<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJPsych</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Psychiatry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7325</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojpsych.2023.135032</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJPsych-129439</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Cybersex Addiction in Benin Schools (2023)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ataigba</surname><given-names>Ireti Nethania Elie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Soumaoro</surname><given-names>Kemo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koivogui</surname><given-names>David Sinet</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayena</surname><given-names>Fidèle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moussa</surname><given-names>Djibrilla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ousseyni</surname><given-names>Zika Oumou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djossou</surname><given-names>Sègnon Eurydice Elvire</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tokpanoude</surname><given-names>Coovi Nonwanou Ignace</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sourabie</surname><given-names>Oumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djidonou</surname><given-names>Anselme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tognon</surname><given-names>Tchegnonsi Francis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gandaho</surname><given-names>Prosper</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ezin</surname><given-names>Houngbe Josiane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Service de Psychiatrie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sour&amp;amp;#244; Sanou, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Service de Psychiatrie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Départemental du Borgou Alibori, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff8"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Unité de Santé Publique, Cotonou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculté de Médecine &amp;amp; Institut de Formation en Soins Infirmiers et Obstétricaux, Université de Parakou, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, Niamey, Niger</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Santé, Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Université André Salifou de Zinder, Zinder, Niger</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>438</fpage><lpage>460</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: 
  The development of digital technology over the last few decades has facilitated access to websites and videos in the field of sexuality, eliminating many of the boundaries that were restrictive for some and protective for others. While this evolution has favored better information sharing, it has also precipitated the emergence of an entirely new phenomenon: cybersexuality. <b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate addiction to cybersexuality in schools in the city of Parakou in 2023. <b>Methods:</b> Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in general, technical and vocational secondary schools in Parakou, northern Benin, from December 2022 to September 2023. A self-administered questionnaire integrating the “short Internet sex Addiction Test” (s-IATsex) scale was used to assess cybersexuality. <b>Results:</b> A total of 482 students participated in the study. The prevalence of problematic use of cybersexuality in Parakou schools was 11.4% according to the s-IATsex (Short Internet sex Addiction Test) scale. The average age of the students was 16.99 &#177; 2.16 years, with extremes of 11 and 30 years. The majority were in secondary school (67.8%). Factors associated with addiction to cybersexuality were: place of residence (OR = 0.164; p = 0.017), external genitalia discharge (OR = 5.37; p = 0.049), sexual partner (OR = 2.53; p = 0.010), access to pornographic sites (OR = 7.96; p &lt; 0.001), anxiety (OR = 3.86; p = 0.001) and depression (OR = 2.75; p = 0.018). <b>Conclusion:</b> Approximately one pupil in 10 is addicted to cybersexuality at school in the town of Parakou/Parakou city, Benin. The multiple consequences of this addiction call for effective preventive actions aimed at vulnerable groups of pupils.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cybersex</kwd><kwd> Addiction</kwd><kwd> Students</kwd><kwd> Benin</kwd><kwd> 2023</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cybersexuality is defined as the use of sexual material (visual, auditory or written) obtained from internet for sexual stimulation, arousal or satisfaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref1">1</xref>] . Looking for sensational things, people shift from simple usage to intense, repetitive and persistent practice of cybersexuality. Thus, usage becomes problematic. Addiction to cybersex is the dependence on a variety of digital practices such as watching pornographic or erotic material, taking part in sexual chats, participating in or watching webcam sex practices, searching online for partners for offline sex, or seeking information or advice about sexuality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref2">2</xref>] . A distinction is made between two forms of cybersex addiction, according to which addiction occurs: passive cybersex addiction and active cybersex addiction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Several prevalence studies have been carried out on this subject, particularly in school and student environments. One of these studies reported a prevalence of 4.2% in Germany [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref4">4</xref>] . The risk of addiction varies in different studies: 8.7% in Tunisia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref5">5</xref>] ; 10.3% in the USA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Teenagers and young people are more exposed to these practices, which can have harmful consequences on various areas of their lives. On the somatic level, sexually transmitted infections favored by the multiplication of offline sexual partners and risk-taking, as well as sexual dysfunction and libido disorders, have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref7">7</xref>] . At school, the impact of cybersex addiction can be a memory impairment with concentration difficulties, leading to a reduction of the academic performance. In the social sphere, isolation, relational difficulties with a multiplicity of sexual partners, and the precocity and frequency of sexual intercourse have all been reported; on the other hand, the desire to reproduce what is viewed leads to rape, dating violence and risk-taking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref4">4</xref>] . On the psychiatric one, disorders such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse and suicide attempts are all mentioned. Then, the act of masturbation that often accompanies cybersexuality and which is perceived as a sin in the spiritual realm can generate guilty likely to become morbid. Many other adverse effects on family relationships have been also reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref8">8</xref>] . However, to date, no specific pharmacological therapy has been codified for the management of problematic cybersex use. But, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, anxiolytics and anti-androgens have been tried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref2">2</xref>] . Cognitive-behavioural therapy remains the most recommended and by far the most widely used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref2">2</xref>] . In France for instance, there are groups called D&#233;pendants Affectifs et Sexuels Anonymes (D.A.S.A.). Nonetheless, the best treatment for this disease, which blights the youth ethic, is prevention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>In view of the many consequences of problematic use of cybersex addiction, a study of its prevalence and associated factors, especially in schools, would seem judicious in order to provide statistical data in the socio-cultural context of Benin. That’s why this study, whose aim was to investigate the problematic use of cybersexuality in the school environment in the town of Parakou, was initiated in 2022-2023 as part of an end-of-training thesis in basic medical studies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Population and Procedures</title><p>This study focused on public and private schools in the town of Parakou, in the north-east of Benin Republic. The study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical study conducted from December 2022 to September 2023, with data collection from May 01 to July 01, 2023. The study population consisted of all students attending general, technical or vocational secondary schools in the city of Parakou for the 2022-2023 academic year. The sampling technique was a non- proportional stratified sampling combined with a simple random draw to include 482 students from secondary schools in the city of Parakou.</p><p>1<sup>st</sup> level: random selection of establishments</p><p>Initially, two strata were created. One was a list of all public schools, and the other was a list of private, technical schools in the commune of Parakou. The name of each school was written on a piece of paper, and a random selection of 5 schools per stratum was made. The list of schools surveyed was then transcribed onto paper.</p><p>2<sup>nd</sup> stage: class selection and choice of students surveyed</p><p>Once in a school, a numbered list of all classes was drawn up by module. A simple random draw was used to select one class per module. The next step was to select around ten students per class.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Measure</title><p>Data collection was done by a questionnaire collecting information on sociodemographic characteristics, background, biography, social survey, personality and sexual practices and behaviors. The dependent variable was the problematic use of cybersexuality which was assessed using the test proposed by Pawlikowski et al.: the s-IATsex scale. The HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression) scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref9">9</xref>] was used to screen for anxiety and depression among the respondents. A subjacent borderline personality was explored with the Borderline Personality Assessment Scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>&#183; Short Internet sex Addiction Test (s-IATsex) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref11">11</xref>]</p><p>The short Internet sex Addiction Test (s-IATsex) is a questionnaire designed by Brand, Pawlikowski et al. in 2013, modified and adapted to cybersex from the Internet Addiction Test scale by K. Young (1998), in which the terms “online” or “internet” have been replaced by “online sexual activities” and “internet sex sites”. It is used to assess cybersex addiction. The scale comprises 12 items to be rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (rarely) to 5 (always), and incorporates the following dimensions: loss of control, time devoted to the activity, craving and social problems linked to the activity. Initially in English, it was translated and validated in French in 2016 by W&#233;ry et al. Scores range from 12 to 60. Psychometric qualities are satisfactory, with an alpha Cronbach = 0.87. The final score is obtained by summing the results on the Likert scale. A score above 30 is suggestive of an addiction to cybersexuality.</p><p>&#183; Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref11">11</xref>]</p><p>The HAD scale is a screening instrument for anxiety and depressive disorders. It comprises 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and the other seven to depression (total D), giving two scores (maximum score for each = 21).</p><p>To screen for anxiety and depressive symptoms, the following interpretation can be proposed for each of the scores (A and D):</p><p>- 7 or less: no symptoms</p><p>- 8 to 10: doubtful symptomatology</p><p>- 11 and over: definite symptomatology.</p><p>&#183; Borderline personality assessment scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref10">10</xref>]</p><p>The Personal Borderline Questionnaire (PBQ) is an instrument for assessing borderline personality. Adapted from DSM 5 criteria, it comprises 10 items rated from 1 to 2. The sum of response points gives a score, the interpretation of which has set a threshold score above 12 as being suggestive of Borderline personality.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 software. To compare the difference between the study's dependent and independent variables, Pearson's Chi&#178; test was used when the numbers were greater than five (05), and Fisher’s exact test when one of the expected numbers was less than or equal to five (05). The association between the variables studied and the dependent variable was determined by the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI95%). The association between two variables was established for a p-value &lt; 0.05 (5% significance level). The logistic regression model was also used to assess the influence of the various independent variables on the dependent variable.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Prevalence of Cybersex Addiction</title><p>Among the 482 students who took part in the study, the prevalence of problematic use of cybersex in schools in Parakou was 11.4% according to the s-IATsex (Short Internet sex Addiction Test) scale.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Socio-Demographic and Economic Characteristics of the Study Population</title><p>The average age of the students was 16.99 &#177; 2.16, with extremes of 11 and 30. The majority were in secondary school (67.8%), and 405 (84.0%) were financially dependent on their families.</p><p>Of the 55 students (11.4%) presenting a problematic use of online sexual practices, males dominated (65.45%). The 16 - 18 age group (56.4%) was more represented (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of students by socio-demographic and economic characteristics (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample (n = 482)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (n = 427)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (n = 55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 15 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 (25.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114 (26.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (12.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 18 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >258 (53.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227 (53.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (56.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 - 25 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 (21.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 (19.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (30.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;25 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (00.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (00.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (00.0%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Man</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245 (50.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209 (48.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (65.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237 (49.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218 (51.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (34.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Place of residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >381 (79.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >328 (76.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (96.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (21.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99 (23.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (02.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lifestyle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With family</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >327 (67.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >294 (68.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (60.0%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With single father</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (01.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (01.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (01.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With single mother</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (09.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (09.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (09.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (03.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (02.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (09.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With aunt/uncle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (09.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (09.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (07.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (08.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (08.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (12.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Existence of a source of income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413 (85.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >362 (84.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (92.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69 (14.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 (15.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (07.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Family financial dependence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405 (84.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354 (82.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (92.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77 (16.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (17.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (07.3%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Characteristics Relating to History and Previous Treatment</title><p>Of the subjects surveyed, 23 of them (41.8%) had a history of sexually transmitted infection. These conditions had various manifestations within the group: hot piss (gonorrhea) in 09 subjects (7.4%), scratching of the external genitalia in 22 subjects (18.0%), discharge from the external genitalia in 14 subjects (11.5%) and lesions of the external genitalia in 06 subjects (4.9%). Among male students, 40 ones (16.3%) suffered from sexual dysfunction or premature ejaculation. Then, the proportions of students regularly consuming alcohol, tobacco and drugs were 56.6%, 26.0% and 3.3% respectively in the study population. The use of any of these psychoactive substances was directly related to sexual activity for 05 (01.0%) respondents. It should be noted that 06 (1.2%) of these surveyed students had already answered in courts for an act related to cybersexuality.</p><p>Lastly, 27 (5.6%) of the students surveyed were taking conventional or traditional medical treatment for a problem related to sexuality; thus, the use of certain ointments and medicines (called “bazouka”) as bitter cola and/or ginger was mentioned.</p><p>Of those with a cybersex addiction, 49 of them (88.8%) had developed a sexually transmitted infection, while 14 (38.9%) males suffered from sexual dysfunction or premature ejaculation. Consumption of alcohol, tobacco and drugs accounted for 65.5%, 56.3% and 14.5% respectively. In connection with cybersexuality, 01 (1.8%) of the students had legal problems. Finally, 03 students (5.5%) in the same group were taking conventional or traditional medical treatment for their sexuality (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Biography</title><p>Among those with a cybersex addiction, 65.5% had parents with married status. More than seven out of ten (74.5%) had never discussed sexuality with their parents. Almost all of the students (96.4%) had gone through puberty, and 58.2% had sexual partners and experience of sexual intercourse (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Passive Cybersexuality: Pornography</title><p>In the sample, more than one in four (36.7%) regularly or almost always visited web sites producing pornographic videos. The videos were used for sexual stimulation by 13.9% of students, while 13.3% watched them for masturbatory purposes. Similarly, one in ten (10.2%) were subscribers or members of various pornographic social networking groups, and 50.7% said that they had an irresistible urge to view pornographic material to stimulate their libido.</p><p>Among students with a cybersex addiction, more than eight out of ten (81.8%) regularly or almost regularly visited web sites producing pornographic videos. While 30.9% used these videos for sexual stimulation, 30.7% of cybersex addicts watched these videos for masturbatory purposes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The information given by the results of this survey on the different types of videos reveals that those who prefer heterosexual videos (126 subjects or 72%) of young adults (106 subjects or 60.57%) were the most numerous. A subject in this survey is likely to have one or more preferences with regard to these videos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of students surveyed according to their antecedents and previous treatments (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample (n = 482)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (n = 427)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (n = 55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >History of sexually transmitted infections</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119 (24.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96 (22.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >363 (75.31%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331 (77.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Type of sexually transmitted infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot piss</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (07.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (00.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (18.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex scraping</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (18.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (03.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (25.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (11.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (00.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (03.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex lesion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (00.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (07.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sexual dysfunction/Premature ejaculation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (07.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (05.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (21.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >448 (92.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405 (94.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (78.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alcohol consumption</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273 (56.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237 (55.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (65.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209 (43.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190 (44.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (34.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tobacco consumption</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (26%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (3.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (56.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71 (74%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (15%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (43.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Use of other psychoactive substances</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (3.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (1.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (14.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >466 (96.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >419 (98.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (85.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Existence of a relationship between substance use and sexuality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (0.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477 (99%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442 (103.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (63.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Judicial history related to cybersexuality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (1.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (0.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (3.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >476 (98.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >423 (99.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (96.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Conventional or traditional treatment related to sexuality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (5.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (5.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >455 (94.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >403 (94.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (94.5%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by biography (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample (n = 482)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (n = 427)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (n = 53)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Living parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >462 (95.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409 (95.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (96.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (4.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (4.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (3.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parents’ marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >369 (76.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >333 (78.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (65.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Separated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (03.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (03.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (3.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (08.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (08.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (14.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Remarried</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (01.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (01.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (00.0%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widowed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 (09.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (08.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (16.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status of respondent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320 (66.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288 (67.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.18%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >In couple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162 (33.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139 (32.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.82%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nature of relationship with parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >421 (87.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >381 (89.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (72.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conflictual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (05.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (03.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (18.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (01.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (01.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (01.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overprotective</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (05.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (05.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (07.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sexuality discussed with parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193 (40%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179 (41.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (25.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289 (60%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248 (58.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (74.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neglected by parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 (15.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 (14.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (25.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408 (84.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >367 (85.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (74.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Puberty</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408 (84.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355 (83.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (96.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 (15.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 (16.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (03.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Existence of a sexual partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176 (36.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144 (33.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >306 (63.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283 (66.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> sexual experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152 (31.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 (28.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330 (68.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307 (71.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.8%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Experience of non-consensual sex</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (06.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (04.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (18.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >453 (94.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408 (95.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (81.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nature of relationship with partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (4.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (03.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (10.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134 (27.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106 (24.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (50.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >326 (67.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305 (71.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (38.2%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Active cybersexuality</p><p>- Sexting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>)</p><p>Overall, 30.7% of students surveyed have received nude photos from strangers (18.9%), friends (7.9%) and boy/girlfriends (7.5%). At the same time, 8.9% of students sent their nude photos to boyfriends (5.2%) and girlfriends (3.1%). Once they had received the nude photos, only 1.2% of students were able to</p><p>discuss the subject with an older person, while 3.8% forwarded them or showed them to close friends. The images sent are often the object of a ruse; 6.6% of sexting students were able to use the photos received to blackmail their owners, respectively because the relationship was over (5.4%), out of jealousy (2.3%) and others to upset the person concerned or under pressure from friends.</p><p>Among students who send their intimate photos to others, 4.4% have been victims of blackmail and 2.3% have been victims of sextortion; the intimate content of messages sent has been transferred without their consent to others or published on social networks. 7.4% of these students expressed regret having sent intimate photos online to others. For the rest, it’s a way to live a normal love relationship.</p><p>Among students with a problematic use of cybersex, 67.3% have received nude photos or videos and 34.5% have sent them. Of these, 12.7% had blackmailed the photo senders, and 16.4% had been blackmailed because of the photos they had sent.</p><p>- D&#233;dipix, skin parties and dating sites</p><p>Nearly three out of ten (28.2%) of the students surveyed were aware of d&#233;dipix, and 5% of them practiced it. Skin parties, on the other hand, were known from 35.1% of the students surveyed and practiced by 21.2%. They were involved in the camaraderie of drinking establishments (11.2%), various drugs (weed, cocaine) and other substances such as sildenafil. In fact, 30.5% of students were aware of sexual or dating websites. 15.1% had accounts with pseudonyms, and 14.5% had relationships on these sites. It emerges that 4.3% of students had been able to have physical sexual relations with people initially known on a dating site.</p><p>In the group of students with an addiction to cybersexuality, 63.6% knew about dedipix, and 16.4% of them practiced it. Similarly, 61.8% of students with a cybersex addiction were aware of skin parties, and 41.8% practiced them regularly. While 70.9% are aware of online dating sites, 38.2% have created accounts on these sites, and 32.7% are involved in online sexual relationships. It should be noted that 23.6% of students with a cybersex addiction have had physical sexual relations with people they have met on dating sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Characteristics Relating to the Personality and Psychic Disorders Involved</title><p>In the present study, borderline personality was present in 56.4% of people with problematic cybersex use. More than half (55.6%) had difficulty concentrating, and around six out of ten (58.2%) had low self-esteem. Eighteen people (32.7%)</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of students surveyed according to characteristics related to D&#233;dipix, Skin parties and online sexual and/or romantic encounters (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample (N = 482)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (n = 427)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (n = 55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge of D&#233;dipix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136 (28.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (23.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (63.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346 (71.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >326 (76.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (36.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Practical experience of D&#233;dipix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (3.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09 (16.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >458 (95.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412 (96.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (83.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skin party experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169 (35.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135 (31.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (61.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313 (64.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292 (68.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (38.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skin party practice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 (21.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79 (18.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380 (78.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348 (81.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Knowledge of sex and/or love websites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147 (30.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 (25.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (70.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >339 (69.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323 (75.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (29.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Account on a dating site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (15.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (12.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (38.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409 (94.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375 (87.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (61.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sexual/love relationship on a dating site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (14.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (12.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (32.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412 (95.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375 (87.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (67.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Physical sexual relationship with partner met on a website</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (4.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07 (1.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (23.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >443 (95.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401 (93.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (76.4%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>had failed at school, 16 people (29.1%) had anxiety and 6 people (10.9%) had depression (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Statistical relationships in bivariate analysis</p><p>In bivariate analysis, several factors showed a statistically significant association with problematic use of cybersex use. These included the following variables: gender (p = 0.021), age (p = 0.038), erectile dysfunction or presence of premature ejaculation (p &lt; 0.001), external genital discharge (p &lt; 0.001), history of anxiety (p = 0.001), history of depression (p = 0.010), tobacco use (p = 0.003), use of cannabis and other drugs (p &lt; 0.001), nature of relationship with parents (p &lt; 0.001), parental abandonment (p = 0.027), discussions of sexuality with parents (p = 0.019), puberty (p = 0.010), experience of first sexual intercourse (p &lt; 0.001), the nature of the relationship with the partner (p &lt; 0.001), frequent stimulation of the libido with pornographic images/videos (p &lt; 0.001), consensual sexual intercourse (p &lt; 0.001), access to dating sites (p &lt; 0.001), access to pornographic websites (p &lt; 0.001), exchange of sexual photos or videos (p &lt; 0.001), Borderline personality (p = 0.012), membership of a pornographic publishing group (p &lt; 0.001), sexual violence (p &lt; 0.001), difficulty concentrating (p &lt; 0.001), difficulty having pleasure around oneself (p &lt; 0.001), low self-esteem (p &lt; 0.001), satisfaction with physical sex (p &lt; 0.001), academic failure (p &lt; 0.001), anxiety (p &lt; 0.001) and depression (p &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>Multivariate analysis of factors associated with addiction to cybersexuality</p><p>In multivariate analysis, a significant association was found between addiction to cybersexuality and the following variables: place of residence (OR = 0.164; p = 0.017), external genitalia discharge (OR = 5.37; p = 0.049), having a sexual partner (OR = 2.53; p = 0.010), access to pornographic sites (OR = 7.96; p &lt; 0.001), anxiety (OR = 3.86; p = 0.001) and depression (OR = 2.75; p = 0.018) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Study limitations</p><p>In order to achieve the objectives, set out in this work, a descriptive cross- sectional study with analytical aims was carried out. It identified students in secondary schools in the town of Parakou who use cybersex and those with problematic use of cybersex, calculated their prevalence, described their socio-demographic characteristics and the repercussions of problematic use of cybersex. It also provided primary data and a comprehensive database on problematic use of cybersex. The results obtained are valid and can be the subject of etiological hypotheses that could lead to an analytical study to identify the factors associated with problematic use of cybersexuality, in order to undertake corrective actions.</p><p>Non-proportional stratified sampling combined with simple random sampling was the sampling technique adopted in this study. The statistical unit was any student matching our inclusion criteria. The sampling frame consisted of the list of 13 public and 20 private secondary schools and technical and vocational</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to social survey data (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample (N = 482)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (n = 427)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (n = 55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Borderline personality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196 (40.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165 (38.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (56.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286 (59.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262 (61.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (43.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Member of a pornographic publishing group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (10.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (6.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >433 (89.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401 (93.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Frequent stimulation of libido with pornographic images/videos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163 (33.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 (28.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (78.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319 (66.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307 (71.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (21.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sexual violence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (7.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (5.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (25.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420 (87.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382 (89.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (74.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Difficulty concentrating</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83 (17.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (12.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (55.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >369 (76.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345 (80.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (44.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Difficulty having fun around others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78 (16.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (13.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (40%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404 (83.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371 (86.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (60%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Low self-esteem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 (29%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 (25.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342 (71%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319 (74.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (41.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Satisfaction with physical sexual intercourse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (17.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (17%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (47.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >329 (68.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302 (83%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (52.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >School failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (10.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (9.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (32.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430 (89.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >385 (90.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (81.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anxiety</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Certain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57 (11.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (9.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (29.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139 (28.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115 (26.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (43.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286 (59.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271 (63.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (27.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Definite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (2.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (1.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (10.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (11.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (8.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (30.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414 (85.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382 (89.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (58.2%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="6"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Presentation of variables with a statistically significant association in bivariate analysis with addiction to cybersexuality among students surveyed (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table-wrap id="6_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-square</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (3.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218 (45.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (7.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209 (43.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 15 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (1.45%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114 (23.65%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 18 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (6.43%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227 (47.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.526</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 - 25 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (3.53%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (17.84%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (2.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (5.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (8.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401 (83.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >External genital discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (8.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (3.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (13.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 (74.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >History of anxiety</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (4.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78 (16.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349 (72.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >History of depression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115 (23.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6.625</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (6.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >312 (64.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Tobacco use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (9.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (16.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >9.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (7.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (66.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Use of cannabis and other psychoactive substances</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (1.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (1.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >24.379</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (9.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >419 (86.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Nature of relationship with parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (8.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >381 (79%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >22.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overprotective</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (0.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conflictual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (2.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (3.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (1.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Parental abandonment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (2.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 (12.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >41 (8.5%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >367 (76.1%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Discuss sexuality with parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (2.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179 (37.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5.502</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.019</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (8.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248 (51.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Puberty</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (11%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355 (73.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6.558</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (0.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 (14.9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Existence of a sexual partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (6.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144 (29.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283 (58.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Nature of relationship with partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (4.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305 (63.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >25.364</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (5.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106 (21,9%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (1.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (3.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Frequent stimulation of libido with pornographic images/videos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (8.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 (24.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >54.597</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (2.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307 (63.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Experience of 1st sexual intercourse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (6.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 (24.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307 (63.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Experience of non-consensual sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (2.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (3.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (9.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408 (84.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Access to dating sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (2.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (4.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.518</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (9.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400 (84.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Access to pornographic sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (5.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (6.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397 (83.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Exchange of photos or videos of a sexual nature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (8.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218 (45.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.442</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (2.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209 (43.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Borderline personality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (6.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165 (34.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.342</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262 (54.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Membership of a pornographic publishing group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (5.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (6.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401 (83.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Sexual violence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (2.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (8.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382 (83.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.449</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Difficulty concentrating</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (6.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (11.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345 (76.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Difficulty having fun around others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (4.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (11.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (6.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371 (77%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.965</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Low self-esteem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (6.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 (22.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319 (66.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Satisfaction with physical sexual intercourse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (12.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (5.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302 (62.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >School failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (3.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (3.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (7.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >368 (76.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anxiety</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Certain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (3.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (8.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115 (23.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Definite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (1.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (1.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (3.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (7.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.759</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>training establishments in the city of Parakou. A random selection of 10 schools (5 public and 5 private) was made. The minimum number of students to be surveyed was estimated at 300 in all establishments. In the end, this study covered 482 secondary school pupils. This made it possible to take into account a wide range of respondents during the study period. The methodology used was therefore reliable. To carry out the study, permission to collect data in the schools was obtained from the departmental directorate of secondary education, technical and vocational training in Borgou and Alibori, from the departmental directorate of health in Borgou and from the parents of the pupils surveyed.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Associated Factors with addiction to cybersexuality in multivariate analysis (Parakou, 2023)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Addiction to cybersexuality</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >IC95%</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OR</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Place of residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >328 (68.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >53 (11.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99 (20.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2 (00.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 - 0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >External genital discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (4.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4 (3.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.371</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 - 28.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (13.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >91 (74.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Existence of a sexual partner</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (6.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >179 (37.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.534</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25 - 5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >248 (51.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Access to pornographic sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135 (28.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >23 (4.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.968</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21 - 19.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; 0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (6.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >397 (82.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anxiety</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Definite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (3.31%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >41 (8.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.863</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74 - 8.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (4.98%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >115 (23.88%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (3.11%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >271 (56.22%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Definite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (1.24%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7 (1.45%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19 - 6.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (3.52%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >38 (7.88%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (6.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >382 (79.25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The data was collected via a digital questionnaire on smartphones. The questionnaire is individual and is addressed to eligible subjects, containing a variety of information including the evaluation items of the short Internet Addiction sex Test (s-IATsex). It was designed by Brand, Pawlikowski et al. in 2013, modified and adapted to cybersex from K. Young’s (1998) IAT scale, in which the terms “online” or “internet” were replaced by “online sexual activities” and “internet sex sites”. Initially in English, it was translated into French and validated in 2016 by W&#233;ry et al. Respondents were assured of the confidentiality of the information gathered. This may lead to a relative reliability of the results.</p><p>Given the sensitivity of the subject, and the susceptibility of sexuality issues to socio-cultural context, no study can be free from the risk of bias. In the present study, there are still biases linked to the source of the information, which could minimize or exaggerate certain aspects of the statements. Shyness and social desirability could also be a source of bias. However, this in no way alters the quality of the results obtained.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Prevalence of Cybersex Addiction</title><p>Of the 482 targets surveyed, 55 showed problematic use of cybersex. This represents a calculated prevalence of 11.4%.</p><p>Several other authors have reported a similar prevalence. These include Vipin K et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref12">12</xref>] in India in 2022, who found a prevalence of 11% in a population of medical students, R. Ballester et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] (10.8%) in a population of Spanish teenagers in 2015, Giordano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref6">6</xref>] who found a prevalence of 10.3% in a population of schoolchildren in the USA in 2017, and V. Cordonnier et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref14">14</xref>] (10%) in the French population in 2006.</p><p>Moreover, the prevalence found in the present study is higher than what has been reported by I. Baati in 2020 in Tunisia (8.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref15">15</xref>] . Beutel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref16">16</xref>] in Germany in 2017 also reported a lower prevalence than the one in the present study (4.2%). The different types of questionnaires, the study population and the difference in sample size could account for these observed differences. Indeed, the Beutel et al. study was carried out in the general population and involved 2,522 people, a much larger sample size than the present study, which was carried out in schools.</p><p>In addition, several other authors have reported higher prevalences. Ross et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref17">17</xref>] in 2012 among youth groups in Sweden found 18% problematic cybersex users, and Satyanaraya et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref18">18</xref>] in India in 2021 reported that 22% of local university students had problematic cybersex use.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Socio-Demographic Characteristics</title><p>Age</p><p>The average age of the students surveyed in was 16.99 &#177; 2.16 years. This result is quite close to the one of Rafael Ballester [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] in Spain in 2015 (14.76 &#177; 0.97) as well as Alexa et al. one [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref19">19</xref>] in 2019 (15.42 years).</p><p>The age extremes of the students surveyed in this study are 11 to 30 years. They were 14 to 97 years old in the study by Manfred E. Beutel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref16">16</xref>] in Germany in 2017, and at least 18 years old in India in the study by Satyanaraya et al. in 2021 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref18">18</xref>] . This difference can be explained by the absence of an age limit in our study. Under our skies, puberty is becoming increasingly precocious, which only serves to arouse interest in sexuality at an early age, due to its genesis in great curiosity. As the question of sexuality is taboo in our country, the youngest try to talk about it among themselves in small groups, and then rely on the Internet to get to the bottom of it, all the more so as no importance is attached to parental control over connection tools under our skies. As a result, teenagers and young people are the most exposed to the problematic use of cybersexuality, and special attention should be paid to them, especially as we recognize that young people are the driving force behind development, and need to be educated, informed and empowered before any technological adventure.</p><p>Gender</p><p>In the present study, male gender predominated (65.45%) among students with problematic cybersex use. This result concurs with that of Ballester et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] 2015 in Spain, who also found a male predominance of 48.8%. A. W&#233;ry et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref7">7</xref>] 2014 in Canada, evoked a predominance of the disorder in two-thirds of men. The same is true with Kumar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref12">12</xref>] 2022 in India, who reported a male predominance of 68%. A similarly high prevalence of addiction to cybersexuality was reported by Satyanaraya et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref18">18</xref>] 2021 in India and by Beutel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref16">16</xref>] 2017 in Germany.</p><p>Living environment</p><p>The present study reported a higher proportion of cybersex addiction in urban than in rural areas (53 (96.36%) of those with cybersex addiction). Similar findings were revealed by Weinstein et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref20">20</xref>] 2015 in Germany, who found a proportion of 83.5%. Satyanarayana et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref18">18</xref>] 2021 in India reported that only 10% of the students with addiction in their study lived in rural areas. The study by Cooper et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref21">21</xref>] 2004 in the United States follows the same dynamic, stating that 64% of people with problematic cybersex use lived in urban areas.</p><p>Level of study</p><p>Problem use of cybersexuality was observed more at graduate level than at undergraduate level. This could mean that sexual cyberaddiction is more prevalent at higher levels of education. Cordonnier et al. in their study of a general population in France found that more than half of respondents presenting a problematic use of cybersexuality (61%) were in higher education [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref14">14</xref>] . Without specifying the values, other studies have followed this line of thought; for example, Giordano et al. in the USA (2017) and Ballester et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] in Spain (2015) found after their studies that problematic use of cybersexuality was higher among students with a higher level of schooling. The study carried out by Rousseau et al. in Normandy in 2018 in a population of adolescents aged 15 to 17 found a high level of cybersexuality use among students in advanced classes. Indeed, adolescence is a period of metamorphosis, hormonal cascade and growing curiosity about questions of sexuality. The degree of curiosity seems to evolve with age, maturity and the vagueness that surrounds certain subjects of interest such as sexuality.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Biography</title><p>Marital status</p><p>The results of the present study reported 32 (58.18%) students with a problematic use of cybersexuality, not involved in a romantic relationship. Other authors have reported similar results. Beutel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref16">16</xref>] in 2017 in Germany found a proportion of 56.1% of single people addicted to cybersex. Weinstein et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref20">20</xref>] 2015 found 57.7%. On the other hand, Cooper et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref21">21</xref>] in 2004 in their study in the USA found that almost 60% of subjects with problematic cybersex use were in a committed romantic relationship, and more than half were married. This difference could be explained by the limited age range imposed by their study, taking into account only adults (18 - 70 years) on the one hand, and on the other, by the targeting of the present study by remaining strictly within the school environment.</p><p>Sexuality discussed with parents</p><p>The study revealed that 60% of students had never discussed sexuality with their parents. Of these, 74.5% had developed an addiction to cybersexuality. Tchoukou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref22">22</xref>] in 2022, in their study of sexual addiction in the general population of Parakou, found that 47.9% of young people did not discuss sexuality with their parents, and 48.6% were sex addicts. This result once again confirms the toxicity of the mysterious meaning reserved for sexuality. If we don’t talk about it, or if we don’t shed light on students’ darker side, they’ll be more likely to explore it themselves on the Internet.</p><p>Number of sexual partners</p><p>This study shows that targets in a romantic or sexual relationship had an average of 1.79 sexual partners. This is higher than the average of 1.27 sexual partners reported by Satyanara et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref18">18</xref>] in India. This could be explained by the size of the sample considered. This sample had a strictly superior size of 853 participants.</p><p>Consumption of psychoactive substances</p><p>The number of students using alcohol in the present study sample was 56.63%. Among problematic cybersex users, 65.45% of students were regular drinkers. Simon Marmet et al. in Switzerland in 2018 dug deeper and reported that 18.6% of respondents in their study had problematic alcohol consumption. This result would suggest that, beyond the simple consumption of alcohol revealed by this study, problematic users of cybersexuality could also be dealing with problematic consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>They were respectively 05.18% and 03.31% of targets addicted to cybersexuality to use tobacco and cannabis and other drugs. In the same study in Switzerland in 2018, Marmet et al. found that 11.1% of those with an addiction to cybersexuality had a problematic use of cannabis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Pires et al. in Portugal in 2019, found in their study conducted in a detoxification center that 78% of psychoactive substance users had a problematic use of cybersexuality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref24">24</xref>] . They added that cocaine and other drug users were more addicted to cybersex than alcohol users. In the current study, 50% (8/16) of targets using cannabis or other drugs had a problematic use of cybersexuality.</p><p>Factors associated with addiction to cybersexuality in multivariate analysis</p><p>Sexual partners</p><p>A significant association between having a sexual partner and addiction to cybersexuality was found in this study (p = 0.010). It multiplied the risk of problematic use of cybersexuality by 2.534. The same finding was made by Ballester et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] (p = 0.012) and Beutel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref16">16</xref>] (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p>Connection to pornographic sites</p><p>Connection to pornographic websites is significantly linked to problematic use of cybersexuality, as revealed by this study (p &lt; 0.001). This risk factor has been reported in numerous studies. These include Ross et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref17">17</xref>] (p = 0.001) and Ballester et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] (p &lt; 0.001). Rousseau et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref25">25</xref>] found in their study that it was a factor multiplying by 4.19 the risk of problematic use of cybersexuality.</p><p>In the present study, external genital discharge (OR = 5.37; p = 0.049), and depression (OR = 2.75; p = 0.018) were significantly associated with addiction to cybersexuality. Several authors did not find the same results.</p><p>According to Ballester et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref13">13</xref>] , male gender, sexual orientation and certain offline sexual relationships are risk factors for addiction to cybersexuality. This explains why the factors vary from one environment to another, depending on the study population.</p><p>Anxiety</p><p>Anxiety was another factor that this study found to be significantly related to addiction to cybersexuality (OR = 3.863; p &lt; 0.001). Indeed, subjects with anxiety had a high risk of problematic use of cybersexuality. This is a point shared by other authors. Beutel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref16">16</xref>] found a similar result in their study. But it’s not possible to state definitively whether this anxiety is either a consequence or a cause of addiction to cybersexuality.</p><p>Prevalence of sexting, d&#233;dipix, skin parties and dating sites</p><p>The practice of sexting in the present study was summarized by a proportion of 08.90% of students having sent their nude photos and/or videos to an interlocutor on the Internet, and by 30.70% having received similar messages. Marion R et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref25">25</xref>] in France in 2018 also found a higher number of receivers than senders. Above the proportions of the present study, they reported that 62.7% were receivers and 22.1% senders. This difference could be explained by their study’s larger sample size (1208) than the one of the present study. Following the same logic, Kim et al. and Gonzalez et al. found in Canada and Spain respectively: sending 14.4% and receiving 27%, then sending 24% and receiving 58% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129439-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Dedipix, skin parties and dating sites are not discussed very much, but they account for 5%, 21.2% and 15.1% of cybersex practices respectively in this study.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Considered a taboo, sensitive subject that requires at least seven tongue-twisters before it can be discussed by informed subjects, sexuality is increasingly accessible from school age. Not talking about it means not providing reliable sources of information to young people who, by the accessibility, anonymity and adaptability of the Internet, are quenching their thirst for curiosity on the subject. With a taste for the sensational behind the screens, self-control becomes difficult, leading to problematic use of the Internet in the field of sexuality (cybersexuality). The latter is of ever-increasing interest, given the recurrence of sextortion, suicides and rapes that are increasingly being recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Elie, A.I.N., Kemo, S., Sinet, K.D., Fid&#232;le, A., Djibrilla, M., Oumou, O.Z., Elvire, D.S.E., Ignace, T.C.N., Oumar, S., Anselme, D., Francis, T.T., Prosper, G. and Josiane, E.H. (2023) Cybersex Addiction in Benin Schools (2023). Open Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 438-460. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpsych.2023.135032</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129439-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lavoie, L. (2001) Utopia: De quelques utopies actuelles à l’aube du 3e millénaire. Presses Université Laval, Laval.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khatcherian, E. and Achab, S. (2021) Lorsque la cybersexualite devient une addiction. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353379666_Lorsque_la_cybersexualite_devient_une_addiction_in_Revue_Dependances</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rousseau, M. (2021) La cybersexualité active chez les adolescents. Sages-Femmes, 21, 48-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sagf.2022.06.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demierre, I. (2019) Pornographie et adolescence, comment améliorer la pratique en conseil et en éducation sexuelle? Diploma of Advanced Studies (DAS).https://www.sante-sexuelle.ch/assets/docs/SSR_19-21_TD_DEMIERRE.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kr&amp;#228;mer, N., Brand, M., D&amp;#246;ring, N., et al. (2022) Sexual Interaction in Digital Contexts: Opportunities and Risks for Sexual Health. Frontiers Media, Lausanne.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giordano, A. and Cashwell, C. (2017) Cybersex Addiction among College Students: A Prevalence Study. Sex Addict Compulsivity, 24, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2017.1287612</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wéry, A., Karila, L., Sutter, P.D. and Billieux, J. (2014) Conceptualisation, évaluation et traitement de la dépendance cybersexuelle: Une revue de la littérature. Canadian Psychology, 55, 266-281. http://hdl.handle.net/10993/29696 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tordo, F. (2020) Cybersexualité. De la trans@sexualité aux métamorphoses de l’identité de genre sexuel. Psychologie Clinique, 49, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1051/psyc/202049016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stern, A.F. (2014) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Occupational Medicine, 64, 393-394. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2023) Dépistage de la personnalité borderline. https://fr.reoveme.com/depistage-de-la-personnalite-borderline/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wéry, A., Burnay, J., Karila, L. and Billieux, J. (2016) The Short French Internet Addiction Test Adapted to Online Sexual Activities: Validation and Links with Online Sexual Preferences and Addiction Symptoms. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1051213</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, V., Sachdeva, A., Khullar, S., et al. (2022) Internet Pornography Use among Medical Students in India: Extent and Effect. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 4, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/26318318211065648</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ballester-Arnal, R., Giménez-García, C., Gil-Llario, M.D. and Castro-Calvo, J. (2016) Cybersex in the “Net Generation”: Online Sexual Activities among Spanish Adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordonnier, V. (2006) Cybersexe et addiction: Quelle thérapie? Sexologies, 15, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2006.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baati, I., Frikha, M.T., Jedidi, J., Mnif, L., Sellami, R., Damak, J., et al. (2020) Internet et sexualité chez les étudiants en médecine. Annales Médico-Psycho-logiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 178, 837-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2019.10.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beutel, M.E., Giralt, S., W&amp;#246;lfling, K., et al. (2017) Prevalence and Determinants of Online-Sex Use in the German Population. PLOS ONE, 12, e0176449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176449</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ross, M.W., M&amp;#229;nsson, S.A. and Daneback, K. (2012) Prevalence, Severity, and Correlates of Problematic Sexual Internet Use in Swedish Men and Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9762-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alla, S.R. (2021) Prevalence of Cybersex in India. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, 8, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJAR.2014.08.04.Art005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, S., Martin-Storey, A., Drossos, A., et al. (2020) Prevalence and Correlates of Sexting Behaviors in a Provincially Representative Sample of Adolescents. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 65, 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743719895205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weinstein, A.M., Zolek, R., Babkin, A., Cohen, K. and Lejoyeux, M. (2015) Factors Predicting Cybersex Use and Difficulties in Forming Intimate Relationships among Male and Female Users of Cybersex. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooper, A., Delmonico, D., Griffinshelley, E. and Mathy, R.M. (2004) Online Sexual Activity: An Examination of Potentially Problematic Behaviors. Sex Addict Compulsivity, 11, 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160490882642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romaric, T.S.N. (2022) Prévalence et facteurs associés à l’addiction sexuelle chez les sujets agés de 18 ans et plus dans la commune de Parakou en 2022. Medical Degree Thesis, Université de Parakou, Parakou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Addiction Suisse (2018) Soziodemographische Ungleichheiten beim problematischen Substanzgebrauch und bei substanzunabh?ngigen problematischen Verhaltensweisen. https://www.addictionsuisse.ch/publication/soziodemographische-ungleichheiten-beim-problematischen-substanzgebrauch-und-bei-substanzunabhaengigen-problematischen-verhaltensweisen/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pires, T. and Ribeiro, M. (2019) Cybersex, Mental Health and Intimacy: An Exploratory Study Next to a Population in Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20246.09283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rousseau, M. (2018) Prévalence et facteurs de vulnérabilité de la cybersexualité active chez les adolescents de 15 à 17 ans en Normandie Occidentale. Médecine Humaine et Pathologie. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-02043702v1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129439-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouchard, M.C., Jalbert, G., Bourassa, D., Bernier, N. and C&amp;#244;té, K. (2022) Production, envoi et retransmission de sextos chez les adolescents: Prévalence et facteurs associés [Production, Sending and Retransmission of Sexting in Adolescents: Prevalence and Associated Factors]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 55, 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000321</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>