<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Entomology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-1991</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ae.2023.114017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AE-127547</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Diversity of Insect Flower Visitors on Macadamia within a Monoculture Orchard in Murang’a County, Central Kenya
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicholas</surname><given-names>I. Njue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>James</surname><given-names>W. Muthomi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>George</surname><given-names>N. Chemining’wa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>John</surname><given-names>H. Nderitu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Josiah</surname><given-names>Achieng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>James</surname><given-names>J. Odanga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Invertebrate Zoology Section, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>255</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Macadamia is cultivated for its nutritious edible kernel. In Kenya, the crop is predominantly grown by smallholder farmers mainly for export markets. Macadamia trees also enhance agro-forestry conservation, in the East African farmlands, by providing habitat and floral resources to beneficial arthropods such as insect pollinators. Allogamy of macadamia flowers is largely dependent on insects that pollinate and consequently influence the nut set, retention and yield. However, there is limited information on macadamia insect flower visitors in Kenya. This article assessed the diversity of insects that forage flowers of macadamia crop, and further evaluated their temporal distribution, in Murang’a county, central Kenya. Insect flower visitors were sampled weekly using a butterfly net for twelve consecutive months, from January 2021 to December 2021. Sixty-one insect species were recorded foraging macadamia flowers in Murang’a county, central Kenya. There was a statistical difference in the Simpson diversity index among weather seasons, dry, long rain, cold and short rain (p &lt; 0.0005) and between two flowering patterns, dense and sparse (p &lt; 0.0005). The findings of this study confirmed that diverse species of bees, butterflies and true flies forage flowers of macadamia crop in central Kenya, with the honey bee (
  Apis mellifera), a key pollinator species, being the most abundant flower visitor. This study provides strong baseline information, to scientists and farmers, on probable macadamia pollinator species, in central Kenya. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Macadamia</kwd><kwd> Flowers</kwd><kwd> Insect</kwd><kwd> Diversity</kwd><kwd> Kenya</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Macadamia tree is native to Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref5">5</xref>] and is cultivated worldwide for its nutritious edible kernel and oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref9">9</xref>] . In Kenya, macadamia is an important lucrative cash crop that is predominantly cultivated by smallholder farmers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref12">12</xref>] . The smallholder farmers generate seventy percent of the annual production of macadamia nuts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref11">11</xref>] , whereas the rest is produced by large-scale commercial orchards. The macadamia agro-processing sectors target both local and international markets. North America, Europe, China and Japan are the major international markets for the Kenyan macadamia nuts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref14">14</xref>] . Kenya is ranked third globally after Australia and South Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref15">15</xref>] , with a market share of thirteen percent, which accounts for an annual production of 42,500 tonnes of nut-in-shell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Macadamia integrifolia Maiden &amp; Betsche and Macadamia tetraphylla Johnson (Proteaceae) are the two species grown in Kenya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref17">17</xref>] . The land area under macadamia cultivation, in central Kenya, has expanded spatially over years with Embu, Meru, Kirinyaga, Nyeri, Kiambu and Murang’a being the leading counties in the production of the nuts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref18">18</xref>] . The planting of macadamia, also, enhances biodiversity through agro-forestry conservation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref19">19</xref>] in the farmlands, which surrounds Mount Kenya, in central Kenya. The iconic Mount Kenya is the most expansive mountainous biodiversity habitat, in Kenya, consisting mainly of native vegetation in protected upland areas and some agro-ecosystems such as monoculture macadamia farms in the midlands.</p><p>Flowers of macadamia trees provide nectar and pollen utilized by many beneficial insect species such as insect pollinators that may enhance nut set, retention and yield. For example, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref21">21</xref>] reported that the initial nut set and consequent nut retention are dependent on the increased visitation of flowers by the insect pollinators such as bees, butterflies, flies, moths and wasps. Therefore, efficient pollination of macadamia flowers is a prerequisite to producing high nut yields that are of superior quality. A mature macadamia tree produces over two million flowers during peak blossoming season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref22">22</xref>] . However, only three percent develop into mature nuts of superior quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Macadamia pollination is animal-mediated due to the morphological features of its flower and the small area of receptivity on stigmas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref24">24</xref>] . The macadamia flower visitors such as Apis mellifera (honey bee) and Trigona spp. positively influenced the nut yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref25">25</xref>] , in Australia. Conversely, the exclusion of insect flower visitors resulted in lower nut-in-shell and kernel weights [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>The flowers of the macadamia crop are perfect with both male and female parts borne on racemes arising from leaf axils, which are partially self-incompatible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref2">2</xref>] . Racemes are pendantsin shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) ranging from ten to twenty centimetres long, with between one hundred and three hundred flowers that have small sticky stigmas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref28">28</xref>] . The macadamia flowers contain small quantities of fructose, glucose and nectar due to their small sizes. For this reason, tinny-bodied arthropods, specifically, insects are the best pollinators and most abundant flower</p><p>visitors. However, there is limited information on insect species that pollinate macadamia flowers in Kenya. This study was initiated to assess the diversity of insect flower visitors that forage flowers of macadamia in Murang’a county within central Kenya. The specific objectives of this study were to: 1) generate an annotated checklist of the insect flower visitors that forage on macadamia flowers in a homogenous macadamia orchard at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre in Murang’a county within central Kenya; 2) assess species diversity of the insect flower visitors in four weather seasons; and 3) assess species diversity of the insect flower visitors in two flowering patterns in the study area.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area and Weather Seasonality</title><p>Field surveys of insect flower visitors were conducted between January 2021 and December 2021, in a homogenous macadamia orchard at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre in Murang’a county within central Kenya. The study area is located between 0˚59'43.9''S, 37˚03'31.0''E and 1˚00'00.7''S, 37˚03'39.2''E, in East Africa. Kandara is a sub-county within Murang’a county that has deep and well-drained red or brown nitosols soils. Total monthly rainfall and mean temperature of the study area ranged from 1.2 mm to 254.2 mm and 17.4˚C to 22˚C, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The study area has four weather seasons namely: cold season that occurs during the months of June, July and August, dry (January, February and September), short rain (October, November and December, and long rain (March, April and May).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mean temperature and total rainfall data ranges during the four weather seasons of the study area. The information was summarized from field weather data recorded at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre, from January 2021 to December 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weather season</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total rainfall (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean temperature (˚C)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 - 8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4 - 18.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 - 94.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7 - 21.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Short rain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.6 - 205.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8 - 21.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Long rain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2 - 254.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8 - 22.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Crop and Its Flowering Patterns</title><p>The smooth-shelled Macadamia integrifolia is the most predominant species at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre. Macadamia integrifolia is an evergreen tree that grows to a height ranging between 12.5 metres to 16.0 metres and with the base width of lower branches ranging between 3.2 metres and 6.6 metres. In central Kenya, the macadamia trees blossoms throughout the year with months of August, September and October having dense flowering whereas January, February, March, April, May, June, July, November and December having sparse blooming. The dense and sparse flowering patterns were described by percentage blossoming, where flowering less than fifty percent was regarded as sparse and 50% and above flowering was termed as dense or fully blossomed, during the survey.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling Design and Survey of Insect Flower Visitors</title><p>The monoculture macadamia orchard, at Kandara sub-county in central Kenya, was sub-divided into five study blocks with each consisting of at least twenty mature trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In each study block, five flowering trees were selected for assessment of insect flower visitors every week. In a study block, a set of five macadamia trees were sampled once every two weeks for insect pollinators.</p><p>The sampling of insect flower visitors was carried out for three days per week for twelve months, commencing in January 2021 up to December 2021. The weekly sampling was conducted between 0800 hours and 1700 hours. This sampling protocol was replicated for each of the five study blocks. Thirty minutes were spent to sample insect pollinators that came into contact with the inflorescences on each selected macadamia tree in a block, using butterfly nets. The collected hymenopterans and dipterans collected were transferred into vials containing seventy percent alcohol whereas lepidopteran specimens were preserved in butterfly envelopes as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref29">29</xref>] . The vials and envelopes containing the sampled insect specimens were transported to laboratory and stored in a freezer at 0˚C (Sanyo, model MCF300SG, Osaka, Japan) for twenty-four hours, in order to relax them and also kill any pests that may be embedded onto the vials or envelops.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Morphological Identification of the Insect Specimens</title><p>All insect specimens were examined under a stereo microscope (Wild Heerbrugg, model M3B, Gais, Switzerland) and sorted into morpho-species at the entomology laboratory of the National Museums of Kenya, in Nairobi. The morpho-species were later identified into species using taxonomic manuals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref33">33</xref>] . The fully identified specimens were verified using entomological collections at the National Museums of Kenya and the respective voucher specimens were deposited in the insect collection at the National Museums of Kenya.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>Species accumulation curves were generated using the biodiversity R package, to assess completeness of survey of the macadamia insect flower visitors in monoculture orchard at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref34">34</xref>] . Projected species richness, was generated using non parametric tests: Chao, Jackknife one, Jacknife two and Boot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref37">37</xref>] . The non-parametric algorithms predicted number of yet-to-be-collected species based on quantification of rarity, which is computed statistically from community data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref35">35</xref>] . A Species checklist was computed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016 and the species within each insect family were arranged alphabetically, in ascending order. Diversity evenness of the insect flower visitors was measured using Shannon and Simpson indices.</p><p>Mean number of insect flower visitors among the four weather seasons: cold, dry, short rain and long rain, was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. T-test was performed to compare mean number of insect flower visitors between the two flowering seasons: dense and sparse. The analyses were computed using statistical software R, version 4.2.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref34">34</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Sixty-one insect flower visitor species belonging to three orders and eleven families were recorded foraging on macadamia flowers at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre in Murang’a county, central Kenya. The species accumulation revealed there were sixty-one insect species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) whereas non-parametric species richness estimators predicted 64.99 &#177; 2.44 for Chao, 68.43 &#177; 6.56 for Jacknife one, 69.25 &#177; 3.86 for Jacknife two and 72.96 &#177; 3.86 species for Boot.</p><p>Diptera, Hymenoptera (Apoidea) and Lepidoptera accounted for 39.34%, 32.79% and 27.87%, respectively, of the total number of species recorded in the study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The most abundant species were Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Rhyncomya soyauxi (Diptera: Rhiniidae) and Isomyia dubiosa (Diptera: Rhiniidae) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) with total number of individuals: 1480, 797 and 308, respectively. Apis mellifera, Lasioglossum sp2 and Braunsapis sp. were the most abundant among Hymenoptera (Apoidea) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Rhyncomya soyauxi, Isomyia dubiosa and Rhingia apicalis were the most abundant species among the Diptera (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Eretis lugens, Eurema desjardinsi and Pontia helice were the most abundant species among the Lepidoptera (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The most abundant and key insect flower visitors were the same in different months. They were Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera), Rhyncomya soyauxi (Diptera), Isomyia dubiosa (Diptera), Rhingia apicalis (Diptera), Lasioglossum sp2 (Hymenoptera), Braunsapis sp. (Hymenoptera) and Lasioglossum sp1 (Hymenoptera) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), in descending order.</p><p>Cold season, long rain, short rain and dry season accounted for 33.04%, 25.89%, 20.54% and 20.54% of the total number of species recorded in the study area, respectively. There was statistical difference in mean &#177; SE number of species among the four weather seasons (ANOVA; F = 8.617, p = 0.00013) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). There was statistical difference in mean &#177; SE number of species between the two flowering patterns (t-test; t = 4.139, p = 0.0001487) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The mean &#177; SE number of species per month was 6.74 &#177; 1.31. There was statistical difference among mean &#177; SE monthly species number (ANOVA; F = 13.92, p &lt; 0.0001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The peak mean &#177; SE number of species began from the month of May to October with July recording the highest mean &#177; SE number of species. Tukey’s pairwise comparison of weather seasons revealed significant differences between the following pairs: dry and cold, long rain and cold. Short rain and cold, long rain and dry, short rain and dry, and short rain and long rain were not significantly different.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> List of insect flower visitors found foraging on macadamia inflorescences at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre in Murang’a county within central Kenya, from January 2021 to December 2021. Dry, cold, long rain and short rain are weather seasons while dense and sparse refers to the flowering patterns. √ refers to presence of a species in weather and macadamia flowering seasons whereas blank refers to absence. The calendar months that fall within weather seasons and flowering patterns are described in materials and methods</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Order</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Log abundance</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Common name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Author/year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cold</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Short rain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Long rain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dense</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >sparse</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="20"  >Hymenoptera</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Apidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amegilla fallax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue-banded bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Smith, 1879</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amegilla sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue-banded bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Friese, 1897</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apis mellifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Honey bee</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linnaeus, 1758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Braunsapis sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reed bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Michener, 1969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ceratina aereola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small carpenter bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vachal, 1903</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ceratina sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small carpenter bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latereille, 1802</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylocopa flavorufa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carpenter bee</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DeGeer, 1778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylocopa nigrita</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carpenter bee</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabricius, 1775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Halictidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Halictus tinctulus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mining bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cockerell, 1937</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lasioglossum sp1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curtis, 1833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lasioglossum sp2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curtis, 1833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lasioglossum sp3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curtis, 1833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipotriches sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gerstaecker, 1858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nomia sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latereille, 1804</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seladonia sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Robertson, 1918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thrinchostoma sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweat bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saussure, 1890</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Megachilidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heriades sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Armored-resin bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spinola, 1808</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Megachile basalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf cutter bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Smith, 1853</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Megachile bombiformis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf cutter bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gerstaecker, 1858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Megachile rufiventris</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf cutter bees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guerin-Meneville, 1834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Diptera</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Rhiniidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isomyia dubiosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nose flies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villeneuve, 1917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhingia apicalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nose flies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Matsumura, 1905</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhyncomya soyauxi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nose flies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Karsch, 1886</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomorhina lunata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nose flies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabricius, 1805</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomorhina rugosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nose flies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bigot, 1888</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomorhina sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nose flies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rondani, 1861</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="18"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="12"  >Syrphidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Allograpta calopus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loew, 1858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asarkina fiorii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bezii, 1903</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Betasyrphus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Matsumura, 1917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eristalinus dulcis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Karsch, 1887</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eristalinus quinquelineatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabricius, 1781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eristalinus taeniops</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wiedemann, 1818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ischiodon aegyptius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bigot, 1884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paragus longiventris</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loew, 1858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phytomia incisa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wiedemann, 1830</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhingia pulcherrima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bezii, 1908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Syritta sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lepeletier &amp; Serville, 1828</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxomerus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hoverflies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macuart, 1855</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Calliphoridae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chrysomya albiceps</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blow fly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wiedemann, 1819</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chrysomya chloropyga</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blow fly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wiedemann, 1818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemipyrellia sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blow fly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Townsend, 1918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pericallmyia spinigera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blow fly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villeneuve, 1915</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phumosia imitans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blow fly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villeneuve, 1916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tricyclea bifrons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blow fly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malloch, 1929</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="14"  >Lepidoptera</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Hesperidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eretis lugens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Savannah elf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rogenhofer, 1891</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spialia dromus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forest sandman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plotz, 1884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zenonia zeno</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange-spotted hopper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trimen, 1864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Lycaenidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lampides boeticus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bean butterfly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linnaeus, 1767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leptotes pirithous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lang’s short-tailed blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linnaeus, 1767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zizula hylax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gaika blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabricius, 1775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Nyamphalidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acraea eponina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small orange acraea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cramer, 1780</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Junonia sophia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Little pansy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabricius, 1793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Junonia terea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soldier pansy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drury, 1773</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neocoenyra gregorii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eyed ringlet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butler, 1894</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ypthimomorpha itonia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swamp ringlet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hewitson, 1865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Pieridae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Belenois creona</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >African caper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cramer, 1776</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colotis antevippe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Large orange tip</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boisduval, 1836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eurema desjardinsi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anled grass yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boisduval, 1833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eurema sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grass yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hubner, 1819</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pontia helice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Common meadow white</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linnaeus, 1764</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lepidoptera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erebidae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudonaclia sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tiger moth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butler, 1876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >√</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Cold weather season had the highest mean Shannon H diversity index (3.61 &#177; 0.18), followed by long rain (3.37 &#177; 0.16), dry (3.14 &#177; 0.12) and short rain (3.15 &#177; 0.13) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The mean Shannon H diversity index among the four weather seasons was not significantly different (p = 0.0503) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Conversely, there was significant statistical difference in mean Simpson D diversity index among four the weather seasons (p &lt; 0.0005) with the cold being the highest (0.98 &#177; 0.07) while dry had the lowest (0.95 &#177; 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference of mean Shannon H diversity index (p = 0.06704) between two flowering patterns: dense and sparse (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). On the contrary, there was a significant statistical difference of mean Simpson D diversity index (p &lt; 0.0005) between the two flowering patterns (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Macadamia flowers, at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre in central Kenya, attracted diverse number of insect flower visitors from three orders, namely: Diptera, Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. The diverse number of species recorded foraging on the flowers implies that macadamia tree provides floral resources and possibly habitat to the insect flower visitors, some of which are important pollinators that influence nut set, retention and yield. The presence of different species on macadamia flowers implies that the crop is generalist in its pollination provision requirements. This is corroborated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref28">28</xref>] who reported that pollination of macadamia flowers are largely dependent on insect pollinators.</p><p>Macadamia blossoms massively and hence the need for diverse insect flower visitors to effectively pollinate the flowers to enhance nut set and development of mature nuts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref39">39</xref>] . For effective pollination, the racemes of macadamia flowers require fifty daily visits by bees, each lasting for approximately six hours or a total of about 150 bee visits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref23">23</xref>] . The macadamia flowers are only receptive for three days after opening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref23">23</xref>] hence the need for efficiency in their pollination by diverse insect species.</p><p>Honey bee, Apis mellifera, was the most abundant flower visitor that was recorded throughout the year and possibly the most significant contributor to pollination of macadamia crop, which concurs with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref40">40</xref>] . Apis mellifera was, further, reported as the most important pollinator of the African flora [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref41">41</xref>] . In this study, Apis mellifera foraged flowers to collect both nectar and pollen, and they were observed to have many swift visits on different macadamia flowers compared to other recorded insect flower visitors. The social ability of Apis mellifera to recruit nest mates to forage flowers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref43">43</xref>] and its active competitive</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Diversity evenness: Shannon H and Simpson D, of the insect pollinator species sampled on macadamia flowers at Kandara Macadamia Research Centre in Murang’a county within central Kenya, from January 2021 to December 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Diversity indices</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Weather season</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Flowering pattern (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Short rain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Long rain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dense</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sparse</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shannon H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.37 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 &#177; 0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simpson D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref44">44</xref>] may have enhanced its dominance and abundance in the study area. This character could have contributed to lesser recording of other bee pollinators on macadamia crop at the study area.</p><p>Apis mellifera competes with stingless bees for the floral resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref46">46</xref>] and the two species may not be present concurrently on the same flower. Moreover, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref47">47</xref>] established that the number of stingless bees on macadamia orchards was strongly influenced by distance from the colony while the distribution of honey bees was closely related to daily floral display. Bees such as Lassiglosum sp, Braunsapis sp. and Ceratina sp. were recorded foraging the flowers throughout the year in central Kenya. Generally, stingless bees are important pollinators of macadamia flowers in Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref48">48</xref>] and, also, in central Kenya. Due to their non-aggressive foraging style and competitive ability, any species of stingless bee had less numbers of individuals than the Apis mellifera, in this study. This was similar scenario of other bee species including Lipotriches sp., Nomia sp., Seladonia sp., Thrinchostoma sp., Megachile basalis, Megachile bombiformis and Megachile rufiventris that were recorded foraging macadamia flowers. Diverse bee species complements each other in pollination of crops and, thereby, contributing to generation of better yields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref50">50</xref>] . However, Trigona sp. was not recorded in this study, as observed in Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref24">24</xref>] , and this calls for further survey.</p><p>The presence of high number of species from three dipteran families: Rhiniidae, Calliphoridae and Syrphidae, that were recorded foraging flowers, implies that they could be pollinators of macadamia in central Kenya. This scenario was reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref51">51</xref>] in Australia where he identified twenty species from three families: Calliphoridae, Rhiniidae, and Syrphidae pollinating horticultural crops. In Malaysia, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref52">52</xref>] noted that Eristalinus spp. (Syrphidae) and Chrysomya spp. (Calliphoridae) are the most efficient and abundant pollinators of mango flowers. The true flies have diverse body sizes that are adapted to different flower morphology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref54">54</xref>] , a character that allows these insects to complement other pollinators. Species in the family Syrphidae have been shown to compliment bee pollination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref55">55</xref>] .</p><p>They have hairy body that collects pollen as they forage flowers. Adult true flies visit flowers for their nutritional needs thus collect nectar which is the source of their carbohydrates and pollen which provides protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref56">56</xref>] . The collected pollen is transferred to other flowers during subsequent visits, which leads to allogamy. Generally, dipterans are important pollinators of many crops, including macadamia.</p><p>Butterflies were observed foraging macadamia flowers, a scenario that has been reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref57">57</xref>] . In Brazil, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref21">21</xref>] reported butterflies as the most abundant and important pollinators of macadamia flowers. Generally, butterflies visit flowers to collect nectar as their food that is collected with their proboscis adapted even for long tubular flowers and in the process their bodies come into contact with the anthers thus pollen sticks on their tiny scales which is transferred to subsequent flowers they visit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref59">59</xref>] .</p><p>High mean number of species that occurred during dense flowering pattern was correlated to abundant floral resources provided by macadamia, a finding that concurs with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref60">60</xref>] who reported that insect pollinators depend on flower resources. However, floral resources were highly limited during sparse flowering pattern and weather was warming. Dense flowering pattern fell in between cold and dry weather seasons; a warm transition period that allowed enhanced reproductive ability and growth of insect pollinators. Conversely, there was lower mean number of insect flower visitors during sparse period, which coincided with long rain season.</p><p>The choice of butterfly net as the sampling tool [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref61">61</xref>] was mediated by the need to protect morphology of collected specimens and also to highly minimize damage to macadamia flowers. Reduced damage to flowers, during survey, allowed normal production level of macadamia nuts in the study area, whereas protection of specimen morphology enabled correct taxonomic identification of the pollinator species. However, employment of diverse sampling tools could have led to an increase in the number of pollinator insect species sampled. This scenario was confirmed by species accumulation curve that almost reached asymptote and relatively high number of predicted insect species that were generated by the non-parametric algorithms: Chao, Jackknife one, Jacknife two and Boot, compared to the sampled species. This challenge could be addressed by long-term biodiversity insect surveys, where rare singleton species are recorded frequently, which results in species accumulation reaching asymptote or peak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127547-ref64">64</xref>] . Further sampling efforts may lead to an increase in number of insect species that forage macadamia flowers in central Kenya.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion and Recommendations</title><p>This article provides strong baseline information, to scientists and farmers, on probable macadamia pollinator diversity, in central Kenya. The findings of this study confirmed that diverse species of bees, butterflies and true flies forage flowers of macadamia crop in central Kenya, with the honey bee (Apis mellifera), a key pollinator species, being the most abundant flower visitor. The study, therefore, recommends sustainable conservation of the insect flower visitors in the farmlands. There is, also, a need to investigate the specific efficiency of bees, dipterans, lepidopterans, and other insect species, in the pollination of macadamia flowers in the diverse agro-ecological zones in Kenya.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by the government of Kenya, through National Research Fund. Macadamia Research Centre, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, National Museums of Kenya and the University of Nairobi provided technical advice during field surveys and laboratory investigations.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Data Availability</title><p>The data is available in this article.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Njue, N.I., Muthomi, J.W., Chemining’wa, G.N., Nderitu, J.H., Achieng, J. and Odanga, J.J. (2023) Diversity of Insect Flower Visitors on Macadamia within a Monoculture Orchard in Murang’a County, Central Kenya. Advances in Entomology, 11, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2023.114017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127547-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyer, H. and Cock, I.E. (2013) Evaluation of the Potential of Macadamia integriflora Extracts as Antibacterial Food Agents. Pharmacognosy Communications, 3, 53-62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264458556_Evaluation_of_the_potential_of_Macadamia_integriflora_extracts_as_antibacterial_food_agents</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trueman, S.J. (2013) The Reproductive Biology of Macadamia. Scientia Horticulturae, 150, 354-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.11.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dailey, A. and Vuong, Q.V. (2015) Optimization of Aqueous Extraction Conditions for Recovery of Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Properties from Macadamia (Macadamia tetraphylla) Skin Waste. Antioxidants, 4, 699-718. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox4040699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mai, T.T., Hardner, C.M., Alam, M.M., Henry, R.J. and Topp, B.L. (2021) Phenotypic Characterisation for Growth and Nut Characteristics Revealed the Extent of Genetic Diversity in Wild Macadamia Germplasm. Agriculture, 11, Article 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasannath, K., Shivas, R.G., Galea, V.J. and Akinsanmi, O.A. (2021) Neopestalotiopsis Species Associated with Flower Diseases of Macadamia integrifolia in Australia. Journal of Fungi, 7, Article 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090771</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duke, J.A. (2018) CRC Handbook of Nuts. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351071130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hardner, C., Silva, J.C., Williams, E., Meyers, N. and McConchie, C. (2019) Breeding New Cultivars for the Australian Macadamia Industry. HortScience, 54, 621-628. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13286-18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaseke, T., Fawole, O.A. and Opara, U.L. (2021) Chemistry and Functionality of Cold-Pressed Macadamia Nut Oil. Processes, 10, Article 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Natasia, Y.U., Nasution, S.W. and Suci, T. (2023) Test the Potential of Macadamia Nut Oil (Macadamia F. Muell) as Sunscreen in Cream Preparations in Vitro. International Journal of Health and Pharmaceutical (IJHP), 3, 281-293. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijhp.v3i3.167</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gitonga, L.N., Muigai, A.W.T., Kahangi, E.M., Ngamau, K. and Gichuki, S.T. (2009) Status of Macadamia Production in Kenya and the Potential of Biotechnology in Enhancing Its Genetic Improvement. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 1, 49-59. http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/2699/Status%20of%20macadamia%20production%20in%20Kenya%20and%20the.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quiroz, D., Kuepper, B., Wachira, J. and Emmott, A. (2019) Value Chain Analysis of Macadamia Nuts in Kenya, Research Commissioned by CBI. Profundo, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zuza, E.J., Maseyk, K., Bhagwat, S., Emmott, A., Rawes, W. and Araya, Y.N. (2021) Review of Macadamia Production in Malawi: Focusing on What, Where, How Much Is Produced and Major Constraints. Agriculture, 11, Article 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020152</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parshotam, A. (2018) Cultivating Smallholder Inclusion in Southern Africa’s Macadamia Nut Value Chains.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sibulali, A. (2020) Market Intelligence Report: Macadamia Nuts Industry. South Africa, Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Elsenburg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howlett, B.G., Nelson, W.R., Pattemore, D.E. and Gee, M. (2015) Pollination of Macadamia: Review and Opportunities for Improving Yields. Scientia Horticulturae, 197, 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.057</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbaka, J.N., Losenge, T., Waiganjo, M.M. and Wamocho, L.S. (2010) Phenotypic variation in Three Phytophthora cinnamomi Populations from Macadamia Growing Areas in Kenya. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 8, 900-911.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njiru, M.M., Mogaka, H.R., Ndirangu, S.N. and Gichimu, B.M. (2021) Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Cultivars of Macadamia (Macadamia spp.) among Small-Scale Farmers in Embu County, Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 25, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v25i4.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murioga, W.M. (2018) Assessment of Efficiency of Agro Food Marketing Systems: A Case of Macadamia Nuts Value Chain in the Central Kenya Highlands. Doctoral Dissertation, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, 1-218.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitalyi, A., Wambugu, R.O. and Kimaro, D. (2013) FAO Characterisation of Global Heritage Agroforestry Systems in Tanzania and Kenya. Agroforestry and Development Alternatives (AFOREDA), Tanzania. FAO, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tavares, J.M., Villalobos, E.M. and Wright, M.G. (2015) Contribution of Insect Pollination to Macadamia integrifolia Production in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 47, 35-49. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/38671</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">da Silva Santos, R., de Oliveira, Milfont, M., Silva, M.M., Carneiro, L.T. and Castro, C.C. (2020) Butterflies Provide Pollination Services to Macadamia in Northeastern Brazil. Scientia Horticulturae, 259, Article ID: 108818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108818</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grass, I., Meyer, S., Taylor, P.J., Foord, S.H., Hajek, P. and Tscharntke, T. (2018) Pollination Limitation despite Managed Honeybees in South African Macadamia Orchards. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 260, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howlett, B.G., Read, S.F.J., A. lavi, M., Cutting, B.T., Nelson, W.R., Goodwin, R.M., Cross, S., Thorp, T.G. and Pattemore, D.E. (2019) Cross-Pollination Enhances Macadamia Yields, Even with Branch-Level Resource Limitation. HortScience, 54, 609-615. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13329-18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heard, T.A. (1993) Pollinator Requirements and Flowering Patterns of Macadamia integrifolia. Australian Journal of Botany, 41, 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9930491</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olesen, T., Huett, D. and Smith, G. (2011) The Production of Flowers, Fruit and Leafy Shoots in Pruned Macadamia Trees. Functional Plant Biology, 38, 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilkie, J.D., Sedgley, M., Morris, S., Muldoon, S. and Olesen, T. (2009) Characteristics of Flowering Stems and Raceme Position in Macadamia. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 84, 387-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2009.11512537</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sedgley, M. and Griffin, A.R. (2013) Sexual Reproduction of Tree Crops. Academic Press, Camberidge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tavares, J.M. (2013) Contribution of Insect Pollination to Macadamia integrifolia, Coffea arabica, and Dimocarpus longan in Hawai'i. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai'i, Manoa, 101 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/100759</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millar, I.M., Uys, V.M. and Urban, R.P. (1999) Collecting and Preserving Insects and Arachnids. SAFRINET, the Southern African. ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute, Stellenbosch. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Collecting+and+Preserving+Insects+and+Arachnids.+A+Manual+for+Entomology+and+Arachnology.+Ultra+Litho+(Pty)+Ltd.&amp;publication_year=2000&amp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larsen, T.B. (1991) The Butterflies of Kenya and Their Natural History. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michener, C.D. (2000) The Bees of the World (Vol. 1). J.H.U. Press, Baltimore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eardley, C., Kuhlmann, M. and Pauly, A. (2010) The Bee Genera and Subgenera of Sub-Saharan Africa (145). Belgian Development Cooperation, Brussels.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cumming, J.M., Wood, D.M., Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. and Sinclair, B.J. (2017) Manual of Afrotropical Diptera. Diversity of Life, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, Vol. 1, 89-133.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R Development Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toti, D.S., Coyle, F.A. and Miller, J.A. (2000) A Structured Inventory of Appalachian Grass Bald and Heath Bald Spider Assemblages and a Test of Species Richness Estimator Performance. The Journal of Arachnology, 28, 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202(2000)028[0329:ASIOAG]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walther, B.A. and Moore, J.L. (2005) The Concepts of Bias, Precision and Accuracy, and Their Use in Testing the Performance of Species Richness Estimators, with a Literature Review of Estimator Performance. Ecography, 28, 815-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04112.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crawley, M.J. (2012) The R Book. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118448908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garibaldi, L.A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Winfree, R, Aizen, M.A., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., Carvalheiro, L.G., Harder, L.D., Afik, O. and Bartomeus, I. (2013) Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance. Science, 339, 1608-1611. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grab, H., Blitzer, E.J., Danforth, B., Loeb, G. and Poveda, K. (2017) Temporally Dependent Pollinator Competition and Facilitation with Mass Flowering Crops Affects Yield in Co-Blooming Crops. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 45296. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45296</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heard, T.A. and Exley, E.M. (1994) Diversity, Abundance, and Distribution of Insect Visitors to Macadamia Flowers. Environmental Entomology, 23, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/23.1.91</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eardley, C.D., Gikungu, M. and Schwarz, M.P. (2009) Bee Conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar: Diversity, Status and Threats. Apidologie, 40, 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carr-Markell, M.K., Demler, C.M., Couvillon, M.J., Schürch, R. and Spivak, M. (2020) Do Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Foragers Recruit Their Nestmates to Native Forbs in Reconstructed Prairie Habitats? PLOS ONE, 15, e0228169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grüter, C. and Hayes, L. (2022) Sociality Is a Key Driver of Foraging Ranges in Bees. Current Biology, 32, 5390-5397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rogers, S.R., Cajamarca, P., Tarpy, D.R. and Burrack, H.J. (2013) Honey Bees and Bumble Bees Respond Differently to Inter- and Intra-Specific Encounters. Apidologie, 44, 621-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-013-0210-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cane, J.H. and Tepedino, V.J. (2017) Gauging the Effect of Honey Bee Pollen Collection on Native Bee Communities. Conservation Letters, 10, 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12263</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prendergast, K.S., Dixon, K.W. and Bateman, P.W. (2021) Interactions between the Introduced European Honey Bee and Native Bees in Urban Areas Varies by Year, Habitat Type and Native Bee Guild. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 133, 725-743. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evans, L.J., Jesson, L., Read, S.F.J., Jochym, M., Cutting, B.T., Gayrard, T., Jammes, M.A.S., Roumier, R. and Howlett, B.G. (2021) Key Factors Influencing Forager Distribution across Macadamia Orchards Differ among Species of Managed Bees. Basic and Applied Ecology, 53, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.03.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heard, T.A. (1994) Behaviour and Pollinator Efficiency of Stingless Bees and Honey Bees on Macadamia Flowers. Journal of Apicultural Research, 33, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1994.11100870</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fründ, J., Dormann, C.F., Holzschuh, A. and Tscharntke, T. (2013) Bee Diversity Effects on Pollination Depend on Functional Complementarity and Niche Shifts. Ecology, 94, 2042-2054. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1620.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martins, K.T., Gonzalez, A. and Lechowicz, M.J. (2015) Pollination Services Are Mediated by Bee Functional Diversity and Landscape Context. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 200, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cook, D.F., Voss, S.C., Finch, J.T., Rader, R.C., Cook, J.M. and Spurr, C.J. (2020) The Role of Flies as Pollinators of Horticultural Crops: An Australian Case Study with Worldwide Relevance. Insects, 11, Article 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huda, A.N., Salmah, M.R., Hassan, A.A., Hamdan, A. and Razak, M.N. (2015) Pollination Services of Mango Flower Pollinators. Journal of Insect Science, 15, Article No. 113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev090</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ireland, S. and Turner, B. (2006) The Effects of Larval Crowding and Food Type on the Size and Development of the Blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria. Forensic Science International, 159, 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.07.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stavert, J.R., Li&amp;ntilde;án-Cembrano, G., Beggs, J.R., Howlett, B.G., Pattemore, D.E. and Bartomeus, I. (2016) Hairiness: The Missing Link between Pollinators and Pollination. PeerJ, 4, e2779. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2779</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rader, R., Reilly, J., Bartomeus, I. and Winfree, R. (2013) Native Bees Buffer the Negative Impact of Climate Warming on Honey Bee Pollination of Watermelon Crops. Global Change Biology, 19, 3103-3110. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12264</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raguso, R.A. (2020) Don’t Forget the Flies: Dipteran Diversity and Its Consequences for Floral Ecology and Evolution. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 55, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-020-00668-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ghazanfar</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Malik M.F.</surname><given-names> Hussain</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> M.</surname><given-names> Iqbal</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> R. and Younas</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Butterflies and Their Contribution in Ecosystem: A Review</article-title><source> Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 115</fpage>-<lpage>118</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cruden, R.W. and Hermann-Parker, S.M. (1979) Butterfly Pollination of Caesalpinia pulcherrima, with Observations on a Psychophilous Syndrome. The Journal of Ecology, 67, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259342</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martins, D.J. (2015) Butterfly Pollination of the Dryland Wildflower Gloriosa Minor. Journal of East African Natural History, 103, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.2982/028.103.0103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carvalheiro, L.G., Seymour, C.L., Veldtman, R. and Nicolson, S.W. (2010) Pollination Services Decline with Distance from Natural Habitat Even in Biodiversity-Rich Areas. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 810-820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01829.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Freitas, A.V., Santos, J.P., Rosa, A.H., Iserhard, C.A., Richter, A., Siewert, R.R., Gueratto, P.E., Carreira, J.Y. and Loureno, G.M. (2021) Sampling Methods for Butterflies (Lepidoptera). In: Santos, J.C. and Fernandes, G.W., Eds., Measuring Arthropod Biodiversity: A Handbook of Sampling Methods, Springer, Berlin, 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53226-0_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thompson, G.G., Withers, P.C., Pianka, E.R. and Thompson, S.A. (2003) Assessing Biodiversity with Species Accumulation Curves; Inventories of Small Reptiles by Pit-Trapping in Western Australia. Austral Ecology, 28, 361-383. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01295.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Summerville, K.S. and Crist, T.O. (2005) Temporal Patterns of Species Accumulation in a Survey of Lepidoptera in a Beech-Maple Forest. Biodiversity &amp; Conservation, 14, 3393-3406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0546-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127547-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fattorini, S. (2013) Regional Insect Inventories Require Long Time, Extensive Spatial Sampling and Good Will. PLOS ONE, 8, e62118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062118</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>