<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2023.1410092</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-128637</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of the Productivity of Intercropping Plantain Cultivar (PITA 3) Fertilized with Two Types of Manure, under Coconut Tree Based (&lt;i&gt;Cocos&lt;/i&gt; nucifera L.), on the Tertiary Sands of C&#244;te d’Ivoire
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pierre-Marie</surname><given-names>Janvier Coffi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joséphine</surname><given-names>Tamia Ama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thierry</surname><given-names>Tacra Lekadou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Siaka</surname><given-names>Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Charly</surname><given-names>Fernand Agoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Didier</surname><given-names>Martial Saraka Yao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Biochemistry-Genetics, UFR of Biological Sciences, Péléforo Gon Coulibaly University, Korhogo, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Centre National de Recherche Agronomique, Station de Recherche Marc DELORME, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Geosciences and Environment Laboratory, Environmental Sciences and Management Training and Research Unit (UFR), Nangui Abrogoua University (UNA), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1405</fpage><lpage>1419</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Pressure on land tenure is having a negative impact on the coconut sector, reducing farmers’ incomes. Intercropping cultivars plantain under coconut based has been considered as a solution to this problem. The aim of this work is to diversify the sources of income for coconut growers. The plantain variety PITA 3, popularised by the CNRA, was grown in coconut inter-rows (PB113
  <sup>+</sup>), with two types of manure (chemical, organic). Six (06) treatments D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6 were studied. In the tenth month after planting, treatment D3, which included banana plants fertilised with 9 kg of manure/plant, got the best agromorphological performance: height (264.08 cm), neck circumference (57.68 cm) and 12 leaves. In terms of production parameters, D3 banana plants had a shorter production cycle (347 days) and the highest diet mass (9.3 kg). However, the plants that received no fertiliser (D6) showed stunted growth and were unable to produce brunch. The fertilization of plantain with 10 t/ha of laying hen droppings permitted good development and production of plantains on tertiary sands.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Intercropping</kwd><kwd> Coconut</kwd><kwd> Plantain PITA 3</kwd><kwd> Manure</kwd><kwd> Tertiary Sands</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>C&#244;te d’Ivoire is the leading coconut plantation in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref1">1</xref>] , with several industrial plantations and numerous small private farms, mainly located on the tertiary to quaternary sands along the coast, on which more than 20,000 families depend [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref2">2</xref>] . Coconut plays a key role in people’s lives in terms of social and economic uses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>However, the majority of this coconut field is planted with the local variety, Grand Ouest Africain (GOA), which has a low yield and low density (143 trees/ha) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref4">4</xref>] . In addition to the biotic difficulties (pests, diseases), this coconut plantation is under ever-increasing land pressure, which is considerably reducing the area available for cultivation. This situation is leading to a drop in yields and, consequently, in people’s incomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref3">3</xref>] . To remedy the situation, research is proposing to renew the coconut plantations with improved, resistant varieties at high planting densities, and to grow alternative crops such as plantain in the coconut inter-rows.</p><p>Indeed, sold on the market, plantain contributes to the GDP of countries in Central and West Africa, helps to diversify people’s incomes and thus helps to reduce poverty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref5">5</xref>] . Plantain is one of the main sources of carbohydrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref6">6</xref>] and feeds many people around the world, particularly in tropical countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref7">7</xref>] . In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, plantain is the third most important food crop, after yam and cassava, with average annual production estimated at around 1.7 million tonnes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref8">8</xref>] . However, plantain is one of the staple foods of the Ivorian population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref9">9</xref>] , and despite its socio-economic importance, large-scale plantain cultivation is confined to the East, Centre-West and West zones, where soil conditions are favourable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref10">10</xref>] . As a result, this commodity is often irregular on local markets.</p><p>In the coastal zone, plantain cultivation techniques remain rudimentary, using very few inputs. In addition, farmers who grow plantain mainly use the Corne 1 variety, which has limited intrinsic capacity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref11">11</xref>] . This variety has poor resistance to disease and is mainly grown in areas where there is a lot of humidity at all times, such as low-lying areas, rubbish dumps and around houses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>It is therefore necessary to test other, better-performing varieties in order to meet the ever-increasing market demand for plantain. The aim of this study is therefore to find an ideal technical itinerary for growing and intercropping the high-yielding PITA 3 plantain, popularised by the CNRA under coconut base, on the tertiary sands of C&#244;te d’Ivoire.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Study Site</title><p>The study was carried out at the Marc DELORME research station, on the coast in south-eastern C&#244;te d’Ivoire. The station is located on littoral, in Abidjan district southern C&#244;te d’Ivoire, between 3˚82' - 3˚87' West longitude and 5˚26' - 5˚29' North latitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The soil pH is acid, around 5, in depths 0 - 20 and 20 - 40 cm. it is consists</p><p>mainly of fine sand (over 80%) with very little silt and clay (less than 10% each).</p><p>The soil composition in chemical of elements and exchangeable bases at the beginning of the trial, analysed at the Laboratory of the National Soil Bureau of Burkina Faso (BUNASOLS), are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The climate is characterized by four seasons: two dry seasons and two rainy</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of chemical elements and exchangeable bases in the plot</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O.M. (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P ass (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K disp (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 20 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 40 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cation and CEC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup> (meq/100 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup> (meq/100 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup> (meq/100 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup> (meq/100 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S (meq/100 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEC (meq/100 g)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 20 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 40 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.78</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 ppm = 1 mg/kg, O.M.: Organic matter, CEC: Exchangeable bases.</p><p>seasons. For the dry seasons, the longest covers the months of December to March and the shortest goes from August to September. For the rainy seasons, the longest covers April to July and the shortest goes from October to November. Over the decade from 2012 to 2021, average monthly rainfall ranged from 33.4 mm (January) to 464.1 mm (June) and temperatures from 25.3˚C (September) to 28.3˚C (April) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The sunshine was around 2000 hours a year<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and relative humidity fluctuated between 80% and 90%.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Plant Material</title><p>Plantains suckers, PITA 3 variety, averaging 60 cm in height and with a production potential of 30 t/ha (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)), were selected for the trial. They were planted between rows of PB113<sup>+</sup> (NRC &#215; GRL<sup>+</sup>), eighteen months old, with an average of 4 living leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). PB 113<sup>+</sup> is a high-yield hybrid (4 to 6 t/ha/year), produced by the National Center of Agricultural Research (CNRA, C&#244;te d’Ivoire), characterised by its early production (3 to 4 years).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Fertilisers</title><p>Two types of fertilisations (chemical and organic) were used in this study. Chemical fertilisation was carried out using urea and potassium chloride. Organic fertilisation was carried out using laying hen droppings, composted during 6 months. Dolomite was applied to all plantain’s suckers at planting.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Methods</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Fertilisation and Maintenance</title><p>Chemical fertilisation with urea was carried out according to the dose recommended by Kouam&#233; et al. (2014), for plantain. Thus, on the basis of 380 g of urea provided per plantain banana tree to constitute treatment D4, the equivalent in hen droppings, 6 kg, was spread around the banana trees in D1. Based on these two types of fertilization (chemical and organic), three (03) other fertilization were applied to the banana plants: half the reference dose of droppings (1/2 &#215; 6 kg of droppings) for the banana plants in D2; three halves (3/2) the reference</p><p>dose applied to the banana plants in D3; and another fertilisation applied to the plantains in D5, based on half the reference doses of urea and laying hen droppings.</p><p>A total of six treatments were carried out:</p><p>T0: Pure Coconut trees (main crop);</p><p>D1: Coconut and plantain trees fertilized with 06 kg of manure;</p><p>D2: Coconut and plantain trees fertilised with 03 kg of manure;</p><p>D3: Coconut and plantain trees fertilised with 09 kg of manure;</p><p>D4: Coconut and plantain trees fertilised with the reference chemical fertiliser, 380 g of urea and 400 g of potassium chloride;</p><p>D5: Coconut and plantain trees fertilized with urea and chicken droppings (190 g urea + 3 kg chicken droppings);</p><p>D6: Coconut with banana without manure.</p><p>Weeding was carried out along the banana rows on a monthly basis, to reduce the effect of competition with weeds. Regular leaf-stripping was also carried out on the plantain trees to reduce the risk of leaf diseases, that could lead to the death of the plant. The suckers were planted at the beginning of the short rainy season, in early October 2019. During dry periods, the banana plants were irrigated with 15 litres of water/day/plant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Experimental Design</title><p>A Fisher system containing 03 blocks and 07 completely randomised treatments was set up on plot 074 covering an area of 1.4 ha.</p><p>A total of 21 sub-plots were set up (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Each sub-plot consisted of ten (10) plantain trees and four (4) useful coconut trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The configuration of plantain in the field (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), was 2 m between two plants and 2 m between plantains rows (2 &#215; 2 m), which represented a density of 1110 plants/ha. The density of coconut plantation was 160 plants/ha, that means a configuration of 7.35 m &#215; 8.5 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Variables Measured</title><p>Observations were made on plantain trees in treatments D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6. Measurements of the banana plants were taken from the third month after planting to the tenth month after planting (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The vegetative growth parameters determined at monthly intervals were the height to the last V formed by leaves of the plant, the circumference at 10 cm from the ground of pseudo-stem and the number of functional leaves. From flowering onwards, the time intervals Planting-Flowering, Planting-Cutting and Flowering-Cutting were monitored. At harvest, the masses of the bunches obtained were compared (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Statistical Analysis of Data</title><p>Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM software, Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 16.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, New York, USA). The agromorphological data of the banana plants were subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences between the agromorphological parameters measured were identified using the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison of means test with a threshold of 5% (α = 0.05). The Microsoft Office 2013 Excel spreadsheet was used to produce curves and histograms to monitor changes in the variables studied.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Definition of measurement periods for growth parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Definition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Third month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fourth month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fifth month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Six months after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seventh month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eighth month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ninth month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tenth month after planting plantain suckers</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Parameters measured on banana plants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable measured</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Method</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Vegetative growth parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height to the last V formed by leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Measured with a tape measure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circumference 10 cm above ground</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of living leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >List</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Production parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flowering planting interval (FPI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Days</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >List</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interval Planting Regime cut (IPC)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flowering interval Diet cut (IFC)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average weight of plans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weighing on the scales</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Agromorphological Characteristics</title><p>&#183; Height</p><p>The Newman Keul statistical test at the 5% threshold (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), shows significant differences between plantain heights after TIME 1, which is 3 months after the planting suckers (F = 0.25; P = 0.94).</p><p>The average height of the plantains varied between 82 and 222.18 cm from TIME 1 to TIME 8. The greatest performance at TIME 8 was that of D3 plantains (264.08 cm), followed by D1 plantains (239.53 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). The lowest height of plantains was obtained in D4, where values rose from 81.73 (TIME 1) to 193.76 cm (TIME 8). The growth of D6 banana plants stopped at the eighth month (TIME 6) and the value reached at this stage was 90.19 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p><p>&#183; Circumference</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Indicative values for the Newman Keul test for comparing heights</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Modalities</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ddl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Medium squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2293.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8338.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15870.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >388.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27297.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >561.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42942.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >578.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205454.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3006.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267207.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5919.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The Newman Keul statistical test at the 5% threshold indicates significant differences between neck circumferences after TIME 1, which means 3 months after the shoots were planted (F = 1.57; P = 0.17) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>The circumferences of the plantains varied between 20.46 and 47.33 cm. The tenth month (TIME 8) was marked by strong growth in circumference for D3 banana plants (57.68 cm). At this stage, the smallest circumference (41.38 cm) was that of T4 plantains. The growth in circumference of T6 plantains stopped in the eighth month after the suckers were planted. At this stage, the circumference was 25.11 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p><p>&#183; Number of functional leaves</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, shows significant differences in the number of functional plantain leaves after TIME 1, which is 3 months after transplanting (F = 0.48; P = 0.79). The number of functional plantain leaves increased from 5.1 to 9.15 on average during the observations, except for the leaves at D6. The maximum number of leaves obtained at TIME 8 was 12 for D3 plantain followed by D1 (10.03 leaves) and D5 (9.29 leaves). D4 and D2 plantains had the fewest functional leaves (7.43 and 6.97 respectively) at the tenth month. For D6, a drop in the number of functional leaves was observed from TIME 1 (5.07 leaves) to TIME 6 (2.63 leaves) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Indicative values of the Newman Keul test for comparing neck circumferences</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ddl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Medium squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >415.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >719.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1189.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2270.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11011.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >923.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12271.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >953.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Indicative values of the Newman Keul test for the comparison of functional plantain leaves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ddl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Medium squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >576.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >393.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >309.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TIME 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >519.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1086.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Production Parameters</title>Planting-Flowering, Planting-Cutting and Flowering-Cutting Intervals<p>The interval of time Planting-Flowering (IPF), varied from 264 to 282 days, with significant differences depending on treatments (F = 24.52; P &lt; 0.001). Of all the Planting-Flowering intervals (IPF) obtained, the shortest was for D3 plants (264 days), followed immediately by D1 plantain (279 days) and those of D5 (281</p><p>days). The highest number of days was obtained by plants in the reference chemical treatment (D4), with a value of 287 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><p>Planting-Cutting intervals (IPC) were statistically differentiated by treatment (F = 29; P &lt; 0.001). The lowest number of days was for D3 plants fertilised with 9 kg of chicken droppings/plantain (347 days), followed by D1 plants fertilised with 6 kg of chicken droppings/plantain (364 days). D4 plantains had the longest planting-cutting interval at 373 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><p>Concerning Flowering-Cutting interval (IFC), no significant difference was observed in this parameter. The different treatments showed statistically identical values of between 83 and 86 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Brunch Mass</title><p>The different treatments applied to the plantain had a significant effect on bunch weight (F = 186.13 and P &lt; 0.001). At the end of the cycle, plantain of D6 (Control with no manure applied) did not produce any bunches. Those in D3 had the highest bunch mass (9.3 kg), followed by the plantains in D1 with 8.36 kg. Brunches from (D4) had the lowest mass at 5.1 kg (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>Fertilised PITA 3 plantains showed better agromorphological performance than unfertilised ones (D6). This lack of improvement in the performance of unfertilised plants indicates the positive effect of fertilisers on plantain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref12">12</xref>] , and the usefulness of fertilisers in sandy soil cultivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref13">13</xref>] . The number of leaves, height and circumference of D3 plants (9 kg of chicken droppings per banana plant) were highest at the tenth month with values of 12 cm; 264.08 cm and 57.68 cm respectively. These performances were immediately followed by those of the D1 banana plants (6 kg of droppings per plant). Chicken droppings are therefore an essential mineral reserve for plantain growth and ripening. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref14">14</xref>] , the application of hen droppings provides additional quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and magnesium to the pool of mineral elements in the soil, thereby increasing the nutrient content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref15">15</xref>] . The plants would integrate the mineral elements supplied, in particular nitrogen, into their metabolism more efficiently and more slowly. For D3 plantains, the quantity of nitrogen required for development would be better conserved, unlike that available</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Duration of parameters determining plantain production</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IPF (Day)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IPC (Day)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IFC (Day)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1 (droppings 6 kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >278.5 &#177; 5.1 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >363.7 &#177; 5.4 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.2 &#177; 1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2 (droppings 3 kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >284.3 &#177; 7.8 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370.3 &#177;7.7 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.0 &#177; 5.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3 (droppings 9 kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264.2 &#177;7.4 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >347.2 &#177;7.2 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.0 &#177;1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D4 (TCHref)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287.9 &#177; 2.9 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373.5 &#177; 5.32 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.6 &#177; 3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D5 (TCH + droppings)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281.1 &#177; 4.5 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365.7 &#177; 2.23 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.6 &#177; 2.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>for D1, D2, D5 and D4 plantains. This is despite the high infiltration capacity of sandy soils. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref16">16</xref>] , organic matter contributes to the fixation of mineral elements and limits soil leaching. In this sense, leaching and the low nitrogen content of the soil, as indicated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref17">17</xref>] , would be overcome.</p><p>For the reference chemical treatment (D4), the height, circumference and number of living leaves at the tenth month of cultivation were statistically lower than for the plants in D1, D5 and particularly D3. The weakness of these parameters could be linked to three factors:</p><p>- firstly, the low presence of litter or organic matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref18">18</xref>] . The low natural content of organic matter and clay in the first 20 to 30 centimetres of sandy soils reduces the formation of colloidal matter and clay-humus complex. As a result, cation exchange is reduced, leading to low soil fertility (Koull and Halilat, 2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref16">16</xref>] ;</p><p>- then to the rapid lateral and deep infiltration of rainwater and irrigation water, which leaches out the mineral elements. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref17">17</xref>] , farmers cultivating sandy soils in C&#244;te d’Ivoire use organic matter as a fertiliser and soil improver to counter the leaching phenomenon;</p><p>- lastly, the high heat stored by sandy soils during the day (rapid heating), which would cause mineral fertilisers to react more quickly, particularly urea, which is highly susceptible to evaporation under the effect of heat. This rapid warming of the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref17">17</xref>] would also reduce the humidity around the plantain. This reduction in humidity would be more pronounced for unfertilised plants and those that have received chemical fertiliser. This would be a major limitation to root development.</p><p>Irrigation was therefore very important in maintaining humidity around the plantain. It was an essential condition for their development. The addition of organic fertiliser also improved soil structure and reduced water infiltration deep into the soil. The combination of organic matter and water promotes good humidity, adequate biological activity and better availability of mineral elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref19">19</xref>] , for the plantains needs. This result corroborates those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref20">20</xref>] , during his work on tomatoes in tertiary sandy soils. According to this author, this condition is essential for good vegetative growth and higher yields. However, the absence of fertiliser in D6 plants resulted in stunted growth and death.</p><p>The plantains in treatment D3 got interval Planting-Flowering (IPF) and Planting-Cutting (IPC) of 264 and 347 days respectively. These plantains flowered and were harvested 14 and 16 days before those of D1. This difference in cycle would be due to the cumulative effect of the height, circumference and number of leaves of the banana plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref12">12</xref>] , which were greater for the plantain of D3 than for the others. The plantain in D3, reached the flowering and fruiting stage more quickly. In the case of D4 plantain, the high leaching capacity of tertiary sandy soils led to a reduction in the mineral elements required by the plantain, which would have delayed its production cycle. The average weight of plantains bunches receiving fertiliser varied from 5.05 kg to 9.32 kg. Unfertilized plantain did not produce any bunch. In fact, the ability of plantains to produce bunches is strongly linked to the treatment applied and to good vegetative development (G&#233;raldine, 2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128637-ref21">21</xref>] . This would explain the good performance observed in D3, D1 and D5 banana plants, both in terms of parameters relating to vegetative growth (height, girth, number of living leaves) and those relating to production (short cycle, greater mass of bunches).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The study was carried out in order to highlight the effects of two types of fertilization on plantain associated with coconut. It was found that plantain of the PITA 3 variety fertilised with hen droppings performed better agromorphologically than those fertilised with chemical fertiliser and those not fertilised. Banana plants of D3 (9 kg of droppings), D1 (6 kg of droppings), D2 (3 kg of droppings) and D5 (mixture of droppings and chemical fertiliser) all achieved production. However, D3 gave the best values in terms of agromorphological parameters (height, circumference, number of leaves and production). In addition, a shorter production cycle was observed in these banana plants (D3) compared with the other treatments (D1, D2, D4 and D5).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Coffi, P.-M.J., Ama, J.T., Lekadou, T.T., Traore, S., Agoh, C.F. and Yao, D.M.S. (2023) Evaluation of the Productivity of Intercropping Plantain Cultivar (PITA 3) Fertilized with Two Types of Manure, under Coconut Tree Based (Cocos nucifera L.), on the Tertiary Sands of C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Agricultural Sciences, 14, 1405-1419. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.1410092</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.128637-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konan, B. (2011) Comparative Study of the Physico-Chemical Characteristics of the Kernel, Water and Haustorium of the Nuts of 3 Coconut Cultivars (Cocos nucifera L.) as a Function of Germination Time. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Abobo-Adjamé, Abidjan, 189 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Assa, R., Konan, K., Nemlin, J., Prades, A., Agbo, N. and Sié, R. (2006) Diagnostic de la Cocoteraie Paysanne du Littoral Ivoirien. Sciences et Nature. Série A, Biosciences Agronomie Environnement Biotechnologie, 3, 113-120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N’guessan, T.S., Kouamé, D.K., Ibo, G.J. and Taky, H.A.D. (2019) Jaunissement Mortel du Cocotier et Mutations Sociales à Grand-Lahou, C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. European Scientific Journal, 15, 130-142. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n25p130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zakra, A.N. (1997) Contribution à l’étude de la restauration et du maintien de la fertilité des sables quaternaires du littoral ivoirien: cas de l’utilisation d’arbres fixateurs biologiques d’azote comme plantes associatives avec les cocotiers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Abidjan Cocody, Abidjan, 152 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folefack, P.D. and Nsangou Njankouo, A. (2021) Local Food Trade in the Streets of Douala: The Case of Braised Ripe Plantain Sold by Women. International Journal of Biological and Chemical, 16, 753-771. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v16i2.20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Traoré</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kobenan</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kouassi</surname><given-names> K.S. and Gnonhouri G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Systèmes de culture du bananier plantain et méthodes de lutte contre les parasites et ravageurs en milieu paysan en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</article-title><source> Journal of Applied Biosciences</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 1094</fpage>-<lpage>1101</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lassois, L., Busogoro, J.P. and Jijakli, H., (2009) La banane: de son origine à sa commercialisation. Geography Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 13, 575-586.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atsin, O.G., N’Guetta, A., N’Da, V., Traoré, S., Aby, N. and Kobenan, K. (2019) Effet du compost à base de résidus de bananiers et cacao sur la croissance et le développement des vivo plants de trois variétés de bananier plantain. Revue Ivoirienne des Sciences et Technologie, 33, 276-286.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kwa, M. and Temple, L. (2019) Le bananier plantain: Enjeux socio-économiques et techniques. Qu&amp;#230;CTA Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, 199 p.https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2680-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiémélé, D. (2013) Systèmes de culture avec le plantain en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. CNRA, Abidjan, 8 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coffi, J.P.-M., Lékadou, T.T., Ama, J.T., Traoré, S., Yao, D.M.S., Agoh, F.C., Koffi, Z.E.B., Djaha, E.K. and Hala, F.N. (2021) état des lieux des bananeraies (Musa sp) en zone de culture du cocotier, sur le littoral en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire: Cas de la station Marc DELORME et des villages aux alentours. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 15, 2438-2455. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v15i6.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouamé, N., Dick, A.E., Assidjo, N.E. and Anno, A.P. (2014) étude de la croissance du bananier plantain (Musa sp., AAB cultivar Corne 1) dans les régions de Yamoussoukro et Azaguié (Cote d’Ivoire). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 76, 6411-6424. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v76i1.8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boa</surname><given-names> B.B. Ama</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Y.T.J.</surname><given-names> Lékadou</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> T.T.</surname><given-names> Kouassi</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Y.F. and N’Cho</surname><given-names> O.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2022</year>)<article-title>Performances Agromorphologiques de fumures organiques sur deux variétés de tomates sur sols sableux du littoral ivoirien</article-title><source> International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies</source><volume> 33</volume>,<fpage> 136</fpage>-<lpage>149</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouassi, Y.F., Gbogouri, G.A., N’guessan, K.A., Bilgo, A., Angui, K.T.P. and Ama, T.J. (2019) Effets de fertilisants organique et organominéral à base de déchets végétaux et animaux sur la croissance et le rendement du soja (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) en zone de savane de C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Agronomie Africaine, 31, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mukendi, R.T., Mutamba, B.T., Kabongo, D.M., Longanza, L.B. and Munyuli, T.M. (2017) Amélioration du sol dégradé par l’apport d’engrais inorganique, organiques et évaluation de rendement du ma&amp;#239;s (Zea mays L.) dans la province de Lomami, République Démocratique du Congo. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 11, 816-827. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i2.23</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koull, N. and Halilat, N.T. (2016) Effets de la matière organique sur les propriétés physiques et chimiques des sols sableux de la région d’Ouargla (Algérie). La Revue des Sciences de Gestion Direction et Gestion, 23, 9-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lékadou, T.T., Coffi, P.M.J., Yao, S.D.M. and Ama, T.J. (2019) Vegetative Growth Response of Eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum L.) to Combined Effects of Fertilizer Types and Irrigation Regimes Applied on Littoral Tertiary Soil in C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. International Journal of Plant &amp; Soil Science, 30, 2320-7035.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanoh, A.G. (2022) Apport des légumineuses (Acacia mangium, Arachis hypogaea) pour la restauration de la fertilité des sols sableux sous culture d’igname (Dioscorea cayenesis-rotundata) dans la région de Grand-Lahou (Sud-Ouest de la C&amp;#244;te D’Ivoire) Ph.D. Thesis, Université Felix Houhouet-Bouagny, Abidjan, 148p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoboué, A.N., N’goran, K.E., Ama, T.J., Kouassi, Y.F. and Yao, G.F. (2020) Effets du précédent cultural arachide (Arachis hypogaea L.) et de la charge en éléments grossiers du sol sur la production du coton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14, 2120-2133. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i6.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ama, T.J., Boa, B.B.Y., Yéboua, F.K., Lékadou, T.T. and Djaha, K.E. (2022) Caractéristiques physico-chimiques de compostes à base de résidus végétaux et de déjection animales et leurs effets sur des paramètres de croissance et de rendement de la tomate sur sols sableux. International Journals of Innovation and Scientific Research, 62, 61-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128637-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Géraldine, L.M. (2012) Study of the Impact of Potassium Fertilization on the Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Dessert Bananas during Growth and at Maturity. End of Studies Internship Thesis, University of Lorraine, Nancy, 31 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>