<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2023.149070</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-127972</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation of Some Morphological and Yield Components Traits in Potato (&lt;i&gt;Solanum tuberosum&lt;/i&gt; L.) Collections
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Benoit</surname><given-names>Constant Likeng-Li-Ngue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aladji</surname><given-names>Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ndiang</surname><given-names>Zenabou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Florent</surname><given-names>Boris Zoa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbo</surname><given-names>Nkoulou Luther Fort</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Molo</surname><given-names>Nathalie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Essubalew</surname><given-names>Getachew Seyum</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hermine</surname><given-names>Ngalle Bille</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>Martin Bell</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Plant Production Unit, Mbalmayo Agricultural Research Centre (CRAM), Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, Mbalmayo, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Unity of Genetic and Plant Breeding, Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Horticulture and Plant Sciences, Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Plant Biology and Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences Applied to Agriculture, Faculty of Science, University of Ebolowa, Ebolowa, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1029</fpage><lpage>1042</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The study was conducted with the main objective to evaluate the genetic variability, heritability, and clustering pattern exploration of morphological and yield related traits in potato (
  Solanum tuberosum L.) collections in the bimodal rainfall agroecological zone of Cameroon using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The data obtained on morphological and yield traits were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results showed that the viability rate of the collections varied from 77.78
  %
   to 96.55% respectively for the Maffo and Desiree collections, while the greatest number of tubers per plant varied from 4 to 18 respectively for Synergie and Desiree. The emergence rate varies from 60
  %
   to 1.66% respectively for Maffo et Doza collections. However, Desiree presents the highest TL (96.55) while Maffo shows the lowest value (77.78%). The yield per hectare varied from 1.14 to 9.3 t/h for Maffo and Doza respectively. For all the characteristics observed, Phenotypic Coefficients of Variation (PCV) were higher than Genotypic Coefficients of Variation (GCV) suggesting the role of environment in the expression of traits under observation. The highest GCV and PCV 47.55 and 58.94 respectively were observed for Diameter at the collar (DC). Most of the traits showed high GAM (&gt;20%)) except Average Tuber Length (ATL) with a moderate value (19.8). In terms of vegetative development, the Desiree variety showed the highest performance. Based on the growth and yield results, Doza seems to be the most recommendable crop in the study area.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Agroecological Zone</kwd><kwd> Genetic Variability</kwd><kwd> Heritability</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Solanum tuberosum&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Yield</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an annual herbaceous, self-pollinated species that belongs to the family Solanaceae cultivated throughout the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref1">1</xref>] . The ranks as the most important food crop in the world after rice, wheat, and maize [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Over the last decade, Cameroonian national potato production has increased from 200,000 tons in 2011 to approximately 400,000 tons in 2020 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref3">3</xref>] . Potato is not only a widely used vegetable but also used for making processed foods and for manufacturing starch, and alcoholic beverages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref1">1</xref>] . It is commonly produced for its tuber, which mainly contains carbohydrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref4">4</xref>] . According to its important years, potato breeding has focused on tuber quality which should be a priority in breeding programs. However, the quality of these tubers varied according to the genotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref5">5</xref>] . Beyond quality, yields in terms of tubers per hectare which are strongly influenced by climatic variations are also important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref6">6</xref>] . By analyzing the Spatio-Temporal Rainfall Variability in Cameroon over the period 1950 to 2019, a previous study showed a reduction in temperatures in the different regions of the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref7">7</xref>] . The decreases observed for the northern regions of Cameroon are between −5.4% (Adamawa) and −7.4% (Far North). Those of western regions oscillate between −7.5% (South-West) and −12.5% (West) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref7">7</xref>] . However, according to their environmental conditions, potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), maize (Zea mays), and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) are the principal food crops of the Western Highlands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref8">8</xref>] . These crops, which adapt easily in this zone, would undergo variation once grown in other agro-ecological zones of Cameroon. This would pose a problem of adaptability and selection of the best genotypes suited to the soil and climate conditions. In order to increase potato production in Cameroon, it would be possible, thanks to the genetic diversity of this species, to find varieties that can withstand climatic variations in general and adapt to the soil and climatic conditions of the other agroecological zones of Cameroon specifically. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no scientific study to date on the response of potato varieties in all the agroecological zones of Cameroon. The present study aimed to analyze the Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation of some Yield Components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) collections at Leboudi II in the bimodal rainfall forest zone of Cameroon.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Site and Experimental Design</title><p>The work was carried out at Leboudi II (OKOLA district, L&#233;ki&#233; Department, Centre Region of Cameroon). This locality belongs to agroecological zone V or forest zone with bimodal rainfall. Rainfall is generally in the order of 1500 to 2000 mm/year with two distinct wet seasons. Over the year, the average temperature is 23&#176;C for an altitude of 797 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The experimental design consisted of four completely randomized blocks with three replications. The varieties studied were: Desiree, Banso, Panamera, Synergie, Maffo, Doza, and Cypira. Any variety was separated from the others by 0.5m aisles. Each block measured approximately 5m x 3m and consisted of seven (07) ridges each containing six (06) seedlings, separated from the others by a distance of twenty (20) cm.</p><p>Furthermore, the choice of the different potato collections was based on the varietal preferences of the growers and consumers, their availability and accessibility. It should be noted that each of these collections was all taken from growers in the of Bafou and Bamboutos localities of the Western Highlands of Cameroon.</p><p>Forty-eight hours (48) after the preparation of the experimental site, the potato tubers of the pre-germinated collections were planted. The maintenance consisted of weeding, followed by hoeing on the different ridges and around the experimental site. Watering was provided by rainfall in the locality.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection</title><p>Genetic traits of the seven genotypes of potatoes were evaluated based on morphological and yield parameters. Morphological parameters include plant height (PH), collar diameter (DC), emergence rate (TL), and viability rate (TV) evaluated 41 days after sowing. For the yield parameters, a total number of tubers (TNT), average tuber weight (AWT), average tuber volume (AVT), average tuber length (ALT), and number of tuber per plant (NTP) were determined.</p><p>The following parameters have been calculated as genetic parameters: grand mean, standard error of mean (SEM), critical difference (CD) 5%, critical difference (CD) 1%, environmental variance (VE), genotypic variance (VG), phenotypic variance (VP), environmental coefficient of variance (ECV), genotypic coefficient of variance (GCV), phenotypic coefficient of variance (PCV), broad sense heritability (H<sup>2</sup>), genetic advance (GA) and genetic advance as a percentage of mean (GAM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The data obtained were subjected to ANOVA with the software R (version 3.5.1) for the multiple comparisons of the means and their ranking, the Least Significance Test at the 5% threshold.</p><p>Principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were performed by the variability package of the software R (version 3.5.1). The classification of the collections has been done by ascendant classification. The biplot has been constructed to bring together varieties and parameters as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Agromorphological Variability of Potato</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Total Number of Plants per Tuber</title><p>The number of plants per tuber varies from 1 (Synergie) to 8 (Desiree). This parameter showed a significant difference between collections at the 5% level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Collar Diameter</title><p>The collar diameter varied from 0.2 to 0.7 cm for Synergie and Desiree respectively. The collar diameter shows a significant difference between collections at p &lt; 0.05 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Plant Height</title><p>The average plant height varies from 10 to 80 cm in Synergie and Desiree respectively. It shows a significant difference between the seven collections at p &lt; 0.05 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Productivity of Potato Collections</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Number of Tubers per Plant</title><p>The number of tubers harvested varies from 15 to 45 for Synergie and Desiree, respectively. The analysis of the data shows a significant difference between collections at p &lt; 0.05 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Tuber Weight</title><p>The weight values range from 0.2 kg to 0.5 kg for Maffo and Doza, respectively. Data analysis shows a significant difference between the collections at p &lt; 0.05 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Tuber Volume</title><p>The volume of the tubers is between 45 and 98 ml for Maffo and Cypira, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The data analysis showed a significant difference between the collections at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_4"><title>3.2.4. Tuber Length</title><p>The average length of tubers varies between 4.6 to 7.07 cm for Maffo and Doza, respectively. Data analysis has shown significant differences between collections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>The emergence rate (TL) varies from 60 &#224; 91.66% respectively for Maffo et Doza collections. However, Desiree presents the highest TV (96.55%) while Maffo shows the lowest value (77.78%). The yield per hectare of the collection varied from 1.14 to 9.3 t for Maffo and Doza respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Genetic Parameters</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Estimation of Principal Component Analysis</title><p>To determine the nature and degree of divergence between our collections, a PCA and hierarchical clustering (HC) were performed. Only the first two axes of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Emergence rate viability rate and yield parameters of potatoes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Varieties</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TL (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TV (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield (tons)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Desiree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banso</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panamera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Synergie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maffo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doza</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cypira</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>TL: Emergence rate, TV: Viability rate.</p><p>the principal component analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) expressing nearly 72% were taken into account. Axis 1, which contains 39.2%, is associated with the characters TL, Yield, AWT, AVT, and ALT.</p><p>Axis 2 which counts 32.8% associated with the variables such as TNT, NFP, DC and P_High. The combination between variables and collections showed that Desiree can be selected based on parameters such as TNT, NTP, DC, and PH while Doza can be selected based on TL, Yield, AWT, AVT, ALT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Estimates of Variance Components</title><p>The variability components of potatoes namely genotypic and phenotypic variance and coefficient of variations, heritability in a broad sense, and genetic advance as a percent of mean were estimated for seven traits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Phenotypic variance ranged from 0.015 to 141.54 respectively for AWT and TNT, while genotypic variance ranged from 0.0091 to 80.9 respectively for the same trait. All our studies traits showed that phenotypic variance is higher than genotypic variance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>)</p><p>Briefly, the result exhibited those genotypic coefficients of variance (σ<sup>2</sup> g)</p><p>varied from 12.01% to 47.55%. The length of tubers has the lowest coefficients while the DC has the highest coefficients. Phenotypic coefficients of variance ranged from 15.03% to 58.94% and the highest PCV was obtained from DC and the lowest from ALT. The phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) was relatively greater than the genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all traits. The environmental coefficient of variance ranged from 9.02 to 34.84 for the same traits.</p><p>The Relative Difference (RD) is the estimation of the ratio of GCV in association with the respective PCV and the estimated RD values varied from 0.11% to 24.59% for AWT and AVT respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Estimate of Broad Sense Heritability and Genetic Advance</title><p>The estimated broad sense heritability (H<sup>2</sup>) varied from 49% to 65%. The highest heritability was recorded for DC (65%) followed by ATL (64%) and AWT (61%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) and the lowest for 49% (AVT). Generally, moderate (30% ≤ h<sup>2</sup> ≤ 60%) heritability values were marked for AVT (49%), TNT (57%), and NTP (60%) whereas the rest of the traits expressed high (H<sup>2</sup> ≥ 60%) heritability values. Genetic Advance as percentage of mean (GAM) ranged from 19.8% to 79.03% respectively for ATL and DC.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Genetic parameters of potatoes under the bimodal rainfall forest zone of Cameroon</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genetic parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TNT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NTP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AWT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AVT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ATL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Error of Mean (SEM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Critical Difference (CD) 5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Critical Difference (CD) 1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Environmental Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >272.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genotypic Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenotypic Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >532.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.054</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Environmental Coefficient of Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genotypic Coefficient of Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenotypic Coefficient of Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heritability (Broad Sense)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genetic Advance (GA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genetic Advance as Percentage of Mean (GAM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.03</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>TNT: total number of tubers, NTP: number of tuber per plant, AWT: average weight of tuber, AVT: average volume of tuber, ALT: average length of tuber; DC: diameter at the collar.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Analysis of Correlation Coefficients</title><p>The Pearson correlation between the 10 traits showed that Tuber weight (AWT) was strongly and positively correlated with yield (r = 0.8) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). A strong positive correlation was also observed between the total number of tubers (TNT) and the number of tubers per plant (TNP). Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between tuber volume (AVT). On the other hand, DC was negatively correlated with tuber weight, tuber volume, and yield (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Cluster Analysis</title><p>The hierarchical ascending classification gives a structuring of the 8 potato collections in the bimodal rainfall zone of Cameroon into 3 groups using 6 morphological and 04 yield parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). Group II contains a single variety (Maffo) while groups I and III consist of 2 (Desir&#233;e and Sypira) and 4 (Doza, Synergire, Panamera and Banso) collections respectively.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Agromorphological Parameters</title><p>The number of tuber plants showed a significant difference between the collections studied. The results obtained in this work are close to those obtained in the Western Region of Cameroon in which the number of tillers per plant varied</p><p>between three and seven [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref13">13</xref>] . The height of the plants, which indicates plant biomass, varies from 4.5 cm to 80 cm respectively in Maffo and Desiree. Other researchers obtained values between 34 and 51 cm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref13">13</xref>] . In addition, the values of the diameter at the collar obtained ranged from 0.2 cm for Synergie to 0.7 cm for Desiree compared to those obtained in the West Cameroon region, which ranged from 0.65 cm to 0.91 cm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref13">13</xref>] . This would be due to the soil and climate conditions of the two cultivation zones. The differences observed in the different growth parameters in each variety can be explained by the effect of the variety on the vegetative growth of the different plants and the yield of each variety. Indeed, in their work, they demonstrate and confirm the influence of variety on the growth and development of plants. These results are also further confirmed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Productivity of Potato Varieties</title><p>The highest number of tubers per plant (15) was observed in Desiree in contrast to the Synergie variety whose average number was 4 tubers per plant. These results are similar to those obtained on the characterization of the potato in which the number of tubers per plant varied from 2 to 16 by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref15">15</xref>] . Furthermore, the collection with the most tubers had a non-proportional mean weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref16">16</xref>] and observed significant differences in 24 potato genotypes due to genetic differences. The differences would also be due to environmental factors such as soil nutrient richness. Another work showed that the available potassium had the strongest correlation with potato tuber yield which is also correlated with soil water content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref17">17</xref>] . The low production and productivity could be attributed to the infestation of disease on standing crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Genetic Parameters</title><p>The analysis of these results showed a positive correlation between the average weight of the tubers, the number of stems/plants, and the number of tubers. Traits with such a positive correlation with yield can optimize yield as a result of their simultaneous improvement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The seven varieties studied were subdivided into three clusters. These are respectively Desiree and Cypira (cluster I), Maffo (cluster II) and Doza, Panamera, Synergire, and Banso (cluster III). As in this work, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref15">15</xref>] clearly separated Cypira and Doza varieties into two clusters while [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref20">20</xref>] separated 146 samples into 27 groups based on 15 variables. This would be due to the environmental factors and the genotypes of the collections.</p><p>For all the variables, phenotypic coefficients of variation were higher than genotypic coefficients of variation suggesting the role of environment in the expression of traits under observation. These results are in line with those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref21">21</xref>] . The average tuber length is intermediate, while the other parameters show GCV and PCV values above 20%. The highest GCV (47.55) and PCV (58.94) were calculated for DC. On the contrary, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref22">22</xref>] obtained the highest value for the yield of tubers per plant and the number of tubers per plant. This highest value indicates a high potential for effective selection.</p><p>The GAM raged from 19.8 (ATL) to 79 (DC). According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref23">23</xref>] , the GAM was categorized as low (0 - 10%), moderate (10% - 20%), and high (&gt;20%). Most of the traits showed high GAM (&gt;20%) except ATL with a moderate value (19.8). The estimated values of heritability vary from 49 (AVT) to 65 (DC). These results are in line with those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>A moderate heritability and high GAM were observed for AVT, TNT, and NTP. ALT has presented a high heritability and a moderate GAM, while high heritability coupled with high GAM was observed for AWT and DC suggesting selection for these traits would give a good response. The same result has been obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref24">24</xref>] for the weight of the tuber and the number of tubers per vine on sweet potato. This result suggests that there may be the presence of additive gene action and selection will be rewarding for the improvement of such traits with a simple breeding method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref10">10</xref>] . According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref11">11</xref>] the effectiveness of selection is realized more quickly in those characters which have high heritability and high genetic advance.</p><p>The relative difference (RD) is the estimation of the ratio of GCV in association with the respective PCV and the estimated RD values varied from 0.11% to 24.59% for AWT and AVT respectively. High values indicate an environmental influence. All the above observations based on morphological analysis showed a strong variability among the used material in this study. This variability may be confirmed by molecular analysis as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127972-ref25">25</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>This study aimed to analyze the Genetic Variability, Heritability, and Correlation of some Yield and Yield Components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) collections in the bimodal rainfall forest zone of Cameroon. The number of tillers per plant varied from 3 to 7. The height of the plants, which indicates the plant biomass, varied from 4.5 cm to 80 cm in Maffo and Desiree respectively. The highest number of tubers (15) was observed in Desiree, in contrast to the Synergie collection, whose average number of tubers was 4 tubers. The heritability values ranged from 49% to 65%. A moderate heritability and high GAM were observed for AVT, TNT, and NTP. The Pearson correlation test between the agro-morphological traits observed showed a correlation between the variables studied. The differences observed in the different growth parameters in each of the collections can be explained by the effect of the collection on the vegetative growth of the individual plants and the yield of each collection.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank Mr. Kenfack Norbert for the seed he made available for this work.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Likeng-Li-Ngue, B.C., Ibram, A.A.M.M., Zenabou, N., Zoa, F.B., Fort, M.N.L., Nathalie, M., Seyum, E.G., Bille, H.N. and Bell, J.M. (2023) Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation of Some Morphological and Yield Components Traits in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Collections. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 14, 1029-1042. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2023.149070</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127972-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reddy, B.J., Mandal, R., Chakroborty, M., Hijam, L. and Dutta, P. (2018) A Review on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and Its Genetic Diversity. International Journal of Genetics, 10, 360-364. https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-2862.10.2.360-364</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akkale, C., Yildirim, Z., Yildirim, M.B., Kaya, C., &amp;#214;ztürk, G. and Tanyola&amp;#231;, B. (2010) Assessing Genetic Diversity Of Some Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15, 73-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atamja, L. and Yoo, S. (2022) Analysis of the Technical Efficiency of Potato Farmers in Mezam Division of the Northwest Region of Cameroon. Journal of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, 34, 118-133.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolessa, E.S. (2018) Importance, Nutrient Content and Factors Affecting Nutrient Content of Potato. American Journal of Food, Nutrition and Health, 3, 37-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbas, G., Frooq, K., Hafiz, I.A., Hussain, A., Abbasi, N.A. and Shabbir, G. (2011) Assessment of Processing and Nutritional Quality of Potato Genotypes in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 48, 169-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daccache, A., Keay, C., Jones, R.J.A., Weatherhead, E.K., Stalham, M.A. and Knox, J.W. (2012) Climate Change and Land Suitability for Potato Production in England and Wales: Impacts and Adaptation. Journal of Agricultural Science, 150, 161-177.  
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859611000839</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ebodé, V.B. (2022) Analysis of the Spatio-Temporal Rainfall Variability in Cameroon over the Period 1950 to 2019. Atmosphere, 13, Article No. 1769.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111769</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yengoh, G.T., Tchuinte, A., Armah, F.A. and Odoi, J.O. (2010) Impact of Prolonged Rainy Seasons on Food Crop Production in Cameroon. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15, 825-841.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9241-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bele, M.Y., Tiani, A.M., Somorin, O.A. and Sonwa, D.J. (2013) Exploring Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change of Communities in the Forest Zone of Cameroon. Climatic Change, 119, 875-889.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0738-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tessema, G.L., Mohammed, A.W. and Abebe, D.T. (2022) Genetic Variability Studies for Tuber Yield and Yield Attributes in Ethiopian Released Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties. PeerJ, 10, e12860. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12860</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hajam</surname><given-names> M.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Bhat</surname><given-names> T.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Rather</surname><given-names> A.M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Khan</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Reyaz</surname><given-names> L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Hajam</surname><given-names> M. and Paul</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.</surname><given-names> </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>Genetic Variability, Heritability (Bs) and Genetic Advance for Various Qualitative Characters of Potato</article-title><source> International Journal of Chemical Studies</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 518</fpage>-<lpage>522</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afuape, S.O., Okocha, P.I. and Njoku, D. (2011) Multivariate Assessment of the Agromorphological Variability and Yield Components among Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) Landraces. African Journal of Plant Science, 5, 123-132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchio, E.T., Meka, S.S. and Njualem, D.K. (2020) Screening of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Genotypes for Adaptability in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Asian Journal of Research in Botany, 4, 16-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fanos, T., Belew, D. and Nebiyu, A. (2015) Effect of Planting Depth and Time of Earthing-up on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Yield and Yield Components at Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, South West Ethiopia. International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 15, 61-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anoumaa, M., Kanmegne, G., Kouam, E.B., Amzati, G.S., Yao, N.K., Fonkou, T., Mbouobda, H.D., Arslanoglu, F. and Omokolo, D.N. (2016) Characterization of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Genotypes from the Western Highlands Region of Cameroon Using Morphological and Agronomic Traits. Journal of Plant Sciences, 4, 185-194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asefa, G., Mohammed, W. and Abebe, T. (2016) Genetic Variability Studies in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Genotypes in Bale Highlands, South Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 6, 117-119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, N., Xing, Y. and Wang, X. (2019) Exploring Options for Improving Potato Productivity through Reducing Crop Yield Gap in Loess Plateau of China Based on Grey Correlation Analysis. Sustainability, 11, Article No. 5621.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205621</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bajracharya, M. and Sapkota, M. (2017) Profitability and Productivity of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Baglung District, Nepal. Agriculture &amp; Food Security, 6, Article No. 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-017-0125-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fantaw, S., Nebiyu, A. and Beyene, T.M. (2014) Correlation and Path Coefficient Studies of Yield and Yield Related Characters in Tannia (Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott) Genotypes. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 11, 48-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arslanoglu, F., Aytac, S. and Oner, E.K. (2011) Morphological Characterization of the Local Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Genotypes Collected from the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 922-932.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Annigeri, S.V. and Hiremath, S.M. (2022) Genetic Variability Studies in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Genotypes under Northern Transitional Zone of Karnataka. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11, 1764-1767.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sattar, M.A., Sultana, N., Hossain, M.M., Rashid, M.H. and Islam, A.K.M.A. (2007) Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Bangladesh Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetic, 20, 33-38.  
https://doi.org/10.3329/bjpbg.v20i1.17023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herbert, W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955) Estimates of Genetic and Environmental Variability in Soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 47, 314-318.  
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhadauriya, P.S., Deo, C., Ram, C.N., Verma, S.K. and Singh, S. (2018) Studies on Genetic Variability, Heritability, Genetic Advance, Correlation Coefficient and D2 Analysis in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Indian Journal of Hill Farming, 31, 207-213.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127972-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Andrade, E.K.V., de Andrade Júnior, V.C., de Laia, M.L., Fernandes, J.S.C., Oliveira, A.J.M. and Azevedo, A.M. (2017) Genetic Dissimilarity among Sweet Potato Genotypes Using Morphological and Molecular Descriptors. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 39, 447-455. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v39i4.32847</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>