<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJPathology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Pathology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-6775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojpathology.2024.141001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJPathology-129635</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Benign Nasosinus Tumors: Epidemiological, Clinical, Morphological, Therapeutic, and Evolutionary Aspects at the Adolphe SICE General Hospital in Pointe-Noire (Congo-Brazzaville)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sylvain</surname><given-names>Diembi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sydney</surname><given-names>Frousse Christian Ngatali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Harol</surname><given-names>Boris Otouana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gérard</surname><given-names>Chidrel Gouoni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Franck</surname><given-names>Itiere Odzili</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Donatien</surname><given-names>Moukassa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gontran</surname><given-names>Ondzotto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>ENT Department, Adolphe SICE General Hospital, Pointe-Noire, Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Master’s Department, Health &amp;amp; Human Biology, FSSA, UMNG, Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>ENT Department, Brazzaville Hospital and University Center, Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Oncology Department, Loandjili General Hospital, Pointe-Noire, Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Benign nasosinus tumors (BNST) of epithelial origin are relatively rare and arise from the various lining tissues of the nasal and sinus cavities, and from glands developed from these epithelial invaginations. These include nasosinusal polyps, pleiomorphic adenoma and inverted papilloma. The aim of our study was to investigate the epidemiological, clinical, morphological, therapeutic, and evolutionary particularities of these three clinical entities, including two tumors with the potential for progressive malignancy (pleiomorphic adenoma and inverted papilloma) and one strictly benign tumor with a favorable evolution (nasosinus polyp or Schneider polyp). 
  Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, analytical, cross-sectional study conducted from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2019 (13 years), in the Department of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery at Adolphe SICE Hospital, Pointe-Noire, Congo-Brazzaville. 
  Results: During the study period, 74 patients were registered for a nasosinus tumor, of which 23 were benign tumors of epithelial origin (31%) distributed as follows: 15 cases of nasosinus polyp, 5 cases of pleomorphic adenoma and 3 cases of inverted papilloma. The mean age was 42.5 for polyps, with an estimated median of 38, and 42.9 for the other two entities (pleomorphic adenoma and inverted papilloma), with an estimated median of 41. Nasosinus allergy accounted for 17% of cases, followed by chronic sinusitis (12%); however, in 49% of cases, the patient’s history was not specified. There was no sexual predominance, the sex ratio being 1.08. Occupation, socio-economic level, and education had no impact on the development of these tumors. Most of our patients (52%, 12 cases) had a consultation delay of more than one (1) year, whatever the histological nature of the tumor. The complete nasosinus syndrome (NSS) included nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, epistaxis, and anosmia, and was found in 19 cases (83%), most often reflecting a nasosinus polyp. CT scans were performed in all patients, with hyperdense images predominating in 22 cases. Management of benign nasosinus tumors was mainly surgical. Postoperative management was straightforward in 15 cases (65%). 
  Conclusion: Benign nasosinus tumors are dominated by nasosinus polyps. Management of these tumors is essentially surgical, with the best clinical outcome.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nasosinus Polyp</kwd><kwd> Pleomorphic Adenoma</kwd><kwd> Inverted Papilloma</kwd><kwd> Epidemiology</kwd><kwd> Clinical Features</kwd><kwd> Therapeutic Management</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Benign nasosinus tumors (BNSTs) of epithelial origin are relatively rare and arise from the lining epithelium of the nasal and sinus cavities, and from glands developed from epithelial invaginations. The three most common pose problems of diagnosis of certainty prior to surgical management. These include nasosinusal polyps, pleiomorphic adenomas and inverted papillomas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] . In the literature, some cases of inverted papilloma associated with highly oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV16 and 18) have been reported in the context of malignant degeneration, as have exceptional cases of pleomorphic adenoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref3">3</xref>] . Certain risk factors have also been reported, notably nasosinusal allergy and chronic sinusitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] . The complete nasosinus syndrome associating nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, epistaxis, and anosmia is the clinical argument for discussing the hypothesis of these entities without diagnostic certainty apart from histological confirmation of the surgical specimen.</p><p>In professional environments with limited resources, particularly in developing countries, these tumors pose a problem of diagnostic delay, often with aesthetic prejudice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref4">4</xref>] . The aim of our study was to examine the epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic, and evolutionary particularities of these tumors, and to report on our experience in their therapeutic management in view of the limited technical resources available.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>This is a retrospective, analytical, cross-sectional study conducted from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2019, a period of 13 years, in the Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery Department of the Adolphe SICE Hospital in Pointe-Noire, Congo-Brazzaville.</p><p>The general population consisted of patients referred to the department following a presumptive diagnosis of a nasosinus tumor. The study sample consisted of patients with histologically confirmed benign nasosinus tumors of epithelial origin. All non-processable files were excluded from the study.</p><p>A triple epidemiological, clinical and paraclinical survey was carried out to create a database of nasosinus tumors, as well as to collect therapeutic and evolutionary data from archived operating room records and from patients seen in medical consultations.</p><p>The study variables were epidemiological (age, sex, profession, socio-economic level, education), clinical (history, consultation delay, characteristics of symptoms and associated clinical signs, mode of onset, location), endoscopic, radiological, therapeutic, and evolutionary.</p><p>The anatomopathological study was carried out on surgical excisions of the polypoid formation, using 5 - 6 &#181;m sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. External macroscopic aspects and microscopic details were described: tumor architecture, cell arrangement, nature of the polyp lining, presence, or absence of histological criteria of malignancy (cytonuclear atypia, nucleocytoplasmic ratio, abnormal mitoses, neovascularization), presence or absence of ko&#239;locytes associated or not with disorganization of the tumor epithelium. On histological examination, two (2) groups were formed: group n˚1 (G1), comprising patients with a nasosinus polyp (NSP), and group n˚2, comprising patients with either a pleiomorphic adenoma (PA) or an inverted papilloma (IP).</p><p>Univariate and bivariate statistical analysis was performed using Excel 2017 software to create the database and calculate proportions. An associativity relationship was sought between epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary variables, using the Chi-square test with a p-value of 0.05.</p><p>The present work was carried out in the context of scientific and hospital research. The epidemiological and clinical investigation guaranteed the confidentiality of patient data. There were no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Univariate analysis yielded the following results of socio-demographic characteristics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Bivariate analysis was used to investigate the clinical, morphological, therapeutic, and evolutionary particularities of three clinical entities observed in our study.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Relative Frequency</title><p>During the study period, we recorded a total of 74 patients treated for nasosinus tumors, 23 of whom had benign tumors (31%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Age (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>)</title><p>The mean age was 42.5 for nasosinusal polyp, with an estimated median of 38,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N case</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Driver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secretary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Engineer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shopkeeper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.74%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hairdresser</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.09%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Socio-economic status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.78%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.52%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary (university)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Age distribution</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >AGE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NSP (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PA + IP (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[20 - 29 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[30 - 39 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[40 - 49 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[50 - 59 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥60 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>p &gt; 0.005. NSP = naso-sinusal polyp; PA= pleomorphic adenoma; IP = inverted papilloma.</p><p>and 42.9 for the other two entities (pleomorphic adenoma and inverted papilloma), with an estimated median of 41. There was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Clinical Aspects</title><p>Most of our patients (52%, 12 cases) had a consultation delay of more than one year, whatever the histological nature of the tumor (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The complete nasosinus syndrome (NSS) included nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, epistaxis, and anosmia, and was found in 19 cases (83%), most often reflecting a nasosinus polyp.</p><p>Nasosinus allergy accounted for 17% of cases, followed by chronic sinusitis (12%); however, in 49% of cases, the patient’s history was not specified.</p><p>In these 22 cases, the complete sinus syndrome was associated with headache, and in 2 cases and 1 case respectively with facial pain and lacrimation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>The onset of these symptoms was predominantly progressive in 23 cases (92%). Facial swelling was noted on inspection in 18 cases. This swelling affected the face (44%), cheek (2%), nasolabial fold (17%) and nasofrontal-orbital region (2%) respectively.</p><p>The location of benign nasosinus tumors was unilateral in 22 cases (88%), and bilateral in 3 cases (12%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Anterior rhinoscopy revealed an endonasal mass in 22 cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), and nasal congestion in 1 case.</p><p>The physical examination included an endobuccal, otological and ophthalmological examination. On endobuccal examination with a tongue depressor, palatal cupping was found in 8 cases. Otoscopy revealed seromucosal otitis in 2 cases. Ophthalmological examination revealed unilateral exophthalmos in 4 cases,</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Consultation deadline</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Consultation deadline</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NSP (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PA + IP (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;6 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[6 - 12 months]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;12 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>p &gt; 0.005.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Clinic features</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clinic Features</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PNS (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AP + PI (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete NSS = NO + RH + EP + AN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete NSSs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Nasosinusal syndrome (NSS) = nasal obstruction (NO), rhinorrhea (RH), epistaxis (EP), and anosmia (AN).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Tumor localization</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Localization</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PNS (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AP + PI (n case)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>p &gt; 0.005.</p><p>with visual acuity maintained.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Morphological Aspects</title><p>CT scans were performed in all patients, with hyperdense images predominating in 22 cases.</p><p>The most common histological type was nasosinus polyp in 15 cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), followed by pleomorphic adenoma in 5 cases, and inverted papilloma in 3 cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Therapeutic and Evolutionary Data</title><p>Management of benign nasosinusal tumors was mainly surgical, with three types of procedure performed: endoscopic (2 cases), vestibular (6 cases), CADWELL-LUC (4 cases) and DEGLOWIG (2 cases), and transfacial routes in 17 cases represented by the paralateronasal route of MOURE and SIBELIAU with a few variations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>The postoperative course was mostly straightforward in 16 cases (64%), with complications observed in 9 cases (36%); these depended on the therapeutic approach, with the transfacial approach accounting for 6 complications (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution by type of histology</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >HISTOLOIC FEATURES</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N CASE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inverted Papilloma (IP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pleiomorphic adenoma (PA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naso-sinusal polyp (NSP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>p &gt; 0.005.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Breakdown of postoperative findings by surgical procedure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TYPE OF PROCEDURE SURGICAL</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FOLLOW-UP</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complicated</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endoscopic pathways</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vestibular pathways</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transfacial pathways</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>p &gt; 0.005.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Socio-Demographic Features</title><p>The relative frequency in our study over a 13-year period was 33.7%. This frequency is close to Amana et al. in TOGO 4.78% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] , with lower frequencies observed in Koffi-Aka et al. in C&#244;te d’Ivoire 0.1% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref3">3</xref>] and Kharoubi et al. in Morocco 1.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref4">4</xref>] . The mean age was 43.76 years, with a median of 40 years and extremes from 22 to 84 years in our study, close to that of Amana et al. in Togo 36 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] . Among European authors, the average age is higher between 60 and 70 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref2">2</xref>] . There was no gender predominance: 13 men versus 12 women, giving a sex ratio of 1.08. However, most authors (Amana, Kharoubi, and Keita) describe a male predominance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref6">6</xref>] . Housewives were the most common occupation (32%), followed by teachers (28%) and petroleum engineers (16%). The cabinetmaker profession accounted for 3 cases, or 4.05%, although the study by Keita et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref6">6</xref>] reported only one case; indeed, the cabinetmaker profession was occupationally exposed to wood dusts, which are risk factors reported in the literature.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Clinical Aspects</title><p>Nasosinus allergy accounted for 17% of cases, followed by chronic sinusitis (12%); however, in 49% of cases, the patient’s history was not specified. There was no sexual predominance, the sex ratio being 1.08. Occupation, socio-economic level, and education had no impact on the development of these tumors.</p><p>Repeated personal history of allergy (17%) and chronic sinusitis (12%) were probably risk factors associated with the development of pseudo-inflammatory tumors. The delay in consultation was most often late, at 1 year (14 cases, 56%) or 6 months (10 cases), as reported by Kharoubi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref5">5</xref>] in Morocco.</p><p>Clinically, a complete nasosinus syndrome was found by most authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref6">6</xref>] . Facial swelling accounted for 22 cases (29%), although Amana et al. and Koffi-Aka et al. found 22.4% and 87% respectively.</p><p>The various phases of the physical examination (endobuccal tongue depressor, anterior rhinoscopy, otoscopy) are highly sensitive in evoking the clinical diagnosis, and must be carried out meticulously, especially in cases of palatal curvature (8 cases), unilateral endonasal mass (22 cases, 88%) and associated otitis (2 cases of seromucous otitis).</p><p>Complementary ophthalmological examination is an essential part of the physical examination, as it enables us to search for associated ophthalmic lesions (unilateral exophthalmos, with visual acuity, in 4 cases, 16%). This observation was made by Amana et al., who reported orbital involvement (12%), with reduced visual acuity in 5.6% of cases.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Morphological Features</title><p>On imaging, CT was the gold standard, with hyperdense images found in 22 cases (88%). Histologically, benign nasosinusal tumors were represented by naso-sinusal polyps in 15 cases (60%), followed by pleiomorphic adenomas in 5 cases (20%) and 33 cases (12%). Our results are close to those of Amana et al., Ette et al., who found 66.2% and 60% respectively for benign tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref7">7</xref>] . Papilloma was the most common histological form in the Amana et al. series, accounting for 20.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] , compared with 16.6% in the Koffi-Aka series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref4">4</xref>] . The results reported by some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref5">5</xref>] were low, at 19.70%.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Therapeutic Features and Evolutionary</title><p>Open surgery was our therapeutic strategy due to the weakness of the technical platform, and this is in line with the attitude of various sub-Saharan authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129635-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Benign nasosinus tumors are dominated by nasosinus polyps. In our practice, their relative frequency is estimated at around 30% of all tumors diagnosed over a period of more than ten years, with characteristics identical to those reported in the literature from sub-Saharan Africa. The complete nasosinus syndrome, together with rhinoscopy and CT scan data, constitutes a clinical criterion with a strong presumptive diagnosis; and the anatomopathological study of surgical specimens confirms the diagnosis with certainty. Management of these tumors is mainly surgical, with paralateronasal techniques predominating.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diembi, S., Ngatali, S.F.C., Otouana, H.B., Gouoni, G.C., Itiere Odzili, F., Moukassa, D. and Ondzotto, G. (2024) Benign Nasosinus Tumors: Epidemiological, Clinical, Morphological, Therapeutic, and Evolutionary Aspects at the Adolphe SICE General Hospital in Pointe-Noire (Congo-Brazzaville). Open Journal of Pathology, 14, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpathology.2024.141001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129635-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amana, B., Bissa, H., Pegbessou, E.P., Darre, T., Amegbor, K., Kpemissi, E. and Napo-Koura, G. (2013) Tumeurs naso-sinusiennes: Aspects épidémiologiques cliniques et anatomopathologiques à propos de 89 cas observés au CHU de Lomé. Revue Internationale du College d’Odonto-Stomatologie Africain et de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, 20, 33-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129635-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lucidi, D., Cantaffa, C., Miglio, M., Spina, F., Alicandri Ciufelli, M., Marchioni, A. and Marchioni, D. (2023) Tumors of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses: Promoting Factors and Molecular Mechanisms: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, 2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032670</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129635-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awosusi, B.L. and Rahman, A.T. (2023) Inverted Sinonasal Papilloma: Update and Literature Review. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, 21, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajmah/2023/v21i11925</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129635-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koffi-Aka, V., Ehouo, F., Nenkan, E. and Demeidoros, E. (2007) Caractéristiques histologiques des affections des cavités sinusiennes, Etude rétrospective à propos de 96 cas dans les services d’ORL à Abidjan. Medecine d’Afrique Noire, 54, 493-496.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129635-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kharoubi</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Profil histologique des tumeurs des fosses nasales. Revue générale à propos de 23 cas</article-title><source> JFORL</source><volume> 51</volume>,<fpage> 271</fpage>-<lpage>277</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129635-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Keita, M. and Kampo, M.I. (2009) Morbidité par tumeurs de la sphère tête et cou à Bamako. Mali Médical, 24, 25-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129635-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ette, A., Haeffner, G., Bamba, M., Cisse, G. and Fakhry, K. (1980) Notre expérience de la chirurgie en pathologie chirurgicale et pseudotumorale de la sphère ORL en milieu africain. Annales de l’Universite d’Abidjan. Serie B. Medecine, 15, 294-309.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>