<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2024.151001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-130363</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Growth and Biomass Accumulation in Lettuce (&lt;i&gt;Lactuca sativa&lt;/i&gt;)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Channa</surname><given-names>B. Rajashekar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brenden</surname><given-names>Armstrong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The use of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nTiO
  <sub>2</sub>) is gaining interest in agriculture because of their impact on many aspects of plant growth. The present study examines the effects of nTiO
  <sub>2</sub> (5 nm and 10 nm) applied to seeds and the seedlings as a foliar application on various aspects of growth characteristics and biomass accumulation in lettuce (
  Lactuca sativa, cv. Grand Rapids). Application of 10 nm nTiO
  <sub>2</sub> to seeds through imbibition resulted in a significant reduction in shoot biomass accumulation while 5 nm nTiO
  <sub>2</sub> did not affect the biomass accumulation in lettuce. The application of 10 nm nTiO
  <sub>2</sub> reduced the fresh shoot biomass accumulation by about 18% compared to the control plants. Other growth characteristics such as shoot dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, plant height, and leaf area were not affected by the application of both 5 nm and 10 nm nTiO
  <sub>2</sub>. In addition, foliar application of these nanoparticles to the lettuce seedlings did not have a significant effect on most of the growth parameters examined, and the increasing concentration ranging from 5 nm/L to 400 mg/L did not produce a consistent response in lettuce. Thus, nTiO
  <sub>2</sub> application to lettuce seeds had a notable negative impact on shoot growth while foliar application did not have a significant effect on many plant growth characteristics. However, foliar applications produced some symptoms of toxicity to the foliage in the form of necrotic or chlorotic patches on the leaves, which were more pronounced with increasing concentrations of both 5 nm and 10 nm nTiO
  <sub>2</sub>. However, these symptoms were apparent at a concentration as low as 50 mg/L of nTiO
  <sub>2</sub>. Thus, foliar application of nTiO
  <sub>2</sub> may not have a significant impact on many of the growth characteristics in lettuce, but it can result in foliar toxicity.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Growth Characteristics</kwd><kwd> Lettuce</kwd><kwd> Nanoparticles</kwd><kwd> Titanium Dioxide</kwd><kwd> Toxicity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>There is an increasing interest in using titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nTiO<sub>2</sub>) in crop production to improve the overall growth of plants and enhance the yield potential of many cultivated crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref1">1</xref>] . Many studies show a positive impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> on various aspects of plant growth characteristics such as improved seed germination, photosynthetic efficiency, root growth, biomass accumulation, nutrient assimilation, plant resilience under stress, and the overall growth and performance of many crop plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Titanium dioxide is a naturally occurring mineral and is considered safe and hence extensively used in many industrial and household products such as paints, construction materials, cosmetics, medicine, and many food products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref6">6</xref>] . TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles show photocatalytic properties and produce reactive oxygen species in the presence of UV and even under visible light with some modification of pristine TiO<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref7">7</xref>] . The photocatalytic property of nTiO<sub>2</sub> and the resulting production of oxidative species has been harnessed extensively in the reclamation of soil, water, and air contaminated with pollutants, and as an antimicrobial agent to improve food safety and in the self-sterilization of surfaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Despite the increasing interest in the application of nTiO<sub>2</sub> in agriculture to improve plant growth and performance, its effects on many aspects of plant growth are not clearly understood because plant responses to nTiO<sub>2</sub> are complex and widely variable. Several plant factors can impact the effects of nTiO<sub>2</sub> depending on plant species, type of plant tissues, growing conditions, and plant-environment interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref13">13</xref>] . Several studies have shown a positive impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> on many aspects of plant growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref17">17</xref>] . However, some studies show either negative effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref20">20</xref>] or no effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref23">23</xref>] of nTiO<sub>2</sub> in many crop species. Thus, there is no clear understanding of the factors that may contribute to the differential responses to nTiO<sub>2</sub> in crop plants including lettuce.</p><p>In addition to plant factors, many nanoparticle characteristics can notably influence the impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> on plant growth. For example, particle size can significantly influence the absorption, translocation, and accumulation of nTiO<sub>2</sub> in various plant parts, which can affect the plant responses to nTiO<sub>2</sub>. Smaller molecules are typically taken up by the plants and translocated more readily than the larger ones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref24">24</xref>] . Studies on wheat by Larue et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref24">24</xref>] showed that plants may have a limiting threshold of nanoparticle size for absorption and the subsequent translocation of nTiO<sub>2</sub> to other parts of the plants. Similarly, the concentration of nTiO<sub>2</sub> also has a significant impact on plants' responses. Typically, lower concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> are known to produce a positive impact on many plant functions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] while on the other hand, higher concentrations have been shown to produce a negative impact on plant growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref25">25</xref>] . Furthermore, high concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> can also lead to the production of oxidative stress and toxicity in plants due to their photocatalytic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref28">28</xref>] . The negative impact of the photocatalytic activity of nTiO<sub>2</sub> and the resulting oxidative stress has been demonstrated in many plant species and soil microbiota [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref33">33</xref>] . However, there is very little known about the impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticle size and its concentration on the growth of lettuce plants.</p><p>Therefore, the focus of the present study was to examine the effect of various concentrations of two different sizes of nTiO<sub>2</sub>, applied to seeds and to seedlings as foliar sprays, on various growth characteristics and biomass accumulation in lettuce plants.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study consisted of two greenhouse trials to determine the impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles on the growth of lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa, cv. Grand Rapids) in Manhattan, KS during 2023. Lettuce seeds were obtained from Ferry-Morse Seed Co. (Fulton, KY, USA), and the TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles (anatase; 5 nm and 10 - 30 nm, referred to herein as 10 nm) were obtained from SkySpring Nanomaterials, Inc. (Houston, TX, USA) and were stored in the dark in desiccators until use. Treatments of nTiO<sub>2</sub> consisting of two nanoparticle sizes were applied either through seed imbibition or as foliar sprays to the seedlings.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Seed Imbibition</title><p>Aqueous suspensions of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (5 nm and 10 nm) were used for all the treatments. Lettuce seeds were imbibed with water (control) or nTiO<sub>2</sub> suspensions (250 mg/L) for up to 12 hours and placed on moist paper towels in Petri dishes for germination. The nTiO<sub>2</sub> suspensions were freshly prepared and thoroughly agitated before all the treatment applications. Following the germination (after 10 days of sowing), the seedlings were transplanted into a peat-based mix growing medium, BM6 (Berger, Quebec, Canada) contained in 15 cm plastic pots (1 seedling/pot) (HC Companies, Twinsburg, OH, USA). The plants were grown in a greenhouse maintained approximately at 20˚C with solar radiation as the light source. Plants were watered every other day and fertigated approximately once a week with 100 mL of solution/plant containing 250 ppm N (Jack’s Peat-Lite, NPK: 20-10-20, JR Peters, Inc., Allentown, PA, USA). Plants were harvested after 4-5 weeks of transplanting. The experiment was conducted on a completely randomized design with 6 replications for each nanoparticle size.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Foliar Spray Treatments</title><p>In the first greenhouse study, the lettuce seeds were imbibed in water for up to 12 hours and directly sown in the moist peat-based growing medium (BM6) on July 17, 2023. After germination, the seedlings were thinned to retain one plant/ pot. Seedlings were watered every other day and fertigated once a week as described above. The 20-day-old lettuce seedlings were sprayed with freshly prepared nTiO<sub>2</sub> suspensions (5 nm and 10 nm) at 5, 10, 50, 100, 150, mg/L. Each plant was evenly sprayed with water (control) or nTiO<sub>2</sub> suspension ensuring its uniform coverage of the canopy and avoiding nTiO<sub>2</sub> contamination of the growing medium. The plants were irrigated before the foliar applications of nTiO<sub>2</sub> suspensions. The 5-week-old plants were harvested to measure their growth characteristics. The experiment was conducted on a completely randomized design with 6 replications.</p><p>A second greenhouse study was conducted to assess the impact of higher concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> on the growth of lettuce plants. Lettuce seeds were imbibed in water for 12 hours and were germinated and then, transplanted into the peat-based growing medium as described above. After thirteen days of transplanting, seedlings were treated with a foliar spray of freshly prepared nTiO<sub>2</sub> (5 nm and 10 nm) suspensions at 500 mg/L, 2500 mg/L, and 4000 mg/L as described above. With the high concentration of TiO<sub>2</sub>, agglomeration can be a problem, so, care was taken to apply well-dispersed nTiO<sub>2</sub> evenly over the foliage. The control plants were sprayed with water. Plants were irrigated every other day and fertigated once a week as described above. Plants were irrigated before the foliar applications of nTiO<sub>2</sub> suspensions. The experiment was conducted on a completely randomized design with 6 replications for each nanoparticle size.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Plant Growth Measurements</title><p>All plant growth measurements were made on the plants grown from seeds imbibed with nTiO<sub>2</sub> and on those treated with nTiO<sub>2</sub> through foliar sprays before harvest.</p><p>As the lettuce variety has a loose-leaf canopy, plant height was measured from the base of the stem to the tallest leaf. The other growth characteristics measured were the number of fully opened leaves/plant and the leaf area of all the fully opened leaves using a leaf area meter (LI-3100, LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE). To measure the plant biomass, plant shoots were separated from roots. The roots were washed free of the growing medium and were blotted dry with paper towels to remove the surface moisture. Shoot and root fresh weights from each plant were measured. They were then transferred to a drying oven at 70˚C and were dried for 4 days or until a constant weight was achieved before measuring the dry weights.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analyses</title><p>All the experiments were conducted on a completely randomized design with 6 replications with nTiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticle sizes and their various concentrations as treatment variables. The Tukey HSD test was conducted at alpha 0.05 and p-values were obtained to perform multiple comparisons of the treatment means.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Seed Imbibition and Plant Growth</title><p>The response of lettuce plants grown from seeds treated with 5 nm and 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> in relation to various plant growth characteristics including shoot fresh and dry biomass, root fresh and dry biomass, plant height, leaf area, and leaf number was studied at the time of harvest.</p><p>Lettuce plants grown from the seeds imbibed with nTiO<sub>2</sub> at 250 mg/L produced variable responses. The fresh shoot biomass of lettuce plants was significantly reduced by the seed treatment with 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> by 18.1% compared to the control while, on the contrary, there was no significant impact on the fresh shoot biomass in plants receiving seed treatment with 5 nm nanoparticles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). This was partly due to a significant reduction in the number of leaves/ plant with 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> seed treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). This shows that larger nanoparticle size had a significant negative impact on shoot biomass in lettuce compared to the smaller particle size. However, it should be noted that the size of nanoparticles can impact not only their absorption but more importantly their translocation leading to their differential accumulation in various plant parts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Many growth characteristics including plant height, dry shoot biomass, leaf area, and both fresh and dry root biomass were not affected by the seed treatment of either 5 nm or 10 nm nanoparticles (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). Also, there was no significant impact on the seed germination in response to the different nanoparticle sizes (data not shown). Similar results were observed in kidney beans where nTiO<sub>2</sub> did not affect the germination but had a significant impact on early root growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Although most of the growth characteristics were unaffected by nTiO<sub>2</sub> treatment, it is noteworthy that the negative impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (10 nm) on fresh shoot biomass has practical implications for the growers as it can notably affect the marketable yield. The reduction of shoot growth (biomass accumulation) when</p><p>nTiO<sub>2</sub> was applied to seeds may indicate its negative impact on the early growth of lettuce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] . Similar observations on the negative effects of seed treatment of nTiO<sub>2</sub> have been made in other species including corn, cucumber, oats, onion, and tomato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref34">34</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Foliar Spray and Plant Growth</title><p>In the first greenhouse study, lettuce seedlings were treated with both 5 nm and 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles at concentrations ranging from 5 mg/L to 150 mg/L as a foliar spray.</p><p>Foliar spray of 5 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> did not have any significant impact on many of the growth characteristics of lettuce except the number of leaves per plant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Plants treated with 10 mg/L and 150 mg/L of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (5 nm) produced more leaves/plant compared to the control plants, the highest leaf number/plant being at 150 mg/L of nTiO<sub>2</sub>. The responses to other nTiO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were not</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Growth characteristics of lettuce plants grown from seeds treated with nTiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles of different sizes. Lettuce seeds were imbibed with nTiO<sub>2</sub> (5 nm and 10 nm; 250 mg/L) or water (control) for up to 12 hours and the growth measurements of plants were made at the time of harvest. The mean values with their SD and p-values are presented</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot DW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root FW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root DW* (g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8 &#177; 5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 &#177; 1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >nTiO<sub>2</sub>, 5 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3 &#177; 2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.3 &#177; 8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >nTiO<sub>2</sub>, 10 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.3 &#177; 3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 &#177; 3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.953</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.925</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*FW and DW represent the fresh weight and dry weight, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of foliar spray of lettuce plants with nTiO<sub>2</sub> (5 nm) on growth characteristics of lettuce plants. Lettuce plants were sprayed with nTiO <sub>2</sub> (5 nm) or water (control). The growth measurements were made at the time of harvest. The mean values with their SD and p-values are presented</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >nTiO<sub>2</sub> 5 nm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot FW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot DW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf number/ plant</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.6 &#177; 12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >636 &#177; 158.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >674 &#177; 191.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.8 &#177; 12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#177; 1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2 &#177; 3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8 &#177; 2.3*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >812 &#177; 131.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.2 &#177; 9.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2 &#177; 4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >606 &#177; 89.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.0 &#177; 5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2 &#177; 3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >601 &#177; 97.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.8 &#177; 9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0 &#177; 4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8 &#177; 2.4*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >796 &#177; 109.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*FW and DW represent the fresh weight and dry weight, respectively.</p><p>different from those in the control plants. Unlike the seed treatment of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (10 nm), the foliar sprays did not result in the reduction of shoot fresh biomass compared to the control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Although there was an increase in shoot dry biomass in response to nTiO<sub>2</sub> (10 nm) at 10 mg/L, both shoot fresh and dry biomass accumulations at higher concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> were similar to the those in the control.</p><p>Similarly, nTiO<sub>2</sub> concentrations did not have an impact on the leaf area compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Overall, these observations suggest that the foliar application of nTiO<sub>2</sub> up to 150 mg/L did not significantly impact most of the growth characteristics in lettuce plants. Therefore in a separate study, we used higher concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> as a foliar spray, to determine their impact on the growth of lettuce plants. Foliar sprays of both 5 nm and 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> at concentrations ranging from 500 mg/L to 4000 mg/L were applied to the lettuce seedlings. Again, these treatments produced variable results on the shoot and root biomass with regard to the nanoparticle concentrations. The notable response of lettuce at higher concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> was the reduction in fresh shoot biomass with 5 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> and in dry shoot biomass with 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>Fresh shoot biomass was reduced by approximately 20% compared to that in the control plants with the application of 5 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> at 500 mg/L. However, 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> at 500 mg/L reduced the shoot dry biomass by about 29% compared to that in the control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>However, these responses were variable at higher concentrations. Foliar applications of 5 nm or 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> did not have any impact on other growth characteristics such as plant height, leaf area, root fresh and dry biomass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Our results support the previous studies that show no impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> on many aspects of plant growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] . Furthermore, previous studies have also shown that nTiO<sub>2</sub> can have a negative impact on plant growth and even be toxic, especially at higher concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref17">17</xref>] . Hu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref25">25</xref>] showed that</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of foliar spray of lettuce plants with 5 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> on growth characteristics of lettuce plants. Lettuce seedlings were sprayed with nTiO<sub>2</sub> (5 nm) or water (control). The growth measurements were made at the time of harvest. The mean values with their SD and p-values are presented</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >nTiO<sub>2</sub> 5 nm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot DW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf number/ plant</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root FW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root DW* (g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8 &#177; 5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 &#177; 1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3 &#177; 2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.8 &#177; 12.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4 &#177; 2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4000 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8 &#177; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7 &#177; 4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2 &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.511</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.560</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*FW and DW represent the fresh weight and dry weight, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of foliar spray of lettuce plants with 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> on growth characteristics of lettuce plants. Lettuce seedlings were sprayed with nTiO<sub>2</sub> (10 nm) or water (control). The growth measurements were made at the time of harvest. The mean values with their SD and p-values are presented</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >nTiO<sub>2</sub> 10 nm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot FW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root FW* (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root DW* (g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.8 &#177; 5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1403.8 &#177; 139.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8 &#177; 5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 &#177; 1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.0 &#177; 5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.2 &#177; 4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1310.7 &#177; 149.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.6 &#177; 11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3 &#177; 1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.9 &#177; 8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.3 &#177; 2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1290.3 &#177; 254.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.6 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1 &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4000 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.6 &#177; 8.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.7 &#177; 3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1374.5 &#177; 258.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32. 3 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.419</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*FW and DW represent the fresh weight and dry weight, respectively.</p><p>the effects of nTiO<sub>2</sub> were dose-dependent in lettuce plants in that its higher concentrations suppressed chlorophyll content, biomass, and the nutritional quality of lettuce.</p><p>Considering the observation that the negative impact of plant growth (biomass accumulation) by nTiO<sub>2</sub> when it was applied to the seeds while foliar sprays produced little or no impact on overall growth may suggest that early stages of seedling growth including the germination process are more sensitive to nTiO<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] . This is further supported by previous studies that find early growth in many plants including corn, oats, cabbage, and oilseed rape is sensitive to nTiO<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Furthermore, foliar applications of nTiO<sub>2</sub> to lettuce seedlings, regardless of their size, showed some signs of toxicity. The foliar applications resulted in many brown necrotic spots or etiolated blotches on the leaves, which were more pronounced at higher concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). However, these symptoms were apparent with the foliar application of nTiO<sub>2</sub> even at concentrations as low as 50 mg/L. It is noteworthy that although the growth responses were variable with foliar application of nTiO<sub>2</sub>, the higher concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> produced signs of toxicity in lettuce. These observations support many previous studies involving the applications of high concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> that result in injury caused by oxidative stress in several plant species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref35">35</xref>] . As nTiO<sub>2</sub> is a photocatalytic substance, it can generate reactive oxygen species in the presence of light, especially UV, which can be highly damaging to cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref23">23</xref>] . The primary effect of oxidative species induced by nTiO<sub>2</sub> is the damage to the chloroplast membranes resulting not only in reduced photosynthetic function but also in promoting autophagy, a process through which impaired cell organelles could be eliminated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>Similar findings of the negative impact of nTiO<sub>2</sub> on photosynthetic function and the overall growth in many plant species including lettuce have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130363-ref32">32</xref>] . Our results on lettuce show that the application of both 5 nm and 10 nm nTiO<sub>2</sub> as a foliar spray can cause toxicity to the leaves in lettuce even at moderate concentrations of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (50 mg/L or higher).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The impact of two nanoparticle sizes of nTiO<sub>2</sub> applied through seed imbibition and as a foliar spray at various concentrations (5 mg/L to 4000 mg/L) on the</p><p>growth characteristics of lettuce was studied in a greenhouse trial. Seed imbibition of nTiO<sub>2</sub> (10 nm) significantly reduced shoot biomass accumulation in lettuce plants. However, the other growth characteristics including dry shoot biomass and both fresh and dry root biomass were not affected by nTiO<sub>2</sub> treatments. The foliar applications of nTiO<sub>2</sub> showed variable responses with regard to many of the growth parameters studied. Considering the observation that there was a significant negative impact on shoot growth with seed treatment but with no significant effects on many growth characteristics with foliar applications, early growth in lettuce appears to be more sensitive to nTiO<sub>2</sub> than the later stages of plant growth. However, foliar spray, especially at higher concentrations (≥50 mg/L), showed signs of toxicity as evidenced by localized leaf necrotic and etiolated patches. Thus, the results show that lettuce plants are more sensitive to nTiO<sub>2</sub> when applied to seeds, suppressing shoot growth, while the foliar applications had no significant effect on many of the growth characteristics but can produce foliar toxicity.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rajashekar, C.B. and Armstrong, B. (2024) Effect of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Growth and Biomass Accumulation in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 15, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2024.151001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130363-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lyu, S., Wei, X., Chen, J., Wang, C., Wang, X. and Pan, D. (2017) Titanium as a Beneficial Element for Crop Production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, Article No. 597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00597</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, F., Hong, F., You, W., Liu, C., Gao, F., Wu, C. and Yang, P. (2006) Influences of Nano-Anatase TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; on the Nitrogen Metabolism of Growing Spinach. Biological Trace Element Research, 110, 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1385/BTER:110:2:179</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daghan, H., Gulmezoglu, N., Koleli, N. and Karakaya, B. (2020) Impact of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles (TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt;-NPs) on Growth and Mineral Nutrient Uptake of Wheat (Triticum vulgare L.). Biotech Studies, 29, 69-76.  
https://doi.org/10.38042/biost.2020.29.02.03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choi, H.G. (2021) Influence of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Foliar Spray Application on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Strawberry during Low Light Intensity. Acta Horticulturae, 1309, 247-252. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1309.36</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vatankhah, A., Aliniaeifard, S., Moosavi-Nezhad, M., Abdi, S., Mokhtarpour, Z., Reezi, S., Tsaniklidis, G. and Fanourakis, D. (2023) Plants Exposed to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Acquired Contrasting Photosynthetic and Morphological Strategies Depending on the Growing Light Intensity: A Case Study in Radish. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 5873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32466-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohajerani, M., Burnett, L., Smith, J.V., Kurmus, H., Milas, J., Arulrajah, A., Horpibulsuk, S. and Kadir, A.A. (2019) Nanoparticles in Construction Materials and Other Applications, and Implications of Nanoparticle Use. Materials, 12, Article No. 3052.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etacheri, V., Valentin, C., Schneider, J., Bahnemann, D. and Pillai, S.C. (2015) Visible-Light Activation of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Photocatalysts: Advances in Theory and Experiments. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Phytochemistry Reviews, 25, 1-29.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, T.C., Lu, N., Li, J. and Wu, Y. (2011) Plasma-TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Catalytic Method for High-Efficiency Remediation of p-Nitrophenol Contaminated Soil in Pulsed Discharge. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 9301-9307.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/es2014314</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Long, M., Wang, J., Zhuang, H., Zhang, Y. and Wu, H. (2014) Performance and Mechanism of Standard Nano-TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; (P-25) in Photocatalytic Disinfection of Foodborne Microorganisms—Salmonella typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control, 39, 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kühn, K., Chaberny, I.F., Massholder, K., Stickler, M., Benz, V.W., Sonntag, H. and Erdinger, L. (2003) Disinfection of Surfaces by Photocatalytic Oxidation with Titanium Dioxide and UVA Light. Chemosphere, 53, 71-77.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00362-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhan, C., Li, Y., Sharma, P.R., He, H., Sharma, S.K., Wang, R. and Hsiao, B.S. (2019) A Study of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanocrystal Growth and Environmental Remediation Capability of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt;/CNC Nanocomposites. RSC Advances, 9, 40565-40576.  
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08861J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, F., Shen, Y., Ma, C., Zhang, X., Cao, W. and Rul, Y. (2017) Effects of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Cultivated under Super-Elevated and Normal CO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Conditions. PLOS ONE, 12, e0178088.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gohari, G., Mohammadi, A., Akbari, A., Panahirad, S., Dadpour, M.R., Fotopoulos, V. and Kimura, S. (2020) Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles (TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; NPS) Promote Growth and Ameliorate Salinity Stress Effects on Essential Oil Profile and Biochemical Attributes of Dracocephalum moldavica. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 912. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57794-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, U., Shin, M., Lee, G., Roh, J., Kim, Y. and Lee, E.J. (2013) Functional Analysis of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticle Toxicity in Three Plant Species. Biological Trace Element Research, 155, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-013-9765-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andersen, C.P., King, G., Plocher, M., Storm, M., Pokhrel, L.R., Johnson, M.B. and Rygiewicz, P.T. (2016) Germination and Early Plant Development of Ten Plant Species Exposed to Titanium Dioxide and Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles. Environmental Technology and Chemistry, 35, 2223-2229. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3374</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Debnath, K., Das, A., Das, B. and Karfoma, J. (2020) TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles Enhancing Germination, Growth and Yield of Rice. International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 21, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.9734/irjpac/2020/v21i630173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sebesta, M., Kolencik, M., Sunil, B.R., Illa, R., Mosnacek, J., Ingle, A. and Urik, M. (2021) Field Application of ZnO and TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles on Agricultural Plants. Agronomy, 11, Article No. 2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asli, S. and Neuman, P.M. (2009) Colloidal Suspensions of Clay or Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Can Inhibit Leaf Growth and Transpiration via Physical Effects on Root Water Transport. Plant, Cell and Environment, 32, 577-584.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01952.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruffini Castiglione, M., Giorgetti, L., Ger., C. and Cremonini, R. (2010) The Effects of Nano-TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; on Seed Germination, Development and Mitosis of Root Tip Cells of Vicia narbonensis and Zea mays L. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13, 2443-2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0135-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Du, W., Sun, Y., Ji, R., Wu, J. and Gao, H. (2011) TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; and ZnO Nanoparticles Negatively Affect Wheat Growth and Soil Enzyme Activities in Agricultural Soil. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13, 822-828.  
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00611d</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larue, C., Khodja, H., Herlin-Biome, N., Brisset, F., Flank, A., Fayard, B., Chillou, S. and Carriere, M. (2011) Investigation of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Toxicity and Uptake by Plants. Journal of Physics, 304, Article ID: 012057.  
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012057</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Korenkova, L., Sebesta, M., Urik, M., Kolencik, M., Kratosova, G., Bujdos, M., Vavra, I. and Dobrocka, E. (2017) Physiological Response of Culture Media-Grown barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, Section B—Soli and Plant Science, 67, 285-291.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2016.1267255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J., Naeem, M.S., Wang, X., Liu, L., Chen, C., Ma, N. and Zang, C. (2015) Nano-TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Is Not Phytotoxic as Revealed by the Oilseed Rape Growth and Photosynthetic Apparatus Ultrastructural Response. PLOS ONE, 10, e0143885.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143885</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larue, C., Layurette, J., Herlin-Biome, N., Khodja, H., Fayard, B., Flank, A., Brisset, F. and Carriere, M. (2012) Accumulation, Translocation and Impact of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Naoparticles in Wheat (Tritcum aestivum ssp.): Influence of Diameter and Crystal phase. Science of the Total Environment, 431, 197-208.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, J., Wu, X., Wu, F., Chen, W., Zhang, X., White, J.C., Li, J., Wan, Y., Liu, J. and Wang, X. (2020) TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticle Exposure on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.): Dose-Dependent Deterioration of Nutritional Quality. Environmental Science Nano, 7, 501. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EN01215J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mattiello, A., Filippi, A., Poscic, F., Musetti, R., Savatici, M.C., Giordano, S., Vischi, M., Bertolini, A. and Marchiol, L. (2015) Evidence of Phytotoxicity and Genotoxicity in Hordeum vulgare L. exposed to CeO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; and TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, Article No. 1043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dogaroglu, Z.G. and Koleli, N. (2017) TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; and ZnO Nanoparticles Toxicity in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Clean-Soil Air Water, 45, Article ID: 1700096.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201700096</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jurkow, R., Kalisz, A., Huska, D., Sekara, A. and Dastborhan, S. (2021) Sequential Changes in Antioxidant Potential of Oakleaf Lettuce Seedlings Caused by Nano-TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Treatment. Nanomaterials, 11, Article No. 1171.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051171</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, L., Hong, F., Lu, S. and Liu, C. (2005) Effect of Nano-TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; on Strength of Naturally Aged Seeds and Growth of Spinach. Biological Trace Element Research, 104, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1385/BTER:104:1:083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, D. and Xing, B. (2007) Phytotoxicity of Nanoparticles: Inhibition of Seed Germination and Root Growth. Environmental Pollution, 150, 243-250.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Wu, N., Mao, H., Zhou, J., Su, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H. and Yuan, S. (2019) Different Toxicities on Nanoscale Titanium Dioxide Particles in the Roots and Leaves of Wheat Seedlings. RSC Advances, 9, 19243-19252.  
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/ra/c9ra02984b 
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA02984B</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wani, S., Irum, S., Gul, I., Yaqoob, K., Khalid, U., Ali, M., Manzoor, U., Noor, T., Ali, S., Rizwan, M. and Arshad, M. (2021) TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles Dose, Application Method and Phosphorous Levels Influence Genotoxicity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Soil Enzymatic Activities and Plant Growth. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 213, Article ID: 111977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111977</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima, A., Carvalho, A., Pinheiro, S., Torres, Y., Miguel, T., Pireda, S., Fechine, P., Fergolente, L. and Miguel, E. (2023) Effect of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Microparticles in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Seeds and Seedlings. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 110, Article No. 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-023-03752-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, U., Jun, H., Waldman, B., Roh, J., Kim, Y., Yi, J. and Lee, E. (2013) Functional Analyses of Nanoparticle Toxicity: A Comparative Study of the Effects of TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; and Ag on Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 93, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.03.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, G., Gao, Y., Wu, H., Hou, W., Zhang, C. and Ma. (2012) Physiological Effect of Anatase TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles on Lemna minor. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 31, 2147-2152. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1933</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130363-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shull, T.E., Kurepa, J. and Smalle, J.A. (2019) Anatase TiO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; Nanoparticles Induce Autophagy and Chloroplast Degradation in Thale Cress (Arabidopsis thaliana). Environmental Science and Technology, 53, 9522-9532.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01648</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>