<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2023.1412079</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-130102</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Acute Peritonitis at the Reference Health Center of Commune I of the District of Bamako: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tounkara</surname><given-names>Cheickna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samake</surname><given-names>Hamidou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maïga</surname><given-names>Amadou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cisse</surname><given-names>Alou Hamadoun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diarra</surname><given-names>Issaka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanogo</surname><given-names>Modibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Togola</surname><given-names>Modibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dembele</surname><given-names>Bakary Tientigui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Traore</surname><given-names>Alhassane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Togo</surname><given-names>Pierre Adegne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kante</surname><given-names>Lassana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery, Cs Ref of Commune I of Bamako, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery, Gabriel Toure University Hospital, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Central Directorate of Social Service of Army Health, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>728</fpage><lpage>737</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Acute peritonitis is most often secondary to perforation of the digestive organ and/or the spread of an intra-abdominal septic focus. The objectives of this work were to study acute peritonitis in the general surgery department of the Cs ref of commune I in Mali, to determine the frequency of peritonitis, to describe the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects in order to analyze the surgical consequences
   
  and to assess the additional cost of treating acute peritonitis. This study was prospective, descriptive, cross-sectional involving 40 patients received in the surgery department of the Cs ref of commune I for acute peritonitis from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. There were 40 patients among whom 28 (70%) were men and 12 
  were 
  women (30%), i.e. a sex ratio = 2.3. The average age was 25 years with extremes varying between 16 and 54 years and a standard deviation of 11.78. Abdominal pain was the main reason for consultation. Clinical examination alone made it possible to make the diagnosis in 75% of cases. Surgical treatment depended on the intraoperative etiology. The clinical diagnosis was supported by ASP and abdominal ultrasound; performed respectively in 10% and 90% of patients. Appendiceal peritonitis was the intraoperative diagnosis observed in 50% of cases. All our patients benefited from a peritoneal toilet with drainage. We noted a morbidity rate of 5% dominated by parietal suppuration. The average cost of care was 175,000 FCFA.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Acute Peritonitis</kwd><kwd> Epidemiology</kwd><kwd> Diagnostic</kwd><kwd> Therapy</kwd><kwd> Surgical Emergencies</kwd><kwd> Cs Ref CI</kwd><kwd> Bamako</kwd><kwd> Mali</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Acute generalized peritonitis is an acute inflammation of the peritoneum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref1">1</xref>] . It is a common surgical pathology resulting in a therapeutic emergency and occupies 3rd place in digestive surgery emergencies in Africa after acute appendicitis and occlusions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>In the USA: 17% of appendectomies were complicated by peritonitis with a mortality of 0.4% and morbidity of 0.3% to 5.1% in 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In France: Peritonitis due to STIs, 80% by Neisseria gonorrhea in 2008 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>In Germany: 58% of deaths in 36 patients with severe peritonitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>In Asia: The prognosis was 70% to 80% death in the event of multi-organ failure at the time of the intervention in 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>In Africa: The frequency varied from 28.1% in Congo to 49% in Niger with a mortality of 20.98% and morbidity of 49% in 2005 and 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In Burkina Faso: The late arrival of patients at the hospital coupled with a long and complex procedure contributed to an increase in mortality in 1999 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>In Tunisia: Risk factors (age over 65 years; associated defects; signs of shock) must benefit from a simple and rapid surgical procedure to avoid an additional risk of post-operative complications in 2000.</p><p>In Morocco: In 2005 the prognosis can be improved by urgent and multidisciplinary care combining early diagnosis, emergency exploratory laparotomy and well-adapted early resuscitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>In Mali: The frequency of acute peritonitis was 7.4% in 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref12">12</xref>] . The diagnosis of acute peritonitis is essentially clinical; radiological examinations and imaging can help with the diagnosis. Laparoscopy plays an important role in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of peritonitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref3">3</xref>] . The prognosis depends on age, etiology, time to diagnosis, early treatment and long duration of interventions.</p><p>Management is multidisciplinary early and well adapted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Given the high number of this pathology in the health center and the lack of evaluation of the frequency over a period of one year, we decided to do this work to contribute to improving care. To properly conduct this study, we set ourselves objectives.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Research Methodology</title><p>This prospective cross-sectional study runs from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 in the general surgery department of the Reference Health Center of Commune I of Bamako. We collected 40 cases of acute peritonitis.</p><p>- Inclusion criteria:</p><p>Any patient who had surgery for acute peritonitis and was treated in the general surgery department of the Cs Ref of commune I during the study period.</p><p>- Non-inclusion criteria:</p><p>All patients received for peritonitis and not operated on; all patients operated on elsewhere or for other causes in the surgery department of Cs Ref C I of the Bamako district.</p><p>The variables studied were sociodemographic (age, sex, profession, residence); physical examination (general, functional, physical signs); additional examinations (ultrasound, abdominal x-ray without preparation); emergency biological assessment (Hemoglobin level, Hematocrit, Rhesus group, Prothrombin level, Cephalin Kaolin time, Blood sugar) and surgical treatment: technique and short and medium term operative consequences.</p><p>The media used were the patients’ medical files, the outpatient consultation and hospitalization registers, recording the patients’ reports, the individual investigation sheet and the anesthesia protocol.</p><p>The data were analyzed and entered with SPSS software version 25. Word processing was done with Word software version 2016 and ENDNOTEX software. 9 was used for the management of bibliographic references. The comparison of the texts was made by the Chi square statistical test with P &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>We carried out 1420 consultations; 485 hospitalizations; 180 patients admitted urgently; 386 surgical interventions including 40 cases of acute peritonitis or 2.82% of consultations; 8.25% of hospitalizations; 22.22% of emergencies and 10.36% of interventions carried out in the general surgery department of the Cs ref of commune I of Bamako in Mali. The average age was 25 years (age range 16 to 25 years = 65%) with the extremes of 16 and 54 years and a standard deviation of 11.78. The sex ratio was 2.3 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). More than half of our patients (77.5%) were seen urgently (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The average duration of disease progression before admission was 2 days, or 72.5% of cases. Abdominal pain was the reason for consultation in 97.5% of cases and was involved in IDF in 47.5% of cases. This abdominal pain was of gradual onset (77.5%), stinging type (57.5%), intense (37.5%) and without irradiation (40%). Fever associated with vomiting were the most frequent accompanying signs (52.5%), vomiting (87.5%) and cessation of materials and gases (5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The physical signs were dominated by abdominal contracture (92.5%), defensiveness (75%), navel cry (87.5%), bulging Douglas fir (87.5%) and abdominal silence (95%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Abdomen without preparation was performed in 10% of patients and ultrasound in 90% of patients whose result was in favor of acute peritonitis (44%), moderate effusion (30%), liver abscess. ruptured (8%) and appendiceal peritonitis (6%). Appendiceal peritonitis (50%) constituted half of the diagnosis found intraoperatively (Tables 6-8).</p><p>Medical treatment was based on analgesics (Perfalgan and/or Acupan</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sociodemographic data</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 years to 25 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 years to 35 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 years to 45 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 years and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feminine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trader</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breeder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Artisan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pupil/Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Origin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bamako</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outside of Bamako</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to mode of admission and level of education</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Admission method and level of education</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Admission method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Referred</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Educational level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Superior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Koranic school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uneducated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>parenterally), antibiotics (ceftriaxone 80 to 100 mg/kg/day in two doses, metronidazole infusion 30 mg/kg/day &#215; 2 and gentamicin 3 to 5 mg/kg/day &#215; 2) and rehydration in all our regular patients. The transfusion was done in 5 of our patients or 12.5% of cases. The midline above and below the umbilical route was the surgical approach used (77.5%) and the extended Mc Burney (22.5%). The surgical technique used was appendectomy with burial (62.5%), end-to-end anastomosis resection of the small intestine (2.5%) and excision-suture of perforations (12.5%). The peritoneal fluid collected was frank pus in 77.5% of cases</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to reason for consultation and accompanying signs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reason for consultation/Accompanying signs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Reason for consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fever</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal meteorism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Accompanying signs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vomiting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34/40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fever</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35/40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nausea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28/40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Constipation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recectorgia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold sweat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13/40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to pain characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pain characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Type of pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Burn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Twist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crushing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mode of onset of pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progressive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brutal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Evolution of pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Permed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermittent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Pain irradiation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Posterior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascendant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FID</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Umbilical peri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epigastric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generalized</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without irradiation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Duration of pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 to 2 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to accompanying signs and triggering factor</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Associated signs and triggering factor</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Associated signs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vomiting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fever</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nausea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Constipation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recectorgia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold sweat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Triggering factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hunger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to physical signs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Physical signs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generalized contracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pain on palpation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Decreased abdominal breathing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal silence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal meteorism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal dullness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Localized Defense</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tympanism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cry of the navel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Painful rectal exam with bulging Douglas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Painful vaginal touch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal mass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foul leucorrhoea on TV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.50</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to paraclinical diagnosis, bacteriology result and ASA classification</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dg. Paraclinical/Bacteriology/ASA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ultrasound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not done</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Done</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Abdomen without ASP preparation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydro-aerial levels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diffuse grayness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Bacteriology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Presence of germs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No germs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >ASA I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >ASA II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Treatment and early operative outcomes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatment and early post-operative outcomes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Approaches first</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median above and below umbilical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median subumbilical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Operating technique</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Appendectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ileostomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suturing the perforation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >End-to-end anastomosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Aftermath of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parietal suppuration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>with the presence of germs in 26% of cases. The Mannheim score was less than 26 in all our patients. The outcome was simple in 95% of our patients and the morbidity rate (infection of the surgical site) was 5%.</p><p>The average cost of care was 175,000 FCFA.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>We carried out a prospective descriptive cross-sectional study from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 which included 40 patients operated on for acute peritonitis. Patients were identified from consultation, operative report, anesthesia, hospitalization registers and the individual survey form. Acute peritonitis (22.22%) in surgical emergencies constituted the 2nd cause of emergencies in general surgery compared to 60% of acute appendicitis. This frequency is comparable to that of Dissa B.A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] , (21.14%) in Mali and Harouna Y.D. in Niger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] , (28.8%); significantly higher than that of Lorand I. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref1">1</xref>] , (3%). This difference could be linked to the high frequency of infectious diseases on the one hand and on the other hand to a delay in consultation, diagnosis and upstream management of the main conditions in question. Our average age (25 years) is comparable to that of Ouengr&#233; E. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref15">15</xref>] , (24.34 years with P = 0.939010, Chi<sup>2</sup> = 0.01) in Burkina Faso and Dissa B.A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] , (24 years with P = 0.900799) in Mali but statistically different from that of Gougard P. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref16">16</xref>] , (48 years with P = 0.005349) in France and Mall&#233; O.A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] , (32 years with P = 0.616524). Studies have reported a higher frequency in men than in women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Our sex ratio was 2.3 in favor of men; gender is not a risk factor. The frequency of functional signs differed according to the authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref19">19</xref>] ; linked to etiologies, delay in consultation and the stage of progression of the disease. Abdominal pain (97.5% of our patients) remains the dominant functional sign according to several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] ; other characteristics of pain have value in diagnostic guidance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref11">11</xref>] . Vomiting (2/3 of patients, i.e. 87.5%), food, bilious or fecal, was statistically comparable to that of Dissa B.A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] in Mali with a rate of 78% P = 0.198076 but significantly lower than that of Mall&#233; O.A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] , 53% P = 0.0190076 in Mali; Rahman G.A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] , 60% P = 0.001066 in Niger. This vomiting reflects the expression of a paralytic ileus, responsible for dehydration and hydro-electrolyte disorders. The cessation of materials and gases indicates early or late frank intestinal paralysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref12">12</xref>] . The 5% of our series are different from the 40% of Dissa B.A. (P = 0.000044) in Mali. The general signs correlated with the severity of peritoneal contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref9">9</xref>] , fever (50% of patients), corroborate with the data in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] . On physical examination, abdominal contracture (92.5%) is the major sign; localized or generalized defense, the semiological meaning is the same [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] . This rate does not differ from those in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>In the ASP, the pneumoperitoneum in the form of a gaseous interhepatodiaphragmatic crescent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] ; this crescent was observed in 5% of our patients. It varies between 8% and 71% in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref19">19</xref>] , linked to the etiology; the absence does not eliminate digestive perforation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref18">18</xref>] . Hydro-aerial levels were found in 5% of our patients, statistically different from the 47.5% (P = 0.000001 Chi<sup>2</sup> = 24.30) of Harouna Y.D. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] in Niger in 2001 but comparable to 7.5% of Mall&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] in Mali in 2015. The harmless abdominal ultrasound was performed in 36 patients or 90% of cases, of which 33% of cases were appendicular. This result is comparable to 35.29% of Mall&#233; O.A. in Mali in 2015 with P = 0.813089, Chi<sup>2</sup> = 0.01; significantly lower than that of Dissa B.A. in Mali (70.45%, P = 0.000045, Chi<sup>2</sup> = 16.65).</p><p>In Europe, the main etiologies of acute peritonitis represented by digestive perforations (appendicitis, UGD, intestinal diverticulosis, cholelithiasis, abdominal trauma and digestive tumors) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref19">19</xref>] , are noted in African series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] except for rare intestinal diverticulosis in Africans. Typhoid fever and its digestive complications are common in Africa; rare in Europe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref16">16</xref>] . Appendiceal peritonitis was our first etiology (50%), as was the case with Mall&#233; O.A [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] , 52.5% with P = 0.070400 and Pomata M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref20">20</xref>] in Italy, but third cause with Kambir&#233; J.L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref18">18</xref>] . 19% with P = 0.44036 in 2017 in Burkina Faso. Perforation of peptic ulcer, second cause in our study (12.5%) corroborates with that of Mall&#233; O.A. (12.5%) in 2015.</p><p>Resuscitation aimed to correct the hydro-electrolyte and hemodynamic disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] . This resuscitation was brief in our series (2 to 3 hours) and simple (essentially filling with solutes). Antibiotic therapy composed of a combination of beta-lactams and imidazoles, possibly supplemented by an aminoglycoside, corresponded to the scheme of Le Treut Y.R. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref19">19</xref>] . We used triple antibiotic therapy based on (Ceftriaxone 1 g + Metronidazole 500 mg + Gentamicin 80 mg) subsequently modified and adapted according to the antibiogram. These associations have been used by other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The surgical approach was median incisions above and below the umbilical and xipho-pubic straddling the umbilicus justified by the need for washing and drainage by certain authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] , as in our series. The morbidity rate (5%) in our series is comparable to the 13.5% of MALLE A. O. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] in Mali and significantly lower than the data from Niger and Tunisia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref10">10</xref>] . This could be linked to the size of the sample and the developmental stage of the patients. Mortality was zero in our study. This mortality varies between 11.11% to 15.70% in African series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.130102-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Acute generalized peritonitis constitutes a frequent surgical emergency. An improvement in the technical platform, sufficient health coverage and health education could reduce the frequency of hospitalization. They affect young people; 20 patients out of the 40 cases of peritonitis were young people.</p><p>The etiologies are multiple and varied but appendicular perforation remains the primary cause with 20 out of 40 cases, hence the need for close interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p>The diagnosis is mainly clinical and the treatment is medical-surgical. Correct resuscitation could improve the prognosis. Mortality is high and is mainly linked to delay in consultation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>To patients who have given their informed consent, to the staff of the general surgery department of the CS Ref of commune I of the Bamako district.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>There is no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Cheickna, T., Hamidou, S., Amadou, M., Hamadoun, C.A., Issaka, D., Modibo, S., Modibo, T., Tientigui, D.B., Alhassane, T., Adegne, T.P. and Lassana, K. (2023) Acute Peritonitis at the Reference Health Center of Commune I of the District of Bamako: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects. Surgical Science, 14, 728-737. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2023.1412079</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.130102-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Proske, J.M. and Franco, D. (2005) P&amp;#233ritonite Aigu&amp;#235. La Revue du Praticien (Paris), 55, 2167-2172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jean, Y.M. and Jean, L.C. (2001) P&amp;#233ritonite Aigu&amp;#235. La Revue du Praticien (Paris), 51, 2141-2145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alamowitch</surname><given-names> B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Traitement laparoscopique de l’ulc&amp;#232re duod&amp;#233nal perfor&amp;#233</article-title><source> Gastroent&amp;#233rologie Clinique et Biologique (Paris)</source><volume> 24</volume>,<fpage> 1012</fpage>-<lpage>1017</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blomqvist, P.G., Anderson, R.E., Granath, F., Lamb&amp;#233, M.P. and Ekbon, A.R. (2001) Mortality after Appendicectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996. Annals of Surgery, 233, 455-460. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200104000-00001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koslosk, A.M. (2004) The Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children: Outcomes of a Strategy Based on Pediatric Surgical. Pediatrics, 113, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.1.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brunel, A.S., Fraisse, T., et al. (2008) Une p&amp;#233ritonite sexuellement transmise. M&amp;#233decine et Maladies Infectieuses, 38, 233-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2008.01.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giessling, U., Petersen, S., Freitag, M., et al. (2002) Surgical Management of Severe Peritonitis. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 127, 594-597. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-32839</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramachandran, C.S. and Agarwal, S. (2004) Laparoscopic Surgical Management of Prerogative Peritonitis in Entries Fever: A Preliminary Study. Surge New Delhi, 14, 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000129387.76641.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanou</surname><given-names> D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Les p&amp;#233ritonites il&amp;#233ales d’origine typhique: Difficult&amp;#233 diagnostique et th&amp;#233rapeutique (&amp;#224 propos de 239 cas)</article-title><source> Burkina M&amp;#233dical</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 17</fpage>-<lpage>20</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sakhri</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Traitement des ulc&amp;#232res duod&amp;#233naux perfor&amp;#233s</article-title><source> La Tunisie M&amp;#233dicale</source><volume> 78</volume>,<fpage> 494</fpage>-<lpage>498</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demb&amp;#233l&amp;#233, M. (1974) Perforations typhiques de l’intestin gr&amp;#234le: A propos de 16 cas. M&amp;#233decine d’Afrique Noire, 21, 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fabiani, J.N. and Deloche, A. (1981) P&amp;#233ritonites aigues g&amp;#233n&amp;#233ralis&amp;#233es, formes cliniques, traitement chirurgical, 2&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#232me&lt;/sup&gt; &amp;#233dition mise &amp;#224 jour. Edition m&amp;#233dicale heure de France. 3-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dissa, B.A. (2012) Les p&amp;#233ritonites aigues: Aspects cliniques, diagnostiques et th&amp;#233rapeutiques &amp;#224 l’h&amp;#244pital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes. Th&amp;#232se m&amp;#233d., Bamako, N&amp;#186 53, 55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Harouna</surname><given-names> Y.D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Deux ans de chirurgie digestive d’urgence &amp;#224 l’h&amp;#244pital national de Niamey (Niger): Etude analytique et pronostique</article-title><source> M&amp;#233decine d’Afrique Noire</source><volume> 48</volume>,<fpage> 49</fpage>-<lpage>54</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonkoungou, P.G., Ouengr&amp;#233, E., Sanou, A., Traore, S.S. and Zida, M. (2013) Les p&amp;#233ritonites aigues gene-ralis&amp;#233es en milieu rural au Burkina Faso: &amp;#192 propos de 211 cas. Sciences de la sant&amp;#233, 1, 75-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gougard, P. and Barrat, C. (2000) Le traitement laparoscopique de l’ulc&amp;#232re duod&amp;#233nal perfor&amp;#233. R&amp;#233sultats d’une &amp;#233tude r&amp;#233trospective multicentrique. Annales de Chirurgie, 125, 726-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3944(00)00267-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mall&amp;#233, O.A. (2015) P&amp;#233ritonites au Cs r&amp;#233f de la commune I de Bamako: Aspects &amp;#233pid&amp;#233miologique, clinique et th&amp;#233rapeutique. Th&amp;#232se M&amp;#233d., Bamako, N&amp;#186 145, 43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kambir&amp;#233, J.L., Zar&amp;#233, C., Sanou, B.G. and Kambou, T. (2017) Etiologies et pronostic des p&amp;#233ritonites secondaires au centre hospitalier universitaire de Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). Journal Africain d’H&amp;#233pato-Gastroent&amp;#233rologie, 11, 149-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12157-017-0719-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Le Treut</surname><given-names> Y.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1993</year>)<article-title>Les p&amp;#233ritonites aigues: Physiologie, &amp;#233tiologie, diagnostic, &amp;#233volution, traitement</article-title><source> Revue du Praticien</source><volume> 43</volume>,<fpage> 259</fpage>-<lpage>262</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.130102-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pomata</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Vargiu</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Martinascol</surname><given-names> et al. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Our Experience in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diffuse Peritonitis</article-title><source> Chirurgia</source><volume> 23</volume>,<fpage> 193</fpage>-<lpage>198</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>