<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2023.1410057</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-128425</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessment of the Aflatoxin Content of Maize Flours Produced in the Commune of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Sawadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Raoul</surname><given-names>Bazié</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hama</surname><given-names>Cissé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Latifatou</surname><given-names>Helbi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cheikna</surname><given-names>Zongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aly</surname><given-names>Savadogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>University Center of Manga, Norbert ZONGO University, Manga, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry and Immunology, Research and Training Unit, Life and Earth, Sciences, Joseph KI-ZERBO Uni-versity, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>897</fpage><lpage>907</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Aflatoxins are toxic metabolites present in various foods, especially when production and conservation do not respect good hygiene practices (GHP). In Ouagadougou, maize flour is produced and sold in different structures by actors who do not always respect GHP. Thus, it is necessary to regularly control the quality of these flours. So, 
  this
   is carried out with the aim to assess the aflatoxin content of maize flours produced in the municipality of Ouagadougou. For this, twenty
  -
  eight (28) samples were collected from ho
  useholds, markets and supermarkets in the city of Ouagadougou. Thus, LC/MS/MS analysis was used to assess the aflatoxin content of the samples. The results obtained reveal the presence of total aflatoxins (AFT) in 78.57% of samples analyzed with levels ranging from 0.89 to 64.25 μg/kg. The prevalence of different types of aflatoxins were 57.14% for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), 46.43% for aflatoxin B2 (AFB2), 42.86% for aflatoxin G1 (AFG1) and 4.6% for aflatoxin G2 (AFG2). The results also show that 80% and 60% of market samples, 70% and 30% of household samples and 37.5% and 25% of supermarket samples do not comply with European Commission standards for AFT and AFB1 respectively. For all the samples, 60.71% and 42.86% of the samples are compliant according to the limits established by the European Commission (EC) respectively for AFB1 and AFT. Regarding the results obtained, producers and processors must be supervised and trained in GHP for the production of better-quality flours.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Aflatoxins</kwd><kwd> Maize Flour</kwd><kwd> Sanitaty Quality</kwd><kwd> LC/MS/MS</kwd><kwd> Ouagadougou</kwd><kwd> Burkina Faso</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In West Africa, maize is the main source of caloric intake in the national diet of almost all countries in the Zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref1">1</xref>] . In Burkina Faso, maize ranks second among cultivated cereals, in terms of area, production and consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref2">2</xref>] . The maize sector is growing, due to the increase in demand from the poultry sector, beverages and other processed products, with production of 1.133.480 and 1.710.898 tons respectively in 2011 and 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref3">3</xref>] . However, despite its socio-economic importance, maize faces a sometimes very delicate sanitary quality problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref4">4</xref>] . Like most cereals, maize is subject to contamination by aflatoxins which affect the health of the consumer. Food contamination by aflatoxins affects both natural and processed products such as cereals, oil seeds, dried fruits and products of animal origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref5">5</xref>] . Aflatoxins have a wide range of toxicological and other ill-effects on human life and are of greater public health concern in developing world where need for eating far outweighs other considerations like the safety issues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref6">6</xref>] . These aflatoxins represent a major concern for human and animal health since they can cause acute or chronic intoxications which are sometimes fatal due to their various toxic effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref7">7</xref>] . In children especially, aflatoxins lead to stunted growth and suppressed immunity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref8">8</xref>] . At economic level, annual crop losses due to aflatoxins alone reach 1.2 billion USD, African countries suffering 38% of these losses, or 450 million USD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref9">9</xref>] . In addition, there are also indirect losses, which are more difficult to assess and which are linked to the reduction in productivity of animals receiving feed containing aflatoxins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>In Africa, numerous studies have shown the contamination of maize by aflatoxins, sometimes with values exceeding the reference limits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref13">13</xref>] . In Burkina Faso, some studies on the evaluation of aflatoxin contents in infant flour have already been carried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref15">15</xref>] . Likewise, the evaluation of the aflatoxin content of koura-koura (a product resulting from the processing of peanut) was also carried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref16">16</xref>] . However, the contamination of maize flours of different origins with aflatoxins is not documented. In view of the above information’s and regarding the high consumption of maize by the population of Ouagadougou, continuous monitoring of the quality of maize flour is necessary to ensure the safety of this product. So, this study, aims to assess the aflatoxin content of maize flours produced in the municipality of Ouagadougou with the following specific objectives: assess the aflatoxin content of market flours, supermarket flours and household flours.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling</title><p>A total of 28 samples of maize flours were collected in the Ouagadougou city’s. The sampling sites were chosen to cover as many neighborhoods as possible in the commune of Ouagadougou. The collection was carried out in the markets, households and supermarkets. 500 g of each market and household’s samples were put in sterile plastic bags and then stored in the laboratory at room temperature. Supermarket samples already packaged in 1000 g bags were collected and then stored under the previous conditions in the laboratory. The sample collection sites and codes are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Aflatoxin Assay</title><p>Aflatoxin’s concentration was measured by LC/MS/MS (liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Extraction</title><p>Five (5) g of each flour were introduced into 50 mL falcon tube, then 10 mL of distilled water were added and the whole was briefly vortexed. The solution obtained was left to stand for a few minutes. Ten (10) mL of acetonitrile containing 2% acetic acid were added to the previous mixture, and the whole was vortexed for 5 minutes. Then, 4 g of magnesium sulphate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) and 1g of sodium chloride (NaCl) were added and the mixture was vortexed for one minute. The mixture previously obtained was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4000 rpm.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Purification</title><p>After centrifugation, 6 mL of the supernatant was taken for each sample, then introduced into falcon tubes containing each, 1200 mg of magnesium sulphate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>) and 400 mg of PSA (Primary and Secondary Amine, used to improve</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sampling sites and codes of maize flour samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of sampling</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Localization site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples code</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Market</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pissyyaar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW1 and MsY1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zone 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 yaar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW4 and MsY4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dassasgho</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsY5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zagtouli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW2 and MsY2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silmissin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW3 and MsY3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zone 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW1 and HsY1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saaba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW2 and HsY2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secteur 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW3 and HsY3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanghin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW4 and HsY4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pissy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW5 and HsY5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Supermarket</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Benogo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsY1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zone 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW2 and SsY2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wayalghin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW3 and SsY3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pissy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW4 and SsW5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zagtouli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>S: sample; M: market; H: Household; S: Supermarket; W: White; Y: Yellow.</p><p>purification by removing sugars, fatty acids and organic acids). The mixture obtained was stirred for 1 min and then centrifuged for 5 min at 4000 rpm. Then, the supernatant was extracted using a hydrophobic filter and a syringe. The solutions obtained were introduced into vials.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Aflatoxin Detection and Quantification</title><p>HPLC/MS/MS method described by Oplatowska-Stachowiak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref17">17</xref>] was used to determine and quantify aflatoxins in homogenized maize flours samples. Standards obtained in powder form were prepared at the concentration 1 mg/mL in the appropriate amount of solvent (MeCN or MeOH) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Different solutions of standards were prepared as calibrants for the instrument to determine the limit of detection of each aflatoxin. The concentrated standard sets were also used for preparing calibrants in matrix. The aflatoxin quantitation was achieved by preparing matrix-matched calibration curves with blank maize flour. The purified products were separated using a C18 column. The mass spectrometry was conducted by using positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) models. Data acquisition and quantification were performed using Mass Hunter Workstation B.04.01 software (Agilent Technologies).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analyzes</title><p>The data collected during this study was subjected to an analysis of variance using XLSTAT-Pro 7.5 version 2019 software. The means of the variables were compared using the Newman Keuls test at the probability level p = 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Aflatoxin Content of Flours</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Market Flours</title><p>The results obtained for the samples taken from the markets are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The results obtained show that aflatoxins B1, B2 and G1 are present in most of the samples of white maize flours with average levels of 7.27 &#181;g/kg, 5.59 &#181;g/kg and 22.62 &#181;g/kg respectively. For yellow maize flour, the levels were 6.14 &#181;g/kg, 12.13 &#181;g/kg and 10.36 &#181;g/kg respectively for AFB1, AFB2 and AFG1. Total aflatoxin levels in white maize flours were higher than those in yellow maize flours with average levels of 26.61 &#181;g/kg and 18.20 &#181;g/kg respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Household Flours</title><p>The results obtained for the samples taken from households are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. They show that in general, aflatoxins are more present in yellow maize than in white maize. Similarly, the total aflatoxin contents of yellow maize are higher than those of white maize with respective average contents of 29.34 &#181;g/kg and 17.04 &#181;g/kg respectively. For yellow maize flour, the average levels were 6.46 &#181;g/kg, 7.29 &#181;g/kg and 24.73 &#181;g/kg respectively for AFB1, AFB2 and AFG1. For this type of flour, aflatoxin G2 was only recorded in one sample of white maize</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Aflatoxins levels in markets flours</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Types of maize flours</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Level of aflatoxins (&#181;g/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsW5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsY1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsY2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsY3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsY4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MsY5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.22</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Lod: Limit of detection.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Aflatoxins levels in household flours</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Types of maize flours</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Level of aflatoxins (&#181;g/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsW5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsY1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsY2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsY3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsY4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HsY5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.43</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Lod: Limit of detection.</p><p>flour with a content of 35.68 &#181;g/kg.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Supermarket Flours</title><p>The results obtained for the samples taken in Supermarket are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. These results show that aflatoxins are less present in the supermarket samples than in other two cases. Only one yellow maize flour sample contains AFB2 with a level of 4.08 μg/kg. For white maize flours, the average levels were 11.68 μg/kg, 7.02 μg/kg, 32.22 μg/kg and 26.45 μg/kg respectively for AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFT.</p><p>For all 28 samples, the aflatoxin levels are highly variable. They ranged from</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Aflatoxins levels in supermarket flours</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Types of maize flours</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Level of aflatoxins (&#181;g/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsW5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsY1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsY2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SsY3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Lod: Limit of detection.</p><p>undetected to 36.69 &#181;g/kg and from undetected to 64.25 &#181;g/kg respectively for AFB1 and AFT. These aflatoxins levels are similar to that of Bamba et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref4">4</xref>] with average AFB1 contents of 0.79 &#177; 0.04 &#181;g/kg to 20.92 &#177; 4.63 &#181;g/kg in maize samples from 5 regions of C&#244;te d’Ivoire. The AFB1 contents obtained during this study are higher than those revealed during a study carried out in C&#244;te d’Ivoire on samples of maize flour with levels ranging from 0.12 &#181;g/kg to 3.18 &#181;g/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref9">9</xref>] . They are also superior to that of Maskito et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref6">6</xref>] who obtained a maximum AFB1 level of 15.62 &#181;g/kg in maize flours in Kenya.</p><p>Contrariwise, higher average levels of AFB1 (108 &#181;g/kg) with ranges of 5.7 to 309 &#181;g/kg were found in maize flour samples from markets in Abidjan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref18">18</xref>] . Similarly, AFB1 levels up to 1081 &#181;g/kg were reported in maize samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>For AFT, the levels recorded during this this study were similar to those of Bamba et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref4">4</xref>] recorder in samples, ranging from 2.63 &#177; 2.35 &#181;g/kg to 60.78 &#177; 30.24 &#181;g/kg from five regions in C&#244;te d’Ivoire. In contrast, high level of AFT were revealed by Kouadio et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref18">18</xref>] which obtained a mean of 129 &#181;g/kg with ranges of 4.5 to 330 in samples from C&#244;te d’Ivoire. However, Manizan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref7">7</xref>] detected AFB2, and AFG1 at lower levels in maize flour samples (8 &#181;g/kg for both AFB2 and AFG1) compared to the rates recorded during this study. The same authors detected 6 &#181;g/kg for AFG2 in the same samples.</p><p>This study shows that in general, aflatoxin levels are lower in samples from supermarkets than in samples from markets and households. However, the statistical analysis shows that there is no significant difference between the AFB1 and AFT contents of flours from the three origins (p = 0.726 and p = 0.966 respectively). The low level of aflatoxins in supermarket samples can be explained by the fact that supermarkets source their supplies from particular producers who better respect GHP and GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices).</p><p>For the household samples, the aflatoxin level of yellow maize flours is higher than those of white maize flours. however, the analysis of variance shows that there is no significant difference between the aflatoxin contents of the two types of maize flours in the case of household samples (p = 0.168). According to some producers, yellow maize flour is often produced without ridding the grain of the bran. This could explain the higher levels of aflatoxins in this type of flour. Moreover, according to Diarra et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref20">20</xref>] , yellow maize is most often intended for animal nutrition, so, its conservation is not always done according to the same requirements as that of white maize. This could also justify the high levels of aflatoxins in yellow maize flours.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Prevalence of Aflatoxins in Flours</title><p>This study shows that the different types of aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, G2 and AFT) are present in most samples. Total aflatoxins show the highest prevalence. Aflatoxins B are generally more common than aflatoxins G. The study also shows that supermarket samples have relatively lower contamination rates than household samples. Market samples show the highest contamination rates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Overall, for all the samples, the prevalence is 57.14% (16/28) for aflatoxin B1, 46.43% (13/28) for aflatoxin B2, 42.86% (12/28) for aflatoxin G1, 4.6% (1/28) for aflatoxin G1 and 78.57% (22/28) for total aflatoxins. Some studies show lowest prevalence compared to those recorded during this study. So, in study performed in Kenya on maize floor, it is noticed that the percentage of positive samples for aflatoxin B2, G1 and G2 were 7%, 33% and 13%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref6">6</xref>] . According to the same study, the highest contamination was with aflatoxin B1 contaminating 40% of the samples analyzed. In contrast, high contaminations of aflatoxins were recorded in other studies. So, in recent study, AFB1 was recovered in 96%, AFB2 in 67%, AFG1 in 57% and AFG2 in 24% of maize samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>For total aflatoxins, the low prevalence rate compared to those of this study was recorded in some studies on maize flours. Thus, 16.6% of contaminated samples was recorder in South Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref22">22</xref>] . Similarly, 41.6% of contaminated samples was recorder in Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Conformity of Samples</title><p>The levels of total aflatoxins and Aflatoxin B1 in foods are regulated. According to EC (European Community) Regulation No 1881/2006, the study shows that the compliance rates of the samples vary according to the origin and type of maize (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). It also shows that non-compliance rates are generally lower in supermarket samples and higher in market samples.</p><p>In general, 78.57% of the samples showed contamination for at least one of the types of studied aflatoxin. For all the samples, 42.86% showed compliant AFT levels according to to EC Regulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref24">24</xref>] (less than 4 &#181;g/kg). For AFB1, about 60.71% of the samples showed levels below 2 μg/kg. These samples are therefore of satisfactory quality, according to EC Regulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref24">24</xref>] . The results obtained by other authors confirm that the compliance rates of maize flour with respect to</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Contamination rate of samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Number of contaminated samples and prevalence (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Market sample</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household sample</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Supermarket sample</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07/10 (70%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05/10 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04/08 (50%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05/10 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04/10 (40%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04/08 (50%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05/10 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05/10 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02/08 (25%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00/10 (00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01/10 (10%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00/08 (00%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08/10 (80%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08/10 (80%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/08 (75%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Samples compliance rate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Types of samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >(%) of compliant samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >White maize flours</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yellow maize flours</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFB1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Market</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Supermarket</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>AFB1 and AFT vary greatly from one study to another. So, According to Matsiko et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref6">6</xref>] , for aflatoxin B1, 13% of samples contained the levels of the aflatoxin, which were higher than Codex Alimentarius tolerable limit. Similarly, contamination levels higher than the EC limit for AFB1 were found in 61% of the contaminated maize samples, and for AFT in 53% of the same samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref7">7</xref>] . According to DE MARINIS et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.128425-ref25">25</xref>] , contamination rates higher than the limit ranging from 25% to 100% were measured for AFT in divers’ varieties of maize from Haiti.</p><p>This study shows that maize flours can constitute a danger for consumers with regard to the levels of contamination and consumption of this food product. Thus, it is essential to train those involved in maize production on good practices related to production, processing and conservation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the toxicological quality relating to the aflatoxin content of maize flour produced and sold in municipality of Ouagadougou. The analysis of the twenty-eight samples of maize flours revealed that the majority of these flours were contaminated with the different types of aflatoxins. The proportions of contaminated samples are variable, relatively high for AFB1 and low for AFG2. The aflatoxin contents of the samples are also very heterogeneous. Similarly, most of the samples show non-compliant AFB1 and AFT levels according to EC regulation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank the National Agency for Food, Environment, Food Safety and Labor (ANSSEAT) for the technical platform used for the mycotoxin assay.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this article.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sawadogo, A., Bazi&#233;, R., Ciss&#233;, H., Helbi, L., Zongo, C. and Savadogo, A. (2023) Assessment of the Aflatoxin Content of Maize Flours Produced in the Commune of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14, 897-907. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2023.1410057</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.128425-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAOSTAT (2015) Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nation. FAOSTAT Database.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Direction Générale des Etudes et des Statistiques Sectorielles (DGESS) (2015) Résultatsdéfinitifs de la campagneagricole et de la situation alimentaire et nutritionnelle. Ministère de l’agriculture et de la Sécurité Alimentaire, Burkina Faso, 77 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministère de l’Agriculture et des Aménagements Hydro-agricole (MAAH) (2020) Filièremais au Burkina: Uneinterprofession pour mieuxrelever les défis. Publié le 07/9/2020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bamba, S., Coulibaly, A., Sidibe, D., Nyamien, B.Y. and Biego, G.H.M. (2021) Assessment of the Risk of Exposure to Aflatoxins Found in Maize (Zea mays L.) Produced in Cote d’Ivoire in Ivorian Adults. Asian Food Science Journal, 20, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.9734/afsj/2021/v20i730323</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houmairi, H. and Hicham, M. (2015) Composition enmycobiota et mycotoxines de type aflatoxines et ochratoxine A de quelquesépices dans la région centrale du Maroc. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 6, 877-884.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsiko, F., Kanyange, C., Ingabire, G., Dusingizimana, T., Vasanthakaalam, H. and Kimonyo, A. (2017) Detection and Quantification of Aflatoxin in Cassava and Maize Flour Sold in Kigali Open Markets, Rwanda. International Food Research Journal, 24, 459-464. http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manizan, A.L., Oplatowska-Stachowiak, M., Piro-Metayer, I., Campbell, K., Koffi-Nevry, R., Elliott, C., Akaki, D., Montet, D. and Brabet, C. (2018) Multi-Mycotoxin Determination in Rice, Maize and Peanut Products Most Consumed in Cote d’Ivoire by UHPLC-MS/MS. Food Control, 87, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.11.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alshannaq, A.F., Gibbons, J.G., Lee, M.K., Han, K.H., Hong, S.B. and Yu, J.H. (2018) Controlling Aflatoxin Contamination and Propagation of Aspergillus flavus by a Soy-Fermenting Aspergillus oryzae Strain. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 16871. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35246-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marechera</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Estimation of the Potential Adoption of Aflasafe among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Lower Eastern Kenya</article-title><source> African Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 72</fpage>-<lpage>85</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CAST (2003) Council for Agricultural Science and Technology—Task Force Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezoua, P., Konan, C., Coulibaly, A., Sidibe, D., Niamketchi, L., Konan, Y., Amane, D., Chatigre, O.K. and Biego, H.M. (2017) Daily Intake of Aflatoxin b1 and Ochratoxin a from Maize Grain (Zea mays L.) during the Storage with Lippia multiflora (Verbenaceae) and Hyptissuaveolens (Lamiaceae) Leaves in Cote d’Ivoire. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, 3, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAAR/2017/37719</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fofana-Diomandé, A., Konan, J.M.K., Aka-Diemeleou, C., Traoré, K.S. and Dembélé, A. (2019) Exposition alimentaire au mycotoxine cancérogènes dans le département de Séguéla (Nord-ouest de la Cote d’Ivoire): Cas de l’aflatoxine B1. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 13, 937-949. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v13i2.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, V.G., Biego, H.M., Konan, K.C., Niamketchi, L. and Coulibaly, A. (2020) Evolution of Mycotoxins during Maize Grains Storage in Triple Bags Containing Plants Biopesticides (Lippia multiflora and Hyptis suaveolens). Asian Food Sciences Journal, 17, 22-33. https://doi.org/10.9734/afsj/2020/v17i330193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanou, A., Tapsoba, F., Zongo, C., Savadogo, A. and Traore, Y. (2017) Etude de la qualiténutritionnelle et microbiologique des farinesinfantiles de quatre unités de production: CMA saint Camille de Nanoro, CSPS Saint Louis de Temnaoré, CM saint Camille de Ouagadougou et CHR de Koudougou. Nature &amp; Technology Journal B: Agronomic &amp; Biological Sciences, 17, 25-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waré, L.Y., Durand, N., Nikiema, P.A., Alter, P., Fontana, A., Montet, D. and Barro, N. (2017) Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Commercial Infant Formulas Locally Produced in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Food Control, 73, 518-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sawadogo, Y.A., Cisse, H., Zongo, O., Nikiema, F., Traore, Y. and Savadogo, A. (2021) Reduction of Aflatoxins and Microorganisms in the Koura-Koura Produced in Burkina Faso with Spices and Aromatic Leaves. Journal of Food Technology Research, 8, 19-17. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.58.2021.81.9.17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oplatowska-Stachowiak, M., Haughey, S.A., Chevallier, O.P., Galvin-King, P., Campbell, K., Magowan, E. and Elliott, C.T. (2015) Determination of the Mycotoxin Content in Distiller’s Dried Grain with Solubles Using a Multianalyte UHPLC-MS/MS Method. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63, 9441-9451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03844</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouadio, J.H., Lattanzio, V.M.T., Ouattara, D., Kouakou, B. and Visconti, A. (2014) Assessment of Mycotoxin Exposure in Cote D’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) through Multi-Biomarker Analysis and Possible Correlation with Food Consumption Patterns. Toxicology International, 21, 248-257. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6580.155336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamala, A., Ortiz, J., Kimanya, M., Haesaert, G., Donoso, S., Tiisekwa, B. and De Meulenaer, B. (2015) Multiple Mycotoxin Co-Occurrence in Maize Grown in Three Agro-Ecological Zones of Tanzania. Food Control, 54, 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diarra, B., Hien, O.C. and Coulibaly, Y. (2017) Effetsd’une ration à base de la variété de mais sur la productivité des poulettes. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 11, 806-816. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i2.22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouadio, J.H. (2022) Risk Assessment of Mycotoxins Intake through the Consumption of Maize, Peanuts, Rice and Cassava in Cote d’Ivoire. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 13, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2022.131005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mngqawa, P., Shephard, G.S., Green, I.R., Ngobeni, S.H., Rijk, T.C.D. and Katerere, D.R. (2016) Mycotoxin Contamination of Home-Grown Maize in Rural Northern South Africa (Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces). Food Additives and Contaminants, 9, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2015.1121928</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okeke, C.A., Ezekiel, C.N., Nwangburuka, C.C., Sulyok, M., Ezeamagu, C.O., Adeleke, R.A., Dike, S.K. and Krska, R. (2015) Bacterial Diversity and Mycotoxin Reduction during Maize Fermentation (Steeping) for OGI Production. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article No. 1402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01402</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">European Commission (2006) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs (Text with EEA Relevance). Official Journal of European Union, No. 364, 5-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128425-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Marinis, P., Spada, A. and Aristil, J. (2019) Evaluation des paramètresproductifs et quantification d’aflatoxine de sept variétés de mais (Zea mays L.) testéesen Haiti. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 13, 3009-3022. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v13i7.3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>