<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2023.138115</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS-127422</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Study of Slope Stability Using the Bishop Slice Method: An Approach Combining Analytical and Numerical Analyses
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koffi</surname><given-names>Judicael Agbelele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guy</surname><given-names>Oyeniran Adeoti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daniel</surname><given-names>Yémalin Agossou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gérard</surname><given-names>Gbaguidi Aïsse</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Test and Studies in Civil Engineering (L2EGC), Abomey, Republic of Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>National School of Technical Education (ENSET), Lokossa, Republic of Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Materials and Structures Laboratory (LAMS), Cotonou, Republic of Benin</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1446</fpage><lpage>1456</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The importance of slope stability in civil engineering cannot be underestimated, as failure of these structures can result in significant damage to downstream infrastructure and property. In this study, we used the Bishop slice method, combining both an analytical approach and a numerical approach using the SLOPE/W module of the Geostudio 2018 R2 software. The results obtained from these two methods showed that increasing soil cohesion helps to improve slope stability. The safety coefficients obtained by the analytical method vary between 0.621 and 1.422, while those obtained by the numerical method vary between 0.622 and 1.447, for cohesion values ranging from 4 kPa to 20 kPa.
   
  The results obtained by these two methods show a linear relationship between the safety coefficients and soil cohesion. The equation of the analytical method is y
   
  =
   
  0.0496x
   
  +
   
  0.4407, while that of the numerical method is y
   
  =
   
  0.0512x
   
  +
   
  0.4357. The results of the analytical approach indicate that a safety coefficient of 1.5 is reached when the cohesion reaches a value of 22 kPa, while the numerical approach shows a safety coefficient of 1.5 reached at a cohesion of 21 kPa. The difference between these two cohesion values can be explained by the number of slices used, which is smaller in the analytical method. However, the equation derived from the analytical method can be used as a general guide to assess the evolution of the safety coefficient of an overloaded slope in long-term behaviour with an increase in cohesion. However, it is important to stress the importance of verification using specialised software based on the finite element method.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Slope</kwd><kwd> Stability</kwd><kwd> Safety Factor</kwd><kwd> Cohesion</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Embankment stability is a crucial issue in civil engineering, as demonstrated by several sources. Slope stability is a topic of great importance in civil engineering, as slope failures can cause considerable damage to infrastructure and downstream properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref1">1</xref>] . Slope stability is a worldwide problem which above all affects people’s safety [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref2">2</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref3">3</xref>] determines the factor of safety (FOS) of slopes located at Pahang Matriculation College. The slope stability is always considered crucial, as even slight failures can cause monetary losses and harm to human lives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref4">4</xref>] . The problem of slope stability is topical not only for evaluating existing slopes but also for implementing new slopes or excavations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref5">5</xref>] . Geotechnicians, both practitioners and researchers are concerned about the stability of earth structures such as cuttings, embankments, and dikes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref6">6</xref>] . Slope failure has been a major cause of human and material losses, leading to extensive research in this field. Therefore, analyzing slope stability is an important parameter in the design of road embankments to ensure stable and safe construction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref7">7</xref>] . Many authors have addressed the issue of embankment stability, as shown by references Chapter 18 of this document [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref8">8</xref>] is dedicated to the analysis of stability. In 1996, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref9">9</xref>] discusses the construction of embankments on organic soils. Some studies demonstrate the potential of satellite interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (inSAR) to identify precursors to catastrophic slope failures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref10">10</xref>] , while others use Pseudostatic analysis to analyze slope stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref11">11</xref>] . The effect of spatial variability of soil properties, slope inclination, and excitation characteristics on the development of permanent displacements is investigated using random fields created by the Local Average Subdivision method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref12">12</xref>] . Additionally, studies conclude that the factor of safety (FS) of a slope can also be computed with FLAC by gradually reducing the soil shear strength until failure occurs, using the shear strength reduction technique (SSR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref13">13</xref>] . The purpose of the study was to use both limit equilibrium methods (LEMs) and numerical simulations (finite element method (FEM)) to understand the common factor imposing the selected slope into slope instabilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref14">14</xref>] . A number of studies have been carried out to gain a better understanding of slope stability. These include slope stability analyses using the finite element method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref15">15</xref>] . The stability analyses are carried out by the FEM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref16">16</xref>] , research focusing on slope stability in geotechnical engineering, and a study using geographic information systems (GIS) to map landslide susceptibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref17">17</xref>] . The aim of these studies is to increase knowledge of slope stability and to develop tools and methods for assessing and preventing the risks associated with landslides. It is widely recognised by various sources that engineers need tools for analysing slope stability. For example, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref4">4</xref>] emphasise the importance of slope stability analyses to ensure the safety of people and infrastructure. Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref18">18</xref>] indicates that slope stability analysis tools are essential for assessing the risks of ground movement and designing appropriate protection measures, as does [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref19">19</xref>] . These tools include analytical and numerical methods, such as limit analysis and the finite element method.</p><p>Analytical methods play a key role in assessing slope stability. They are based on mathematical equations derived from soil mechanics and are particularly suitable for analysing simple, homogeneous slopes. However, other sources emphasise the importance of numerical methods for dealing with more complex situations, in particular the effects of run-off water and erosion on slope stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref21">21</xref>] conducted slope analsis by using finite-element software. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref22">22</xref>] conducted numerically using 2D and 3D limit equilibrium method (LEM) utilising the Slide program by Rocscience. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref23">23</xref>] proposed a new method to determine the minimum slope safety factor which is the determination of slope safety factor with analytical solution and searching critical slip surface with Genetic-Traversal Random Method.</p><p>Although analytical methods are often used for simple, homogeneous slopes, they have limitations for complex, heterogeneous slopes. According to Bishop et al. (2000), in such cases numerical methods are preferred as they use finite element models to simulate soil and rock behaviour under real loading conditions, allowing more accurate analysis of slope stability.</p><p>It is important to note that numerical methods can be costly in terms of time and resources, and their reliability can be affected by the uncertainties associated with the modelling parameters and site conditions. Indeed, numerical methods often require a significant amount of data and computation time to be implemented properly. Consequently, it is important for engineers to understand the limitations and assumptions of these methods when analysing slope stability.</p><p>The use of simulation software for slope stability analysis can introduce potential errors that must be taken into account. Errors can be caused by incorrect data entry, inappropriate parameter selection or misinterpretation of results. Therefore, users should be aware of these errors and take precautions to minimise their impact on the final results.</p><p>It is very important to compare the results of simulation software with those of analytical and numerical methods in order to guarantee the reliability of the results. This comparison allows the detection of manipulation errors such as incorrect data input, incorrect parameter settings or misinterpretation of results, which can lead to erroneous conclusions. By ensuring the reliability of the results, engineers can make more informed decisions to guarantee the stability of embankments and the safety of people and property located downstream.</p><p>The overall objective of this study is to add to the existing knowledge of slope stability assessment using Bishop’s slice method, building on previous work with the slice method used by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref1">1</xref>] , [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref24">24</xref>] in Slope Stability Analysis Using Slice-Wise Factor of Safety, in order to improve the understanding and application of slope stability analysis methods. This study follows on from our study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref1">1</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Method of Analysis</title><p>To carry out our study on slope stability, we chose to use the Limit Equilibrium Method, which is considered reliable and easy to use by many engineers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref26">26</xref>] The limiting equilibrium method is the traditional method used to determine the stability of slopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref27">27</xref>] , LEM method is more often used by Engineers because they are more familiar than the FEM method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref28">28</xref>] . Currently, both the limit equilibrium method and the strength reduction method are commonly used in slope stability calculations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref29">29</xref>] . Modern limit equilibrium software is making it possible to handle ever-increasing complexity within an analysis. In this study, we applied the slice method because of the heterogeneity of the layers in our case study, which is composed of two materials: fill and foundation soil. The slice method involves dividing the embankment into several slices and then analysing the forces acting on each of these slices. Bishop’s slice method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref30">30</xref>] , [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref7">7</xref>] is one of the most commonly used analytical methods for slope stability analysis, as discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref31">31</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref36">36</xref>] . It consists of dividing the slope into several vertical sections, whose equilibrium is analysed using the equations of soil mechanics. This method is particularly useful for heterogeneous slopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref37">37</xref>] as it allows variations in soil properties along the slope surface to be taken into account. Limit equilibrium method divides the soil in potential sliding surface into several blocks, and calculates stability coefficient by establishing static equilibrium equation and torque equilibrium equation of each block and whole sliding surface based on Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref38">38</xref>] . To do this, we used Bishop’s method, both analytically using MS Excel, and numerically using the specialised software Geostudio 2018 R2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref39">39</xref>] and more particularly its Slope/W module.</p><p>The slice method is widely used to analyse slope stability, particularly for complex, heterogeneous slopes, as it takes into account variations in soil properties along the slope surface by dividing it into several slices.</p><p>- Bishop’s method</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the slice with forces applied.</p><p>The general expression of the safety coefficient for all bands gives:</p><p>F S = ∑ c i l i + ( W i − u i l i ) tan φ i ∑ W i sin α i [ cos α i + sin α i tan φ i F S ]</p><p>where i is the slot number.</p><p>This equation was first solved using the analytical method and then the Geostudio 2018 R2 software was used with the SLOPE/W module. A comparison is made between the two methods.</p>Case Studies<p>Analytical and numerical analysis techniques were used to assess stability, taking into account additional loads. The geotechnical characteristics and geometric configuration of the embankment were based on studies by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> illustrates the geotechnical parameters of the soils.</p><p>The calculation is based on the following assumptions:</p><p>• Stable foundation 5 m deep;</p><p>• Addition of 6 m high silty sand backfill;</p><p>• The slope of the embankment is 71.57˚;</p><p>• The water level is 1.5 m above the ground level;</p><p>• Uniformly distributed load Q = 25 kpa at the head of the slope with an offset of 1.5 m from the edge.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> represents the modelling of the embankment in Geostudio 2018 R2.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Analytical Method</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the Summary of preliminary calculations using the analytical method.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the variation in the safety coefficient as a function of cohesion using the analytical method</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the evolution of the safety factor as a function of cohesion.</p><p>Analysing the results obtained by the analytical method, it can be seen that the function obtained for the variation of the safety coefficient as a function of the cohesion of the slope soil is a linear and increasing function, with a value of =0.9977. This function is expressed by the equation y = 0.0496x + 0.4407. According to this function, to achieve a safety coefficient of 1.5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref41">41</xref>] . For this slope, a cohesion of 21.35 may be 22 kPa, would be required.</p><p>Previous studies have shown that the Bishop method is significantly more accurate than the Fellenius method for assessing slope stability. This finding is of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geotechnical parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref1">1</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of soil</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight by volume</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cohesion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Friction angle</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >γ = 18KN/m<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C = 04 kpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >φ = 25˚</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foundation soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >γ = 19 KN/m<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C = 09 kpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >φ = 24.5˚</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of preliminary calculations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Slice number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >sinα</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >cosα</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = wcosα</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T = Wsinα</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c * b</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wcosα-ul</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >tanφ</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−18.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−18.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−68.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−32.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−68.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−80.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.716</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−92.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−23.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.459</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−21.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.616</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.663</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.733</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>great importance as it underlines the advantage of the Bishop method over the Fellenius method in terms of accuracy and reliability of results.</p><p>More specifically, the Bishop method offers additional advantages over the Fellenius method in terms of taking more accurate account of the forces and moments of resistance mobilised in a slope. By using advanced analytical and numerical formulations, Bishop’s method enables better modelling and a deeper understanding of slope stability mechanisms.</p><p>In general, if the factor of safety of a slope is within the interval between 0 and 1.0, the slope is actively unstable. The value over 1.0 indicates that the slope is considered stable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref44">44</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Numerical Method</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> presents the variation of the safety coefficient as a function of cohesion using the numerical method.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the evolution of the safety factor as a function of cohesion.</p><p>The function y = 0.0512x + 0.4357 obtained from the numerical analysis of the slope shows an increasing linear relationship between the safety coefficient and soil cohesion. This relationship is confirmed by the studies of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref45">45</xref>] , which show that the safety coefficient increases with increasing soil cohesion. Finally, the study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref46">46</xref>] reviewed the effect of vegetation on slope stability and highlighted</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of the safety coefficient as a function of cohesion using the analytical method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cohesion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 4 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 8 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 12 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 16 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 20 kPa</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bishop safety factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.621</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.239</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.422</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of the safety coefficient as a function of cohesion using the analytical method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cohesion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 4 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 8 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 12 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 16 kPa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C = 20 kPa</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bishop safety factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.622</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.447</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>that vegetation can improve soil cohesion and therefore contribute to slope stability.</p><p>Based on this function, we can deduce that a safety factor of 1.5 for this slope would require a cohesion of 20.79, or 21 kPa, which is consistent with the results obtained by the analytical method.</p><p>The results obtained in this study highlight the crucial importance of soil cohesion in slope stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127422-ref47">47</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In conclusion, this study verified the stability of an artificial slope with a surcharge in the presence of a water table using analytical and numerical methods. The safety coefficients obtained showed that soil cohesion has a significant impact on slope stability. The results of the analytical and numerical methods showed a difference due to the number of slices used in the analytical method. The results obtained may be useful for the design and construction of artificial embankments, taking into account surcharge conditions and the water table.</p><p>Our future perspectives would be to study the effect of anisotropy of soil mechanical properties on slope stability.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Agbelele, K.J., Adeoti, G.O., Agossou, D.Y. and A&#239;sse, G.G. (2023) Study of Slope Stability Using the Bishop Slice Method: An Approach Combining Analytical and Numerical Analyses. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 13, 1446-1456. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2023.138115</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127422-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agbelele, K.J., Houehanou, E.C., Ahlinhan, M.F. and Ali, A.W. (2023) Assessment of Slope Stability by the Fellenius Slice Method: Analytical and Numerical Approach. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 18, 1205-1214. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.2.0874</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greenwood, J.R. (2006) SLIP4EX—A Program for Routine Slope Stability Analysis to Include the Effects of Vegetation, Reinforcement and Hydrological Changes. Geotechnical &amp; Geological Engineering, 24, 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-4156-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zolkepli, M.F., Ishak, M.F. and Zaini, M.S.I. (2019) Slope Stability Analysis Using Modified Fellenius’s and Bishop’s Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 527, Article ID: 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ullah, S., Khan, M.U. and Rehman, G. (2020) A Brief Review of the Slope Stability Analysis Methods. Geological Behavior, 4, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.26480/gbr.02.2020.73.77</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harabinová, S., Kotrasová, K., Kormaníková, E. and Hegedüsová, I. (2021) Analysis of Slope Stability. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 17, 192-199. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, H., Zhang, B., Wu, C. and Chen, K. (2021) Macro and Micro Analysis on Coal-Bearing Soil Slopes Instability Based on CFD-DEM Coupling Method. PLOS ONE, 16, e0257362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257362</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mesa-Lavista, M., álvarez-Pérez, J., Tejeda-Piusseaut, E. and Lamas-Fernández, F. (2021) Safety-Factor Dataset for High Embankments Determined with Different Analytical Methods. Data in Brief, 38, Article ID: 107315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arora, D.A.R. (2003) Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 903 p. https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1EF4773AF40B569037A237C3249B4ED4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neves, M., Cavaleiro, V. and Pinto, A. (2016) Slope Stability Assessment and Evaluation of Remedial Measures Using Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element Approaches. Procedia Engineering, 143, 717-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carlà, T., et al. (2019) Perspectives on the Prediction of Catastrophic Slope Failures from Satellite InSAR. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 14137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50792-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Melo, C. and Sharma, S. (2004) Seismic Coefficients for Pseudostatic Slope Analysis. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 1-6 August 2004, Paper No. 369, 15 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alamanis, N. and Dakoulas, P. (2019) Effect of Spatial Variability of Soil Properties on the Stability and Permanent Seismic Displacements of Highway Slopes. 17th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Reykjavik, 1-6 September 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cala, M. and Flisiak, J. (2020) Slope Stability Analysis with FLAC and Limit Equilibrium Methods. In: Billaux, D., Detournay, C., Hart, R. and Rachez, X., Eds., FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics—2001, CRC Press, London, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003077527-18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sengani, F. and Mulenga, F. (2020) Application of Limit Equilibrium Analysis and Numerical Modeling in a Case of Slope Instability. Sustainability, 12, Article No. 8870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218870</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Totsev, A. and Jellev, J. (2009) Slope Stability Analysis Using Conventional Methods and FEM. 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, 5-9 October 2009, 1503-1505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lotfalian, M. (2019) Slope Stability Analysis Considering Weight of Trees and Root Reinforcement. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 27, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2019.11292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiao, S., Li, K., Ding, X. and Liu, T. (2015) Numerical Computation of Homogeneous Slope Stability. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2015, Article ID: 802835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/802835</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nata, R.A. and Alexander, A. (2019) Analysis Stability of Slope in Pit B Miyor Pratama Coal Accompany, Kumanis Atas Village, Talawi Regency, Sawahlunto, West Sumatera. Promine, 7, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.33019/promine.v7i1.1056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harabinová, S. and Panulinová, E. (2020) Impact of Shear Strength Parameters on Slope Stability. MATEC Web of Conferences, 310, Article No. 00040. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202031000040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, T., Zhang, L., Cheng, J., Wang, J., Zhang, X. and Li, M. (2022) Assessing the Rainfall Infiltration on FOS via a New NSRM for a Case Study at High Rock Slope Stability. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 11917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15350-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, B., Yang, T., Xu, Z., Liu, H., Shi, W. and Yang, X. (2018) Numerical Simulation of the Free Surface and Water Inflow of a Slope, Considering the Nonlinear Flow Properties of Gravel Layers: A Case Study. Royal Society Open Science, 5, Article ID: 172109. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, N.S. and Ismail, M.A.M. (2020) 3D Limit Equilibrium Method for Rock Slope Stability Analysis Using Generalised Anisotropic Material Model. In: Dight, P.M., Ed., Slope Stability 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 715-730. https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2025_46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niu, W.-J. (2014) Determination of Slope Safety Factor with Analytical Solution and Searching Critical Slip Surface with Genetic-Traversal Random Method. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID: 950531. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/950531</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y., Tong, Z.-Y. and Lü, Q. (2014) Slope Stability Analysis Using Slice-Wise Factor of Safety. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, Article ID: 712145. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/712145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Durville, J.-L. (2016) Note sur les calculs de stabilité des talus avec surface de rupture polygonale. Revue Fran&amp;#231;aise de Géotechnique, 148, Article No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2016011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, S., Zhao, Z., Hu, B., Yin, T., Chen, G. and Chen, G. (2022) Hazard Classification and Stability Analysis of High and Steep Slopes from Underground to Open-Pit Mining. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article No. 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811679</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, C. and Hounsa, U.S.F. (2018) Analysis of Road Embankment Slope Stability. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 8, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2018.82010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Lin, H. and Hu, H. (2023) Nonlinear Strength Reduction Method of Rock Mass in Slope Stability Evaluation. Materials, 16, Article No. 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072793</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashour, M.A., Hussein, M.H., Enieb Osman, M. and Abed Elkader, M.F. (2006) Factors Affecting the Stability of Highway Side Slopes. “Case Study: Roads Adjacent Water Ways in Upper Egypt”. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 34, 1765-1785. https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2006.111145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alfat, S., Zulmasri, L.O.M., Asfar, S., Rianse, M.S. and Eso, R. (2019) Slope Stability Analysis through Variational Slope Geometry Using Fellenius Method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1242, Article ID: 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1242/1/012020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ji, J., Zhang, C., Gao, Y. and Kodikara, J. (2018) Effect of 2D Spatial Variability on Slope Reliability: A Simplified FORM Analysis. Geoscience Frontiers, 9, 1631-1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mebrahtu, T.K., Heinze, T., Wohnlich, S. and Alber, M. (2022) Slope Stability Analysis of Deep-Seated Landslides Using Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element Methods in Debre Sina Area, Ethiopia. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 81, Article No. 403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02906-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, S.-H., Huang, J., Huang, F., Yang, J., Yao, C. and Zhou, C.-B. (2018) Modelling of Spatial Variability of Soil Undrained Shear Strength by Conditional Random Fields for Slope Reliability Analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 63, 374-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, G., Xie, M., Liang, J., Farooq, A. and Williams, E.J. (2020) A GIS-Based 3D Slope Stability Analysis Method Based on the Assumed Normal Stress on the Slip Surface. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 4442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61301-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sari, P.T.K., Lastiasih, Y. and Shoffiana, N.A. (2022) Comparison of Safety Factor and Geosyntetic Reinforcement Requirement for Slope Stability Using 2-D and 3-D Analysis Method. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 20, 1016-1026. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-34051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahale, P.P., Nalgire, T., Mehta, A.A. and Hiwase, P.D. (2020) Slope Stability Analysis by GeoSlope. Helix, 10, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.29042/2020-10-1-71-75</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, Y. and Wang, Z. (2023) Study on Upper Bound Limit Analysis of Horizontal Layers Slope Stability Based on Optimization Method. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 6106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33373-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chae, B.-G., Lee, J.-H., Park, H.-J. and Choi, J. (2015) A Method for Predicting the Factor of Safety of an Infinite Slope Based on the Depth Ratio of the Wetting Front Induced by Rainfall Infiltration. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1835-1849. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1835-2015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nekouei, A. and Ahangari, K. (2013) Validation of Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion Charts for Rock Slopes. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23, 805-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farazi, A.H., Mia, A.J. and Mahmud, I. (2018) A Case Study Based Slope Stability Analysis at Chittagong City, Bangladesh. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, 3, 164-173. https://doi.org/10.24273/jgeet.2018.3.3.1690</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grifths, D.V. and Lane, P.A. (1999) Slope Stability Analysis by Finite Elements. Géotechnique, 49, 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.3.387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shruthi, B., Rajurkar, V.J. and Geete, S.S. (2019) Stability Analysis of Dump Slope in Open Cast Mines. Helix, 9, 5706-5710. https://doi.org/10.29042/2019-5706-5710</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shogaki, T. and Kumagai, N. (2008) A Slope Stability Analysis Considering Undrained Strength Anisotropy of Natural Clay Deposits. Soils and Foundations, 48, 805-819. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.805</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Su, H., Yang, M. and Wen, Z. (2016) An Approach Using Multi-Factor Combination to Evaluate High Rocky Slope Safety. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16, 1449-1463. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1449-2016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, S., Jin, A. and Gao, Y. (2006) Numerical Simulation Analysis on Strength Reduction for Slope of Jointed Rock Masses Based on Gereralized Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 28, 1975-1980.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noroozi, A.G. and Hajiannia, A. (2017) The Effects of Various Factors on Slope Stability. International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, 4, 44-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127422-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arif, M. (2022) The Effect of Excavation Work to Soil Slope Stability. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 3, 86-93. https://doi.org/10.37253/jcep.v3i2.7179</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>