<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2023.1311152</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS-129106</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Soil Seed Bank of the Marantaceae Forests of Ouesso Forest Industry (IFO), Republic of Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stevy</surname><given-names>Endurance Nkellankela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chauvelin</surname><given-names>Douh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Moussoumbou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Belvina</surname><given-names>Chardène Mabengo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Larisa</surname><given-names>Mbouchi Malonga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saint</surname><given-names>Fédriche Ndzaï</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>Koubouana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Forest Ecology, National Forestry Research Institute (IRF), Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Geomatics and Applied Tropical Ecology (LGETA), Superior National School of Agronomy and Forestry (ENSAF), Marien N’GOUABI University, Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1935</fpage><lpage>1950</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The soil seed bank is a key indicator of natural regeneration and/or forests resilience after disturbances. This study evaluates the soil seed bank characteristics in two Marantaceae forests plots of Ouesso Forest Industry (IFO) in north of the Republic of Congo. In each plot, 12 samples were taken per soil layers (0 - 5 cm, 5 - 10 cm, 10 - 15 cm and 15 - 20 cm deep). Diversity and abundance seed were estimated after germination of soil samples. The results reveal
  ed
   101 seedlings belonging to 17 species for plot 1 and 129 seedlings belonging to 15 species for plot 2. The average densities of germinated seeds were respectively 281 seedling/m<sup>2</sup> and 358 seedling/m<sup>2</sup>. There were no significant differences (p &gt; 0.05) between the mean densities of the two plots. Herbaceous species dominated with percentages of 71%
   
  and 73%, respectively in plot 1 and plot 2. Both plots showed potential of regeneration from the soil seed bank. However, this potential seems higher in plot 2. Pioneer taxa were more abundant in the soil seed bank of plot 1 (4 woody pioneer species) than in plot 2 (1 woody pioneer species). The highest species richness was obtained in the first two soil layers (0 - 5 cm and 5 - 10 cm depth) while 25% of species were exclusively found in the deepest layer (15 - 20 cm) in plot 2. The study suggests silvicultural interventions based on planting or enrichment techniques for contribute to sustainable management of Marantaceae forests that could prevent the growth and development of seedlings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Soil Seed Bank</kwd><kwd> Seedlings</kwd><kwd> Marantaceae Forests</kwd><kwd> Natural Regeneration</kwd><kwd> Forest Resilience</kwd><kwd> Republic of Congo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Soil seed bank represents viable seeds stored in litter, on soil, and in soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref2">2</xref>] . They are ungerminated seeds, capable of replacing adult plants having disappeared for various reasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref3">3</xref>] . Insofar as the soil seed bank intrinsically assumes the existence of an any form of dormancy of the seeds constituting it, it is mainly the so-called orthodox seeds (persistent seeds having a long viability in the soil) who compones the soil bank [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The soil seed bank is an important element of natural regeneration. It forms a reserve that can be expressed during a disturbance of arborescent covered [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref6">6</xref>] . The importance of the soil seed bank in natural regeneration of forests has been relatively studied less in tropical zone and most studies have concerned America and Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref7">7</xref>] . In the moist forests of Central Africa, we can nonetheless note some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref11">11</xref>] . These studies globally demonstrate the dominance of pioneer tree species in the soil seed bank and the low similarity with the surrounding vegetation.</p><p>Nonetheless, to improve the regeneration of woody species, planting in open forest habitats with seedlings from nurseries should be more effective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref13">13</xref>] . Studies of the soil seed bank in Marantaceae forests still remain an unexplored research axis in moist forests of Central Africa and even less in the Republic of Congo. Marantaceae forests are composed of giant and perennial herbaceous plants, with rhizomes that are often very covering and of imposing size [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] . They are distinguished by an original physiognomy characterized by the presence of a continuous stratum of giant herbaceous plants, associated with a disseminated wooded component presenting a deficit of natural regeneration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Occupying large areas, Marantaceae forests can compromise the sustainability of logging activity to long term [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] . Consequently, the dynamics of regeneration through the soil seed bank within these Marantaceae forests is an innovative axis of research. The specific richness, diversity and abundance of the soil seed bank of Marantaceae forests can be an important source of natural regeneration, particularly in exploited forests which represent 26% of the forest cover of Central Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref15">15</xref>] . Knowledge of the floristic composition of soil seed bank in Marantaceae forests is essential insofar as it will allow to assess their regeneration potential. It will also inform on their past and future vegetation cover.</p><p>General objective of the present study is to assess the natural regeneration potential of Marantaceae forests through the soil seed bank. Three questions are asked in this study:</p><p>1) Does the germination of the soil seed bank vary according to plots and soil layers within Marantaceae forests?</p><p>2) Does the floristic composition of the soil seed bank differ in terms of the plots and soil layers of Marantaceae forests?</p><p>3) Does it exist exclusive species in the soil layers of the two Marantaceae plots?</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materiel and Methodes</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The study was carried in the forest concession allocated to Ouesso Forest Industry (IFO) in the Ngombe Forest Management Unit (FMU, Ngombe) in north of the Republic of Congo. The site presents a relatively flat relief with average altitudes between 400 m and 430 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref16">16</xref>] . The FMU Ngombe extends between 0˚27' - 1˚48'N and 15˚20' - 16˚38'E (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The site is part of the semi-humid equatorial climate zone. It is characterized by two dry seasons and two rainy seasons per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] . Average annual rainfall and average temperatures are 1730 mm and 27˚C respectively.</p><p>The FMU Ngombe forests are semi-deciduous and installed on clay soils which develop on the alluvial deposits of the Congolese basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref16">16</xref>] . They are shelter many species typical of old secondary forests such as Entandrophragma cylindricum, Entandrophragma utile, Erythrophleum suaveolens, Triplochiton scleroxylon. A large part of FMU Ngombe is covered with Marantaceae forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] . These Marantaceae forests have a undergrowth invaded by giant herbaceous species of the Marantaceae and Zingiberaceae families, which can reach several meters height. The floor shrubby is poorly represented and displays a regeneration deficit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Germination Test of the Soil Seed Bank</title><p>The soil samples were taken in August 2020 (during the transition between the short dry season and the big rainy season) within two Marantaceae forests plots (plot 1, exploited in 2019, and plot 2, exploited in 2017). In each Marantaceae forests plot (1000 m * 500 m, area of one plot), three non-contiguous plots of 625 m<sup>2</sup> (25 * 25 m) were installed, at the rate of 6 plots for the two Marantaceae forests plots.</p><p>Inside each 625 m<sup>2</sup> plot, four sub-plots measuring 12.50 m were used for sampling points collection, i.e. a total of 12 collections points per plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Four layers of soil were sampled per point: 0 - 5 cm, 5 - 10 cm, 10 - 15 cm et 15 - 20 cm. Each sample was composite, i.e. from the mixture of three unit samples taken on the vertices of an equilateral triangle with sides of 1 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] . Each sample concerned an area of 100 cm<sup>2</sup> (10 * 10 cm). The sampled area by Maranaceae forests plots covered accordingly 0.36 m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p>The number of viable seeds in the soil samples has been estimated by the germination method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref17">17</xref>] . The samples were sieved before the start of the experiment, in order to eliminate plant elements and minerals elements (leaves, smithereens of wood). Germination was realized in a greenhouse at the National School of Agronomy and Forestry (ENSAF) to Brazzaville, in a non-forest area in order to limit the risk of contamination of the samples by the surrounding vegetation.</p><p>Relative light intensity was about 30% - 40% of full light. Each soil sample was spread out on a layer of sterilized substrate-sand mixture about 1 cm thick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref17">17</xref>] . Watering was daily, and germinations control was bi-weekly. When their stage of development allowed, the seedlings were withdrawned and repotted individually in polyethylene bags to promote their growth and identification.</p><p>As all the germinations took place over the course of the first 12 weeks, the experiment was stopped after 16 weeks (i.e. 4 months of experimentation).</p><p>Voucher specimens were collected and species were identified by botanists (Gilbert Nsongola, Isaac Dzombo). We followed the taxonomy of the Geneva Herbaria Catalogue (http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Soil Seed Bank Germination</title><p>To evaluate the evolution of germination in terms of time, the number of seeds having effectively germinated in the soil bank has been estimated for each Marantaceae forests plot and soil layers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Floristic Composition of the Soil Seed Bank between Plots and Soil Layers</title><p>To identify the characteristics of the species observed in the soil seed bank, classification of tree and shrub species was done according to light requirements using the regeneration guilds of tropical forest species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref19">19</xref>] , and the dispersal syndromes of seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref20">20</xref>] . Also, classification of species was done in terms of tree and shrub species, herbaceous species, liana species and undetermined species.</p><p>To describe the abundance of seeds from the two Marantaceae plots, the following parameters were used: the absolute density, AD (seed/m<sup>2</sup>), the relative density, RD (%, number of seeds of a given species/the total number of seeds for all species), the relative frequency RF (%, proportion of samples containing the given species) and the species Importance Value Index (IVI) computed as the sum of RD and RF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Nonetheless, the observed species richness S<sub>obs</sub>, being a biased estimator and very dependent of sampling effort [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref22">22</xref>] , the estimators Chao2, S<sub>chao</sub><sub>2</sub> (based on incidence) and Jackknife1, S<sub>jack</sub><sub>1</sub> (based on abundance) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref24">24</xref>] were used. These species richness estimators are defined as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref26">26</xref>] :</p><p>S C h a o 2 = S o b s + Q i 2 2 Q i (1)</p><p>S J a c k 1 = S o b s + Q 1 ( m − 1 ) m (2)</p><p>S<sub>obs</sub>: observed species richness;</p><p>Q<sub>1</sub>: number of species detected in a single sample (unique);</p><p>Q<sub>2</sub>: number of species detected in two samples (duplicate);</p><p>m: total number of individuals sampled.</p><p>EstimateS software 9.1.0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref27">27</xref>] , was used to generate as well the observed species richness S<sub>obs</sub> than the estimated richness, S<sub>chao2</sub> (bias-corrected Chao2) and S<sub>jack1</sub>. These two types of richness have been illustrated by tables. Biological diversity was estimated using Shannon indices (H'), Equitability of Pielou (E) and Sorensen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref28">28</xref>] . Finally, the specificity of the soil layers in terms of species exclusively found in each soil layer was determined by reporting these “exclusive and/or endemic” species to total number of species collected in the soil layer (S<sub>excl</sub>%).</p><p>To compare the floristic composition of the two Marantaceae forests plots, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the abundance data of species, using R software with Vegan package [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref29">29</xref>] . Samples that gave no germination were excluded from the analysis.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Soil Seed Bank Germination of the Two Marantaceae Forests Plots</title><p>The evolution of germination all layers mixed, of the soil seed bank within the two Marantaceae forests plots indicates that in plot 1 (exploited in 2019), the first germination was observed from the ninth week to reach peak at the twelfth and thirteenth week (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Nonetheless, during the last two weeks (twelfth and thirteenth), nearly 29 and 15 new seedlings were recorded respectively. The last germinations occurred from the eighteenth week (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>However, in plot 2 (exploited in 2017), the first germinations occurred from the fifth week to reach peak at the twelfth and thirteenth week (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). We recorded respectively nearly 20 and 30 new seedlings. Germinations regressed globally from the fourteenth up to the sixteenth week with 7 new seedlings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Nonetheless, the evolution of germinations in terms of soil layers within the two plots demonstrate that in plot 1 (exploited in 2019), the first germination occurred from the eighth week with the 0 - 5 cm layer to reach peak at the twelfth and fifteenth week (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). This layer is illustrated as the most representative in number of germinated seeds. Moreover, in the 15 - 20 cm layer, 7 germinated seeds were recorded during the eleventh and seventeenth week. The last germinations occurred from the nineteenth week with the two aforesaid layers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>On the other hand, in plot 2 (exploited in 2017), the first germinations occurred from of the fourth week with the 0 - 5 cm and 10 - 15 cm layers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), and the germination peak occurred from the thirteenth week with the 0 - 5 cm layer. Also, the first germinations of the 15 - 20 cm layer were illustrated from the tenth week to fade around the seventeenth week with a overall number of 10 germinated seeds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Soil Seed Bank Composition of the Two Marantaceae Forests Plots</title><p>101 seedlings germinated from soil seed bank of plot 1 and 129 seedlings from plot 2, with respective average densities of 281 and 358 seedling/m<sup>2</sup>. There was no significant difference in the mean number of seedlings between the two plots (Kruskal-Wallis test, p-value = 0.5938). In plot 1, the seedlings belonged to 17 species with 4 species of trees and shrubs (23%), 12 herbaceous species (71%) and one species of liana (6%). The tree and shrub species group only included one commercial species: Nauclea diderrichii (De Wild. &amp; T. Durand) Merr. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>On the other hand, in plot 2, the seedlings belonged to 15 species with one species of tree and shrub (7%), 11 herbaceous species (73%) and 3 undetermined species (20%). No commercial tree species was observed. The most abundant trees and shrubs in the soil bank of plot 1 were N. diderrichii (43%) and Harungana madagascariensis Lam. ex Poire. (29%), while plot 2 presented only the species Margaritaria discoidea (Baill.) G. L. Webster (14%).</p><p>Nonetheless, the results of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) display a total variability of the two marantaceae forests plots of 25.56%. Consequently, the two Marantaceae forests plots globally share the same species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This observation to confirm Sorensen’s relatively low similarity value of 0.56% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Soil seed bank composition of the two Marantaceae forests plots, plot 1 and plot 2. Dispersal mode: Au = autochory, Z = zoochory. AD = absolute density, RD = relative density, RF = relative frequency, IVI = species importance value index. Temperament: p = pioneer</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Guild</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dispersal mode</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of seeds</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AD (n/m<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RD (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RF (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IVI</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plot 1 (exploited in 2019)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trees and shrubs (4 species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Margaritaria discoidea (Baill.) G. L. Webster</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phyllanthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au/Z</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Harungana madagascariensis Lam. ex Poir.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypericaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nauclea diderrichii (De Wild. &amp; T. Durand) Merr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rubiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trema orientalis (L.) Blume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cannabaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Herbaceous (12 species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. Ex DC.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amaranthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aneilema beniniense (P. Beauv.) Kunth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commelinaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aneilema umbrosum (Vahl) Kunth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commelinaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Costus lucanusianus J. Braun &amp; K. Schum.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Costaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commelina sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commelinaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyathula prostrata (L.) Blume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amaranthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elytraria marginata Vahl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acanthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lindernia diffusa (L.) Wettst.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scrophulariaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Microtea debilis Sw.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phytolaccaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panicum brevifolium L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sabicea sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rubiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tristemma hirtum P. Beauv.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Melastomataceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liana (1 species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plot 2 (exploited in 2017)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trees and shrubs (1 species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Margaritaria discoidea (Baill.) G. L. Webster</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phyllanthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au/Z</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Herbaceous (11 species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br. Ex DC.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amaranthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aneilema umbrosum (Vahl) Kunth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commelinaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. Walker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asteraceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyathula prostrata (L.) Blume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amaranthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dinophora spenneroides Benth.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Melastomataceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lindernia diffusa (L.) Wettst.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scrophulariaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Microtea debilis Sw.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phytolaccaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panicum brevifolium L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sabicea sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rubiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spermacoce latifolia Aubl.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rubiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tristemma hirtum P. Beauv.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Melastomataceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined (3 species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Variability of diversity indices within the two Marantaceae forests plots</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Plots</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Shannon index</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pielou’s equitability index</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sorensen index</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Common species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plot 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plot 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Soil Seed Bank Abundance within the Soil Layers of the Two Marantaceae Forests Plots</title><p>All soil layers presented a significant number of seeds and taxa (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Regardless of the plot, the 0 - 5 cm and 5 - 10 cm layers present the highest values of the estimated species richness. Interesting fact, the deepest layer 15 - 20 cm of plot 2 also presented a non-negligible seeds abundance and species richness of 25% exclusive species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Species found exclusively in the deepest soil layer were: Margaritaria discoidea (Baill.) G. L. Webster and Sabicea sp.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Soil seed bank characteristics in the soil layers of the two Marantaceae forests plots. Sobs = observed species richness; Schao2 = estimated specific richness according to the approach Chao2; Sjack1 = estimated specific richness according to the approach Jackniffe1; Sexcl (%) = percentage of exclusive species in each soil layer; Density = Mean (&#177;SD) of number seeds per area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Soil layers</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Plot 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Plot 2</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sobs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sexcl (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schao2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sjack1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Density (n/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sobs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sexcl (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schao2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sjack1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Density (n/m&#178;)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 5 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.11 (&#177;38.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.22 (&#177;26.55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 10 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67 (&#177;18.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (&#177;29.71)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 15 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67 (&#177;18.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.56 (&#177;8.45)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 20 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33 (&#177;10.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.22 (&#177;26.55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >358</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Soil Seed Bank Germination Varies in Terms of Marantaceae Forests Plots and Soil Layers</title><p>In the present study, we demonstrated that pioneer species of forest succession such as Margaritaria discoidea, Harungana madagascariensis, Nauclea diderrichii and Trema orientalis were present in the soil layers studied and much more abundant in plot 1 than in plot 2 which only presented the species M. discoidea. This could mean that this last one would be more mature than the first, which could be considered as a plot in process of recolonization.</p><p>All soil layers mixed, this study has demonstrated that in plot 1 (exploited in 2019), seeds germinated from the ninth week (i.e. about 2 months after germination of soil samples) to reach the germination peak from the twelfth week (i.e. about 4 months after germination of soil samples). No germination was recorded from the nineteenth week. On the other hand, in plot 2 (exploited in 2017), the seeds started to germinate from the fifth week (i.e. about 1 month after germination of soil samples) to reach the germination peak from the thirteenth week (i.e. about 3 months after germination of soil samples). From the seventeenth week, no germination was recorded. This slight difference germination times could be explained by the fact that in plot 2, exploited well before plot 1, the seeds stored in the soil bank would have lifted their dormancy, thus allowing enough rapid germination compared to plot 1.</p><p>The results of the present study differ in the logging company in southeast Cameroon (Pallisco), whose germination peak occurred from the fifth and seventh week. The last germinations occurred during the twelfth week [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] . Remember that this study was limited to the first five layers of soil. Likewise, germination peaks occurred from the third and fourth week to fade from the eighth week [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>Regarding germination from the soil layers of the two plots, the 0 - 5 cm and 5 - 10 cm layers were the first to germinate compared to others soil layers. This observation could be explained by the following facts: 1) the studies inherent to the soil seed bank tend to demonstrate that the floristic richness of the soil seed bank decreases rapidly with depth, whatever the biotope considered, and this, up to 50 cm deep [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref11">11</xref>] ; 2) the large majority of the soil seed bank is concentrated in the top 25 centimeters of soil, with greatest abundance in the top 5 or 10 centimeters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref31">31</xref>] . Consequently, the seeds located in the soil layers superficial (0 - 5 cm and 5 - 10 cm) are exposed to light, the latter being a limiting factor for the germination of most species of tropical forests.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. The Density and Floristic Composition of the Soil Seed Bank Differs in Terms of Plots and Soil Layers</title><p>In several studies, the spatial heterogeneity of the tropical forest soil seed bank has been emphasized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>Nonetheless, in Cameroon during the study of soil seed bank characteristics at minimum depth (5 cm depth), 88 seedling/m<sup>2</sup> have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] . In mature forest and old secondary forest, we report densities ranging from 247 seedling/m<sup>2</sup> to 330 seedling/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>In the present study, the seed densities obtained were higher and ranged from 281 seedling/m<sup>2</sup> to 358 seedling/m<sup>2</sup> because soil layers up to 20 cm deep were considered. The estimates reported in the literature can reach much higher values. Seed abundance in tropical soil layers ranges from 25 to 3350 seeds/m<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>This variation could also be due to the diversity of soil seed bank characterization methods, particularly sample size, season of soil sample collect, sample processing and depth of soils sampled [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref33">33</xref>] . The longevity of seeds in the soil bank could depend of their size and morphology. Long-lived persistent seeds are generally small size with a spherical shape [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><p>In the present study, herbaceous species dominated with varying between percentages 71% and 73%, respectively in plots 1 and 2. Previous studies have also demonstrated relatively similar percentages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref35">35</xref>] .</p><p>This can be explained by the following mechanisms: 1) herbaceous species produce a large amount of small seeds that naturally escape predation from the seed-feeding animals compared to large seeds; 2) these small seeds progressively accumulate in large quantities in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref36">36</xref>] and 3) they can survive for decades in the forester soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] . The tree species observed represented 7% and 23%, respectively in plots 2 and 1. In a similar forest in Cameroon, tree species such as: Erythrophleum suaveolens, Musanga cecropioides, Macaranga spp., Margaritaria discoidea, Tetrochidium didymostemon, Zanthoxylum spp. have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] . In the present study, the tree species found in the soil bank were: Harungana madagascariensis, Margaritaria discoidea, Nauclea diderrichii et Trema orientalis.</p><p>Only one tree species Margaritaria discoidea was found in the deepest soil layer of 15 - 20 cm. Margaritaria discoidea is frequent in wooded savannah, dry evergreen forest and dry secondary forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref37">37</xref>] . It is also found in semi-deciduous forest. Several parts of the plant are used in traditional medicine through out the African continent.</p><p>In West Africa, we chew filamentous and fibrous bark as purgative and aphrodisiac [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref38">38</xref>] . In north of Congo, it was reported that this species part of the indicator species of disturbed forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Overall, it was observed that the abundance and the floristic diversity seeds were higher in plot 2 (exploited in 2017) than in plot 1 (exploited in 2019). Such a trend has been observed elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref39">39</xref>] , which could translate a fairly rapid recolonization of plot 2 compared to plot 1.</p><p>Regarding species richness, the number of observed species (Sobs) found in this study ranged between 15 and 17 species. These values were relatively lower to those observed in other African forest sites (11 to 43 specie) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref10">10</xref>] . However, the strong heterogeneity of the soil seed bank requires the use of species richness estimators instead of the number of species observed (Sobs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>The most surprising discovery in the present study seems to be siginficant decrease of seeds abundance and species richness along soil depth. In the 15 - 20 cm layer, significant amount of viable seeds (about 25%) can still be observed. However, this layer is rarely explored during studies inherent at the soil seed bank. Clearly, deeper soil layers should not be ignored during studies of the soil seed bank in tropical forests.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The present study consisted to assess the potential of natural regeneration through the soil seed bank in the Marantaceae forests. The results highlighted the role that the soil seed bank could play in the natural regeneration of Marantaceae forests. At the end of this study, we can overall retain that: 1) soil seed bank characteristics vary from one plot to another; 2) seed stocks were substantial up to 20 cm soil depth, and some pioneer tree species had viable seeds in the deeper soil layers although they were absent in superficial layers; and 3) commercial tree species were not well represented in the soil seed bank of the two Marantaceae forests plots. Consequently, the study suggests silvicultural practices to improve the regeneration of commercial tree species in Marantaceae forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129106-ref41">41</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank Marien N’gouabi University, National Forest Research Institute (IRF), Department of Forest Ecology, as well as the company Ouesso Forest Industry (IFO DANZER) for their technical, scientific and financial supports. Gilbert Nsongola botanist is also thanked for identification species from the soil seed bank.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nkellankela, S.E., Douh, C., Moussoumbou, C., Mabengo, B.C., Malonga, L.M., Ndza&#239;, S.F. and Koubouana, F. (2023) Soil Seed Bank of the Marantaceae Forests of Ouesso Forest Industry (IFO), Republic of Congo. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 13, 1935-1950. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2023.1311152</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129106-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walck, J. L., Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Hidayati, S.N. (2005) Defining Transient and Persistent Seed Banks in Species with Pronounced Seasonal Dormancy and Germination Patterns. Seed Science Research, 15, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1079/SSR2005209</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savadogo, P., Sanou, L., Djibril Dayamba, S., Bognounou, F. and Thiombiano, A. (2016) Relationships between Soil Seed Banks and above-Ground Vegetation along a Disturbance Gradient in the W National Park Trans-Boundary Biosphere Reserve, West Africa. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10, 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douh, C., Makouanzi Ekomono, C.G., Kessimo, R.G. and Koubouana, F. (2022) Nursery Germination Trial of Tali Seeds, Erythrophleum Suaveolens (Guill. &amp; Perr.) Brenan. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 16, 2611-2620. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v16i6.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Baskin, J.M and Baskin, C.C. (2003) Classification, Biogeography and Phylogenetic Relationships of Seed Dormancy.In: Smith, R.D., Dickie, J.B., Simon, H., Pritchard, H.W. and Probert, R.J., Eds., Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice, The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, 518-544.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanou, L., Savadogo, P., Zida, D. and Thiombiano, A. (2019) Contrasting Land Use Systems Influence Soil Seed Bank Composition and Density in a Rural Landscape Mosaic in West Africa. Flora, 250, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.11.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjalla, C., Tosso, F., Salako, K.V. and Assogbadjo, A.E. (2022) Soil Seed Bank Characteristics along a Gradient of Past Human Disturbances in a Tropical Semi-Deciduous Forest: Insights for Forest Management. Forest Ecology and Management, 503, Article ID: 119744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119744</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sousa, T.R., Costa, F.R.C., Bentos, T.V., Leal Filho, N., Mesquita, R.C.G. and Ribeiro, I.O. (2017) The Effect of Forest Fragmentation on the Soil Seed Bank of Central Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management, 393, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Da&amp;#239;nou, K., Bauduin, A., Bourland, N., Gillet, J.F., Fétéké, F. and Doucet, J.-L. (2011) Soil Seed Bank Characteristics in Cameroonian Rainforests and Implications for Post-Logging Forest Recovery. Ecological Engineering, 37, 1499-1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.05.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douh, C., Da&amp;#239;nou, K., Loumeto, J.J., Fayolle, A. and Doucet, J.-L. (2014) Explorer la banque de graines du sol pour mieux comprendre la dynamique de régénération des forêts tropicales africaines (synthèse bibliographique). Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 18, 558-565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douh, C., Da&amp;#239;nou, K., Loumeto, J., Moutsambote, J.M., Fayolle, A., Tosso, F., Forni, E., Gourlet-Fleury, S. and Doucet, J.-L. (2018) Soil Seed Bank Characteristics in Two Central African Forest Types and Implications for Forest Restoration. Forest Ecology and Management, 409, 766-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zebaze, D., Fayolle, A., Da&amp;#239;nou, K., Libalah, M., Droissart, V., Sonké, B. and Doucet, J.-L. (2021) Land Use has Little Influence on the Soil Seed Bank in a Central African Moist Forest. Biotropica, 54, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doucet, J.-L., Kouadio, J.Y., Monticelli, D. and Lejeune, P. (2009) Enrichment of Logging Gaps with Moabi (Baillonella toxisperma Pierre) in a Central African Rain Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 2407-2415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.08.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doucet, J.-L., Da&amp;#239;nou, K., Ligot, G., Ouedraogo, D.Y., Bourland, N., Ward, S.E., Tekam, P., Lagoute, P. and Fayolle, A. (2016) Enrichment of Central African Logged Forests with High-Value Tree Species: Testing a New Approach to Regenerating Degraded Forests. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services &amp; Management, 12, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1168868</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gillet, J.F. (2013) Les forêts à Marantaceae au sein de la mosa&amp;#239;que forestière du nord de la République du Congo: origines et modalités de gestion. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Liège—Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Wasseige, C., Devers, D., de Marcken, R., Eba'a-Atyi, R., Nasi, R. and Mayaux P. (2009) Les forêts du bassin du Congo. Etat des forêts 2008. Office des Publications de l’Union Européenne, Luxembourg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IFO (2007) Unité Forestière d’Aménagement (UFA) Ngombé—Plan d'Aménagement. 456 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douh, C., Makouanzi Ekomono, C.G., Bouya, A.H. and Koubouana, F. (2022) Determinants of the Seeds Germination of Mukulungu-Autranella Congolensis (De Wild.) A.Chev. in Nursery. Revue Africaine d’Environnement et d’Agriculture, 5, 63-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elazazi, E.M. (2016) Effective Methods to Improvement Capparis Spinosa L. (Caper) Seeds Germination by Breaking Seed Dormancy in Qatar Gene Bank. Qatar Foundation Annual Research Conference Proceedings, 2016, EEPP2483. https://doi.org/10.5339/qfarc.2016.EEPP2483</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawthorne, W.D. (1995) Ecological Profiles of Ghanaian Forest Trees. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Armesto, J.J. and Rozzi, R. (1989) Seed Dispersal Syndromes in the Rain Forest of Chiloé: Evidence for the Importance of Biotic Dispersal in a Temperate Rain forest. Journal of Biogeography, 16, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845258</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martins, A.M. and Engel, V.L. (2007) Soil Seed Banks in Tropical Forest Fragments with Different Disturbance Histories in Southeastern Brazil. Ecological Engineering, 31, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.05.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walther, P., Resch, K.J., Rudolph, T., Schenck, E., Weinfurter, H., Vedral, V., Aspelmeyer, M. and Zeilinger, A. (2005) Experimental One-Way Quantum Computing. Nature, 434, 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walther, B.A. and Martin, J.L. (2001) Species Richness Estimation of Bird Communities: How to Control for Sampling Effort? Ibis, 143, 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2001.tb04942.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chiarucci, A., Enright, N.J., Perry, G.L.W., Miller, B.P. and Lamont, B.B. (2003) Performance of Nonparametric Species Richness Estimators in a High Diversity Plant Community. Diversity Distributions, 9, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00027.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Chao, A. (2005) Species richness estimation. In: Balakrishnan, N., Read, C.B. and Vidakovic, B. Eds., Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Wiley, New York, 7907-7916.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chao, A., Li, P.C., Agatha, S. and Foissner, W. (2006) A Statistical Approach to Estimate Soil Ciliate Diversity and Distribution Based on Data from Five Continents. Oikos, 114, 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14814.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colwell, R.K. (2013) EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 9.1.0. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marcon, E. (2015) Practical Estimation of Diversity from Abundance Data. In: HAL 01212435. Version 2, 32-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Legendre, P. and Gallagher, E. (2001) Ecologically Meaningful Transformations for Ordination of Species Data. Oecologia, 129, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100716</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamebe-Ndong. (2016) Etude de la banque de graines du sol de trois parcelles exploitées: Cas de l’Industrie Forestière d’Ouesso (IFO). Madter’s Thesis, Université Marien Ngouabi, 67 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Garwood, N.C. (1989) Tropical Soil Seed Banks: A Review. In: Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T. and Simpson, R.L. Eds., Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, Academic Press, San Diego, 149-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-440405-2.50014-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Perera</surname><given-names> G.A.D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Spatial Heterogeneity of the Soil Seed Bank in the Tropical Semideciduous Forest at Wasgomuwa National Park, Sri Lanka</article-title><source> Tropical Ecology</source><volume> 46</volume>,<fpage> 79</fpage>-<lpage>89</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warr, S., Thompson, K. and Kent, M. (1993) Seed Banks as a Neglected Area of Biogeographic Research: A Review of Literature and Sampling Techniques. Progress in Physical Geography, 17, 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339301700303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schweinbacher, E., Marcante, S. and Erschbamer, B. (2010) Alpine Species Seed Longevity in the Soil in Relation to Seed Size and Shape—A 5-Year Burial Experiment in the Central Alps. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 205, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2008.10.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grombone-Guaratini, M.T., Leit&amp;#227;o-Filho, H.F. and Kageyama, P.Y. (2004) The Seed Bank of a Gallery Forest in Southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47, 793-797. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132004000500015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnolds, J.L., Musil, C.F., Rebelo, A.G. and Krüger, G.H.J. (2015) Experimental Climate Warming Enforces Seed Dormancy in South African Proteaceae but Seedling Drought Resilience Exceeds Summer Drought Periods. Oecologia, 177, 1103-1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3173-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arbonnier, M. (2004) Trees, Shrubs and Lianas of West African Dry Zones. CIRAD, Margraf Publishers Gmbh, MNHN, Paris, 573 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezegbe Chekwube, A., Ogechukwu Udodeme, H., Onyia, O.C. and Agu Kalu, A. (2021) Evaluation of Antidiarrhoeal Activity of Methanol Extracts of the Leaf of Margaritaria discoidea. American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry, 5, 33-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flores, S. and Dezzeo, N. (2005) Variaciones temporales en cantidad de semillas en el suelo y en lluvia de semillas en un gradiente bosque-sabana en la gran sabana. Venezuela Interciencia, 30, 39-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walther, B.A. and Moore, J.L. (2005) The Concepts of Bias, Precision and Accuracy, and Their Use in Testing the Performance of Species Richness Estimators, with a Literature Review of Estimator Performance. Ecography, 28, 815-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04112.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129106-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douh, C., Mbouchi Malonga, L., N’zala, D., Mabengo, B.C., Moussoumbou, C., Ndza&amp;#239;, S.F. and Koubouana, F. (2023) Regeneration Potential of Woody Species at the Side of Secondary Roads Post-Logging of Loundoungou-Toukoulaka Forest Management Unit, Republic of the Congo. Natural Resources, 14, 102-120. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2023.147008</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>