<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2023.149066</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-127823</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Seed Dispersal of &lt;i&gt;Citharexylum tetramerum&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Ziziphus penduculata&lt;/i&gt; by Carnivorous in a Xerophilous Scrub at Tehuacan, Puebla, Mexico
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>González-Pérez</surname><given-names>Adrián</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Miguel</surname><given-names>A. Armella</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>de Lourdes Yáñez-López</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>María</surname><given-names>de Lourdes Martinez-Cárdenas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Alejandro Zavala-Hurtado</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biotechnology, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Health Sciences, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>977</fpage><lpage>987</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Seed dispersion reduces the depredation rate and increases genetic flow. Some species of Carnivora consume fruits as a standard component of their diet, so they become potential seed dispersers. In Mexico, a few studies evaluated carnivorous as seed dispersers, especially in dry ecosystems. 
  Citharexylum tetramerum and 
  Ziziphus pedunculata are endemic plants from the Tehuac&#225;n-Cuicatl&#225;n’s Biosphere Reserve (TCBR); however, there are very little data about dispersal seeds for both species. We assessed the germination of seeds ingested by carnivores obtained from feces. We compared them with seeds from fruits as a control group. At the Metropolitan University laboratory, we germinated seeds, from: plants, scats, and fruits, and we used Kruskall Wallis Test to compare percentage and germination rate. 
  C.
   tetramerum seeds ingested by a carnivorous decreased in germination percentage and rate. In contrast, the percentage and rate of germination of 
  Z.
   pedunculata seeds from carnivorous feces were higher than the control group. However, 
  Z.
   pedunculata control seeds did not germinate during tests, but at the end of the tests, we found that 90% of control seeds were not dead, so they were dormant seeds. Carnivores interact as legitime dispersers for both plants because they are keeping the viability of seeds. Still, we only showed that 
  Z.
   pedunculata gut carnivores broke with the dormancy of seeds. We consider that in future research, it could be essential to identify other animals that consume fruits of those plants and if it is possible to follow seeds after they have been removed. Those points could help to get better understanding of those endemic plants from Tehuac&#225;n.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Seed Dispersal</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Plants benefit from seed dispersal because they decrease depredation rate and increase genetic flow and colonization of new habitats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref5">5</xref>] . The quantity and quality components determine dispersal seeds’ effectiveness; quality requires qualitative elements affecting the ability of the seed to find a safe place to germinate and how the disperser could influence the germination process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Many plant species have evolved to use different media in order to reach longer distances for the seeds dispersal, these media frequently involved animals and have developed syndroms, or a group of special characteristic to attract animals in order to be a disperser [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref7">7</xref>] . Use of animals to disperse seeds is called zoochory, and when it is inside the animals body it is called endozoochory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref8">8</xref>] . Arguybly endozoochory provides seeds with longer dispersal distances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref8">8</xref>] , which is an important feature in arid and semiarid lands. Plant that use endozoochory as a dispersion strategy normally produce fleshy fruits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref9">9</xref>] with hard coated seeds which requires a chemmichal or physical treatment to germinate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref7">7</xref>] , it has be considered to prevent embryo damage in the digestive tract of animals. These fruits are normally consumed by birds or large herhervibores (horses or caws) who eat the fruit without actually chewing the seeds.</p><p>In general, species in the Carnivora mammalian order have anatomical structures specialized in consuming animal tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref10">10</xref>] , particularly the carnassials teeth. However, some include fruits and seeds as regular diet components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref15">15</xref>] . For this reason, some carnivorous are potential seed dispersers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>To be considered successfully dispersed, seeds must pass through the digestive system without being damaged and be deposited at a safe site far from the mother plant to reduce intraspecific competition and predation risk. Also, seeds must be deposited in conditions where it can germinate and establish such as good soil quality (not too hard or too soft and adecuate water suply [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref6">6</xref>] ). However, there are different factors that influence the germination process; for example: carnivorous treatment in mouth and gut, herbivory, pathogens, competition and physological seed requirements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Although seed dispersal by mammals is a very important topic in plant ecology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref18">18</xref>] , dispersal by non-frugivouros mammals have not received much attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref19">19</xref>] . Most of studies on seed loss by predation are focused on predispersal predation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref20">20</xref>] . In Mexico, a few studies evaluated carnivorous as seed dispersers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref21">21</xref>] . Some of them were conducted at the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan Biosphere Reserve (TCBR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref22">22</xref>] near to our working site.</p><p>Citharexylum tetramerum and Ziziphus pedunculata are endemic species from BRTC. Citharexylum tetramerum (Verbenaceae) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) is a shrub: three meters high, with simple lanceolate or obovate leaves, flowers are axillary and white; fruits are green berries that change to black at maturity. On the other hand, Ziziphus pedunculata (Rhamneaceae) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) is a shrub approximately five meters high. Its leaves are simple, most of them opposed, and their form could be obovate to oblong; flowers are aggregated and green; fruits are axillary, and shapes are oblong to orbicular and ginger color. It is considered as endargred by IUCN, Other names for this plant Sarcomphalus pedunculatos and Condalia penduculata are considered sinonimous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>We selected Citharexylum tetramerum and Ziziphus pedunculata because they are abundant in the southwest area of the TCBR. Also they are among the most abundant in mid-size carnivore feces like “coyotes” (Canis latrans), ring-tailed “cats” (Basariscus astutus), and gray “foxes” (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and some others.</p><p>For this reason, we assessed the germination of seeds of Citharexylum tetramerum and Ziziphus pedunculata ingested by carnivores obtained from feces and compared them with seeds from fruits.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Santo Tomas Otlaltepec (18˚17'22&quot;N and 97˚45'37.8&quot;W) is a small village in Atexcal county, of Puebla State, in Mexico. Otlaltepecs weather is tempered semiarid BS<sub>1</sub>hw according to K&#246;ppen and modified by Garc&#237;a [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref24">24</xref>] with a temperature range between 14˚C to 22˚C, and the rainfall season is from May through</p><p>October [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref25">25</xref>] . The dominant plant community is xerophilous scrubland with columnar cacti, characterized by Acacia farnesiana, A. cochliacantha and Prosopis laevigata, associated with Haematoxylon brasiletto, Caesalpinia melanadenia, Mimosa sp, Karwinskia mollis, Castela erecta and Bursera sp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sample Collection and Preparation</title><p>We collected scats from Canis latrans (coyote), Bassariscus astutus (ringtail), and Urocyon cinereoargenteus (gray fox) along six one-kilometer-long pre-designated trails from February 2018 to January 2019. Trails were cleaned for scats one month before start the study. We identified feces at the species level according to morphological characteristics such as color, composition, shape, length, width, and deposition sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref27">27</xref>] . We removed seeds from scats and collected ripe fruits; also, we identified seeds to a species level with a photographic plants guide (TCBR 2010) and helped from local people.</p><p>In the laboratory, we assessed a study to compare the germination process of seeds from scats and fruits. We disinfected seeds with a 10% chlorine solution for 15 minutes and 70% ethyl alcohol for five minutes and rinsed with distilled water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref28">28</xref>] . We placed Z. pedunculata seeds (n = 300, as a control 100, from C. latrans, 100 and U. cinereargenteus 100) in Petri dishes with 25 seeds in four replicas per carnivorous and control. Nevertheless, C. tetramerum seeds (n = 195 seeds, for control 75, U. cinereargenteus 90, B. astutus 30) were placed in, at least, 15 seeds per Petri dish with three to six replicates, depending on the availability of ingested seeds per carnivorous species. Petri dishes were placed in a growth chamber (EscLab-Line Instruments mod seat) at a constant temperature of 25˚C and a 12 hour photoperiod. Germination tests lasted 42 days, starting with the first record of germinated seeds. We considered a germinated seed at the radicle appearance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref29">29</xref>] . At the end of germination tests, we selected seeds that did not germinated, and applied them a tetrazolium test to determine viability percentage—Data analysis—We used cumulative germination percentage and germination rate (germination speed per unit time) V = ∑ n i t , where ni is the number of germinated seeds, and t is the number of days since the first germinated seed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>We used the Kruskall-Wallis and multicompartions Dunn’s Dunn test to compare percentage and germination rate because our data did not keep normality distribution. In Dunn’s Test, multiple comparisons medians are significantly different if Z-value &gt; 1.9600. We used chi-square to compare the viability percentage of seeds that did not germinate during germination tests. All yanalyses were run in NCSS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref31">31</xref>] Statistical Software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>We collected 193 scats during a year, 45 of Canis latrans, 104 of Urocyon cinereargenteus, and 44 of Bassariscus astutus. From those scats, organized from April to May 2018, we obtained 30 C. tetramerum seeds from ringtail scats and 108 from gray fox feces. From October 2018 to January 2019, we got 296 Ziziphus pedunculata seeds from coyote and gray fox feces. Furthermore, we got seeds directly from both species’ parental plants simultaneously from scats.</p><p>C. tetramerum control seeds germinated 32 days after being sown; the germination percentage of the control group was constantly increasing, and most of the time, it was higher than the germination percentage of defecated seeds. Furthermore, the average control germination rate was higher than carnivorous’s ingested seeds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). We identified significant differences in germination percentage e (df = 2, H = 20.3845, p = 0.00004) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and germination rate (df = 2, H = 44.6099, p &gt; 0.0001), germination percentage and rate of the control group was significant (Z = 3.2073) higher than those from the defecated ones by gray fox and ringtail. The viability percentage of seeds that did not germinate was higher in control seeds (60.47%) than in seeds ingested by a gray fox (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Still, we could not identify significant differences between the control group and seeds from scats (χ<sup>2</sup> &gt; 2.117, p &gt; 0.0647).</p><p>Ziziphus pedunculata seeds defecated by coyote germinated eight days after they were sown; in contrast, ingested seeds by gray fox started germination 18 days after. Nevertheless, in the same laboratory conditions, the control group did not germinate during tests (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). We detected differences in germination percentage (df = 2, H = 60.1948, p &gt; 0.0001) and in germination rate (df = 2, H = 62.6094, p &gt; 0.0001), germination percentage and rate of seeds from carnivorous were different and higher than control seeds (Z &gt; 3.2259). The viability percentage of non-germinated seeds was at least 45%; also, we found that 90% of control seeds were not dead, so they were dormant seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), therefore we could not identify significant differences in viability percentage between three treatments (χ<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.2850, p &gt; 0.0643).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Kruskall-Wallis One-Way Test (H) and Dunn’s Test multi multiple comparison. CT = Control, GF = Gray Fox, RT = Ringtail, CY = Coyote. Suppose Z-value &gt; 1.96 medians are significantly different</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Kruskall-Wallis One-Way</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dunn’s Test (Multi-Comparison)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vegetal Species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Probabiity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Comparison</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z-Value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Germination Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >C. tetramerum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >25.9974</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CT VS GF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2102</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray fox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GF VS RT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8377</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ringtail</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RT VS CT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5089</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Z. pedunculata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >60.1948</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CT VS CY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8651</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray fox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CY VS GF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5352</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coyote</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GF VS CT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3298</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Germiination Rate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >C. tetramerum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09523</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >44.4215</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CT VS GF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4563</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray fox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GF VS RT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2832</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ringtail</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RT VS CT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0791</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Z. peduncuiata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >68.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CT VS CY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1797</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray fox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CY VS GF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coyote</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GF VS CT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1785</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Viability percentage of seeds that did not germinate during germination tests</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Vegetal Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray Fox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ringtail</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coyote</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. tetramerum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.7 (26/44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.21 (33/73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 (9/10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No tested</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Z. pedunculata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 (90/100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.8 (77/93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No tested</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.31 (72/78)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Statistical analysis of using krusall-Wallis test and Dun’s test to caompare individual differences between speciesis is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. In this table table is very clear that C. tetramerun germinates most from control, and there was no germination from seeds extracted from Gray fox or ringtail feces (p &lt; 0.01). Opposite results came in the case of Z. pendunculata where seeds obtained from coyote and gray fox feces were the only one to germinate.</p><p>Finally, we can disregard the possibility that seeds were unviable because, in most cases, over 45% of non-germinated embryos were alive, as shown by the tetrazolium test (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>C. tetramerum and Z. pedunculata are shrubs; both species are endemic to Puebla and Oaxaca State. C. tetramerum is endemic to a small area between the border of Puebla and Oaxaca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref23">23</xref>] . For this reason, necessary dispersal seed studies are critical because there are data no for both species.</p><p>There were significant differences in germination between C. tetramerum seeds consumed by the carnivorous and the control group. In other species of Citharexylum, we found that seeds remain viable for an extended period, and a mechanic scarification was necessary to increase germination percentage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref32">32</xref>] . Although, for our research, this increase in germination percentage did not occur after gut passage by carnivorous. In another study Soltani, et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref33">33</xref>] found that germination percentage could decrease in -non-dormant seeds as compared to seeds that did not go through gut passage; also, the seed size of this plant could be a factor that caused some damage to seeds and directly affected germination since larger seeds have a better chance to be damaged by the disperser’s tooth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref34">34</xref>] . On the other hand larger seeds take a longer time to on germinate than smaller seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref35">35</xref>] .</p><p>Ziziphus pedunculata seeds ingested by carnivorous presented a higher germination percentage and rate than control seeds. The null germination of control seeds was reported in Z. amole seeds collected in Zapotitlan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref22">22</xref>] . Furthermore, Z., mistol seeds need physical and chemical scarification treatments to break dormancy imposed by the woody testa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref36">36</xref>] . In our study, scarification of Z. pedunculata seeds was provided by carnivores, which helped to break dormancy.</p><p>From our results, we consider that those carnivorous are interacting with plants as legitimate seed dispersers because they keep the viability of seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref37">37</xref>] . Seeds ingested by carnivorous travel distances between one to three kilometers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref13">13</xref>] . The longer the dispersion distance, the lesser the intraspecific competition for the seed and seedling, because of the reduction of dense dependent mortality that exists close to parental plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127823-ref38">38</xref>] . However, we do not know what happened with seeds after they were removed by carnivorous, and how many seeds survived to subsequent stages.</p><p>We could not find germination data of this species that could allow us to compare the effect of carnivores and not carnivorous animals (eg. birds) or more known dispersers such as Coati (Nasua narica).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>In summary, C. tetramerum and Z. pedunculata seeds ingested by carnivorous coyotes, gray foxes, and ringtails maintain seed viability and can be considered as legitime dispersers. In the case of Z. penduculata, gut passage by carnivores broke seeds dormancy. Nevertheless, we do not know what happened with seeds after those animals removed them and if other dispersers contributed to “seeds” dispersal or if there are secondary dispersers of those plants. In future research, it could be essential to identify other vertebrates as birds or other mammals, that consume fruits from those plants and, if possible, follow seeds after they have been removed. Those points could give a better understanding of endemic plants and ecosystems of TCBR</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Mr. Constancio Amador and all his family for their help in field work, as well as the authority people of Santo Tomas Otlaltepec, also to Alejandra L&#243;pez Ramos for her help and to an anonymous reviewer for very important comments.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Adri&#225;n, G.-P., Armella, M.A., de Lourdes Y&#225;&#241;ez-L&#243;pez, M., de Lourdes Martinez-C&#225;rdenas, M. and Zavala-Hurtado, J.A. (2023) Seed Dispersal of Citharexylum tetramerum and Ziziphus penduculata by Carnivorous in a Xerophilous Scrub at Tehuacan, Puebla, Mexico. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 14, 977-987. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2023.149066</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127823-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howe, H.F. and Smallwood, J. (1982) Ecology of Seed Dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 201-228.  
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Grime, J. and Hilier, S. (1992) The Contributions of Seedling Generation to the Tructure and Dynamic of Plant Communities. In: Fenner, M., Ed., The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 522-525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Jordano, P. and Godoy, J. (2002) Frugivore-Generated Seed Shadow: A Landscape View of Demographic and Genetic Effects. In: Levey, D., Silva, W. and Galletu, M., Eds., Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 305-321.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Duncan, R. and Chapman, C. (2002) Limitations of Animal Seed Dispersal for Enhancing Forest Succession on Degraded Lands. In: Levey, D.J., Silva, W.R. and Galleti, M., Eds., The Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 437-450.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Traveset, A., Robertson, A. and Rodríguez-Pérez, J. (2007) A Review on the Role of Endozoochoru in Seed Germination. In: Dennis, A., Green, R. and Schupp, E., Eds., Seed Dispersal: Theory and Its Application in a Changing World, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 78-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schupp, E.W., Jordano, P. and Gómez, J.M. (2010) Seed Dispersal Effectiveness Revisted: A Conceptual Review. New Phytologist, 188, 333-353.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03402.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van der Pijl, L. (1972) Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants. Springer-Verlang, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96108-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steele, M.A. (2021) Oak Seed Dispersal a Study on Plant Animal Interactions. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.81088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rehling, F., Jongejans, E., Schlautmann, J., Albrecht, J., Fassbender, H., Jaroszewicz, B., Matthies, D., Waldschmidt, L., Farwig, N. and Schabo, D.G. (2023) Common Seed Dispersers Contribute Most to the Persistence of a Fleshy-Fruited Tree. Communications Biology, 6, Article No. 330.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04647-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawlor, T. (1979) Handbook to the Orders and Families of Living Mammals. Mad River Press, Virginia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nava, V., Tejero, J. and Chávez, C.B. (1999) Hábitos alimentarios del cacomixtle Basariscus astutus (Carnívora: Procyonidae) en un matorral xerófilo de Hidalgo, México. Anales del Instituto de Biología serie de Zoología, 70, 51-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harrison, R.L. (2012) Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) Ecology and Behavior in Central New Mexico. Western North Naturalist, 72, 495-506.  
https://doi.org/10.3398/064.072.0407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">González-Varo, J.P., Fedriani, J.M., López-Bao, J.V., Guitán, J. and Suárez-Esteban, A. (2015) Frugivoria y dispersión de semillas por mamíferos carnívoros: Rasgos funcionales. Ecosistemas, 24, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2015.24-3.07</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martínez-Vázquez, J., González-Monroy, R. and Díaz-Díaz, D. (2010) Hábitos alimentarios del coyote en el parque nacional Pico de Orizaba. Therya, 1, 145-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Villalobos-Escalante, A., Buenrostro-Silva, A. and Sánchez-de la Vega, G. (2014) Dieta de la zorra gris Urocyon cinereargenteus y su contribución a la dispersión de semillas en la costa de Oaxaca, México. Therya, 5, 355-363.  
https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-14-143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roehm, K. and Moran, M.D. (2013) Is the Coyote (Canis latrans) a Potential Seed Disperser for the American Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)? The American Midland Naturalist, 169, 416-421. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-169.2.416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Viteri-Pasch, M. and Mármol-Kattán, A. (2019) Dieta de la zorra gris (Urocyon cinereargenteus) y su posible importancia en la dispersión de semillas de ciprés (Juniperus comitana) en Huehuetenango, Guatemala. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología Nueva época, 9, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.22201/ie.20074484e.2019.1.1.270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levy, D.J., Silva, W.M. and Galetti, M. (2002) Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation: Third International Symposium-Workshop on Frugivores and Seed Dispersal, S&amp;#227;o Pedro, Brazil, 6-11 August 2000. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995250.0000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hulme, P.E. and Kollmann, J. (2005) Seed Predator Guilds, Spatial Variation in Post-Dispersal Seed Predation and Potential Effects on Plant Demography: A Temperate Perspective. In: Forget, P.M., Lambert, J.E. and Hulme, P.E., Eds., Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998060.0009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DeSoto, L., Tutor, D., Torices, R., Rodríguez-Echeverría, S. and Nabais, C. (2016) Pre-Dispersal Predation Effect on Seed Packaging Strategies and Seed Viability. Oecologia, 108, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3446-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Monrroy, O., Ortega, M. and Velazquez, A. (2003) Dieta y abundancia relativa del coyote: Un dispersor potencial de semillas. In: Velázquez, A., Torres, A. and Bocco, G., Eds., Las ense&amp;#241;anzas de San Juan, Instituto Nacional de Ecología—SEMARNAT, México Ditrito Federal, 565-591.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zarco-Mendoza, P., Ríos-Casanova, L. and Godínez-álvarez, H. (2018) Dispersal and Germination of Seeds Ingested by Carnivores in the Zapotitlan de las Salinas Valley, Mexico. Polibotánica, 46, 139-147.  
https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.46.7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weller, S. (2010) Plantas de la Reserva de la Biósfera Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Volumen I: Especies de Puebla. Peace Corpos United States Agency International Development.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García, E. (2004) Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Koppen. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INEGI: Instituto Nacional Estadística y geografía (2009) Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografía, Atexcal, Puebla.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CONANP: Comisión Nacional áreas Naturales Protegidas (2013) Programa de manejo de Reserva de la Biósfera Tehuacán-Cuicatlán. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Ciudad de Mexico.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aranda Sánchez, J. (2012) Manual para el rastreo de mamíferos silvestres de México. Comisión Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de Biodiversidad, Ciudad de México, Mexico. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.113211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martínez-Cárdenas, M.L., Cabrera-Jiménez, M.C., Carmona, A. and Varela-Hernández, G.J. (2006) Promoción de la germinación de semillas Stenocereus griseus (Haworth) Buxbaun y Escontria chiotilla (Weber) Rose. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas, 51, 111-121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernández, G. and Jhonston, M. (1986) Fisiología Vegetal. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA), San José Costa Rica.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maguire, J.D. (1962) Speed of Germination Aid in Selection and Evaluation for Seedling Emergence and Vigor. Crop Science, 2, 176-177.  
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020033x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NCSS 2019 Statistical Software (2019) NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA.  
https://www.ncss.com/software/ncss/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez-Suárez, B. (2011) Observaciones sobre la germinación de tres especies del género Citharexylum empleadas en restauración ecológica. Colombia Forestal, 14, 137-143. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2011.2.a02</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soltani, E., Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M., Heshmati, S. and Mirfazeli, M.S. (2018) A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Frugivory (Endozoochory) on Seed Germination: Role of Seed Size and Kind of Dormancy. Plant Ecology, 219, 1283-1294.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0878-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuiters, A.T. and Huiskes, H.P.J. (2010) Potential of Endozoochorous Seed Dispersal by Sheep in Calcareous Grasslands: Correlation with Seed Traits. Applied Vegetation Science, 13, 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01058.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murali, K.S. (1997) Patterns of Seed Size, Germination and Seed Viability of Tropical Tree Species in Southern India. Biotropica, 29, 271-279.  
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2389142  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00428.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Araoz, S. and Dellongo, O. (2006) Tratamientos Pregerminativos Para romper la dormición física impuesta por el endocarpo en Ziziphus mistol Greisebach. Quebracho-Revista de Ciencias Forestales, 13, 56-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herrera, C. (1989) Frugivory and Seed Dispersal by Carnivorous Mammals, and Associated Fruit Characteristics, in Undisturbed Mediterranean Habitats. Oikos, 55, 250-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565429</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127823-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murray, D. (1986) Seed Dispersal. Academic Press Australia, Queensland.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-511900-9.50007-3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>