<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2023.139126</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-127595</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Endometrial Cancer: Epidemiological, Histological and Therapeutic Aspects in the Gynecology-Obstetrics Department of the Donka National Hospital, CHU of Conakry
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdourahamane</surname><given-names>Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ousmane</surname><given-names>Balde</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aboubacar</surname><given-names>M’mah Sylla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ibrahima</surname><given-names>Conte</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aboubacar</surname><given-names>Fodé Momo Soumah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Namory</surname><given-names>Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique de l’H&amp;amp;#244;pital National Donka du CHU, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique de l’H&amp;amp;#244;pital National Ignace Deen du CHU, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de la Santé de l’Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1507</fpage><lpage>1515</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective:
   To study the epidemiological, histological and therapeutic characteristics of endometrial cancer in the Gynecology-Obstetrics department of the Donka National Hospital, CHU of Conakry. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of 86 patients with endometrial cancer treated in the Gynecology-Obstetrics department of the Donka National Hospital from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, based on their medical records. We analysed the epidemiological, histological and therapeutic aspects of the disease. <b>Results:</b> Endometrial cancer accounted for 3.1% of the 2793 gynecological pathology cases registered in the department during the study period, ranking third. The mean age of the patients was 63 &#177;
   
  5 years. Most of them were uneducated (59.3%), postmenopausal (91.9%), nulliparous (30.2%), obese (65.1%) and hypertensive (77.1%). More than half of the patients (53.4%) were diagnosed at stage I. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was the predominant histological type (68.6%). Surgery was performed in 96.6% of the patients, and chemotherapy in 14.0%. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, 84.5% of the patients were alive. <b>Conclusion:</b> Endometrial cancer is a common gynecological malignancy in our department. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma is the most frequent histological subtype. Surgery is the main treatment modality.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cancer</kwd><kwd> Endometrium</kwd><kwd> Donka</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Endometrial cancer is the second most frequent gynecological cancer after breast cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref1">1</xref>] . It affects about 4.4% of women globally, with an estimated 382,100 new cases in 2018 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref2">2</xref>] . In France, it causes about 1200 deaths per year, with about 6500 new cases annually [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref3">3</xref>] . It represents about 8% of cancers in women and is the fifth most common cancer after breast, colon-rectum and lung cancers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref3">3</xref>] . In Canada, endometrial cancer’s incidence and mortality rate were 35.7 and 5.3 per 100,000 women respectively, in 2017 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref4">4</xref>] . In Cameroon, it ranked third among gynecological cancers in 2015, with 176 cases and a frequency of 6.88%, mainly in postmenopausal women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref5">5</xref>] . In Burkina Faso, it accounted for 0.87% of all cancers and 2.7% of gynaecological and breast cancers in 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>This disease’s high frequency and mortality and the lack of recent data on its characteristics in our department prompted us to conduct this study. The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiological, histological and therapeutic aspects of endometrial cancer in our department.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>This retrospective descriptive study was conducted over an 11-year period, spanning from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. The study aimed to investigate various aspects of endometrial cancer in patients treated in our department.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Population and Inclusion Criteria</title><p>The study population consisted of patients who had been treated for endometrial cancer in our department during the specified 11-year timeframe. Inclusion criteria for patient records were based on two key factors: completeness of the medical records and the presence of a histological report confirming the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Patients with incomplete records or needing a histological report were excluded from the study to ensure data accuracy and reliability.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection</title><p>All patient records that met the inclusion criteria were collected and reviewed for the study. The data collection process focused on gathering comprehensive information related to the epidemiological, histological, and therapeutic aspects of endometrial cancer. The data were extracted from the patients’ medical records, including demographic details, clinical presentations, histological findings, and treatment approaches.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 software. For qualitative variables, proportions were calculated to express the distribution of different categorical variables. For quantitative variables, descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and extreme values were computed to provide a comprehensive summary of numerical data.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Ethical Considerations</title><p>Prior to initiating the study, we obtained ethical clearance and the necessary authorisation from the head of our department. The study adhered strictly to ethical principles, ensuring patient anonymity and maintaining the confidentiality of all individual data. Patient identifiers were removed during data analysis and reporting to protect their privacy and comply with ethical guidelines.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Among the 2793 files of gynecological pathologies identified in the department during the study period, we recorded 86 cases of endometrial cancer, representing a frequency of 3.1% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Epidemiological Aspect</title><p>Frequency:</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows that endometrial cancer ranked 3rd behind cervical cancer and breast cancer.</p><p>We note on this curve two declines in 2015 and 2020 and a peak in 2021 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The average age of the patients was 63 &#177; 5 years with extremes of 40 and 86 years and a higher proportion (54.7%) between 60 and 69 years. These were mainly patients with no schooling (59.3), widows (47.7%), postmenopausal (91.9%), Nulliparous (30.2%), housewives (65.1%), obese (65.1%) and hypertensive (77.1%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>More than 5 patients out of 10 (53.4%) were treated at stage I of the disease,</p><p>followed by stage II (27.9%), stage III (15.1%) and stage IV (3.5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Histological Appearance</title><p>Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was by far the most frequently encountered histological type (68.6%), followed by serous carcinoma (15.1%) versus 1.2% papillae carcinoma (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Therapeutic Aspect</title><p>Surgical treatment was performed in 83 patients (96.6%). Among the operated patients, 6 patients (7.2%) with FIGO stage IA, type I, Grade 1 or 2, underwent total hysterectomy plus bilateral adnexectomy. Forty patients (48.2%) who were at stage IA or IB, type 1, Grade 3 and type 2 underwent total hysterectomy plus bilateral adnexectomy and pelvic and lumbo-aortic lymphadenectomy. Thirty-seven patients (44.6%) presenting with stage II or III, all types and all grades, underwent total hysterectomy or colpohysterectomy (in the event of invasion of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of endometrial cancer cases by socio-demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sociodemographic characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentages (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average: 63 &#177; 5 years Extreme: 40 and 86 years</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not in school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Superior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brides</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >widows</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Singles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Menopause</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulliparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peaucipares</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewives</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Officials</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >liberal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obesity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High blood pressure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diabetes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of endometrial cancer cases by FIGO stage</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FIGO Stage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Stage I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stage Ia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stage Ib</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Stage II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Stage III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Stage IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of endometrial cancer cases according to histological type of tumour</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Histology result</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endometrioid adenocarcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serous carcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clear cell carcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mucinous carcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Papilloid carcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of the 59 cases of adenocarcinoma according to the grade of differentiation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Endometrioid adenocarcinoma differentiation grade</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade 1 (well-differentiated tumor)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade 2 (Poorly differentiated tumor)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade 3 (Undifferentiated tumor)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the cervix) plus bilateral annexectomy with omentectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and lumbo-aortic. Three patients benefited from chemotherapy alone, either 7.0% and three others received chemotherapy after surgery, either 7%. As radiotherapy and brachytherapy are carried out outside Guinea, data relating to these treatments were not available. The postoperative course was simple in 65 patients (78.3%), complicated by infection in 16 patients (19.3%) and hemorrhage in 2 patients (2.4%). Three cases of death (3.5%) were recorded, all before the intervention and related to the advanced stage of the disease (stage IV). Post-treatment monitoring of patients was based on the clinical examination of patients carried out every 6 months. After an average follow-up of 15 months, 70 patients were alive (84.5%) among which 7 patients presented a local recurrence, 3 a locoregional recurrence and 3 others metastases. Eleven patients died (13.3%) and 2 patients lost sight of (2.4%).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Endometrial cancer is the third most common gynaecological cancer in our department after cervical cancer and breast cancer, with a frequency of 3.1%. This frequency is lower than that reported by Engbang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref5">5</xref>] in Cameroon, who found that endometrial cancer represented 6.88% of gynaecological cancers. However, it is higher than those reported by Ou&#233;draogo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref6">6</xref>] in Burkina- Faso and Dem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref7">7</xref>] in Dakar, which were 2.7% and 2.0% of gynaecological and breast cancers, respectively. Several authors have reported that endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref10">10</xref>] . The frequency of endometrial cancer in our department has changed over time, with a decrease in the number of cases in 2015 and 2020 and a peak in 2021.</p><p>The mean age of the patients was 63 years old, ranging from 40 to 86 years old. The mean age found in this study is higher than those reported by Chekman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref10">10</xref>] in Algeria, Ou&#233;draogo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref6">6</xref>] in Burkina-Faso and Engbang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref5">5</xref>] in Cameroon, which was 58.54 years, 56.7 years and 54.43 years respectively. The most affected age group was 60 - 69 years old, with a frequency of 54.7%. Engbang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref5">5</xref>] and Ou&#233;draogo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref6">6</xref>] found higher frequencies for the age groups of 50 - 59 years and 51 - 60 years, respectively. Most of the patients were postmenopausal (91.9%). This result confirms that endometrial cancer is mainly a pathology of postmenopausal women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref12">12</xref>] . The same observation was made by Ou&#233;draogo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref6">6</xref>] , who found a proportion of 89.5% of postmenopausal patients in their study. Most of the patients were obese (65.1%), hypertensive (77.1%) and nulliparous (30.2%). According to Sobel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref4">4</xref>] , obesity is a risk factor for endometrial cancer, and each increase of 10 units in body mass index increases the relative risk of endometrial cancer by 2.89. Jerome et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref11">11</xref>] and Lansac [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref3">3</xref>] also reported that overweight is the first etiological factor due to hyperestrogenism, which is determines by promoting the aromatisation of androgens into estrogens in peripheral fats.</p><p>More than half of the patients (53.4%) were diagnosed with stage I of the disease. This result is consistent with those of Chekman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref10">10</xref>] and Scattarelli et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref12">12</xref>] , who reported 62.7% and 46% of patients with stage I endometrial cancer, respectively. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type in our study (68.6%). The same observation was made by Ou&#233;draogo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref6">6</xref>] , Engbang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref5">5</xref>] and Chekmal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref10">10</xref>] , who reported 67.0%, 68.2% and 84.0% of endometrioid adenocarcinoma respectively. Among the non-endometrioid types, serous carcinoma was the most common with 15.1%. Scattarelli et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref12">12</xref>] , on the other hand, reported higher frequencies of carcinosarcoma and serous or seropapillary carcinoma, with respective frequencies of 45.9% and 39.2%. Surgery was the main treatment performed (96.6%). The surgical procedure performed depended on the stage of the disease, ranging from total hysterectomy plus bilateral adnexectomy for stage I to colpohysterectomy plus adnexectomy and lymph node dissection beyond stage I. This attitude is in accordance with the clinical guidelines of the Canadian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics that surgery could be limited to hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as an acceptable alternative in patients with stage I disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref13">13</xref>] . Leary et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref14">14</xref>] concluded that total hysterectomy and removal of the adnexa constitute the standard treatment for stage I endometrial cancer. According to Sobel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref4">4</xref>] , for stage I, chemotherapy was rarely used, either pre- or post-operatively, in our study. According to Lheureux et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref15">15</xref>] , adjuvant chemotherapy can give promising results after surgery.</p><p>After a mean follow-up of 15 months, 84.5% of operated patients were alive. Chekman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref10">10</xref>] reported a 5-year overall survival that could vary from 92% to 42% for stage I depending on the histological characteristics of the tumor. For Jerome et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127595-ref11">11</xref>] , the 5-year survival rate for all stages combined, is estimated at 75%.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Endometrial cancer ranks third among gynaecological cancers in our department. It mainly affects postmenopausal women over 60 who are nulliparous, obese and hypertensive. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma is the most common histological subtype. Most of the patients are diagnosed at stage I. Surgery is the main treatment modality; most patients are alive after a mean follow-up of 15 months. Early detection and management of this disease could improve the prognosis.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diallo, A., Balde, O., Sylla, A.M., Conte, I., Soumah, A.F.M. and Keita, N. (2023) Endometrial Cancer: Epidemiological, Histological and Thera- peutic Aspects in the Gynecology-Obstetrics Department of the Donka National Hospital, CHU of Conakry. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13, 1507-1515. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2023.139126</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127595-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deluche, E., Marti, C., Jochum, F., Bendifallah, S., Aza&amp;#239;s, H., Deidier, J., et al. (2023) Application in France of the 2021 European Recommendations on Endometrial Cancer. Bulletin du Cancer (Paris), 110, 55-68.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.11.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Mathers, C., Parkin, D.M., Pi&amp;#241;eros, M., et al. (2019) Estimating the Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN Sources and Methods. International Journal of Cancer, 144, 1941-1953.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lansac, J., Lecomte, P. and Marret, H. (2007) Gynecology for the Practitioner. 8th Edition, Masson, Paris, 581 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sobel, M., Simpson, A.N. and Ferguson, S.E. (2021) Endometrial Cancer. CMAJ, 193, E1750-E1751. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202731-f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Engbang, N.J.P., Essome, H., Tchente, N.C., Essam, S.J.D., Elono, F.A.M., Ateba, G.R., et al. (2015) Endometrial Cancer in Cameroon: Histo-Epidemiological Profile of 176 Cases. Journal Africain du Cancer, 7, 218-222.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-015-0407-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouédraogo, A.S., Sanou-Lamien, A.M., Ouédraogo-Tiendrébéogo, R., Ramde, N., et al. (2011) Histoepidemiological Aspects of Endometrial Cancer in Ouagadougou. Journal Africain du Cancer, 3, 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-011-0191-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dem, A., Traoré, B., Dieng, M., Diop, P., Ouajdi, T., Lalami, M., et al. (2008) Gynecological and Breast Cancers at the Cancer Institute of Dakar. Sante, 18, 25-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burke, W.M., Orr, J., Leitao, M., Salom, E., Gehrig, P., Olawaiye, A.B., et al. (2014) Endometrial Cancer: A Review and Current Management Strategies: Part II. Gynecologic Oncology, 134, 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arend, R.C., Jones, B.A., Martinez, A. and Goodfellow, P. (2018) Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Markers and Management of Advanced Stage Disease. Gynecologic Oncology, 150, 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chekman, C., Gouarek, F., Bouyid, A., Akbal, K. and Bentabak, K. (2020) Endometrial Cancer. Algerian Medical Journal, 32, 203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexandre, J., Le frere-Belda, M.A., Prulhiere, K., Treilleux, I. and Leary, A. (2020) Nice-Saint-Paul de Vence 2020 Recommendations for Clinical Practice: Management of Metastatic and/or Relapsing Endometrial Cancer. Bulletin du Cancer (Paris), 107, 1006-1018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scattarelli, A., Poteau, A., Aziz, M., Lae, M., Courville, P., Arnaud, M., et al. (2020) Evaluation of Non-Endometrial Endometrial Cancer Guidelines: A Retrospective Multicentre Study. Taurus &amp; Cancer 107, 122-132.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giede, C., Tien Le, S. and Power, P. (2013) Role of Surgery in Endometrial Cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 35, 370-371.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30966-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leary, A. and Abu-Rustum, N. (2016) Endometrial Cancer. The Lancet, 387, 1094-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127595-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lheureux, S. and Joly, F. (2012) Endometrial Cancer: Place for Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Taurus &amp; Cancer, 99, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1684/bdc.2011.1518</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>