<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2023.119003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-127555</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  RAPD Markers and Genetic Information Entropy in Environmental Monitoring: A Case Study with Wild Mushrooms
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Charoula</surname><given-names>Psallida</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dimitrios</surname><given-names>Argyropoulos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Genetic Identification Laboratory, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, Athens, Greece</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Mushrooms have a remarkable scientific value due to their nutritional, medicinal properties and industrial applications in enzyme production, so that effort in 
  the 
  maintenance of native wild mushroom varieties is increasing. The present study focuses on the use of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for biodiversity measure of wild mushroom species of the Northwest mountainous region of Greece. Data mining of similarity matrices from RAPD analysis w
  as
   used to extract measurable entropy parameters for mushroom biodiversity monitoring based on Shannon’s information entropy. Shannon information index provides an easy assessment o
  f
   the entropy of the genetic information of the germplasm per mushroom species while the total equitability index (E<sub>H</sub>) = 0.871 offers an overall estimation of the genetic variation evenness of all species in the population of the studied mushrooms. 
  Application of RAPDs with parallel entropy analysis is an easily applicable 
  and low-cost valuable technology in environmental monitoring, using genetic information of wild mushroom species as an indicator that can lead to future actions in biodiversity maintenance and germplasm protection. The provided methodology can serve as a pilot procedure enriched with other environmental factors to monitor and protect wild mushroom communities native 
  to
   the Greek countryside or in any part of the world and provide comparable results about biodiversity from different regions using common entropy indices.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA</kwd><kwd> Shannon’s Index</kwd><kwd> Entropy</kwd><kwd> Biodiversity</kwd><kwd> Dendrogram</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Μushrooms have a great scientific value due to their nutritional, medicinal properties and industrial applications in enzyme production. Their protein content is less than in animals but more compared to plants, while they are low in fat and high in fiber  (P&#233;rez-Montes et al., 2021) . The use of medicinal mushrooms in Western countries has increased in the last decades, while in Asian countries, there is a long tradition for therapeutic applications  (Agarwal &amp; Fulgoni, 2020;   Rauf et al., 2023) .  Singh et al. (2022)  comment that mushrooms provide primary metabolites for energy, while secondary metabolites offer medicinal properties for human wellness that will play a significant role in fighting infectious diseases. Mushrooms’ metabolites are used as immunomodulatory and anticancer agents. Reports show that they exhibit antitumor and antimicrobial activity and are used in immunotherapy through immunonutrition  (Wong et al., 2020;   Zhao et al., 2020) . They are environmentally friendly contributing to bioremediation conferring specific activities in biodegradation, bioremediation and biosorption  (Ganguly et al., 2023;   Hultberg et al., 2020;   Li et al., 2022)  as also in biotechnological applications for energy production with biofuels  (Shan et al., 2023;   Diamantopoulou &amp; Papanikolaou, 2023) .</p><p>Effort in the maintenance of native wild mushroom varieties is increasing, as they can have a significant environmental impact and increased commercial value (food, pharmaceutical, etc.). Newer technologies, following the progress in molecular genetics, have been employed to certify and conserve native wild mushrooms  (Li et al., 2018;   Geng et al., 2022;   Wijayawardene et al., 2023) . Genome analysis methods can ensure the consumer and the producer for uniquely valuable products with a label of origin avoiding the risk of losing important species of mushrooms, native to rural areas. Due to the lack of substantial genetic sequence information in the field of wild mushroom genetics, the present study focuses on the use of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for biodiversity measure of wild mushroom species of the Northwest mountainous region of Greece. The RAPD technology is based on the amplification of DNA with short nucleotide sequences of random order, usually 10 bp long. RAPD markers bind to genomic DNA randomly, resulting in the amplification of DNA pieces with unknown sequences. RAPD marker analysis dates to the nineties, where it was reported that “These polymorphisms, simply detected as DNA segments which amplify from one parent but not the other, are inherited in a Mendelian fashion and can be used to construct genetic maps in a variety of species. We suggest that these polymorphisms be called RAPD markers, after Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA”  (Williams et al., 1990;   Welsh &amp; McClelland, 1990) .  Hadrys et al. (1992)  comment that “Molecular genetic markers have been developed into powerful tools to analyze genetic relationships and genetic diversity and the RAPD technology may be used in molecular ecology to analyze mixed genome samples with (i) suitability for work on anonymous genomes, (ii) applicability to problems where only limited quantities of DNA are available, (iii) efficiency and low expense”. RAPD markers serve to distinguish, characterize and differentiate fungal populations at species level and have proven to be a rapid and reliable tool in the genetic diversity. Seven RAPD primers were used to assess the diversity within and among twelve populations of three mushroom species Ganoderma lucidum, Leucoagaricus sp. and Lentinus sp. from different sampling sites in central India  (Dwivedi et al., 2018) . Similarly, genomic discrimination of eleven commercial mushrooms and establishing phylogenetic relationships using 10 RAPD markers has also been attempted  (Agarwal et al., 2013) . Most of RAPD studies are towards cultivar classification and breeding selection in certain species. RAPD technology was applied to differentiate 11 commercial strains of A. auricula and five commercial strains of A. polytricha and one white-fruitbody mutant strain, and characterize their genetic diversity. Results showed that all the strains tested could be differentiated by pooled RAPD data, and even one individual primer (S10) could also discriminate all tested strains  (Yan et al., 2004) . Using PEG-mediated protoplast fusion, a total of nine pfle somatic hybrids were developed between Pleurotus florida and Lentinula edodes and were assessed for genetic closeness, stability and variance compared to their first parental strains using nine RAPD molecular markers  (Sarkar et al., 2022) .</p><p>Information entropy based on mathematical formulas for entropy  (Shannon, 1948)  has been employed to analyze data from similarity matrices of RAPD genetic markers. Genetic Information Entropy has been extensively reviewed by various authors where the versatility of entropy analytics is presented  (Sherwin, 2010;   Sherwin &amp; Prat i Fornells, 2019) . Applications range from the study of genetic entropy evaluating allele distribution using genetic markers for variety classification and selection in the same species to the study of diversity within and among populations of distant genera in natural environments  (Hao et al., 2023;   Dwivedi et al., 2018;   Zeb et al., 2023;   Patel et al., 2020) . The present study aims at the application of RAPDs as a valuable technology in environmental monitoring using genetic entropy of wild mushroom species that can lead to future actions in biodiversity maintenance and germplasm protection.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Collection</title><p>Ten species of wild mushrooms populations, collected from the North-West mountainous region of Greece, were studied at the Genetic Identification Laboratory of The Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA. The sampled species were: Amanita caesaria, Boletus aereus, Craterellus cornucopiodes, Macrolepiota procera, Agaricus urinascens, Cantharellus cibarius, Hygrophorus marzuolus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Ganoderma lucidum and Morchella esculenta.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. DNA Extraction</title><p>DNA extraction was carried out in duplicates using 100 mg of lyophilized mushrooms from each species using the NucleoSpin&#174; Plant II extraction system (Macherey-Nagel) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The protocol involves first lysis of the cells, purification with organic solvents and extraction of DNA via column chromatography provided in the company’s kit. Quantification of the extracted genetic material was performed by fluorometry on the fluorescent detector Gene-4 (DNA-Technology, Research &amp; Production), suitable for the quantification of genetic material.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. PCR Conditions</title><p>Isolated DNA was analyzed for genetic similarity among samples with PCR using six RAPD primers (ten bases long, decamers) with nucleotide sequence listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. PCRs were performed in a final volume of 25 &#181;l using KAPA2G Robust PCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems) according to protocol of the kit manufacturer. The reaction mixtures were subjected to the following thermal cycling parameters in a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems): 1 cycle of 3 min at 94˚C (denaturation), followed by 45 cycles of 1 min at 94˚C, 1 min at 35˚C and 1 min at 72˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Gel Electrophoresis and Data Analysis</title><p>PCR products of each sample were assayed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel containing GelRed fluorescence dye in 1X TAE buffer at 90 V for 1 hour and photographed in a BIO-PRINT ultraviolet photographic chamber (Vilber-Lurmart). Photos of the RAPD profiles obtained from the electrophoresis of the genetic material were uploaded in PyElph 1.4 bioinformatics software for the grouping of mushrooms and the construction of a genetic similarity dendrogram  (Pavel &amp; Vasile, 2012) .</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Genetic Information Entropy</title><p>Information entropy resulted from RAPDs analysis was estimated by Shannon’s information index:</p><p>H = − ∑ p i ln p i</p><p>where Σ: sum; ln: natural log; p<sub>i</sub>: value refers to the number of unique RAPD bands per species i. The Shannon Equitability Index was calculated using the formula:</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Nucleotide sequences of RAPD primers used in the genetic analysis of wild mushroom species</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD Primers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sequence</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAGGCCCTTC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TGCCGAGCTG</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AGTCAGCCAC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AATCGGGCTG</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AGGGGTCTTG</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RAPD6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GTGATCGCAG</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>E H = H / ln S</p><p>where H: the Shannon information index; S: the total number of unique bands for all studied species.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The overall electrophoresis results of PCR products from ten mushroom species using 6 RAPDs primers are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Electrophoresis photos of PCR products for each one of the six RAPD primers and the ten mushroom species were combined and analyzed simultaneously. Analysis using PyElph 1.4 for the grouping of mushrooms and the construction of a genetic similarity dendrogram is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Based on the genetic information provided from the RAPD analysis, it is noticed that the ten mushroom species are clustered in two major groups with significant genetic distance variation among members of each group as in the case of Craterellus cornucopiodes and Morchella esculenta in the one group and the Cantharellus cibarius in the other group. It has to be strongly stated that the presented RAPD analysis and the corresponding dendrogram are not intended for identification or taxonomic classification of the studied fungi, as they are species of different fungal orders already defined from their collection. The dendrogram is used as a graphic representation for comprehensible visual inspection of genetic similarities among studied fungi for entropic analysis. It was formed using the Neighbor Joining algorithm  (Saitou &amp; Nei, 1987)  that allows unequal rates of evolutionary progress, so that branch lengths are proportional to amount of genetic variation. Additionally, the observed differences in genetic distances are not interpreted at this stage as an evolutionary advantage or disadvantage but indicate the genetic variability among the studied mushrooms. Monitoring the genetic profile of the wild mushrooms in conjunction with their population size can help in maintenance of natural mushrooms resources. Moreover, indication of high genetic variability can lead to selection from certain populations of wild mushrooms already known for their high nutritional value such as Pleurotus sp. and Amanita sp. as a source of new genetic material for improvement of existing commercial mushrooms.</p>Shannon Genetic Diversity Index<p>Beyond commercial utilization of wild mushroom germplasm based on RAPD markers, the certain technology could be used in the design of strategies for monitoring and assessment of ecosystems biodiversity from the unpredicted effect of various environmental factors such as climate change and anthropogenic interference. For this reason, matrix data that were provided from the software PyElph 1.4, were further analyzed based on Shannon information index for entropy to extract quantifiable parameters about the genetic information content of studied mushrooms (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), as also were tested for statistical significance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Shannon genetic information index (Η) per mushroom population and total equitability index (E<sub>H</sub>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mushroom Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Η</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amanita caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.367</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boletus aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.367</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Craterellus cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.186</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macrolepiota procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.315</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agaricus urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.365</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cantharellus cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.343</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hygrophorus marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.367</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pleurotus ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.367</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ganoderma lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morchella esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.365</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shannon Total Population Equitability Index (E<sub>H</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.871</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Anova and pair wise comparisons based on the similarity matrix produced by RAPD marker analysis of ten wild mushroom species</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >ANOVA: Single Factor</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a = 0.05</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DESCRIPTION</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Count</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std Err</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amanita caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.537</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boletus aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.490</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Craterellus cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.791</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macrolepiota procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.581</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.723</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agaricus urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.560</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cantharellus cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.512</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.744</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.653</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hygrophorus marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.537</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pleurotus ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.537</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ganoderma lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.721</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.580</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.862</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morchella esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3261</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.442</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.467</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >df</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eta-sq</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RMSSE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Omega Sq</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Between Groups</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.672</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2E−07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.363</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Within Groups</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.486</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Q TEST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std Err</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >q-stat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean-crit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria,</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.509</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.619</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A caesaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.886</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.556</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.398</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.486</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.695</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. aereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.512</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.835</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.672</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.442</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.974</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cornucopiodes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.486</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.509</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.509</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.463</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.935</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. procera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.295</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.209</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. urinascens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.295</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.619</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.619</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.209</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cibarius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.509</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H. marzuolus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. ostreatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lucidum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. esculenta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.323</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Shannon information index provides an easy assessment on the entropy of the genetic information of the germplasm per mushroom species while the total equitability index (E<sub>H</sub>) = 0.871 offers an overall estimation of the genetic variation evenness of all species in the population of the studied mushrooms. The higher the value of E<sub>H</sub> approaching to 1, the most balanced the observed genetic information among the studied species. The importance of Shannon index is that can reflect genomic drift and if an ecosystem biodiversity will tend to decline. Resampling in time can provide a trend of Shannon index as an indicator for future strategies for environmental protection. In this case, the wild mushrooms germplasm entropy calculated from the RAPDs, could serve as a representation of the overall condition of the ecosystem and it can also be related with other abiotic factors. It has to be noticed that while the Shannon equitability index offers an easily quantifiable measure on the total genetic entropy, information of all the examined mushrooms may mask genetic entropy of individual species. This is observed mainly in the case of Craterellus cornucopiodes where there is differentiation from the rest of the mushrooms as it is noticed from the dendrogram distances and the Shannon index. This is also verified from the ANOVA analysis of the similarity matrix (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) where p-value 2E−07 &lt; 0.05 indicates significant differences in the genetic information, as also from the pairwise significance comparison where Craterellus cornucopiodes differs from all the rest of the studied mushrooms apart from Morchella esculenta.</p><p>While RAPDs have been extensively used in species and genera taxonomic classifications, they have also been subjected to criticism as their PCR replications are not consistent. This is a problem that it is observed when specific RAPD markers are used for taxonomic issues, especially in different labs. In the current study, this limitation is not an issue as the analysis is based on measurable data of the total number of the used RAPD markers with statistical estimation about the entropic character of genomes and not targeting specific bands with certain RAPD markers. Additionally, as the described procedure is of statistical nature, increasing the number of markers will reduce even more variations that are caused by experimental conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In the present study, the application of RAPDs with parallel entropy analysis was examined as an easily applicable and low-cost valuable technology in environmental monitoring, using genetic information of wild mushroom species as an indicator that can lead to future actions in biodiversity maintenance and germplasm protection. The provided methodology can serve as a pilot procedure enriched with other environmental factors to monitor and protect wild mushroom communities native to the Greek countryside or in any part of the world and provide comparable results about biodiversity from different regions using common entropy indices.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Psallida, C., &amp; Argyropoulos, D. (2023). RAPD Markers and Genetic Information Entropy in Environmental Monitoring: A Case Study with Wild Mushrooms. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 11, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.119003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127555-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Agarwal</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Prasad</surname><given-names> M. P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Rindhe</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>. Genomic Discrimination of Eleven Commercial Mushrooms by DNA Fingerprinting Using RAPD Marker</article-title><source> International Research Journal of Biological Sciences</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>5</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agarwal, S., &amp; Fulgoni III, V. (2020). Modeling the Nutritional Impact of Adding Mushrooms to USDA Food Patterns. Current Developments in Nutrition, 4, 501. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa046_001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diamantopoulou, P., &amp; Papanikolaou, S. (2023). Biotechnological Production of Sugar-Alcohols: Focus on Yarrowia lipolytica and Edible/Medicinal Mushrooms. Process Biochemistry, 124, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2022.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dwivedi, S., Singh, S., Chauhan, U. K., &amp; Tiwari, M. K. (2018). Inter and Intraspecific Genetic Diversity (RAPD) among Three Most Frequent Species of Macrofungi (Ganoderma lucidum, Leucoagricus sp. and Lentinus sp.) of Tropical Forest of Central India. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 16, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ganguly</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Dey</surname><given-names> L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Baksi</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2023</year>)<article-title>. Mycoremediation: Role of Mushroom in the Bioremediation of Heavy Metals</article-title><source> Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 6498</fpage>-<lpage>6503</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geng, Y., Zhang, S., Yang, N., &amp; Qin, L. (2022). Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genomics Analysis of the Wild Edible Mushroom (Gomphus purpuraceus) Provide Insights into Its Potential Food Application and Artificial Domestication. Genes (Basel), 13, Article 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091628</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadrys, H., Balick, M., &amp; Schierwater, B. (1992). Applications of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in Molecular Ecology. Molecular Ecology, 1, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1992.tb00155.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hao, R., Yang, L., &amp; Wang, Y. H. (2023). Rhizosphere Soil Fungal Diversity and Soil Physicochemical Properties of Different Vegetations in Tundra of Changbai Mountain. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 11, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.112002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hultberg, M., Ahrens, L., &amp; Golovko, O. (2020). Use of Lignocellulosic Substrate Colonized by Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) for Removal of Organic Micropollutants from Water. Journal of Environmental Management, 272, Article ID: 111087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, H., Chai, L., Cui, J., Zhang, F., Wang, F., &amp; Li, S. (2022). Polypyrrole-Modified Mushroom Residue Activated Carbon for Sulfate and Nitrate Removal from Water: Adsorption Performance and Mechanism. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 49, Article ID: 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102916</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, H., Wu, S., Ma, X. et al. (2018). The Genome Sequences of 90 Mushrooms. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 9982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28303-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patel</surname><given-names> Y.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Prakash</surname><given-names> A. P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Patel</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Vishwakarma</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2020</year>)<article-title>. Pleurotus Species as Source of Nutraceuticals Including Vitamin B12 and Lignocellulosic Degradative Enzyme</article-title><source> Journal of BioScience and Biotechnology</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 33</fpage>-<lpage>46</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pavel, A. B., &amp; Vasile, C. I. (2012). PyElph—A Software Tool for Gel Images Analysis and Phylogenetics. BMC Bioinformatics, 13, Article No. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez-Montes, A., Rangel-Vargas, E., Lorenzo, J. M., Romero, L., &amp; Santos, E. M. (2021). Edible Mushrooms as a Novel Trend in the Development of Healthier Meat Products. Current Opinion in Food Science, 37, 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rauf, A., Joshi, P. B., Ahmad, Z., Hemeg, H. A., Olatunde, A., Naz, S., Hafeez, N., &amp; Simal-Gandara, J. (2023). Edible Mushrooms as Potential Functional Foods in Amelioration of Hypertension. Phytotherapy Research, 37, 2644-2660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7865</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saitou</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Nei</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1987</year>)<article-title>. The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees</article-title><source> Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 406</fpage>-<lpage>425</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarkar, S., Bag, N., &amp; Mallick, P. (2022). Assessment of Genome Stability of pfleFB Hybrid Generations through Molecular DNA Markers. International Journal of Advancement in Life Sciences Research, 5, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.31632/ijalsr.2022.v05i02.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shan, G., Li, W., Bao, S., Hu, X., Liu, J., Zhu, L., &amp; Tan, W. (2023). Energy and Nutrient Recovery by Spent Mushroom Substrate-Assisted Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sewage Sludge. Waste Management, 155, 192-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shannon, E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sherwin, W. B. (2010). Entropy and Information Approaches to Genetic Diversity and Its Expression: Genomic Geography. Entropy, 12, 1765-1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12071765</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sherwin, W. B., &amp; Prat i Fornells, N. (2019). The Introduction of Entropy and Information Methods to Ecology by Ramon Margalef. Entropy, 21, Article 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21080794</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, M. P., Rai, S. N., Dubey, S. K., Pandey, A. T., Tabassum, N., Chaturvedi, V. K., &amp; Singh, N. B. (2022). Biomolecules of Mushroom: A Recipe of Human Wellness. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 42, 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1964431</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Welsh, J., &amp; McClelland, M. (1990). Fingerprinting Genomes Using PCR with Arbitrary Primers. Nucleic Acids Research, 18, 7213-7218. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.24.7213</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wijayawardene, N. N., Boonyuen, N., Ranaweera, C. B., de Zoysa, H. K. S., Padmathilake, R. E., Nifla, F., Dai, D.-Q., Liu, Y., Suwannarach, N., Kumla, J. et al. (2023). OMICS and Other Advanced Technologies in Mycological Applications. Journal of Fungi, 9, Article 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060688</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, J. G., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., &amp; Tingey, S. V. (1990). DNA Polymorphisms Amplified by Arbitrary Primers Are Useful as Genetic Markers. Nucleic Acids Research, 18, 6531-6535. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, J. H., Ng, T. B., Chan, H. H. L., Liu, Q., Man, G. C. W., Zhang, C. Z., Guan, S., Ng, C. C. W., Fang, E. F., Wang, H. et al. (2020). Mushroom Extracts and Compounds with Suppressive Action on Breast Cancer: Evidence from Studies Using Cultured Cancer Cells, Tumor-Bearing Animals, and Clinical Trials. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104, 4675-4703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10476-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yan, P. S., Luo, X. C., &amp; Zhou, Q. (2004). RAPD Molecular Differentiation of the Cultivated Strains of the Jelly Mushrooms, Auricularia auricula and A. polytricha. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20, 795-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-5840-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeb, M., Ullah, A., Ullah, F., Haq, A., Ullah, I., Badshah, L., &amp; Haq, M. A. (2023). Diversity and Biological Characteristics of Macrofungi of District Bajaur, a Remote Area of Pakistan in the Hindu Kush Range. Heliyon, 9, E17818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17818</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127555-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, S., Gao, Q., Rong, C., Wang, S., Zhao, Z., Liu, Y., &amp; Xu, J. (2020). Immunomodulatory Effects of Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms and Their Bioactive Immunoregulatory Products. Journal of Fungi (Basel), 6, Article 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040269</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>