<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2023.1412055</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-129882</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Total Indicative Dose Determination in Water from the North Riviera Well Field of SODECI in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Epi</surname><given-names>Zita Tatiana Kocola Achi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bogbé</surname><given-names>Douo Louis Huberson Gogon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’Guessan</surname><given-names>Guy Léopold Oka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antonin</surname><given-names>Aka Koua</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marie</surname><given-names>Chantal Kouassi Goffri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institut de Recherche en Energies Renouvelables (IREN), Universit&amp;amp;eacute; Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire des Sciences de la Mati&amp;amp;egrave; re, Environnement et de l’Energie Solaire (LASMES), Universit&amp;amp;eacute; F&amp;amp;eacute; lix Houphou&amp;amp;euml;t Boigny, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Autorit&amp;amp;eacute;de Radioprotection de S&amp;amp;ucirc;ret&amp;amp;eacute; et de S&amp;amp;eacute; curit&amp;amp;eacute; Nucl&amp;amp;eacute; aire, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Acad&amp;amp;eacute;mie des Sciences des Arts des Cultures d’Afrique (ASCAD), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1006</fpage><lpage>1015</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Uranium-238 (
  <sup>238</sup>U), Thorium-232 (
  <sup>232</sup>Th) families and Potassium-40 (
  <sup>40</sup>K) are of terrestrial origin and contribute generally to an individual’s external exposure through our presence in this environment. They also contribute to the internal exposure through the ingestion of products and beverages such as water that are close to the earth. The aim of this work is to determine the committed effective dose or Total Indicative Dose (TID) due to gamma radioactivity of the borehole water from the Nord Riviera (NR) well field operated by the C&#244;te d’Ivoire Water Distribution Company (SODECI) for the supply of drinking water to part of the population of Abidjan. In addition, the populations, with their habits, could use these borehole waters directly as drinking water. To this end, water samples from the seven (07) functional boreholes were collected and analyzed on a gamma spectrometry chain, equipped with an HPGe detector in the laboratory of the Radiation Protection Institute (RPI) of the GHANA Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC). The results of the specific activities of 
  <sup>238</sup>U, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th and 
  <sup>40</sup>K obtained were transcribed into TID. As the natural radioactivity of the borehole water is high [1], the TIDs calculated from the activity results of the natural radionuclides
  <sup>238</sup>U, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th, and 
  <sup>40</sup>K vary for the seven boreholes from 0.150 to 0.166 mSv/yr with an average of 0.161 &#177; 0.034 mSv/yr. The TID of the control tower, where the borehole water is mixed and treated for household use, is equal to 0.136 &#177; 0.03 mSv/yr. The TIDs obtained are therefore all slightly greater than the WHO reference dose value of 0.1 mSv/yr. But all remain below the UNSCEAR reference dose of 0.29 mSv/yr.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>North Rivera (NR) Well Field</kwd><kwd> Borehole Water</kwd><kwd> Natural Radioactivity</kwd><kwd> Gamma Spectrometry</kwd><kwd> Total Indicative Dose</kwd><kwd> Committed Annual Effective Dose</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The earth’s crust is largely responsible for the formation and support of naturally occurring radioactive emitters, as far as the terrestrial elements are connected. The presence and distribution of radioactivity in groundwater is largely dependent on factors such as the local geological characteristics of the source, soil or rock through which the water flows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref3">3</xref>] . Sometimes they also depend on the influence of several nearby anthropogenic activities that may constitute important pollution sources.</p><p>In C&#244;te d’Ivoire and particularly in the greater Abidjan region, water resources are dependent on underground reserves, which are mainly contained in the sandy-clay formations of the Continental Terminal (CT) and sandy Quaternary. The CT aquifer develops in the Akou&#233;do zone. It is exploited by SODECI through the North Riviera (NR) well field for the supply of drinking water to part of the city of Abidjan. It should also be noted that some inhabitants in the area still use this groundwater directly for drinking and other daily needs via wells. It is therefore necessary to evaluate the effective dose that could be committed by the natural radioactive activity contained in this groundwater.</p><p>The aim of this work is to determine the dosimetric impact of the natural gamma radioactivity of the borehole water on the population of the communes supplied by the NR well field and the local population that uses this water directly.</p><p>As part of this study a sampling at the seven functional boreholes and the control or treatment tower took place in July 2018 at the NR well field. The calculated committed effective doses were obtained by taking into account the specific activities of the primary radioelements <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Overview of the Study Area</title><p>The samples were collected from the NR well field of SODECI, in the town of Cocody, precisely in the Akou&#233;do zone. It is composed of 10 boreholes, 7 of which were operating continuously with an average flow rate of 250 m<sup>3</sup>/hour/ borehole. The well field is located at the north of the former Akou&#233;do landfill site, around 5 km away. Groundwater sampling was carried out in the functional boreholes, on July 25, 2018.</p><p>The samples were collected from the boreholes in the order of their geographical positions which are F02, F03, F09, F10, F16, F18, F20 and then in the control tower (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>All groundwater from different boreholes is mixed and treated in control tower before being distribute for household consumption. It should be noted</p><p>that all boreholes are at least 120 m deep (source: SODECI).</p><p>The geological profile of the area is made up of sandy clay, medium sand and coarse sand resting on a granitic and schistose base [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref4">4</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The water table that develops in the Akouedo zone is the CT aquifer. C&#244;te d’Ivoire integrated water resources management master plan shows that this aquifer is essentially composed of sandy clay and sand (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Method</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sampling Method</title><p>As the boreholes were equipped with pumps, the water was sample directly into 1.5 L polyethylene bottles previously washed with nitric acid, then with distilled water and finally with the sample to be taken. During sampling, physical parameters such as temperature, conductivity and pH were measured. The bottles were filled to the brim and the caps screwed on to prevent any gas exchange with the atmosphere. Finally, the labeled water samples were stored in a cooler at a temperature below 6˚C sent to the Radiation Protection Institute (RPI) laboratory of the GHANA Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) for preparation and analysis.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes all the samples collected, coded in addition to their GPS location.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Sample Analysis Method</title><p>Sample preparation and radionuclide analysis were performed in the laboratory of the Radiation Protection Institute (RPI) at GAEC.</p><p>The samples were homogenized and transferred into one-liter marinelli beakers without filtration. The marinellis were previously washed with distilled water, dried and rinsed with acetone to avoid any contamination. In order to maintain the radioactive balance between parents and short-lived progeny, the homogenized samples were hermetically sealed. Then they were weighed, stored for 1 month and analyzed using a high purity germanium detector calibrated in energy and efficiency with a multi-gamma standard source. The gamma-ray spectrometry system used for the analysis consists of an N-type Hyper Pure Germanium detector. The relative efficiency of the detector is 25℅ with an energy resolution of 1.8 keV on the 1332 keV photopic of <sup>60</sup>Co.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Activity Concentration</title><p>The detector has been calibrated in terms of energy and efficiency with a standard</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Borehole water sample codes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Borehole water samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample code</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Geographical GPScoordinates</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point X</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point Y</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling 02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.940513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.385342</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling 03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.94452</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.379404</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.941827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.383102</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.942809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.381667</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.939799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.374182</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.943129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.380795</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drilling 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.938946</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.386214</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control tower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.940293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.374087</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>source composed of different gamma-emitting radionuclide of well-know concentrations. These energies are defined in the energy range from 122 KeV to 1836.063 KeV (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) thus covering all the low, medium and high energies of the spectrum.</p><p>After background subtraction, the radionuclide activity A, expressed in Bq/L is defined by the following equation:</p><p>A = N n e t ( E ) ε ( E ) ⋅ t ⋅ I λ ⋅ M (1)</p><p>N<sub>net</sub> (E): the net peak area;</p><p>ε (E): eﬃcounting efficiency for E energy;</p><p>I<sub>γ</sub>: the probability of emission of a gamma ray of energy E;</p><p>t: the counting time in seconds;</p><p>M: sample volume (L).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Internal Exposure Dose</title><p>The recommended drinking water limits, in terms of radioisotope content, are calculated so that the annual dose to an individual from drinking water does not exceed 0.1 mSv [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref2">2</xref>] . Thus, the final assessment of a water is based on the calculated dose indicator and the Total Indicative Dose (TID) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The TID is the committed effective dose resulting from an intake, for one year, of all natural and artificial radionuclides detected in a water supply, excluding radon and its short-lived progeny.</p><p>For this estimate of committed effective doses, as recommended by the model used by the WHO, the following were taken into account:</p><p>- the annual water consumption equivalent to 730 L∙year<sup>−1</sup> for an adult over 17 years old,</p><p>- the volumetric activities of radionuclides <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K in borehole water,</p><p>- the effective dose coefficients per unit of intake for an adult prescribed by the WHO 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The dose is thus calculated from the following formula:</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of the mixture of radionuclides contained in the standard source</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Radionuclides</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Energies (keV)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cobalt-57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerium-139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.864</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pewter-113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >391.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cesium-137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yttrium-88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >898.042</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cobalt-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1173.237</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cobalt-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1332.501</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yttrium-88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1836.063</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>E = 730 &#215; ( DCF U &#215; A U + DCF Th &#215; A Th + DCF K &#215; A K ) (2)</p><p>With A<sub>U</sub>, A<sub>Th</sub>, A<sub>K</sub> the concentrations of the measured activities,</p><p>DCF<sub>i</sub> (i = U, Th, K) the conversion factors for water.</p><p>Conversion factors for water or committed effective dose per unit of intake of radionuclide i ingested by an adult according to the WHO (2004) are:</p><p>DCF U = 4.5 &#215; 10 − 5 mSv / Bq ; DCF Th = 2.3 &#215; 10 − 4 mSv / Bq ; DCF K = 6.2 &#215; 10 − 6 mSv / Bq .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>The natural radionuclides measured during the analysis of the samples are <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K. These samples have activities of the elements measured that are higher than the limit values given in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref1">1</xref>] . Thus, using these specific activities, the committed effective doses of the said radionuclides were obtained (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>It can be seen that the annual effective doses due to ingestion of radionuclides in all samples show annual effective dose values slightly above the dose reference value of 0.1 mSv/yr established by the WHO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>It is truly indicative when calculating the TID for borehole water samples, as only the water from the control tower distributed to households is likely to be consumed.</p><p>The natural radioactivity of the water is above the quality reference. However, we note that the annual effective dose values of the groundwater samples ranging from 0.150 to 0.166 mSv/yr are higher than that of the control tower (0.136 mSv/yr) where all water is treated. This could be due to the treatment at the control tower. Indeed, most radionuclides can be effectively removed in water treatment facilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>It should be noted that if the dose is between 0.1 mSv/year and 0.3 mSv/year</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Radiological parameters and committed effective doses of the different samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Radionuclide activity Bq/L</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >E or TID (mSv/yr)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>238</sup>U</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>232</sup>Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68 &#177; 0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.160 &#177; 0.034</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.36 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164&#177; 0.034</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55&#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.87 &#177; 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.165&#177; 0.040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.36 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164&#177; 0.034</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.35 &#177; 0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.156 &#177; 0.032</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14 &#177; 0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.166 &#177; 0.038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#177;0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.49 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.150 &#177; 0.028</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 &#177;0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.24 &#177;0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.136 &#177; 0.030</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(which is the case for our samples), groundwater remediation is not mandatory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref8">8</xref>] . On the other hand, it is mandatory to inform consumers who may use this water directly, in particular from boreholes (wells) for drinking or washing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref10">10</xref>] . Nevertheless, dilution with another available ressource can help reduce the dose of these water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In terms of health impact, the International Commission on Radiological Protection’s (ICRP) conservative assumption is that there is no exposure threshold below which there is no risk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Indeed, experience has shown that in practice the annual dose of 0.1 mSv/year exceeded indicates that the screening level of gross alpha activity of 0.5 Bq/L is also been exceeded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref8">8</xref>] . Alpha particles emitted by uranium ingested in water could lead to the massive destruction of the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecule [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref13">13</xref>] . High concentrations of uranium in drinking water may increase the risk of kidney damage in humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref14">14</xref>] . Risks to the esophagus and stomach are also advanced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>With regard to the water at the control tower, it is possible that after treatment of the water from the boreholes, the effective doses are below the guide value (TID &lt; 0.1 mSv/year), making the water fit for consumption. It is true that the communes of Treichville, Marcory, Koumassi and Port-bouet in southern Abidjan supplied by the RN wellfield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref15">15</xref>] have effective dose values below the reference value of 0.1 mSv/year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref13">13</xref>] . In fact, certain water treatments can lead to a significant reduction in natural radioactivity. These include, among others, coagulation/flocculation, iron removal/demanganization, decarbonation with lime, decantation/filtration, filtration on a support covered with metal oxides etc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>However, the doses measured in the water samples are all below the reference dose of 0.29 mSv/year established by UNSCEAR 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref17">17</xref>] . Consequently, the consumption of these waters would be without serious danger to the population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The present study enabled us to calculate the Total Indicative Doses from the results of the activities of the natural radionuclides <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K, measured during the analysis of the borehole water samples at the laboratory of the Institute of Radiation Protection at GAEC. The borehole water from the NR well field is used by the C&#244;te d’Ivoire Water Distribution Company (SODECI) to supply drinking water to part of the population of Abidjan. The results of the analyses showed a high natural radioactivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129882-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The TIDs calculated from the natural radionuclide activity results of <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K for the seven boreholes vary from 0.150 to 0.166 mSv/yr with an average of 0.161 &#177; 0.034 mSv/yr. That of the mixing tower where the borehole water is treated for distribution to households is equal to 0.136 &#177; 0.03 mSv/yr and is lower than the TID of the borehole water due to the treatment provided. The calculated TID are slightly higher than the WHO reference dose value of 0.1 mSv/yr. Although the natural radioactivity of the borehole and control tower water is slightly higher than the TID quality reference, corrective actions are not necessarily justified. Also, their consumption, even from wells, would not be a serious danger for the population according to the UNSCEAR.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the Academy of Sciences, Arts and Cultures of Africa (ASCAD). The authors are grateful for the financial support for this work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Achi, E.Z.T.K., Gogon, B.D.L.H., Oka, N.G.L., Koua, A.A. and Goffri, M.C.K. (2023) Total Indicative Dose Determination in Water from the North Riviera Well Field of SODECI in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. Journal of Environmental Protection, 14, 1006-1015. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2023.1412055</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129882-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kocola Achi, &amp;Eacute;.Z.T., Gogon, B.D.L.H., Djagouri, K. and Kouassi Goffri, M.C. (2022) &amp;Eacute;valuation de la radioactivit&amp;eacute; dans les eaux de forage du champ de captage North Riviera Sodeci &amp;agrave; Abidjan, C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 12, 64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gainon, F. (2008) Les isotopes radioactifs de la s&amp;eacute;rie de l’uranium-238 (222Rn, 226Ra, 234U et 238U) dans les eaux thermales de Suisse. Th&amp;egrave;se de Doctorat de l’Universit&amp;eacute; de Neuch&amp;acirc;tel, 160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Direction G&amp;eacute;n&amp;eacute;rale de la Sant&amp;eacute; (DGS), Institut de Radioprotection et de Suret&amp;eacute; Nucl&amp;eacute;aire (IRSN), Autorit&amp;eacute; de Suret&amp;eacute; Nucl&amp;eacute;aire (ASN) (2011) La qualit&amp;eacute; radiologique de l’eau de robinet en France 2008-2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kou Ame, I.K., Gone, D.L., Savane, I., Kouassi, E.A., Koffi, K., Goula, B.T.A. and Diallo, M. (2006) Mobilit&amp;eacute; relative des m&amp;eacute;taux lourds issus de la d&amp;eacute;charge d’Akou&amp;eacute;do et risque de contamination de la nappe du continental terminal (Abidjan-C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire). Revue Afrique Science, 2, 39-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjiri, O.A. (2010) &amp;Eacute;valuations environnementale et du risque sanitaire li&amp;eacute;s &amp;agrave; la pr&amp;eacute;sence d’une d&amp;eacute;charge sauvage en secteurs r&amp;eacute;sidentiels dans un pays en voie de d&amp;eacute;veloppement: Cas de la d&amp;eacute;charge d’Akou&amp;eacute;do (Abidjan, C&amp;ocirc;te d’ivoire). Th&amp;egrave;se de Doctorat de l’universit&amp;eacute; de Cocody-Abidjan, 314 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanyu (2001) Plan directeur de gestion int&amp;eacute;gr&amp;eacute;e des ressources en eau en r&amp;eacute;publique de C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. KAT AHRA &amp; Engineers International, Abidjan, 251 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loyen, L., et al. (2003) Strat&amp;eacute;gie analytique des eaux destin&amp;eacute;es &amp;agrave; la consommation humaine. IRSN.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS, Organisation mondiale de la sant&amp;egrave; (2004) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 3rd Edition, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sant&amp;eacute; Canada (2019) Recommandations pour la qualit&amp;eacute; de l’eau potable au Canada: Document technique-L’uranium. Bureau de l’eau, de l’air et des changements climatiques, Direction g&amp;eacute;n&amp;eacute;rale de la sant&amp;eacute; environnementale et de la s&amp;eacute;curit&amp;eacute; des consommateurs, Sant&amp;eacute; Canada, Ottawa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isabelle de Guido (2010) La radioactivit&amp;eacute; naturelle dans les eaux de consommation. M&amp;eacute;moire de fin d’&amp;eacute;tudes de l’Ecole Nationale de la Sant&amp;eacute; Publique, 22-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Autorit&amp;eacute; de Suret&amp;eacute; Nucl&amp;eacute;aire (ASN) (2005) Note relative au contr&amp;ocirc;le sanitaire de la qualit&amp;eacute; radiologique des eaux destin&amp;eacute;es &amp;agrave; la consommation humaine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B&amp;ouml;hm, L. (2007) Etude de la radioactivit&amp;eacute; des eaux potables de Bretagne et perspective d’&amp;eacute;valuation du risque sanitaire &amp;eacute;ventuel li&amp;eacute; au radon. M&amp;eacute;moire de l’Ecole Nationale de la Sant&amp;eacute; Publique, 69 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Claude, K.P. (2017) Evaluation des risques sanitaires dus &amp;agrave; l’exposition du public &amp;agrave; la radioactivit&amp;eacute; des eaux de consommation dans le district autonome d’Abidjan. Th&amp;egrave;se de Doctorat de l’Universit&amp;eacute; de Cocody-Abidjan, 1-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pr&amp;eacute;parer par Gestion des ressources hydriques Manitoba et Sant&amp;eacute; Manitoba (2011) La pr&amp;eacute;sence d’uranium dans les sources d’approvisionnement d’eau au Manitoba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baidai, Y.D.A. (2011) Analyse de cycle de vie appliqu&amp;eacute;e &amp;agrave; un syst&amp;egrave;me de production d’eau potable: Cas de l’unit&amp;eacute; industrielle SODECI Nord Riviera. M&amp;eacute;moire pour l’obtention du master de G&amp;eacute;nie de l’Environnement de l’universit&amp;eacute; Nangui Abrogoua.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Canada (2009) Recommandations pour la qualit&amp;eacute; de l’eau potable au Canada: Document technique—Param&amp;egrave;tres radiologiques. https://www.canada.ca/fr/sante-canada/services/publications/vie-saine/recommandations-pour-qualite-eau-potable-canada-document-technique-parametres-radiologiques.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129882-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNSCEAR, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Annexes, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>