<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2023.149085</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-127520</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Characterization of Seed Storage Proteins in Eight Bambara Groundnut Landraces in Burkina Faso
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Assita</surname><given-names>Traoré-Barro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Emmanuel</surname><given-names>A. M. Thiombiano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Karidiatou</surname><given-names>Gnankambary</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mounyratou</surname><given-names>Rabo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Orokia</surname><given-names>Coulibaly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salimata</surname><given-names>Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oumar</surname><given-names>Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Génétique et amélioration des plantes (LAGAMEP), Institut de l’Environnement et Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire National de Biosécurité, Agence Nationale de Biosécurité, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Laboratoire de protection et défense des cultures (LAPRODEC), Institut de l’Environnement et Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Biochimie et de Chimie Appliquée, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1268</fpage><lpage>1276</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Bambara groundnut 
  <em>Vigna subterranea</em> (L.) Verdc. is a drought-resistant indigenous African grain legume with significant nutritional and agronomic potential. This study aimed to characterize the seed storage proteins of eight Bambara groundnut landraces. Seeds of Bambara groundnut landraces were collected from local markets in Burkina Faso, and total soluble protein as well as protein fractions were extracted. Crude protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method, and soluble proteins were quantified using Bradford dye binding assay. The average crude protein content of the seeds was found to be 18.46%, with variations ranging from 17.69% to 19.17% among the different landraces. Most of the protein content was soluble, constituting approximately 87.04% of the total crude protein. Albumin fraction was the most dominant, representing about 95.42% of the total soluble proteins. The globulin, prolamin and glutelin fractions accounted for 1.82%, 0.13% and 1.17% of the soluble proteins, respectively. The findings provide valuable insights into the protein composition of Bambara groundnut landraces and contribute to our understanding of its nutritional potential, laying the groundwork for further research on crop improvement and sustainable agriculture practices.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bambara Groundnut</kwd><kwd> Landraces</kwd><kwd> Protein</kwd><kwd> Protein Fractions</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) is an indigenous African grain legume that belongs to the Fabaceae family. It is grown in many African countries and other regions of the world, including India, Southeast Asia, and South America [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref1">1</xref>] . It is reported to be drought-resistant and more resilient to climate change than other legume crops, particularly cowpeas and soybeans. Bambara groundnut is used as both food and feed, particularly in poultry, rabbit, and pig farms. The protein content of seeds may vary from one variety to another, and values between 14% and 24% have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref3">3</xref>] . The seeds also contain appreciable amounts of carbohydrates (up to 64%), low quantities of lipids (4.2% - 8.8%), 5.5% fiber, and minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) statistics for 2021, Burkina Faso is the largest producer of Bambara groundnut, with approximately 66,000 tons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref6">6</xref>] . However, this production is far below that of cowpea (705,800 tons) and groundnut (264,000 tons). In addition, the yields remain quite low (approximately 0.6 ton/ha) despite the high potential of 3 ton/ha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref7">7</xref>] . The low productivity and hard-to-cook features of Bambara groundnut grains underutilized the crop. Several traits, including genetic potential and agronomic and nutritional importance, have not yet been fully investigated. As a result, most germplasms planted by farmers are landraces, where seeds are purchased in the local market at the beginning of the rainy season. These landraces display high genetic variability, reflected in the morphology and color of the seeds and nutritional traits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Nutritional interest in leguminous crops is primarily due to their high protein content. The protein content in Bambara groundnut varies between 9.6% and 40%, a very large variation due to cultivar, growing conditions, and possibly the analytical methods used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref4">4</xref>] . This study aimed to characterize seed storage proteins in Bambara groundnut landraces grown in the dry savannahs of Burkina Faso.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material</title><p>Bambara groundnut landraces were collected from local markets at two locations. Six originated from Bobo-Dioulasso (11.176634 latitude, −4.283333 longitude) and two from Ouagadougou (12.368430 latitude, −1.470848 longitude). Landraces were distinguished according to seed coat and eye color (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Landraces L1 and L8 were black and cream, respectively with no pronounced hilum. Landraces L2 and L7 were both cream with black and grey hilum, respectively. Seed coat of landrace L3 was maroon with grey speckles whereas landrace L4 was predominantly cream with maroon speckles. Landraces L5 and L6 seed coat colored in maroon and black, respectively with cream color at the center. Some seed lots consisted of a mixture of two or three landraces. In such cases, landraces were sorted before testing.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Total Seed Proteins Extraction and Quantification</title><p>Seeds (~10% humidity) were ground in a coffee grinder, and the resulting floor was sieved through a 75 &#181;m sieve. Crude protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref8">8</xref>] using an automatic protein analyzer UDK159 (Velp Scientifica, Italy) and a conversion factor of N &#215; 6.25. Total soluble proteins were extracted by dispersing 1 g of the floor in 10 mL of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The mixture was agitated for 30 min at room temperature and centrifuged at 10,000&#215; g for 10 min. Soluble proteins in the supernatants were quantified using Bradford dye binding assay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref11">11</xref>] . Bovine serum albumin was used as a reference protein, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm and 590 nm instead of 595 nm wavelength only for the linearization of the calibration curves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Fractionation of Seed Proteins</title><p>Seed protein fractions were extracted sequentially according to their differential solubilities, using the technique described by Ragab et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref13">13</xref>] . Sequential fractions, including albumins, globulins, prolamins, and glutelins, were extracted using distilled water, 1 M NaCl, 70% (v/v) ethanol, and 0.2% NaOH, respectively. For the albumin fraction, seed flour (3.5 g) was dispersed in 50 mL of distilled water, vortexed, and agitated at room temperature for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 &#215;g for 10 min. The pellet was extracted once more and the supernatants from the two extractions were pooled. The subsequent protein fractions were extracted in the same manner. In an additional experiment, the globulin fraction was extracted in 0.1 M sodium phosphate (Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>) to test the efficacy of this solvent compared to 1 M NaCl [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref14">14</xref>] . Protein fractions were quantified using Bradford’s dye-binding assay, as described for the total soluble protein extract.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analyses</title><p>Absorbance readings were recorded, and Bradford assay calibration curves were constructed using Microsoft Excel. All statistical analyses were performed using R software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref15">15</xref>] . Assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance of data on protein content were checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test (p &gt; 0.05) and Levene’s test (p &gt; 0.05), respectively. The mean protein content was compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.05), and Fisher’s LSD (p &lt; 0.05) was used for post-hoc tests.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Total Crude Protein Contents</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the crude protein content of the seeds of the eight Bambara groundnut landraces. The protein content (%) varied between 17.69 &#177; 0.27 and 19.17 &#177; 0.03 with a mean of 18.46 &#177; 0.13. Despite the narrow range in protein content, statistical analyses showed significant differences among the eight Bambara groundnut landraces (F7,16 = 31.6, p &lt; 0.001). The highest protein contents were found in landraces LR1 (18.93 &#177; 0.07) and LR6 (19.17 &#177; 0.03). Landraces LR2 and LR8 showed the lowest protein contents which were not significantly different (p = 0.392).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Total Soluble Protein Content</title><p>Soluble and insoluble protein contents in Bambara groundnut seeds, expressed as percentages of the total crude protein content, are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The average soluble protein content was 87.04% of the total crude protein, whereas 12.96% accounted for insoluble proteins and non-protein nitrogen. The lowest and highest soluble protein contents were found in landrace L3 (76.51%) and L2 (95.65%), respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of Globulins Extraction Buffer</title><p>Globulin fractions extracted with sodium phosphate and sodium chloride are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The average protein content (%) in the sodium phosphate fraction was 1.58 &#177; 0.09 while sodium chloride yielded 0.33 &#177; 0.05. Two-way ANOVA indicated that extraction with sodium phosphate yielded significantly higher protein content regardless of landrace (F1,119 = 6833.06, p &lt; 0.0001). However, both extraction solutions showed similar patterns of variation in protein content between the landraces. Statistical analyses also revealed highly significant differences in globulin content between landraces (F7,119 = 71.53, p &lt; 0.0001). The highest globulin content (1.94%) was recorded in landrace L5 whereas the lowest content was found in landrace L8.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Protein Fractions</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes the total soluble protein content and sequentially extracted protein fractions. Total soluble protein extracted in sodium phosphate buffer varied in a narrow range from 14.26% (g of protein/100g of seed floor) to 17.04% with an average protein content of 16.05%. Statistical analyses of protein content showed that only landrace L3 (14.26% protein content) differed significantly from the other landraces. On average, the albumin fraction represented 95.42% of the total soluble protein content. The globulin, prolamin and glutelin fractions represented only 1.82%, 0.13% and 1.17%, respectively. The protein recovery rate was calculated by adding the four fractions. In most landraces, the protein recovery rates were approximately 100%. However, the protein recovery rate was significantly lower for landrace L2 (79.3%).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Determination of the crude protein content (%) in the seed flour of eight Bambara groundnut landraces revealed that it ranged from 17.69 &#177; 0.27 to 19.17 &#177; 0.03).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Total soluble protein (% seed flour) and protein fractions (% total soluble protein) in Bambara groundnut landraces</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Landrace</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soluble protein</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Albumin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Globulin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prolamin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glutelin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Recovery</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.15 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.37 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.73 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.04 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.29 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.26 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.32 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.73 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.88 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.85 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.79 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.82 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.42 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.27 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.17 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.24 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13 bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.39 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.89 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.95 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.74 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.96 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.19 a</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same letter(s) within each column are not significantly different.</p><p>Several studies determined the protein content in Bambara groundnut. Doku et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref16">16</xref>] found 17% - 20% crude protein in Bambara groundnut landraces from Ghana. Ranges of 14% - 24% and 15% - 25% were also reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref18">18</xref>] . Slightly higher protein contents of 26% - 27% were found in some South African landraces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref19">19</xref>] . Overall, our data are consistent with the results presented in previous studies. The narrow range in protein content suggested that Bambara groundnut landraces may share close genetic backgrounds. It is expected that wider protein content range may be found when extending the study to other landraces in the country. This is exemplified by the 17.4% - 23.5% range found in a set of landraces by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref20">20</xref>] as compared to the 17% - 20% range found in previous set of landraces originating from the same country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>The total protein content in Bambara groundnut seeds were analyzed regarding both soluble and insoluble components, expressed as percentages of total crude protein content. The total soluble part of the crude protein content was high in most landraces, indicating the efficacy of sodium phosphate buffer to solubilize Bambara groundnut seed proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref10">10</xref>] . Insoluble protein portions in most landraces were roughly similar to that reported earlier in Bambara groundnut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref22">22</xref>] and in cowpea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Several studies made use of the differential solubility of seed proteins to sequentially extract albumin, globulin, prolamin and glutelin fractions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref24">24</xref>] . Usually, the globulin fraction was extracted with a solution of sodium chloride. However in a study comparing different solvents, 0.1 M sodium phosphate dibasic was found to be the best solvent for extracting globulins from amaranth seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref14">14</xref>] . The use of sodium phosphate for Bambara groundnut seeds in this study gave similar results. This solvent clearly outperformed the sodium chloride solution which was no longer used in subsequent extractions.</p><p>The distribution of protein fractions within the total soluble protein indicated that the albumin fraction dominated, representing approximately 95.42% of the total soluble proteins. This observation is consistent with previous studies, where albumin has been reported as the major protein component in many plant seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref20">20</xref>] . Additionally, the pattern of non-albumin soluble protein showed similar levels of globulin and glutelin, and the lowest prolamin content. Such a pattern was also observed in cowpea and Bambara groundnut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127520-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study provides valuable insights into the protein composition of Bambara groundnut landraces grown in the dry savannahs of Burkina Faso. The protein content of the seeds ranged from 17.69% to 19.17%, with slight variations among the different landraces. The high protein content and predominance of albumins in the total soluble protein fraction make Bambara groundnut a promising crop for enhancing nutritional security, particularly in regions prone to climate change and food insecurity. Future studies encompassing a broader range of landraces from various regions may reveal wider diversity in protein content. Overall, this study contributes to the knowledge of the nutritional potential of Bambara groundnut as a protein-rich crop and underscores the importance of further exploration of this underutilized crop for food and feed.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the contribution of the Union Economique et Mon&#233;taire Ouest Africaine (UEMOA)/West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) for providing valuable laboratory equipment necessary for this work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Traor&#233;-Barro, A., Thiombiano, E.A.M., Gnankambary, K., Rabo, M., Coulibaly, O., Traor&#233;, S. and Traor&#233;, O. (2023) Characterization of Seed Storage Proteins in Eight Bambara Groundnut Landraces in Burkina Faso. Agricultural Sciences, 14, 1268-1276. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.149085</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127520-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okonkwo, S.I. and Opara, M.F. (2010) The Analysis of Bambara Nut (Voandzeia subterranea (L.) thouars) for Sustainability in Africa. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 394-396. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjasci.2010.394.396</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adebowale, Y.A., Schwarzenbolz, U. and Henle, T. (2011) Isolates from Bambara Groundnut (Voandzeia Subterranean L.): Chemical Characterization and Functional Properties. International Journal of Food Properties, 14, 758-775. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910903420743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azman-Halimi, R., Barkla, B.J., Mayes, S. and King, G.J. (2019) The Potential of the Underutilized Pulse Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) for Nutritional Food Security. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 77, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tan, X.L., Azam-Ali, S., Goh, E.V., Mustafa, M., Chai, H.H., Ho, W.K., Mayes, S., Mabhaudhi, T., Azam-Ali, S. and Massawe, F. (2020) Bambara Groundnut: An Underutilized Leguminous Crop for Global Food Security and Nutrition. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, Article 601496. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.601496</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azman-Halimi, R., Raymond, C.A., Barkla, B.J., Mayes, S. and King, G.J. (2022) Development of Selection Indices for Improvement of Seed Yield and Lipid Composition in Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). Foods, 11, Article No. 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAOSTAT (2023) Agricultural Production, Crop Primary Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azam-Ali, S.N., Sesay, A., Karikari, S.K., Massawe, F.J., Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Bannayan, M. and Hampson, K.J. (2001) Assessing the Potential of an Underutilized Crop—A Case Study Using Bambara Groundnut. Experimental Agriculture, 37, 433-472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479701000412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th Edition, AOAC, Gaithersburg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hameed, A., Shah, T.M., Atta, B.M., Iqbal, N., Haq, M.A. and Ali, H. (2009) Comparative Seed Storage Protein Profiling of Kabuli Chickpea Genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41, 703-710.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saminu, N.M. and Muhammad, Y.Y. (2021) Seed Storage Protein Changes and Mobilization Pattern in Bambaranut (Vigna subterranea) (L.) Verdc. during Germination. Plant Science Today, 8, 1049-1056. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2021.8.4.1257</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bradford, M.M. (1976) A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ernst, O. and Zor, T. (2010) Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 38, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3791/1918-v</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ragab, D.M., Babiker, E.E. and Eltinay, A.H. (2004) Fractionation, Solubility and Functional Properties of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Proteins as Affected by pH and/or Salt Concentration. Food Chemistry, 84, 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00203-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodríguez, P., Pérez, E., Romel, G. and Dufour, D. (2011) Characterization of the Proteins Fractions Extracted from Leaves of Amaranthus dubius (Amaranthus spp.). African Journal of Food Science, 5, 417-424.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doku, E.V., Hammonds, T.W. and Francis, B.J. (1978) On the Composition of Ghanaian Bambara Groundnuts (Voandzeia subterranea Thouars). Tropical Science, 20, 263-269.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hillocks, R.J., Bennett, C. and Mponda, O.M. (2012) Bambara Nut: A Review of Utilisation, Market Potential and Crop Improvement. African Crop Science Journal, 20, 1-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murevanhema, Y.Y. and Jideani, V.A. (2013) Potential of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc) Milk as a Probiotic Beverage—A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 53, 954-967. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.574803</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arise, A.K., Amonsou, E.O. and Ijabadeniyi, O.A. (2015) Influence of Extraction Methods on Functional Properties of Protein Concentrates Prepared from South African Bambara Groundnut Landraces. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50, 1095-1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12746</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poulter, N.H. (1981) Properties of Some Protein Fractions from Bambara Groundnut [Voandzeia subterranea (L.) Thouars]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 32, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740320108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doku, E.V., Hammonds, T.W. and Francis, B.J. (1978) On the Composition of Ghanaian Bambara Groundnuts (Voandzeia subterranea Thouars). Tropical Science, 20, 263-269.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yagoub, A.A.E.-G. and Abdalla, A.A. (2007) Effect of Domestic Processing Methods on Chemical Composition, in Vitro Digestibility of Protein and Starch and Functional Properties of Bambara Groundnut (Voandzeia subterranea) Seed. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 3, 24-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teka, T.A., Retta, N., Bultosa, G., Admassu, H. and Astatkie, T. (2020) Protein Fractions, in Vitro Protein Digestibility and Amino Acid Composition of Select Cowpea Varieties Grown in Ethiopia. Food Bioscience, 36, Article ID: 100634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100634</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127520-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vasconcelos, I.M., Maia, F.M.M., Farias, D.F., Campello, C.C., Carvalho, A.F.U., de Azevedo Moreira, R. and Abreu de Oliveira, J.T. (2010) Protein Fractions, Amino Acid Composition and Antinutritional Constituents of High-Yielding Cowpea Cultivars. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2009.05.008</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>