<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2023.1110009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-128405</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Rapid Urbanization and Environment Management in Nkafu Municipality, Eastern DR Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alain</surname><given-names>Tshimbalanga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patient</surname><given-names>M. Zamukulu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liévin</surname><given-names>Chirhalwirwa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Katcho</surname><given-names>Karume</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Centre de Recherche en Géothermie, Bukavu, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Institut Supérieur d’Etudes Agronomiques et Vétérinaires (ISEAV), Walungu, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institut Supérieur d’Architecture et Urbanisme (ISAU), Kinshasa, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Université Evangélique en Afrique (UEA), Bukavu, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>106</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Rapid and uncontrolled urbanization as well as urban land management are major constraints to land planning in the Democratic Republic of Congo. A 
  household data collection and analysis was carried out in 283 random households in the Nkafu municipality, eastern DR Congo, to assess the local community’s perception of rapid urbanization and its impact on land policy and management of the built landscape. Data of socio-demographics characteristics, rapid urbanization, and environment management data were collected and analyzed using XLStat version 2019. In addition, the study area location map, land use and cover change maps were generated using ArcMap 10.8. Results indicate that landowners are dominant and, build simple houses with unsustainable building materials (i.e. wooden plank) obtained locally. In addition, land management is not appreciated by local communities, due to
   
  anarchic construction due to lack of financial resources generating thus an increasing amount of urban waste, which is poorly managed. 
  The study suggests, urban roads renew, building in conformity with urban planning and building regulations, potable water supply and health services availability to improve the study area. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) use, would provide spatial information on land planning in the study area.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Urbanization</kwd><kwd> Environmental Management</kwd><kwd> Land Planning</kwd><kwd> Land Reorganization</kwd><kwd> Nkafu</kwd><kwd> Bukavu</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Urbanization is a socio-economic process that plays a key role in environmental development. This process is based on the urban growth of residential areas, which has an impact on global land policy (  Doygun, 2020 ;  Kabiso et al., 2022 ). According to  Benti et al. (2022) ,  Cruz-Bello et al. (2023) , ~10% of the global population was living in urban areas in the 1900s, but rapid urban growth, estimated ~50%, has been reported since the early 2000s, causing major land changes in the management of the city’s environment with the land conversion of housing areas.</p><p>In fact, local perception of the spatio-temporal urban environment is one of the land policies playing a key role in urban development, especially in developing countries characterized by rapid population growth (  Collier et al., 2015 ;  Koranteng et al., 2023 ). In addition, uncontrolled urban growth is one of the major land planning constraints in most of Africa’s major cities, such as Bukavu in eastern DR Congo, where rural migration is accelerating poor land policy associated with high occurrence of environmental hazards (  Ntamusimwa et al., 2022 ).</p><p>Urbanization and peri-urbanization, linked directly to the urban environment, influence land conversion in built-up areas where rural and urban activities are combined, and where the urbanization of slums modifies land tenure status of residential areas in areas of high population growth (  Cruz-Bello et al., 2023 ). According to  Hoffmann et al. (2019) , poverty and poor land tenure security accelerate these phenomena and make urban planning more difficult.</p><p>In Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo), rapid and uncontrolled urbanization in the surrounding cities is one of the results of armed conflict, especially in the eastern part of the country, where population migration has generated slums in major cities such as Bukavu (  Lupiki et al., 2020 ). Furthermore, uncontrolled building in slums has serious social, economic and political impact on communities, where land conflicts and waste management are the main challenges on urban land management (  Hoffmann et al., 2019 ). However, local knowledge of the perceived consequences of rapid urbanization on land and environmental management contributes significantly to the decision-making process during land-use planning for urban expansion (  Mevoa et al., 2015 ;  Tohozin &amp; Guedegbe, 2015 ;  Edongo &amp; Tchuikoua, 2021 ;  Udessa et al., 2023 ). This study was therefore, assesses local community perceptions of rapid urbanization, and identifies consequences of this urbanization on land management and urban environment management.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>This study was carried out in Nkafu district, located in Kadutu municipality (in the city of Bukavu, South Kivu, eastern DR Congo). Bukavu has a very hilly terrain with slopes around 75%. In fact, the lowest point is at 1417 m above sea level, and the highest is at 2172 m with a difference of 755 m above sea level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Bukavu covers ~63 km<sup>2</sup>, with the majority (43 km<sup>2</sup>) covered by upland and 20 km<sup>2</sup> by Lake Kivu water (  Bilubi, 2014 ;  Chako et al., 2022 ). According to  Ntamusimwa et al. (2022) , Bukavu covers 43 km<sup>2</sup> and is divided into 3 districts: Kadutu (6.68 km<sup>2</sup>), Ibanda (13.38 km<sup>2</sup>) and Bagira (23.26 km<sup>2</sup>), with Kadutu being the main commercial center and Ibanda the administrative district of South Kivu province.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Climate and Land Cover</title><p>Bukavu has a humid tropical climate, with temperature variations influenced by its elevation and sub-equatorial position. Vegetation in Bukavu is dominated by tree species (e.g. eucalyptus, cypress, etc.), agroforestry and fruit tree species (e.g. mango, guava, lemon, orange, avocado, etc.) and a number of wild grass species (e.g. Tithonia diversifolia, Lantana camara, Galinsango parviflora, and Commelina diffusa, etc.).</p><p>Bukavu’s soil is generally basaltic. It’s not completely clayey, as it’s much more compact. However, it is also less permeable and highly susceptible to drought. Bukavu’s hilly terrain and climate combine to create one of the most sensitive cities to environmental hazards such as soil erosion (  Eisenberg &amp; Muvundja, 2020 ;  Chako et al., 2022 ), and landslides (  Bigirimwami, 2009 ;  Maki Mateso &amp; Dewitte, 2014 ;  Balegamire et al., 2017 ;  Kulimushi et al., 2017 ;  Mugaruka et al., 2017 ;</p><p> Ntamusimwa et al., 2022 ) which are increasingly occurring in this town faced with rapid population growth.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the spatio-temporal change in land use in the Bukavu town from 2000 to 2021. In fact, urbanization is changing over time in many parts of the town, which is characterized by hilly terrain. The land use change from 2000 to 2021 is presented in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis</title><p>Data collection based on a household survey using a questionnaire combined with an interview with the local authorities of Kadutu municipality. Household</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Land use and cover change o of Bukavu from 2000 to 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Classes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.14 km<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.87 km<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Savannah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57 km<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.94 km<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Human occupations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64 km<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.541 km<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall accuracy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2921/3206) 91.11%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(3251/3411) 95.30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kappa coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.56%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.42%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>characteristics (socio-demographic and economic) were collected from members aged over 18. In addition, information on land tenure security and conformity with urban planning regulations were collected from household heads in the Nkafu district. To achieve this, 283 respondents were selected. Survey data were input using Microsoft Excel, and descriptive analyses were performed using the Statistical Software XLStat version 2019 package.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Households in the Study Area</title><p>Household characteristics in the study area are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> show that most household heads in the study area were men (96.2%) aged over 60, while those aged from 30 to 40 represented the lowest category. Most respondents were married (91.5%), while others were single (2.7%) or in other marital status (5.8%). The majority had no formal education (54.6%), while those with secondary, post-secondary and primary education represented 3.8%, 3.8%, 8.5%, and 29.4% respectively. Most (65.5%) respondents had lived in the study area between 6 and 10 years, and had trade as their main household income source.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Land and Building Administration in the Study Area</title><p>Results of Land and building administration in the study area are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that most respondents (73.7%) were landowners who lived in simple houses (60.8%) built with unsustainable bulding materials or wood (55.6%) with 3 to 5 rooms (72.4%). Most landowners in the study area obtained their plots by buying them (53.2%), but were separated from the road by more than 5 plots (63.8%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Land Policy and Urban Environment Management in the Study Area</title><p>Results of Land policy and urban environment management are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that most (65%) respondents did not appreciate the current land administration by the authorities and/or neighbors, and in the case of land conflicts, more than half (86.3%) reached negotiated agreement. In fact, the majority (72%) of respondents had indicated that access to housing plots was one of the reasons for a good urban planning policy, while 32% of respondents had indicated that access to housing plots and uncontrolled construction (29.4%) were the main reasons for a poor land administration policy for building. Soil erosion (4.8%), insalubrity (5.8%), landslides (8.5%), fire frequency (9.6%) and land conflicts (9.9%) were considered to be consequences of the poor urbanization policy. To adapt to the conditions of urbanization, 48.5% and 30.4% of respondents respectively suggested the delineation of plot boundaries and respect for building standards to be the main corrective strategies.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Urban Environment and Householder Waste Management</title><p>Results of urban environment and householder waste management are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of households</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Gender (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Man</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 40 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 - 60 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;60 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Marital Statut (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Education level (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primairy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illiterate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Stay (Residence) duration (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 15 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 5 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Income source (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agriculture/Livestock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trade</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teaching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Public servant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Land and building administration in the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Land tenure system (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Landowner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Type of house (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Split-level house</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single-family house (Detached)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Type of bulding materials (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sustainable bulding materials</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unsustainable bulding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Number of rooms in the house (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;3 rooms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5 rooms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;5 rooms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Land acquisition mode (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Buy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Legacy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Number of plots near road (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 plot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 3 plots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5 plots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;5 plots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Land policy and urban environment management</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Land administration appreciation (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Land conflict management (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Friendly arrangements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local authority</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Drivers of good planning policy (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good access to plots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Good land administration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reduction of uncontrolled construction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Respect of environmental regulations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Consequencess of poor urbanization policy (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soil erosion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insalubrity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Landslide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Land conflicts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >anarchy (poor land planning)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Difficult acces to plots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Corrective strategies (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strengthening land governance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bollard installation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interdiction of small plot buying</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >building standards respect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protecting the land</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap-group id="5"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Urban environment and householder waste management</title></caption><table-wrap id="5_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Existence of a household waste management policy (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Household waste management system (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incineration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household garbage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Public garbage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Respect of environmental norms (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Constraints to construction (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited access to materials</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited proximity to roads</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water resources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hilly terrain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="5_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Recommandation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drinking water supply</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bollard installation system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strengthening sanitation services</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Creation of green spaces</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maintenance of urban roads</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that most respondents (59.4%) indicated that there is a good waste management policy in the area, to protect the urban environment. More than half of respondents (53.9%) use household waste collection systems, while only 1% incinerates their waste. In fact, the majority (79.5%) indicated that environmental regulations are not respected in the study area, and for 48.5% of households, this is mainly due to a lack of financial resources. Road rehabilitation (50.2%) and public waste management (30.7%) are the main recommendations for good urban environmental governance.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Rapid Urbanization and Its Impact on Land Policy</title><p>The results show that respondents do not appreciate the land policy of the area where they are located, and this is due to the many consequences that local people experience on a day-to-day level. According to  Town et al. (2018) , Rapid, uncontrolled urbanization has major impacts on the urban environment, particularly in the case of uncontrolled construction, which is one of the main characteristics of shanty towns around major cities. Uncontrolled urban growth is also characterized by environmental pollution and poor access to basic services and infrastructures. In addition, findings of  Doygun (2020)  show that local perceptions of urbanization are based on poor land management associated with poor environmental management caused by poor sanitation services, which have an impact on public health in low-income areas such as our study area.</p><p> Ntamusimwa et al. (2022)  indicated that rapid, uncontrolled urbanization in Bukavu’s districts is one of the consequences of the city’s limited expansion, which is also having a negative impact on restructuring by increasing its susceptibility to natural and anthropogenic hazards such as landslides (  Bigirimwami, 2009 ;  Bunduki et al., 2015 ;  UEA-PNUD, 2018 ), soil erosion (  UEA-PNUD, 2018 ;  Chako et al., 2022 ), flooding (  Mawemba, 2016 ;  UEA-PNUD, 2018 ), wildfire (  Banza et al., 2022 ). Natural and anthropogenic hazards occurring at the same time in the study area are directly linked to the poor land policy in the study area, where the hilly terrain has a negative impact on land planning. Results of  Yi et al. (2016)  show that urbanization in highland regions requires hillside protection measures, which in the context of poor land-use planning can lead to landslides and material and human damage.</p><p>Urban waste management is one of respondents’ recommendations for good urban environmental management. Results of  Kassoum (2013)  show, for example, that uncontrolled construction in developing countries is at the origin of inadequate urban waste management. However, local community knowledge of waste management is one of the main strategies for participative management of the urban environment. According to  Benti et al. (2022) , all these consequences are mainly due to poor land resource governance for successful and effective land planning. Rapid urbanization and land policy in general have been the driving factors of major environmental and social changes in land policies worldwide (  Richards et al., 2020 ). However, a number of previous studies indicate that integrated land-use planning with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is one of the major tools of effective land-use policy, with highly promising results in reducing the social and environmental consequences of land-use planning in many parts of the world (  Farhan &amp; Al-shawamreh, 2019 ).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Environmental Management and Its Consequences</title><p>Poor sewage systems are one of the main consequences of the inappropriate land-use policy in the study area, which is characterized by the rapid growth of built-up areas. Results of  Mulalisi (2016)  in the Panzi district of Bukavu (DR Congo) show that rapid, uncontrolled urbanization is one of the main causes of the poor urban and environmental policies affecting land use and waste management. In Nkafu, for example, rapid, and uncontrolled urbanization is also associated with socio-economic factors, characterized by small businesses that are the livelihoods of most of the area’s population.</p><p>Local perception and knowledge of urbanization vary from one respondent to another, but the impact of peri-urbanization and rapid urbanization is poorly known in most municipalities where land-use planning policies are not respected (  Hatab et al., 2022 ). Natural hazards, land conflicts, land access difficulty, etc. are the main consequences perceived by the people in the study area. Results of  Jurkovič (2014)  agree with our findings, revealing that the public planning of land areas causes serious problems for environmental management, by limiting comfort in the residential areas of rapid urbanized cities. According to  Peltonen &amp; Sairinen (2010)  and  Magsi et al. (2017) , increasing conflict in developing countries is caused by the lack of social justice and can be seen as a result of factors associated with the availability of resources (e.g. farmland, houses and other physical resources), especially in peri-urban areas.</p><p>Our results show that local communities are not involved in land planning as part of the effective management of the urban environment. This can be attributed to the government’s policy of public land administration. On the other hand, the results of (  van Empel, 2008 ) demonstrate that the effective participation of local communities in land administration is one of the most effective strategies contributing significantly to participatory land planning and development. Furthermore, the results of  Butta (2020)  show that social inequalities have an impact on the urbanization rate (popular and physical) in most poor-country cities, where the land administration sector’s resources are insufficient to develop the land tenure system.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The aim of the study was to assess local communities’ knowledge of rapid urbanization, land policy and management of the urban environment in the Nkafu municipality of Bukavu. Results show that limited financial resources and low participation of local authorities in land governance are the main causes of rapid urbanization, with major consequences such as uncontrolled construction, urban governance, land conflicts and exposure to natural and anthropogenic hazards (e.g. landslides, erosion, fire, etc.). Integrating these results by all stakeholders, together with a Geographic Information System (GIS) based on urban planning techniques would help resolve the land-use planning problems and limit the exposure of buildings to natural hazards in built-up areas in the hilly study area. The spatio-temporal continuation of this research will provide important information on the environmental management of DRC’s cities.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tshimbalanga, A., Zamukulu, P. M., Chirhalwirwa, L., &amp; Karume, K. (2023). Rapid Urbanization and Environment Management in Nkafu Municipality, Eastern DR Congo. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 11, 106-118. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.1110009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.128405-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Balegamire</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Michellier</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Muhigwa</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Delvaux</surname><given-names> D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Imani</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Dewitte</surname><given-names> O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>. Vulnérabilité du bati face aux glissements de terrain: Analyse spatio-temporelle à Bukavu (RD Congo)</article-title><source> Geo-Eco-Trop</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 263</fpage>-<lpage>277</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banza, E., Momeka, L., Kazamwali, M., Malinga, C., &amp; Bahaya, N. (2022). La problématique des incendies à Bukavu et mesures de prévention. Cahiers du CERUKI, Nouvelle Série, 63, 56-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benti, S., Terefe, H., &amp; Callo-Concha, D. (2022). Implications of Overlooked Drivers in Ethiopia’s Urbanization: Curbing the Curse of Spontaneous Urban Development for Future Emerging Towns. Heliyon, 8, e10997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bigirimwami, L. (2009). Contribution du SIG à l’étude des différents facteurs environnementaux à la base de glissements des terrains dans la commune de Kadutu, ville de Bukavu (RD Congo). Mémoire de Ma&amp;#238;trise, 49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bilubi, M. (2014). L’insalubrite publique et la santé environnementale dans le district sanitaire de Bukavu. Université Evangélique en Afrique.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bunduki</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mushayuma</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Tambala</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Materanya</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Matembera</surname><given-names> B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>. Cartographie des sites sinistrés par les glissements de terrain du 17 au 26/01/2014 dans le bassin du Lac Kivu à Bukavu, Sud-Kivu, RD Congo</article-title><source> International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 118</fpage>-<lpage>126</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Butta, G. (2020). The Challenges of Urbanization on Land Development and Management Systems: The Case Sabbata Town Addis Ababa-Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Addis Ababa University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chako, I., Rubabura, J., Banda, T., Rugomba, P., Mituga, V., Myango, L.-P. et al. (2022). Mapping of Soil Erosion Risk in Bukavu (Democratic Republic of Congo): Using RUSLE, Remote Sensing and GIS. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e9216. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collier, C., de Almeida Neto, M., Aretakis, G., Santos, R., de Oliveira, T., Mour&amp;#227;o, J., et al. (2015). Integrated Approach to the Understanding of the Degradation of an Urban River: Local Perceptions, Environmental Parameters and Geoprocessing. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11, Article No. 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0054-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cruz-Bello, G., Galeana-Piza&amp;#241;a, J., &amp; González-Arellano, S. (2023). Urban Growth in Peri-Urban, Rural and Urban Areas: Mexico City. Buildings and Cities, 4, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.230</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doygun, N. (2020). Assessment of Public Perception on Urban Environmental Problems by Using Q Methodology. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 21, 481-488. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.799763</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edongo</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Tchuikoua</surname><given-names> L.-B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2021</year>)<article-title>. Incivisme des populations, laxisme des pouvoirs publics et désordre urbain dans la ville de Yagoua (Extrême Nord Cameroun)</article-title><source> Canadian Journal of Tropical Geography</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 38</fpage>-<lpage>42</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eisenberg, J., &amp; Muvundja, F. (2020). Quantification of Erosion in Selected Catchment Areas of the Ruzizi River (DRC) Using the (R)USLE Model. Land, 9, Article 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9040125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farhan, Y., &amp; Al-shawamreh, S. (2019). Impact of Rapid Urbanization and Changing Housing Patterns on Urban Open Public Spaces of Amman, Jordan: A GIS and RS Perspective. Journal of Environmental Protection, 10, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2019.101005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatab, A., Ravula, P., Nedumaran, S., &amp; Lagerkvist, C.-J. (2022). Perceptions of the Impacts of Urban Sprawl among Urban and Peri-Urban Dwellers of Hyderabad, India: A Latent Class Clustering Analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 12787-12812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01964-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoffmann, K., Pouliot, M., &amp; Muzalia, G. (2019). Constructed Anarchy: Governance, Conflict, and Precarious Property Rights in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Social Science Research Council.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jurkovi&amp;#269;, N. (2014). Perception, Experience and the Use of Public Urban Spaces by Residents of Urban Neighbourhoods. Urbani Izziv, 25, 107-125. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kabiso, A., Neill, E., Brereton, F., &amp; Abeje, W. (2022). Rapid Urbanization in Ethiopia: Lakes as Drivers and Its Implication for the Management of Common Pool Pesources. Sustainability, 14, Article 12788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912788</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kassoum, T. (2013). De la sensibilisation des populations à la gestion de l’environnement urbain dans les quartiers précaires de la Ville d’Abidjan. African Population Studies, 22, 154-173. https://doi.org/10.11564/22-2-333</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koranteng, A., Adu-Poku, I., Frimpong, B., Asamoah, N., Agyei, J., &amp; Zawi&amp;#322;a-Nied&amp;#378;wiecki, T. (2023). Urbanization and Other Land Use Land Cover Change Assessment in the Greater Kumasi Area of Ghana. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 11, 363-383. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.115022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kulimushi</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mugaruka</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Muhindo</surname><given-names> W.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Michellier</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Dewitte</surname><given-names> O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>. Landslides and Elements at Risk in the Wesha Watershed (Bukavu, DR Congo)</article-title><source> Geo-Eco-Trop</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 233</fpage>-<lpage>248</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lupiki</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Makinga</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Mizaba</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2020</year>)<article-title>. Guerres et occupation anarchique des espaces urbains en République Démocratique du Congo</article-title><source> Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 137</fpage>-<lpage>151</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magsi, H., Torre, A., Liu, Y., &amp; Sheikh, M. (2017). Land Use Conflicts in the Developing Countries: Proximate Driving Forces and Preventive Measures. The Pakistan Development Review, 56, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.30541/v56i1pp.19-30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maki Mateso</surname><given-names> J.-C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Dewitte</surname><given-names> O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>. Vers un inventaire des glissements de terrain et des éléments à risque sur les versants du Rift à l’Ouest du lac Kivu (RDC)</article-title><source> Geo-Eco-Trop</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 137</fpage>-<lpage>154</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mawemba</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>. Conséquences des constructions anarchiques dans la ville de Kinshasa</article-title><source> Education et Développement</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>17</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mevoa</surname><given-names> A.-M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Tohozin</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Mouhamadou</surname><given-names> T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>. Utilisation du SIG pour une réorganisation urbaine du centre-ville de Mbalmayo au Cameroun</article-title><source> Afrique SCIENCE</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 73</fpage>-<lpage>81</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mugaruka</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kulimushi</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Muhindo</surname><given-names> W.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Dewitte</surname><given-names> O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>. Glissement de terrain de Nyakavogo (Bukavu, RD Congo): Interaction entre facteurs naturels et anthropiques</article-title><source> Geo-Eco-Trop</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 249</fpage>-<lpage>261</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mulalisi</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>. Problématique de la gestion des déchets ménagers dans la ville de Bukavu D.R. Congo: Cas spécifique du quartier Panzi en commune d’Ibanda</article-title><source> International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research</source><volume> 23</volume>,<fpage> 98</fpage>-<lpage>104</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntamusimwa, V., Chuma, G., Kahindo, J., Cirezi, N., Mugumaarhahama, Y., Malela, R., et al. (2022). Uncontrolled Urbanization and Expected Unclogging of Congolese Cities: Case of Bukavu City, Eastern D.R. Congo. Environmental Challenges, 8, Article 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100555</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peltonen, L., &amp; Sairinen, R. (2010). Integrating Impact Assessment and Conflict Management in Urban Planning: Experiences from Finland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richards, D., Law, A., Tan, C., Shaikh, S., Carrasco, L., Jaung, W., &amp; Oh, Y. (2020). Rapid Urbanisation in Singapore Causes a Shift from Local Provisioning and Regulating to Cultural Ecosystem Services use. Ecosystem Services, 46, Article 1101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tohozin</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Guedegbe</surname><given-names> O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>. Utilisation du Système d’Information Géographique (SIG) pour la restructuration du Sud-Est de la ville de Porto-Novo, Bénin Résumé</article-title><source> Afrique SCIENCE</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 62</fpage>-<lpage>72</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Town</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> County</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Nyawade</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Omondi</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Chelanga</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>. Attitudes and Sustainable Urbanization: Towards Integrated Planning Model for Homa</article-title><source> International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 87</fpage>-<lpage>105</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Udessa, F., Adugna, D., &amp; Workalemahu, L. (2023). Socioeconomic Effects of Good Governance Practices in Urban. Land, 12, Article 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020369</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UEA-PNUD (2018). Catastrophe des risques dans les territoires d’Idjwi, Kalehe, Kabare et Walungu (pp. 1-38). Rapport de Terrain.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van Empel, C. (2008). The Effectiveness of Community Participation in Planning and Urban Development. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 117, 549-556. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC080521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.128405-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yi, Y., Zhao, Y., Ding, G., Gao, G., Shi, M., &amp; Cao, Y. (2016). Effects of Urbanization on Landscape Patterns in a Mountainous Area: A Case Study in the Mentougou District, Beijing, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8, Article 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111190</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>