<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2023.115011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-127553</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Carbides Formation in MarM247 Directional Solidified during Stress-Rupture Test at High Temperature
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daniel</surname><given-names>Moreno</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Itzik</surname><given-names>Mizrahi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuri</surname><given-names>Lipkin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vasiliy</surname><given-names>Zevin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elinor</surname><given-names>Itzhak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zion</surname><given-names>Harush</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Beth Shemesh Engines Ltd., FAA &amp;amp; EASA, Beth Shemesh, Israel</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In our study, stress-rupture tests were conducted at elevated temperatures to examine the impact of high temperature on MarM247 LC (low carbon). Our main objective was to investigate the alterations in the microstructure, particularly the carbon precipitation, during long-term stress-rupture tests. It was observed that cracks developed near the sample neck, following the path of the carbides and the gamma matrix, rather than occurring in the gamma-gamma prime eutectic. This occurred despite the formation of carbides because of prolonged exposure to high temperature and load, and the crack propagation did not follow that path. Based on these findings, we suggest that a reduction in the carbon content of Mar-M247 LC can enhance the sample's lifespan when subjected to temperatures below 760
  &amp;#730;C and a stress of 690 MPa.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>MarM247</kwd><kwd> Carbides</kwd><kwd> Stress-Rupture</kwd><kwd> High-Temperature</kwd><kwd> Crack-Propagation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The demand for high-performance alloys in the manufacturing of turbine blades for fuel-efficient aircraft engines has led to the advancement of production technologies and the development of nickel-based superalloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref4">4</xref>] . One of the main causes of failure in polycrystalline blades under high load and temperature is the presence of perpendicular or nearly perpendicular grain boundaries to the applied mechanical stress, which are weak points in the material. Over time, these failure sources, subjected to alternating stresses and high temperatures, degrade the metallurgical state of the alloy. To address this issue, Directional Solidification (DS) and Single Crystal (SC) casting technologies have been developed, enabling the production of superalloy blades without grain boundaries perpendicular to the load in DS or without grains altogether in the case of SC. These advancements have improved the service life and performance of the engine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref6">6</xref>] . Furthermore, to optimize the alloying elements and enhance efficiency in the engines, these new casting technologies were integrated with conventional cast equiaxed alloys that were already available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The casting process of Mar-M247 alloy, which encompasses the solidification temperature range of 1172˚C to 1187˚C, involves constitutional decomposition in the as-cast product, resulting in small eutectic compositions of gamma and gamma prime in the inter-dendritic zones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref7">7</xref>] . The processing of nickel-based superalloys includes heat treatment, which entails the dissolution of the “butterfly-shaped” gamma prime phase formed during the cooling of the cast product. This is followed by rapid cooling to achieve small-sized spherical gamma prime phases, and ultimately, aging to obtain an optimal cuboidal gamma prime structure with high density in the gamma matrix. The eutectic compositions of gamma and gamma prime in the inter-dendritic regions are highly sensitive to incipient melting during the solution heat treatment and are crucial for the final mechanical properties of the superalloy at high temperatures. However, the formation of undesirable phases such as carbides, topologically close-packed (TCP) phases (sigma, &#181;, and Laves phases), also affects the mechanical properties of the alloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>In Mar-M247 alloy, an additional amount of Nb was introduced to modify the ideal conditions for solution heat treatment. The recommended temperature for this treatment is approximately 1260˚C for 8 hours, which enables the alloy to achieve a homogeneous gamma matrix with fine gamma prime phases. However, incipient melting was observed at 1280˚C in this alloy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref9">9</xref>] . Thermodynamic calculations have shown that the lower temperature for solutioning in Mar-M247 superalloy is around 1220˚C. At 1210˚C, eutectic microstructures were observed in the inter-dendritic regions after a long period of heat treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The instability of microstructures in superalloys was investigated after creep tests at high temperatures to evaluate their impact on mechanical properties. It was found that the nucleation of microcracks primarily occurs in high-angle boundaries inclined to the stress axis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref11">11</xref>] . However, changes in certain metallurgical microstructures showed low correlation with the failure process. Electromagnetic techniques were employed to estimate the remaining lifespan of a nickel-based alloy under low-cycle fatigue, considering the effect of chromium depletion on the paramagnetic and ferromagnetic properties of the alloy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref12">12</xref>] . The chromium content at the crack surfaces increased, and oxygen was detected on the surface and crack flanks. Kirka et al. reported that the aged microstructure of directionally solidified Ni-based superalloys does not significantly affect fatigue life, except in the case of perpendicular rafted microstructures, which led to an increase in the number of cycles until failure occurred [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref13">13</xref>] . In a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) study conducted by Smith et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref14">14</xref>] , it was observed that the χ and η phases, along with the γʹ stacking faults, exhibit a strong correlation with improved creep strength. The use of advanced techniques and chemical mapping allowed for the identification of specific lattice sites where elemental segregation occurs in conjunction with lattice faults. Atomistic studies focused on controlling deformation at the atomic level revealed that Nb and Ta are promising alloying elements for inducing transformations in the χ and η phases, whereas Re, W, and Mo show promise in Co alloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Furthermore, it was reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref15">15</xref>] that carbide growth occurs during high-temperature exposure in creep tests. In many instances, the presence of carbides enhances the resistance of superalloys to high temperatures under moderate loads. However, in some cases, the development of carbides within microporosity sites can lead to the initiation of micro-cracks, eventually resulting in failure.</p><p>The main objective of this research is to examine the alterations and failure mechanisms that arise in MarM247 LC (low carbon) following stress-rupture tests conducted at high temperatures. The investigation focuses on the metamorphosis of the metallurgical structure and aims to identify the source of the final failure.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>A commercial MarM247LC superalloy ingot, with a chemical composition summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, was cast using a directional solidification process in an ALD single crystal furnace. This process yielded 15 directional solidified rods, each measuring 15 mm in diameter and 210 mm in length. Metallographic inspection revealed the presence of 3 to 6 grains in the cross-section, with a unified growth direction predominantly near the &lt;001&gt; orientation as the preferred growth direction for this superalloy. Following inspection, the rods were subjected to a full standard heat treatment.</p><p>After undergoing a solutioning treatment at 1250˚C for 2 hours, the rods were subjected to a two-stage aging process for precipitation treatment. The first stage involved aging at 1079˚C for 4 hours, followed by a second stage aging at 871˚C for 20 hours, with subsequent cooling in argon gas. The temperature accuracy within the furnace was maintained within &#177;2˚C, and the entire heat treatment</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical composition of Mar-M247LC used in the presented work</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elements (Ni bal.)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Co</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard (wt./o)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4 - 5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1 - 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3 - 9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 - 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 - 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 - 1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 - 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007 - 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 - 0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >This work (wt./o)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.078</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Traces elements and boiling point elements according to standard AMS2280.</p><p>process was conducted under a vacuum of 10<sup>−4</sup> mbar.</p><p>Following the heat treatment, the rods were machined into bond-shaped samples, with a 1/2-inch screw (NCX13) adapted to the stress-rupture test grips. The samples featured a graded reduction from the 12 mm diameter to a 6.35 mm diameter along the 37 mm gauge length of the sample obtaining 6 mm radius in a graded reduction. The total length of the sample was 86 mm. Tensile tests were conducted on these samples at 760˚C to assess their mechanical properties. The master alloy, tested prior to compliance, exhibited favorable results with a yield strength (0.2% offset) of 907 MPa, ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 1093 MPa, and 14% elongation in 4D.</p><p>The machined directional solidified rods were then subjected to stress rupture tests at different temperatures and stress levels. Specifically, the tests were conducted at 690 MPa, 221 MPa, and 138 MPa, at temperatures of 760˚C, 982˚C, and 1038˚C, respectively. Upon failure, the remaining portions of the samples were cross-sectioned, with particular focus on the region near the neck where the maximum deformation occurred. This allowed for the observation of microstructural changes under load and prolonged exposure to high temperatures.</p><p>This work specifically reports on the post-stress rupture metallographic cross-section of the sample that endured 711 hours under a stress of 690 MPa at 760˚C. The aim is to investigate the microstructural changes along different regions of the samples exposed to varying loads, including the screw zone (experiencing very low stresses), the graded reduction diameter zone between the screw zone and the gauge length (experiencing moderate stresses), the gauge length (experiencing high stresses), and the region near the neck (experiencing the maximum deformation). The microstructure was examined using optical microscopy and SEM-EDS techniques.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> the mechanical properties of the samples are reported:</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Stress-Strain test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature [˚C]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Y.P (0.2%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >UTS [MPa]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>o </sub> Start Dia. [mm]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub> Final Dia. [mm]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reduction Area [%]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >870˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >766</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.889</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Stress-Rupture test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature [˚C]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stress [MPa]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>o </sub> Start Dia. [mm]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub> Final Dia. [mm]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reduction Area [%]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lifetime [hours]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Over Lifetime factor from Standards</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >711</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In this study, the focus was targeted to the cross sections of the mechanical properties sample that achieve 711 hr. under 690 MPa at 760˚C, presented according to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, in Figures 2-4. Zones B and C present an unaffected structure by the load applied rather than zones D and E that present some nucleation of carbides and nitrides that show to be the sources of the discontinuities and inter-dendritic micro-cracks. The carbides and nitrides phases exist in all the zones in the sample even in the pre-load sample as show <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(A), but <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(E) zone present some evidence of carbides conglomeration under load, high temperature and time that can be source to the weakness of the E zone and the micro-cracks formation in the carbide traces path. In the other hand, the crack propagation avoids the gamma-gamma prime eutectic as shows <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron diffraction spectroscopy (EDS) in Figures 5-7 reveled the present of new phase elaborated during the long-term test under 690 MPa loading at 760˚C during 711 hr. but no precipitation coarsening or rafting.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the precipitates along the sample in the different zones without significant change of the precipitates compared to A that represent the metallography micro-structure of the sample after heat treatment. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> compare two gamma-gamma prime eutectic structures’ one in the neck (zone E) and in the screw (zone B). The formation of carbides under high load at high temperature can be observed in the right image in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> that represent a nearest gamma-gamma prime eutectic to the crack path. In the other hand, the left</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> EDS chemical analysis of the carbides in the image of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> according to the marked points on the picture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Weight %</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Weight % error (&#177;1 Sigma)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;9.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;4.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;6.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;2.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;3.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Atom %</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Point 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>image in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> represent a gamma-gamma prime eutectic in the screw where no load but same temperature of the sample insignificant number of carbides can be observed.</p><p>EDS analysis was carried out on the sample shown in the right image of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> as can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. Six points of the new phases to be suspected as carbides in the picture were analyzed, and the results summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Elements that form carbide as Cr, Ta and W were detected with a parallel amount of carbon in all points. No nitrogenized phases were found.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The main purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in microstructure during the exposure of a directional solidified Mar-M247 LC sample to a stress of 690 MPa at 760˚C for 711 hours. The microstructure observations did not reveal significant precipitation changes in the gamma prime phase or rafting, but</p><p>there was an increase in the presence of carbides. The aggregation of these carbides within the gamma matrix could potentially be related to the formation of microcracks under the combined influence of load and temperature.</p><p>Previous research conducted by Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref16">16</xref>] concluded that at 850˚C, the secondary gamma prime phase did not exhibit significant growth, whereas the tertiary gamma prime phase clearly coarsened. However, we did not observe this behavior at 760˚C in our study. Li also noted that Ta forms a gamma prime film around MC and M<sub>23</sub>C<sub>6</sub> carbide types, leading to a decrease in mechanical properties during thermal exposure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref16">16</xref>] . Kalyanasundaram et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref17">17</xref>] further emphasized this behavior by presenting scanning electron microscopy images showing coarsening carbides, which were attributed to thermal exposure and shear stresses. These carbides were found to agglomerate near cracks, while gamma prime was located close to the fracture in samples exposed to stresses ranging from 500 - 650 MPa at 800˚C.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> illustrates zone D, where coarsening carbide agglomeration is observed, resembling a shear band in FCC alloys within a &lt;01-1&gt; {111} crystallographic shear system, as reported elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref18">18</xref>] . These findings strongly suggest that the driving force behind carbide formation is associated with shear bands, but further investigation using different techniques is needed to confirm this. Recently, Nordin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127553-ref19">19</xref>] used the Differential Scanning Calorimetric (DSC) technic to characterize the crystallization kinetic of a high entropy bulk samples and the average activation energy value. The DSC technic could be used to confirm the process and formation kinetics of the carbide formation presented in this paper as a future study. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the sample fouler crack and emphasize the conglomeration of suspected carbides all the crack path. Moreover, in the gamma gamma-prime eutectic near the crack path many suspected carbides can be observed that sustain the assumption that carbides are formed during the long-term stress rupture test and the sample weakness in the neck zone is attributed to the brittleness of those phases, correspond to M<sub>x</sub>C<sub>y</sub> compositions. The detection of high amount of major elements that crate carbides as Cr, Ta, W, with high correlation with the Carbon amount presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, support the assumption that these small particle phases are carbides.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The main conclusions in the present work can be summarized as follows:</p><p>1) During the stress rupture test at temperatures lower than 760˚C, no gamma-prime coarsening or rafting was observed after 711 hours under 690 MPa.</p><p>2) In the neck (zone E) under the same conditions, but in addition of maximum deformation, precipitation of carbides was observed.</p><p>3) No carbide precipitation was found at 760˚C during 711 hours without load.</p><p>4) Cracks were found near the sample neck that followed the path of the carbides and the gamma matrix in addition to the gamma-gamma prime eutectic outside boundaries, despite the formation of carbides in the eutectic phase.</p><p>5) Based on our findings; we can suggest that by reducing carbon amount in Mar-M247 LC can improve the lifetime of the sample at temperatures lower than 760˚C under stresses.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Moreno, D., Mizrahi, I., Lipkin, Y., Zevin, V., Itzhak, E. and Harush, Z. (2023) Carbides Formation in MarM247 Directional Solidified during Stress-Rupture Test at High Temperature. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 11, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2023.115011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127553-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strangman, T.E. and Hoppin III, G.S. (1980) Development of Exothermically Cast Single Crystal MarM247 and Derivative Alloys. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Superalloys, Champion, 21-25 September 1980, 215-224. https://doi.org/10.7449/1980/Superalloys_1980_215_224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoppin III, G.S., Fujii, M. and Strangman, T.E. (1977) Low-Cost Single-Crystal Turbine Blades. NASA-Lewis Research Center Contract NAS 3.20073, July 1977-December 1979.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duhl, D.N. and Nguyen-Dmh, X. (1980) Evaluation of Single Crystal Superalloys. AIME Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, 24-28 February 1980, 215-224.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strangman, T.E., Fujii, M. and Nguyen-Dinh, X. (1980) Development of Coated Single Crystal Superalloy System for Gas Turbine Applications. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Superalloys, Champion, 21-25 September 1980, 795-804.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harris, K., Erickson, G.L. and Schwe, R.E. (1984) MAR-M247 Derivations—CM 247 LC DS Alloy CMSX Single Crystal Alloy Properties and Performance. Superalloy 1984 Conference Proceeding, Champion, 7-11 October 1984, 221-230.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harris, K. and Erickson, G.L. (1979) Vacuum Induction Refined MM 0011 (MAR M-247) for Investment Cast Turbine Components. Proceedings of 6th International Vacuum Metallurgy Conference on Special Melting, San Diego, 23-27 April 1979, 319-339.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Przeliorz, R. and Pi&amp;#261;tkowski, J. (2017) Application of DSC Method in Studies on Phase Transitions of Ni Superalloys. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 17, 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1515/afe-2017-0144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, W., Xie, Z.C., Zhang, S.Y., et al. (2023) Tailoring the Plasticity of Topologically Close-Packed Phases via the Crystals’ Fundamental Building Blocks. Advanced Materials, 2023, Article ID: 2300586. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202300586</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azevedo e Silva, P.R.S., Baldan, R., Nunes, C.A., Coelho, G.C. and da Silva Costa, A.M. (2013) Solution Heat-Treatment of Nb-Modified MAR-M247 Superalloy. Material Characterization, 75, 214-219.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baldan, R., da Rocha, R.L.P., Tomasiello, R.B., et al. (2013) Solutioning and Aging of MAR-M247 Nickel-Based Superalloy. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 22, 2574-2579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-013-0565-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lavigne, O., Ramusat, C., Drawin, S., Caron, P., Boivin, D. and Pouchou, J.-L. (2004) Relationships between Microstructural and Mechanical Properties Behavior in New Generation Nickel-Base Single Crystal Superalloys. Superalloys 2004: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Superalloys, Champion, 19-23 September 2004, 667-675. https://www.tms.org/Superalloys/10.7449/2004/Superalloys_2004_667_675.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barton, S., Weiss, M.K.-B. and Maier, H.J. (2022) In-Situ Characterization of Microstructural Changes in Alloy 718 during High-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue. Metals, 12, Article No. 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111871</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirka, M.M., Brindley, K.A., Neu, R.W., Antolovich, S.D., Shinde, S.R. and Gravett, P.W. (2015) Influence of Coarsened and Rafted Microstructures on the Thermomechanical Fatigue of a Ni-Base Superalloy. International Journal of Fatigue, 81, 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, T.M., Zarkevich, N.A., Egan, A.J., et al. (2021) Utilizing Local Phase Transformation Strengthening for Nickel-Base Superalloys. Communications Materials, 2, Article No. 106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-021-00210-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, L.R., Jin, T., Zhao, N.R., Sun, X.F., Guan, H.R. and Hu, Z.Q. (2003) Formation of Carbides and Their Effects on Stress Rupture of a Ni-Base Single Crystal Superalloy. Materials Science and Engineering A, 361, 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00517-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, L.X., Gong, X.F., Wang, C.S., Wu, Y.S., Yu, H.Y., Su, H.J. and Zhou, L.Z. (2021) Correlation between Phase Stability and Tensile Properties of the Ni-Based Superalloy MAR-M247. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 34, 872-884. https://www.amse.org.cn/EN/10.1007/s40195-020-01139-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalyanasundarama, V., De Lucaa, A., Wróbel, R., Tanga, J., Holdswortha, S.R., Leinenbacha, C. and Hosseini, E. (2023) Tensile and Creep-Rupture Response of Additively Manufactured Nickel-Based Superalloy CM247LC. Additive Manufacturing Letters, 5, Article ID: 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.100119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eggeler, G., Wieczorek, N., Fox, F., Berglund, S., Burger, D., Dlouhy, A., et al. (2018) On Shear Testing of Single Crystal Ni-Base Superalloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 49, 3951-3962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4726-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127553-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nordin, N.H., Mohamad, F.S. and Jamal, N.A. (2020) Non-Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics of a Rapidly Solidified as-Cast TiZrHfNiCu High Entropy Bulk Metallic Glass. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8, 280-295. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2020.83023</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>