<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Analytical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8251</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajac.2023.1411028</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC-128769</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Five Index Components in Danhong Injection
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yun</surname><given-names>An</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Tian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qinglin</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xingchu</surname><given-names>Gong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chenchen</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Shandong Danhong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Heze, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Innovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Pharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>College of Pharmaceutical Engineering of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Heze Medical College, Heze, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>481</fpage><lpage>492</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The purpose of this study was to establish a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the simultaneous determination of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, rosmarinic acid, salvianolic acid B, and 4-coumaric acid in Danhong injection. The chromatographic method employed was as follows: the column was a Welch Ultimate XB-C18 column (250 mm &#215; 4.6 mm, 10 μm), the mobile phase was a gradient elution of 0.4% formic acid aqueous solution (A) and acetonitrile (B), the detection wavelengths were 280 nm for sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, and salvianolic acid B and 326 nm for 4-coumaric acid and rosmarinic acid, the sample volume was 10 μL, the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the column temperature was 35&#176;C. This method can realize the separation and determination of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, rosmarinic acid, salvianolic acid B, and 4-coumaric acid within 50 minutes. The linear relationships of the five peak areas and their concentrations are good (R
  <sup>2</sup>&gt; 0.9997). The precision RSD values are all less than 1.0%. The reproducibility RSD values are all less than 1.3%. The stability RSD values are all less than 2.2%. The recovery values ranged from 92.4% to 99.4%. This method is simple, accurate, and reproducible. It can be used for the determination of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, rosmarinic acid, salvianolic acid B, and 4-coumaric acid in Danhong injection.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Danhong Injection</kwd><kwd> High Performance Liquid Chromatography</kwd><kwd> Phenolic Acid</kwd><kwd> Flavonoids</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Danhong injection is a traditional Chinese medicine formula prepared from two medicinal herbs of Danshen (Salviae miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma) and Honghua (Carthami flos) through processes such as water extraction and alcohol precipitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref2">2</xref>] . It has the efficacy of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis, as well as regulating channels and collaterals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref4">4</xref>] . The main components of Danhong injection include phenolic acids, flavonoids, quinones, nucleosides, sugars, fatty acids, and pigments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref6">6</xref>] . Among them, the phenolic acid components of Danshen include danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, rosmarinic acid, and salvianolic acid B, which have activities such as anti-myocardial ischemia, expanding coronary arteries, reducing intracellular cholesterol synthesis, and inhibiting lipoprotein oxidation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref9">9</xref>] . The flavonoid components of Honghua include 4-coumaric acid and others, which have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immune regulation activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref10">10</xref>] . The phenolic acid components of Danshen and the flavonoid components of Honghua are considered to be the main active ingredients in Danhong injection.</p><p>Yang Jing et al. reported the application of the UPLC-UV method in the stability study of multiple active components in Danhong injection, including sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, rosmarinic acid, adenine, thymine, cytosine and uracil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref11">11</xref>] . Dou Jiaojiao et al. applied an HPLC-DAD device to determine six components, including danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, caffeic acid, and rosmarinic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref12">12</xref>] . Zhang Xiaodong et al. used ultra high performance liquid chromatography to determine the content of danshensu and protocatechuic aldehyde in Danhong injection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref13">13</xref>] . You Huilian used HPLC to determine the content of four water-soluble components in Danhong Injection, namely sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, and rosmarinic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref14">14</xref>] . Li Guosong et al. developed a UPLC method to determine the content of five components in Danhong Injection, including sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, protocatechuic acid, rosmarinic acid, and salvianolic acid B [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref15">15</xref>] . However, the methods in the literature mainly focused on the determination of phenolic acids and nucleosides, lacking the quantitative research on the flavonoid components of Honghua. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new analytical methods.</p><p>In this study, a fast and effective analysis method was established by using two UV detection wavelengths simultaneously to detect the five main active components in Danhong Injection, including sodium Danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, 4-coumaric acid, rosmarinic acid and salvianolic acid B. This method is expected to be helpful to improve the quality control level of Danhong Injection.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Instruments, Materials, and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Instruments</title><p>High-performance liquid chromatography (1260, Agilent Company, USA) equipped with a degasser, quaternary gradient pump, automatic sampler, column temperature box, and UV detector; water bath pot (XMTE-8112, Shanghai Jinghong Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd.); pure water machine (Direct Q, Hangzhou Jingyuan Technology Co., Ltd.); electronic balance (SE6001, Aarhus Instruments Co., Ltd.); precision electronic balance (XSR105, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland); and ultrasonic cleaning machine (LMDTC, LUMTECH, Germany) were used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Materials</title><p>Acetonitrile (chromatographically pure, Merck, Germany), methanol (chromatographically pure, Merck, Germany), and formic acid (chromatographically pure, Shanghai Jizhi Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) were used. Danhong injection was provided by Shandong Danhong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Salvianolic acid B (HPLC &gt; 98%, Shanghai Ronghe Pharmaceutical Technology Development Co., Ltd., batch number: 200602), sodium danshensu (HPLC ≥ 98%, Shanghai Ronghe Pharmaceutical Technology Development Co., Ltd., batch number: 171027), rosmarinic acid (HPLC ≥ 98%, Shanghai Ronghe Pharmaceutical Technology Development Co., Ltd., batch number: 150901), protocatechuic aldehyde (HPLC &gt; 98%, Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd., batch number A28GS147304), and 4-coumaric acid (HPLC &gt; 98%, Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., batch number: H2121244501-98-4) were purchased and used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Chromatographic Conditions</title><p>Welch Ultimate XB-C18 chromatographic column (250 mm &#215; 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used. The mobile phase was composed of 0.4% formic acid water (A) and acetonitrile (B). A gradient elution was used. The elution procedure is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The detection wavelengths were 280 nm (sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B) and 326 nm (4-coumaric acid, rosmarinic acid). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The column temperature was 35˚C. The injection volume was 10 μL. The chromatography figures are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Preparation of Mixed Reference Solution</title><p>Appropriate amounts of each reference standard, sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, rosmarinic acid, salvianolic acid B, and 4-coumaric acid, were weighed accurately. They were placed in a volumetric flask, and a 20% acetonitrile aqueous solution containing 0.4% formic acid was added to dilute to the mark to prepare mixed reference solutions with concentrations of 1.34, 0.266, 0.356, 0.328, and 0.500 mg/mL, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Gradient elution procedure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >time (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 - 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 - 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 - 74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 - 74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 - 24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 - 60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 - 2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Preparation of Sample Solution</title><p>Two milliliters of Danhong injection were accurately measured and placed in a 10 mL volumetric flask. A certain volume of 20% acetonitrile aqueous solution containing 0.4% formic acid was added. Then the volumetric flask was placed in an ultrasonic environment and heated. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, and then the volume was adjusted, shaken well, and filtered to obtain the sample solution.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Investigation of the Linear Relationship</title><p>The mixed reference solution prepared in Section 2.4 was diluted gradiently to prepare a series of mixed reference solutions with different concentrations. The samples were analyzed under the above mentioned chromatographic conditions. The standard curve was calibrated using the concentration as the horizontal coordinate (X) and the peak area as the vertical coordinate (Y). The regression equation was calculated. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, indicating that sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, rosmarinic acid, salvianolic acid B, and 4-coumaric acid all have good linear relationships within their respective linear ranges.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Precision Test</title><p>The sample solutions were prepared according to the method described in Section 2.5. The same sample solution was injected continuously 6 times, and then the peak areas of each component were determined under the chromatographic conditions described above. The RSD values of the peak areas of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, 4-coumaric acid, and rosmarinic acid were 0.61%, 0.63%, 0.97%, 0.54%, and 0.69%, respectively, all of which are less than 1.0%. This indicates that the instrument precision was good.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Repeatability Test</title><p>The sample solution was prepared according to the method described in Section2.5. Six samples were prepared in parallel and injected into the chromatographic system to determine the contents of each component under the chromatographic conditions described above. The RSD values of the contents of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, 4-coumaric acid, and rosmarinic acid were 0.85%, 0.75%, 1.28%, 0.87%, and 1.08%, respectively,</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Linear relationship inspection</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Linear equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Linear range (mg/mL)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium danshensu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 6749.18X + 45.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.041 - 1.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protocatechuic aldehyde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 44313.2X + 71.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008 - 0.261</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salvianolic acid B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 10344.9X + 4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011 - 0.348</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-Coumaric acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 38777.1X + 5.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002 - 0.049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rosmarinic Acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 27828.3X + 46.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010 - 0.321</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>all of which are less than 1.3%. This indicates that the repeatability of this method was good.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Stability Test</title><p>The sample solution was prepared according to the method described in Section 2.5. The solutions were analyzed under the chromatographic conditions described above after being prepared for 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours. The RSD values of the peak areas of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, 4-coumaric acid, and rosmarinic acid were 2.18%, 0.63%, 0.40%, 1.03%, and 1.09%, respectively, all of which are less than 2.2%. This indicates that the sample solution was stable within 24 hours.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Sample Recovery Test</title><p>With a precision pipette, 2 mL of Danhong injection was taken and placed in a 10 mL volumetric flask. A total of 6 samples were prepared, and each sample was added to a certain concentration of mixed reference solution. Then, a 20% acetonitrile aqueous solution containing 0.4% formic acid was added to adjust the volume to the mark. The solution was mixed well, and used as the test solution. Under the chromatographic conditions described above, the recovery rate was calculated by injecting the test solution into the chromatographic system. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The recovery rates of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, 4-coumaric acid, and rosmarinic acid were between 98.2% and 101%, 95.0% and 96.6%, 93.6% and 97.7%, 93.5% and 100%, and 91.1% and 94.3%, respectively. The RSD values of all components were less than 3%. The results showed that the recovery values of the five components are good.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Content Determination</title><p>Ten batches of samples were prepared according to the method described in Section2.5. Then their contents were measured. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The average contents of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, 4-coumaric acid, and rosmarinic acid were 1.36 mg/g, 0.173 mg/g, 0.308 mg/g, 0.0299 mg/g, and 0.248 mg/g, respectively. Among them, the content of sodium danshensu was the highest, ranging from 1.24 to 1.40 mg/g, while the content of 4-coumaric acid was the lowest, ranging from 0.0283 to 0.0316 mg/g.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Selection of Detection Wavelength</title><p>In this study, the UV spectra of the analytes were measured, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, and salvianolic acid B have strong UV absorption at 280 nm. While 4-coumaric acid and rosmarinic acid have strong UV absorption near 320 nm. Therefore dual wavelength detection was selected in this work.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Acidity of the Mobile Phase</title><p>Our research group used the liquid‒liquid equilibrium method to determine the dissociation constants of various salvianolic acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref16">16</xref>] . Among them, the pK<sub>a</sub></p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Results of sample addition recovery test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Added amount (mg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measured amount (mg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate of recovery (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average recovery rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RSD (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Sodium danshensu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >99.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Protocatechuic aldehyde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.621</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >95.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >0.616</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.616</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.616</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.616</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Salvianolic acid B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >95.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >1.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4-Coumaric acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >98.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Rosmarinic Acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >92.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >1.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Content determination results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Batch number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium danshensu (mg/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protocatechuic aldehyde (mg/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salvianolic acid B (mg/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4-Coumaric acid (mg/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rosmarinic acid (mg/g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22061020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.273</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22061021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.369</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.271</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22061014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.242</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22062015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22082017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.246</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22082033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.245</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22041025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.240</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21102001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.341</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.261</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22051028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.252</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22041023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.218</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average value (mg/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.173</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0299</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.248</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation (mg/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0582</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0172</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>value of Danshensu ranges from 3.49 to 3.80. The pK<sub>a</sub> value of rosmarinic acid ranges from 2.75 to 3.12. The pK<sub>a1</sub> value of salvianolic acid B ranges from 2.24 to 2.40, and the pK<sub>a2</sub> value ranges from 3.20 to 3.63 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref16">16</xref>] . Mobile phase A was 0.4% formic acid, and its pH value was tested to be 2.37. At this pH value, most of the above mentioned components exist in their molecular form. Due to the use of reversed-phase chromatography for separation, the presence of salvianolic acid components in molecular form is more advantageous for the chromatographic column to retain them, thus enabling better separation of these phenolic acids.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Chemical Constituents in Danhong Injection</title><p>Sodium danshensu is a degradation product of salvianolic acid B. When at a higher pH value or temperature, salvianolic acid B degrades faster and forms danshensu and lithospermic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref20">20</xref>] . In the production of Danhong injection, water extraction is used, which can accelerate the degradation of salvianolic acid B to produce sodium danshensu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref22">22</xref>] . Compared to Salvianolic acid B, sodium danshensu is a smaller molecular weight product with higher water solubility. Danshensu is less likely to form precipitation in an injection. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, it can be seen that the content of sodium danshensu in Danhong injection is relatively high, while the content of salvianolic acid B is relatively low, which is beneficial for the stability of Danhong injection during its shelf life.</p><p>In Chinese Pharmacopia (2020 Edition), hydroxysafflor yellow A is the indicator component of Honghua. In previous work, it is observed that the content</p><p>of hydroxysafflor yellow A was higher than that of rosmarinic acid in the water extract of mixed Danshen and Honghua [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128769-ref23">23</xref>] . However, the content of hydroxysafflor yellow A in Danhong injection is very low. Accordingly, hydroxysafflor yellow A is not determined in this work. 4-Coumaric acid is a degradation product of hydroxysafflor yellow A. Heating and pH adjustment processes in industrial production may be the causes of hydroxysafflor yellow A degradation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, a method for the determination of sodium danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, 4-coumaric acid, and rosmarinic acid in Danhong injection using HPLC equipment was established. The method employed a Welch Ultimate XB-C18 column (250 mm &#215; 4.6 mm, 5 μm) as the stationary phase, with a gradient elution system composed of 0.4% formic acid-water (A) and acetonitrile (B) as the mobile phase. Detection wavelengths were set at 280 nm and 326 nm. The method has been validated to be accurate, reliable, and reproducible. This method can be used for the quantification of the five analytes in Danhong Injection. The method can simultaneously determine the contents of four phenolic acids and a flavonoid component, which is beneficial for improving the quality control level of Danhong Injection. In future, the methods of quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker (QAMS) are expected to be developed for simultaneously determining components in Danhong injection with smaller amount of reference substance.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Data Availability Statement</title><p>This published article includes all data generated or analyzed during this study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Funding</title><p>This research was funded by the Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of the National Administration of Chinese Medicine, grant number ZYYCXTD-D-202002, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, grant number 226-2022-00226.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>An, Y., Tian, T., Wang, Q.L., Gong, X.C. and Wang, C.C. (2023) A High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Five Index Components in Danhong Injection. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 14, 481-492. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2023.1411028</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.128769-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J.X., Qi, M.J., Shi, M.Z., Chen, J.J., Zhang, X.Q. and Yang, J. (2019) Effects of Danhong Injection, a Traditional Chinese Medicine, on Nine Cytochrome P450 Isoforms in Vitro. Biomedical Chromatography, 33, e4454. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.4454</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, W.Z., Xie, X.Y., Yang, J.Y., Zhao, F., Pan, J.Y. and Qu, H.B. (2022) NMR Method for Simultaneous Determination of 21 Chemical Components in Danhong Injection. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 47, 6399-6408. https://doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20220419.301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hao, L.J., Lang, A.H., Fan, C.Z. and Song, J.Y. (2020) Production and Quality Control of Original Herbal Materials of Danhong Injection. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 45, 5443-5451. http://dx.doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20200915.302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peng, S.X., Wei, C., Lei, J.Y., Zhang, T. and Ding, Y.B. (2023) Network Meta-Analysis of Chinese Medicine Injections for Activating Blood and Resolving Stasis in Adjuvant Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 48, 4215-4230. https://dx.doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230425.501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bi, C., Li, P.L., Zhang, W.J., Liu, H., Yi, J., Peng, W., et al. (2018) Correlation between Raw Herbs and Chemical Compounds in Danhong Injection. Central South Pharmacy, 16, 433-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20200915.302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, L.L., Shang, Z.P., Bo, T., Sun, L., Guo, Q.L., Qiao, X. and Ye, M. (2019) Rapid Quantitation and Identification of the Chemical Constituents in Danhong Injection by Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1606, Article ID: 460378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460378</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zuo, R., Xiao, M.J., Xu, D.P., Zheng, C.Y., Wang, W. and He, R.R. (2022) Salvianolic Acid a from Danhong Injection Induces Vasorelaxation by Regulating L-Type Calcium Channel in Isolated Mouse Arteries. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 296, Article ID: 115431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2022.115431</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Q.Q., Yuan, H.Y., Wang, L.T., Gan, X.H. and Qiao, C.D. (2011) Separation and Determination of Water-Soluble Active Components in Danhong Injection by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis. Journal of Lanzhou University (Medical Sciences), 37, 28-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.13885/j.issn.1000-2812.2011.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nijat, D., Xu, L., Kuang, Y., Yu, R., Zhang, Y. and Hasan, A. (2022) A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Study to Elucidate the Cardiovascular Protective Constituents in Danhong Injection. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 219, Article ID: 114953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114953</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guan, X.Q., Mao, J.L., Tang, Y.X., Wang, J.H. and Sun, R. (2018) Research Progress on Pharmacological Effects of P-Coumaric Acid. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 49, 4162-4170. http://dx.doi.org/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2018.17.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, J., Liu, H.T., Wang, Y.F. and Zhu, Y. (2012) Study on the Stability of Multiple Bioactive Compounds in Danhong Injection by UPLC-UV Method. Tianjin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 29, 579-582.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Du, J.J., Qu, X.L. and Qi, Z. (2019) Determination of Components in Danhong Injection by HPLC. Orld Chinese Medicine, 14, 1373-1377.http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2019.06.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X.D., Cao, Z.X., Li, X.L., Lu, J., Song, Y.X. and Tang, J.F. (2015) Determination of Danshensu and Protocatechualdehyde in Danhong Injection by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Acta Chinese Medicine, 4, 554-556.https://doi.org/10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999.2015.04.191</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">You, H.L., Wang, B. and Xu, H.L. (2012) Determination of Four Hydrosoluble Components in Danhong Injection by HPLC. Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs, 26, 743-746. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-7777.2012.07.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, G.S. and Hu, L.Z. (2015) Determination of 5 Water-Soluble Components in Danhong Injection by Hplc Method. Journal of North Pharmacy, 3, 1414-1415.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gong, X.C., Huang, S.H., Jiao, R.N., Pan, J.Y., Li, Y. and Qu, H.B. (2016) The Determination of Dissociation Constants for Active Ingredients from Herbal Extracts Using a Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium Method. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 409, 447-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pan, J.Y., Gong, X.C. and Qu, H.B. (2016) Degradation Kinetics and Mechanism of Lithospermic Acid under Low Oxygen Condition Using Quantitative H-1 NMR with Hplc-Ms. PLOS ONE, 11, e0164421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, Y.X., Zhang, D.J., Wang, H., Xiu, Z.L., Wang, L.X. and Xiao, H.B. (2007) Hydrolytic Kinetics of Lithospermic Acid B Extracted from Roots of Salvia Miltiorrhiza. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 43, 435-439.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.07.046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kan, S., Lin, H., Li, J., Shao, L. and Chen, D. (2012) Biotransformation of Salvianolic Acid B by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum and Its Two Degradation Routes. Natural Product Communications, 7, 885-888.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, L.N., Zhang, X., Xu, W.Z., Ma, X.N., Jia, Z. and Zheng, Y.M. (2011) Studies on the Stability of Salvianolic Acid B as Potential Drug Material. Phytochemical Analysis: PCA, 22, 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.1291</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, H.J., Cho, J.Y. and Moon, J.H. (2012) Chemical Conversions of Salvianolic Acid B by Decoction in Aqueous Solution. Fitoterapia, 83, 1196-1204.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2012.06.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gong, X.C., Huang, S.C., Pan, J.Y. and Qu. H.B. (2017) Modeling of Degradation Kinetics of Salvianolic Acid B at Different Temperatures and Ph Values. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 68-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.06.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128769-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y., Guo, Z.-T., Gong, X.-C. and Qu, H.-B. (2013) Simultaneous Determination of Danshensu, Hydroxysafflor Yellow A, Rosmarinic Acid, Lithospermic Acid, Salvianolic Acid B in Water Extract of Mixed Salviae miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma and Carthami flos by HPLC. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 38, 1653-1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.4268/cjcmm20131101</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>