1. Introduction

OJOG

Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

2160-8792

Scientific Research Publishing

10.4236/ojog.2023.138115

OJOG-127165

Articles

Medicine&Healthcare

Immuno-Histochemical Profile of Breast Cancers at the General Hospital of Douala-Cameroon

Ekono

Michel Roger Guy

¹^*Ngaha

Yaneu Junie

²Neng

Humphry Tatah

³Messakop

Yannick

¹Azoumbou

Mefant Thérèse

²Ze

Ngbwa Mimi Flore

²Essome

Henri

²Essola

Basile

²Engbang

Jean-Paul

²Tchente

Nguefack Charlotte

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ebolowa Regional Hospital, Ebolowa, Cameroon

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon

08082023

13081377138814, July 202320, August 2023 23, August 2023

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Introduction: The aim of the study was to describe the immunohistochemical aspects of breast cancers at Douala General Hospital , Cameroon. Methodology: This was a descriptive study with retrospective data collection, conducted from January 1^st 2010 and December 31^st 2019. It was focused on histologically proven breast cancers followed up at Douala General Hospital. Results: We collected 285 cases of breast cancer, all female, representing an annual frequency of 28.5 cases. The mean age of the patients was 48 ± 13 years. The most frequent histological form was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (83.9%), with grade II predominating (38.6%). Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 89 patients (31.23%). The triple-negative subtype was the most common class (35.95%), followed by Luminal A (32.60); Human Epidermal Receptor 2-class and Luminal B tumors were observed at a frequency of 13.48% each. Treatment consisted mainly of surgery (78.60%) combined with chemotherapy (65.97%) and/or radiotherapy (63.16%). Hormonal treatment was used in only 10.18% of patients. Targeted therapy was exceptional (4%). Conclusion: Triple-negative phenotype is the most common. However, potentially hormone-sensitive tumors account for almost half of all patients, who are relatively young. Individualized treatments are rare. It is important to systematize these analyses for all breast cancers, with a view to appropriate management in our environment.

Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry Douala General Hospital of Cameroon

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide [1] . In fact, the World Health Organization estimates that there will be 2.3 million new cases in 2020. It also carries a high mortality rate, with 685,000 deaths worldwide in the same year [1] [2] . In Africa, the incidence of breast cancer has almost doubled in a decade [3] [4] . In Cameroon, 4170 new cases were diagnosed in 2020, compared with 3265 in 2018 [2] [4] . What’s more, the continent has a singularly high mortality rate. Along with Polynesia, Africa has the highest breast cancer mortality rate: 85,800 women died of the disease in 2020, while 2108 died in Cameroon in the same year [1] [2] . However, the survival of breast cancer patients worldwide has improved markedly thanks to the introduction of new prognostic factors in the development of therapeutic strategies [5] . Indeed, several authors have demonstrated the role of tumor biology profiling, through immunohistochemistry, molecular biology and genomic studies, leading to personalized treatment for patients, which in turn guarantees better yields [5] - [9] . Immunohistochemical analysis of breast cancer is not yet widespread in Cameroon, and data on the subject remain limited. The aim of this study was to describe the immunohistochemical profile of breast cancer patients at the Douala General Hospital in Cameroon.

2. Participant and Method2.1. Setting and Study Population

This was a descriptive study with retrospective data collection from January 1er 2010 to December 31 2019, i.e. 9 years, at the Douala General Hospital. It concerned all patients followed in the obstetrics and gynecology department for histologically proven breast cancer. We excluded records of patients with primary cancer of another organ with metastasis to the breast and those with cancer other than gynecological or breast cancer.

2.2. Procedures

Records of patients treated for breast cancer were identified in the outpatient, inpatient and operating room registers of the obstetrics and gynecology departments, and in the oncology department. We selected those in which the diagnosis had been confirmed by histological study, either on biopsy samples or surgical specimens. The medical record was consulted to collect data on a survey form previously designed using Epi Infos 7.0 software, including:

· Epidemiological data: age, marital status.

· Clinical data: personal history: medical, gynecological and obstetrical, toxicological, family history of cancer, lesion location, lesion sites, evolutionary stage (FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) histological type, scarff Bloom Richardson’s histopronostic grade.

· Histological data.

· Immunohistochemical data.

We assessed estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression by the percentage of tumor cell nuclear labeling, estimated visually. A percentage greater than 1% was considered positive [10] . The results of RO and RP labeling were combined and analyzed jointly to define hormone receptor (HR) status. We defined RH-, any tumor with RO- and RP-status. HER (Human Epidermal Receptor) 2 expression was expressed as a score (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). A score of 0 or 1+ and a score of 3+ were considered HER2- and HER2-enriched, respectively. We considered 2+ scores as unclassifiable breast cancers. We proceeded to characterize molecular subtypes using the recommendations of the 13ème St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2011 [11] . Based on the expression of oetrogen receptor (OR), progesterone receptor (PR) genes, the level of proliferation index

Ki67 < 14% = weak; Ki67 > 14% = strong

and the expression of the proto-oncogene Human Epidermal Receptor 2 (HER2), patients were grouped into 4 subtypes:

Luminal type A Luminal type B HER 2 type.

And the basal like triple-negative type (see Table 1).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software. Qualitative data were represented as numbers and proportions. Quantitative data was represented by mean and standard deviation.

2.4. Ethics

Ethical clearance was given by the institutional ethic committee of University of Douala. Total confidentiality was respected. All analyses were performed anonymously.

3. Results

During our study period, we recorded 285 cases of breast cancer, representing an annual frequency of 28.5 cases.

3.1. Epidemiological Data

All patients were female. The mean age of patients was 48 ± 13 years, with extremes of 19 and 84 years, and a median age of 47 years. The most represented age group was [40 - 50[ (30.9%), followed by [30 - 40[ (24.60%). Two-thirds of

Table 1 Molecular classification of breast cancers

Criteria	Luminal A	Luminal B	HER 2	Basal-like Triple negative
Immunohistochemistry	RO+/RP+/HER2-Ki67 < 14%	RO+/RP+/HER2+ OR RO+/RP+/HER2-Ki67 > 14%	RO-/RP-HER2+	RO-RP-HER2-

patients were married (66.0%) (see Table 2).

3.2. Clinical Data

A family history of breast cancer was found in 7.02%. Nearly half the patients (48.77%) were grand multiparous. More than half the patients (54.04%) were non-menopausal. The average consultation time was 8.9 ± 12.7 months. The predominant tumour location was the upper-external quadrant (41.8%), with left breast involvement predominating (53.3%). Stages III (54.73%) and II (36.49%) were the most common (see Table 3 and Table 4).

Table 2 Ages, sex, marital status of patients. N = 285

Terms and condition	Features	Values
Gender	Female	285 (100)
Gender	Male	0
Age	Average age	48 ± 13
Age	Median age	47
Age ranges	[10 - 20[	1 (0.35)
	[20 - 30[	10 (3.5)
	[30 - 40[	70 (24.6)
	[40 - 50[	88 (30.9)
	[50 - 60[	64 (22.5)
	≥60	52 (18.2)
Marital status	Bride	188 (66.0)
	Single	57 (20.0)
	Widow	40 (14.0)

Table 3 Medical and surgical history of patients with breast cancer at Douala General Hospital. N = 285

Terms and conditions	Features	Values
Notion of familial cancer	Breast Collar Ovary Horn	20 (7.02) 3 (1.05) 3 (1.05) 1 (0.35
Parity	Parity not specified 0 children 1 to 2 children 3 to 4 children ≥5 children	9 (3.16) 20 (7.02) 30 (10.52) 87 (30.53) 139 (48.77)
Genital status	Non-menopausal Menopausal women	154 (54.04) 131 (45.96)

Table 4 Lesion location and stage of breast cancer on admission to Douala General Hospital. N = 285

Terms and conditions	Features	Number (%)
Lesion location	Bilateral Law Left	5 (1.75) 128 (44.92) 152 (53.33)
Lesion site	Bifocal Lower External Quadrant (IEQ) Inferior-internal quadrant (QII) Upper-external quadrant (QSE) Superior-internal quadrant (QSI) Retroareolar Whole breast	3 (1.05) 49 (17.20) 25 (8.77) 119 (41.75) 59 (20.70) 10 (3.51) 20 (7.02)
Progressive stage on admission	Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Undetermined	10 (3.51) 104 (36.49) 156 (54.74) 10 (3.51) 5 (1.75)

3.3. Data on Histological Type, Grade and Immunohistochemical Class

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma was the most common histological type (83.86%). These cancers were predominantly grade II (64.33%). Immunohistochemical analyses were carried out on 89 patients (31.23%); the majority of breast cancers were of triple-negative subtype (35.95%), followed by Luminal A (32.60); tumours of HER2 class and Luminal B were observed at a frequency of 13.48% each (Table 5).

3.4. Therapeutic Modality

Surgery was performed on 224 patients (78.60%). Almost all surgeries were radical (93.75%). Chemotherapy was used in 65.97% of patients, and was generally neoadjuvant (90.4%). It was generally neoadjuvant (90.4%), and the most frequently used chemotherapy protocol was Paclitaxel combined with Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin (AC) (35.6%).

Radiotherapy was used in 180 patients (63.16%). Hormonal treatment was used in 29 patients (10.18%). Among our patients, 12 (4.21%) benefited from Trastuzumab-based targeted therapy (see Table 6).

4. Discussion

In the course of this study, we recorded 285 cases of breast cancer, all involving female subjects, a result similar to that of Atenguena and al [12] . In a multicentre study, Enbang and al. found 2.40% of cases in men [13] .

The mean age of the patients was 48 ± 13 years. The age of the patients in our study is close to that reported by various African authors [13] [14] [15] .

Table 5 Distribution of breast cancers by histological type, grade and immunohistochemical class at Douala General Hospital. N = 285

	Modality	Number (%)
Histology	Invasive ductal carcinoma	239 (83.86)
	Invasive lobular carcinoma	15 (5.26)
	Medullary carcinoma	12 (4.21)
	Intracanal carcinoma	11 (3.86)
	Mucinous carcinoma	6 (2.11)
	Paget’s disease	1 (0.35)
	Mesenchymal sarcoma	1 (0.35)
Grade	Evaluated	171 (60)
	Not rated	114 (40)
	Grade 1	17 (9.94)
Grade n = 171	Grade 2	110 (64.33)
	Grade 3	44 (25.73)
Immunohistochemical	Not done	196 (68.77)
class	Fact	89 (31.23)
	Human Epidermal Receptor	12 (13.48)
Class n = 89	2 (HER2)	29 (32.60)
	LUMINAL A	12 (13.48)
	LUMINAL B	32 (35.95)
	Triple negative basal like	4 (4.49)
	Uncategorized

HER2: Human Epidermal Receptor 2; ACR: American college of radiology.

More than half of our patients (54.03%) were non-menopausal, in line with various sub-Saharan authors [13] - [17] . Breast cancer therefore occurs in relatively young patients, still subject to sex hormone stimulation. This detail could prove decisive when faced with a hormone-sensitive tumour.

The vast majority of our patients were either grand multiparous (48.77%) or multiparous (31.52%), a fact found by various authors in our area, in contradiction with the risk factor status accorded to nulliparity in the literature [17] [18] [19] [20] .

We observed 7.01% family history of breast cancer in our patients, indicating the possibility of genetic transmission mentioned in the literature (5% - 10%). Data similar to that of Tchente (7.14%) [21] .

There is conflicting evidence in the literature as to the predominance of tumour location in one breast or the other [12] [13] [22] [23] [24] [25] . In our series, the left breast was the most frequently affected (53.33%). Bilateral involvement has been described in proportions ranging from 1% to 11.1% in our setting [13] [24] [25] . It is thought to be associated with mutation of the BRCA1 and

Table 6 Distribution of patients by type of treatment

Terms and conditions	Variables	Number (%)
Surgery	Yes No	224 (78.60) 61 (21.40)
Type of surgery n = 224	Radicale Curator	210 (93.75) 14 (6.25)
Radiotherapy	Yes No Not specified	180 (63.16) 35 (12.28) 70 (24.56)
Chemotherapy	Yes No	188 (65.97) 97 (34.03)
Type of chemotherapy n = 188	Adjuvant	27 (9.6)
Protocol used	Neoadjuvant FAC AC+Paclitaxel AC FAC+Docetaxel Cisplatin Docetaxel FAC+Paclitaxel Paclitaxel Vinorelbine TC Doxorubicne + Docetaxel	161 (90.4) 36 (17.6) 73 (35.6) 50 (24.4) 28 (13.7) 1 (0.5) 5 (2.4) 3 (1.5) 5 (2.4) 2 (1.0) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5)
Targeted therapy n = 12 Hormonal treatment (29)	Trastuzumab Tamoxifen Anastrozole Radical castration	12 (4.2) 23 (79.2) 5 (17.3) 1 (3.5)

BRCA2 genes [26] . It was observed in 1.8% of patients in our series.

The tumor was located preferentially in the upper lateral quadrant (41.75%), in line with the literature [19] [21] [23] . On admission, stage III patients predominated (54.7%), followed by stage II (36.5%). Late diagnosis has been described in several African series [13] [16] [20] [21] [27] .

Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most frequent histological type, accounting for 83.89% of all cases, in agreement with Atenguena and al. (90%) and other authors [12] - [25] . Sarcomas were rare (0.35%), in line with the work of Echimane et al. [28] . Lymphoma was not observed, contrary to the work of Engbang and al [13] .

The predominant Scarff Bloom Richardson histopronostic grade was grade II (64.33%), followed by grade III (25.73%), data similar to those of Engbang et al. (60% and 20%) [13] .

The most common immunohistochemical class was the triple-negative subtype (35.95%). The predominance of this subtype was found by Atenguena and al. and Atangana and al. in two Cameroonian series at rates of 41.9% and 37.98% respectively [12] [14] . Other series have also found this predominance of triple-negative tumours in African patients [29] [30] [31] . However, Western and North African series found a preponderance of luminal A breast cancer [32] [33] .

The second most frequent immunohistochemical class was the Luminal A subtype (32.60%). This is in agreement with the findings of Atangana and al. (36.06%) [14] . However, in the Atenguena and al. series, the HER2 subtype was more frequent than the 2 hormone-sensitive forms (Luminal A and Luminal B), at 25.3% versus 16.1% for both [12] . Engbang and al, in a series of 3044 cases involving 5 of the 10 regions of Cameroon, were only able to observe immunohistochemical analysis in 11 patients (0.36%) [13] . These aspects reflect the inadequate implementation of these analyses in our environment, probably due to the limited technical resources available. This could have a deleterious impact on the management of breast cancer in our environment, even increasing mortality. Indeed, several authors have demonstrated the decisive role of immunohistochemical profiling in therapeutic and prognostic terms, and its vital importance in improving the efficiency of breast cancer management [5] - [9] .

More than 3/4 of patients (78.60%) underwent surgery, mostly radical, while virtually all 2/3 received courses of chemotherapy (65.97%) and/or radiotherapy (63.16%). Hormonal treatment was used in only 10, 18% of patients despite the relatively high proportion of potentially hormone-sensitive tumors in genitally active subjects in our series (luminal A = 32.60%); luminal B = 13.48%), i.e. almost half the cases. Targeted treatment was exceptional (4%). This shows that the results of immunohistochemical analysis had very little influence on treatment in this series. However, the successful management of breast cancer in the West seems to be based on matching the treatment to the patient’s immunohistochemical class and hormonal situation, resulting in individualized treatments with reputable yield [5] . This is a step that needs to be taken in our field.

5. Conclusion

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumour in our environment. It occurs mainly in women of childbearing age. The most common histological type is invasive ductal carcinoma. The triple-negative phenotype is the most frequent in our series. However, potentially hormone-sensitive tumors account for almost half of all patients. It is important to introduce systematic immunohistochemical analysis for all cases of breast cancer, possibly with the support of the state. Broader studies, including gene mutation research, will be carried out to guide and individualize treatment protocols, with a view to optimal management of this pathology in our environment.

6. Highlights6.1. What Is Known

Breast cancer is the number one cancer in the world. It has a high mortality rate in Cameroon. There is very little data on immunohistochemical aspects in our environment.

6.2. The Issue

The aim of the study was to clarify the immunohistochemical aspects of breast cancers at Douala General Hospital.

6.3. Contribution of This Study

· Breast cancer occurs in relatively young patients. In most cases, it is diagnosed at an advanced stage;

· The triple-negative subtype is the most common in our sample; almost half of patients have a hormone-sensitive subtype.

6.4. The Implications

We need to systematize immunohistochemical analyses in Cameroon, and adapt treatment to the molecular profile.

Authors’ Contributions

Study design: Nguefack Tchente. Data collection: Ekono Michel Editor: Ekono Michel.

Revewers: Ngaha Yaneu Junie, Neng Humphry Tatah, Messakop Yannick, Azoumbou Mefant Thérèse, Essome Henri, Essola Basile, Engbang Jean-Paul.

Supervision: Nguefack Tchente.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Guy, E.M.R., Junie, N.Y., Tatah, N.H., Yannick, M., Thérèse, A.M., Flore, Z.N.M., Henri, E., Basile, E., Jean-Paul, E. and Charlotte, T.N. (2023) Immuno-Histochemical Profile of Breast Cancers at the General Hospital of Douala-Cameroon. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13, 1377-1388. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2023.138115

References1

Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2020) Global Cancer Statistics: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

Sharma, R., Aashima, Nanda, M., Fronterre, C., Sewagudde, P., Ssentongo, A.E., et al. (2020) Mapping Cancer in Africa: A Comprehensive and Comparable Characterization of 34 Cancer Types Using Estimates from GLOBOCAN. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article ID: 839835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.839835

Ferlay, J., Shin, H.R., Bray, F., Forman, D., Mathers, C. and Parkin, D.M. (2008) Estimates of Worldwide Burden of Cancer: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer, 127, 2893-2917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516

Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A. and Jemal, A. (2018) Global Cancer Statistics: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

Simpson, P.T., Reis-Filho, J.S., Gale, T. and Lakhani, S.R. (2005) Molecular Evolution of Breast Cancer. The Journal of Pathology, 205, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1691

Charafe-Jauffret, E., Chaffanet, M., Bertucci, F., Ginestier, C., Jacquemier, J., deLapeyrière, O., et al. (2007) Les cancers du sein: Vers un modèle cellulaire et moléculaire intégré. Médecine/Sciences, 23, 626-632. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20072367626

Daly, B. and Olopade, O.I. (2015) A Perfect Storm: How Tumor Biology, Genomics, and Health Care Delivery Patterns Collide to Create a Racial Survival Disparity in Breast Cancer and Proposed Interventions for Change: Closing the Racial Disparity Gap in Breast Cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 65, 221-238. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21271

Hagan, C.T., Medik, Y.B. and Wang, A.Z. (2018) Nanotechnology Approaches to Improving Cancer Immunotherapy. In: Advances in Cancer Research, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acr.2018.05.003

Bahnassy, A., Mohanad, M., Ismail, M.F., Shaarawy, S., El-Bastawisy, A. and Zekri, A.R.N. (2015) Molecular Biomarkers for Prediction of Response to Treatment and Survival in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients from Egypt. Experimental and Molecular Pathology, 99, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.07.014

Fitzgibbons, P.L., Dillon, D.A., Alsabeh, R., Berman, M.A., Hayes, D.F., et al. (2014) Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Breast. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 138, 595-601. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0566-CP

Abe, O., Abe, R., Enomoto, K., Kikuchi, K., Koyama, H., Masuda, H., et al. (2011) Relevance of Breast Cancer Hormone Receptors and Other Factors to the Efficacy of Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials. The Lancet, 378, 771-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8

Atenguena, O.E., Esson Mapoko, B.S., Douanla, P., Ndangue Ntone, N., Penda Ndedi, L., Tabola, L., et al. (2019) Immunophenotypic Profile of Breast Cancers in a Black African Population: An Observational Study at Yaoundé General Hospital from January to December. Pan African Medical Journal, 44, Article No. 5.

Engbang, J.P., Essome, H., Mve Koh, V.V., Simo, G., Sime Essam, J.D., Sone Mouelle, A. and Essame Oyono, J.L. (2015) Breast Cancer in Cameroon, Histo-Epidemiological Profile: About 3044 Cases. The Pan African Medical Journal, 21, Article No. 242.

Atangana, P.J., Nguefack, C., Fotsing, C.T., Dina Bell, E., Rachel, T., Tomfeu, N., et al. (2017) Immunohistochemical Aspects of Breast Cancers in Douala and Yaoundé. Health Sciences and Diseases, 18, 14-20.

Kingu, M., Rahma, T., Nlandu, M., Bedele, K., Kiyabwe, S. and Ukundi, O. (2019) Epidemio-Clinical and Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer in Hospitals in the City of Kinshasa-RD Congo. Kisangani Médical, 9, 326-332.

Kemfang Ngowa, J.D., Ebune, J.L., Ngassam, A., Atangana, J., Kabeyene, A. and Kasia, J.M. (2015) Clinicohistopathological Features and Molecular Markers of Breast Cancer in a Group of Patients at the Yaoundé General Hospital-Cameroon. Journal Africain du Cancer, 7, 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-015-0380-y

Esson Mapoko, B.S., Atenguena, O., Dina Bell, M.E., Anne Juliette, F.S., et al. (2023) Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Profile of Patients Followed for Breast Cancer in a Major Referral Medical Oncology Unit in Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pan African Medical Journal, 44, Article No. 4.

Zaki, H.M., Garba-Bouda, O., Garba, S.M. and Nouhou, H. (2013) Epidemiological and Anatomopathological Profile of Breast Cancer in Niger. Journal Africain du Cancer, 5, 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-013-0274-9

Kodoumé, M., Noa Ndoua, C.C., Atenguena Okobalemba, E., Tchatat Njassine, R.S., Esson Mapoko, B.S., Fozeu Fosso, L.C., Essiben, F., et al. (2023) Clinical, Paraclinical and Therapeutic Profile of Breast Cancer Surgery Patients at the Yaoundé Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital (HGOPY). Pan African Medical Journal, 44, Article No. 2.

Essiben, F., Foumane, P., Meka, E.J., Tchakounté, M., Dohbit, J.S., Nsahlai, C., et al. (2017) Descriptive Analysis of 192 Cases of Breast Cancer Occurring before Age 40 in Yaounde, Cameroon. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, Article No. 2704. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172898

Tchente Nguefack, C., Biwole, M.E., Massom, A., Kamgaing, J.T., Njamen, T.N., Ekane, G.H., Obinchemti, T.E. and Priso, E.B. (2012) Epidemiology and Surgical Management of Breast Cancer in Gynecological Department of Douala General Hospital. The Pan African Medical Journal, 13, Article No. 35.

Dem, A., Traoré, B., Dieng, M.M., et al. (2006) Les cancers gynécologiques et mammaires à l’Institut du cancer de Dakar. Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones/Santé, 18, 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1684/san.2008.0093

Darré, T., Amegbor, K., Sonhayé, L., Kouyate, M., Aboubarak, A., N’Timo, B., et al. (2013) Histo-Epidemiological Profile of Breast Cancers: About 450 Cases Observed at the CHU of Lomé. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 60, 53-58.

Sando, Z., Fouogue Tsuala, J., Fouelifack Ymele, F.Y., Fouedjio, J.H., Mboudou, T. and Essame Oyono, J. (2014) Profile of Gynecological and Breast Cancers in Yaoundé-Cameroon. The Pan African Medical Journal, 17, Article No. 28. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.28.3447

Esson Mapoko, B.S., Atenguena, O., Esther Dina, B.M., Anne Juliette, F.S., et al. (2023) Determinants of Prolonged Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis at Yaoundé General Hospital. Pan African Medical Journal, 44, Article No. 1.

Cucinotta, E., Calbo, L., Palmeri, R., Pergolizzi, F.P. and Melita, G. (1996) Bilateral Carcinoma of the Breast. Chirurgia Italiana, 49, 9-14.

Togo, A., Traore, A., Traore, C., Dembele, B.T., Kante, L., Diakite, I., et al. (2010) Breast Cancer in Two Hospitals in Bamako (Mali, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects). Journal Africain du Cancer, 2, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12558-010-0060-x

Echimane, A.K., Ahnoux, A.A., Adoubi, I., Hien, S., M’Bra, K., D’Horpock, A., et al. (2000) Cancer Incidence in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Cancer, 89, 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<653::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-Z

Adani-Ifè, A., Amégbor, K., Doh, K. and Darré, T. (2020) Breast Cancer in Togolese Women: Immunohistochemistry Subtypes. BMC Women’s Health, 20, Article No. 261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01130-2

Millikan, R.C., Newman, B., Tse, C.K., Moorman, P.G., Conway, K., Smith, L.V., et al. (2007) Epidemiology of Basal-Like Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 109, 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9632-6

Howlader, N., Altekruse, S.F., Li, C.I., Chen, V.W., Clarke, C.A., Ries, L.A.G., et al. (2014) US Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Joint Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106, dju055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju055

Titloye, N.A., Foster, A., Omoniyi-Esan, G.O., Komolafe, A.O., Daramola, A.O., Adeoye, O.A., et al. (2016) Histological Features and Tissue Microarray Taxonomy of Nigerian Breast Cancer Reveal Predominance of the High-Grade Triple-Negative Phenotype. Pathobiology, 83, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441949

Tamimi, R.M., Baer, H.J., Marotti, J., Galan, M., Galaburda, L., Fu, Y., et al. (2008) Comparison of Molecular Phenotypes of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 10, R67. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2128