<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2023.1411070</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-129403</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  &lt;i&gt;Parkia biglobosa&lt;/i&gt; (Jacq.) R. Br. Ex G. Don Fruit Pulp Supplementation in the Diet of Local Chickens in Burkina Faso: Effects on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hadidjatou</surname><given-names>Bélem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roland</surname><given-names>Nâg-Tiero Meda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Benjamin</surname><given-names>Kouliga Koama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Windmi</surname><given-names>Kagambéga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sandrine</surname><given-names>Nadege Da</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anne</surname><given-names>Flora Drabo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Assetou</surname><given-names>Sawadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cyprial</surname><given-names>Ndumiso Ncobela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marie-Pierre</surname><given-names>Létourneau-Montminy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amadou</surname><given-names>Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>George</surname><given-names>Anicet Ouédraogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Research and Teaching in Animal Health and Biotechnology, Nazi-Boni University, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agriculture, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban, South Africa</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Laboratory of Animals Biology and Health, Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Animals Sciences, Laval University, Quebec, Canada</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Traditional Medicine and Pharmacopoeia, Research Institute of Health Sciences, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1119</fpage><lpage>1132</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This work aimed to evaluate the effects of supplementation of 
  Parkia 
  biglobosa fruit pulp flour in the CPAVI chicken ration on the growth performance 
  and carcass characteristics of local chickens. This study involved 50 local chicks of eight weeks of age. Chickens were divided into 5 groups of 10 chicks corresponding to five experimental rations containing 0%, 1%, 2%, 3% and 4% pulp from fruits of 
  P. 
  biglobosa. The nutritional composition of 
  P. 
  biglobosa fruit pulps were analyzed, then growth parameters and carcass characteristics were measured. The results showed that the fruit pulps of 
  P. 
  biglobosa were rich in metabolizable energy (4015.02 &#177; 0.21 Kcal/kg), crude fiber (16.88% ADF and 19.81% NDF) and potassium
   
  (2.45% &#177; 0.01%). Thus, the group of local chickens fed the diet containing 1% supplementation had a significantly higher live weight (1200.85 g) and carcass yield (91.99 g) (P &lt; 0.005) than the other levels
   
  supplementation. Additionally, individual feed consumption and average daily gain of the group at 1% supplementation were higher. In short, the flour from the pulp of the fruit of Parkia biglobosa can be supplemented up to 1% in the CPAVI pullet type feed for local chickens.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Local Chicken</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Parkia biglobosa&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> CPAVI</kwd><kwd> Growth Performance</kwd><kwd> Burkina Faso</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In Burkina Faso, poultry products represent 6% of the Gross Domestic Product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref1">1</xref>] . According to national statistical data, the national production of local hens reached a record 71,816,000 heads in 2013 before dropping to 36,794,000 heads in 2019, a drop of more than 48% in the space of 5 years. This drop in production accelerated from 2017, dropping from 62,475,000 heads to 36,794,000 heads in 2019, dizzying drop of more than 40% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref2">2</xref>] . This drop in production of local chickens would be linked to several zootechnical and health constraints, the main one being food. The qualitative and quantitative shortage of local poultry feed is a serious challenge this sector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref2">2</xref>] . The availability of cereals and protein raw materials for poultry farming are low and prices high, hence a strong impact on the quality and cost of production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref3">3</xref>] . The sustainable development of poultry farming in Burkina Faso could go through the formulation of economically more profitable feed rations based on available and inexpensive local resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref4">4</xref>] . Many local plants are widely regarded as potential sources of energy in human and animal nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref5">5</xref>] . This is the case of Parkia biglobosa, which is a particularly abundant tree in Burkina Faso and the pulps of these fruits are known to be mainly rich in energy but also in raw proteins, minerals, amino acids and carotene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref6">6</xref>] . It is therefore necessary to develop other feeding systems, based on the fruit pulp of Parkia biglobosa. The objective of this present work is to supplement the flour of the pulps of the fruits of Parkia biglobosa as feed additives in poultry farming in order to improve the food and the productivity of the local chicken.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The study was conducted at the Nazi BONI University animal facility in the village of Nasso located about 15 km northwest of the city of Bobo-Dioulasso (economic capital of Burkina Faso). The climate in Bobo-Dioulasso is of the south-Sudanian type and characterized by a dry season (October to April) and a rainy season (May to september). The dry season is characterized by a cold period (November to January) and a hot period (February to April). The rains are relatively abundant with about 1100 mm of water per year, but unevenly distributed in time and space. The vegetation consists of wooded, treed and shrubby savannahs. The relief is not very rugged and is characterized by a rocky range to the south, lowlands and developable plains. The soils are very favorable for agriculture. The network hydrographic, presents about twenty sources, the most important of which is that of the Guinguette in the village of Nasso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Housing Facility</title><p>The 16 m long, 10 m wide and 4.5 m height building has been fitted out with 3 compartments and two food storage magazines. The compartment used for this study measured 1.5 m in length, 1.5 m in width and 1.6 m in height and was subdivided into 5 enclosures. Each enclosure had a length and width of 1.5 m and a height of 1.6 m. The enclosures were equipped with feeders, drinkers and natural lighting. The various mesh enclosures were covered with a thick layer (about 15 cm) of bedding consisting of rice bran.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Experimental Birds</title><p>A total of 50 subjects aged 8 weeks with an average weight of 575.4 &#177; 18.11 g were distributed between the boxes. The experimental chickens were produced at the Nazi Boni University farm. They have been vaccinated against the main avian diseases (Newcastle and Gumboro disease), and have also been dewormed (internal and external parasites).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Collection of Parkia biglobosa</title><p>Parkia biglobosa fruit pulps were harvested in Nasso located 15 km from Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). After drying in the shade, the samples were then ground and stored for the various analyses.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental Rations</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Nutritional Composition of Parkia biglobosa Fruit Pulp</title><p>Solids and ash contents were determined using official methods of analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref8">8</xref>] . Crude fat was extracted with anhydrous diethyl ether using the Soxtec TM 2050 apparatus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref9">9</xref>] . Crude protein and nitrogen amounts were determined with the Kjeldahl method using lock digestion and the Foss 8400 system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref10">10</xref>] . Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) and Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) contents were analyzed using Ankom Fiber Analyzer 2000. Gross energy was measured with Parr 6300 calorimeter. For this, pellets solids were fabricated and introduced into the calorimeter to determine the energy value. The energy of each sample was calculated directly in relation to its weight. The ash was mixed with 5 mL of concentrated HNO<sub>3</sub> and 12.5 mL of 50% HCl. The mixture was boiled at low temperature on a hot plate, then allowed to cool. After cooling, the samples were filtered in and calibrated to 100 mL with distilled water. The different mineral salts were determined by atomic absorption or by spectrophotometer for phosphorus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref11">11</xref>] . Finally, the fatty acid profile was determined by the direct methylation method as described by Sukhija and Palmquist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref12">12</xref>] with some modifications.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. CPAVI Chicken Feed Formula</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presented the food formula of the CPAVI rations used to feed the different subjects. The Village Center for the Promotion of Poultry (CPAVI) is a state structure in Burkina Faso which works to promote village poultry farming by providing poultry farmers with a wide range of avian services.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Food Ration</title><p>Five feed rations namely PBO, PB1, PB2, PB3 and PB4 were formulated. The</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> CPAVI pullet feed ration</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ingr&#233;dients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pullets (% of ration)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Windmill sound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue sound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cottonseed meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shell</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Premix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lysine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methionine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dicalcium phosphate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron sulphate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>four treatments (PB1, PB2, PB3 and PB4) used had the same feed composition (CPAVI pullet feed) apart from the amount of flour from Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp which varied from 1% to 4%. The control batch (PBO) consisted solely of CPAVI pullet feed.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Experimental Apparatus</title><p>The 50 chickens were randomly distributed among the 5 boxes representing 5 treatments (4 test boxes and control box). Each box consisted of 10 chicks (5 males and 5 females). Water was available ad libitum. A quantity of food of 60 g per chick per day was offered. Food refusals were weighed and recorded daily. Monitoring of the subjects’ growth lasted 6 weeks and the chicks were weighed every weekend.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Collection of Data</title><p>Valuation of growth performance the growth parameters were calculated according to the calculation methods of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Consumption Index (CI)</title><p>It is the ratio between the average quantity of food consumed over a given period and the average weight gain corresponding to this period.</p><p>CI: Average amount of food consumed (in g)/Average weight gain (in days).</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. The Average Daily Gain (ADG)</title><p>The weekly measurements of the weights listed, made it possible to calculate the average gain daily by reporting weight gain for a period over time corresponding.</p><p>ADG = (PVf − PVi)/number of days. (PVi: initial average live weight and PVf: final average live weight).</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Individual Food Consumption (IFC)</title><p>Individual Food Consumption is used to assess the quantities of food consumed per animal over a specified period of time. It is calculated from the quantity of food distributed and that refused.</p><p>CAI (g/subject/day) = QAD(g) − QAR(g)/Duration of period (d) &#215; number of subjects.</p><p>QAD: Quantity of feed distributed; QAR: Quantity of food refused.</p></sec><sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. Live Weight</title><p>The average live weight is nothing other than the ratio of the sum of the weights of the individuals of a same batch by their number.</p><p>Live weight = ΣWI/Nb.</p><p>ΣWI: Sum of the weights of the individuals of the same batch Nb: Number of the batch.</p><p>The mortality rate is the number of deaths on the workforce of the batch &#215; 100.</p></sec><sec id="s3_10"><title>3.10. Carcass Characteristics</title><p>At the end of the experiment, 20 subjects (4 subjects/batch) were slaughtered for the study of the characteristics of the carcass. The animals were bled by section of the jugular vein of the neck, scalded with hot water and manually plucked. The live weights of the chickens before slaughter were measured as well as the weights of the carcasses. The abdominal and thoracic cavity organs were then dissected, removed and weighed separately.</p><p>RC = Empty carcass weight (in g)/Live weight at slaughter (in g) &#215; 100.</p></sec><sec id="s3_11"><title>3.11. Skin Color and Abdominal Fat</title><p>The possible yellow coloring of the skin and fat in yellow was assessed thanks to a scoring technique similar to that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref14">14</xref>] . Ranging from grade 1 to 4 independing on the intensity of the yellow color observed (1: absence of yellow color, 2: light to medium yellow color, 3: fairly well yellow color and 4: yellow color intense to dark). The carcass yield (%) is calculated by taking the ratio of the carcass weight to the live weight of the subject at slaughter, expressed as a percentage.</p></sec><sec id="s3_12"><title>3.12. Ethics Committee</title><p>This work has been submitted and approved by an ethics committee under the number CEEA-UJKZ/2021-07.</p></sec><sec id="s3_13"><title>3.13. Statistical Analyzes</title><p>The Tables were produced by the Excel 2021 software. The software R version 4.2.1 was used for the statistical processing and the calculation of means and deviations.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Nutritional Composition of Parkia biglobosa Fruit Pulp</title><p>The nutritional values of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp were presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp was low in protein (5.11% &#177; 0.131%), in lipids (1.12% &#177; 0.094%) and minerals such as iron (0.14% &#177; 0.05%), phosphorus (0.05% &#177; 0.00%), zinc (0.10% &#177; 0.03%), magnesium (0.28% &#177; 0.06%) and calcium (0.18% &#177; 0.01%). On the other hand, it was rich in energy (4015.02% &#177; 0.21% Kcal/Kg), ADF (16.88% &#177; 0.06%) and NDF (19.81% &#177; 0.19%)) and in potassium (2.45% &#177; 0.01%). Concerning the fatty acid contents of the pulps of Parkia biglobosa, they varied from 0.08% to 40.99% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Of the nineteen fatty acids quantified, there were eight saturated, two omega-3s, three omega-6s, one omega-7, two omega-9s and two omega-11s. Palmitic and stearic acids were the most abundant saturated fatty acids. Regarding the omega series, linoleic acid (24.64%), oleic acid (15.47%) and α-Linolenic acid (5.66%) were the most abundant fatty acids.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Nutritional value of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.07 &#177; 0.009 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80 &#177; 0.017 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.93 &#177; 0.009 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11 &#177; 0.131 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82 &#177; 0.021 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12 &#177; 0.094 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.88 &#177; 0.06 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NDF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.81 &#177; 0.19 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4015.02 &#177; 0.21 Kcal/Kg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45 &#177; 0.01 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.05 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.00 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 &#177; 0.03 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.06 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 &#177; 0.01 (%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values were Mean &#177; standard deviation (n = 3).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Fatty acids contents of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Classification</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Symbol</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name of compounds</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parkia biglobosa (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Saturated fatty acids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C14:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myristic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C15:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pentad&#233;cano&#239;c acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C16:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmitic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C17:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Margaric acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stearic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arachidic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Docosano&#239;c acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C24:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T&#233;tracosano&#239;c acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Omega-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:3n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Linolenic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:3n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cis-11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:6n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Docosahexaenoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Omega-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:2n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linoleic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:3n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >γ-Linolenic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:2n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Docosadienoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Omega-7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C16:1n7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmitoleic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Omega-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:1n9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oleic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:1n9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erucic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Omega-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:1n11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vaccenic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:1n11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gadoleic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Effect of Parkia biglobosa Fruit Pulp Supplementation on Growth Performance of Local Chickens</title><p>Consumption index (CI)</p><p>The effects of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp supplementation on the feed conversion ratio (CI) of chickens are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Overall, the consumption index (CI) ranged from 7.25 to 9.65. Supplementation with Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp led to a reduction in the consumption index of 1% of supplementation.</p><p>Average daily gain (ADG)</p><p>The average daily gains (ADG) obtained per batch or from different food treatments are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. It appears that the supplementation of flour from Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp in the CPAVI diet had led to an increase in the average daily gain of batch PB1 compared to the other batches of the treatment (PB0; PB2; PB3 and PB4). However, the difference was not significant between the different values obtained (P &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the feed supplementation on the consumption index</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Inclusion level</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >CI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 to 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PB0 (Parkia biglobosa 0%), PB1 (Parkia biglobosa 1%), PB2 (Parkia biglobosa 2%), PB3 (Parkia biglobosa 3%) et PB4 (Parkia biglobosa 4%). P &lt; 0.05.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the feed formulations on average daily gain</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Food processing</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >ADG (g/d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PB0 (Parkia biglobosa 0%), PB1 (Parkia biglobosa 1%), PB2 (Parkia biglobosa 2%), PB3 (Parkia biglobosa 3%) et PB4 (Parkia biglobosa 4%). P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>Individual Food Consumption (IFC)</p><p>The effect of the experimental rations on the evolution of individual food consumption as a function of time is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. The results showed a significant increase in the food consumption of batch PB1 compared to the other test batches (PB2; PB3 and PB4) and the control batch PB0 throughout the experiment (P &lt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Live Weights</title><p>The effect of the inclusion of flour from the pulp of the fruit of Parkia biglobosa in the feed ration on the weight of local chickens according to their ages is illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>. A significant improvement (P &lt; 0.05) in weight was observed in chickens from the PB1 treatment compared to the other batches (PB0, PB2, PB3 and PB4) during the first week up to the third week of age. However, from the fourth to the sixth week no significant difference was observed between the weights of the animals (P &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the experimental rations on individual food consumption</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Inclusion level</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >IFC (g/d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PB0 (Parkia biglobosa 0%), PB1 (Parkia biglobosa 1%), PB2 (Parkia biglobosa 2%), PB3 (Parkia biglobosa 3%) et PB4 (Parkia biglobosa 4%). P &lt; 0.05.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the experimental rations on live weight</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Food processing</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >live weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PB0 (Parkia biglobosa 0%), PB1 (Parkia biglobosa 1%), PB2 (Parkia biglobosa 2%), PB3 (Parkia biglobosa 3%) et PB4 (Parkia biglobosa 4%). P &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Characteristic of the Carcass</title><p>The characteristics of the carcass and organs of local chickens from the different dietary treatments were recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. Carcass yield ranged from 1065.18 &#177; 82.51 to 1200.85 &#177; 80.69 (g). The highest value was recorded in chickens from the PB1 treatment (P &lt; 0.05). The supplementation of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp flour in the CPAVI pullet ration of local chickens resulted in a better yield of the carcass of batch PB1 (91.99% &#177; 2.78%) compared to the control batch PB0 (91.45% &#177; 3%) and the other PB2 test batches (63.15% &#177; 2.38%); PB3 (90.37% &#177; 1.33%) and PB4 (89.91% &#177; 44.96%) (P &lt; 0.05). There was no change in coloring of the skin of the carcass of chickens from the test batches (PB1, PB2, PB3 and PB4) compared to the control batch (PB0) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The supplementation of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp flour resulted in a yellow coloring of the abdominal fat of batches PB2, PB3 and PB4 compared to batch PB1 and the control batch PB0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). As for pH and temperature, they were similar to that of the control (P &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Effect on carcass characteristic</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Food processing</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PBO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PB4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Carcass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lw (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1185.40 &#177; 137.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200.85 &#177; 80.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1134.87 &#177; 185.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1065.18 &#177; 82.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1086.27 &#177; 39.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cw (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1082.57 &#177; 108.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1106.18 &#177; 106.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1039.53 &#177; 194.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >961.95 &#177; 64.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >976.50 &#177; 28.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cy (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.45 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.99 &#177; 2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.15 &#177; 2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.37 &#177; 1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.91 &#177; 44.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skin color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ns</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Belly fat color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ns</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Internal organs (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.23 &#177; 6.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 &#177; 2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.87 &#177; 2.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.93 &#177; 1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.10 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93 &#177; 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70 &#177; 3.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80 &#177; 0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.53 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23 &#177; 1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70 &#177; 0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85 &#177; 0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gizzard</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.90 &#177; 14.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.9 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.40 &#177; 15.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.93 &#177; 9.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.60 &#177; 11.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Testicles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40 &#177; 2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95 &#177; 13.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80 &#177; 5.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 &#177; 3.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47 &#177; 1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Physicochemical parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80 &#177; 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.345 &#177; 0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25 &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25 &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.125 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.57 &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.175 &#177; 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.30 &#177; 0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.23 &#177; 0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.175 &#177; 0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PB0 (Parkia biglobosa 0%), PB1 (Parkia biglobosa 1%), PB2 (Parkia biglobosa 2%), PB3 (Parkia biglobosa 3%) et PB4 (Parkia biglobosa 4%). Values were Mean &#177; standard deviation (n = 3). P &lt; 0.05. Lw: live weight, Cw: carcass weight; Cy: carcass yield.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>Increasing the productivity of local chickens in Burkina Faso requires improving the diet rich in nutritional elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref15">15</xref>] . For this, the effect of flour from the fruit pulp of Parkia biglobosa on growth performance and carcass characteristics of local hens from Burkina Faso were evaluated in this study. After analysis of the nutritional composition, the fruit pulps of Parkia biglobosa were rich in energy, crude fiber (ADF and NDF), and potassium. Indeed, energy, and potassium are very important for the development of the chicken because they are responsible for the maintenance of organic tissues, growth and the production of food such as eggs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref16">16</xref>] . The supplementation of 1% of Parkia biglobosa pulp flour in feed formulas (CPAVI feed) for local chickens had an improvement in the feed consumption index and in the average daily gain of batch PB1 even if this improvement was not significant compared to the other batches (PB0, PB2, PB3 and PB4). This improvement could be explained by the acceptable concentration of metabolizable energy of batch PB1 compared to batches PB0, PB2, PB3 and PB4. Regarding individual food consumption (IFC), it was high for batch PB1 during the experiment compared to the other test batches PB2, PB3 and PB4 and to the control batch (PB0). This could be explained by an increase in the energy concentration of the PB2, PB3 and PB4 regime, resulting in a decrease in consumption. The main dietary factor that affects food consumption is the concentration of energy present in food: an increase in food energy causes a decrease in consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref17">17</xref>] . In addition, the concentration of nutrients other than energy has no impact on appetite as long as this concentration remains within acceptable limits for the normal maintenance of health and the production of the bird [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref18">18</xref>] . The supplementation of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp in the feed ration had improved the live weight in chickens of the PB1 treatment and this significantly compared to the other batches (PB0, PB2, PB3 and PB4) during the first week until the third week of age (P &lt; 0.05). Effect the PB1 feed ration (1% of Parkia biglobosa pulp and CPAVI feed) could contain enough metabolizing energy and less crude fiber compared to PB2, PB3 and PB4. Indeed, feeds rich in crude fiber have been shown to negatively affect ingestion and digestion due to their minor roles in the energy intake of chickens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref19">19</xref>] . The supplementation of Parkia biglobosa pulp meal had no adverse effect on carcass yield, organ weight, skin color and abdominal fat compared to the control lot. On the other hand, the yield of the carcass of PB1 (91.99%) is higher than that of other batches (PB0 91.45%; PB2 63.15%; PB3 90.37% and PB4 89.91%) with P &lt; 0.05. Considering the level of vitamin A in the flour from the pulp of the fruit of Parkia biglobosa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref20">20</xref>] , we can therefore attribute this variation in the level of coloring of the abdominal fat of the PB2 batches to it; PB3 and PB4 compared to batch PB1 and PB0 (control). The supplementation therefore probably had an effect on the coloring of the abdominal fat of the affected groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref21">21</xref>] . pH and temperature are part of the quality parameters of poultry meat. The pH of chicken meat is 6.5 to 6.7, its reduction therefore results in paler meat and its low water retention capacity. Consequently, it leads to excessive hardening of the meat and less flavor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129403-ref22">22</xref>] . In this study, the pH and temperature of the test batches (PB1; PB2; PB3 and PB4) were similar to that of the control (P &gt; 0.05) and the standard (6.5 and 6.7).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, considered preliminary, CPAVI pullet feed was supplemented with Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp, taking into account only the quality aspect (by varying the proportion of Parkia biglobosa pulp) to carry out a practical study. The possibilities for improvement in terms of energy balance are very important since the two materials differ both in terms of quantity and quality. The analysis showed that the pulp of the fruit of Parkia biglobosa can be supplemented up to levels of 1% to 4%, in the ration of CPAVI pullets without lowering the performance of the chickens. However, supplementation of Parkia biglobosa fruit pulp at 1% showed better results. Faced with insufficient production and a high purchase cost of maize, a maize-pulp association of Parkia biglobosa would help poultry entrepreneurs not only to reduce the cost price of feed, but also to reduce the cost of production and obtain culled hens that are salable.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) funded project BKF5021 for material and financial assistance.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>H. Belem, R. N. T. Meda, B. K. Koama were involved in the design of the manuscript, in the laboratory analysis and in writing the first drafts of the manuscript, A. Traor&#233; and G. A. Ou&#233;draogo and C. N. Ncobela were involved in the revision and critical review of the manuscript. Kagamb&#233;ga, S. N. Da, A. F. Drabo contributed to the collection of samples. All authors participated in writing and revising the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Data Availability</title><p>Data will be available from the corresponding author upon request.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>B&#233;lem, H., Meda, R.N.-T., Koama, B.K., Kagamb&#233;ga, W., Da, S.N., Drabo, A.F., Sawadogo, A., Ncobela, C.N., L&#233;tourneau-Montminy, M.-P., Traor&#233;, A. and Ou&#233;draogo, G.A. (2023) Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br. Ex G. Don Fruit Pulp Supplementation in the Diet of Local Chickens in Burkina Faso: Effects on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14, 1119-1132. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2023.1411070</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129403-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministère de l’agriculture des ressources animales et halieutiques (MRAH) (2022) Aviculture au burkina faso: La stratégie nationale de développement de la filière en cours de validation. Communiqué de presse site. https://www.agriculture.bf/jcms/pv10_104293/fr/aviculture-au-burkina-faso-la-strategie-nationale-de-developpement-de-la-filiere-en-cours-de-validation</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bambio, Z.F. (2012) Elevage de poulet local: La production en chute. https://www.investirauburkina.net/secteurs-et-marches/elevage/elevage-de-poulet-local-la-production-en-chute.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Africa Press (2021) Aliments pour volaille: Le scoop annonce une augmentation des prix. Communiqué de presse. https://www.africa-press.net/burkina-faso/economie/aliments-pour-volaille-la-scoop-annonce-une-augmentation-des-prix</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pousga, S., Sankara, F.F., Coulibaly, K., Cacoulma, J.P., Ouedraogo, S., Kenis, M., Chrysostome, C. and Ouedraogo, G.A. (2019) Effets du remplacement de la farine de poisson par les termites (Macrotermes sp.) sur l’évolution pondérale et les caractéristiques de carcasse de la volaille locale au Burkina Faso. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 19, 14354-14371. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.85.17430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nys, Y.Y. (2001) Oligo-éléments, croissance et santé du poulet de chair. Productions Animales, 14, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2001.14.3.3737</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olugbemi, T.S., Mutayoba, S.K. and lekule, F.P. (2010) Evaluation of Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal Inclusion in Cassava Chip-Based Diets Fed to Laying Birds. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 22, 118. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/6/olug22118.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guinko, S. (1984) Végétation de la Haute-Volta. Master’s Thesis, Université de Bordeaux II, Bordeaux.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2001) AOAC Official Method 2001.11 Protein (Crude) in Animal Feed, Forage (Plant Tissue), Grain and Oilseeds Block Digestion Method Using Copper Catalyst and Steam Distillation into Boric Acid. http://img.21food.cn/img/biaozhun/20100108/177/11285190.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2001) AOAC 2003.06-2006, Crude Fat in Feeds, Cereal Grains, and Forages. http://www.aoacofficialmethod.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Analytical Chemists. 17th Edition, AOAC International, Gaithersburg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sukhija, P.S. and Palmquist, D.L. (1988) Rapid Method for Determination of Total Fatty Acid Content and Composition of Feedstuffs and Feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36, 1202-1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00084a019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Missoko, M.R., (2011) Essai d’incorporation de la farine de feuilles de Cassia tora dans l’alimentation chez les poulets locaux du Sénégal: Effets sur les performances de croissance, les caractéristiques de la carcasse et le résultat économique. Université cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, école inter—Etats des sciences et médecine vétérinaires.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaijage, J.T., Sarwatt, S.V. and Mutayoba, S.K. (2003) Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal Can Improve Quality Characteristics and Consumer Preference of Marketable Eggs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agriculture, Morogoro. http://www.costech.or.tz/Proceedings/Papers/Alphabetical/Moringa%20O</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hien, O.C., Diarr, B. and Coulibaly, Y. (2017) Effets d’une ration à base de la variété de mais 《Espoir》 sur la productivité des poulettes. International Journal of Biological Chemical Sciences, 11, 806-816. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i2.22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bordeaux, C. and Roinsard, A. (2015) Alimentation des volailles en agriculture biologique. Cahier Technique, 68 p. https://abiodoc.docressources.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_dis-play&amp;id=32438</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larose, M. (1992) L’élevage de la volaille, Tome 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AkadirI, F.J., Aboh, A.B., Atchade, G.S.T., Olounlade, P.A. and Houndonougbo, F.M. (2022) Préférence des aliments source d’énergie et digestibilité des rations alimentaires contenues des cossettes d’igname trifoliee. (Dioscorea dumetorum Pax) chez les poulets de chair au Benin. Agronomie Africaine, 34, 11-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mateos, G., Jiménez-Moreno, E., Serrano, M. and Lázaro, R. (2012) Poultry Response to High Levels of Dietary Fiber Sources Varying in Physical and Chemical Characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 21, 156-174. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2011-00477</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toure, A.I., Zougou, G.C.T., Obiang, C.S., Abui-Mba, X.W., Mboko, A.V., Matumuini, F.N., Engonga, L.C.O., Zoro, B.I.A., Boukila, B. and Atcho, O. (2020) Controle de la qualité granulométrique et nutritionnelle des aliments pour animaux à la Société Meunière et Avicole du Gabon (SMAG). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 155, 15974-15985.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouvarel, I., Hervé, J., Michel, L., Armelle, J., Evrard, J., Corniaux, A. and Brevault, N. (2003) Formulation en acides gras de l’aliment poulet de chair et présentation de la carcasse. Cinquièmes Journées de la Recherche Avicole, 26-27 March.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129403-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Rammouz, R. (2005) Etude des changements biochimiques post mortem dans le muscle des volailles. Contribution au déterminisme de l’amplitude de la diminution du pH. Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse (France), 263 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>