<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJGas</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Gastroenterology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-9450</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojgas.2023.1312039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJGas-129803</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Indications and Findings of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Elderly Patients in Parakou, Republic of Benin
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khadidjatou</surname><given-names>Sake</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dénis</surname><given-names>Coffi Fanou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Euloge</surname><given-names>Houndonougbo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marie-Claire</surname><given-names>Balle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Astrid</surname><given-names>Alexandrine Hountondji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aboudou</surname><given-names>Raïmi Kpossou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luc</surname><given-names>Valère Codjo Brun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Sehonou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Kodjoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Hepato-Gastroenterology Unit, Military Hospital—Teaching Hospital of Parakou, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Hepato-Gastroenterology Unit, Saint Jean de Dieu Hospital of Tanguiéta, Tanguiéta, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>411</fpage><lpage>419</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Elderly people are considered fragile and at greater risk of having malignant gastrointestinal tumors. The objective of this work was to report the reasons for performing gastrointestinal endoscopy and the lesions found during the endoscopy of this target population in Parakou.
   Patients and Study Methods: This was a descriptive and cross-sectional study with a retrospective collection of data from January 2016 to December 2017, then from January 2020 to December 2021. It took place in the Regional Teaching Hospital of Borgou-Alibori in Parakou and in the private gastrointestinal endoscopy center of Parakou (Northern Gastrointestinal Exploration Center). All patients aged at least 60 years who had undergone an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the study period were included. The variables studied were: the sex, age, indications for the examination, endoscopic lesions and data from the anatomo-pathological examination. 
  Results: In total, out of 1540 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed during the study period, 249 (16.17%) involved patients aged 60 years and over. The sex ratio was 1.26. The main indication for the examination was epigastric pain (123 cases, 
  <em>i.e.</em> 49.40%) followed by vomiting (53 cases, 
  <em>i.e.</em> 21.29%). In terms of lesions, non-tumorous gastropathy came first in the stomach (206 cases, 
  <em>i.e.</em> 82.73%) while esophageal lesions were dominated by esophageal candidiasis and cardial incompetence (39 cases,
  <em> i.e. </em>15.66% in each of the two situations). In the duodenum, ulcer was noted in 30 patients (12.05%). In 38 patients, 12 (31.58%) were tested positive for 
  <em>Helicobacter pylori</em> infection. Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract were confirmed in 11 patients (4.42%). 
  Conclusion: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains an excellent examination for the exploration of the upper gastrointestinal tract. In Parakou, epigastric pain represents the main indication for this examination in subjects over 60 years of age. Inflammatory or ulcerated non-tumorous gastropathy is the most commonly endoscopic lesion. Esophageal and gastric cancers are less common in this population group according to our study.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</kwd><kwd> Elderly Subjects</kwd><kwd> Inflammatory Gastropa-thy</kwd><kwd> Candidiasis</kwd><kwd> Cancer</kwd><kwd> Parakou</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Although diseases occur regularly, the world population continues to live longer. A subject is considered elderly when he or she is 60 years of age or older [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref1">1</xref>] . Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) is an examination allowing the exploration of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Its semi-invasive nature explains the reluctance of some practitioners to request this examination in elderly subjects, whereas UGIE without general anesthesia is well tolerated by 97.5% of these subjects in Mali [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] and by 88% of them in Senegal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] . It has been proven that this examination is extremely useful in elderly subjects for diagnosis and therapeutic management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref5">5</xref>] . According to a Japanese study, very elderly subjects (over 85 years of age) benefited more from therapeutic procedures during routine gastrointestinal endoscopy than young subjects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref6">6</xref>] . The incidence of gastrointestinal diseases, in particular cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, increases with age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref6">6</xref>] . In addition to cancers, elderly people also tend to present benign diseases such as gastritis and gastric or duodenal ulcers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref6">6</xref>] . In a Turkish study of gastroesophageal reflux disease, elderly patients rarely had typical and severe symptoms compared to younger patients. However, significantly more severe endoscopic lesions were observed in older patients compared to younger patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref7">7</xref>] . In Benin, more precisely in the northern part, few data are available on gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly subjects. We need more information about the application of upper GI system endoscopy in the elderly population. The objective of this work was to report the reasons for performing UGIE and the lesions found among elderly patients explored in Parakou in the Republic of Benin.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Study Methods</title><p>Type and period of study</p><p>This was a descriptive and cross-sectional study with a retrospective data collection. It covered a period of 4 years from January 2016 to December 2017 and from January 2020 to December 2021.</p><p>Study sites</p><p>The study took place in Parakou, in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Reginal Teaching Hospital of Borgou-Alibori (CHUD-B/A) and in the Northern Gastrointestinal Exploration Center (CEDIS).</p><p>Study population</p><p>This study focused on patients admitted for the performance of UGIE whatever the indication.</p><p>&#183; Inclusion criteria: All patients aged at least 60 years who had performed UGIE during the study period were included.</p><p>&#183; Exclusion criteria: Patients in whom the UGIE was incomplete for whatever reason (an impenetrable stenosis with the adult endoscope without an identified lesion, poor tolerance of the examination) were excluded.</p><p>Variables</p><p>The variable of interest was the finding of UGIE in these elderly patients. The other variables studied were: the sex, indication for UGIE, endoscopic lesions and anatomo-pathological data when available. Data were collected on the basis of UGIE reports.</p><p>Sampling</p><p>It was non-probabilistic. We carried out an exhaustive recruitment of patients admitted for the performance of UGIE during the study period.</p><p>Performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy</p><p>The samples were immediately fixed in 10% formalin and then sent to the anatomic pathology laboratory with an information sheet filled out by the doctor. It should be noted that in the event of poor tolerance of UGIE, biopsies were not performed.</p><p>Performance of anatomo-pathological examination</p><p>The histological examination of all samples was carried out by two pathologists. It took place in several stages including macroscopy, circulation, inclusion, microtomy, staining, assembly and microscopy.</p><p>Data collection</p><p>Data were collected using the registers of gastrointestinal endoscopy report and anatomo-pathological examination.</p><p>Data processing and analysis</p><p>The data were recorded in Excel 2019. The qualitative variables were expressed as number and percentage and the quantitative variables as mean &#177; standard deviation when the distribution was normal, otherwise as median with the 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> quartiles.</p><p>Ethical considerations</p><p>In this retrospective study, the data collected were used anonymously and confidentially.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>General data</p><p>During the study period, 1636 patients performed UGIE at the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of CHUD-B/A and at CEDIS. Ninety-six (96) patients were excluded because the examination was incomplete without any endoscopic lesion. The study therefore focused on the remaining 1540 patients (872 at CEDIS, i.e. 56.62% and 668 at CHUD-B/A, i.e. 43.38%). See the flow chart for the selection process of the patients at the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Frequency of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients</p><p>Out of the 1540 UGIE considered, 249 were performed in elderly patients, representing a frequency of 16.17%.</p><p>Data on gender and age</p><p>There were 139 men and 110 women. The sex ratio was 1.26. Their average age was 67.15 &#177; 6.38 years with the extremes of 60 and 90 years. The distribution of patients according to age groups is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The age group from 60 to 64 years was the most represented (94, i.e. 37.75%).</p><p>Data on indications of UGIE</p><p>Epigastric pain was the main indication (123, i.e. 49.40%) followed by vomiting (53, i.e. 21.29%) and weight loss (40, i.e. 16.06%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes the indications for UGIE in elderly subjects in Parakou.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of elderly patients according to indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (n = 249, 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, Parakou)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epigastric pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vomiting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight loss</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dyspepsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dysphagia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retrosternal pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematemesis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal pain*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Melena</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyrosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odynophagia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Regurgitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hiccups</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic liver disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anemia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematochezia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caustic ingestion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrhea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.40</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Abdominal pain other than epigastric location; A patient could have several symptoms at once.</p><p>Data on endoscopic lesions</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the distribution of elderly patients according to the endoscopic lesions. The endoscopic lesions found were mainly non-tumorous gastropathies (206, i.e. 82.73%). Lesions suspected to be malignant were noted in 40 patients (16.06%) including 31 gastric, 8 esophageal and 1 duodenal. The UGIE was macroscopically normal in 2 patients (0.80%).</p><p>Depending on the segment of the upper gastrointestinal tract considered, esophageal damage was dominated by esophageal candidiasis and cardial incompetence in the same proportions (39 cases), representing 15.66% for each of the lesions, followed by peptic esophagitis (38 cases, i.e. 15.26%). In the stomach, the lesions were mainly inflammatory or ulcerated non-tumorous gastropathy (206 cases, i.e. 82.73%) followed by gastric tumors (31 cases, i.e. 12.45%). Duodenal lesions were dominated by duodenal ulcer (30, i.e.12.05%) and bulbitis (30, i.e. 12.05%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> specifies the distribution of elderly patients according to the type of gastropathy on UGIE. It appears that non-tumorous gastropathies were mainly erythematous (195 cases, i.e. 94.66%) and ulcerated (69 cases,</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of elderly patients according to endoscopic lesions visualized (n = 249, 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, Parakou)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Esophageal injuries</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Esophageal candidiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cardial incompetence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peptic esophagitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hiatal hernia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Esophageal varices</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Esophageal tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foreign bodies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extrinsic compression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Gastric lesions</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-tumorous gastropathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastric tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastric ulcer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastric varices</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caustic injury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastric polyp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Duodenal lesions</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duodenal ulcer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulbitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duodenal tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.40</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A patient could have several lesions at once.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of elderly patients with non-tumorous gastropathy according to the type of gastropathy on UGIE (n = 206, 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, Parakou)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erythematous gastropathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ulcerated gastropathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Micronodular gastropathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Portal hypertension gastropathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.43</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A patient could have several types of gastropathy at once.</p><p>i.e. 33.49%). Portal hypertension gastropathy was rare (5 cases, i.e. 2.43%)</p><p>Data on the findings of the pathological examination</p><p>Out of the 249 elderly patients who underwent UGIE, 38 (15.26%) were able to perform the anatomo-pathological examination of the biopsies. Among them, 12 (31.58%) suffered from Helicobacter pylori infection. Among the 40 elderly patients with endoscopic lesions suspected to be malignant, 23 (57.50%) were able to perform anatomo-pathological examination of the biopsies. The malignant nature of the lesion was confirmed in 11 patients (47.82%), including 8 of gastric site and 3 of esophageal location. The gastric cancers were all adenocarcinomas (3 poorly differentiated, 2 moderately differentiated, 2 signet ring cell types and 1 well differentiated). As for the esophageal cancers, it was a squamous cell carcinoma in 2 patients and a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (one patient).</p><p>Among the 12 elderly patients in whom malignant lesions were suspected on UGIE without the confirmation of the anatomo-pathological examination, it was chronic gastritis (10 patients), severe esophageal inflammation (1 patient) and non-contributory biopsy sample (1 patient). In summary, the hospital frequency of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer in elderly subjects was 4.42% (11 cases out of 249, including 8 gastric and 3 esophageal cancers).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study on UGIE in elderly subjects is one of the first in the Republic of Benin. It allowed us to know the indications for this examination as well as the endoscopic lesions visualized in this population group.</p><p>The frequency of UGIE performance among elderly subjects is 16.17% in Parakou. This frequency varies from one country to another. Dia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] in Senegal from 2014 to 2017, Lawson-Ananissoh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref8">8</xref>] in Togo from 2009 to 2013, Tolo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] in Mali from 2020 to 2021, Ckere-Jehl et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref9">9</xref>] in France from 2004 to 2012, Bangoura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref10">10</xref>] in Ivory Coast from 2009 to 2016 reported 15.5%, 12.55%, 10.1%, 8.8% and 7.49%, respectively. This diversity in the results could be explained by the inclusion criteria which differ from one study to another (age greater than or equal to 60 years or 65 years or 75 years).</p><p>The average age of patients was 67.15 &#177; 6.38 years in the present study. This result is similar to those reported by Tolo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] in Mali (68.3 &#177; 6.4 years), Dia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] in Senegal (68 years), Lawson-Ananissoh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref8">8</xref>] in Togo (68.49 years).</p><p>The elderly subjects who underwent UGIE in Parakou were often male (sex ratio = 1.26), contrary to the findings made in Malian, Ivorian, Senegalese, Togolese and Turkish studies where the sex ratios were 0.9, 0.88, 0.82, 0.66 and 0.54, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Regarding the indications for UGIE, epigastric pain was the most common (49.40%). This result is similar to those found by Tolo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] in Mali (71.9%), Bangoura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref10">10</xref>] in Ivory Coast (38.36%), Dia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] in Senegal (55%) and Lawson-Ananissoh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref8">8</xref>] in Togo (47.29%).</p><p>In the present study, the endoscopic lesions were mainly non-tumorous and inflammatory gastropathy (82.73%). This could be explained by the frequent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by elderly people related to rheumatic pathologies. This predominance of non-tumorous gastropathy was noted in Mali (50%), Ivory Coast (39.81%), Senegal (44.4%) and Togo (59.73%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref10">10</xref>] . Esophageal candidiasis was common, this could be explained by the immunosuppression (advanced age, malignant tumor, comorbidity such as diabetes). Peptic esophagitis could also be induced by the cardial incompetence frequently noted in these elderly patients. Duodenal and gastric ulcers were observed in 44 elderly patients (17.67%). This high frequency of ulcers could be explained by the frequent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Helicobacter pylori infection.</p><p>In Parakou, confirmed upper gastrointestinal cancers were found in approximately 4 out of 100 elderly patients. A lower frequency (0.93%) was reported by Bangoura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref10">10</xref>] in Ivory Coast. Dia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref3">3</xref>] in Senegal found that gastric and esophageal cancers represented 2.5% and 2.3% of gastric and esophageal cancers in elderly subjects, respectively. A higher frequency (8.39%) of upper gastrointestinal cancers was noted in Togo from 2009 to 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref8">8</xref>] . In Turkey, the frequency of upper gastrointestinal cancers was higher (6.4%) in subjects aged 75 to 79 years and even higher (18%) in those aged over 80 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref4">4</xref>] . This confirms the fact that the risk of gastrointestinal cancer increases with age.</p><p>The main limitations of this study are, on the one hand, the low rate of performance of the anatomo-pathological examination of biopsies either because systematic samples were not taken during UGIE or because the samples were not examined due to lack of financial resources. On the other hand, there was a weak correlation (47.82%) between the endoscopic data and those of the pathological examination for lesions macroscopically suspected to be malignant. This could be related to the quality of the biopsy samples. In a Malian study, out of 8 malignant gastric tumors suspected on EOGD, 4 (50%) were confirmed on anatomo-pathological examination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129803-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Another limitation of this study is that its retrospective nature did not make it possible to specify the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the presence of comorbidities in these elderly patients.</p><p>Prospective studies are necessary in this population group to evaluate the relevance of the indications for UGIE, the tolerance of the examination and the factors associated with the presence of the different endoscopic lesions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains an excellent examination for the exploration of the upper gastrointestinal tract. In Parakou, this examination is requested in elderly people who often complain of epigastric pain. Non-tumorous and inflammatory gastropathy is the most common endoscopic lesion. Esophageal and gastric malignancies are uncommon in this population group. However, these tumorous lesions must be the dread of every doctor when faced with an elderly subject presenting digestive symptoms.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sake, K., Fanou, D.C., Houndonougbo, E., Balle, M.-C., Hountondji, A.A., Kpossou, A.R., Brun, L.V.C., Sehonou, J. and Kodjoh, N. (2023) Indications and Findings of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Elderly Patients in Parakou, Republic of Benin. Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 13, 411-419. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2023.1312039</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129803-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (2020) Décennie pour le vieillissement en bonne santé Stratégie et Plan d’action mondiaux sur le vieillissement et la santé 2016-2020: Vers un monde où chacun puisse vivre longtemps et en bonne santé. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_R3-fr.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolo, N., Binan, Y., Apeti, S., Cisse, S.O., Traore, A., Keita, K., et al. (2023) La Fibroscopie &amp;#338;sogastroduodénale chez le Sujet &amp;#194;gé à Bamako: Une étude de 121 Cas. Health Sciences and Disease, 24, 157-161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dia, D., Guèye, M.N., Diouf, G., Cissé, C.A.B., Ndiaye, M.D. and Mbengue, M. (2019) Results of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies in Elderly Patients at the General Hospital of Grand Yoff, Dakar, Senegal. Gut Gastroenterology, 2, 1-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ergen&amp;#231;, M. and Uprak, T. (2022) Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Single-Center Study. Cureus, 14, e21846. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21846</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, D.C., Collins, J.S.A. and Love, A.H.G. (1989) Outcome and Benefits of Upper Gastrointestinal endoscopy in the Elderly. Ulster Medical Journal, 58, 177-181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ryoichi, M., Naoki, H., Makoto, N., Kenro, H., Seiichiro, F., Yoshihiro, N., et al. (2018) Complications and Outcomes of Routine Endoscopy in the Very Elderly. Endoscopy International Open, 6, E224–E229. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-120569</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adanir, H., Bas, B., Pakoz, B., Günay, S., Camyar, H. and Ustaoglu, M. (2021) Endoscopic Findings of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease in Elderly and Younger Age Groups. Frontiers in Medicine, 8, Article ID: 606205.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawson-Ananissoh, L.M., Bouglouga, O., El-Hadji, Y.R., Bagny, A., Kaaga, L. and Redah, D. (2014) La fibroscopie digestive haute chez le sujet noir africain agé. Journal de la Recherche Scientifique de l’Université de Lomé, 16, 511-518.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clere-Jehl, R., Schaeffer, M., Vogel, T., Kiesmann, M., Pasquali, J.-L., Andres, E., et al. (2017) Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopies in Patients over 85 Years of Age; Risk-Benefit Evaluation of a Longitudinal Cohort. Medicine, 96, e8439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.000000000000843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129803-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bangoura, A.D., Bathaix, Y.M.F., Kouamé, G.D., Kissi, A.-K.H., Doffou, A.S., Mahassadi, K.A., et al. (2017) Apport de la Fibroscopie oesogastroduodénale (FOGD) dans la pathologie digestive du sujet agé en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Revue Internationale des Sciences Médicales, 19, 335-340.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>