<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ns
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Natural Science
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2150-4091
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2150-4105
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ns.2023.1511020
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ns-129567
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science, Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences, Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare, Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Unified Understanding of Cosmological Energy Fields: Exploring Gravitation, Repulsion, and More
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Pramod Kumar
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Agrawal
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aUniversal Theory Research Centre, Jaipur, India
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     29
    </day> 
    <month>
     11
    </month>
    <year>
     2023
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    11
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    263
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    284
   </lpage>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    First, we develop a unitary process that can explain all four physical activations: electromagnetic wave, electromagnetic force, repulsion, and attraction. Second, it is clarified that cosmological and physical entities relate to different levels of existence in the universe and, hence, cannot be considered under the same paradigm. We know that biological entities use physical substances as executants; analogously, physical entities use cosmological substances as executants. Therefore, we have introduced new terms for the cosmological substances used as executants in physical activities. Third, this study introduces the primary elements of the cosmological world, such as visibility, forcibility, fullness, and hollowness, and defines them according to their attributes. This study explains how different combinations and placements of primary elements create different cosmological fields. These fields are used in all physical activations. Finally, we explain the entity model and how all physical activations occur. This study concludes that all physical activations use primary elements and follow the same universal law. Therefore, this study addresses the untouched subject of the creation of repulsion and attraction (gravitation). Furthermore, it addresses several cosmic mysteries that are yet to be resolved.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cause of Gravitation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cause of Repulsion
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Model of Entity
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Unified Theory
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Multi-Disciplinary Approach
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <sec id="s1_1">
    <title>1.1. History of Quantum Machines and Particle Physics</title>
    <p>All physical activations are explained by quantum machines. We found the traces of the use of quantum machines date back to 1801 when Thomas Young discovered the wave formation in a double-slit experiment. In 1859, Gustav Kirchhoff proposed a theorem about blackbody radiation. To Boltzmann, the mysterious concept of entropy was first introduced in the work of the German Rudolph Clausius (1822-1888) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-1">
      1
     </xref>]. During the 19th century, several philosophers and scientists made important contributions to the field of space science. The modern concept of quantum physics came into existence when Max Plank introduced of quantization of energy in 1900 to explain blackbody radiation, while Einstein applied this idea to explain the photoelectric effect in 1905. In 1924, Louis de Broglie hypothesized that all matter is wave-like [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-2">
      2
     </xref>]. In 1925-1927, Werner Heisenberg introduced the uncertainty principle and the concept of wave-particle duality. Regarding particle physics, several atomic and subatomic particles were discovered up until the 20th century. Subsequently, scientists attempted to further break the particle to find the elementary physical particle (EPP); however, whatever they found could not be claimed as elementary because the possibilities of further breaking were not ruled out.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_2">
    <title>1.2. Addition to Prevailing Knowledge</title>
    <p>a) We argue that considering the cosmological and physical worlds under the same paradigm is the root problem of modern physics. These are two different levels similar to the physical and biological world.</p>
    <p>b) We provide here a brief terminology of cosmological terms.</p>
    <p>c) We explain how four basic cosmological substances create different cosmological fields by their ingredients (cosmological substances) and placements.</p>
    <p>d) We explain a model of EPP, which can receive, hold, and provide different fields.</p>
    <p>e) This model will explain the receiving cosmological fields, converting them into physical fields, providing a physical image, and reconverting them into cosmological fields.</p>
    <p>f) We explain here how the model represents all types of activation (such as electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic fields, attraction, and repulsion) by obeying the unitary process.</p>
    <p>g) We address several unanswered questions, such as cosmological constant, dark matter, dark energy based on the proposed theory.</p>
    <p>h) We explain the cause behind all activations, including gravitation and repulsion caused by mass and heat, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-3">
      3
     </xref>].</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_3">
    <title>1.3. Limitations of the Proposed Theory</title>
    <p>The proposed theory is based on cosmology and cannot be tested with available technology. Thus, we rely on inferences drawn from experiments conducted within the cosmological realm. To this end, we attempted to introduce novel terminology, but some words may confuse us with physical words due to preconceptions. In this study, we have demonstrated several hypotheses that may seem incorrect. However, all are connected by one thread, and we cannot leave any of them out when we consolidate them because it would cause a lack of clarity.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_4">
    <title>1.4. Terminology of Cosmological Words</title>
    <p>a) Cosmological substances appear in the form of their attributes: visibility, forcibility, fullness, and hollowness.</p>
    <p>b) Sense is the correlation between visibility and forcibility. Quantum is the correlation between fullness and hollowness.</p>
    <p>c) Space fabric, known as physical emptiness or aether, is the medium of all physical activities, including electromagnetic waves and gravitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-4">
      4
     </xref>].</p>
    <p>d) For all practical purposes, we have used the word “space fabric” instead of the prevailing word “space.”</p>
    <p>e) “Exertion” refers to the impulse offered by a physical object involved in attraction and repulsion.</p>
    <p>f) “Sensorial” refers to the impulse accepted by a physical object involved in attraction and repulsion.</p>
    <p>g) “Sensorial exertive pull” denotes attraction, and “sensorial exertive push” denotes repulsion.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_5">
    <title>1.5. Methodology</title>
    <p>The universal entropy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-5">
      5
     </xref>] progresses through countless levels of existence and is never satisfied with the progress. There are known levels that are cosmological, physical, biological, psychological, and intellectual. Each level is distinct in its way, albeit governed by the same universal laws [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-6">
      6
     </xref>]. Interestingly, the relationship between two successive levels is analogous owing to the applicability of the same universal law. We do not have complete knowledge of any level, but we do have some knowledge of each level. Therefore, it is possible to learn many things by substituting the known knowledge of one level with the unknown of another level using parallel laws and the guess proof [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-7">
      7
     </xref>]. For instance, humans absorb psychological symbols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-8">
      8
     </xref>], animals absorb biological food, and plants absorb physical matter. Hence, it can be inferred that matter absorbs cosmological energies. However, it is important to note that an incorrect substitution may lead to improper inference. Therefore, this philosophical methodology can be applied only after careful application of unitary logic and checking the results, which must follow practically proven facts. It has been stated, “If E is evidence for some hypothesis H, then E makes it more likely that H is true: in such circumstances, E confirms H” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-9">
      9
     </xref>]. This analogy can apply to issues where experimentation is impossible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-10">
      10
     </xref>].</p>
    <p>While structuring the model of an entity, we employ the concept of a “universal law” as a fundamental logic for incorporating the available knowledge of physics, biology, and psychology. We cross check the information from all directions to ensure accuracy. As Ayer once stated, “A rational man is one who makes a proper use of reason: and this implies, among other things, that he correctly estimates the strength of evidence” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-11">
      11
     </xref>]. We have a number of well-known experiments discussed in the paper. The author does not have any contradictions with the observations made therein; instead, he differs with the inferences drawn from the observations. Therefore, no additional experiments are required.</p>
    <sec id="s1">
     <title>2. Difference between Physical and Cosmological World</title>
     <p>We know that physical entities follow the fundamentals of biological entities, but do not follow biological science. Similarly, cosmological entities are the fundamentals of physical entities but do not follow physical science [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-12">
       12
      </xref>]. Some of the important differences are presented here:</p>
     <p>a) A living physical particle “feeds on” (receives and absorbs) a cosmological substance being pure energy (thermal and electric energy) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-13">
       13
      </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-14">
       14
      </xref>]. In contrast, cosmological substances cannot “feed on” physical particles.</p>
     <p>b) Energy (unlike a physical substance) is shapeless [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-15">
       15
      </xref>] and has no physical parameters comparable to a physical body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-16">
       16
      </xref>].</p>
     <p>c) An “inertial frame of reference” can be defined only for a physical entity, whereas a photon can simultaneously occupy different places [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-17">
       17
      </xref>].</p>
     <p>d) No matter how small the physical particle is, it will be a physical particle only. A boson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-18">
       18
      </xref>], which is the smallest available physical particle, can receive/store/emit heat and can be cooled down to −273.15˚C, as it is a physical particle.</p>
     <p>e) Flip Tanedo stated, “It’s sufficient for a particle to have the energy to have a meaningful sense of existence” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-13">
       13
      </xref>]; the opposite is not true.</p>
     <p>f) Electromagnetic waves and gravitational pulls are both executed by physical entities, using cosmological entities (energy fields) as their executants. It is just like biological entities execute physical substances, psychological entities execute bio-chemicals, and intellectual entities execute psychological emotional symbols.</p>
     <p>g) A plant has biological life, whereas molecules do not; instead, they have physical life. In the same way, physical matter has physical life, whereas cosmological energies do not; instead, they have cosmological life.</p>
     <p>h) We can photograph physical particles, but not cosmological particles such as light, thrust, and gravity. A photon (light particle) performs a photographic act itself.</p>
     <p>i) A physical mass can increase by acquiring energy, as described by the mass-energy conversion equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-19">
       19
      </xref>]. However, a photon cannot gain mass by acquiring another photon.</p>
     <p>j) Cain says, “But for the photon, there’s zero time elapsed between when it’s emitted and when it’s absorbed again. It doesn’t experience distance either” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-17">
       17
      </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-20">
       20
      </xref>]. In other words, cosmological substances do not experience physical parameters like distance and time. This phenomenon is also observed in quantum entanglement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-21">
       21
      </xref>].</p>
     <p>The above views are provided by different philosophers based on different experiments, indicating the difference between the cosmological and physical levels of the universe. “Our knowledge of cosmology is very limited” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-22">
       22
      </xref>], because we are taking physical and cosmological worlds within the same paradigm.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3">
    <title>3. Structure of Fields</title>
    <sec id="s3_1">
     <title>3.1. Evolution of Primary and Secondary Fields</title>
     <p>To understand the cosmological world, we must first introduce its basic elements. We have four imaginable cosmological substances named according to their attributes: visibility, forcibility, fullness, and hollowness. These cosmological substances are physically imperceptible and responsible for the creation of energy fields as well as the space fabric. First of all, we will discuss the energy fields; thereafter, we will discuss the space fabric and the structure of a physical entity, referring to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
       Figure 1
      </xref>.</p>
     <p>Cosmological substances have no direct relationship with the physical world, they create cosmological fields, which can be used as executants of physical entities. All cosmological fields are created with different combinations and placements of cosmological substances. The four cosmological fields are listed as follows:</p>
     <p>a) Visibility field: made of quantum (fullness-hollowness) and visible sensing (positive visibility-negative visibility), acts as the executant for the electromagnetic wave.</p>
     <p>b) Forcibility field: made of a quantum of (fullness-hollowness) and forcible sensing (positive forcibility-negative forcibility), acts as the executant for the electromagnetic force.</p>
     <p>c) Fullness field: made of sensing (visibility-forcibility) and fullness quantum (positive fullness-negative fullness), acts as the executant for the sensorial exertive push (repulsion).</p>
     <p>d) Hollowness field: made of sensing (visibility-forcibility) and hollowness quantum (positive hollowness-negative hollowness), acts as the executant for sensorial exertive pull (attraction).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_2">
     <title>3.2. Additional Note</title>
     <p>a) For all practical purposes, visibility (heat) represents diversity, while forcibility represents intensity, which is opposite attributes but complements each other, creating “sense.” Keeping “sense” constant and increasing diversity will reduce the intensity. In 2017, the HSI Sensing Team stated: “A magnet subjected to heat experiences a reduction in its magnetic field; when the same magnet is exposed to low temperatures, its magnetic property is enhanced, and the strength increases” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-23">
       23
      </xref>].</p>
     <p>b) For all practical purposes, fullness and hollowness are opposite attributes, but complement each other, creating “quantum.” The double-slit experiment demonstrates their opposition. It is stated: “We first note the pattern of light on the screen with just one slit open, then we open the second slit, admitting more light through the slits; however, some places on the screen, where there was visible light, go dark” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-24">
       24
      </xref>]. Herein, the authors argue that the light of the second slit has a component of “hollowness,” which cancels the fullness of the first slit. This proves that “hollowness” has an attribute that is opposite to “fullness.” After introducing the “negative fullness” wave, no difference remains between the water and electromagnetic waves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
       Figure 2
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>c) The positivity and negativity in attributes are derived from the space fabric, where each attribute has an average space density.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_3">
     <title>3.3. Interchange between Emitting Field and Receiving Field</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
       Figure 3
      </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
       Figure 4
      </xref> show the four activations: the electromagnetic wave and force, and the sensorial exertive push and pull. Each activation has two ends: one at the emitter and the other at the receiver. In the case of electromagnetic waves, the receiving entity receives the magnetic field from the emitter, converts it to the electric field, propagates it, and absorbs it [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-25">
       25
      </xref>]. To well stated that “electricity and</p>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 1. We have two kinds of senses: visibility and forcibility, and two kinds of quantum: fullness and hollowness. All fields are created using a combination of sense and quantum. The figure shows the different types of fields available. We have used the words “negative” and “positive.” These words pertain to the average density of space in relation to specific attributes.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId15.jpeg?20250924094115" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig2" position="float">
      <label>Figure 2</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 2. When only one slit is open, there is lighter than when two slits are open. This phenomenon provides evidence of the existence of a hollowness field as the second part of the electromagnetic wave.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId16.jpeg?20250924094115" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig3" position="float">
      <label>Figure 3</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 3. The figure demonstrates how the fields from the emitter are transformed into those of the receiver without altering the components.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId17.jpeg?20250924094115" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 4. To activate, two fields are involved: the emitter releases a dipolar field that expands spherically and the receiver picks up a monopolar field that expands linearly. When repulsion and attraction waves occur, both objects function as emitters and receivers, thereby producing stationary waves.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId18.jpeg?20250924094115" />
     </fig>
     <p>magnetism are two sides of the same phenomenon” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-26">
       26
      </xref>]. NASA specified that “a changing magnetic field will induce a changing electric field and vice-versa—the two are linked” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-27">
       27
      </xref>]. Both fields have the same constituents. When the constituents of the magnetic field are displaced at the right angle, the field converts into an electric field. The same phenomenon applies to other activations, too.</p>
     <p>The details of the four activations are as follows:</p>
     <p>a) Electromagnetic wave: It has a magnetic (heat) field at the emitter, described as the “quantum of available visibility,” and an electric (light) field at the receiver, described as the “available visibility of quantum.”</p>
     <p>b) Electromagnetic force: It has a magnetic field at the emitter, described as “quantum of available forcibility,” and an electric field at the receiver, described as “available forcibility of quantum.”</p>
     <p>c) Sensorial exertive push: It has an exertive (thrust) field at the emitter, described as “sensing of available fullness,” and a sensorial push field at the receiver, described as “available fullness of sensing.”</p>
     <p>d) Sensorial exertive pull: It has an exertive (drawing thrust) field at the emitter, described as “sensing of available hollowness,” and a sensorial push field at the receiver, described as “available hollowness of sensing.”</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_4">
     <title>3.4.Activation of Fields in Space Fabric</title>
     <p>All emitting fields are dipolar and, hence, cannot move in a linear direction. They expand spherically in all directions with a waveform. The wave has a crest and trough of positive and negative density of the concerned attribute, respectively. The receiver receives them in the form of electric and sensorial fields. These fields are monopolar and can propagate linearly in space, without influence of the distance. In the case of repulsion and attraction, only the sense is flowing (no quantum is flowing); hence, they are called stationary waves. In the case of electromagnetic waves and forces, the quantum is flowing; hence, they are referred to as moving waves. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
       Figure 3
      </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
       Figure 4
      </xref> show that all activations play the same role.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4">
    <title>4. Structure of Space Fabric</title>
    <p>Sbitnev stated: “We assume that dark energy and dark matter filling up the whole cosmic space behave as a special superfluid, here named superfluid quantum space” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-28">
      28
     </xref>]. Agreeing with Sbitnev, we propound that the aether or space fabric itself is made of cosmological substances, which carry the additional dark matter and dark energy as a superfluid within it. According to the theory (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>), the space fabric is composed of four cosmological substances: visibility, forcibility, fullness, and hollowness, arranged symmetrically in a way such that all attributes balance each other [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-4">
      4
     </xref>]. The theory suggests that the standard space fabric is emptiness with a positive nonzero space density in cosmological terms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-29">
      29
     </xref>]. Furthermore, the theory proposes that each substance has an average space density above zero, allowing for positive and negative characteristics. The fluctuation capability of the space fabric enables quantum transportation through electromagnetic waves and electromagnetic force as well as sense transportation through repulsion and attraction (gravitation).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5">
    <title>5. Model of the Elementary Physical Particle</title>
    <sec id="s5_1">
     <title>5.1. Life of Elementary Physical Particle</title>
     <p>Life is comprised of three essential elements: space, time, and consciousness. These three components work in unison to define the existence of a living entity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
       Figure 6
      </xref>). 1) The capability of space is dictated by coded information stored in the four chests of EPP, which also determines the characteristics of the entity. 2) Time is divided into three parts. The future is indicated by data flowing into the interaction chamber. The past is represented by data flowing out of the interaction chamber. The physical image of the entity represents the present. 3) Consciousness triggers the EPP to oscillate and activate all field areas, one by one, 90 degrees apart from each other along the wavelength. This composition of space, time, and consciousness resides in a square-shaped structure. We call it the living entity of the elementary physical particle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-30">
       30
      </xref>]. And life goes through the future to the present and to the past [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-31">
       31
      </xref>].</p>
     <fig id="fig5" position="float">
      <label>Figure 5</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 5. The primary unit of the space fabric comprises four attributes. The two vertical attributes balance each other out. The other two horizontal attributes balance each other out. The vertical and horizontal balance each other. Therefore, the result reaches zero. All attributes play a role in cosmological activation.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId19.jpeg?20250924094121" />
     </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5_2">
     <title>5.2. Justification of Square-Shaped Structure</title>
     <p>We opted for a square-shaped structure based on strong logical foundations. This structure serves as a prototype for space fabric, which is likewise square-shaped [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-32">
       32
      </xref>]. We have four chests parallel to the four bases of biological DNA. We also have four types of activation: electromagnetic wave, electromagnetic force, attraction, and repulsion. All of these activations have four fields: visibility, forcibility, fullness, and hollowness. We believe that nature is unitary and that everything starts with one, which converts into two opposite attributes. When these two multiply by two, we get four, and all four are opposites. An entity has two parts: quantum and sense. Quantum creates fullness and hollowness, while sense creates visibility and forcibility, and we arrive at four. Depending on entropy, this pattern continues with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, etc. Therefore, it is logical to assume a four-dimensional model of EPP.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5_3">
     <title>5.3. Four Chests</title>
     <p>The chests provide physical codes to cosmological fields to convert them into physically perceptible fields. After the interaction, the chests withdraw the codes, reconverting to cosmological fields (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
       Figure 6
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>a) The chest of fullness-visibility dyes (FV) imparts/acquires the physical codes to/from the data related to fullness and visibility.</p>
     <p>b) The chest of hollowness-visibility dyes (HV) imparts/acquires the physical codes to/from the data related to hollowness and visibility.</p>
     <fig id="fig6" position="float">
      <label>Figure 6</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 6. All existences (physical, biological, psychological, and intellectual) have a standard model. This model has four ports, four memory chambers, four code chests, and one interaction chamber. The model’s outer denotes the lower level of existence, and the inner denotes the higher level. This self-operative model uses space (capableness), time, and consciousness, which are the integral parts of existence.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId20.jpeg?20250924094123" />
     </fig>
     <p>c) The chest of fullness-forcibility dyes (FF) imparts/acquires the physical codes to/from the data related to fullness and forcibility.</p>
     <p>d) The chest of hollowness-forcibility dyes (HF) imparts/acquires the physical codes to/from the data related to hollowness and forcibility.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5_4">
     <title>5.4. Four Field Areas</title>
     <p>The four field areas are four junctions that receive different cosmological fields from the outside, from the memory chamber, obtain physical codes from chests, and deliver the coded data to the interaction chamber. Data are also received from the interaction chamber, yielding the physical codes, and sending the cosmological fields to memory chambers and the outside for emission. These field areas are 1) the visibility field area, 2) the forcibility field area, 3) the fullness field area, and 4) the hollowness field area.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5_5">
     <title>5.5. Interaction Chamber</title>
     <p>The interaction chamber is where the physically perceptible fields arrive from two different field areas, interact, and conduct an analysis for appropriate pairing. After pairing, an image is created, which remains alive for a minimum possible time (called the present). Subsequently, the image disintegrates, and the disintegrated perceptible fields move to the corresponding field areas. With regards to time, data moving inside is referred to as the future, data moving outside is the past, and the smallest available time when the image is created in between the future and the past is called the present.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5_6">
     <title>5.6. Memory Chambers</title>
     <p>We have physical images to memorize, but they are in cosmological format. These are disintegrated into four parts, each residing in its assigned memory chamber. As one image resides in four parts, it remains dormant. The “memory chamber” is the place where all the images are received, stored, and delivered to field areas. Whatever we receive from the outside is mixed with the data coming from the memory chambers. Hence, the resultant image is not pure, but highly deflected toward the data of memory chambers. Which image data will be delivered depends on the incoming fields and the entity’s desire. Hence, David and Emily stated that wishful seeing affects visual perception [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-33">
       33
      </xref>]. Marianna stated that “perception is often biased, selective, and malleable” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-34">
       34
      </xref>]. Aristotle argued, “…how perception leads to desire…” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-35">
       35
      </xref>]. The above examples are related to the intellectual entity. In the case of the physical world, we obtain a modulated (with information) magnetized electric field from the outside. After the interaction, the entity stores the information as magnetic imprints on the magnetic tape.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s6">
    <title>6. Creation of Activating Waves</title>
    <p>We have four cosmological substances; we call them primary fields or cosmological attributes. These attributes create different energy fields through different combinations and placements. The fields are responsible for four types of activations in the form of waves. Among these waves, two are moving waves, namely electromagnetic waves and the electromagnetic force carrying light and magnetic flux. The other two are stationary waves, such as sensorial exertive push and pull, creating repulsion and attraction, respectively. First, we discuss the creation of electromagnetic waves. Notably, the terms “positive” and “negative” are concerning the average space density of the space fabric.</p>
    <sec id="s6_1">
     <title>6.1. Creation of Electromagnetic Wave</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
       Figure 7
      </xref> shows that when an observer activates the hollowness, fullness, and visibility fields but does not activate the forcibility field, an electromagnetic wave is generated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-36">
       36
      </xref>]. If the forcibility field is absent, the empty forcibility field area is filled with a form of visibility that is opposite in aptitude and lower in space density. This is known as “negative visibility.” The “positive visibility” and “negative visibility”</p>
     <fig id="fig7" position="float">
      <label>Figure 7</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 7. The theory uses a unitary model of existence and explains the entity inflow (receiving), self-flow, and outflow (emission) of electromagnetic waves.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId21.jpeg?20250924094131" />
     </fig>
     <p>create “available visibility.” Similarly, “hollowness” and “fullness” create “quantum.” In the case of electromagnetic waves, the magnetic field is called the heat field or thermal radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-37">
       37
      </xref>].</p>
     <p>The wave is created under the following conditions:</p>
     <p>a) The fullness field area receives data from two sources: 1) the crest of the electric field from the outside and 2) preoccupied memories from FV and FF. The composition is called “cosmological available visibility of fullness.” After obtaining codes from the chests FV and FF, the data is converted into “Physically perceptible available visibility of fullness” and sent to the interaction chamber.</p>
     <p>b) Analogously, the hollowness field area receives data from two sources: 1) trough of the electric field from the outside and 2) preoccupied memories from HV and HF. The composition is referred to as “cosmological available visibility of hollowness.” After obtaining codes from the chests HV and HF, the data is converted into “physically perceptible available visibility of hollowness,” which is sent to the interaction chamber.</p>
     <p>c) The interaction chamber considers a logical pairing of “fullness” and “hollowness” and creates the future of the image called “physically available visibility of quantum (fullness-hollowness).”</p>
     <p>d) The future converts into the past, creating a “Physical quantum of available visibility” (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
       Figure 4
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>e) A physical image is created between the future and the past, which lies in the present.</p>
     <p>f) The “Physical quantum of available visibility” disintegrates and is converted into the “physically perceptible quantum of positive visibility” and “physically perceptible quantum of negative visibility.” Here, the “available visibility” disintegrates into “positive visibility” and “negative visibility.”</p>
     <p>g) The “physically perceptible quantum of positive visibility” goes to the visibility field area, where it surrenders its physical codes to the chests HV and FV, leaving with the “cosmological quantum of positive visibility.” The area sends these cosmological data to the memory chambers HV and FV, and a copy of these data is offered outside of the activating entity for emission as the crest of the magnetic field.</p>
     <p>h) Similarly, the “physically perceptible quantum of negative visibility” moves to the forcibility field area, where it surrenders its physical codes to the chests FF and HF, leaving with the “cosmological quantum of negative visibility.” The area sends these cosmological data to the memory chambers FF and HF, and a copy is offered outside of the entity for emission as the trough of the magnetic field.</p>
     <p>i) The emitted crest and trough create the magnetic field, offering an image to another observer.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s6_2">
     <title>6.2. Creation of Electromagnetic Force</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
       Figure 8
      </xref> shows that when an observer activates the hollowness, fullness, and forcibility fields but does not activate the visibility field, an electromagnetic force is generated. If the visibility field is absent, the empty visibility field area is filled with a form of forcibility that is opposite in aptitude and lower in space density. We refer to it as “negative forcibility.” The “positive forcibility” and “negative forcibility” create “available forcibility.” Similarly, “hollowness” and “fullness” create “quantum.” Considering the creation of electromagnetic force, according to the unitary logic, the process is parallel to the process of electromagnetic waves, where the words “visibility” and “forcibility” are inter-replaced.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s6_3">
     <title>6.3. Creation of Sensorial Exertive Push (Repulsion)</title>
     <p>We have two stationary sense waves, known as the sensorial exertive push (repulsion) and sensorial exertive pull (attraction).</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
       Figure 9
      </xref> shows that when an observer activates its own fullness, forcibility, and visibility fields, but does not activate the hollowness field, a “sensorial exertive push” or repulsion wave is generated. Without the hollowness field, the empty hollowness field area is filled with a form of fullness that is opposite in aptitude and less dense in space. We refer to it as “negative fullness.” The “positive fullness” and “negative fullness” create “available fullness.” In the same way, “visibility” and “forcibility” create “sensing.” The entity plays the game of repulsion is described under:</p>
     <p>a) The visibility field area receives data from two sources: 1) the crest of the sensorial field from outside and 2) preoccupied memories from HV and FV. The composition is referred to as “cosmological</p>
     <fig id="fig8" position="float">
      <label>Figure 8</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 8. The theory uses a unitary model of existence and explains the entity inflow (receiving), self-flow, and outflow (emission) of electromagnetic force.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId22.jpeg?20250924094133" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig9" position="float">
      <label>Figure 9</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 9. The theory uses a unitary model of existence and explains how an entity receives a repulsion push.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId23.jpeg?20250924094133" />
     </fig>
     <p>available fullness of visibility.” After obtaining codes from the chests HV and FV, the data converts into “physically perceptible available fullness of visibility,” which is sent to the interaction chamber.</p>
     <p>b) Analogously, the forcibility field area receives data from two sources: 1) the trough of the sensorial field outside, and 2) preconceived memories from HF and FF. The composition is called “cosmological fullness quantum of forcibility.” After obtaining codes from the chests HF and FF, the data converts into “physical fullness quantum of forcibility,” which is sent to the interaction chamber.</p>
     <p>c) The interaction chamber considers a logical pairing of “visibility” and “forcibility” and creates the future of the thrust, namely the “physically available fullness of sense.”</p>
     <p>d) The future converts into the past, creating a “physical sense of available fullness” (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
       Figure 4
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>e) A physical thrust is created between the future and the past, which lies in the present. This thrust is called REPULSION.</p>
     <p>f) The “physical sense of available fullness” disintegrates and converts into a “physically perceptible sense of positive fullness” and a “physically perceptible sense of negative fullness.” Here, the “available fullness” disintegrates into “positive fullness” and “negative fullness.”</p>
     <p>g) The “physical sense of positive fullness” moves to the fullness field area, where it surrenders its physical codes to the chests FV and FF, leaving with a “cosmological sense of positive fullness.” The area sends these cosmological data to the memory chambers FV and FF, and a copy is offered for emission as the crest of the exertion field.</p>
     <p>h) Analogously, the “physically perceptible sense of negative fullness” goes to the hollowness field area, where it surrenders its physical codes to the chests HV and HF, leaving with a “cosmological sense of negative fullness.” The area sends these cosmological data to the memory chambers HV and HF and is offered for emission as the trough of the exertion field.</p>
     <p>i) The crest and the trough of the emission create an exertion field available outside to another entity.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s6_4">
     <title>6.4. Creation of Sensorial Exertive Pull (Attraction)</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
       Figure 10
      </xref> shows that when an observer activates its hollowness, forcibility, and visibility fields, but does not activate the fullness field, a “sensorial exertive pull (attraction)” is generated. If the fullness field is absent, the empty fullness field area is filled with a form of hollowness that is opposite in aptitude and lower in space density. We will refer to it as “negative hollowness.” The “positive hollowness” and “negative hollowness” create “available hollowness.” Meanwhile, “visibility” and “forcibility” create “sensing.” Concerning the creation of sensorial exertive pull (attraction), according to the unitary logic, the process is parallel to that of sensorial exertive push (repulsion), where the words “fullness” and “hollowness” are inter-replaced.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s7">
    <title>7. Additional achievements</title>
    <sec id="s7_1">
     <title>7.1. Unification of All Activations</title>
     <p>Nature keeps things in balance, creating two types of activations: the flowing and the stationary wave. Flowing waves are electromagnetic waves and electromagnetic force, transporting quantum of light, and magnetic flux; both are opposite in aptitude. Stationary waves are sensorial exertive push and sensorial exertive pull, transferring a sense of repulsion and attraction; both are opposite in aptitude. Even though all activations are opposite to one another, they follow the same rules while evolving, as previously explained. The “fullness” is quantum with no desire, whereas “hollowness” is desire with no quantum. “Visibility” provides diversity with no intensity, whereas “forcibility” provides intensity with no diversity. All compensate each other, and we obtain a unit at last. All create an intensified diversity of the desired quantum; creating a unit image.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s7_2">
     <title>7.2. Simultaneous Existence of Electric and Magnetitic Field</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
       Figure 4
      </xref> indicates that all waves have two ends: emission and reception. Emission is made of magnetic</p>
     <fig id="fig10" position="float">
      <label>Figure 10</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 10. The theory uses a unitary model of existence and explains how an entity receives an attraction pull.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8303651-rId24.jpeg?20250924094140" />
     </fig>
     <p>and exertion fields, which may be referred to as “outgoing fields,” dipolar and spherically expanding fields. Meanwhile, the reception is made of electric and sensorial fields, which may be called “incoming fields,” monopolar and linear expanding fields. These facts propound that 1) the spherical and the linear field cannot run simultaneously and 2) the receiver collects the liner field from emitter who is offering spherical field. Therefore, both the electric field and magnetic field cannot run simultaneously. A physical object receives the magnetic fields by converting them to an electric field, absorbing them, and re-emitting them in the form of magnetic field fields. The same rule applies to stationary waves (repulsion and attraction). Dr. Baird stated: “Every time you change a magnetic field, you create an electric field. This is called Faraday’s Law of Induction” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-38">
       38
      </xref>]. Maxwell stated: “Electric and magnetic fields are two manifestations of the same phenomenon” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-39">
       39
      </xref>]. Hence, this proves that both phenomena cannot exist simultaneously.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s7_3">
     <title>7.3. Cosmic Microwave Background, Hidden Magnetic Field, Dark Energy, And Dark Matter</title>
     <p>The theory propounds that it is the receiver who creates all activations alone. If no emitter exists, only the required field is available on the space fabric, and activation will occur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-16">
       16
      </xref>]. The space fabric can have extra substances of visibility, forcibility, fullness, and hollowness, which can cause the activation of electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic force, repulsion, and attraction. During these activations, the entity perceives CMB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-40">
       40
      </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-41">
       41
      </xref>], hidden magnetic field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-42">
       42
      </xref>], dark energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-42">
       42
      </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-43">
       43
      </xref>], and dark matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-44">
       44
      </xref>], respectively.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s7_4">
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-"></xref>7.4. Formulation of Repulsion Push</title>
     <p>The theory further states that 1) Electromagnetic waves transport visibility (light) from more heated to less heated objects. 2) The electromagnetic force transports forcibility (charge field) from more charged to less charged objects. 3) Sensorial exertive push (repulsion) is created in between charged and heated objects. 4) Sensorial exertive pull (attraction) is created between charge-less and heat-less objects. We predict that there is no place or object possible in a world with zero possible heat or charge. Flip Tanedo stated: “It’s sufficient for a particle to have the energy to have a meaningful sense of existence” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-13">
       13
      </xref>]. Therefore, the presence of a minimum energy is a requisite in all cases. Heat and charge represent diversity and intensity, respectively; hence, they must be multiplied while quantifying, and both must have positive values. Thus, the value of repulsion largely depends on charge and temperature. Crookes back in 1874 stated, “Temperature is a primary cause of repulsion” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-45">
       45
      </xref>] and Gamini Piyadasa stated, “This repulsion force is proportional to the temperature, which is a parameter of the thermal energy of the particle” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-3">
       3
      </xref>]. Therefore, the repulsion can be quantified as follows:</p>
     <p>
      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          Repulsion 
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            K 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            × 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               b 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               b 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            × 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             M 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             M 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msup> 
           <mi>
             R 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </math> (Equation 1)</p>
     <p>where K is a constant; M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>2</sub> are the masses of objects 1 and 2, respectively; a<sub>1</sub> and a<sub>2</sub> are the FV (emitability of diversity; heat) of objects 1 and 2, respectively; b<sub>1</sub> and b<sub>2</sub> are the respective FF (emitability of intensity; charge) of objects 1 and 2, and R is the distance between two objects. This is a proposed formula, which has never been proven experimentally. Regarding 1/R<sup>3</sup>, we consider two objects placed at opposite sides of the diameter of a closed sphere and apply Boyle’s gas law, which states that pressure is inversely proportional to the volume of a closed system (volume is proportional to the R<sup>3</sup>).</p>
     <p>Instead of R<sup>2</sup>, as in attraction, we have R<sup>3</sup> while quantifying repulsion. Thus, repulsion is more effective for micro distances, and gravitation is more effective for macro distances.</p>
     <p>There are several examples:</p>
     <p>1) The theory propounds that heat (FV) and charge (FF) repeals each other, therefore, the tails of comets where the ionized gas tail points away from the heated sun but not the non-ionized molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-46">
       46
      </xref>]. Please refer to Figure 6.</p>
     <p>2) Plasma can be ejected in the form of an arc from the sun’s surface, despite its strong gravitational force [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-47">
       47
      </xref>]. The arc of ejectment follows the magnetic wind [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-48">
       48
      </xref>], possibly due to the repulsion between the ionized gas and the heat of the sun’s surface.</p>
     <p>3) While rotating, the planets around the sun can achieve a stable equilibrium between centrifugal force, gravitation pull, and repulsion. The repulsion is attributed to the heat and charge of the sun. Whenever a planet attempts to fall toward the sun, repulsion increases rapidly compared to attraction, prohibiting the planet from going nearer to the sun.</p>
     <p>4) Schewe states that gravity at small scale remains a mystery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-49">
       49
      </xref>]. The nuclear force is strongly attractive between nucleons at distances of approximately 0.8 femtometers (fm, or 0.8 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>15</sup> meters), but it diminishes rapidly to insignificance at distances beyond about 2.5 fm. At distances less than 0.7 fm, the nuclear force becomes repulsive. As the repulsion is more significant at lower distances, it does not allow nucleons to be closer after a certain distance, and therefore, it determines the size of nuclei. It shows that the repulsion is more significant at lower distances.</p>
     <p>5) Given “vacuum energy,” which is the energy density of the space fabric, Baez asked, “Does this energy really exist? And if so, how much of it is there?” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-50">
       50
      </xref>]. When this space fabric is calculated based on the theory of countless virtual particles, it comes out to be 120 orders of magnitude larger than what we find calculating the expansion of the universe due to dark energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-51">
       51
      </xref>]. This is referred to as the mystery of the “cosmological constant,” which is still not resolved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129567-32">
       32
      </xref>]. The present theory suggests that the expansion is based on the effective heat and charge within dark energy only; however, our space fabric is made of a massive amount of dark energy and dark matter balancing each other. This amount is not considered while calculating the vacuum energy.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s8">
    <title>8. Conclusion</title>
    <p>The entire universe is evolved, structured, and operated based on a unitary law, which we call the universal theory of existence. The same unitary law applies to all the universe levels, namely the cosmological, physical, biological, psychological, and intellectual worlds. All entities of all levels are structured on a parallel model, explained in this paper. This model is capable of explaining all activations, such as electromagnetic waves (light), electromagnetic force (magnetic flux), sensorial exertive push (repulsion), and sensorial exertive pull (attraction) in a unitary process. The physical objects create the stationary waves, repulsion, and attraction, which are nothing but the crowdedness and emptiness of the space fabric. It is explained that the physical and cosmological worlds are different; hence, a new terminology must be used. We provide some basic terminology according to the attributes of these cosmological substances. This is the first study to disclose the cause and process of gravitation (attraction) and repulsion and resolve several unresolved mysteries of the cosmological world.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s9">
    <title>Acknowledgements</title>
    <p>I would like to thank Prof. Dayanand Bhargava for his suggestions in the field of philosophy. I also wish to extend my special thanks to Dr. Ravi Sharma (Apollo Achievement Award, NASA) and Dr. K R Soni (HOD Physics, MNIT, Jaipur) for their valuable scientific suggestions.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peacock, K.A. (2008) The Quantum Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Greenwood Press, Westport.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     López, C. (2020) De Broglie Waves. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6100. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gamini Piyadasa, C.K. (2020) Antigravity, an Answer to Nature’s Phenomena Including the Expansion of the Universe. Advances in High Energy Physics, 2020, Article ID: 9315491. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9315491
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2021) Structure of Space Fabric. Natural Science, 13, 477-490. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2021.1312041
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chang, Y.F. (2020) Development of Entropy Change in Philosophy of Science. Philosophy Study, 10, 517-524. &gt;https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2020.09.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2021) Philosophical Approach to Space Fabric and Propagation of Light. Natural Science, 13, 457-468. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2021.1310038
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Holguín, B. (2022) Thinking, Guessing, and Believing. Philosophers’ Imprint, 22, Article No. 6. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.2123
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2020) Psychological Model of Phonosemantics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 453-474. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09701-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kelly, T. (2016) Evidence. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edition. &gt;https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lewis, G. (2014) Where’s the Proof in Science? There Is None. The Conversation. &gt;https://theconversation.com/wheres-the-proof-in-science-there-is-none-30570 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lehrer, K. (1975) Reviews. Metaphilosophy, 6, 193-209. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1975.tb00247.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2021) An Alternative Approach toward the Origin of the Universe. Philosophy and Cosmology, 27, 5-21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/27/1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Madeleine, O. (2019) Massless Particles Can’t Be Stopped. Symmetry, Dimensions of Particle Physics. &gt;https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/massless-particles-cant-be-stopped 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rugh, S.E. and Zinkernagel, H. (2002) The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 33, 663-705. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00033-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nieh, H.T. (1972) Size of Photons. Physics Letters B, 38, 100-104. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(72)90750-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vasilev, G.S., Ljunggren, D. and Kuhn, A. (2010) Single Photons Made-to-Measure. New Journal of Physics, 12, Article ID: 063024. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/063024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     University of Bristol (2012) One Real Mystery of Quantum Mechanics: Physicists Devise New Experiment. &gt;https://phys.org/news/2012-11-real-mystery-quantum-mechanics-physicists.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Perkowitz, S. (2023) Bose-Einstein Condensate. Encyclopaedia Britannica. &gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/Bose-Einstein-condensate 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Geller, K.N. and Kollarits, R. (1972) Experiment to Measure the Increase in Electron Mass with Velocity. American Journal of Physics, 40, 1125-1130. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1986771
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cain, F. (2014) Does Light Experience Time? &gt;https://phys.org/news/2014-05-does-light-experience-time.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kwiat, P.G. and Hardy, L. (2000) The Mystery of the Quantum Cakes. American Journal of Physics, 68, 33-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19369
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barrow, J.D. (2002) Cosmology: A Matter of All and Nothing. Astronomy and Geophysics, 43, 4.8-4.15. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-4004.2002.43408.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     HSI Sensing Team (2017) How Does Temperature Affect Magnetism. HSI Sensing. &gt;https://hsisensing.com/temperature-affect-magnetism/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Robert, O. (1968) The Two-Slit Experiment and ‘One Mystery’ of Quantum Mechanics. The Information Philosopher. &gt;https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/experiments/two-slit_experiment 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2023) A Philosophical Approach toward Electromagnetic Wave Absorption. Natural Science, 15, 48-65. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2023.152005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Towell, G. (2020) What Are 3 Similarities between Magnets and Electricity? SCIENCING. &gt;https://sciencing.com/3-similarities-between-magnets-electricity-8105339.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     National Aeronautics and Space Administration,&amp;Science Mission Directorate (2010) Anatomy of an Electromagnetic Wave. NASA Science Website. &gt;http://science.nasa.gov/ems/02_anatomy 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sbitnev, V.I. and Fedi, M. (2017) Superfluid Quantum Space and Evolution of the Universe. In: Capistrano, A., Ed., Trends in Modern Cosmology, IntechOpen, London. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5772/68113
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Solà, J. (2013) Cosmological Constant and Vacuum Energy: Old and New Ideas. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 453, Article ID: 012015. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/453/1/012015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2022) Evolution and Structure of Elementary Physical Particles. Natural Science, 14, 328-342. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2022.148030
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2022) Nature of Existence and Essence of Time in Existence. Natural Science, 14, 203-216. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2022.145020
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adler, R.J., Casey, B. and Jacob, O.C. (1995) Vacuum Catastrophe: An Elementary Exposition of the Cosmological Constant Problem. American Journal of Physics, 63, 620-626. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17850
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dunning, D. and Balcetis, E. (2013) Wishful Seeing: How Preferences Shape Visual Perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 33-37. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412463693
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pogosyan (2019) Why We See What We Want to See. Psychology Today. &gt;https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/between-cultures/201907/why-we-see-what-we-want-see 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Charles, D. (2021) Perception, Desire, and Action: Inextricably Embodied Subjects. Oxford Academic, Oxford. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869566.003.0007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agrawal, P.K. (2019) Ancient Indian Philosophy and Modern Science. &gt;http://universaltheoryonline.com/category/books-published 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Britannica, T. (2022) Thermal Radiation. Encyclopedia Britannica. &gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/thermal-radiation 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baird, C.S. (2116) Is It Possible to Create Magnetic Waves? &gt;https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2016/01/13/is-it-possible-to-create-magnetic-waves/# 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ball, D.W. (2006) Field Guide to Spectroscopy. SPIE Press, Bellingham. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1117/3.682726
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Purdy, S.R. (2016) Spaces of Visibility and Identity. Undergraduate Honors Thesis, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dobrijevic, D. and Howell, E. (2022) What Is the Cosmic Microwave Background. &gt;https://www.space.com/33892-cosmic-microwave-background.html
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wolchover, N. (2020) The Hidden Magnetic Universe Begins to Come into View. &gt;https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-hidden-magnetic-universe-begins-to-come-into-view-20200702/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kastner, R.E. and Kauffman, S. (2018) Are Dark Energy and Dark Matter Different Aspects of the Same Physical Process? Frontiers in Physics, 6, Article 71. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00071
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ureña-López, L.A. (2019) Brief Review on Scalar Field Dark Matter Models. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, Article 438500. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2019.00047
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Crookes, W. (1875) Attraction and Repulsion Caused by Radiation. Nature, 12, 125. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/012125a0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Alexandersson, I. (2011) Comet Ion Tail Observations Far from the Nucleus. &gt;https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:406495/FULLTEXT02 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Webb, D.F. and Howard, T.A. (2012) Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, Article No. 3. &gt;https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2012-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, J. (2017) Physics of Erupting Solar Flux Ropes: Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs)—Recent Advances in Theory and Observation. Physics of Plasmas, 24, Article ID: 090501. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993929
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schewe, P.F. (2010) Gravity at Small Scales Remains a Mystery. Livestock Science. &gt;https://www.livescience.com/8789-gravity-small-scales-remains-mystery.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Beaz, J. (2011) What’s the Energy Density of the Vacuum? &gt;https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/vacuum.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.129567-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mann, A. (2021) What Is the Cosmological Constant? Livestock Science. &gt;https://www.livescience.com/cosmological-constant.html
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>