<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2023.1411066</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-129293</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Influence of Tea Leaf Particle Size on Catechin Extraction and Green Tea Sensory Acceptance
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dongyang</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ritsuko</surname><given-names>Tamura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Toshiro</surname><given-names>Nakajima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuko</surname><given-names>Caballero</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Tohoen Company, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Research Center for Agricultural Information Technology, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Ibaraki, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1043</fpage><lpage>1056</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The intensity of the bitterness of catechins increases with increased concentration, but the taste palatability decreased in green tea extract. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a blend of tea leaf particles of various sizes would result in a good balance between catechin content and appreciable taste. The control is common tea (CT) with 6 - 10 mm long leaves. Blend tea (BT) was prepared by mixing 5 mm and 120 - 130 mm long tea leaves in a 
  ratio of 3:2. The catechin content of hot water extracts was analyzed by HPLC, and the sensory test was conducted with 99 volunteers. In BT, the total catechin content was significantly higher than that in CT. The sensory test results revealed that BT was less bitter and had more preferable color than CT. More catechins were extracted from BT, but it tasted less bitter. Thus, the recalibration of the tea leaf particle size can result in good balance between catechin content and palatability.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Blend Tea</kwd><kwd> Catechin Content</kwd><kwd> Sensory Test</kwd><kwd> Bitterness</kwd><kwd> Palatability</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Green tea (Camellia sinensis L.) is one of the most popular beverages consumed worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref1">1</xref>] . The daily consumption of tea is associated with many important health benefits because of its high polyphenol content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref5">5</xref>] . To increase the functional activity of green tea, agitation, circulation, ultrasonic and microwave irradiation, and enzyme treatments have been conducted for enhancing the extraction efficiency of polyphenols from green tea leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref7">7</xref>] . It has also been demonstrated that reducing the particle size of tea leaves to increase the surface area improves polyphenol extraction efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref8">8</xref>] . Catechins are the most important functional polyphenols in green tea, and show biological benefits because of their strong antioxidant and anti-angiogenic activities as well as their potential to inhibit cell proliferation and to modulate carcinogen metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref11">11</xref>] . Dry tea leaves contain 14% - 25% catechins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref12">12</xref>] . The main constituents of green tea catechins are (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg), gallocatechin (GC), epicatechin (EC), epigallocatechin (EGC), and epicatechin gallate (ECG) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>In addition, the caffeine content of tea leaves ranges from 3.9 to 4.6 mg/g, depending on the age of the leaf—higher caffeine concentrations are found in younger leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref17">17</xref>] . Caffeine positively stimulates the cognitive function and has the potential to improve task performance in our daily work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref18">18</xref>] . Both catechins and caffeine confer bitterness and astringency to green tea, which are the main constituents that contribute to the green tea taste. Therefore, the taste of green tea can change depending on the catechin and caffeine contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref20">20</xref>] . Polyphenol-rich green tea with less taste of bitter and astringent is ideal for daily consumption and is readily meets the commercial needs of green tea market.</p><p>The international market for Japanese green tea shows an annual increase. The world trade of green tea increased from 1000 to 2000 tons in 10 years from 2005 to 2015 (Japan Tea Central Public Interest Incorporated Association). A previous study showed that the preference for green tea among non-Asians was different from that among Asians, because sensory perception varies among cultures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref21">21</xref>] . Even among Asians, who consume green tea every day as a beverage, the preference for green tea varies depending on the countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref22">22</xref>] . Furthermore, studies comparing impressions and appreciation of green tea between countries are limited, especially between Japanese and non-Japanese Asians.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Theoretical</title><p>The taste characteristics of catechins consist primarily of the astringency and bitterness of tea, and the intensity increases with catechin concentration. However, catechins have tastes that consisted primarily of astringency and bitterness, thus the palatability decreases with the increasing of the catechin content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref23">23</xref>] . Herein, we hypothesized that a blend of tea particles of various sizes would result in a good balance between catechin content and the appreciable taste of the tea extract. Moreover, a sensory test was conducted to assess the preference of tea among people living in the United States, including Japanese and non-Japanese Asians.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Evaluation of the Sensory Taste</title><p>The green tea samples were kindly provided by the Tohoen Tea Company (Tokyo, Japan). Tea leaves were cut 5 mm and 120 - 130 mm long tea leaf particles by the cutting machine in the company used commercially. Blend tea (BT) samples were prepared with 60% of 5 mm and 40% of 120 - 130 mm long tea leaf particles. One common Japanese green tea product, made of 6 - 10 mm long tea leaf particles, has been used as a common tea (CT) sample. The BT and CT samples were measured 3 g of each in a glass pot and pour 200 mL of hot water (80˚C) and put without agitation for 3 minutes. After that, the pot was calmly swung for three turns and pour cups to make them the same concentration. Subsequently, to simulate the repetitive tea-making habits of many people, the tea leaves from the first brewing underwent a second brewing under the same conditions as those utilized in the first brewing. There were four samples in total: the first brewed samples of CT and BT and the second brewed samples of CT and BT.</p><p>Ninety-nine volunteers, including Japanese and non-Japanese subjects, participated in the sensory test conducted in a university, a shopping mall, and a seminar room in California, United States. The four tea samples were used simultaneously in the test. And the volunteers rinsed their mouths with water between samples.</p><p>The volunteers were instructed to evaluate five items: aroma strength, color preference, bitterness, sweetness, and overall impression. Before drinking, we asked the following two questions about the aspect and aroma of tea extraction: Do you like or dislike this color? How strong or weak is the aroma? After drinking, the volunteers were asked to evaluate the bitterness, sweetness, and overall impression of the four samples. The Likert scales from 0 to 6 were used for evaluation: from none or dislike to strong or like.</p><p>It was explained to the panelists that the sweetness was not from sugar but from the leaves themselves. Astringency was excluded because it could not be identified with bitterness among non-Asian people in our pilot study. Volunteers were asked to sign an informed consent if they agreed to participate in the survey. The protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Ochanomizu University (permission number: 2017-45).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Reagents and Chemicals</title><p>Standards of caffeine (&gt;98.5%), EC (&gt;99.0%), ECG (&gt;99.0%), EGC (&gt;99.0%), and EGCg (&gt;99.0%) were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan). HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile used in HPLC were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan).</p><p>The tea extract samples were prepared according to the sensory test by brewing 3 g of leaves in 200 mL of 95˚C hot water for 3 min (n = 3). After the first brewing, the tea leaves were filtered and subjected to the second brewing under the same conditions as those utilized for the first brewing.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. HPLC Analysis</title><p>The standard catechins were diluted in 10% ethanol (v/v) and diluted with Milli Q water. The tea extracts were filtered with 0.45 mL acrylic styrol filter, and diluted 10 times with Milli Q water. For green tea component analysis, 10 mL of the samples was loaded into the HPLC system. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The HPLC conditions were set according to the method published in the Shimadzu application news No. L304B. A Shim-park FC-ODS column (75 mm &#215; 4.6 mm ID) was used for the separation (Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan). Mobile phase A was 10.0 mM (sodium phosphate buffer (pH 2.6)), and acetonitrile was used as mobile phase B. The flow rate was set as 1.0 mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 40˚C. The UV detection wavelength was 270 nm. The gradient separation procedure was set as 7% phase B from 0.00 to 6.00 min, 20% phase B from 6.00 to 20.00 min, 50% phase B from 20.01 to 25.00 min, and 7% phase B at 25.01 min.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>All values are presented as mean &#177; standard error (SE) (n = 3). The data for the four samples were compared using an independent t-test with the SPSS software (IBM version 23). Scores of the sensory test were compared using one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni post-hoc test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to integrate all items and identify the characteristics of each sample.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sensory Test Result Evaluation</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the demographic characteristic of participants in this study. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the scores of the preference and strength of taste for all participants. As is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the score of the color preference of the first brewing BT sample was the highest, and there was a significant difference between first brewing BT and second brewing CT samples (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>The first and second brewing CT samples were bitterer than the first and second brewing BT samples; there was a significant difference in their scores and those of the second brewing BT samples (P &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the scores of sweet intensities among the four samples. However, the second brewing BT samples was the sweetest. The average score of aroma for the first brewing CT sample was the highest. However, there were no significant differences in the scores for the two groups. The scores of the overall impression were almost the same among the four samples, with no significant difference.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Demographic characteristic of participants (n = 99)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Japanese (n = 55)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Non-Japanese Asian (n = 23)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Non-Asian (n = 19)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Blank (n = 2)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the PCA results, which is an integration of the sensory test. PC1 accounted for 39.7% of all factors, and the values for each item were almost the same. Therefore, we named PC1 as a balance. PC2 accounted for 21.0% of the total. The bitterness values showed the highest contribution of all, and sweet intensity was relatively high. In contrast, the color preference values showed the lowest contribution. Thus, we named PC2 as the taste strength (bitterness and sweetness). The first brewing CT sample showed the highest level of PC1. In contrast, the second brewing CT sample showed the lowest level in PC1. The values for the first and second brewing BT samples were not as high as those of CT in both PC1 and PC2. However, they did not change drastically from the first to second brewing.</p><p>To clarify the ethnicity difference in tea preferences, the average scores of the five items were compared for each tea type. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the mean scores of sensory attributes among ethnicities. Color preference and overall impression showed significant differences only in the first brewing CT sample. Non-Japanese Asians liked the color and overall impression of the first brewing CT sample more than participants of other ethnicities.</p><p>Furthermore, the score of overall impression for the first brewing CT sample among non-Japanese Asians was higher than that for any other tea sample. In contrast, the scores of color preference and overall impression for the first brewed CT samples by the non-Asians were the lowest because the first brewed CT samples were more bitter and more yellow than any other samples.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Concentrations of Catechins and Caffeine by HPLC</title><p>Use a zero before decimal points: “0.25”, not 0.25”. Use “cm<sup>3</sup>”, not “cc”.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) shows the HPLC analysis results of standards. Caffeine, EC, ECG, EGC, and EGCg were separated under the HPLC conditions described in the method section of HPLC analysis. The catechin component results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mean scores of sensory attributes for different ethnicities</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tea type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Brewing time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Japanese (n = 57)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Non-Japanese Asian (n = 21)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Non-Asian (n = 20)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total (n = 98)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >CT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >First</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color preference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67 &#177; 1.27<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19 &#177; 1.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00 &#177; 1.84<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64 &#177; 1.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aroma strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10 &#177; 1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75 &#177; 1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.01 &#177; 1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bitter strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00 &#177; 1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00 &#177; 1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35 &#177; 1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07 &#177; 1.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet intensity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42 &#177; 1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24 &#177; 1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24 &#177; 1.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall impression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65 &#177; 1.36<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10 &#177; 1.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68 &#177; 1.86<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56 &#177; 1.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >BT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >First</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color preference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99 &#177; 1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60 &#177; 1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 &#177; 1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86 &#177; 1.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aroma strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.99 &#177; 1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75 &#177; 1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45 &#177; 1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83 &#177; 1.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bitter strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 &#177; 1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15 &#177; 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65 &#177; 1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66 &#177; 1.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet intensity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25 &#177; 1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15 &#177; 1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05 &#177; 1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19 &#177; 1.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall impression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56 &#177; 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60 &#177; 1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.05 &#177; 1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46 &#177; 1.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >CT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Second</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color preference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.12 &#177; 1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.13 &#177; 1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65 &#177; 1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23 &#177; 1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aroma strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92 &#177; 1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78 &#177; 1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55 &#177; 1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81 &#177; 1.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bitter strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26 &#177; 1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70 &#177; 1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15 &#177; 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10 &#177; 1.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet intensity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23 &#177; 1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83 &#177; 1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20 &#177; 1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13 &#177; 1.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall impression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.11 &#177; 1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30 &#177; 1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.70 &#177; 1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28 &#177; 1.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >BT</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Second</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color preference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62 &#177; 1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65 &#177; 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20 &#177; 1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 &#177; 1.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aroma strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52 &#177; 1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45 &#177; 1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.69 &#177; 1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bitter strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42 &#177; 1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76 &#177; 1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.64 &#177; 1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32 &#177; 1.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet intensity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42 &#177; 1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63 &#177; 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54 &#177; 1.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall impression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35 &#177; 1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68 &#177; 1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50 &#177; 1.35</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Different letters indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-hoc test at P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>The overall concentration of catechins was significantly higher in the first brewing BT samples than in the first brewing CT samples (P = 0.042). The catechin content of the second brewing samples decreased compared to that of the first brewing samples, but there was no difference between the BT and CT samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>In the first brewing tea samples, the EGC content of the BT sample increased significantly compared with that of the CT sample (P = 0.019). Additionally, EC and EGCg contents were 12.1% and 19.8% higher in the BT extract than those in the CT, respectively. The GC, ECG, and caffeine contents were similar in the first and second brewed BT and CT extracts. The catechin and caffeine contents of the second brewing samples decreased significantly compared with those of the first brewing samples. No difference was observed between the second brewing BT and CT samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In this study, we compared blend teas with different leaf particle sizes with normal Japanese Sencha by using component analysis and sensory test. The BT sample possessed higher catechin content than the CT sample, and no difference in the overall acceptance was observed.</p><p>In our study, the particle size and mixing ratio were assumed to be optimal based on previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref26">26</xref>] . The milled tea leaves showed the highest antioxidant activity after extraction, but incurred a bitter and astringent taste unlike that of normal tea leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref24">24</xref>] . Moreover, tea particles ranging from 100 to 180 μm had the highest catechin content (33.5 mg/g leaves) and the highest antioxidant activity. It seems that smaller tea particles (&lt;100 μm) cause less catechin to be extracted, which may be due to the grinding conditions. During grinding, the high temperature increases biochemical alterations in food materials and may result in the modification of their physicochemical properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref25">25</xref>] . Thus, we chose tea particles of approximately 120 μm in size. The most popular type of green tea is Sencha, which is most commonly manufactured in Japan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref28">28</xref>] . Before the tea is brewed, the quality of Sencha can be evaluated based on the shape, color, and aroma of the tea leaves. However, during the manufacturing process, the tea leaves can be reduced into pieces and even powder during pro- cesses such as tapping and roasting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref29">29</xref>] . Sencha with a mixture of large and small sizes is considered to be of low quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref30">30</xref>] . In this study, we found that mixing tea particles of different sizes release more antioxidants upon simple hot water brewing. Thus, unrefined Sencha can be promoted widely because of its easy manufacturing processes, low price, and high antioxidant yield.</p><p>The chemical composition is associated with the taste of teas in terms of bitterness, astringency, sweetness, and umami [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref31">31</xref>] . Catechins are known to confer astringency and bitterness to green tea, and the taste of catechin-rich tea tends to be bitter, unlike that of normally processed tea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref24">24</xref>] . To reduce the astringency of tea extracts caused by these reduced tea particles, approximately 5 mm of leaves were blended into the tea samples. Moreover, 5 mm and 120 - 130 μm long tea leaf particles mixed in a ratio of 3:2 resulted in the desirable taste. According to the results of the component analysis, more catechins were extracted from BT samples. It was necessary to assess the acceptability of the product’s taste among consumers. The taste analysis of catechins by human sensory evaluation and sensory test performed using the TS-500Z taste recognition system fitted with an AE1 and reference probes showed that ECG had the strongest taste intensity, followed by EGCg, EC, and EGC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref23">23</xref>] . In our study, the EGC content of the BT samples increased significantly in relation to that of the CT samples, but induced less bitterness in the BT samples than that of the CT samples in the sensory test (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It may also be induced by water-soluble carbohydrates and amino acids such as theanine, which contribute to the lower bitterness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref32">32</xref>] . In fact, a previous study showed that extraction from smaller tea leaf particles facilitated an increase in the number of amino acids and water-soluble carbohydrates than that from larger ones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><p>EGC and EGCg are the main catechins in the green tea extract. In boiled water, the EGCg and EGC contents were approximately 30% and 40%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref34">34</xref>] . EGCg is a predominant catechin and has several biological and pharmacological properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref35">35</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref41">41</xref>] . In our study, the EGCg content of the BT samples was higher than that of the CT samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)), which indicates that the beneficial effects of green tea were strong in the BT samples.</p><p>In the sensory test, there was no significant difference about overall impression though there was a significant difference in the bitter strength. It might because other factors like aroma also contributed to overall impression, and they offset the bitter strength. Ethnicity differences were expected between Asians and non-Asians. However, it was observed only in CT first brewing samples, while other types of tea did not show any significant differences between ethnicities. This result was different from some previous studies showing large differences between ethnicities in the palatability of green teas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref22">22</xref>] . This may be because the place where we conducted the study was California, the southern part of Los Angeles, where many Japanese restaurants are franchised, and green tea might have been commonly consumed in this region. A previous study reported that people who drink green tea regularly prefer green tea with higher flavor intensities, bitterness, and astringency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref42">42</xref>] . Another study showed that the range of palatability was related to familiarity with green tea rather than cultural differences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129293-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>In our study, some non-Asians wrote that they did not like the color of green tea because it was similar to that of urine. The first and second brewing BT samples were greener than the first and second brewing CT; this might reflect the color preference. The participants were not asked to evaluate astringency intensity because many panelists in our trial survey could not understand the concept of astringency. Therefore, the relationship between each item from the sensory test and chemical components combined with catechins, caffeine, and amino acids should be further analyzed, especially in terms of bitterness and astringency.</p><p>In the PCA, the scores for the first and second brewing BT samples did not change in either PC1 or PC2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). This suggests that the second brewing BT sample maintains the same quality of taste and flavor as the first brewing BT sample, which may enhance its commercial value.</p><p>In this study, the first brewing BT sample had more catechins than the first brewing CT sample. If the catechin content of the tea samples is the same, the catechin content may decrease in the second brewing samples. However, in this study, no differences in the sensory test and component analysis results were observed between the second brewing CT and BT samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the tea extracts prepared from a blend of tea leaves with various particle sizes (i.e., both 120 - 130 mm and 5 mm long) contain more catechins than those usually found in commercial tea products. Moreover, the higher antioxidant content did not alter the overall acceptance of the tea taste. Therefore, it is suggested to recalibrate the size of the tea leaves to small values to favor the extraction of catechins with antioxidant properties in commercial tea products.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We greatly appreciate Dr. Nami Fukutome’s suggestions and guidance for this study. This study was supported by the Program for Leading Graduate Schools in Ochanomizu University, supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Li, D.Y., Zhang, Y., Tamura, R., Nakajima, T. and Caballero, Y. (2023) Influence of Tea Leaf Particle Size on Catechin Extraction and Green Tea Sensory Acceptance. Food and Nutrition Scien- ces, 14, 1043-1056. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2023.1411066</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129293-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Narotzki, B., Reznick, A.Z., Aizenbud, D. and Levy, Y. (2012) Green Tea: A Promising Natural Product in Oral Health of the Article. Archives of Oral Biology, 57, 429-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.11.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chacko, S.M., Thambi, P.T., Kuttan, R. and Nishigaki, I. (2010) Beneficial Effects of Green Tea: A Literature Review of the Article. Chinese Medicine, 5, Article No. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-5-13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yokozawa, T., Nakagawa, T. and Kitani, K. (2002) Antioxidative Activity of Green Tea Polyphenol in Cholesterol-Fed Rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 3549-3552. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020029h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potenza, M.A., et al. (2007) EGCG, a Green Tea Polyphenol, Improves Endothelial Function and Insulin Sensitivity, Reduces Blood Pressure, and Protects against Myocardial I/R Injury in SHR. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 292, E1378-E1387. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00698.2006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roy, M.K., et al. (2010) ORAC and DPPH Assay Comparison to Assess Antioxidant Capacity of Tea Infusions: Relationship between Total Polyphenol and Individual Catechin Content. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 61, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637480903292601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vuong, Q.V., Tan, S.P., Stathopoulos, C.E. and Roach, P.D. (2012) Improved Extraction of Green Tea Components from Teabags Using the Microwave Oven. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 27, 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2012.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, P.R. and Eun, J.B. (2018) A Comparative Study of Ultra-Sonication and Agitation Extraction Techniques on Bioactive Metabolites of Green Tea Extract. Food Chemistry, 253, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.080</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaiter, A., Becker, L., Karam, M.C. and Dicko, A. (2016) Effect of Particle Size on Antioxidant Activity and Catechin Content of Green Tea Powderse. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53, 2025-2032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2201-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, C.S., Landau, J.M., Huang, M.T. and Newmark, H.L. (2001) Inhibition of Carcinogenesis by Dietary Polyphenolic Compounds. Annual Review of Nutrition, 21, 381-406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.381</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muto, S., Fujita, K., Yamazaki, Y. and Kamataki, T. (2001) Inhibition by Green Tea Catechins of Metabolic Activation of Procarcinogens by Human Cytochrome P450. Mutation Research, 479, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00204-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siddiqui, I.A., et al. (2009) Introducing Nanochemoprevention as a Novel Approach for Cancer Control: Proof of Principle with Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate. Cancer Research, 69, 1712-1716. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3978</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, L., et al. (2006) Compositional Analysis of Teas from Australian Supermarkets. Food Chemistry, 94, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graham, H.N. (1992) Green Tea Composition, Consumption, and Polyphenol Chemistry. Preventive Medicine, 21, 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90041-F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tadano, N., et al. (2010) Biological Actions of Green Tea Catechins on Cardia Troponin C. British Journal of Pharmacology, 161, 1034-1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00942.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musial, C., Kuban-Jankowska, A. and Gorska-Ponikowska, M. (2020) Beneficial Properties of Green Tea Catechins. The International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051744</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henning, S.M., et al. (2003) Catechin Content of 18 Teas and a Green Tea Extract Supplement Correlates with the Antioxidant Capacity. Nutrition and Cancer, 45, 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327914NC4502_13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dufresne, C.J. and Farnworth, E.R. (2001) A Review of Latest Research Findings on the Health Promotion Properties of Tea. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 12, 404-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2863(01)00155-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornelis, M.C., Weintraub, S. and Morris, M.C. (2020) Recent Caffeine Drinking Associates with Cognitive Function in the UK Biobank. Nutrients, 12, Article 1969. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12071969</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, Y.Q., et al. (2018) Quantitative Analyses of the Bitterness and Astringency of Catechins from Green Tea. Food Chemistry, 258, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez-Burillo, S., et al. (2018) Effect of Brewing Time and Temperature on Antioxidant Capacity and Phenols of White Tea: Relationship with Sensory Properties of the Article. Food Chemistry, 248, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, Y.K., Giménez, R., Rufián-Henares, J.A. and Pastoriza, S. (2015) Familiarity and Liking Playing a Role on the Perception of Trained Panelists: A Cross-Cultural Study on Teas. Food Research International, 71, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.03.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, J., et al. (2010) Consumer Acceptance for Green Tea by Consumers in the United States, Korea and Thailand. Journal of Sensory Studies, 25, 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00287.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Narukawa, M., Kimata, H., Noga, C. and Watanabe, T. (2010) Taste Characterisation of Green Tea Catechins. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 45, 1579-1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02304.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castiglioni, S., Damiani, E., Astolfi, P. and Carloni, P. (2015) Influence of Steeping Conditions (Time, Temperature, and Particle Size) on Antioxidant Properties and Sensory Attributes of Some White and Green Teas. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 66, 491-497. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2015.1042842</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maaroufi, C., et al. (2000) Fractionation of Pea Flour with Pilot Scale Sieving. I. Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Pea Seed Fractions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 85, 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00127-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monobe, M., Ema, K., Tokuda, Y. and Maeda-Yamamoto, M. (2010) Effect on the Epigallocatechin Gallate/Epigallocatechin Ratio in a Green Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Extract of Different Extraction Temperatures and Its Effect on IgA Production in Mice. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 74, 2501-2503. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.100498</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, C., Suen, C.L.C., Yang, C. and Quek, S.Y. (2018) Antioxidant Capacity and Major Polyphenol Composition of Teas as Affected by Geographical Location, Plantation Elevation and Leaf Grade. Food Chemistry, 244, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yanagimoto, K., Ochi, H., Lee, K.G. and Shibamoto, T. (2003) Antioxidative Activities of Volatile Extracts from Green Tea, Oolong Tea, and Black Tea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 7396-7401. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030127i</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumazawa, K., Kubota, K. and Masuda, H. (2005) Influence of Manufacturing Conditions and Crop Season on the Formation of 4-Mercapto-4-Methyl-2-Pentanone in Japanese Green Tea (Sen-Cha). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 5390-5396. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf050392z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mizukami, Y. (2015) Odor Characteristics of Green Tea. Journal of Japan Association on Odor Environment, 46, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.2171/jao.46.110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, L., et al. (2020) Association between Chemistry and Taste of Tea: A Review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 101, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaneko, S., et al. (2006) Molecular and Sensory Studies on the Umami Taste of Japanese Green Tea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 2688-2694. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0525232</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, J., Chen, Y. and Ni, D. (2012) Effect of Superfine Grinding on Quality and Antioxidant Property of Fine Green Tea Powders. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 45, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.08.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alam, M., Ali, S., Ashraf, G.M., Bilgrami, A.L., Yadav, D.K. and Hassan, M.I. (2022) Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate: From Green Tea to Cancer Therapeutics. Food Chemistry, 379, Article Number 132135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murase, T., Nagasawa, A., Suzuki, J., Hase, T. and Tokimitsu, I. (2002) Beneficial Effects of Tea Catechins on Diet-Induced Obesity: Stimulation of Lipid Catabolism in the Liver. International Journal of Obesit, 26, 1459-1464. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujimura, Y., et al. (2002) Antiallergic Tea Catechin, (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-O- (3-O-Methyl)-Gallate, Suppresses FcεRI Expression in Human Basophilic KU812 Cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 5729-5734. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025680z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tachibana, H., Koga, K., Fujimura, Y. and Yamada, K. (2004) A Receptor for Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG. Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology, 11, 380-381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsukamoto, S., et al. (2012) Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG Induces Lipid-Raft Clustering and Apoptotic Cell Death by Activating Protein Kinase Cδ and Acid Sphingomyelinase through a 67 kDa Laminin Receptor in Multiple Myeloma Cells. Biochemical Journal, 443, 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20111837</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hong Byun, E., Fujimura, Y., Yamada, K. and Tachibana, H. (2010) TLR4 Signaling Inhibitory Pathway Induced by Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate through 67-kDa Laminin Receptor. The Journal of Immunology, 185, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903742</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Umeda, D., Yano, S., Yamad, K. and Tachibana, H. (2008) Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Signaling Pathway through 67-kDa Laminin Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 3050-3058. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M707892200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Byun, E.H., Omura, T., Yamada, K. and Tachibana, H. (2011) Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Inhibits TLR2 Signaling Induced by Peptidoglycan through the Polyphenol Sensing Molecule 67-kDa Laminin Receptor. FEBS Letters, 585, 814-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.02.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129293-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, S.M., Lee, H.S., Kim, K.H. and Kim, K.O. (2009) Sensory Characteristics and Consumer Acceptability of Decaffeinated Green Teas. Journal of Food Science, 74, S135-S141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01100.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>