<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJU</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Urology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-5440</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oju.2023.138033</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJU-127033</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Direct Visual Internal Urethrotomy (DVIU) in the Management of Male Urethral Strictures. A Single Center Experience about 44 Patients
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoul-Karim</surname><given-names>Paré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tioulé</surname><given-names>Mamadou Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Delphine</surname><given-names>Yé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moahmed</surname><given-names>Simporé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mickael</surname><given-names>Rouamba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fasnéwindé</surname><given-names>Aristide Kaboré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Timothée</surname><given-names>Kambou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Division of Urology, Souro Sanou University Hospital, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Surgery, Regional University Hospital, Ouahigouya, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Division of Urology, Yalgado Ouedraogo University Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>08</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>293</fpage><lpage>301</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Male urethral stricture is one of the oldest urological disorders. Many techniques have been proposed to treat them, including endoscopic internal urethrotomy (DVIU). 
  Material and Methods: To evaluate the contribution of this technique in the treatment of urethra narrowing, a retrospective study on the records of patients with urethral stricture treated with endoscopic internal urethrotomy between January 2014 and December 2021 in the urology division of the Souro Sanou University Teaching Hospital. 
  Results: A total of 44 male patients with urethral stricture were treated with this technique and 48 procedures were performed. The average age of the patients was 53.2 &#177; 18.2 years. The etiology of the stricture was dominated by iatrogenic, infectious, traumatic and idiopathic causes in 43.2% (n = 19), 27.3% (n = 12), 20.4 % (n = 9), and 9.1% (n = 4) respectively. The location of the stricture was bulbar in 72.7%, and the anterior penile urethra in 15.9%. The overall success rate was 72.7% with satisfactory urination without dysuria, evaluated after removal of the urinary catheter, at three months this rate fell to 69.1%, and at 6 months this rate was 67.5%. Five cases (5) of extravasation of blood or irrigation fluid into the scrotum were reported and managed conservatively as well as two (2) cases of false routes with postoperative oedema of the penis were observed. 
  Conclusion: DVIU is a simple technique, free of major morbidity and requiring only short-term hospitalization. It can be proposed as a first-line treatment for urethral stricture.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Internal Urethrotomy</kwd><kwd> Urethral Stricture</kwd><kwd> Outcomes</kwd><kwd> Complications</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Urethral strictures are common for urologists in Sub-Saharan Africa and constitute one of the oldest urological conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref2">2</xref>] . They are defined by a more or less extensive narrowing of the urethral lumen that impedes the free flow of urine from the bladder to the outside, regardless of its location and etiology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref4">4</xref>] . If infectious causes are declining in developed countries, in favor of post-traumatic and iatrogenic causes, urethral strictures are increasingly observed in our context, and their management remains a challenge for the urologist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref5">5</xref>] . Many techniques have been proposed to treat urethral strictures, including internal endoscopic urethrotomy. It was described by Maisonneuve and Otis, who performed it blindly, and later by Saches who, in 1973, developed the method under direct visual control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref6">6</xref>] . Since then, DVIU has become the first-line treatment for urethral strictures for most authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] . Several studies have been carried out on the contribution of endoscopic internal urethrotomy in the management of urethral strictures. Dj&#233; et al. in the Ivory Coast conducted a study on 140 patients and Zango et al. in a previous study in Burkina Faso had evaluated the feasibility of this technique and the short-term results in a short hospital series in the management of urethral strictures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] . This study was initiated to evaluate the contribution of this technique in the management of male urethral strictures at the Souro Sanou University Hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in a single center, the urology division of the Souro Sanou University Hospital in Bobo Dioulasso between January 1<sup>st</sup>, 2014, and December 31<sup>st</sup>, 2021. The study focused on patients’ medical records treated with endoscopic internal urethrotomy. Patients included in the study had a diagnosis of urethral stricture based on preoperative imaging by retrograde urethrogram (RUG) or Voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG) with negative urine culture and were treated by DVIU. The included patients were those without spongiofibrosis or urethrocutaneous fistulas. For each patient, the collected data included patient demographics, the cause of urethral stricture, stricture characteristics, operative details and follow-up information. The DVIU was performed using a cold knife urethrotome, by incising the stricture at 12 o’clock under endoscopic guidance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The procedure was carried out under locoregional anesthesia with indwelling urethral catheter, which was left in place for three to seven days. In the absence of uroflowmetry, postoperative functional results were evaluated based on the quality of urination immediately after removal of the urinary catheter, at three months (3 months) and six months (6 months). Thus, these results were classified into three categories:</p><p>&#183; Good: absence of dysuria, easy urination with a good urinary stream</p><p>&#183; Satisfactory: slight dysuria, urination with effort, weak urinary stream</p><p>&#183; Failure: frank dysuria, difficult or impossible urination</p><p>The procedure was considered successful if there was absence of symptoms or</p><p>signs of recurrent stricture and if patient had ability to pass urine. The overall success rate took into account the functional postoperative results judged as good and satisfactory. Data were analyzed using Epi.Info software version 7 and results displayed using tables and figures. Descriptive statistics for numerical variables in our study are given as mean &#177; standard deviation and the categorical data are given as frequency (n) and percentage (%).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>1) Frequency</p><p>The hospital frequency of urethral strictures (US) accounted for 11.15% of all urological pathologies during the study period. During the study period, 44 patients underwent DVIU out of a total of 471 recorded cases of urethral strictures, representing a proportion of 9.34%. Four patients have needed a second procedure for treatment, with a total of 48 procedures performed. The annual frequency of DVIU was 6 procedures per year.</p><p>2) Age and residence of the patients:</p><p>The mean age of the patients was 53.2 &#177; 18.2 years with extreme ages ranging from 18 to 80 years old.</p><p>3) Residence of the patients</p><p>54.5% (24/44) of the patients came from rural areas while 45.5% (20/44) came from urban areas.</p><p>4) Professional occupation</p><p>The majority of patients (47.2%) were farmers, followed by retired and traders in equal proportions (18.2%), civil servants (9.2%) and students (6.7%). Professional occupation of patient is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>5) Causes of urethral strictures.</p><p>The causes of urethral strictures were predominantly iatrogenic, accounting for 43.2% (n = 19) followed by infectious causes (27.3%), traumatic causes (20.4%), and idiopathic causes (9.1%) as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive characteristics of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Patient and stricturecharacteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.2 &#177; 18.2 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Traders</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Civil servants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Place of residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stricture aetiology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Iatrogenic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Infectious</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Traumatic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stricture location</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Bulbar urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Perineobulbar urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Penile urethra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>6) Reasons for patient consultation</p><p>The main reasons for patient consultation were urinary retention, whether acute or chronic (47.7%), dysuria (40.9%), and infectious complications such as urinary tract infections or orchi-epididymitis (6.8%).</p><p>7) Preoperative imaging of urethral Stricture by RUG or VCUG</p><p>The retrograde urethrogram (RUG) or Voiding urethrocystogram (VCUG) were performed in all patients and allowed for the confirmation of the diagnosis of urethral stricture by specifying the number of strictures, their location, and associated anomalies. A single urethral stricture was found in 36 patients (81.8%), while 8 patients (18.2%) presented with multiple strictures, illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The location of the stricture was bulbar in 32 patients (72.7%), perineal-bulbar in 5 patients (11.4%), and anterior penile in 7 patients (15.9%) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. RUG images revealed associated anomalies in the form of bladder diverticulum in three (3) patients, four (4) patients had vesicoureteral reflux, and five (5) cases of trabeculated bladder were noted.</p><p>8) Mode of anesthesia</p><p>Rachi anesthesia was the main mode of anesthesia in 38 patients (86.4%) and general anesthesia in 6 patients (13.6%). Antibiotic prophylaxis was systematically applied to all patients.</p><p>9) Procedure occurrence</p><p>Single DVIU was performed as a first-line procedure in 40 of our patients (90.9%) and four patients (9.1%) required a second endoscopic internal urethrotomy.</p><p>10) Hospital stay</p><p>The average hospital stay was 4.2 days &#177; 3.2 days, with extremes of 1 day and 14 days.</p><p>11) Post-operative functional results</p><p>Postoperative functional results were evaluated based on the quality of micturition after removal of the urinary catheter as uroflowmetry was not available in our urology division. The overall success rate (good and satisfactory results) at the removal of the urinary catheter was 72.7%. This rate fell to 69.1%, at three months and to 67.5% after 6 months. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> was summarized the distribution of patients according to the final functional outcome of the DVIU.</p><p>12) Postoperative complications</p><p>During the procedure, five cases (5) of extravasation of blood or irrigation</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the outcome of the procedure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Success rate at the removal of urinary catheter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Success rate evaluated at 3 months</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Success rate evaluated at 6 months</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Global success</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (72.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (69.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (67.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (27.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (30.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (33.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42* (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40* (100%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Two (2) patients were lost to follow-up at the 3 months postoperative visit and four (4) at the 6 months postoperative visit.</p><p>fluid into the scrotum were reported and two (2) cases of false routes with postoperative edema of the penis were observed. Cases of liquid infiltration of the scrotum were treated by incisions for draining the subcutaneous tissue with the evacuation of the irrigation fluid by compression of the scrotum, followed by a suspensory scrotal dressing and treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs and prophylactic antibiotics. No cases of death were reported in our series.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Urethral stricture remains a relatively common condition in developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] . Over eight years of surgical activities, our department recorded 471 cases of urethral strictures, and 44 patients were treated with endoscopic internal urethrotomy. This minimally invasive technique, introduced into our arsenal of management, constitutes the second endoscopic procedure after cystoscopies. The annual frequency of performing this procedure is 6 DVIU/year, which is lower than the 10 cases annually reported by Zango B. et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] in the same urology division, and the 22 cases annually reported by Dj&#233; K. in Abidjan and Guirrassy in Conakry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] . Therefore, it appears that the DVIU rate has decreased in our urology division due to the difficulties encountered in better organizing and conducting endoscopic activities, including recurrent breakdowns of the endoscopy column and the availability of consumables to ensure the continuity of endoscopic activities. The indications for endoscopic internal urethrotomy remain mainly for young patients, as found in many studies on this technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref10">10</xref>] . The patients in our series were relatively young with a mean age of 53.2 &#177; 18.2 years, slightly higher than the average age of 47.8 years reported by Zango et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] and lower than the average age reported by Dj&#233; et al. which was 55 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] . The main etiologies found in our series were endo-urethral maneuvers, urethral infections, and pelvic trauma. Specifically, we recorded 43.2% of iatrogenic etiologies, which differed from the results reported by Zango et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] , who found a predominance of infectious etiologies in their study. Culty et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref11">11</xref>] at Bichat Hospital in Paris reported 105 cases of traumatic urethral strictures, exclusively dominated by pelvic fractures and perineal trauma. The predominance of post-infectious etiology related to poorly or untreated urethritis is fairly constant in the literature for developing countries, especially in Africa. Thus Dj&#233; in C&#244;te d’Ivoire, Guirassy in Guinea, Zango in Burkina Faso all reported the predominance of infectious etiology in their respective series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] . A possible explanation for this difference could be the recent decline of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in most African countries, including Burkina Faso, which previously had a high prevalence of acute gonococcal urethritis. This decline in STI prevalence is likely due to the efforts of various programs to combat STIs/HIV through multiple information and communication campaigns aimed at behavior change. In our series, the preferred location of the stricture was bulbar, accounting for 72.7% of cases, which was consistent with literature data reported by many authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref13">13</xref>] . This preference may be related to the particular anatomy of this segment of the anterior urethra, with the bulbar cul-de-sac serving as a reservoir where germs proliferate due to stasis. Similar results were reported by Dj&#233; et al. with 67.9% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] , Benjelloun M et al. in Morocco with 73.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref12">12</xref>] , and L. Red&#243;n-G&#225;lvez et al. with 64.2% bulbar location [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref4">4</xref>] . Post-traumatic strictures would more frequently, if not exclusively, occur at the level of the membranous urethra due to the anatomy of this segment of the urethra, which is closely related to the perineal fascia, which is very vulnerable during pelvic trauma.</p><p>Single strictures represented a significant proportion of strictures in our study, accounting for 81.8%. Single strictures are the ideal indication for internal endoscopic urethrotomy. Our results are consistent with those of Tazy et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref1">1</xref>] in Morocco, where the majority of patients had single strictures. The treatment outcomes were evaluated based on the quality of voiding comfort and urinary stream, which were collected through patient interviews during follow-up visits. This purely clinical evaluation is quite subjective since we did not use uroflowmetry to assess postoperative results, and only a few patients underwent control urethrocystography (VCUG). The success rate of endoscopic internal urethrotomy (DVIU) assessed at the time of removal of the urinary catheter in our patients was 72.7%. This rate decreased to 69.1% at three (3) months and 67.5% at six (6) months. The lack of follow-up and the absence of 4 patients at the 6-month postoperative control contributed to the decrease of our success rates. Our 72.7% success rate remained close to that of Zango, which was 67% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] in Burkina Faso, and higher than Ballanger’s 57% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref2">2</xref>] in France. DVIU is considered to be a procedure with very few complications, but it still carries risks and potential complications. Seven (7) perioperative complications were noted in our series, representing 21.8%, which is higher than the 9% reported by Guirrassy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref3">3</xref>] . These complications were mainly due to false routes, with swelling of the penis and fluid infiltration of the scrotum. In Zango’s study, the complication rate was about 16%, also dominated by false routes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] . In contrast to Chilton et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref14">14</xref>] , we did not report any complications such as incontinence or impotence. Similarly, we did not report any cases of urethrotome blade breakage, as reported by Steenkamp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref5">5</xref>] at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa, an incident also reported by Zango [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref8">8</xref>] in Burkina Faso and Dj&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref7">7</xref>] in C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Mortality was zero in our series, confirming the safety of this intervention as reported by other authors in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127033-ref15">15</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Direct visual internal urethrotomy is a simple, quick procedure, devoid of major morbidity and requiring only a short hospital stay. It can be proposed as a first-line treatment for urethral strictures when local conditions permit, as recommended by most urologic societies.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ouattara, A., Par&#233;, A.-K., Traor&#233;, T.M., Y&#233;, D., Simpor&#233;, M., Rouamba, M., Kabor&#233;, F.A. and Kambou, T. (2023) Direct Visual Internal Urethrotomy (DVIU) in the Management of Male Urethral Strictures. A Single Center Experience about 44 Patients. Open Journal of Urology, 13, 293-301. https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2023.138033</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127033-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tazi, K., Nouri, M., Moudouni, S., Koutani, A., Benatyaa, A. and Hachimi, M. (2000) Treatment of Inflammatory Urethral Strictures by Endoscopic Urethrotomy. Annales d’Urologie, 34, 184-188.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ballanger, P., Midy, D., Vely, J.F. and Ballanger, R. (1983) Results of Endoscopic Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Urethral Strictures. A propos de 72 observations. Journal of Urology, 89, 95-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guirrassy, S., Simakan, N.F., Sow, K.B., Balde, S., Bah, I., Diabate, I. and Diallo, M.B. (2001) Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Male Urethral Strictures at the Urology Department of CHU Ignace Deen. Annales d’Urologie, 35, 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4401(01)00022-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Redon-Galvez, L., Molina-Escudero, R., Alvarez-Ardura, M., Otaola-Arca, H., Alarcon Parra, R.O. and Páez-Borda, A. (2016) Predictors of Urethral Stricture Recurrence after Endoscopic Urethrotomy. Actas Urológicas Espa&amp;#241;olas, 40, 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2016.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steenkamp, J.W., Heynes, C.F. and De Kock, M.L.S. (1997) Internal Urethrotomy versus Dilation as Treatment for Male Urethral Strictures: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison. Journal of Urology, 157, 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65296-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heyns, C.F., Steenkamp, J.W., De Kock, M.L. and Whitaker, P. (1998) Treatment of Male Urethral Strictures: Is Repeated Dilation or Internal Urethrotomy Useful? Journal of Urology, 160, 356-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62894-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djé, K., Coulibaly, A., Coulibaly, N. and Sangaré, I.S. (1999) Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Acquired Black Urethral Stricture in African Men. About 140 Cases. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 46, 56-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zango, B., Kambou, T. and Sanou, A. (2003) Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy for Urethral Stricture Acquired at Bobo-Dioulasso Hospital: Feasibility of the Technique in Precarious Conditions and Short-Term Results. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 96, 92-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abourachid, H., Louis, D., Goudot, B., Dahamani, F., Hakami, F. and Daker, N. (1989) Internal Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Urethral Strictures. Journal of Urology, 95, 477-480.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benizri, E., Chevallier, D., Quintens, H., Fabiani, P., Degraeve, B., Amiel, J., Raymond, G. and Toubol, J. (1992) Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy: Retrospective Study of 132 Observations. Progrès en Urologie, 2, 623-627.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Culty, T., Ravery, V., Boccon-Gibod, L. (2007) Post-Traumatic Urethral Strictures: About 105 Cases. Progrès en Urologie, 17, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1166-7087(07)92231-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benjelloun, M., Drissi, M., Makhloufi, M., Nouri, A., Karmouni, T., Tazi, K., et al. (2008) Treatment of Urethral Strictures by Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy: Anatomical and Functional Results of a Series of 244 Cases. African Journal of Urology, 14, 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12301-008-0002-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chebil, M., Horchani, A. and Zmerli, S. (1987) Assessment of the Results of Endoscopic Internal Urethrotomy in the Treatment of Urethral Stricture. About 163 Controlled Cases. Journal of Urology, 93, 25-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chilton, C., Shah, P., Fowler, C., Titaft, E. and Blandy, J. (1983) The Impact of Optical Urethrotomy on the Management of Urethral Strictures. The British Journal of Urology, 55, 705-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1983.tb03410.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127033-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walter, P.C., Parsons, C.L. and Schmidt, J.D. (1980) Direct Vision Internal Urethrotomy in the Management of Urethral Strictures. Journal of Urology, 123, 497-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55988-1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>