<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2023.1411044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-128954</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On the Construction and Classification of the Common Invariant Solutions for Some &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;(1,4) -Invariant Partial Differential Equations
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vasyl</surname><given-names>M. Fedorchuk</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Volodymyr</surname><given-names>I. Fedorchuk</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Pidstryhach Institute for Applied Problems of Mechanics and Mathematics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>728</fpage><lpage>747</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  We consider the following (1 + 3)-dimensional 
  P(1,4)-invariant partial differential equations (PDEs): the Eikonal equation, the Euler-Lagrange-Born-Infeld equation, the homogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation, the inhomogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation. The purpose of this paper is to construct and classify the common invariant solutions for those equations. For this aim, we have used the results concerning construction and classification of invariant solutions for the (1 + 3)-dimensional 
  P(1,4)-invariant Eikonal equation, since this equation is the simplest among the equations under investigation. The direct checked allowed us to conclude that the majority of invariant solutions of the (1 + 3)-dimensional Eikonal equation, obtained on the base of low-dimensional (
  dimL ≤ 3) nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebra of the Poincar&#233; group 
  P(1,4), satisfy all the equations under investigation. In this paper, we present obtained common invariant solutions of the equations under study as well as the classification of those invariant solutions.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Symmetry Reduction</kwd><kwd> Classification of Invariant Solutions</kwd><kwd> Common  Invariant Solutions</kwd><kwd> The Eikonal Equations</kwd><kwd> The Euler-Lagrange-Born-Infeld Equations</kwd><kwd> The Monge-Amp&#232;re Equations</kwd><kwd> Classification of Lie Algebras</kwd><kwd> Nonconjugate Subalgebras</kwd><kwd> Poincar&#233; Group &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;(1</kwd><kwd>4)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A solution of many problems of the geometric optics, theories of anisotropic media, theory of minimal surfaces, nonlinear electrodynamics, theories of gravity, geometry, unified field theory, string theories, black holes, cosmology, etc. is reduced to the investigation of the Eikonal equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref5">5</xref>] , the Euler-Lagrange equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref12">12</xref>] , the Born-Infeld equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref22">22</xref>] , the Monge-Amp&#232;re equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref40">40</xref>] in the spaces of different dimensions and different types (see also the references therein).</p><p>Nowadays, there exist a lot of methods for the construction exact solutions of linear and nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). More details on this theme can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref41">41</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref46">46</xref>] (see also the references therein).</p><p>We consider the following (1 + 3)-dimensional P ( 1,4 ) -invariant PDEs:</p><p>• the Eikonal equation,</p><p>• the Euler-Lagrange-Born-Infeld equation,</p><p>• the homogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation,</p><p>• the inhomogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation.</p><p>From the results obtained by Fushchich W.I., Shtelen W.M. and Serov N.I. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref40">40</xref>] , it follows, in particular, that the common symmetry group of those equations is the generalized Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,4 ) . Therefore, in the natural way arises the following question: what is the relationship between invariant solutions of the equations under study? In particular, whether those equations have common invariant solutions?</p><p>The purpose of this paper is to try to construct and classify the common invariant solutions for the equations under consideration. It is known that the (1 + 3)-dimensional P ( 1,4 ) -invariant Eikonal equation is the simplest one among the equations under study. Therefore, we can use this fact for constructing the common invariant solutions. At the present time, we have constructed invariant solutions for the (1 + 3)-dimensional P ( 1,4 ) -invariant Eikonal equation obtained on the base of low-dimensional ( d i m L ≤ 3 ) nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebra of the Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,4 ) , by using classical Lie-Ovsiannikov approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref44">44</xref>] . This method, in particular, allows us to perform the symmetry reduction of the many-dimensional PDEs with non-trivial symmetry groups to differential equations with a fewer number of independent variables as well as to construct solutions, invariant with respect to nonconjugate subgroups of the symmetry groups, of the equations under study. According to this method, reduced equations (invariant solutions) should be classified with respect to the ranks of the corresponding nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebras of the symmetry groups of the equations under study.</p><p>Our contribution in classical Lie-Ovsiannikov method consists in the suggestion to use, for the classification of symmetry reductions (invariant solutions) of PDEs with non-trivial symmetry groups, not only ranks of nonconjugate subalgebras, but also their structural property. Some details on this theme can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>In our paper, we have performed the suggestion for the classification of the common invariant solutions of some P(1, 4)-invariant PDEs by using the structural property of the low-dimensional ( d i m L ≤ 3 ) nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebra of the Poincar&#233; group P(1, 4).</p><p>The direct checks allowed us to conclude that the majority of invariant solutions of the (1 + 3)-dimensional Eikonal equation, obtained on the base of low-dimensional ( d i m L ≤ 3 ) nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebra of the Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,4 ) , satisfy all the equations under investigation. In this paper, we present obtained common invariant solutions of the equations under study as well as the classification of those invariant solutions.</p><p>To present the results obtained, we give some information about the Lie algebra of the Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,4 ) and its nonconjugate subalgebras.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Lie Algebra of the Poincar&#233; Group P ( 1 , 4 ) and Its Nonconjugate Subalgebras</title><p>The group P ( 1,4 ) is a group of rotations and translations of the five-dimensional Minkowski space M ( 1,4 ) . It is the smallest group, which contains, as subgroups, the extended Galilei group G ˜ ( 1,3 ) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref49">49</xref>] (the symmetry group of classical physics) and the Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,3 ) (the symmetry group of relativistic physics).</p><p>The Lie algebra of the group P ( 1,4 ) is generated by 15 bases elements M μ ν = − M ν μ ( μ , ν = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) and P μ ( μ = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) , which satisfy the commutation relations</p><p>[ P μ , P ν ] = 0 ,   [ M μ ν , P σ ] = g ν σ P μ − g μ σ P ν , (1)</p><p>[ M μ ν , M ρ σ ] = g μ σ M ν ρ + g ν ρ M μ σ − g μ ρ M ν σ − g ν σ M μ ρ , (2)</p><p>where g 00 = − g 11 = − g 22 = − g 33 = − g 44 = 1 , g μ ν = 0 , if μ ≠ ν .</p><p>In this paper, we consider the following representation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref40">40</xref>] of the Lie algebra of the group P ( 1,4 ) :</p><p>P 0 = ∂ ∂ x 0 ,   P 1 = − ∂ ∂ x 1 ,   P 2 = − ∂ ∂ x 2 ,   P 3 = − ∂ ∂ x 3 , (3)</p><p>P 4 = − ∂ ∂ u ,   M μ ν = x μ P ν − x ν P μ ,     x 4 ≡ u . (4)</p><p>In the following, we will use the next bases elements:</p><p>G = M 04 ,   L 1 = M 23 ,   L 2 = − M 13 ,   L 3 = M 12 , (5)</p><p>P a = M a 4 − M 0 a ,   C a = M a 4 + M 0 a ,   ( a = 1 , 2 , 3 ) , (6)</p><p>X 0 = 1 2 ( P 0 − P 4 ) ,   X k = P k   ( k = 1 , 2 , 3 ) ,   X 4 = 1 2 ( P 0 + P 4 ) . (7)</p><p>The Lie algebra of the extended Galilei group G ˜ ( 1,3 ) is generated by the following bases elements:</p><p>L 1 ,   L 2 ,   L 3 ,   P 1 ,   P 2 ,   P 3 ,   X 0 ,   X 1 ,   X 2 ,   X 3 ,   X 4 . (8)</p><p>The classification of all nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebra of the group P ( 1,4 ) of dimensions ≤ 3 was performed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref50">50</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. On the Construction and Classification of the Common Invariant Solutions for Some (1 + 3)-Dimensional P ( 1 , 4 ) -Invariant PDEs</title><p>In this Section, We Consider the Following PDEs</p><p>• the Eikonal equation</p><p>u 0 2 − u 1 2 − u 2 2 − u 3 2 = 1 ;</p><p>• the Euler-Lagrange-Born-Infeld equation</p><p>□   u ( 1 − u ν u ν ) + u μ u ν u μ ν = 0 ;</p><p>• the homogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation</p><p>det ( u μ ν ) = 0 ;</p><p>• the inhomogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation</p><p>det ( u μ ν ) = λ ( 1 − u ν u ν ) 3 ,   λ ≠ 0,</p><p>where u = u ( x ) , x = ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) ∈ M ( 1 , 3 ) , u μ ≡ ∂ u ∂ x μ , u μ ν ≡ ∂ 2 u ∂ x μ ∂ x ν , u μ = g μ ν u ν , g μ ν = ( 1, − 1, − 1, − 1 ) δ μ ν , μ , ν = 0,1,2,3 , □ is the d’Alembert operator.</p><p>Here, and in what follows, M ( 1,3 ) is a four-dimensional Minkowski space, R ( u ) is a real number axis of the depended variable u.</p><p>From the results obtained by Fushchich W.I., Shtelen W.M. and Serov N.I. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref40">40</xref>] it follows, in particule, that the common symmetry group of those equations is the generalised Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,4 ) .</p><p>In this section we present obtained common invariant solutions of the equations under study as well as the classification of those invariant solutions. To obtain those results, we used the nonconjugate subalgebras of the Lie algebra of the group P ( 1,4 ) , structural properties of its low-dimensional ( d i m L ≤ 3 ) nonconjugate subalgebras as well as the results of the classification of symmetry reductions of the eikonal equation. More details on this theme can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>Bellow we present the results obtained.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Classification of the Common Invariant Solutions for the Equations under Study Using One-Dimensional Nonconjugate Subalgebras of the Lie Algebra of the Group P ( 1 , 4 )</title><p>1) 〈 G 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = − ( 1 − c 2 2 − c 3 2 ) 1 / 2 x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>2) 〈 G + α X 1 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>α ln ( 2 α ( ( c 1 2 + c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 + α ) x 0 − u ) − ( c 1 2 + c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 − x 1 + c 1 x 2 + c 2 x 3 + c 3 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>3) 〈 L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = ( c 2 2 + c 3 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 x 0 + c 2 x 3 + c 3 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>4) 〈 L 3 + α ( X 0 + X 4 ) ,   α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = i α c 2 arctanh c 2 α ( ( c 1 2 − c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + c 2 2 α 2 ) 1 / 2           − i ( ( c 1 2 − c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + c 2 2 α 2 ) 1 / 2 + c 2 ( x 0 − α arctan x 1 x 2 ) + c 1 x 3 + c 3 .</p><p>5) 〈 L 3 + α X 3 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = ( c 1 2 − c 2 2 − 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − α 2 c 2 2 + c 2 α arctan x 1 x 2             − c 2 α arctan ( ( c 1 2 − c 2 2 − 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − α 2 c 2 2 c 2 α ) + c 2 x 3 + c 1 x 0 + c 3 .</p><p>6) 〈 L 3 + 2 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 − u + 2 arctan x 2 x 1 = i ( c 2 2 + 4 c 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + 4 − 2 i arctanh ( 2 ( c 2 2 + 4 c 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + 4 )       + c 1 ( x 0 + u ) + c 2 x 3 + c 3 .</p><p>7) 〈 P 3 − 2 X 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>1 6 ( x 0 + u ) 3 + x 3 ( x 0 + u ) + x 0 − u = − 1 6 ( ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 x 3 − c 1 2 − c 2 2 ) 3 / 2 + c 1 x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 3 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>8) 〈 X 0 + X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = i ( c 2 2 + c 3 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 and c 3 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>9) 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 = − i ( c 2 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 1 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,</p><p>where: c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary real constants, f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Classification of the Common Invariant Solutions for the Equations under Study Using Two-Dimensional Nonconjugate Subalgebras of the Lie Algebra of the Group P ( 1 , 4 )</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Lie Algebras of the Type 2A<sub>1</sub></title><p>1) 〈 G 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ( 1 − c 2 2 ) 1 / 2 x 3 + c 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>2) 〈 G + α X 3 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = − ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 + α ln ( 2 α ( ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 + α ) x 0 2 − u 2 )       + c 1 x 1 2 + x 2 2 + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>3) 〈 G 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 + α X 3 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 + α arctan x 1 x 2 = α arctan α ( c 2 2 − 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − α 2 + c 2 ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2       + ( c 2 2 − 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − α 2 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>4) 〈 G 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε ( 1 − c 2 2 ) 1 / 2 x 2 + c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>5) 〈 G + α X 2 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 + ( c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 c 2 2 = α c 2 arctanh α c 2 ( c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 c 2 2 + α c 2 2 ln x 0 − u x 0 + u + c 2 x 2 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>6) 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 + C 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( u 2 + x 3 2 ) 1 / 2 = ( c 2 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 x 0 + c 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>7) 〈 L 3 + α ( X 0 + X 4 ) ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 + C 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 − α arctan x 1 x 2 = α arctan α ( 1 − c 2 2 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − α 2 + c 2 u 2 + x 3 2       + ( 1 − c 2 2 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − α 2 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>8) 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 0 + X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = i ε ( c 2 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>9) 〈 L 3 + α ( X 0 + X 4 ) ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = α arctan x 1 x 2 + i c 1 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + α 2             − i α arctanh α c 1 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + α 2 − x 0 + c 1 x 3 + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>10) 〈 L 3 + α X 3 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 0 + X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = α c 1 arctan ( x 1 ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + α 2 − i α x 2 x 2 ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + α 2 + i α x 1 )           + i c 1 ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + α 2 + x 3 c 1 + c 2 ,   c 1 ≠ 0.</p><p>11) 〈 L 3 + 2 X 4 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 − u + 2 arctan x 2 x 1</p><p>= 2 i arctanh 1 c 1 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + 1 − 2 i c 1 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + 1 + c 1 ( x 0 + u ) + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>12) 〈 L 3 − P 3 + 2 α X 0 ,   α ≠ 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 + u − 2 α arctan x 1 x 2 = 2 i α ε 4 c 2 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + 1 − 2 i α ε arctanh 1 4 c 2 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + 1       + c 2 ( ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 α x 3 ) + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>13) 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 − 2 X 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>1 6 ( x 0 + u ) 3 + x 3 ( x 0 + u ) + x 0 − u = c 1 x 1 2 + x 2 2 − 1 6 ( ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 x 3 − c 1 2 ) 3 / 2 + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>14) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 = 0.</p><p>15) 〈 P 1 − X 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 = 0.</p><p>16) 〈 P 1 − X 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − γ X 2 − β X 3 ,   β &gt; 0 , γ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 ( x 1 − 2 c 2 ) x 0 + u + ( x 2 − β c 2 ) 2 + c 2 2 x 0 + u + γ + γ c 2 2 ( x 0 + u ) ( x 0 + u + γ ) − ( c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 + u ) + 2 c 2 x 3 + 2 u + c 1 = 0,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>17) 〈 P 1 − X 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − γ X 2 ,   γ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 1 − c 2 ) 2 x 0 + u + x 2 2 x 0 + u + γ + 2 u = ( c 2 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 + u ) − 2 c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>18) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − X 2 − β X 3 ,   β &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 2 x 0 + u + 2 u = ( c 2 2 4 + 1 ) ( x 0 + u ) − ( β c 2 + 2 x 2 ) 2 4 ( x 0 + u + 1 ) + c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>19) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − X 2 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 2 x 0 + u + x 2 2 x 0 + u + 1 + 2 u = ( c 2 2 4 + 1 ) ( x 0 + u ) + c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>20) 〈 P 3 − 2 X 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = &#177; c 2 x 2 − 4 x 3 − i c 2 2 + 16   x 1 + c 1 − x 0 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>21) 〈 P 3 − 2 X 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>1 6 ( x 0 + u ) 3 + x 3 ( x 0 + u ) + x 0 − u = ε c 1 x 2 − ε 6 ( ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 x 3 − c 1 2 ) 3 / 2 + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>22) 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 = i ε x 3 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p><p>23) 〈 L 3 + α X 3 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 + α arctan x 1 x 2 = i ε x 1 2 + x 2 2 + α 2 − i ε α arctanh α x 1 2 + x 2 2 + α 2 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p><p>24) 〈 P 3 − X 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 − x 3 x 0 + u = i ε x 2 1 ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 1 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p><p>25) 〈 P 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 = i ε x 2 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p><p>26) 〈 X 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 = i ε x 2 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>2</sub></title><p>1) 〈 − G ,   P 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε 1 − c 2 2   x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>2) 〈 − G − 1 λ L 3 ,   X 4 ,   λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>ln ( x 0 + u ) = i λ arctanh λ c 1 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + λ 2 − i c 1 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + λ 2     − λ arctan x 1 x 2 + c 1 x 3 + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>3) 〈 − G − α X 1 ,   X 4 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = i ε ( c 2 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 x 2 + c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>4) 〈 − 1 λ ( L 3 + λ G + α X 3 ) ,   X 4 ,   α &gt; 0 , λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>ln ( x 0 + u ) = i ε c 2 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + ( α c 2 − λ ) 2                                   − i ε ( α c 2 − λ ) arctanh α c 2 − λ c 2 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + ( α c 2 − λ ) 2                                   + ( α c 2 − λ ) arctan x 1 x 2 + c 2 x 3 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p><p>5) 〈 − G − α X 1 ,   P 3 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = α ln ( 2 α ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 + α x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 )     − ( c 1 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 + c 1 x 2 + c 2 ,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Classification of the Common Invariant Solutions for the Equations under Study Using Three-Dimensional Nonconjugate Subalgebras of the Lie Algebra of the Group P ( 1 , 4 )</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Lie Algebras of the Type 3A<sub>1</sub></title><p>1) 〈 P 1 − γ X 3 , γ &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − X 2 − δ X 3 , δ ≠ 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 + u ) 4 + 2 ( x 0 + u ) 3 + ( γ 2 + δ 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 2 γ 2 ( x 0 + u ) + γ 2 = 0.</p><p>2) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − X 2 − δ X 3 , δ &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 + u ) 2 + 2 ( x 0 + u ) + δ 2 + 1 = 0.</p><p>3) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 = c ( x 0 + u ) ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>4) 〈 P 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 2 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 = c ( x 0 + u ) ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>5) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 = c ( x 0 + u ) ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>6) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − X 2 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − u 2 x 0 + u − x 2 2 x 0 + u + 1 = c ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>7) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − α X 2 , α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 − γ X 3 , γ ≠ 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>2 u + x 1 2 x 0 + u + x 2 2 x 0 + u + α + x 3 2 x 0 + u + γ = x 0 + u + c ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>8) 〈 P 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 2 − α X 2 , α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>2 u + x 1 2 + x 3 2 x 0 + u + x 2 2 x 0 + u + α = x 0 + u + c ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>9) 〈 G 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 2 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε x 3 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>10) 〈 G 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>11) 〈 P 3 − 2 X 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 2 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>1 6 ( x 0 + u ) 3 + x 3 ( x 0 + u ) + x 0 − u = ε 6 ( ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 x 3 ) 3 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>12) 〈 G + α X 3 , α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 2 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = ε ( α 2 + x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 − α 2 ln ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) − ε α arctanh ( α 2 + x 0 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 α + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>13) 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 P 3 + C 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 0 + X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 3 2 + u 2 ) 1 / 2 = i ε ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>14) 〈 L 3 + α ( X 0 + X 4 ) , α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 + u + α arctan x 2 x 1 = i ε α 2 ln ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>15) 〈 P 3 − 2 X 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 x 3 = 4 i ε x 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>16) 〈 L 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 − P 3 + 2 X 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 2 X 4 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 x 3 = 4 i ε ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Lie Algebras of the Type A 2 ⊕ A 1</title><p>1) 〈 − G ,   P 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε x 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>2) 〈 − G ,   P 3 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>3) 〈 − ( G + α X 2 ) ,   P 3 , α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 2 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = ε ( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 + α 2 ) 1 / 2 − α 2 ln ( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 )       − ε α arctanh α ( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 + α 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>4) 〈 − 1 λ L 3 − G ,   2 X 4 , λ &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 X 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>ln ( x 0 + u ) + λ arctan x 1 x 2 = i ε λ 2 ln ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>5) 〈 − ( G + α X 3 ) ,   X 4 ,   α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 + β X 3 ,   β &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) + β arctan x 1 x 2 = − i ε β arctanh β ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + β 2 ) 1 / 2 + i ε ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + β 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>6) 〈 − ( G + α X 3 ) ,   X 4 , α &gt; 0 〉 ⊕ 〈 L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = i ε ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) 1 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>3,1</sub></title><p>1) 〈 4 X 4 ,   P 1 − X 2 − γ X 3 ,   P 2 + X 1 − μ X 2 − δ X 3 , γ &gt; 0 , δ ≠ 0 , μ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 + u ) 4 + 2 μ ( x 0 + u ) 3 + ( γ 2 + μ 2 + δ 2 + 2 ) ( x 0 + u ) 2   + 2 μ ( γ 2 + 1 ) ( x 0 + u ) + ( γ μ − δ ) 2 + γ 2 + 1 = 0.</p><p>2) 〈 2 μ X 4 ,   P 3 − 2 X 0 ,   X 1 + μ X 3 ,   μ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = 2 ( i ε x 2 μ 2 + 1 + μ x 1 − x 3 + c ) 1 / 2 − x 0 ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>3) 〈 2 X 4 ,   P 3 − L 3 − 2 α X 0 ,   X 3 , α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = 2 α arctan x 1 x 2 + i ε α ln ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) − x 0 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>4) 〈 − 2 β X 4 ,   L 3 + β X 3 ,   P 3 − 2 X 0 , β &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>β arctan x 1 x 2 + 1 4 ( x 0 + u ) 2 = i ε x 1 2 + x 2 2 + β 2 − i ε β arctanh β x 1 2 + x 2 2 + β 2 − x 3 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>5) 〈 2 X 4 ,   P 3 ,   X 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 2 = i ε x 1 + f ( x 0 + u ) ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where f is an arbitrary smooth function.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>3,2</sub></title><p>1) 〈 2 α X 4 ,   λ P 3 ,   1 λ L 3 + G + α λ X 3 , α &gt; 0 , λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>ln ( x 0 + u ) + λ arctan x 1 x 2 = i ε λ 2 ln ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>3,3</sub></title><p>1) 〈 P 1 ,   P 2 ,   G 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε x 3 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>2) 〈 P 1 ,   P 2 ,   G + α X 3 , α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = ε ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 + α 2 ) 1 / 2 − i ε α arctan ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 + α 2 ) 1 / 2 i α       − α 2 ln ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1.</p><p>3) 〈 P 3 ,   X 4 ,   1 λ L 3 + G , λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>ln ( x 0 + u ) + λ arctan x 1 x 2 = i ε λ 2 ln ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_6"><title>3.3.6. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>3,6</sub></title><p>1) 〈 P 1 − X 1 ,   P 2 − X 2 ,   − P 3 + L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 1 2 + x 2 2 x 0 + u + 1 + x 3 2 x 0 + u + 2 u = x 0 + u + c ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>2) 〈 P 1 ,   − P 2 ,   − ( L 3 + α X 3 ) , α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 = c ( x 0 + u ) ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>3) 〈 P 1 ,   P 2 ,   − P 3 + L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 = c ( x 0 + u ) ,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>4) 〈 X 1 ,   − X 2 ,   P 3 − L 3 − 2 α X 0 , α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 + u ) 3 + 6 α x 3 ( x 0 + u ) + 6 α 2 ( x 0 − u ) = ε ( ( x 0 + u ) 2 + 4 α x 3 ) 3 / 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>5) 〈 X 1 , − X 2 , − L 3 − 1 2 ( P 3 + C 3 ) − α ( X 0 + X 4 ) , α &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>α arctan x 3 u − x 0 = ε x 3 2 + u 2 − α 2 + ε α arctan α x 3 2 + u 2 − α 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>6) 〈 X 1 ,   X 2 ,   L 3 + λ 2 ( P 3 + C 3 ) + α ( X 0 + X 4 ) ,   α &gt; 0 ,   0 &lt; λ &lt; 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>α arctan x 3 u − λ x 0 = ε λ 2 ( x 3 2 + u 2 ) − α 2 + ε α arctan α λ 2 ( x 3 2 + u 2 ) − α 2 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>7) 〈 X 1 ,   X 2 ,   L 3 + λ G + α X 3 , α &gt; 0 , λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>λ x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = ε λ 2 ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 − ε α arctanh α λ 2 ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + α 2       − α 2 ln ( x 0 2 − u 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1.</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>8) 〈 P 1 ,   P 2 ,   L 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>x 3 = c 1 ln ( x 0 + u ) − ε ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 + c 1 2 ) 1 / 2               + ε c 1 arctanh x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 + c 1 2 c 1               − c 1 2 ln ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) + c 2 ,   ε = &#177; 1,   c 1 ≠ 0.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_7"><title>3.3.7. Lie Algebras of the Type A 3 , 7 a</title><p>1) 〈 P 1 ,   P 2 ,   L 3 + λ G , λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε x 3 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>2) 〈 P 1 ,   P 2 ,   L 3 + λ G + α X 3 , α &gt; 0 ,   λ &gt; 0 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>λ x 3 − α ln ( x 0 + u ) = ε ( λ 2 ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 ) 1 / 2 − ε α arctanh λ 2 ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) + α 2 α       − α 2 ln ( x 0 2 − x 1 2 − x 2 2 − u 2 ) + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_8"><title>3.3.8. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>3,8</sub></title><p>〈 P 3 ,   G ,   − C 3 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 0 2 − x 3 2 − u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε ( 1 − c 2 2 ) 1 / 2 x 1 + c 2 x 2 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_9"><title>3.3.9. Lie Algebras of the Type A<sub>3,9</sub></title><p>1) 〈 − 1 2 ( L 3 + 1 2 ( P 3 + C 3 ) ) ,   1 2 ( L 2 + 1 2 ( P 2 + C 2 ) ) , 1 2 ( L 1 + 1 2 ( P 1 + C 1 ) ) 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 + u 2 ) 1 / 2 = ε x 0 + c ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>2) 〈 − L 3 ,   − L 2 ,   − L 1 〉 :</p><p>The common invariant solution for the equations under study:</p><p>u = ε ( c 2 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 x 0 + c 2 ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 ) 1 / 2 + c 1 ,   ε = &#177; 1,</p><p>where c 1 , c 2 are arbitrary constants.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In this paper, we have presented obtained common invariant solutions of the following (1 + 3)-dimensional equations: the Eikonal equations, the Euler-Lagrange-Born-Infeld equation, the homogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation and the inhomogeneous Monge-Amp&#232;re equation. We have used the structural properties of the low-dimensional ( d i m L ≤ 3 ) nonconjugate subalgebras of the same ranks of the Lie algebra of the Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,4 ) for classification of the obtained common invariant solutions.</p><p>Since the group P ( 1,4 ) contains, as subgroups, the extended Galilei group G ˜ ( 1,3 ) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128954-ref49">49</xref>] (the symmetry group of classical physics) and the Poincar&#233; group P ( 1,3 ) (the symmetry group of relativistic physics), the results obtained can be useful in construction and investigation of corresponding physical models.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Fedorchuk, V.M. and Fedorchuk, V.I. (2023) On the Construction and Classification of the Common Invariant Solutions for Some-Invariant Partial Differential Equations. Applied Mathematics, 14, 728-747. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2023.1411044</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.128954-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rumer, Y.B. (1956) Studies in 5-Dimensional Optics. State Publishing Office for Technico-Theoretical Literature, Moscow.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lizzi, F., Marmo, G., Sparano, G. and Vinogradov, A.M. (1994) Eikonal Type Equations for Geometrical Singularities of Solutions in Field Theory. Journal of Geometry and Physics, 14, 211-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0393-0440(94)90008-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marciano-Melchor, M., Newman, E.T. and Silva-Ortigoza, G. (2005) 4D Conformal Metrics, the Eikonal Equation and Fourth-Order ODEs. Classical Quantum Gravity, 22, 5073-5088. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/22/23/010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borovskikh, A.V. (2014) Eikonal Equation for Anisotropic Media. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 197, 248-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-014-1714-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mieling, T.B. (2021) The Response of Laser Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors Beyond the Eikonal Equation. Classical Quantum Gravity, 38, Article ID: 175007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac15db</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lie, S. (1879) Beitrage zur Theorie der Minimalfl&amp;#228;chen. I. Proektivische Untersuchungen über algebraische Minimalfl&amp;#228;chen. Mathematische Annalen, 14, 331-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lie, S. (1879) Beitrage zur Theorie der Minimalfl&amp;#228;chen. II. Metrische untersuchungen über algebraische Minimalfl&amp;#228;chen. Mathematische Annalen, 15, 465-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02086273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shavokhina, N.S. (1990) Minimal Surfaces and Nonlinear Electrodynamics. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd., Teaneck, 504-511.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B&amp;#238;l&amp;#259;</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Lie Groups Applications to Minimal Surfaces PDE</article-title><source> Differential Geometry—Dynamical Systems</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>9</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grundland, A.M. and Hariton, A. (2017) Algebraic Aspects of the Supersymmetric Minimal Surface Equation, Symmetry, 9, Article 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9120318</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caffarelli, L.A. and Sire, Y. (2020) Minimal Surfaces and Free Boundaries: Recent Developments. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 57, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, H.Y. and Yan, W.P. (2020) Explicit Self-Similar Solutions for a Class of Zero Mean Curvature Equation and Minimal Surface Equation. Nonlinear Analysis, 197, Article ID: 111814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2020.111814</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Born, M. (1934) On the Quantum Theory of Electromagnetic Field. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 143, 410-437. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.0010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1934) Foundations of the New Field Theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 144, 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.0059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Makarenko, A.N., Odintsov, S.D. and Olmo, G.J. (2014) Little Rip, ΛCDM and Singular Dark Energy Cosmology from Born-Infeld-f(R) Gravity. Physics Letters B, 734, 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harko, T., Lobo, F.S.N., Mak, M.K. and Sushkov, S.V. (2015) Wormhole Geometries in Eddington-Inspired Born-Infeld Gravity. Modern Physics Letters A, 30, Article ID: 1550190. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732315501904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elizalde, E. and Makarenko, A.N. (2016) Singular Inflation from Born-Infeld-f(R) gravity. Modern Physics Letters A, 31, Article ID: 1650149. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732316501492</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruglov, S.I. (2019) Dyonic Black Holes in Framework of Born-Infeld-Type Electrodynamics. General Relativity and Gravitation, 51, Article No. 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-019-2603-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayawiguna, B.N. and Ramadhan, H.S. (2019) Charged Black Holes in Higher-Dimensional Eddington-Inspired Born-Infeld Gravity. Nuclear Physics B, 943, Article ID: 114615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bahrami-Asl, B. and Hendi, S.H. (2020) Complexity of the Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Black Holes. Nuclear Physics B, 950, Article ID: 114829.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114829</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chernikov, N.A. and Shavokhina, N.S. (1986) The Born-Infeld Theory as Part of Einstein.s Unified Field Theory. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Matematika, 4, 62-64</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chernitskii, A.A. (2020) Fundamental Interactions and Quantum Behavior in Unified Field Theory. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35, Article ID: 2040021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X20400217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lie</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1877</year>)<article-title>Neue Integrationsmethods der Monge-Ampérschen Gleichung</article-title><source> Archiv der Mathematik</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>9</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lie</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1898</year>)<article-title>Zur Geometrie einer Monge'schen Gleichung. Berichte S&amp;#228;chs. Ges</article-title><source></source><volume> 50</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>2</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minkowski, H. (1903) Volumen und Oberfl&amp;#228;che. Mathematische Annalen, 57, 447-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01445180</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>&amp;#538;i&amp;#539;eica</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1907</year>)<article-title>Sur une nouvelle classe de surfaces, Comptes Rendus Mathématique. Académie des Sciences</article-title><source> Paris</source><volume> 144</volume>,<fpage> 1257</fpage>-<lpage>1259</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J&amp;#246;rgens, K. (1954) &amp;#220;ber die L&amp;#246;sungen der Differentialgleichung rt – s&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 1, Mathematische Annalen, 127, 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01361114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calabi, E. (1958) Improper Affine Hyperspheres of Convex Type and a Generalization of a Theorem by K.J&amp;#246;rgens. Michigan Mathematical Journal, 5, 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1028998055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pogorelov, A.V. (1975) The Multidimensional Minkowski Problem. Nauka, Moscow.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pogorelov, A.V. (1988) The multidimensional Monge-Ampère equation det&amp;#8214;z&lt;sub&gt;ij&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;#8214; = &amp;#632; (z&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;, …, z&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;, z, x&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;, …, x&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;), Nauka, Moscow.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhdanov, R.Z. (1988) General Solution of the Multidimensional Monge-Ampère Equation. In: Symmetry Analysis and Solutions of Equations of Mathematical Physics (Russian), Academy of Sciences of Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Institute of Mathematics, Kiev, 13-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mokhov, O.I. and Nutku, Y. (1994) Bianchi Transformation between the Real Hyperbolic Monge-Ampère Equation and the Born-Infeld Equation. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 32, 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00739421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Udri&amp;#351;te, C. and B&amp;#238;l&amp;#259;, N. (1999) Symmetry Lie Group of the Monge-Ampère Equation. Applied Sciences, 1, 60-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Ji-Xiang and Yau, Shing-Tung (2007) A Monge-Ampère-Type Equation Motivated by String Theory. Communications in Analysis and Geometry, 15, 29-75.https://doi.org/10.4310/CAG.2007.v15.n1.a2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Ji-Xiang and Yau, Shing-Tung. (2008) The Theory of Superstring with Flux on non-K&amp;#228;hler Manifolds and the Complex Monge-Ampère Equation. Journal of Differential Geometry, 78, 369-428. https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1207834550</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yau, S.-T. and Nadis, S. (2010) The Shape of Inner Space. String Theory and the Geometry of the Universe’s Hidden Dimensions. Basic Books, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, F. and Trudinger, N.S. (2018) On the Second Boundary Value Problem for Monge-Ampère Type Equations and Geometric Optics. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 229, 547-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-018-1222-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yau, S.-T. and Nadis, S. (2019) The Shape of a Life. One Mathematician’s Search for the Universe’s Hidden Geometry. Yale University Press, New Haven.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awanou, G. (2021) Computational Nonimaging Geometric Optics: Monge-Ampère. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 68, 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti2220</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fushchich, W.I., Shtelen, W.M. and Serov, N.I. (1993) Symmetry Analysis and Exact Solutions of Equations of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3198-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lie</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1895</year>)<article-title>Zur allgemeinen Theorie der partiellen Differentialgleichungen beliebiger Ordnung. Berichte S&amp;#228;chs. Ges</article-title><source></source><volume> 47</volume>,<fpage> 53</fpage>-<lpage>128</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ovsiannikov, L.V. (1982) Group Analysis of Differential Equations. Academic Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-531680-4.50012-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Olver, P.J. (1986) Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations. In: Hersh, P., Vakil, R. andWunsch, J., Eds., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0274-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fushchich, V.I., Barannik, L.F. and Barannik, A.F. (1991) Subgroup Analysis of Galilei and Poincaré Groups and the Reduction of Nonlinear Equations. Naukova Dumka, Kiev.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X.X., Liu, H.Z. and Chang, L.N. (2020) Invariant Subspaces and Exact Solutions to the Generalized Strongly Dispersive DGH Equation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 8, 1654-1663. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2020.88126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q., Xiong, M. and Chen, L. (2020) Exact Solutions of Two Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations by the First Integral Method. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 10, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2020.101002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fedorchuk, V. and Fedorchuk, V. (2016) On Classification of Symmetry Reductions for the Eikonal Equation. Symmetry, 8, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym8060051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fedorchuk, V. and Fedorchuk, V. (2018) Classification of Symmetry Reductions for the Eikonal Equation. Pidstryhach Institute for Applied Problems of Mechanics and Mathematics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fushchich, W.I. and Nikitin, A.G. (1980) Reduction of the Representations of the Generalized Poincaré Algebra by the Galilei Algebra. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13, 2319-2330. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/7/015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128954-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fedorchuk, V.M. and Fedorchuk, V.I. (2006) On Classification of the Low-Dimensional Nonconjugate Subalgebras of the Lie Algebra of the Poincaré Group &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;(1,4). Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine, 3, 302-308.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>