<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2023.1111017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-129126</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Cytotoxicity of Cholesterol Oxides and the Consequences of Relative Molecular Similarity to cGMP Nucleotide
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wynford</surname><given-names>Robert Williams</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Faculty of Life Sciences &amp;amp; Education, University of South Wales, Cardiff, UK</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>190</fpage><lpage>207</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Cholesterol and cholesterol oxides impact on the functional properties of cells, in respect of the intracellular and extracellular distribution of compounds across cell membranes, carcinogenesis and drug resistance. Abnormal levels of cholesterol oxides and steroids in cancerous tissues promote interest in steroid receptor cross-talk during cell-signalling and the steroid metabolome of cancer patients. The research literature links the cytotoxic properties of oxysterols to interference with the NO/cGMP pathway. cGMP participates in cell-signalling and has a molecular structure that relates to cancer-inducing and cancer-preventing agents. This study uses a molecular modelling approach to compare the structures of cholesterol oxides to cGMP. Cholesterol and cholesterol oxide structures fit to a cGMP structural template in several ways, some of which are replicated by corticosteroids and gonadal steroid hormones. The results of this study support the concept that cholesterol oxides modulate cell apoptosis and autophagy via the NO/cGMP pathway and in conjunction with steroid hormones participate in modulating regulation of cell function by cGMP.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cholesterol Oxides</kwd><kwd> cGMP</kwd><kwd> Oxysterols</kwd><kwd> Molecular Similarity</kwd><kwd> Apoptosis</kwd><kwd> Autophagy</kwd><kwd> Cancer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Several major diseases are attributed to the malfunction of cell mitochondria, endoplasmic reticula and the cell membrane transport proteins that keep the intracellular environment in a state of functional homeostasis. Cholesterol, the precursor of steroid hormones, bile acids and oxysterols, dictates fluidity and permeability within the cell membrane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref1">1</xref>] . Modulation of the cholesterol component of the cell membrane influences the conformation and ATPase activity of P-glycoprotein (MDR1), the ATP-dependent membrane efflux pump [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref2">2</xref>] . Cholesterol accumulation and oxysterol synthesis within mitochondria decrease the opening-sensitivity of the permeability transition pore [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref3">3</xref>] . Desensitisation of transporter mechanisms within cells and mitochondria generates pro-apoptotic oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction of relevance to the development of diabetes and cancer, and cancer pharmacology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Investigations of cholesterol as a risk factor in malignancy are complicated by its precursor role and widespread distribution in many chemical forms. Studies on cholesterol oxysterols have demonstrated the promotion of various cancers, pro-apoptotic and cytotoxic effects on tumour cells, and interaction with chemotherapy and steroid hormone receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref7">7</xref>] . Cell membrane (GPCR) and nuclear receptors (LXR) exist for oxysterols and may participate in the promotion of apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref8">8</xref>] . In endothelial and blood monocyte cultures, the apoptosis-inducing activities of 7β-hydroxycholesterol (7β-HC) and 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC) are rated as greater than those of 25-HC and 5,6-epoxycholesterol (5,6-EC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref10">10</xref>] . Cytotoxic concentrations of these oxysterols induce oxiapoptophagy: ROS (reactive oxygen species) associated cell death with the characteristics of apoptosis and autophagy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref12">12</xref>] . Lethal autophagy is another description of cell death attributed to cholesterol metabolites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref13">13</xref>] . A wide range of small molecular weight compounds of natural and synthetic origin protect against the cytotoxicity of oxysterols in cell culture. Such compounds include vitamin E (α-tocopherol), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), ascorbic acid, biotin and methylfumarate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Nucleotide dependent enzyme pathways are integral to cell-signalling and there is considerable interest in the manipulation of tumour cGMP levels to improve outcomes in vitro and in clinical settings. cGMP modulates cell ROS and SOCE (store-operated calcium entry), nucleotide binding domains (NBDs), tumour cell apoptosis, autophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref19">19</xref>] . The presence of cGMP binding sites on multi-drug resistant proteins (MRPs) links the nucleotide to the development of chemotherapy resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref20">20</xref>] . Some cancer patients receive cGMP-targeted phosphodiesterase medication, although there is considerable debate on the therapeutic value of the nucleotide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref21">21</xref>] . A similarly confusing picture is characteristic of in vitro studies on the role of cGMP. Individual cell apoptosis-modulating agents including carcinogens, chemotherapy drugs, endogenous hormones and phytochemicals both induce and protect against apoptosis. Such contradictory findings may relate to the molecular similarity of these compounds relative to the nucleotide. The alternative in-silico fits of their molecular structures to a cGMP structural template may demonstrate their propensity for engaging with alternative biochemical pathways at NBDs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>The major role of cGMP in maintaining mechanisms of cell homeostasis generates interest in the capacity of steroid hormones and endogenous sterols to directly influence functional properties of the nucleotide and promote cytotoxicity, as a consequence of altered nucleotide: steroid ratios within cells. The potential for molecular interaction may be evident within compound structures as relative molecular similarity in comparison to the nucleotide; data that may contribute to a better understanding of the impact of biochemical defects within cells and identify compounds suitable for therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate and report on nucleotide relative molecular similarity within the structures of cholesterol, oxysterols, and the compounds modulating their apoptotic and autophagic properties.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Compound Structures</title><p>The compounds selected for investigation are primarily oxysterol compounds identified in cancer patient tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref7">7</xref>] and the above small molecular weight inhibitors of oxysterol cytotoxicity. Compounds structures are taken from the PubChem website (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Molecular Modelling</title><p>The Nemesis software program (Oxford Molecular version 2.1) is used to build compound structures from the program fragment file and minimise energy values by conformational analysis. The molecular structures used for fitting are minimum energy conformers in an uncharged form. The conformation of the cGMP structure is described by the torsion angle (bond angle formed by 4 adjacent atoms) C8N9C1’O9-33˚ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The Nemesis program fits paired molecular structures on a three-point basis. Fitting-points, comprised of atoms of similar type and partial charge within compound and nucleotide structures, are identified in the text and table with respect to the nucleotide labels. Colour-coded atoms in the figures identify ligand fitting-points: carbon-green, nitrogen-blue, oxygen-red, sulphur-yellow. Bond order within the molecular structures is not shown to improve on presentation. The Nemesis program computes goodness-of-fit values, in respect of inter-atomic distance at each fitting-point and root mean square (RMS) value. The sequence of fitting points (given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, left to right) provides the fit with the lowest RMS value.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> gives six fits of the cholesterol structure (templates 2 - 7) on the cGMP structure (template 1) which all have fitting-points on the purine and ribose-phosphate moieties of the nucleotide. These fits are similar in respect of goodness-of-fit values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The common sterol core structure of 4 cyclic rings (template 2) enables oxysterol structures, such as 25-HC and 27-HC, to replicate the fits of cholesterol; template 2 and 3 fits are also given by testosterone and template 4 by estradiol (not shown). The keto group of 7-KC (8 and 9) contributes to more exclusive fits, with template 8 using the same fitting points as the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin (12). Apoptosis inhibitory compounds, ascorbic acid (10) and dimethylfumarate (11) fit to the ribose-phosphate moiety of cGMP occluding the nucleotide cyclised ring. The O5 lactone ring fit of withaferin A (13), a herbal medicine, contributes to the limited superimposition of this structure on the nucleotide template.</p><p>Cholesterol oxides with side-chain C20, C22 and C24 hydroxyl groups target O6, O7 and O8 fitting-points on the cGMP template (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) which are not available to the cholesterol structure; 20α-HC fits at O6 and O8, 22(R)-HC and 24(S)-HC at O7 and O8 respectively. Also given are the fits of cholesterol 5,6-epoxide (5) and metabolites of the epoxide: cholestane-3β,5α,6β-triol (6) (cholestane-triol) and tumour promoter 6-oxo-cholestan-3β,5α-diol (OCDO) (7). The cholestane-triol fit is also given by 11-ketotestosterone (not shown). Dendrogenin (8) is an epoxide metabolite derived by enzymatic conjugation with histamine. Two fits of the LXR agonist and androgen receptor antagonist T0901317 are given (9, 10). Of the T0901317 fits, template 10 is more similar to the fit of 22(R)-HC; both LXR agonists induce apoptosis in a similar manner.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Values for fitting compound structures to the cGMP template</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compounds</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fitting points</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Interatomic distances (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RMS (&#197;)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3-methyladenine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O6C5C8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02, 0.03, 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0067</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3-methyladenosine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C1’N7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01, 0.02, 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0048</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3-methyladenosine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N7C8O7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09, 0.05, 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5,6α-epoxide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4O8C3’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05, 0.06, 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0225</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7-ketocholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1’C2C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02, 0.06, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0086</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7-ketocholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4C4’C1’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11, 0.10, 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0084</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17β-estradiol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O3C1’C4’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10, 0.03, 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0024</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20αHC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C3’O6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14, 0.14, 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20αHC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O6C6O8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08, 0.11, 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0024</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22(R)HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4C1’O7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04, 0.06, 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0093</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24(S)HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C8C2’O7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02, 0.12, 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0102</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4C1’C3’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03, 0.06, 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0117</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-tocopherol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’O9O8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0,12, 0.08, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0201</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ascorbic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C2’O3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07, 0.07, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0027</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >betulinic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C2’C1N9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09, 0.05, 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0205</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >betulinic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O7C4’C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08, 0.10, 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0073</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >betulinic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C2’N1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09, 0.06, 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0072</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >biotin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O9C4’O8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.11, 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bufalin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C2O7C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07, 0.08, 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bufalin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C2O7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14, 0.04, 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0060</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholestane-triol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O8C3’C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.08, 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0184</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C2’C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09, 0.04, 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0054</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C1’C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11, 0.09, 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’C2’C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05, 0.09, 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0141</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C2’C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10, 0.07, 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’C1’C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05, 0.06, 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0176</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4’C1’C8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07, 0.03, 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cortisol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C5C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08, 0.04, 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0065</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cortisol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4C1’C3’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05, 0.07, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0180</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cycloheximide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’C2’C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04, 0.09, 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0076</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cytosine arabinoside</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’C4’C8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01, 0.01, 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >dendrogenin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C5C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14, 0.08, 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0150</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DHEA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4C1’C3’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04, 0.06, 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0101</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >diethylstilbestrol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O3C1’C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.05, 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >dimethylfumarate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O2C3’O5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03, 0.09, 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0028</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >diosgenin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O8C3’C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.07, 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >docosahexaenoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O7O5C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13, 0.11, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0090</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >doxorubicin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1’C2C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.06, 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >fenoldopam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N1C4O3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10, 0.13, 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >fulvestrant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4C3C1’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07, 0.09, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0151</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >lumisterol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C5C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07, 0.06, 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >mifepristone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C5C4C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10, 0.12, 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0143</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCDO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’C2’C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14, 0.13, 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0182</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCDO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C5C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14, 0.08, 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0153</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QW-1624F2-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C5C4O7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08, 0.07, 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >riociguat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O6C6C7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.07, 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0047</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >staurosporine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C1’C8C2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03, 0.05, 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0048</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0901317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O9C8C2’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11, 0.08, 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0034</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0901317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3’C1’C5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05, 0.03, 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >tadalafil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N7C8C4’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10, 0.10, 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0143</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >tesmilifene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O3C3’C6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05, 0.02, 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vitamin D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C5C4C7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07, 0.07, 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vitamin D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C8N9O7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10, 0.11, 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0064</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >withaferin A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C6C2O5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14, 0.04, 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0073</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The template fits of cortisol (1) and OCDO (2) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> are the same as that given by dendrogenin in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. OCDO binds to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and shares this property, and similar nucleotide template fit, with the anti-progesterone mifepristone (3). The C4C1’C3’ fits of structures 4, 5 and 8 are replicated by cholesterol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and differ from those given by estradiol (6) and diethylstilbestrol (7). A more exclusive fit of DHEA (9) is not available to cholesterol-based compounds lacking an oxygen substituent. The molecular structures of DHEA and estradiol are very similar; in comparison to the estradiol fit (6) the structure of DHEA (9) is inverted. Diosgenin (10), a commercial source of DHEA, superimposes along the C6-O8 axis of the cGMP template.</p><p>Molecular structures of the pentacyclic triterpenoid betulinic acid and buffalin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) also superimpose along the length of the cGMP template. Bufalin (4)</p><p>has a similar template fit to withaferin A (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). An additional fit of betulinic acid with an O7 fitting-point (C6C4’O7) is not shown as the C6 fitting distance (0.17 &#197;) is rather high (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Biotin (5) is a compound that shares antioxidant properties with alpha-tocopherol (6) and DHA (7). Neither biotin or alpha-tocopherol have fitting-points on the nucleotide purine ring. Tesmilifene (8) a novel potentiator of chemotherapy, displays a unique nucleotide template fit. Structural analogues of vitamin D (9, 10) include compound QW-1624F2-2 (11) and the ring-closed structure of lumisterol (12) which provides the cortisol fit given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> includes the structures of compounds in clinical use that increase cGMP levels (1, 2, 3) or find use as pro-apoptotic anti-tumour agents (4, 5, 6). Fenoldopam, tadalafil and riociguat respectively have properties of a peripheral dopamine agonist, PDE5 inhibitor and anti-hypertensive activator of guanylyl cyclase. Minimum energy conformers of the three drugs demonstrate relative molecular similarity to the structure of cGMP, their pharmacological effector molecule. The fits of the three pro-apoptotic structures leave the nucleotide cyclised ring unobstructed. In contrast to some of the above structures that superimpose over the length of the nucleotide template, derivatives of adenine (7, 8, 9) with properties of autophagy inhibition share a preference for the purine ring.</p><p>Nucleotide template fitting-values given in Figures 1-5 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) range from 0.01 - 0.14 &#197; (interatomic distance) and 0.001 - 0.0225 &#197; (RMS value).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Cholesterol provides the core ring structure of steroid hormones and identifies with the structure of cGMP, as illustrated by the cholesterol superimposed nucleotide templates, in respect of molecular size and specific intra-atomic distances. The cholesterol fits are replicated by DHEA, a compound with the property of alleviating oxidative-stress and apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref24">24</xref>] and a potent inhibitor of prostate and mammary gland cancer in the rat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref25">25</xref>] . Some template fits of the cholesterol structure are also replicated by cortisol, testosterone and estradiol. Although cholesterol is not a compound with solely benign effects on cell function, cholesterol oxides have a greater capacity for rendering cells dysfunctional via modulation of oxidative stress mechanisms, mitochondrial function and MRPs. The effects of 27-HC on cells include autophagy induction in promonocytic cultures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref26">26</xref>] , ROS-linked apoptosis in haematopoietic cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref27">27</xref>] , decreased colon cancer cell proliferation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref28">28</xref>] and block of docetaxel-induced prostate epithelial cell apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref29">29</xref>] . 27-HC is a selective modulator of estrogen receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref27">27</xref>] . The anti-proliferative effects of 22(R)-HC and 24(S)-HC on breast and prostate cancer cell-lines are also mediated by the AR antagonist T0901317 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref30">30</xref>] . All three afore-mentioned compounds are LXR (liver X receptor) agonists, which induce expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters involved in cholesterol efflux, promoting reduced intracellular cholesterol levels and cell proliferation, and stimulation of apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref31">31</xref>] . Although 22(R)-HC and T0901317 structures do not have identical nucleotide template fitting-points their relative molecular similarity to cGMP may be sufficient to modulate cGMP function in the same way. Oxygen and hydroxyl substituents on the core steroid ring structure enable additional fits to the nucleotide template, unavailable to cholesterol and oxysterols with side-chain substituents, and may provide greater affinity to protein receptors of cGMP. 7-KC and cholestane-triol both promote LXR agonist-induced apoptosis of breast and prostate cancer cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref8">8</xref>] whereas cholangocytes cultured in low concentrations of cholestane-triol become resistant to hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>The impact of oxysterols on NO/cGMP biochemistry is evident in studies which have evaluated the cytotoxicity of 7-KC, 25-HC and cholestane-triol on red blood cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref35">35</xref>] . The small molecular weight compounds (biotin, vitamin C, α-tocopherol, dimethylfumarate and DHA) that protect against the cytotoxic effects of oxysterols are, in terms of structure, very different in comparison to the oxysterols and each other but not in respect of relative molecular similarity to cGMP. The effects of α-tocopherol and biotin on oxidative stress have been attributed to protection of the redox state of guanylate cyclase and influence on the protein kinase G pathway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref37">37</xref>] . DHA induces production of endothelial cell nitric oxide (NO) and the expression of genes associated with down-regulation of PDE5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref39">39</xref>] . α-tocopherol, DHA and dimethylfumarate prevent the cytotoxicity induced in cell cultures by 7-KC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Studies on murine oligodendrocyte death induced by 7β-HC demonstrate attenuation of impaired mitochondrial function and dysfunctional lipid metabolism by biotin, DHA and α-tocopherol [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref17">17</xref>] . Several earlier studies established a relationship between vitamin D and cGMP through the investigation of guanylyl cyclase activation. Barsony and Marx [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref40">40</xref>] describe the rapid accumulation of intracellular cGMP in dermal fibroblasts near activated vitamin D receptors. The accumulation of vitamin D and cGMP, in response to adrenocorticosteroids, correlated with GR binding-affinity. Vitamin D induces autophagy with inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis in pancreatic beta-cells and breast cancer cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref42">42</xref>] . Supplementation with the vitamin, in the clinical setting, may improve the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic drugs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>Several larger compound structures (diosgenin, betulinic acid, bufalin, withaferin A) with template fits that span the length of the nucleotide structure are recognised for their lethal autophagy properties. The generation of ROS and JNK activation by bufalin, a β-hydroxy steroid, induces apoptosis and autophagy in a number of tumour cell lines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref44">44</xref>] . Betulinic acid, another compound with apoptotic and autophagic means of inducing cell death has an affinity for estrogen receptors (ER) and stimulates NO generation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref45">45</xref>] . Diosgenin inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation by inducing autophagy and apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref46">46</xref>] . There are, however, some concerns that the cell apoptosis observed when autophagy is inhibited by chemotherapy, radiation, or compounds such as 3-methyladenine and 3-methyladenosine, may not be autophagy related [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref48">48</xref>] . Tesmilifene-induced apoptosis of MDR cells, associated with increased superoxide and reduced ATP levels, enhances the cytotoxicity of several chemotherapeutic drugs in vitro and in vivo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref49">49</xref>] .</p><p>The anti-myeloma activity of cholesterol 5,6-epoxide is attributed to oxiapoptophagy; metabolism to OCDO stimulates breast cancer cell growth via GR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref50">50</xref>] . Tumour cell proliferation by OCDO, present in higher concentrations in breast cancer tissue, is inhibited by mifepristone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref51">51</xref>] . Dendrogenin, a non canonical LXR ligand, degrades hydrogen peroxide and cholesterol 5,6-epoxides via catalase stimulation and lethal autophagy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref52">52</xref>] . The nucleotide templates demonstrate the same fit for cortisol, OCDO, mifepristone and dendrogenin. Recent clinical studies question the balance of corticosteroid treatment effects in breast cancer. Cortisol treatment of ER+ tumours is associated with reduced cell proliferation, whereas cortisol inhibition of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis may promote the development and metastasis of ER− tumours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref53">53</xref>] . Hydroxycholesterol template fits are replicated by cortisol, progesterone and testosterone, and the dendrogenin fit is replicated by cortisol and progesterone. Additional pro- and anti-apoptotic nucleotide template fits of cortisol, progesterone and testosterone are given in a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref54">54</xref>] .</p><p>Following a systematic review of steroid metabolism in cancers, Anh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref55">55</xref>] identified estradiol, DHEA, cortisol and estrogen metabolites as oncosteroids. The significance of steroid receptors in cancer subtypes is receiving more attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref56">56</xref>] following recognition that ratios of cancer promoting and inhibitory steroids and their metabolites may determine the status and progression of tumours. There is extensive steroid crosstalk between receptors (GR, ER, PR, AR) during cell-signalling. GR recognises glucocorticoid and progesterone structures with similar affinity, whereas AR binds to the ER element with an antagonistic effect on estrogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref53">53</xref>] . GR has a tumour suppressive role in attenuating AR dependent transcription in prostate cancer. Following an investigation of a substantial metabolome of 36 urinary metabolites in patients with a familial risk of breast cancer, Houghton et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref57">57</xref>] identified six glucocorticoids associated with an increased risk (49% - 161%), including tetrahydrocortisone (THE) and tetrahydrocortisol (THF). Androsterone (AN) and 11-hydroxy-androsterone (11OHAN) were associated respectively with increased risks of 70% and 90%, whereas E1and E2 reduced breast cancer risk. The results are indicative of raised androsterone and cortisol levels in breast cancer patients, as glucocorticoids are all cortisol derived. In regard to the present study, THE and THF structures provide the same <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> cortisol fit, as the steroid A ring is not involved in template fitting. THE and THF structures are not able to replicate cortisol template fits that use the oxygen fitting-points demonstrated in a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref54">54</xref>] . Cortisol, DHEA, AN and 11OHAN replicate the template fits of cholesterol (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, templates 3 and 7); template fit 7 is also given by 11-ketotestosterone.</p><p>Research literature documenting the role of cGMP in the transformation of healthy cells into cancerous tissue is limited and confusing. PDE5 inhibitors increase intracellular cGMP by blocking enzymatic hydrolysis of the nucleotide and ABCC5-mediated efflux, producing favourable conditions for the promotion of tumour cell apoptosis and reduced growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref58">58</xref>] . On the other hand, in vitro studies report that the NO/cGMP pathway attenuates apoptosis in beta-cells, neuronal cells and prostate cancer stem cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref61">61</xref>] . cGMP age-related disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis is also evident in rats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref62">62</xref>] . Breast cancer studies demonstrate the benefits of dopamine and D1R agonists in controlling aggressive tumour cells, in vitro and in mouse models, via the cGMP/PKG pathway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref63">63</xref>] . Stehle et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref21">21</xref>] implicate the heterogeneity within tumour cell cGMP signalling, attributable to tumour cell type and environment, for contributing to the contradictory results of cancer therapy. A similarly confusing picture is encountered in vitro, as the same compounds are reported to possess both positive and negative effects on cell apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129126-ref22">22</xref>] . Some variability may be explained by the chemical milieux within which experimental studies are undertaken. Lipids, steroids and other cell products may interfere with agents under investigation, an even more complex problem for studies in vivo. Another factor is the assumed nature of an effector agent; for example, a PDE antagonist or dopamine agonist may not necessarily work on the basis of their known properties but on the basis of their molecular structures. A limitation of the present study is that goodness-of-fit values do not provide evidence of pharmacological affinity and in this respect it is difficult to identify the importance of comparative structures for a cGMP binding site, for example cholesterol versus oxysterols structures with ring or side-chain oxygens. A central role for cGMP in the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy is evident, however, from the observation that so many endogenous and exogenous modulators demonstrate relative molecular similarity to the nucleotide structure. Many of these compounds are unlikely to satisfy the enzyme, MDR, ion-channel and conformational change-mediated functions of the nucleotide.</p><p>The compound structures linked to the modulation of apoptosis and autophagy processes demonstrate characterisic nucleotide template fitting patterns. The fitting pattern is simplest for the above small molecular weight inhibitors of apoptosis that block the nucleotide cyclised ring. In contrast stimulators of apoptosis fit without blocking the cyclised ring, as is evident for the template fits of hydroxycholesterol compounds in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> (templates 1 - 4) and the pro-apoptotic structures in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Autophagy inhibitors, 3-methyladenine and 3-methyladenosine have a fitting preference for the nucleotide guanine ring. The stimulators of autophagy and lethal autophagy (diosgenin, betulinic acid, bufalin, withaferin A, dendrogenin) relate to the complete nucleotide structure and in vivo may be able to displace or replace the nucleotide completely. Many compounds provide several different fits of one minimum energy structure to the cGMP nucleotide template. Extension of this observation to cell nucleotide receptors may explain how such compounds induce alternative biochemical and bi-functional changes, via activation of different cell pathways. The additive and allosteric effects of compounds on apoptosis and autophagy processes through binding to NBD sites is of relevance to the study of drug resistance. Finally, this study places cholesterol oxides on an extensive list of tumour cell growth modulators that demonstrate relative molecular similarity to the cGMP structure.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Williams, W.R. (2023) Cytotoxicity of Cholesterol Oxides and the Consequences of Relative Molecular Similarity to cGMP Nucleotide. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 11, 190-207. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2023.1111017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129126-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Centonze, G., Natalini, D., Piccolantonio, A., Salemme, V., Morellato, A., Arina, P., Riganti, C. and Defilippi, P. (2022) Cholesterol and Its Derivatives: Multifaceted Players in Breast Cancer Progression. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article 906670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.906670</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tran, N.N.B., Bui, A.T.A., Jaramillo-Martinez, V., Weber, J., Zhang, Q. and Urbatsch, I.L. (2023) Lipid Environment Determines the Drug-Stimulated ATPase Activity of P-Glycoprotein. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 10, Article 1141081. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1141081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia-Ruiz, C., De la Rosa, C.L., Ribas, V. and Fernandez-Checha, J.C. (2021) Mitochondrial Cholesterol and Cancer. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 73, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.07.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J., Kong, F., Pan, Q., Du, Y., Ye, J., Zheng, F., Li, H. and Zhou, J. (2017) Autophagy Protects against Cholesterol-Induced Apoptosis in Pancreatic β-Cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 482, 678-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.11.093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nazih, H. and Bard, J.M. (2020) Cholesterol, Oxysterols and LXRs in Breast Cancer Pathophysiology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041356</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kloudova-Spalenkova, A., Holy, P. and Soucek, P. (2020) Oxysterols in Cancer Management: From Therapy to Biomarkers. British Journal of Pharmacology, 178, 3235-3247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Freitas, F.A., Levy, D., Zarrouk, A., Lizard, G. and Bydlowski, S.P. (2021) Impact of Oxysterols on Cell Death, Proliferation, and Differentiation Induction: Current Status. Cells, 20, Article 2301. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levy, D., De Melo, T.C., Oliveira, B.A., Paz, J.L., De Freitas, F.A., Reichert, C.O., Rodrigues, A.R. and Bydlowski, S.P. (2019) 7-Ketocholesterol and Cholestane-Triol Increase Expression of SMO and LXRα Signaling Pathways in a Human Breast Cancer Cell Line. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 19, Article ID: 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2018.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lizard, G., Deckert, V., Dubrez, L., Moisant, M., Gambert, P. and Lagrost, L. (1996) Induction of Apoptosis in Endothelial Cells Treated with Cholesterol Oxides. American Journal of Pathology, 148, 1625-1638.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Callaghan, Y.C., Woods J.A. and O’Brien, N.M. (2001) Comparative Study of the Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis-Inducing Potential of Commonly Occurring Oxysterols. Cell Biology and Toxicology, 17, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010914306375</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nury, T., Zarrouk, A., Yammine, A., Mackrill, J.J., Vejux, A. and Lizard, G. (2020) Oxiapoptophagy: A Type of Cell Death Induced by Some Oxysterols. British Journal of Pharmacology, 178, 3115-3123. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaouadi, O., Limam, I., Abdelkarim, M., Berred, E., Chahbi, A., Caillot, M., Sola, B. and Aissa-Fennira, F.B. (2021) 5,6-Epoxycholesterol Isomers Induce Oxiapoptophagy in Myeloma Cells. Cancers, 13, Article 3747. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poirot, M. and Silvente-Poirot, S. (2018) The Tumour-Supressor Cholesterol Metabolite, Dendrogenin A, Is a New Class of LXR Modulator Activating Lethal Autophagy in Cancers. Biochemical Pharmacology, 153, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2018.01.046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brahami, F., Vejux, A., Sghaier, R., Zarrouk, A., Nury, T., Meddeb, W., Rezig, L., Namsi, A., Sassi, K., Yammine, A., Badreddine, I., Vervandier-Fasseur, D., Madani, K., Boulekbache-Makhlouf, L., Nasser, B. and Lizard, G. (2019) Prevention of 7-Ketocholesterol-Induced Side Effects by Natural Compounds. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59, 3179-3198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1491828</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zarrouk, A., Nury, T., Samadi, M., O’Callaghan, Y., Hammami, M., O’Brien, N.M., Lizard, G. and Mackrill, J.J. (2015) Effects of Cholesterol Oxides on Cell Death Induction and Calcium Increase in Human Neuronal Cells (SK-N-BE) and Evaluation of the Protective Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA; C22:6n-3). Steroids, 99, 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2015.01.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roussi, S., Gosse, F., Aoude-Werner, D., Zhang, X., Marchioni, E., Geoffroy, P., Miesch, M. and Raul, F. (2007) Mitochondrial Perturbation, Oxidative Stress and Lysosomal Destabilization Are Involved in 7β-Hydroxycholesterol and 7β-Hydroxycholesterol Triggered Apoptosis in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Comparative Study, 12, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-0485-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sghaier, R., Zarrouk, A., Nury, T., Badreddine, L., O’Brien, N., Mackrill, J.J., Vejux, A., Samadi, M., Nasser, B., Caccia, C., Leoni, V., Moreau, T., Cherkaoui-Malki, M., Masmoudi, A.S. and Lizard, G. (2019) Biotin Attenuation of Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Lipid Metabolism Alteration and 7β-Hydroxycholesterol-Induced Cell Death in 158N Murine Oligodendrocytes. Free Radical Research, 53, 535-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715762.2019.1612891</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sghaier, R., Nury, T., Leoni, V., Caccia, C., De Barros, J.P.P., Cherif, A., Vejux, A., Moreau, T., Limem, K., Samadi, M., Mackrill, J.J. Masmoudi, A.S., Lizard, G. and Zarrouk, A. (2019) Dimethyl Fumarate and Monomethyl Fumarate Attenuate Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Alterations Leading to Oxiapoptophagy in 158 Murine Oligodendrocytes Treated with 7β-Hydroxycholesterol. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 194, Article ID: 105432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105432</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, W.R. (2020) Tumour Initiation, Store-Operated Calcium Entry (SOCE) and Apoptosis: Cyclic Nucleotide Dependence. General Physiology and Biophysics, 39, 419-435. https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2020020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Honorat, M., Terreux, R., Falson, P., Di Petro, A., Dumontet, C. and Payen, L. (2013) Localization of Putative Binding Sites for Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate and the Anti-Cancer Drug 5-Fluoro-2’-Deoxyuridine-5’-Monophosphate on ABCC11 in Silico Models. BMC Structural Biology, 13, Article No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-13-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stehle, D., Barresi, M., Schulz, J. and Feil, R. (2023) Heterogeneity of cGMP Signalling in Tumour Cells and the Tumour Microenvironment: Challenges and Chances for Cancer Pharmacology. Journal of Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics, 242, Article ID: 108337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, W.R. (2021) Cyclic Nucleotide Structural Differentiation of Compounds Modulating Apoptosis and Drug Resistance. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 9, 10-28.https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2021.98002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kilanczyk, E., Ruminkiewicz, D., Banales, J.M., Milkiewicz, P. and Milkiewicz, M. (2022) DHEA Protects Human Cholangiocytes and Hepatocytes against Apoptosis and Oxidative Stress. Cells, 11, Article 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11061038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ding, X., Yu, L., Ge, C. and Ma, H. (2017) Protective Effect of DHEA on Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Primary Rat Leydig Cells. Oncotarget, 8, 16158-16169. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCormick, D.L., Johnson, W.D., Kozub, N.M., Rao, K.V.N., Lubet, R.A., Steele, V.E. and Bosland, M.C. (2007) Chemoprevention of Rat Prostate Carcinogenesis by Dietary 16α-Fluoro5-Androsten-17-One (Fluasterone), a Minimally Androgenic Analog of Dehydroepiandrosterone. Carcinogenesis, 28, 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgl141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vurusaner, B., Gargiulo, S., Testa, G., Gamba, P., Leonarduzzi, G., Poli, G. and Basaga, H. (2018) The Role of Autophagy in Survival Response Induced by 27-Hydroxycholesterol in Human Promonocytic Cells. Redox Biology, 17, 400-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.05.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woo, S.Y., Lee, H., Park, S.M., Choi, H.S., Kim, J., Kwon, M., Sohn, J., Nam, J.H., Kim, H.S., Song, P., Baryawno, N., Kim, Y.H., Kim, K. and Lee, D. (2022) Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Regulating 27-Hydroxycholesterol-Induced Apoptosis of Haematopoietic Progenitor Cells and Myeloid Cell Lines. Cell Death and Diseases, 13, Article No. 916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05360-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warns, J., Marwarha, G., Freking, N. and Ghribi, O. (2018) 27-Hydroxycholesterol Decreases Cell Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cell Lines. Biochimie, 153, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2018.07.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raza, S., Meyer, M., Schommer, J., Hammer, K.D.P., Guo, B. and Ghribi, O. (2016) 27-Hydroxycholesterol Stimulates Cell Proliferation and Resistance to Docetaxel-Induced Apoptosis in Prostate Epithelial Cells. Medical Oncology, 33, Article No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0725-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chuu, C.P. and Lin, H.P. (2010) Antiproliferative Effect of LXR Agonists T0901317 and 22(R)-Hydroxycholesterol on Multiple Human Cancer Cell Lines. Anticancer Research, 30, 3643-3648.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roz, A.E., Bard, J.M., Huvelin, J.M. and Nazih, H. (2012) LXR Agonists and ABCG1-Dependent Cholesterol Efflux in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells: Relation to Proliferation and Apoptosis. Anticancer Research, 32, 3007-3013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jusakul, A., Loilome, W., Namwat, N., Techasen, A., Kuver, R., Ioannou, G.N., Savard, C., Haigh, W.G. and Yongvanit, P. (2013) Anti-Apoptotic Phenotypes of Cholestan-3β,5α,6β-Triol-Resistant Human Cholangiocytes: Characteristics to the Genesis of Cholangiocarcinoma. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 138, 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Attanzio, A., Frazzitta, A., Cilla, A., Livrea, M.A., Tesoriere, L. and Allegra, M. (2019) 7-Keto-Cholesterol-3β,5α,6β-Triol Induce Eryptosis through Distinct Pathways Leading to NADPH Oxidase and Nitric Oxide Synthetase Activation. Cell Physiology and Biochemistry, 53, 933-947. https://doi.org/10.33594/000000186</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">You, J.S., Lim, H., Seo, J.Y., Kang, K.R., Kim, D.K., Oh, J.S., Seo, Y.S., Lee, G.J., Kim, J.S., Kim, H.J., Yu, S.K. and Kim, J.S. (2021) 25-Hydroxycholesterol-Induced Oxiapoptophagy in L929 Mouse Fibroblast Cell Line. Molecules, 27, Article 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010199</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ou, Z.J., Chen, J., Dai, W.P., Liu, X., Yang, Y.K., Li, Y., Lin, Z.B., Wang, T.T., Wu, Y.Y., Su, D.H., Cheng, T., Wang, Z.P., Tao, J. and Ou, J.S. (2016) 25-Hydroxycholesterol Impairs Endothelial Function and Vasodilation by Uncoupling and Inhibiting Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase. American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 311, E781-E790. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00218.2016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tawa, M. and Okamura, T. (2016) Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Redox State under Oxidative Stress Conditions in Isolated Monkey Coronary Arteries. Pharmacology Research Perspectives, 16, e00261. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riveron-Negrete, L. and Fernadez-Mejia, C. (2017) Pharmacological Effects of Biotin in Animals. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 17, 529-540. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557516666160923132611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamagata, K. (2017) Docosahexaenoic Acid Regulates Vascular Endothelial Cell Function and Prevents Cardiovascular Disease. Lipids in Health and Disease, 16, Article No. 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-017-0514-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Massaro, M., Martinelli, R., Gatta, V., Scoditti, E., Pellegrino, M., Carluccio, M.A., Calabriso, N., Buonoomo, T., Stuppia, L, Storelli, C. and De Caterina, R. (2015) Transcriptome-Based Identification of New Anti-Anti-Inflammatory and Vasodilating Properties of the n-3 Fatty Acid Docosahexaenoic Acid in Vascular Endothelial Cell under Proinflammatory Conditions. PLOS ONE, 10, e0129652. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129652</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barsony, J. and Marx, S.J. (1991) Rapid Accumulation of Cyclic GMP Near Activated Vitamin D Receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88, 1436-1440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.4.1436</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Negri, M., Gentile, A., De Angelis, C., Monto, T., Patalano, R., Colao, A., Pivonello, R. and Pivonello, C. (2020) Vitamin D-Induced Molecular Mechanisms to Potentiate Cancer Therapy and to Reverse Drug-Resistance in Cancer Cells. Nutrients, 12, Article 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fathi, F.Z.M., Sadek, K.M., Khafaga, A.F., Al Senosy, A.W., Ghoniem, H.A., Fayez, S. and Zeweil, M.F. (2022) Vitamin D Regulates Insulin and Ameliorates Apoptosis and Oxidative Stress in Pancreatic Tissues of Rats with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 90219-90229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22064-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhutia, S.K. (2022) Vitamin D in Autophagy Signaling for Health and Diseases: Insights on Potential Mechanisms and Future Perspectives. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 99, Article ID: 108841.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2021.108841</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pan, Z., Xie, Y., Bai, J., Lin, Q., Cui, X. and Zhang, N. (2018) Bufalin Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth through Promoting Autophagy in vivo and in vitro. RSC Advances, 8, 38910-38918. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA06566G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hohmann, N., Xia, N., Steinkamp-Fenske, K., Forstermann, U. and Huige, L. (2016) Estrogen Receptor Signaling and the P13K/Akt Pathway Are Involved in Betulinic Acid-Induced eNOS Activation. Molecules, 21, Article 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21080973</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nie, C., Zhou, J., Qin, X., Shi, X., Zeng, Q., Liu, J., Yan, S. and Zhang, L. (2016) Diosgenin-Induced Autophagy and Apoptosis in a Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line. Molecular Medicine Reports, 14, 4349-4359. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5750</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kosic, M., Paunovic, V., Ristic, B., Mircic, A., Bosnjak, M., Stevanovic, D., Kravic-Stevovic, T., Trajkovic, V. and Harhaji-Trajkovic, L. (2021) 3-Methyladenine Prevents Energy Stress-Induced Necrotic Death of Melanoma Cells through Autophagy-Independent Mechanisms. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, 147, 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphs.2021.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sheng , Y., Sun, B., Guo, W.T., Zhang, Y.H., Liu, X., Xing, Y. and Dong, D.L. (2013) 3-Methyladenine Induces Cell Death and Its Interaction with Chemotherapeutic Drugs Is Independent of Autophagy. Biochemical Biophysics Research Communications, 432, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.01.106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Georges, E., Lian, J. and Laberge, R. (2014) A Tamoxifen Derivative, N, N-Diethyl-2[4-(Phenylmethyl) Phenoxy] Ethanamine, Selectively Targets P-Glycoprotein-Positive Multidrug Resistant Chinese Hamster Cells. Biochemical Pharmacology, 90, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.04.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Voisin, M., de Medina, P., Malingre, A., Dalenc, F., Huc-Claustre, E., Leignadier, J., Serhan, N., Soules, R., Segala, G., et al. (2017) Identification of a Tumor-Promoter Cholesterol Metabolite in Human Breast Cancers Acting through the Glucocorticoid Receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, E9346-E9355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707965114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noureddine, L.M., Tredan, O., Hussein, N., Badran, B., Le Romancer, M. and Poulard, C. (2021) Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Multifaceted Actor in Breast Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22, Article 4446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silvente-Poirot, S., Segala, G., Poirot, M.C. and Poirot, M. (2018) Ligand-Dependent Transcriptional Induction of Lethal Autophagy: A New Perspective for Cancer Treatment. Autophagy, 14, 555-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1425059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Butz, H. and Patocs, A. (2022) Mechanisms behind Context-Dependent Role of Glucocorticoids in Breast Cancer Progression. Cancer Metastasis Reviews, 41, 803-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-022-10047-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, W.R. (2022) Contributors to Cancer Susceptibility, Development and Treatment: Cyclic Nucleotides, Steroids and Autophagy Modulators. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 10, 65-86. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2022.102008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anh, N.H., Long, N.P., Kim, S.J., Min, J.E., Yoon, S.J., Kim, H.M., Yang, E., Hwang, E.S., Park, J.H., Hong. S.S. and Kwon, S.W. (2019) Steroidomics for the Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Cancers: A Systematic Review and Functional Analysis. Metabolites, 9, Article 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100199</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Africander, D. and Storbeck, K.H. (2018) Steroid Metabolism in Breast Cancer: Where Are We and What Are We Missing? Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 466, 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.05.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houghton, L.C., Howland, R.E., Wei, Y., Ma, X., Kehm, R.D., Chung, W.K., Genkinger, J.M., Santella, R.M., Hartmann, M.F., Wudy, S.A. and Terry, M.B. (2021) The Steroid Metabolome and Breast Cancer Risk in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: The Novel Role of Adrenal Androgens and Glucocorticoids. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention, 30, 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0471</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kashgari, F.K., Ravna, A., Sager, G., Lysa, R., Enyedy, I. and Dietrichs, E.S. (2020) Identification and Experimental Confirmation of Novel cGMP Efflux Inhibitors by Virtual Ligand Screening of Vardenafil-Analogues. Biomedicine &amp; Pharmacotherapy, 126, Article ID: 110109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suganya, N., Mani, K.P., Sireesh, D., Rajaguru, P., Vairamani, M., Suresh, T., Suzuki, T., Chatterjee, S. and Ramkumar, K.M. (2018) Establishment of Pancreatic Microenvironment Model of ER Stress: Quercetin Attenuates β-Cell Apoptosis by Invoking Nitric Oxide-cGMP Signaling in Endothelial Cells. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 55, 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.12.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeong, S.O., Son, Y., Lee, J.H., Choi, S.W., Kim, H.K., Cheong, Y.K., Chung, H.T. and Pae, H.O. (2017) Both Nitric Oxide and Nitrite Prevent Homocysteine-Independent Endoplasmic Reticulum Distress and Subsequent Apoptosis Via cGMP-Dependent Pathway in Neuronal Cells. Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications, 493, 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, W., Wang, Y., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Ma, T., Chan, A.M.L., Chiu, P.K.F., Ng, C.F., Wu, D. and Chan, F.L. (2022) Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthetase (eNOS)-NO Signaling Axis Functions to Promote the Growth of Prostate Cancer Stem-Like Cells. Stem Cell Research, 13, Article No. 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02864-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sokanovic, S.J., Baburski, A.Z., Kojic, Z., Medar, M.L.J., Andric, S.A. and Kostic, T.S. (2021) Ageing-Related Increase of cGMP Disrupts Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Leydig Cells. The Journal of Gerontology Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 76, 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa132</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129126-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ben-Jonathan, N., Borcherding, D.C. and Hugo, E.R. (2022) Dopamine Receptors in Breast Cancer: Prevalence, Signaling, and Therapeutic Applications. Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, 27, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevOncog.2022043641</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>