of the sample in ha.</p><p>Dr ( % ) = ( n / N ) / 1 00</p><p>where n is the number of individuals of one species and N is the number of individuals of all species in the stand.</p><p>Cover (R) is estimated by the circular model of average tree crown diameter. It is calculated from the following formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref25">25</xref>] :</p><p>R ( % ) = ( ∑ R h / S ) &#215; 100 : R h = π &#215; ( D m 2 / 4 )</p><p>where Rh is the surface area of the aerial canopy (in m<sup>2</sup>), Dm the average crown diameter (in m) and S the surface area of the sample considered in ha.</p><p>The basal area (St), which corresponds to the sum of the cross-sections of the trees at 0.30 m from the ground, is calculated using the following formula:</p><p>∑ a = 1 n ( Ca 2 / 4 π )</p><p>where Ca is the circumference of the tree at 0.30 m above the ground</p><p>The structure of the woody stand was assessed through the distribution of individuals in height classes and circumference classes.</p><p>To highlight the topographical determinants of the distribution of woody plants, data from soil analysis and vegetation surveys were subjected to Correspondence Factor Analysis (CFA) using R software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Floristic Composition and Importance</title><p>The surveys revealed 35 species, unevenly distributed between the different topographical units. In the shallows and flats, the species richness is higher (27 and 24 species respectively) than on the slopes and hillsides, which contain 13 and 11 species respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). A few species of this woody flora make up most of the individuals in the stand studied (column P in the table). These are Balanites aegyptiaca (57.5%), Calotropis procera (14.1%), Acacia tortilis raddiana (6.6%), Leptadenia hastata (5.2%) and Boscia senegalensis (4.6%). Out of a total of 2013 individuals inventoried in the stand, half are found in the lowlands (50.6%), followed by the flats (30.5%). Slopes and knolls are less populated (8.6% and 10.2% respectively).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Spatial Distribution of Woody Flora</title><p>The relationships between topographical units and floristic composition were studied using Correspondence Factorial Analysis (CFA). It is important to note, however, that species represented by 1 to 3 individuals were not taken into</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> List of woody species surveyed and frequency (in %) in relation to the stand as a whole</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Famille</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genre Esp&#232;ce</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANACARDIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sbir</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APOCYNACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adenium obesum (Forsk.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aob</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >ASCLEPIADACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calotropis procera Ait.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cpro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leptadenia hastata (Pers.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lhas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leptadenia pyrotechnica (Forsk.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lpyr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BALANITACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Del.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BIGNONIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stereospermu kunthianum Cham.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOMBACACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adansonia digitata (L.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BURSERACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commiphora africana (A. Rich.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cafr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CAESALPINIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bauhinia rufescens Lam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bruf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pilostigma reticulatum (DC.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pret</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tamarindus indica L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tind</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAPPARIDACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boscia senegalensis (Pers.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bsen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >COMBRETACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anogeissus leiocarpus (DC.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretum glutinosum perr.ex DC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cglu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretum aculeatum Vent.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cacu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretum micranthum G. Don</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cmic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guiera senegalensis J.F.Gmel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gsen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Terminalia avicennioides G.et Perr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tavi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EPHORBIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jatropha chavalieri Beille</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jche</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIPPOCRATEACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loeseneriella africana (A. Smith)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lafr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >FABACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acacia senegal (L.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acacia seyal Del.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acacia tortilis raddiana (Forst.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acacia nilotica (L.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acacia pennata (L.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dichrostachys cinerea (L.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dcin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Faidherbia albida (Del.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Falb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dalbergia melanoxylon G. Perr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dmel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MERISPERMACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tinospora bakis (A. Rich)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tbak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RHAMNACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zmau</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >RUBIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feretia apodanthera Del.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fapo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mitragyna inermis (Willd.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TILIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grewia bicolor Juss.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gbic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >STERCULIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sterculia setigera (Del.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sset</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Number of species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Proportion of woody trees (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>L= Lowlands; F = Flats; S = Slopes; M= Mounds W= Woody stand.</p><p>account, since this method does not provide sufficient information on their ecological preference. The rarest of these ligneous species are represented by one individual in our sample. This stand is made up of trees (Stereospermu kunthianum, Tamarindus indica, Loeseneriella africana and Sterculia setigera) and shrubs (Combretum aculeatum, Combretum micranthum, Jatropha chavalieri, Acacia pennata, Tinospora bakis). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the proportion of information contained in the CFA axes. The first two axes, which account for 95.3% of the total variability, were selected. They contributed 56.4% and 38.4% respectively.</p><p>The distribution of species in the stand in this plane shows fairly clear discrimination between three groups of species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>The plane formed by the first two axes of the CFA clearly distinguishes three groups: group 1 (Gr1), which can be identified at the negative abscissas of F1 and the positive abscissas of axis 2, group 2 (Gr2), which can be identified at the positive abscissas of F1 and F2, and group 3 (Gr3), located at the negative abscissas of F2.</p><p>Group 1 (Gr1) includes species with a clear preference for lowlands: Acacia nilotica [Ani], Anogeissus leiocarpus [Alei], Feretia apodanthera [Fapo], Grewia bicolor [Gbic], Guiera senegalensis [Gsen], Mitragyna inermis [Mine], and Terminalia avicennioides [Tavi].</p><p>Group 2 (Gr2) features two species found mainly on hillocks and slopes: Adenium obesum [Aob], Acacia senegal [Asen], Boscia senegalensis [Bsen], Leptadenia pyrotechnica [Lpyr], Leptadenia hastata [Lhas] and Sclerocarya birrea [Sbir].</p><p>Group 3 (Gr3) is made up of flat areas, which are the preferred habitats of Combretum glutinosum [Cglu], Commiphora africana [Cafr], Dalbergia melanoxylon [Dmel], Faidherbia albida [Falb] and Zizyphus mauritiana [Zmau].</p><p>The CFA brings together a large number of stand species at the center of the factorial plane. These are species that colonize several of the topographical units at least to some extent. These are Adansonia digitata [Adig], Acacia seyal [Asey], Acacia tortilis raddiana [Arad], Balanites aegyptiaca [Beag], and Calotropis procera [Cpro].</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Densities, Basal Areas and Cover</title><p>Some information on stand density, basal area and cover is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Values with different letters are statistically different according to the KRUSKAL-WALLIS test (significant differences for p-value &lt; 0.05). Only trees with a trunk circumference greater than 10 cm at 30 cm above ground are considered.</p><p>The mean values for density, basal area and woody cover are higher in the shallows and on the flats than on the slopes and knolls. They are also higher than the averages obtained for the entire stand in the study area, indicating the relatively high maturity of the woody species in these two topographical units.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Horizontal and Vertical Stratification of Woody Plants</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> show, for each topographical unit respectively, the distribution of ligneous plants according to their circumference and height.</p><p>The histograms obtained indicate that the distribution of woody plants according to their structure is dependent on topography. These distributions are of three types:</p><p>- Bell-shaped in the shallows and on the slopes. The middle height and trunk diameter classes are the most abundant, indicating a lack of stand renewal.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average values for density, basal area and cover as a function of the topographical unit considered</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Density (individuals/ha)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Basal area (m<sup>2</sup>/ha)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cover (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total stand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 &#177; 87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20 &#177; 2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6 &#177; 9.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Topographic unit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lowlands</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262 &#177; 84<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1 &#177; 5.25<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.7 &#177; 15<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flats</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155 &#177; 44<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.74 &#177; 3.10<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2 &#177; 7.8<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slopes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 &#177; 31<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64 &#177; 0.54<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6 &#177; 3.6<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mounds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 &#177; 42<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 1.4<sup>d</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>- Asymmetrical, with low-value classes over-represented on the flats. The shrub layer is predominant here. This type of distribution indicates active stand renewal.</p><p>- Erratic, “jagged”, on the knolls, indicating a lack of individuals in several circumference and height classes.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>According to our counts, the flora of the Ferlo zone studied contains 35 woody species. This flora is dominated by Acacia tortilis raddiana, Balanites aegyptiaca, Calotropis procera and Boscia senegalensis, which account for more than 60% of the individuals in the stand. According to Jauffret [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref26">26</xref>] , this imbalance in species structure is an indicator of the fragility of an ecosystem. In the Ferlo, the abundance of these species can be explained by their ability to adapt to climatic constraints and human pressures. Balanites aegyptiaca has small, deciduous, leathery, pubescent leaves and thorny branches that actively photosynthesise throughout the year, while Boscia senegalensis has leathery, evergreen leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref7">7</xref>] to effectively combat excessive transpiration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref28">28</xref>] . Poupon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref7">7</xref>] gave these two species a high degree of sclerophyllousness (0.84 for Balanites aegyptiaca and 1.24 for Boscia senegalensis).</p><p>Their great ecological plasticity also explains their ability to occupy different micro-habitats in which conditions are not always optimal for other woody plants. As for Calotropis procera, Hiernaux and Le Houerou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref29">29</xref>] emphasize that its presence is a sign of both intense and continuous grazing; White [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref30">30</xref>] , for his part, considers it to be an indicator of advanced soil degradation.</p><p>Heterogeneity linked to topography has a remarkable influence on the distribution of the flora of the Ferlo. It is thought to be one of the main causes of the differentiation of plant formations in the Sahelian zone. Woody plants thrive in low-lying areas that accumulate more water and organic and mineral matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The woody species that have a preference for these Ferlo microhabitats are: Mitragyna inermis, Feretia apodanthera, Anogeissus leiocarpus, Guiera senegalensis, Grewia bicolor and Acacia seyal. These species are considered by Bille [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref31">31</xref>] as footprints of the Ferlo fertile. Hiernaux and Le Hou&#233;rou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref29">29</xref>] report that they constitute the Sahelian forest formations of clay depressions flooded during the rainy season. During the droughts of the 1970s, 85% of Combretum glutinosum, 62% of Combretum nigricans, 54% of Guiera senegalensis and 96% of Terminalia avicennioides were decimated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref1">1</xref>] . This is why Fall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref13">13</xref>] says that the Combretaceae family is indicative of the bioclimatic transition in the Ferlo. These species declines are compounded by the relatively high mortality of populations of Loeseneriella africana, Stereospermu kunthianum, and Sterculia setigera, Anogeissus leiocarpus, Commiphora africana, Feretia apodanthera, Mitragyna inermis, and Sclerocarya birrea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>Most of these species now find their niche in the lowlands, where they are often represented by a few individuals, while some are extremely rare. According to Barry et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref33">33</xref>] , lowlands and valleys can serve as refuge areas for drought-sensitive species. During periods of drought, the distribution of these species may be limited to the valleys; this could encourage recolonization of the other relief units when rainfall becomes sufficient again. In the study area, the maintenance of mesophilous species in the lower relief units could be encouraged by the gradual increase in rainfall observed in the Sahel towards the end of the 1980s, associated with the close alternation of dry and wet years observed in recent years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>However, it is important to point out that the return of rainfall could also be fatal to certain species. Studies have shown that in the Sahelian zone, many woody plants not adapted to increasing flooding die of asphyxiation in low-lying areas and flood valleys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>On the highest topographical units, on the other hand, the soils are very poor, and their structure and texture favour rapid infiltration of water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref18">18</xref>] . Rainfall is generally insufficient to replenish the underground water reserves essential for the survival of most ligneous plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref33">33</xref>] . These topographic levels are colonised by Balanites aegyptiaca, Boscia senegalensis and specifically by species that are highly emblematic of aridity, namely Adenium obesum and Leptadenia pyrotechnica, which have a wider distribution range in the Sahelian zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>From a structural point of view, the variations observed in the horizontal and vertical structure according to the relief units show that ligneous plants require certain conditions to develop. Low-lying areas offer the best conditions for survival, followed by flats and slopes. The erratic type of distribution, which corresponds to the stands on hillocks, could indicate a degradation of the ligneous species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref38">38</xref>] or a disturbance of the ecological niche [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><p>Most of the woody plants have not regenerated. This phenomenon could be explained by the disruption of their ecological niche. In this respect, Aronson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref40">40</xref>] stress the importance of low soil organic matter content in arid and semi-arid zones, as it limits both water infiltration and root penetration of young seedlings. The absence or poor regeneration of certain woody species in the Ferlo could also be explained by the intensity of grazing and the recurrence of bush fires [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref41">41</xref>] . These two factors constitute the major problem in the management of pastoral fodder resources in the Ferlo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130464-ref41">41</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Initially, this study provided descriptive data that could be useful for the proper management and monitoring of the dynamics of woody stands in the Ferlo. The results of this study show that this flora is characterised by the abundance of a few species adapted to drought. However, the gradual increase in rainfall observed towards the end of the 1980s could help to rebalance this floristic composition by reducing the vulnerability of the mesophilous species inventoried in the woody stand.</p><p>The heterogeneity of the environment and the variability linked to the climate have visible influences on the distribution of the flora, in which the intertwined Sahelian and Sudanian floristic components that today make up the Fertile Ferlo are generally distinguished.</p><p>During reforestation operations, several species are planted without taking into account their edaphic preferences. This study shows that reforestation initiatives must take these factors into account to optimise the chances of success.</p><p>The lowlands, which offer more favourable conditions for the regeneration and development of woody plants, must be taken into account in strategies to rehabilitate the ecosystems of the Ferlo in the context of the Great Green Wall.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank the T&#233;ss&#233;k&#233;r&#233; Observatoire Homme Milieu (OHMi), the CNRS IRL 3189, the KLORANE Institute for financial support and the Agence Nationale de la Grande Muraille Verte, which facilitated our fieldwork.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sagna, M.B., Thiam, A.N., Niang, K., Sarr, O., Diallo, A., Diatta, S., Ngom, D. and Guiss&#233;, A. (2024) Influence of Topography on the Distribution and Structure of Woody Plants in the Senegalese Sahel (Sandy Ferlo). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 15, 14-28. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2024.151002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130464-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornet, A. and Poupon, H. (1977) Description of Environmental factors and Vegetation in Five Plots Located along a Climatic Gradient in the Sahelian Zone in Senegal. IFAN Bulletin, 39, 241-302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Breman, H. and De Ridder, N. (1991) Manual on Pastures in the Sahelian Countries. KARTHALA, ACCT, CABO-DLO and CTA, Paris and Wageningen, 485 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, A. (1979) Phyto-Ecological and Phytosociological Approach to Sahelian Pastures in Mali (Gourma Region). Postgraduate Thesis, University of Nice, Nice, 149 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Penning de Vries, F.W.T. and Djitéye, M.A. (1991) La productivité des paturages sahéliens. Pudoc, Wageningen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brouwer, J., Fussell, L.K. and Herrmann, L. (1993) Soil and Crop Growth Micro-Variability in the West African Semi-Arid Tropics: A Possible Risk-Reducing Factor for Subsistence Farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 45, 229-238.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(93)90073-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dia, A. and Duponnois, R. (2010) The Major African Project of the Great Green Wall: Concepts and Implementation. IRD, Marseille, 440 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poupon, H. (1980) Structure and Dynamics of the Woody Stratum of a Sahelian Steppe in Northern Senegal. ORSTOM, “Works and Documents” Collection, 317 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miehe, S. (1990) Inventory and Monitoring of Vegetation in Pastoral Plots in Windou Thiengoly. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), 108 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diouf, M., Akpo, L.E., Rocheteau, A., Do, F., Goudiaby, V. and Diagne, A.L. (2002) Dynamics of the Woody Population of Sahelian Vegetation in North-Senegal (West Africa). Journal of Sciences, 2, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndiaye, O. (2013) Characteristics of the Soils, Flora and Vegetation of Ferlo, Senegal. Doctoral Thesis, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, 114 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndiaye, O., Diallo, A., Sagna, M.B. and Guisse, A. (2013) Floristic Diversity of Woody Populations in Ferlo, Senegal. VertigO, 13.  
https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niang, K., Ndiaye, O., Diallo, A. and Guisse, A. (2014) Flora and Structure of Woody Vegetation along the Great Green Wall in Ferlo, Northern Senegal. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 79, 6938-6946. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v79i1.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fall, A. (2017) From Ferlo to the Peanut Basin (Senegal). Analysis of the Floristic Composition of Vegetation Considered as a Resource and as an Indicator of Socio-Environmental Changes. Physio-Géo, XI, 65-87.  
https://doi.org/10.4000/physio-geo.5265</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrieu, J. (2008) Landscape Dynamics in the Northern Regions of Rivières-du-Sud (Senegal, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau). Thesis, Paris Diderot University, Paris, 534 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndong, J.B. (1996) The Evolution of the Climate of Senegal and the Consequences of the Recent Drought on the Environment. Thesis , Jean Moulin University, Lyon, 501 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faye, N., Diallo, A., Sagna, M.B., Sarr, O., Talla, R., Badji, E.S., Peiry, J.L. and Guissé, A. (2020) Répartition spatiale de la végétation herbacée autour des mares temporaires: Influence des facteurs anthropiques et topographiques à WIDOU THIENGOLY (Ferlo, Nord-Sénégal). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14, 2077-2093. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i6.12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michel, P. (1969) The Basins of the Senegal and Gambia Rivers. Geomorphological Study. State Doctoral Thesis, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 1167 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, A., Faye, M.N., Ndiaye, O. and Guissé, A. (2011) Variations in the Composition of the Herbaceous Vegetation of Acacia senegal (L.) Wild Plantations in the Dahra area (Ferlo). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 5, 1250-1264. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v5i3.72273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akpo, L.E. and Grouzis, M. (1996) Influence of Woody Cover on the Regeneration of Some Sahelian Woody Species (Northern Senegal). Webbia, 50, 247-263.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.1996.10670605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boudet, G. (1984) Manual on Tropical Pastures and Forage Crops. Breeding Manual and Precise, 4th Edition, Ministry of Cooperation, Paris, 254 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bille, J.C. and Poupon, H. (1972) Ecological Research on a Sahelian Savannah of Northern Ferlo, Senegal. Plant Biomass and Net Primary Production. Earth and Life, 26, 366-382. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.1972.4803</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berhaut, J. (1979) Illustrated flora of Senegal. Flight. 6: Linaceae to Nympheaceae. Government of Senegal, Ministry of Rural Development and Hydraulics, Directorate of Water and Forests, Clairafrique édition, Dakar, 636 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lebrun, J.P. and Stork, A.L. (1991-1997) Enumeration of Flowering Plants in Tropical Africa. Conservatory and Botanical Garden of the City of Geneva, Vol. I, II, III and IV, 249, 257, 341 and 712 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gounot, M. (1969) Methods for the Quantitative Study of Vegetation. Masson, Paris, 314 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngom, D., Fall, T., Sarr, O., Diatta, S. and Akpo, L.E. (2013) Ecological Characteristics of the Woody Population of the Ferlo Biosphere Reserve (Northern Senegal). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 65, 5008-5023.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v65i0.89644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jauffret, S. (2001) Validation and Comparison of Various Indicators of Long-Term Changes in Arid Mediterranean Ecosystems: Application to Monitoring Desertification in Southern Tunisia. Thesis, Aix-Marseille III University, Aix-en-Provence, 180 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poupon, H. and Bille, J.C. (1973) Ecological Research on a Shahian Savanna of Ferlo, Septentronal, Senegal: Influence of the Drought of the Year 1972-1973 on the Woody Stratum. ORSTOM, 28, 49-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fournier, C. (1995) Water Functioning of Six Woody Species Coexisting in a Sahelian Savannah (Ferlo region, Northern Senegal). ORSTOM, Thesis, University of Paris Sud, Paris, 166 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hiernaux, P. and Le Houérou, H.N. (2006) The Sahel Routes. Drought, 17, 51-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">White, F. (1986) The Vegetation of Africa. Memorandum Accompanying the UNESCO/ AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa. ORSTOM-UNESCO, translated by P. Bamps, Paris, 384 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bille, J.C. (1977) Study of the Net Primary Production of a Sahelian Ecosystem. In: Works and Documents, No. 65, ORSTOM, Paris, 81 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Houerou, H.N. (1989) The Grazing Land Ecosystems of the African Sahel. In: Ecological Studies, Vol. 75, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 282 p.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74457-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barry, J.P., Boudet, G., Bourgeot, A., Celles, J.C., Coulibaly, A.M., Leprun, J.C and Manière, R. (1983) Study of Pastoral Potential and Their Evolution in the Sahelian Environment in Mali. Ministry of Research and Industry, ACC/GRIZA Program, LAT, Paris, 114 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, B., Polcher, J., Karambiri, H. and Rockel, B. (2012) Characterization of the Rainy Season in Burkina Faso and It’s Representation by Regional Climate models. Climate Dynamics, 39, 1287-1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1276-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lodoun, T., Giannini, A., Traoré, P.S., Somé, L., Sanon, M., Vaksmann, M. and Rasolodimby, J.M. (2013) Changes in Seasonal Descriptors of Precipitation in Burkina Faso Associated with Late 20th Century Drought and Recovery in West Africa. Environmental Development, 5, 96-108.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.11.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarhule, A., Zume, J.T., Grijsen, J., Talbi-Jordan, A., Guero, A., Dessouassi, R.Y., Doffou, H., Kone, S., Coulibaly, B. and Harshadeep, N.R. (2015) Exploring Temporal Hydroclimatic Variability in the Niger Basin (1901-2006) Using Observed and Gridded Data. International Journal of Climatology, 35, 520-539.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3999</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Menaut, J.C. (1983) The Vegetation of African Savannas. In: Bourlière, F., Ed., édit Tropical Savannas, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 109-149.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pascal, J.P. (2003) Notions on the Structure and Dynamics of Tropical Rainforests. French Forestry Review, LV, 118-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rollet, B. (1974) The Architecture of Dense Humid Evergreen Lowland Forests. Tropical Forestry Technical Center, Nogent-sur-Marne, 298 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aronson, J., Floret, C., Le Floc’h, E., Ovalle, C. and Pontanier, R. (1995) Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Ecosystems in Arid and Semi-Arid Zones. Vocabulary and Concepts. In: L’homme peut-il refaire ce qu’il a défait? John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, 11-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130464-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fall, A. (2014) The Senegalese Ferlo: Geographical Approach to the Vulnerability of Sahelian Anthroposystems. Thesis, University of Paris 13, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, 379 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>