<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Computer and Communications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5219</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jcc.2023.119004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCC-127946</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Plant Disease Severity Assessment Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Survey
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Demba</surname><given-names>Faye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Idy</surname><given-names>Diop</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nalla</surname><given-names>Mbaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Doudou</surname><given-names>Dione</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marius</surname><given-names>Mintu Diedhiou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Polytechnic School of Dakar, University Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The world’s agricultural production suffers huge losses estimated between 20% and 40% annually. 40% to 50% of such losses are due to pest and diseases which cause significant economic losses every year. Precise assessment of severity is crucial for suitable management of crop diseases. It helps famers to avoid yield losses, reduce production costs, ensure good disease management and so on. This paper is a review of plant diseases severity estimation solutions proposed by researchers the last few years and based on Image Processing Techniques (IPT), classical Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms. The analysis of these solutions has allowed us to identify their limitations and potential challenges in plant disease severity assessment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Plant</kwd><kwd> Disease</kwd><kwd> Severity</kwd><kwd> Machine Learning</kwd><kwd> Deep Learning</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The world’s agricultural production suffers huge losses estimated between 20% and 40% every year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref2">2</xref>] . 40% to 50% of such losses are due to pest and diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref4">4</xref>] . These losses are both quantitative and qualitative and as a result, they are responsible for significant economic losses annually and affect the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of countries. Plant pest and disease protection has become an important research area, due to its highly correlation with food security, climate change and environmental sustainability. It is an essential tool for precision agriculture.</p><p>However, knowledge of the disease severity is an essential factor in crop disease protection and management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref5">5</xref>] . Crop disease severity is the ratio of plant units with visible disease symptoms to the total plant unit (e.g. fruit, leaf) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref6">6</xref>] . Diagnosis of crop disease and disease severity estimation are closely related. It is therefore essential to identify the disease severity stage as early as possible in order to remedy the yied loss. Traditional methods for disease severity estimatimation mostly rely on manual labor, which is labor-intensive, slow and highly subjective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref9">9</xref>] . It requires plant protection experts to visit the field to identify the disease and determine its severity.</p><p>In recent years, thanks to advances in computer imaging technology and improved hardware performance, computer vision and artificial intelligence have been widely used in agriculture for plant species classification, disease identification and plant disease severity assessment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref10">10</xref>] . Solutions proposed by researchers the last few years for disease severity estimation are based on images processing techniques (IPT), classical Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>This paper is a review of plant disease severity assessment solutions proposed by researchers the last few years. The specific contributions of this paper include:</p><p>&#183; Advantages of plant disease severity assessment.</p><p>&#183; Analysis of proposed crop diseases severity estimation solutions based on IPT, ML or DL.</p><p>&#183; Limitations of proposed solutions and potential challenges.</p><p>The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 identifies the advantages of plant disease severity assessment in agriculture, Sections 3 provides a critical analysis of the proposed solutions based on IPT, classical ML and DL algorithms, Section 4 shows the potential challenges in crop disease severity estimation and the last Section concludes the paper.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Advantages of Plant Disease Severity Assessment</title><p>In a field, a disease can spread rapidly over the entire crop batch and cause a field-wide epidemic, which is undoubtedly devastating. In order to effectively monitor and control such situations, it is important to specify earlier not only the type of disease, but also its severity, which is the ratio between the plant unit showing visible symptoms of the disease and the total plant unit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref6">6</xref>] . For example, the ratio of diseased area to leaf area (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). This is why the precise quantification of crop diseases is an absolute necessity in agriculture. Thus, asssessing disease severity enables growers to rationalize disease control, for example by deciding on the right dose of fungicide and type of pesticide, as well as the time of day to spray [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref11">11</xref>] . A reliable and accurate estimation of disease severity enables farmers to predict epidemics in their fields and yield losses, and to assess disease resistance in crop germplasm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref14">14</xref>] . It can also help farmers with pesticide management, disease forecasting, spatio-temporal epidemic modeling and crop loss modeling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref16">16</xref>] . Pesticide management plays an important role in protecting the environment by simultaneously reducing crop, soil and water pollution and avoiding pesticide residues in fruits</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref19">19</xref>] . Early disease severity estimation is essential in global food security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>However, traditionally, disease severity is determined manually by experts by estimating the visual surface area of lesions on plants (e.g. leaf, fruit, etc.). This process is slow, time-consuming, highly subjective and largely dependent on the level of experience of agronomists and farmers for visual scoring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref21">21</xref>] . Incorrect assessment of disease severity in plants can lead to erroneous conclusions, resulting in wasteful or inefficient use of pesticides, which can further exacerbate losses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref24">24</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Automatic Disease Severity Assessment</title><p>In the literature, several solutions have been proposed for estimating the severity of plant diseases. These solutions can be divided into three types:</p><p>&#183; Visual assessment, traditionally used by plant experts,</p><p>&#183; Solutions based on hyperspectral imaging (image processing techniques) or ML,</p><p>&#183; And more recently, solutions based on DL.</p><p>For the purposes of this paper, we worked on 47 articles whose work focused on estimating the severity of plant diseases. The articles were searched on Google Scholar, Springer Link, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Scientific Research, Frontiers, etc., using the keywords “disease-severity-assessment-plant”. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the number of studies carried out on this topic every year, between 2008 and 2023.</p><p>These work concerns different crops, different diseases and different approaches for determining disease severity. Among the crops covered by the 47 reviewed articles, tomato and maize are the most treated (8 times). It is followed by tomato (8 times), wheat (5 times) and strawberry (4 times) (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>The definition of the severity grades or lavels is essential in diseases severity estimation. Based on the 47 reviewed articles, we can say there are three categories of severity grades namely qualitative grade, quantitative grade and direct calculation of the percentage of the disease lesions (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). For example, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref18">18</xref>] used Healthy, Early, Middle and End severity levels which are qualitatives. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref25">25</xref>] used healthy (&lt;0.1%), very low (0.1% - 5%), low (5.1% - 10%), high (10.1% - 15%) and very high (&gt;15%) grades which are quantitatives. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref26">26</xref>] , the percentage of the disease lesions is directly calculated. In the following subsections, we take a closer look at solutions based on IPT and ML and DL algorithms.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Solutions Based on IPT</title><p>In agricultural research, IP technology has undergone significant development. Solutions based essentially on IP technology have been proposed by reseachers for assessing plant leaf disease severity. For instance, Wijekoon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref27">27</xref>] used multispectral images thresholding operation to calculate the ratio of infected area, lesion color index and severity index of soybean leaf infected by rust disease. Weizhong et al. used the Sobel operator to segment soybean rust disease and to determine the spot edge and disease severity of the plant, which is measured by calculating the quotient of disease spot area and leaf area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref28">28</xref>] . In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref29">29</xref>] , authors applied simple threshold and triangle thresholding methods to respectively segment the diseased leaf area and lesion region on the leaf. The results show an accuracy of 98.60% for estimating the severity of brown spot on soybean leaves. Thus IP technology to measure crop disease severity is convenient and accurate but the severity of the disease measured is depends upon segmentation of the image. Authors of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref30">30</xref>] developed a mobile application based on image processing. This app is able to calculate the severity percentage of six different diseases with typical lesions of varying severity. Palma et al. proposed an approach for automatic quantitative assessment of disease severity based on leaf images, regardless of disease type. The proposed method is based on a highly</p><p>efficient, noise-free positive nonlinear dynamic system that recursively transforms the image of the leaf until only the symptomatic patterns of the disease remain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref31">31</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Solutions Based on ML</title><p>In the literature, there are very few works based on classical ML algorithms for estimating crop disease severity. ML-based solutions often use IPT. IPT are used to improve the quality of the images used, while ML algorithms are used for image segmentation, feature extraction and image classification. For example, Owomugisha et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref32">32</xref>] used image processing technics and classical ML algorithms such as linear SVC, KNN and Extra Trees to classify four cassava diseases (mosaic, brown streak, bacterial blight and green mite) and assess their severity on diseased leaves. They used a dataset of 7386 images divided into 5 severity levels ranged from 1 to 5. They obtained accuracy scores of 99%. Authors of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref33">33</xref>] utilized ML models to detect and classify downy mildew (DM) disease severity in watermelon in five disease severity stages namely low, medium, high and very high. They used Hyperspectral watermelon leave images collected in laboratory and in the field by a UAV and implemented multilayer perceptron (MLP) and decision tree (DT). Results show that classification accuracy increased when the disease severity increased and the best classification results were obtained from the MLP method in high and very high severity stages (87% - 90%). Jiang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref34">34</xref>] used two unsupervised learning algorithms namely K-means clustering and spectral clustering and three supervised learning algorithms including SVM, RF, and KNN to assess the severity of wheat leaf stripe rust disease. They used a dataset of 400 samples splitted into height severity levels namely 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. RF model obtained the best assessment performance with an overall accuracy of 100%. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes the above-mentioned works according to the year of publication, the crop concerned, the parts of the crop infected, the diseases treated, the disease severity grades, source of the dataset and the algorithms used.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Solutions Based on DL</title><p>Based on the 47 articles we worked on, the majority of solutions proposed for estimating plant disease severity are based on DL and essentially on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). DL-based solutions can be divided into two categories: CNN-based solutions and CNN-based segmentation networks. These solutions generally follow the workflow described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. CNN-Based Solutions</title><p>During the last decade, several solutions based on CNN have been proposed in the filed of crop diseases diagnosis. The estimation of disease severity, an extension of disease diagnosis, is also an area in which several CNN-based solutions have been proposed in recent years. For instance, automatic disease severity assessement of plant based on CNN was first proposed in 2017 by Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of solutions based on ML</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Article</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crop</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Part</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diseases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Severity Grade/Level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dataset</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Models used</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref32">32</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava mosaic, Cassava brown streak, Cassava bacterial blight, Cassava green mite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 severity levels ranged from 1 to 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (7.386 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SVC, KNN and Extra Trees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy scores close to 99%.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Watermelon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Downy mildew</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low, medium 1, medium 2, high and very high</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLP and DT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Best performance: 87% - 90% of accuracy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wheat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stripe rust</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (400 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K-Means, Spectral clustering, SVM, RF and KNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KNN: 100% of overall accuracy</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Similarly, several authors have proposed plant disease severity assessment solutions based on well-known CNN such as VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, ResNet50, ResNet101, Inception-V3, GoogLeNet, AlexNet, SqueezeNet, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, NASNetMobile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref24">24</xref>] . Some authors have proposed their own CNNs, which have given better results than well-known CNNs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref35">35</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref41">41</xref>] . Some solutions are based on the combination of CNN and classical ML algorithms such as Random Forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref19">19</xref>] and SVM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref13">13</xref>] . Among these CNN-based solutions, several have used the principle of Multi-task learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref42">42</xref>] . Multi-task learning, as opposed to single-task learning, is a learning principle in which several linked tasks can be learned simultaneously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref1">1</xref>] . Plant disease classification and disease severity estimation are two related tasks, which can be learned simultaneously using multitask learning. Multi-task learning is more advantageous than Single-task learning because it can reduce the risk of overfitting and lead to better generalization of a model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>These CNN-based solutions have achieved extraordinary performances ranging from 70% to 99% accuracy.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> is a summarize of theses above-mentioned works according to the year of publication, type of architecture (single or multi task), crop concerned, parts of the crop infected, diseases treated, the disease severity grades, source of the dataset, models used and results obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. CNN-Based Segmentation Networks Solutions</title><p>CNN-based segmentation is widely used in object detection and localization. CNN-based segmentation networks have also been used to assess the severity of plant diseases and other related agricultural tasks. Of the 47 articles reviewed, seven used a CNN-based segmentation network, such as Unet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref12">12</xref>] , Mask R-CNN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref51">51</xref>] , Faster R-CNN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref42">42</xref>] , SegNet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref26">26</xref>] , DeepLav [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref26">26</xref>] and so on. They are based on segmentation of infected areas (of the leaf, fruit, etc.) to quantify disease severity (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). For crop disease severity assessment. Su et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref49">49</xref>] proposed a solution based on Mask-RCNN for the detection and severity estimation of Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) on wheat spikes. Authors defined fifteen severity grades (from grade 0 to grade 14). The proposed solution achieved accuracies of 77.76% and 98.81%, respectively for FHB detection and severity assessment. Chen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref20">20</xref>] developped a Deep Learning algorithm (BLSNet) based on Unet for rice leaf bacterial lesion segmentation and severity estimation. Goncalves et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref26">26</xref>] used six CNNs namely Unet, SegNet, PSPNet, FPN, DeepLabV3 (Xception) and DeepLabV3 (MobileNetV2) to estimate the severity of Coffee leaf miner, soybean rust and wheat. They used a dataset for each of the three diseases. Results show that average precision values are ranged from 90.4% to 95.6% and recall values are ranged from 89.4% to 94.7%. Hu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>] used Faster R-CNN and VGG16 for detection and severity assessment of tea leaf blight disease, respectively. Detection average precision and the severity grading accuracy improved by more than 6% and 9%, respectively, compared to existing solutions. Pillay et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref51">51</xref>] applied Mask R-CNN to quantify the severity of common rust disease in maize leaf. The Mask R-CNN performed better than standard image processing algorithms more than 5%. Gerber et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref51">51</xref>] examined automated tuning of Mask R-CNN parameters which are very numerious and use also a genetic algorithm (GA) in order to enhance performance achieved in their previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref50">50</xref>] . Pan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref42">42</xref>] proposed a two-stage model including object detection by Faster R-CNN and few-shot learning by siamese network to estimate strawberry leaf scorch severity. The proposed two-stage method achieved the highest estimation accuracy of 96.67%. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> is a summarize of theses above-mentioned works according to the year of publication, type of architecture (single or multi task), crop concerned, parts of the crop infected, diseases treated, the disease severity grades, source of the dataset, models used</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of CNN-based solutions</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Article</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ann&#233;e</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Single/ Multi task</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crop</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Part</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diseases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Severity Grade/ Level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dataset</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Models used</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref18">18</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >apple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >black rot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healthy, Early, Middle and End</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Village</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lightweight CNN, VGG16, ResNet50 and Inception-V3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Best accuracy with VGG16: 90.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref10">10</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-task</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >apple, grape, cherry, peach, pepper, tomato, Strawberry, Potato, Corn curvularia, Puccinia polysora, Cercospora zeaemaydis…</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >general and serious</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Synthetic dataset from AI Challenger Global AI Contest (www.challenger.ai) and from others reseach works</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PD2SE-Net50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracies of 0.99, 0.98 and 0.91, respectively for species recognition, disease classification and disease severity estimation.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Early Blight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >healthy, mild, moderate, and severely diseased leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Village (1000 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ResNet101, VGG16, VGG19, GoogLeNet, AlexNet, and ResNet50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >accuracy: 94.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref22">22</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Citrus (sweet orange)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huanglongbing (HLB) or Citrus Greening disease or citrus “cancer”</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Early Stage, Moderate Stage, and Severely Infected Stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Village and crowdAI (5406 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AlexNet, DenseNet-169, Inception v3, ResNet-34, SqueezeNet-1.1, and VGG13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >accuracy: 92.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref25">25</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >multi-task,</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf miner, rust, brown leaf spot and cercospora leaf spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >healthy (&lt;0.1%), very low (0.1% - 5%), low (5.1% - 10%), high (10.1% - 15%) and very high (&gt;15%).</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 1747 images</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AlexNet, GoogleNet, VGG19 and ResNet50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracies of 94.05% for biotic stress classication and 84.76% for severity estimation.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref14">14</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-task</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >corn, grap, peach, pepper, patato, strawberry, tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Puccinia Polysora, Curvularia Leaf Spot Fungus, Black Rot Fungus, Black Measles Fungus, Bacterial Spot, Late Blight Fungus, Early Bligh Fungus, scorch, Leaf Mold Fungus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >normal, general and serious</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IA Challenger (12.691 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BR-CNN based on DenseNet121, InceptionV3, NasNet or ResNet50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BR-CNN based on ResNet50 obtained the best accuracy (86.70%).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref24">24</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Single</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grape</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf Blight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >early, middle &amp; end</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Village (1293 images)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AlexNet and ResNet18</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AlexNet accuracy: 90.31%; ResNet accuracy: 87.6%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref4">4</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >multi-task</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pear</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biotic stresses: leaf spot, leaf curl, and slug damage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No risk (0%), very low (1% - 5%), low (6% - 20%), medium (21% - 25%), and high (&gt;50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DiaMOS Plant dataset, a self-collected dataset</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ResNet50, VGG-16, VGG-19, MobileNetV2, EfficientNetB0 and InceptionV3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >InceptionV3 obtained bests accuracies of 90.68% and 74.07% for biotic stress and severity estimation, respectively.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref44">44</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset and Plant Village dataset</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proposed lightweight CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >accuracies of 97.9% and 90.6% on the Plant Village dataset and plant disease severity dataset, respectively</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref21">21</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >late blight lesion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 70 original images</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proposed Deep Learning algorithm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IoU values of background (soil and leaf) and lesion classes in the test dataset are 0.996 and 0.386, respectively.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref23">23</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wheat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow rust</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No disease, resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, or susceptible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 10,500 images</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow-Rust-Xception</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy: 91%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cucumber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angular Spot, Anthracnose, Black Spot, Brown Spot, Downy Mildew, Gray Mold, Powdery Mildew and Target Spot.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Village (689 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy: 93.75%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spotted Wilt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >early, middle and least</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (3000 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >binary classification: 91.56% of accuracy and multi-classification: 95.23% of accuracy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-task</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mustard</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Downy mildew</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 severity levels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Binary classification: 95.6% of accuracy and multi-classification: 96.66% of accuracy</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref36">36</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-task</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Corn/ma&#239;ze</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gray leaf spot</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5 severity levels</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >proposed CNN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aaccuracy of 95.33%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wheat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spike/ fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium head blight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (3.600 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AlexNet and Random Forest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref7">7</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternaria Leaf Blotch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >healthy (0), early (0 - 0.95%), mild (0.95% - 1.75%), moderate (1.75% - 3.00%) and severe (3.00% - 100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 5382 samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DeeplabV3+, Unet PSPNet, VGG, ResNet and MobileNetV2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean accuracy of 96.41%.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref45">45</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strawberry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray mold</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 400 samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unet, XGBoost, K-means, Otsu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IoU accuracy, pixel accuracy, and dice accuracy are 82.12%, 98.24% and 89.71% respectively.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref46">46</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#168;Paddy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacterial blight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >healthy, infected but disease is not severe, and infected and disease is severe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (650 samples)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed-CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy of 97.692%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref47">47</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >potato blight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1% - 20%, 21% - 40%, 41% - 60%, 61% - 80%, and 81% - 100%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset (9600 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy: 86.625%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Begomovirus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 severity levels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MRNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paprika</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf &amp; fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blossom end rot, ray mold, powdery mildew, snails and slugs, spider mite, and Cercospora</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 severity levels.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (6.000 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed-CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean average Precision: 91.7% for the abnormality detection; Mean panoptic quality score: 70.78% for severity level prediction.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref5">5</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maydis leaf blight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >low, medium and high</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-created (1.760 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed-CNN, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, Xception, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2 and NASNetMobile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proposed-CNN (accuracy: 99.13% and f1_score: 98.97%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_4"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref40">40</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Single</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rice</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bacterial Blight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 classes of severity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Internet (1856 images)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CNN-LSTM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy: 92%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice/Paddy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blast</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mild, average, severe, and profound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mendeley, Kaggle, GitHub, and UCI (1908 images overall)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CNN-SVM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy: 97%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref15">15</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected and PlantVillage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VGG-16/VGG-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VGG-16: accuracy of 92.46%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref2">2</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mango</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Powdery mildew</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 disease levels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected (2559 images)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CNN-SVM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accuracy: 89.29%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mango</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >beginning, mild, moderate and severe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >proposed-CNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>and results obtained.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Limitations of Proposed Solutions and Potential Challenges</title><p>Results obtained by solutions based on IPT, classic ML and DL algorithms are very promising in crop disease severity estimation. They help to avoid yield losses, reduce production costs, ensure good disease management and so on.</p><p>However, these solutions have limitations that need to be overcome:</p><p>&#183; For IPT-based solutions, quality of the images has a strong influence on image segmentation and, consequently, on the determination of the area infected by a disease. To obtain good results in quantifying disease severity, it is essential to use high-quality images (noiseless, without complex backgrounds, etc.).</p><p>&#183; Estimating the severity of a crop disease from an image containing several leaves is not addressed in the reviewed works, but it is a situation that can occur in real life.</p><p>&#183; The accuracy of severity classification increases with the severity of the crop disease. In other words, for solutions using quantitative severity levels, it is difficult to quantify disease at an early stage.</p><p>&#183; For solutions using qualitative or quantitative severity grades, image labeling has a major impact on the classification result, and must therefore be carried out by an expert. A bad image labeling systematically leads to incorrect quantification of disease severity and, consequently, to poor a disease management.</p><p>&#183; For solutions using the segmentation of disease lesions (on leaves, fruit, etc.), much of the edge information is lost, impacting the result of disease severity quantification.</p><p>&#183; Crop diseases can affect leaves, fruits, flowers, panicles and so on. But until now, researchers have focused on assessing only the severity of leaf diseases.</p><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of CNN-based segmentation networks</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Article</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Single/ Multi task</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crop</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Part</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diseases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Severity Grade/Level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dataset</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Models used</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref49">49</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wheat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spike/fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium head blight (FHB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade 0: [0 - 1%], Grade 1: (1% - 2.5%], Grade 2: (2.5% - 5%], Grade 3: (5% - 7.5%], Grade 4: (7.5% - 10%], Grade 5: (10% - 12.5%], Grade 6: (12.5% - 15%], Grade 7: (15% - 17.5%], Grade 8: (17.5% - 20%], Grade 9: (20% - 25%], Grade 10: (25% - 30%], Grade 11: (30% - 40%], Grade 12: (40% - 50%], Grade 13: (50% - 60%], Grade 14: (60% - 100%]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 690 images</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mask-RCNN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >accuracies of 77.76% and 98.81%, respectively for FHB detection and severity assessment.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacterial Leaf Streak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level 0: no lesion; Level 1: lesion &lt; 10%; Level 2 = 11% - 25% lesion; Level 3: 26% - 45% lesion; Level 4: 46% - 65% lesion; Level 5: &gt;65% lesion.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 109 images</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proposed Deep Learning algorithm named BLSNet and based on Unet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average accuracy: 94%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee, Soybean and Wheat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee leaf miner, Soybean rust and Wheat tan spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Three self-collected datasets: Coffee 406 images; Soybean 208 images and Wheat 152 images.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unet, SegNet, PSPNet, FPN, DeepLabV3 (Xception) and DeepLabV3 (MobileNetV2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average precision values are ranged from 90.4% to 95.6% and recall values are ranged from 89.4% to 94.7%.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-task</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf blight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mild and severe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected dataset of 398 images</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Faste R-CNN and VGG16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >detection average precision and the severity grading accuracy improved by more than 6% and 9%, respectively, compared to existing solutions.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref50">50</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Single</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Common Rust</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mask R-CNN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mask R-CNN performed better than standard image processing algorithms more than 5%.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref51">51</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Common Rust</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mask R-CNN and GA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref42">42</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-task</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strawberry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scorch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-collected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Faster R-CNN (VGG16) and Siamese networks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >accuracy of 96.67%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Estimating plant disease severity on other parts, such as fruits, would also be of great use in crop disease management.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions and Future Works</title><p>Diagnosing crop diseases goes hand in hand with assessing their severity. Estimating the severity of diseases is very useful for plant disease management. Several solutions based on IPT, ML or DL have been proposed by researchers to estimate the crop diseases severity. These solutions have achieved very impressive results, but have limitations that need to be taken into account.</p><p>For future work, we aim to propose a CNN-based solution to assess the severity of four mango fruit diseases namely anthracnose, Alternaria, black mould rot and stem and rot. This solution will be adapted to the reality of Africa in general, and Senegal in particular, since we will use the MangoFruitDDS dataset [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127946-ref52">52</xref>] containing images of the above-mentioned diseases and collected in an orchard located in Senegal.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Faye, D., Diop, I., Mbaye, N., Dione, D. and Diedhiou, M.M. (2023) Plant Disease Severity Assessment Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Survey. Journal of Computer and Communications, 11, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2023.119004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127946-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, A., Saraswat, D. and El Gamal, A. (2023) A Survey on Using Deep Learning Techniques for Plant Disease Diagnosis and Recommendations for Development of Appropriate Tools. Smart Agricultural Technology, 3, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banerjee, D., Kukreja, V., Hariharan, S. and Jain, V. (2023) Enhancing Mango Fruit Disease Severity Assessment with CNN and SVM-Based Classification. 2023 IEEE 8th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Lonavla, 7-9 April 2023, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CT57861.2023.10126397</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Faye, D. and Diop, I. (2022) Survey on Crop Disease Detection and Identification Based on Deep Learning. In: Mambo, A.D., Gueye, A. and Bassioni, G., Eds., InterSol 2022: Innovations and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Underserved Areas, Springer, Cham, 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23116-2_18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fenu, G. and Malloci, F.M. (2021) Using Multioutput Learning to Diagnose Plant Disease and Stress Severity. Complexity, 2021, Article ID: 6663442. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6663442</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haque, M.A., Marwaha, S., Arora, A., Deb, C.K., Misra, T., Nigam, S. and Hooda, K.S. (2022) A Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for Recognition of Severity Stages of Maydis Leaf Blight Disease of Maize. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, Article 1077568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1077568</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, T., Liu, Y., Zheng, X., et al. (2023) Recent Advances in Plant Disease Severity Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 2336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29230-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, B.Y., Fan, K.J., Su, W.H. and Peng, Y. (2022) Two-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks for Diagnosing the Severity of Alternaria Leaf Blotch Disease of the Apple Tree. Remote Sensing, 14, Article 2519. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112519</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, G.S., Wang, H.Y., Zhang, Y. and Wan, M.Z. (2021) Detection and Severity Analysis of Tea Leaf Blight Based on Deep Learning. Computers &amp; Electrical Engineering, 90, Article ID: 107023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bock, C.H., Poole, G.H., Parker, P.E. and Gottwald, T.R. (2010) Plant Disease Severity Estimated Visually, by Digital Photography and Image Analysis, and by Hyperspectral Imaging. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29, 59-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352681003617285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liang, Q., Xiang, S., Hu, Y., Coppola, G., Zhang, D. and Sun, W. (2019) PD2SE-Net: Computer-Assisted Plant Disease Diagnosis and Severity Estimation Network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 157, 518-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agarwal, M., Gupta, S. and Biswas, K.K. (2021) A New Conv2D Model with Modified ReLU Activation Function for Identification of Disease Type and Severity in Cucumber Plant. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 30, Article ID: 100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100473</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rabhakar, M., Purushothaman, R. and Awasthi, D.P. (2020) Deep Learning Based Assessment of Disease Severity for Early Blight in Tomato Crop. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79, 28773-28784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09461-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lamba, S., Kukreja, V., Baliyan, A., Rani, S. and Ahmed, S.H. (2023) A Novel Hybrid Severity Prediction Model for Blast Paddy Disease Using Machine Learning. Sustainability, 15, Article 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021502</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ji, M.M., Zhang, K.K., Wu, Q.F. and Deng, Z. (2020) Multi-Label Learning for Crop Leaf Diseases Recognition and Severity Estimation Based on Convolutional Neural Networks. Soft Computing, 24, 15327-15340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04866-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, R., Chug, A. and Singh, A.P. (2023) Plant Leaf Diseases Severity Estimation using Fine-Tuned CNN Models. 2023 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON), Mathura, 3-7 March 2023, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON57294.2023.10111948</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ilyas, T., Jin, H., Siddique, M.I., Lee, S.J., Kim, H. and Chua, L. (2022) DIANA: A Deep Learning-Based Paprika Plant Disease and Pest Phenotyping System with Disease Severity Analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, Article 983625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.983625</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schneider, S.J., Da Graca, J.V., Skaria, M., Little, C.R., Setamou, M. and Kunta, M. (2013) A Visual Rating Scale for Quantifying the Severity of Greasy Spot Disease on Grapefruit Leaves. International Journal of Fruit Science, 13, 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2013.789273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, G., Sun, Y. and Wang, J.X. (2017) Automatic Image-Based Plant Disease Severity Estimation Using Deep Learning. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2017, Article ID: 2917536. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2917536</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gu, C., Wang, D., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, D. and Liang, D. (2021) Fusion of Deep Convolution and Shallow Features to Recognize the Severity of Wheat Fusarium Head Blight. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, Article 599886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.599886</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, S., Zhang, K., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., Ban, W., Chen, Y., Zhuang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, J. and Yang, T. (2021) An Approach for Rice Bacterial Leaf Streak Disease Segmentation and Disease Severity Estimation. Agriculture, 11, Article 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050420</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, J.F., Westergaard, J.C., Sundmark, E.H.R., Bagge, M., Liljeroth, E. and Alexandersson, E. (2021) Automatic Late Blight Lesion Recognition and Severity Quantification Based on Field Imagery of Diverse Potato Genotypes by Deep Learning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 214, Article ID: 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106723</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, Q.M., Ma, X.H., Cheng, B.P., Zhou, E. and Pang, W. (2020) GANs-Based Data Augmentation for Citrus Disease Severity Detection Using Deep Learning. IEEE Access, 8, 172882-172891. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025196</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayit, T., Erbay, H., Var&amp;imath;n, F., Hayit, F. AND Akci, N. (2021) Determination of the Severity Level of Yellow Rust Disease in Wheat by Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Journal of Plant Pathology, 103, 923-934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-021-00886-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Verma, S., Chug, A. and Singh, A.P. (2020) Impact of Hyperparameter Tuning on Deep Learning Based Estimation of Disease Severity in Grape Plant. In: Ghazali, R., Nawi, N., Deris, M. and Abawajy, J., Eds., SCDM 2020: Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining, Springer, Cham, 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36056-6_16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esgario, J.G.M., Krohling, R.A. and Ventura, J.A. (2020) Deep Learning for Classification and Severity Estimation of Coffee Leaf Biotic Stress. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 169, Article ID: 105162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gonalves, J.P., Pinto, F.A.C., Queiroz, D.M., Villar, F.M.M., Barbedo, J.G.A. and Del Ponte, E.M. (2021) Deep Learning Architectures for Semantic Segmentation and Automatic Estimation of Severity of Foliar Symptoms Caused by Diseases or Pests. Biosystems Engineering, 210, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.08.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wijekoon, C.P., Goodwin, G.H. and Hsiang, T. (2008) Quantifying Fungal Infection of Plant Leaves by Digital Image Analysis Using Scion Image Software. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 74, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, W.Z., Wu, Y.C., Chen, Z.L. and Wei, H.D. (2008) Grading Method of Leaf Spot Disease Based on Image Processing. 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Wuhan, 12-14 December 2008, 491-494. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.1649</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patil, S.B. and Bodhe, S.K. (2011) Leaf Disease Severity Measurement Using Image Processing. International Journal of Engineering &amp; Technology, 3, 297-301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pethybridge, S.J. and Nelson, S.C. (2015) Leaf Doctor: A Newportable Application for Quantifying Plant Disease Severity. Plant Disease, 99, 1310-1316. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0319-RE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Owomugisha, G. and Mwebaze, E. (2016) Machine Learning for Plant Disease Incidence and Severity Measurements from Leaf Images. 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Anaheim, 18-20 December 2016, 158-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palma, D., Blanchini, F. and Montessoro, P. (2022) A System-Theoretic Approach for Image-Based Infectious Plant Disease Severity Estimation. PLOS ONE, 17, e0272002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdulridha, J., Ampatzidis, Y., Qureshi, J. and Roberts, P. (2022) Identification and Classification of Downy Mildew Severity Stages in Watermelon Utilizing Aerial and Ground Remote Sensing and Machine Learning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, Article 791018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.791018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, Q., Wang, H. and Wang, H. (2023) Severity Assessment of Wheat Stripe Rust Based on Machine Learning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, Article 1150855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1150855</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R., Kukreja, V. and Sakshi (2021) Mustard Downy Mildew Disease Severity Detection Using Deep Learning Model. 2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Sakheer, 7-8 December 2021, 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682305</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baliyan, A., Kukreja, V., Salonki, V. and Kaswan, K.S. (2021) Detection of Corn Gray Leaf Spot Severity Levels Using Deep Learning Approach. 2021 9th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, 3-4 September 2021, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO51393.2021.9596540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Verma, S., Chug, A. and Singh, A.P. (2020) Application of Convolutional Neural Networks for Evaluation of Disease Severity in Tomato Plant. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 23, 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2020.1721890</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salonki, V., Baliyan, A., Kukreja, V. and Siddiqui, K.M. (2021) Tomato Spotted Wilt Disease Severity Levels Detection: A Deep Learning Methodology. 2021 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), Noida, 26-27 August 2021, 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN52536.2021.9566053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mubarokah, I., Laksono, P., Cepy, Safitri, R. and Idris, I. (2022) Detection of Begomovirus Disease for Identification of Disease Severity Level in Tomato Leaves Using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). 2022 International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices (ISESD), Bandung, I8-9 November 2022, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESD56103.2022.9980675</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lamba, S., Baliyan, A., Kukreja, V. and Tripathy, R. (2023) An Ensemble (CNN-LSTM) Model for Severity Detection of Bacterial Blight Rice Disease. In: Marriwala, N., Tripathi, C., Jain, S. and Kumar, D., Eds., Mobile Radio Communications and 5G Networks, Springer, Singapore, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7982-8_14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehta, S., Kukreja, V. and Yadav, R. (2023) Advanced Mango Leaf Disease Detection and Severity Analysis with Federated Learning and CNN. 2023 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), Hubli, 23-25 June 2023, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIT59222.2023.10205922</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pan, J.C., Xia, L.M., Wu, Q.F., Guo, Y.X., Chen, Y.P. and Tian, X.L. (2022) Automatic Strawberry Leaf Scorch Severity Estimation via Faster R-CNN and Few-Shot Learning. Ecological Informatics, 70, Article ID: 101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101706</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y. and Yang, Q. (2021) A Survey on Multi-Task Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34, 5586-5609. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3070203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiang, S., Liang, Q., Sun, W., Zhang, D. and Wang, Y. (2021) L-CSMS: Novel Lightweight Network for Plant Disease Severity Recognition. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 128, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00423-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhujel, A., Khan, F., Basak, J.K., Jaihuni, M., Thavisack, S., Moon, B.E., Park, J. and Kim, H.T. (2022) Detection of Gray Mold Disease and Its Severity on Strawberry Using Deep Learning Networks. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 129, 579-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-022-00578-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhiman, A. and Saroha, V. (2022) Detection of Severity of Disease in Paddy Leaf by Integrating Edge Detection to CNN-Based Model. 2022 9th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, 23-25 March 2022, 470-475. https://doi.org/10.23919/INDIACom54597.2022.9763128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jindal, V., Nagpal, Y. and Kukreja, V. (2022) CNN Implementation for Severity Levels of Potato Blight Disease. 2022 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI), Sakhir, 25-26 October 2022, 438-443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDABI56818.2022.10041501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sreedevi, A. and Manike, C. (2022) A Smart Solution for Tomato Leaf Disease Classification by Modified Recurrent Neural Network with Severity Computation. Cybernetics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2022.2122004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Su, W.H., Zhang, J., Yang, C., Page, R., Szinyei, T., Hirsch, C.D. and Steffenson, B.J. (2021) Automatic Evaluation of Wheat Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight Using Dual Mask-RCNN Deep Learning Frameworks in Computer Vision. Remote Sensing, 13, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pillay, N., Gerber, M., Holan, K., Whitham, S.A. and Berger, D.K. (2021) Quantifying the Severity of Common Rust in Maize Using Mask R-CNN. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R. and Zurada, J.M., Eds., ICAISC 2021: Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, Springer, Cham, 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87986-0_18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerber, M., Pillay, N., Holan, K., Whitham, S.A. and Berger, D.K. (2021) Automated Hyper-Parameter Tuning of a Mask R-CNN for Quantifying Common Rust Severity in Maize. 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Shenzhen, 18-22 July 2021, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9534417</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127946-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faye, D., Diop, I., Mbaye, N., Diedhiou, M.M. and Dione, D. (2023) Mango Fruit DDS. Mendeley Data, V3.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>