<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Resources</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-706X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/nr.2023.1410014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NR-129015</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modelling of the Hydrogeological Behaviour of the Tassette Aquifer: Study of the Possibilities of Exploiting This Aquifer as an Alternative against the Limestone Problem in the Commune of Thies
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saidou</surname><given-names>Ndao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Famara</surname><given-names>Seydi Ba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Papa</surname><given-names>Babacar Diop Thioune</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diadioly</surname><given-names>Gassama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Science and Technology of Water and Environment (LaSTEE), Polytechnic School of Thies, Thies, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Agricultural and Rural Training ISFAR, Alioune DIOP University of Bambey, Bambey, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>UFR Sciences and Technologies, Iba Der THIAM University of Thies, Thies, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>205</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Senegal’s drinking water supply comes on the one hand from groundwater and mainly from Maastrichtian and Paleocene aquifers. The Tassette area included in the Thies region has such potential that the Paleocene is currently exploited to cover a certain part of Dakar’s important water needs. In addition,
   the city of Thies is itself confronted with the problems of limes
  tone present in its drinking water and generally creating problems of scaling pipes. A water transfer is therefore a possible option to deal with this situation. This study will consist of modelling the Tassette aquifer to determine if it will cover Thies’ water needs over a period of 20 years. To assess the responses of the groundwater to pumping at this level and the changes that may occur, a numerical hydrogeological model is necessary. In order to have a better overview of the area, boreholes and piezometric tests were carried out, highlighting the different characteristics of the aquifer and the water it contains. Based on
   these, the model was developed according to a mesh system and 
  more precisely by discretization and simulation according to the finite difference method from the Visual Modflow Flex software. The results observed for this modelling show that the city of Thies cannot be supplied as a whole. 
  This mining model also causes brackish water intrusion. On the other hand, the additional withdrawal of a certain quantity of water compared to the current situation does not have as great negative impacts and would still partially meet the expectations of this modelling.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Modelling</kwd><kwd> Tassette</kwd><kwd> Hydrogeological Model</kwd><kwd> Aquifer</kwd><kwd> Aquifer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Senegal is a country facing several problems in terms of its groundwater resources according to the different zones and regions. Indeed, Senegal’s groundwater suffers from ills such as overexploitation, salinization, excess fluoride, limestone or iron, or anthropogenic pollution. Good management of these resources would therefore be necessary to ensure the improvement of the living conditions of populations and sustainable development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref2">2</xref>] . Thies, a city near Senegal’s capital Dakar, whose drinking water is supplied mainly from the Maestrichtian aquifer, is particularly affected by the significant presence of limestone. When the water is thus rich in limestone, it is called hard water. The advantage of hard water is that it covers part of the Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> needs of man and it is more pleasant to drink, however, limescale deposits in pipes imply the reduction of diameters which can be the cause of system malfunction, a decrease in working pressure, energy and additional expenses due to the alteration of water transfer pipes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In order to deal with this problem of hard water, transferring water from Tassette would be a good alternative. At this level, a battery of boreholes has been set up by the National Water Company of Senegal (SONES) and hydrogeological and geophysical studies as well as qualitative and quantitative monitoring are conducted by the Directorate of Water Resources Management and Planning (DGPRE). A more in-depth study aimed at feeding the city of Thies could be envisaged.</p><p>Tassette is part of the department of Thies. The distance separating it from the city is equal to about 20 km [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref6">6</xref>] . The water of the Tassette aquifer being of better quality than that present in Thies, this transfer could be done either completely, that is to say with cessation of the use of the Thies aquifer, or by a possible dilution of the water of the Thies aquifer by that coming from Tassette to lower the concentration of minerals such as limestone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods and Materials</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Geographical Location of the Study Area</title><p>The region of Thies, located in the west of Senegal at 14˚46' North - 16˚54' West, is limited to the east by Fatick and Diourbel, to the west by Dakar and the Atlantic Ocean, to the north by Louga and to the south by the Fatick region. It thus covers nearly 3.4% of the country’s surface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref9">9</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the location of the Tassette area.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Visual Modflow Flex Software Overview</title><p>Visual Modflow Flex is a software created by SCHLUMBERGER Water Services;</p><p>It has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that simulates groundwater flows, their quality, quantity, etc., thanks to a set of tools [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>With this software, it is possible to choose between a conceptual model approach and a classical numerical model approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref15">15</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Estimated Water Needs of the City of Thies in 2037</title><p>For the estimation of the population Thiessoises by 2037 we start from the geometric method given by the following relation:</p><p>P<sub>n</sub> = P<sub>o</sub> &#215; (1 + T)<sup>n</sup> (1)</p><p>With</p><p>P<sub>n</sub> = Future population</p><p>P<sub>o</sub> = Current population</p><p>n = horizon</p><p>T = rate of increase</p><p>We will consider an increase rate of 2.5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.129015-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Daily consumption is equivalent to:</p><p>C<sub>j</sub> = P<sub>n</sub> &#215; C<sub>u</sub> (2)</p><p>C<sub>u</sub> = Unit consumption</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Elaborating Model Input Parameters</title><p>1) Geologic of aquifere</p><p>At the study area level, three (3) electrical sounding sections were developed. Two (2) oriented from southwest to northeast (SW-NE) and one (1) approximately west to east (W-E). From these profiles, isobath maps of the roof and wall of the aquifer and isopaque maps of thicknesses were prepared.</p><p>2) Sampling</p><p>v The Paleocene globally is exploited by about 300 boreholes. In the area more specifically, we mainly note:</p><p>v The drilling of the Notto-Diosmone-Palmarin system which takes a total flow of 5500 m<sup>3</sup>/d;</p><p>v Four (4) functional rural boreholes operating between 46 and 178 m<sup>3</sup>/d, an average flow of 112 m<sup>3</sup>/d;</p><p>v Seven (7) SONES boreholes used mainly for the supply of Dakar and taking overall a flow of nearly 15,000 m<sup>3</sup>/d.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Model Calibration</title><p>For steady state, we determine the hydraulic conductivity at saturation of the zone. The calibration will thus be carried out from data such as operating rates, hydraulic conductivity, boundary conditions.</p><p>There are three conductivity zones to arrive at an acceptable calibration of the model: a conductivity zone equal to 7 &#215; 10<sup>−1</sup> m/s located in the northwest part, a second in the central part, around 4 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> m/s and in the southeast, the conductivity would be 3 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> m/s.</p><p>For each simulation scenario, we have entered in a table the flow rates used.</p><p>• Scenario 1</p><p>For this situation, it is considered the current AEP with the drilling already present in the area for a horizon of 20 years.</p><p>Seven (7) boreholes set up by SONES provide nearly 150 m<sup>3</sup>/h each, or 3000 m<sup>3</sup>/d; four (4) rural boreholes with flows between 46 and 178 m<sup>3</sup>/d, or an average of about 112 m<sup>3</sup>/d; NDP system drilling that exploits 5500 m<sup>3</sup>/d.</p><p>Drilling information for this scenario is reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>• Scenario 2</p><p>In addition to the data from scenario 1, we consider in it an increase in the number of collection structures for the supply of the city of Thies by 2037.</p><p>Assuming that this increase in exploitation is carried out from a battery of five (5) boreholes dug in the central part of the model in order to avoid overexploitation in the southeastern and western parts and at the same time limit brackish water inflows.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location and operating rates of scenario 1 structures</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Y_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Z (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pumping</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rate (m<sup>3</sup>/j)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette F4 NDP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sipane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,615,207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,614,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298,990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,523</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,928</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The water needs of the city of Thies for 20 years having been estimated above at 37,000 m<sup>3</sup>/d, providing this quantity of water would imply an operating rate of 370 m<sup>3</sup>/h by boreholes, considering a pumping time of 20 hours, i.e. a daily volume of 7400 m<sup>3</sup> produced by each borehole (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>• Scenario 3</p><p>We start here from a contribution of part of the water needs of the city of Thies, still for the horizon of 20 years, for a possible dilution with the water currently used to reduce limestone concentrations. The captor field added to the previous scenario is retained. However, Thies’ water requirements for scenario 3 being halved 18,500 m<sup>3</sup>/d, operating flows would therefore return to 185 m<sup>3</sup>/d for each structure. The pumping time considered to be 20 hours, the volume pumped at each borehole is therefore 3700 m<sup>3</sup>/d (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>• Scenario 4</p><p>This scenario consists of covering nearly a third of the water needs of the inhabitants of the city of Thies. The Tassette aquifer does not have a very large capacity, and considering in this case that scenarios 2 and 3 do not provide good results and are therefore not able to meet the expectations of this modelling, this option would therefore, if the results are conclusive, be a plus both for the population concerned and for the quantitative and qualitative conservation of that groundwater.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Location and operating flows of scenario 2 structures</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Y_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Z (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pumping</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rate (m<sup>3</sup>/d)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette F4 NDP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sipane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,615,207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,614,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298,990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,523</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,928</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,618,245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297,186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,618,229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297,168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.507</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,882</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,907</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7400</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Location and operating rates of scenario 3 structures</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Y_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Z</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pumping</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rate (m<sup>3</sup>/d)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette F4 NDP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sipane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,615,207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,614,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298,990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,523</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,928</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,618,245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297,186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,618,229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297,168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.507</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,882</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,907</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3700</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Indeed, in this scheme, we seek to provide nearly a third of the estimated needs for this population and for 20 years. We are therefore starting from a flow of 12,000 m<sup>3</sup> withdrawn per day, in addition to the current situation, that is to say scenario 1. This quantity divided between boreholes F8, F9, F10, F11 and F12 is equivalent to a flow rate of 2400 m<sup>3</sup>/d per drilling, or 120 m<sup>3</sup>/h per borehole for a daily pumping of 20 hours. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the flow rates sampled for this scenario.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p>This part is particularly devoted to the different results obtained for this modeling, we will first estimate the drinking water needs of the inhabitants of the city of Thies and this result will make it possible to evaluate the behavior of the aquifer in cases where these quantities are taken.</p><p>The principle of the model and calibration will help to better understand the processes by which the results obtained are generated in Visual Modflow Flex.</p><p>To meet the demand of the city of Thies in a horizon of twenty (20) years, the necessary water production should be about 37,000 m<sup>3</sup> per day for a population of 552,709 inhabitants.</p><p>At this level, the simulation results indicate an evolution of the piezometric surface almost identical to steady-state piezometrics.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Location and operating rates of the works in the scenario</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Y_COORD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Z (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pumping</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rate (m<sup>3</sup>/d)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette F4 NDP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sipane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,615,207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,614,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tassette P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298,990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,616,856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,523</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,619,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291,928</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,620,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,618,245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297,186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,618,229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297,168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.507</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,882</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,907</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296,560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,617,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2400</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The loads in the different structures retain substantially the same values in the first periods. But a rather small discount would be observed at the end of the 20 years of project. This variation is mainly due to the pumping of large flows around the battery of the 7 boreholes of the SONES. The balance of inputs and outputs during the simulation is estimated according to 10 Time Step steps of 20 stress periods each. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the balance of model inputs and outputs for scenario 1 to 2037.</p><p>The simulation results for this situation show a very significant variation in piezometrics even altering the saturation of the water table in places with loads of about −24 m. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the balance of water inflows and outflows in the area.</p><p>For this scenario, we find that the decrease in the potential withdrawal to supply the city of Thies gives less extreme results compared to the second situation. Indeed, the simulation with the same process and the same calibration data as the previous one reveals a piezometric surface remaining above the level of the roof of the aquifer. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows Balance of model inputs and outputs for scenario 3 to 2037.</p><p>Regarding this option, the charges are negative in places and mainly towards the center where the catchment field for Thies is located. They remain positive towards the East up to nearly 4 meters. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows Balance of model inputs and outputs for scenario 4 to 2037.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Groundwater quality is the most cost-effective way to supply households that are not served by public or private distribution systems, such as rural villages, and could serve as a catalyst for economic growth by increasing irrigated land and improving crop yields and crop diversity.</p><p>In short, the collection and exploitation of the various data related to the Paleocene aquifer, and more particularly in the Tassette area and its surroundings, made it possible to propose a general presentation of the area and its characteristics. As the Tassette area is indicated by several studies as part of the favourable potential for water transfers, it is therefore necessary to establish a model for the efficient and effective exploitation of this resource. In this sense, different scenarios were proposed and simulated during this work in order to deduce their effect on the water table, its capacity and its piezometric load. The results of this step were rather conclusive in terms of the almost unchanged piezometric surface.</p><p>It will especially be necessary to carry out regular maintenance of the supply networks and avoid high temperatures at the level of the appliances such as hot water ducts, water heaters, washing machines, etc., leading to the precipitation of limescale and the formation of scale. In addition, including the Maastrichtian in this same Tassette area would perhaps make it possible to have a modeling with better results because it has greater potential.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ndao, S., Ba, F.S., Thioune, P.B.D. and Gassama, D. (2023) Modelling of the Hydrogeological Behaviour of the Tassette Aquifer: Study of the Possibilities of Exploiting This Aquifer as an Alternative against the Limestone Problem in the Commune of Thies. Natural Resources, 14, 205-214. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2023.1410014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.129015-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faye, C. Water Resources Management in Africa: Data Availability Issues and Uncertainties Associated with Hydrological Measurements in Senegal.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faye, M.M. (2005) Senegal Agricultural Market Development Program.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diakhaté, F. (2022) Mining Resources and Local Development: The Case of the Commune of Chérif L&amp;#244; (Thies Region).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diop, M. (2021) Problem of Access to Drinking Water in Urban Areas: The Case of the Commune of the Cleaned Plots of Dakar.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laissard, G. (1984) Water for Your Health: Practical Manual for Hydrotherapy and Balneotherapy. FeniXX.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SY, B.A., Kola, E., Magrin, G., et al. Tropicale (IGT) of the University. Felix Houphou&amp;#235;t-Boigny, Cote d’Ivoire-Dr. Ibrahima MBAYE (Geographer), Associate Professor, Assane SECK University, Ziguinchor (Senegal)-Dr. Tidiane SANE (Geographer), Associate Professor, Assane SECK University, Ziguinchor (Senegal)-Dr Irène KASSI-DJODJO, (Geographer), Associate Professor, Institute of Tropical Geography (IGT).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diédhiou, A., LO, M.L., Thioune, P.B.D., et al. (2018) Modelling of Water Erosion of Cultivated and Uncultivated Soils on the Thies Plateau (Senegal). International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 25, 210-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mainguet, M. (1999) Aridity: Droughts and Human Development. Springer Science &amp; Business Media, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03906-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ly, C., Fall, B., Camara, B., et al. (1998) Urban Horse-Drawn Transport in Senegal-Situation and Economic Importance in the City of Thies. Journal of Livestock and Veterinary Medicine of Tropical Countries, 51, 165-172. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9643</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martos-Rosillo, S., Guardiola-Albert, C. and Marín-Lechado, C. (2015) Hydrogeological Characterization and Evaluation of the Recharge of a High Mountain Aquifer Developed in Hard Rocks, Bérchules River Basin, Sierra Nevada, Granada. Water in Andalusia. Water: Key Environmental and Socio-Economic Issues. IGME, Madrid, 623-634.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López Ramírez, S.E., et al. (2015) Update of the Numerical Model of the Morroa Aquifer Using Visual Modflow Flex.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cisneros Zamora, G.Z. (2019) Groundwater Flow Model of the Laguna de Hormigas Aquifer, Chihuahua, Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Chihuahua.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mouakoumbat, N.J.L., Gampio, U.M., Nkaya, G.M., et al. (2022) Hydrogeological Characterization and Approach to a Conceptual Model of the Aquifer of the Cuvette Basin, Republic of Congo. International Journal of Geosciences, 13, 997-1023. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2022.1311051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gossel, W. (2013) GIS-MODFLOW: A Small OpenSource Tool to Connect GIS Data with MODFLOW. Grundwasser, 18, 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00767-012-0218-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalil, K., Khan, Q. and Mohamed, M. (2022) Modeling Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Eastern District of the United Arab Emirates Using MODFLOW. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 17537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20470-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.129015-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diop, T. (1990) Population and Cities Senegal: Demographic Growth. Africa Development/Afrique et Développement, 33-43.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>