<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Materials Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-117X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msa.2023.149030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSA-127517</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Numerical Simulation for Enhancing Performance of MoS&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Hetero-Junction Solar Cell Employing Cu&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O as Hole Transport Layer
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Ferdous Wahid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ushna</surname><given-names>Das</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bidesh</surname><given-names>Kumer Paul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shuvo</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Nuralam Howlader</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Sazedur Rahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>458</fpage><lpage>472</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The paper reported the design and thorough analysis of a thin-film solar cell (TFSC) based on molybdenum disulfide (MoS
  <sub>2</sub>) with an integrated Copper(I) Oxide (Cu
  <sub>2</sub>O) hole transport layer (HTL), employing the one-dimensional Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator (SCAPS-1D) software. By varying crucial parameters such as absorber layer thickness, doping density, and bulk defect density, as well as HTL thickness, doping concentration, and electron affinity, defect density at ZnO/absorber and absorber/Cu
  <sub>2</sub>O interfaces, and operating temperature, we explored key photovoltaic measures including open circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (Jsc), fill-factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the hetero-junction solar cell. The study demonstrated an efficiency of 18.87% for the MoS
  <sub>2</sub> solar cell without HTL, while the proposed solar cell (SC) utilizing Cu
  <sub>2</sub>O HTL and optimized device structure exhibited a remarkable PCE of 26.70%. The outcomes derived from the present study offer valuable insights for the progress of a highly efficient and economically viable MoS
  <sub>2</sub> hetero-junction TFSC.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Solar Cell</kwd><kwd> Thin Film</kwd><kwd> SCAPS-1D</kwd><kwd> Hetero-Junction</kwd><kwd> HTL</kwd><kwd> Defect Density</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The rise of the population, urbanization, technological progresses, and the evolving lifestyles are all prophesied to cause a colossal surge in global energy demand in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, it is expected that the energy demand will reach to 30 terawatts (TW) by 2050 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref1">1</xref>] . Currently, a large portion of energy demands are satisfied by the utilization of fossil fuels; nevertheless, this limited resource is approaching a state of exhaustion. Furthermore, the widespread use of fossil fuels is resulting in adverse consequences for the environment, hence necessitating a concerted effort to prioritize the advancement of sustainable and renewable energy alternatives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref2">2</xref>] . To mitigate climate change and foster a more environmentally sustainable future for next generations, renewable energy sources including solar, wind, hydropower, biomass, and geothermal needs to be exploited in place of fossil fuels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref3">3</xref>] . Solar energy has emerged as a highly promising alternative in the ongoing efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and address the challenges posed by climate change. It is a plentiful and sustainable form of energy that is harnessed by utilizing SCs to directly convert sunlight into electrical energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Thin film solar cells have garnered significant attention in the field of photovoltaic technology due to their cost-effectiveness, ease of manufacture and greater efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref6">6</xref>] . Amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) are the three most popular TFSC technologies, with PCE of 9.13%, 20.77%, and 23.03%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref7">7</xref>] . Presently, there is a significant research focus on transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) materials as promising semiconductors for TFSC. This interest stems from their exceptional energy gap, satisfactory carrier transport properties, and captivating optical absorption characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref9">9</xref>] . TMD compounds, specifically MoS<sub>2</sub> have garnered significant attention due to its remarkable light absorption coefficient surpassing 10<sup>5</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>, ideal band gap of 1.29 eV, relatively high carrier mobility, eco-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and abundance in the Earth’s crust [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref10">10</xref>] . The MoS<sub>2</sub>-based SC (ITO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Au) exhibited experimental PCE of merely 0.7% with a 110 nm absorber layer thickness and 1.8% with a 220 nm absorber layer thickness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref11">11</xref>] . With a PCE of 19.62%, the SC configuration comprising ZnO/CdS/MoS<sub>2</sub> exhibited exceptional performance, thus highlighting the suitability of MoS<sub>2</sub> as a highly effective absorber layer for SCs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref12">12</xref>] . The optimized ITO/ZnSe/MoS<sub>2</sub> SC exhibited a theoretical maximum efficiency of 19.48%, while the addition of SnS as HTL to the structure (ITO/ZnSe/MoS<sub>2</sub>/SnS), increased the theoretical maximum efficiency to 21.39%. Valance band offset at the HTL/absorber interface significantly improves PCE of SC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref13">13</xref>] . Thus, in order to design a highly efficient MoS<sub>2</sub> TFSC, a suitable HTL material with enhanced electrical and optical properties is indispensable. Several inorganic materials, including Cu<sub>2</sub>O, CuSCN, CuI, and NiO, have shown promising use as HTL in various organic and inorganic solar cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref15">15</xref>] . Among these options, Cu<sub>2</sub>O is a promising material for fulfilling HTL roles due to its indirect bandgap (2.1 - 2.6 eV), electron affinity (3.4 eV), abundance, environmental advantages, and synthesis practicality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref16">16</xref>] . The effective extraction of holes is made possible by the synergy between high hole-mobility and precisely matched band alignment with MoS<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>Therefore, this paper proposed a novel design of a MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC employing Cu<sub>2</sub>O as HTL with the structure Al/ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O/Ni. The proposed SC has been designed and examined using SCAPS-1D. The widespread adoption and utilization of SCAPS-1D in the domain of SC numerical simulations can be attributed to its unique combination of open-source nature, versatility, user-friendliness, accuracy, and the active support from its community of users and developers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref10">10</xref>] . The numerical calculations revealed that this new design resulted in a substantial improvement in SC performance. This study explores the utilization of Cu<sub>2</sub>O as HTL to enhance device performance, reaching a maximum efficiency of 26.70% with Voc is 1.089 V, Jsc is 30.33 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, FF is 80.85% whereas without HTL the maximum efficiency of 18.87% with Voc is 0.9425 V, Jsc is 25.41 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, FF is 78.79%. Additionally, we delve into the impacts of altering the thickness of the absorber layer and HTL, alongside varying the doping concentration and defect density of the absorber layer, the doping concentration and electron affinity of HTL, interface defect density, and temperature. The ultimate goal is to attain enhanced efficiency through careful examination of these factors.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Device Architecture and Material Parameters</title><p>The SCAPS-1D, Version 3.9 software was utilized for the design and performance analysis of the proposed Al/ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O/Ni SC configuration. The Department of Electronics and Information Systems at the University of Ghent, Belgium, has developed a sophisticated software that meticulously analyzes the electrostatic potential and behavior of free carriers within the solar cell. This software achieves its insights by skillfully incorporating continuity equations and the Poisson equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref17">17</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) illustrates the schematic diagram of the hetero-junction structure used in the simulation. The SC comprises a p-MoS<sub>2</sub> absorber layer, an n-ZrS<sub>2</sub> (Zirconium disulfide) window layer, an n-ZnO electron transport layer (ETL), and a Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL. In this design, Al is utilized as the front contact material, while Ni functions as the back contact material, forming a well-structured device for efficient solar energy conversion. ZrS<sub>2</sub> used as window layer, a type of TMDCs, is one of the most promising photovoltaic materials due to its high absorption coefficient and variable bandgap energy of 1.2 - 2.2 eV, allowing for successful energy conversion and device engineering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref18">18</xref>] . ZnO is used as ETL because to its cost-effectiveness, physical and chemical stability, and non-toxicity. The wide bandgap of ZrS<sub>2</sub> (2.0 eV) and ZnO (3.27 eV) play a crucial role in the hetero-junction structure by allowing significant optical throughput. Additionally, the desirable electron affinity of the ZnO (~4.1 eV) ETL enables it to form a suitable junction with MoS<sub>2</sub> absorber layer. Furthermore, Cu<sub>2</sub>O is used as HTL, effectively reducing the recombination loss of photo-generated carriers at the back edge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref20">20</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b) shows the energy band diagram of the reported SC structure. All simulations are conducted at a working temperature of 300 K, with AM 1.5 G light. Leveraging prior research findings, we have integrated experimentally and theoretically derived</p><p>parameters of different layers to optimize the performance of the recently developed MoS<sub>2</sub> SC with Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL. The pertinent physical parameters for each layer have been delineated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Influence of Absorber Layer Thickness and Doping Concentration on PV Parameters</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> demonstrated a comprehensive analysis of photovoltaic (PV) parameters for MoS<sub>2</sub>-based hetero-junction TFSC, considering variations in MoS<sub>2</sub> thickness and acceptor concentration. It is evident from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) that the Voc exhibits minor fluctuations in response to changes in thickness. Moreover, a notable increase in Voc is observed when the acceptor concentration is raised from 10<sup>17</sup> to 10<sup>21</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>, resulting in a rise from 0.96 V to 1.20 V [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Material parameters employed in our simulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref18">18</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZrS<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu<sub>2</sub>O</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness (&#181;m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Band gap, Eg (eV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Electron affinity, χ (eV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Permittivity( Relative), εr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CB density of states, N<sub>C</sub> (1/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#215; 10<sup>18</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#215; 10<sup>18</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VB density of states, N<sub>V</sub> (1/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mobility( Electron), &#181;<sub>n</sub> (cm<sup>2</sup>/Vs)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mobility(Hole), &#181;<sub>h</sub> (cm<sup>2</sup>/Vs)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8600</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acceptor density, N<sub>A</sub> (1/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>18</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Donor density, N<sub>D</sub> (1/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>21</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Defect type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neutral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single-Acceptor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single-Donor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neutral</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy distribution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gaussian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gaussian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Defect density, Nt (1/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>15</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Input parameters of interface defect layers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref18">18</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Interface</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Defect type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Capture cross section: Electrons/holes(cm<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Energetic distribution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference for defect energy level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total density (cm<sup>−3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neutral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup> 1 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Above the highest EB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neutral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup> 1 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Above the highest EB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neutral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−18</sup> 1 &#215; 10<sup>−18</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Above the highest EB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) shows that Jsc increases with thickness and acceptor concentration. However, it is noteworthy that the impact of MoS<sub>2</sub> thickness on Jsc is significantly greater, since the increase in thickness is directly related to increased light absorption, which subsequently results in a higher creation of hole-electron pairs. As the acceptor concentration increases, the FF demonstrates an upward trend, whereas the impact of MoS<sub>2</sub> thickness on FF is found to be minimal when the acceptor concentration increases, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c). Finally, the efficiency of the SC exhibits an increase from 20.85% to 24.49% as the thickness of MoS<sub>2</sub> is elevated from 0.4 &#181;m to 1 &#181;m, alongside an increase in the acceptor concentration from 10<sup>17</sup> to 10<sup>21</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d). For the simulation, a thickness of 1 &#181;m for MoS<sub>2</sub> absorber layer and an acceptor concentration of 10<sup>19</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup> were identified as the optimal values.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Impact on PV Parameters Due to Defects in MoS<sub>2</sub> Absorber Layer</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> depicted the dependence of PV performance parameters on absorber defect density, which ranges from 10<sup>12</sup> to 10<sup>16</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>. At a defect density 10<sup>12</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup> the maximum values of Voc Jsc, FF, and efficiency are obtained. As a consequence of Shockley-Read Hall non-radiative recombination, there is a decrease in the minority charge carrier lifetime and an increase in recombination carriers within the absorber layer, leading to a reduction in Voc, FF, and PCE with higher defect density [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref23">23</xref>] . Nonetheless, it is observed that the Jsc remains relatively stable until the defect density reaches 10<sup>15</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>. Beyond this point, Jsc begins to decrease, likely attributed to heightened carrier recombination, which reduces the number of available carriers responsible for generating the short-circuit current. Consequently, the optimal value for the defect density of MoS<sub>2</sub> is 10<sup>14</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of HTL Thickness, Doping Density and Electron Affinity on PV Parameters</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> illustrated the impact of Cu<sub>2</sub>O thickness, doping density, and electron affinity on PV parameters. As depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), the variations in Cu<sub>2</sub>O thickness and doping density do not exhibit a significant effect</p><p>on the PV parameters. However, the electron affinity of Cu<sub>2</sub>O exerts a substantial influence on enhancing the PV parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref24">24</xref>] . Notably, as the electron affinity increases up to 3.4 eV, all PV parameters exhibit a consistent upward trend, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c). The investigation yields the determination of the optimal values for the thickness of the HTL and the doping density, which are found to be 0.4 &#181;m and 10<sup>16</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. Additionally, the electron affinity of the HTL is found to be 3.4 eV, indicating a favorable characteristic for the overall performance of the device.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Influence of Interfacial Defect Density on PV Parameters</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) provide a depiction of the influence of interfacial defect density variations, spanning from 10<sup>10</sup> cm<sup>−2</sup> to 10<sup>18</sup> cm<sup>−2</sup>, at the ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub> and MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O interfaces on PV parameters. As the defect density approaches 10<sup>18</sup> cm<sup>−2</sup>, there is a notable and significant decrease observed in all PV parameters. The presence of trap states at the interface acts as recombination centers, resulting in a reduction in photo-generated carriers and hindering efficient carrier collection. These defects related to interface states significantly diminish the overall performance parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref1">1</xref>] . The value of 10<sup>11</sup> cm<sup>−2</sup> for interfacial defect density has been specified for both interfaces in order to reach a balance on PV characteristics.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Impact of Temperature on PV Parameters</title><p>The assessment of PV parameters, namely Voc, Jsc, PCE, and FF, has been conducted to investigate the impact of temperature fluctuations ranging from 275 K to 475 K, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. It has been apparent that enhancing the operating temperature results in a reduction of the Voc. As temperature increases, the band gap of MoS<sub>2</sub> decreases and the reverse saturation current is enhanced, both of which lead to a decline in Voc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref25">25</xref>] . Conversely, the values of Jsc exhibit a slight increase with elevating operating temperatures, owing to the increase in generation of electron-hole pairs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref27">27</xref>] . The proposed SC has an estimated FF of 80.18% at 275 K and 85.48% at 360 K, after which it declines to 81.84% as the temperature goes up. It is also noticed from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> that PCE of the proposed SC exhibits lower value at high temperature as a consequence of reduced Voc.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Influence of HTL on SC Output Characteristics</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b) present the J-V characteristics and Quantum Efficiency (QE) curves for the optimized designed MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC with and without HTL layer. Through numerical simulation, the values of Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE for the newly designed Al/ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O/Ni hetero-junction SC were estimated to be 1.089 V, 30.33 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, 80.85%, and 26.70%, respectively. In comparison, the Al/ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Ni SC exhibited Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE values of 0.9425 V, 25.41 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, 78.79%, and 18.87%, respectively. Notably, the presence of Cu<sub>2</sub>O in the structure significantly increases the calculated SC parameters compared to the structure without Cu<sub>2</sub>O. The improvement of Voc, Jsc, FF and PCE is due to reduction of dark current for surface recombination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref30">30</xref>] . The MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC without HTL suffers from a high rate of minority carrier recombination, leading to reduced performance parameters, especially a lower Voc value. In contrast to the structure without HTL, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b), the QE with the Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL layer is higher.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Comparative Study</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> presents a comprehensive analysis of MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC architectures that have been examined in previous research studies. The numerical simulations of the MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC with Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL demonstrated superior solar cell performance compared to previous studies. In this study, the advantage of incorporating Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL with MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSCs has been investigated. Cu<sub>2</sub>O and MoS<sub>2</sub> exhibit better energy level alignment which is essential for enhancing the performance of PV parameters.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of proposed optimized SC with the previously reported studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Device Structure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Voc (V)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jsc (mA/cm<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FF (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Efficiency (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ref.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al/ITO/TiO<sub>2</sub>/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref1">1</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al/FTO/CdS/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTO/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O/Au</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref12">12</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CdS/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ITO/TiO<sub>2</sub>/CdS/MoS<sub>2</sub>/C/Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127517-ref32">32</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This work</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we have presented an investigation of the MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC structure Al/ZrS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO/MoS<sub>2</sub>/Cu<sub>2</sub>O/Ni. By employing the SCAPS-1D software and conducting numerical calculations, the study demonstrates a significant enhancement in MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC performance with Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL, as compared to MoS<sub>2</sub>-based TFSC without Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL. This study explores the utilization of Cu<sub>2</sub>O HTL, which has demonstrated notable advancements in key SC parameters, reaching a maximum efficiency of 26.70% with Voc of 1.089 V, Jsc of 30.33 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> and FF of 80.85%. HTL foster the effective charge extraction, collection and transport, while also aiding in minimizing charge recombination which in turns significantly enhanced the SC performance. The optimal thickness of the MoS<sub>2</sub> absorber is 1 &#181;m with acceptor concentration of 10<sup>19</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup> and defect density 10<sup>14</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>. Furthermore, the MoS<sub>2</sub>/ZnO and Cu<sub>2</sub>O/MoS<sub>2</sub> interface defects were estimated to be 10<sup>11</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>. In future, density functional theory can be used to explain the optoelectronic properties of MoS<sub>2</sub> absorber.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The University of Gent’s Prof. Marc Burgelman and his colleagues kindly provided the SCAPS-1D software that is discussed in this article, and the authors are appreciative of their assistance.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wahid, M.F., Das, U., Paul, B.K., Paul, S., Howlader, M.N. and Rahman, M.S. (2023) Numerical Simulation for Enhancing Performance of MoS<sub>2</sub> Hetero-Junction Solar Cell Employing Cu<sub>2</sub>O as Hole Transport Layer. Materials Sciences and Applications, 14, 458-472. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2023.149030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127517-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, M.H., Al Mamun, M.A., Haque, M.D., Rahman, M.F., Hossain, M.K. and Touhidul Islam, A.Z.M. (2023) Performance Enhancement of an MoS2-Based Heterojunction Solar Cell with an In2Te3 Back Surface Field: A Numerical Simulation Approach. ACS Omega, 8, 7017-7029. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07846</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patel, P.K. (2021) Device Simulation of Highly Efficient Eco-Friendly CH3NH3SnI3 Perovskite Solar Cell. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 3082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82817-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nsafon, B.E.K., Owolabi, A.B., Butu, H.M., Roh, J.W., Suh, D. and Huh, J.S. (2020) Optimization and Sustainability Analysis of PV/Wind/Diesel Hybrid Energy System for Decentralized Energy Generation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 32, Article ID: 100570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100570</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naveen, S., Aravind, S., Yamini, B., Vasudhareni, R., Gopinath, K.P., Arun, J. and Pugazhendhi, A. (2023) A Review on Solar Energy Intensified Biomass Valorization and Value-Added Products Production: Practicability, Challenges, Techno Economic and Lifecycle Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, Article ID: 137028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paraschiv, L.S. and Paraschiv, S. (2023) Contribution of Renewable Energy (Hydro, Wind, Solar and Biomass) to Decarbonization and Transformation of the Electricity Generation Sector for Sustainable Development. Energy Reports, 9, 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jha, V., Dasgupta, S. and Ganguly, A. (2023) Study of PbS Nanomaterial Sensitized ZnO Based Solar Cell Using SCAPS-1D Simulator. 2023 International Symposium on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ISDCS), Higashihiroshima, 29-31 May 2023, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDCS58735.2023.10153556</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moon, M.M.A., Rahman, M.F., Hossain, J. and Ismail, A.B.M. (2019) Comparative Study of the Second Generation a-Si:H, CdTe, and CIGS Thin-Film Solar Cells. Advanced Materials Research, 1154, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1154.102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaidi, B., Shekhar, C., Hadjoudja, B., Gagui, S. and Chouial, B. (2019) Optimization of Highly Efficient Monolayer MoSe2 Based Solar Cells. Acta Physica Polonica A, 136, 495-497. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.136.495</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaidi, B., Shekhar, C., Hadjoudja, B., Gagui, S. and Saeed, M.A. (2021) Efficiency Enhancement of Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Based Solar Cells. Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials, 22, 687-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42341-021-00284-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haque, M.D., Ali, M.H., Rahman, M.F. and Islam, A.Z.M.T. (2022) Numerical Analysis for the Efficiency Enhancement of MoS2 Solar Cell: A Simulation Approach by SCAPS-1D. Optical Materials, 131, Article ID: 112678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112678</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsai, M.L., Su, S.H., Chang, J.K., Tsai, D.S., Chen, C.H., Wu, C.I., Li, L.J., Chen, L.J. and He, J.H. (2014) Monolayer MoS2 Heterojunction Solar Cells. ACS Nano, 8, 8317-8322. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn502776h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashid, H., Rahman, K.S., Hossain, M.I., Tabet, N., Alharbi, F.H. and Amin, N. (2014) Prospects of Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) as an Alternative Absorber Layer Material in Thin Film Solar Cells from Numerical Modeling. Chalcogenide Letter, 11, 397-403.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dey, M., Shahriar, M.F., Ali, A., Dey, M. and Das, N.K. (2019) Design and Optimization of an Efficient Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) Solar Cell with Tin Sulfide BSF. 2019 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE), Cox’sBazar, 7-9 February 2019, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECACE.2019.8679178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Casas, G., Cappelletti, M., Cédola, A., Soucase, B.M. and Peltzer y Blancá, E. (2017) Analysis of the Power Conversion Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells with Different Materials as Hole-Transport Layer by Numerical Simulations. Superlattices and Microstructures, 107, 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.04.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, S., Cao, Y.L., Li, W.H. and Bo, Z.S. (2021) A Brief Review of Hole Transporting Materials Commonly Used in Perovskite Solar Cells. Rare Metals, 40, 2712-2729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01691-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Markose, K.K., Shaji, M., Bhatia, S., Nair, P.R., Saji, K.J., Antony, A. and Jayaraj, M.K. (2020) Novel Boron-Doped p-Type Cu2O Thin Films as a Hole-Selective Contact in c-Si Solar Cells. ACS Applied Materials &amp; Interfaces, 12, 12972-12981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b22581</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burgelman, M. and Marlein, J. (2008) Analysis of Graded Band Gap Solar Cells with SCAPS. 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, 1-5 September 2008, 2151-2155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdelfatah, M., El Sayed, A.M., Ismail, W., Ulrich, S., Sittinger, V. and El-Shaer, A. (2023) SCAPS Simulation of Novel Inorganic ZrS2/CuO Heterojunction Solar Cells. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 4553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31553-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shah, D.K., KC, D., Muddassir, M., Akhtar, M.S., Kim, C.Y. and Yang, O.B. (2021) A Simulation Approach for Investigating the Performances of Cadmium Telluride Solar Cells Using Doping Concentrations, Carrier Lifetimes, Thickness of Layers, and Band Gaps. Solar Energy, 216, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doroody, C., Rahman, K.S., Rosly, H.N., Harif, M.N., Haque, F., Tiong, S.K. and Amin, N. (2020) Impact of High Resistivity Transparent (HRT) Layer in Cadmium Telluride Solar Cells from Numerical Simulation. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 12, Article ID: 023702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5132838</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devi, N., Parrey, K.A., Aziz, A. and Datta, S. (2018) Numerical Simulations of Perovskite Thin-Film Solar Cells Using a CdS Hole Blocking Layer. Journal of Vacuum Science &amp; Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, 36, Article ID: 04G105. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5026163</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nalianya, M.A., Awino, C., Barasa, H., Odari, V., Gaitho, F., Omogo, B. and Mageto, M. (2021) Numerical Study of Lead Free CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 Perovskite Solar Cell by SCAPS-1D. Optik, 248, Article ID: 168060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Et-taya, L., Ouslimane, T. and Benami, A. (2020) Numerical Analysis of Earth-Abundant Cu2ZnSn(SxSe1-x)4 Solar Cells Based on Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Results by Using SCAPS-1D. Solar Energy, 201, 827-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kale, A.J., Chaurasiya, R. and Dixit, A. (2021) Inorganic Lead-Free Cs2AuBiCl6 Perovskite Absorber and Cu2O Hole Transport Material Based Single-Junction Solar Cells with 22.18% Power Conversion Efficiency. Advanced Theory and Simulations, 4, Article ID: 2000224. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202000224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khatun, M.M., Sunny, A. and Al Ahmed, S.R. (2021) Numerical Investigation on Performance Improvement of WS2 Thin-Film Solar Cell with Copper Iodide as Hole Transport Layer. Solar Energy, 224, 956-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, A. and Zhu, K. (2012) Computer Simulation of a-Si/c-Si Heterojunction Solar Cell with High Conversion Efficiency. Solar Energy, 86, 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.10.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalmageed, H.I., Fedawy, M. and Aly, M.H. (2021) Effect of Absorber Layer Bandgap of CIGS-Based Solar Cell with (CdS/ZnS) Buffer Layer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2128, Article ID: 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2128/1/012009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taguchi, M., Terakawa, A., Maruyama, E. and Tanaka, M. (2005) Obtaining a Higher Voc in HIT Cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 13, 481-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.646</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glunz, S.W., Biro, D., Rein, S. and Warta, W. (1999) Field-Effect Passivation of the SiO2Si Interface. Journal of Applied Physics, 86, 683-691. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.370784</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atowar Rahman, M. (2021) Enhancing the Photovoltaic Performance of Cd-Free Cu2ZnSnS4 Heterojunction Solar Cells Using SnS HTL and TiO2 ETL. Solar Energy, 215, 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.I., Alharbi, F.H., El-Mellouhi, F. and Tabet, N. (2018) Design Optimization of Solar Cell with Molybdenum Sulfide as Light Absorber. Journal of Photonics for Energy, 8, Article ID: 025501. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.8.025501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127517-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, F., Li, H., Yao, L., Lin, W., Lin, L., Chen, W., Wei, D., Liu, S., Chen, S. and Chen, G. (2021) In-situ Hydrothermal Growth of MoS2 Absorber Layer for Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells. Solar Energy, 230, 754-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.064</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>