<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2023.148065</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-126860</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Acid-Phosphorus Activity of Wheat Varieties Rhizobacteria of Uzbekistan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zair</surname><given-names>Saatovich Shakirov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Iskandar</surname><given-names>Takhirovich Yakubov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Karomat</surname><given-names>Suvanqulovna Mamanazarova</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mardanov</surname><given-names>Ikrom Xasan Ugli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xayrullaev</surname><given-names>Abdumalik</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institute of Botany, National University of Uzbekistan Named after Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>977</fpage><lpage>986</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this work, local strains of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms were isolated and identified from the wheat rhizosphere and exogenous acid phosphatase enzymes of locally active phosphate- and potassium-mobilizing rhizobacteria belonging to the genera 
  <em>Escherichia, Rahnella, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas,</em> and 
  <em>Pantoea</em> were studied. The efficiency of the physiological properties of rhizobacteria is determined by the production of soluble phosphorus, and the amount of phosphorus depends on the activity and biomass of bacteria that secrete phosphorus. This is done by phosphate solubilizing bacteria, and the habitat ecosystem is enriched with beneficial micronutrients. In these studies, active rhizobacteria activity of acid phosphatase in nutrient liquid was studied at different temperatures. Optimum pH activity index and temperature variability of enzymes were determined. It should be noted that in the most active phosphate-solubilizing strains the maximum enzymatic activity was observed in the culture fluid of 
  <em>R. aquatilis</em> strain 17, which produced 1.086 μmol p-nitrophenol μmol/min/ml. P. agglomerans 22, P. agglomerans 20 and Ps. kilonensis 32 cultures phosphatase activity was 0.143 - 0.680 p-nitrophenol μmol/min/ml. It should be noted that the phosphatase activity of bacteria belonging to the same genus and species was very different from each other. That is, the enzyme activity of 
  <em>Rahnella aquatilis</em> strain 17 was 9 times higher than the enzyme activity of 
  <em>Rahnella aquatilis</em> strain 9. The pH optimum of sour phosphatase enzymes in Rahnella aquatilis strain 16 was 6.0. The optimum temperature of acid phosphatase activity was 45
  &amp;#730;C and 50
  &amp;#730;C. The reason for this may be that the strains were isolated in different soil and climate conditions. When the acid phosphatase activity of 
  <em>R. aquatilis</em> 3, 9, 
  <em>E. cloacae</em> 8 and 
  <em>P. agglomerans</em> 22 cultures was determined at a temperature of 45
  &amp;#730;C, it was observed that the enzyme activity increased by 2 - 4 times. 
  <em>Es. hermannii</em> 1, 
  <em>Ps. kilonensis</em> 26 and 
  <em>B. simplex</em> 28 bacteria acid phosphatase activity was not significantly affected by temperature rise.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Rhizobacteria</kwd><kwd> Phosphate Mobilization</kwd><kwd> Nitrogen Fixation</kwd><kwd> Acid Phosphatase</kwd><kwd> Wheat</kwd><kwd> Strains</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Today, the productivity of agricultural crops is indescribably dependent on chemical fertilizers. However, most of the applied phosphorus fertilizers are immobilized in the soil particles and cannot reach the plants. The large amount of high-quality phosphorite rock is required for the synthesis of manufactured chemical phosphorus fertilizers, which leads to a significant decrease in global phosphorus reserves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref1">1</xref>] . Unfortunately, the excess amount of chemical phosphorus fertilizers compensates for the lack of phosphorus in the soil, which negatively affects human health and causes many serious environmental consequences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref4">4</xref>] . Accordingly, it should be reduced in favor of finding alternative sustainable phosphorus resources to increase crop production and help solve environmental problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref5">5</xref>] . In this case, an alternative to the existing chemical methods of obtaining phosphorus is the possibility of direct microbiological extraction of phosphates from insoluble raw materials through bacteria. This, in turn, is based on the production of organic acids by bacteria and the use of phosphatase enzyme activity. However, the lack of understanding of microbiological and chemical processes can present many challenges, including the enzyme activity of bacteria and especially rhizobacteria, their optimal levels, changes in temperature and pH.</p><p>It should be noted that the mineralization of organic phosphorus occurs under the influence of various phosphatases, including phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase and phosphotriesterase enzymes, which catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphoric acid esters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref6">6</xref>] . It has been reported that phosphate solubilization and mineralization can occur with the same bacterial strain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref7">7</xref>] . In addition to supplying plants with phosphorus, phosphate-dissolving bacteria activate the process of nitrogen fixation and also provide plants with trace elements (Co, Mo, Fe, Zn) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref8">8</xref>] . The ability of rhizosphere bacteria to solubilize phosphate is specific to a particular plant or soil type. Calcareous soils contain a large amount of soluble phosphorus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Soil microorganisms enhance the uptake of nutrients by plants. They participate in a wide range of biological processes, including the transformation of non-resolvable food particles in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref10">10</xref>] . This biological process plays an important role in phosphorus cycling. Different groups of enzymes are involved in this. The first groups of enzymes are those that dephosphorylate the phosphor-ester or phosphoanhydride bond of organic compounds. They are non-specific acid phosphatases (HCaP’s). The most studied among these HCaP’s enzymes released by PSM, are the phosphomonoesterases also referred to as phosphatases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref11">11</xref>] . Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria may also aid the growth of plants by stimulating the efficiency of biological nitrogen fixation, synthesizing phytohormones and enhancing the availability of some trace elements such as zinc and iron [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Phosphorus (P) is the second-most important nutrient after nitrogen in terms of plant growth and development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>The phosphatase enzyme is present in all types of flora and fauna, only its activity has been observed to be different in different plant and animal tissues, as well as in microorganisms. Phosphatases are phosphodiesterase enzymes that break phosphodiester bonds (C-O-P) in organic substances. As a result of phosphatase activity, a phosphorus ion and a free hydroxyl group are formed due to the breaking of monoether bonds of an organic substrate containing phosphorus. Phosphatase enzymes can be acidic or alkaline phosphatases depending on their optimal pH value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref17">17</xref>] . Bacterial acid phosphatases are often released from the cell as exoenzymes or stored as membrane-bound proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref18">18</xref>] . Also, acid phosphatases act in the phosphorus supply system of bacteria and play an important role in survival in the host’s organism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref19">19</xref>] . A special classification for phosphatases was proposed in order to study the role and function of non-specific types of heterogeneous phosphatases and to compare them with each other [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref20">20</xref>] . Through this system, phosphatases were classified into subgroups based on their resistance to certain chemicals such as sodium tartrate, sodium molybdate, and EDTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref21">21</xref>] , as well as their molecular weight and tetramer, dimer, and monomer form. Many procarotid pathogens have been found to produce acid phosphatase and purple acid phosphatase, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium Shigella sp, Morganella sp, leprae, Salmonella sp, Providencia sp, Francisella tularensis and Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref22">22</xref>] . Studies show that the enzyme acid phosphatase plays an important role in the survival of bacteria in the host plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref23">23</xref>] . Acid phosphatase enzyme of bacteria is contained in cell wall and cell surface polysaccharides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref24">24</xref>] . Many sour phosphatase-producing bacteria have been found to have plant growth-stimulating, antagonistic and phosphate-mobilizing properties against plant pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Active phosphate-mobilizing magal rhizobacteria belonging to the genera Escherichia, Rahnella, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas and Pantoea were grown aerobically in MPB nutrient medium at 28˚C for 3 days. Then, the bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 6000 g for 20 min to extract the culture fluid. (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was added to the culture liquid up to 70% and left in a refrigerator at 4˚C for 24 hours. The precipitate formed in the culture liquid was separated by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 20 min. The separated precipitate was dissolved in 500 mM phosphate buffer (рН 4.5) and dialyzed. The semi-purely isolated bacterial enzyme extract serves as a material for the determination of sour phosphatase activity and for the pure isolation of the phosphatase enzyme. The reaction mixture for the determination of acid phosphatase activity consisted of: 3.0 ml of sodium acetate buffer (500 mM, pH 5.0), 30 μl of paranitrophenyl phosphate (65 mM), 0.1 ml of MgCl<sub>2</sub> (10 mM). 1.0 ml to the enzymatic reaction mixture begins with the addition of enzyme extract. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37˚C for 15 min. The reaction was quenched by adding 0.5 mL of 1 M NaOH, and the p-nitrophenyl formed was measured at 405 nm. The reaction mixture without enzyme was used as a control. Acid phosphatase activity was determined by para-nitrophenol calibration curve [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>The protein content of acid phosphatase enzyme was determined by the Lowry method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref28">28</xref>] . To determine the optimal temperature of the acid phosphatase enzyme of bacteria, the reaction mixture was heated for 20 min at temperatures of 25˚C, 30˚C, 35˚C, 40˚C, 45˚C, 50˚C and 60˚C after incubation in medium, acid phosphatase activity was determined.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Determination of acid phosphatase enzyme activity of rhizobacteria showed that different strains showed different activity at 38˚C temperature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Maximum enzymatic activity was observed in Rahnella aquatilis strain 16 and was found to produce 1.086 p-nitrophenol nanomol/min/ml (product).</p><p>The phosphatase activity of Pantoea agglomerans 21, Pantoea agglomerans 19 and Pseudomonas kilonensis 32 cultures was 0.279 - 0.680 p-nitrophenol nanomol/min/ml. Acid phosphatase activity of Escherichia hermannii 1, Enterobacter</p><p>cloacae 8, Rahnella aquatilis 9 and Pseudomonas kilonensis 26 strains was 0.143 - 0.221 p-nitrophenol nanomol/min/ml.</p><p>The maximum enzymatic activity was observed in the culture fluid of R. aquatilis strain 16 and produced 1086 μmol/min. P. agglomerans 22, P. agglomerans 20 and Ps. kilonensis 32 cultures phosphatase activity was 0.143 - 0.680 p-nitrophenol nanomol/min/ml. It should be noted that the phosphatase activity of bacteria belonging to the same genus and species is very different from each other.</p><p>When the phosphatase activity of Rahnella aquatilis 3, Enterobacter cloacae 8, Rahnella aquatilis 9 and Pantoea agglomerans 21 strains was observed at a temperature of 45˚C, it was found that the enzyme activity increases by 2 - 4 times. However, acid phosphatase activity of Escherichia hermannii 1, Pseudomonas kilonensis 26 and Bacillus simplex 28 bacteria was not significantly affected by temperature (45˚C) increase. Taking into account that acid phosphatase enzymes of bacterial strains belonging to the genus Rahnella have been poorly studied at the moment, their acid phosphatases were partially purified and some catalytic properties were studied. Among rhizobacteria, Rahnella aquatilis strains 16 and 17 were noted to have high acid phosphatase activity (118 and 95 μM/min/mg). The rest of the strains had 38% - 83% of the above-mentioned activity. Acid phosphatase activity in nutrient fluids of different strains is presented below (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>From the obtained results, we can see that the AF activities of the strains were 27% - 63% compared to the catalytic activity of the highest strains. Rahnella aquatilis 16 was used for partial purification of acid phosphatase enzyme from nutrient fluids. After this step, the protein concentration in Rahnella aquatilis 16 enzyme preparations was 0.99 mg/ml. After this step, the protein concentration in Rahnella aquatilis 16 enzyme preparations was 0.99 mg/ml. At this stage, the relative activity of sour phosphatase enzyme is 118 &#181;M/min/mg increased to 666 &#181;M/min/mg. At the same time, 54.2 percent of the total activity of the enzyme was recovered (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sour produced by Rahnella aquatilis strain 16 partial purification of phosphatase</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein, mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >General activity, U</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Relative activity, U/mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cleaning time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results, %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Culture fluid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonium sulfate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >666</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A partially purified enzyme preparation of Rahnella aquatilis strain 16 was used to study their catalytic properties. The study of the phosphatase enzyme activity of Rahnella aquatilis strain 16 depending on the pH medium showed its activity in the pH range of 4.5 - 6.0. The highest activity was recorded for Rahnella aquatilis 16 enzyme at pH 5.5 - 6.0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Acid phosphatase enzymes showed almost no activity at pH values of 4, 7 and 8 of the reaction medium.</p><p>Study of the activity of sour phosphatase preparations of Rahnella aquatilis 16 and strains depending on the temperature of the reaction medium. Good results were noted when the optimal temperature for Rahnella aquatilis 16 enzyme was in the range of 40˚C - 45˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Also, when the acid phosphatase activity of R. aquatilis 3, R. aquatilis 9, E. cloacae 8 and P. agglomerans 22 cultures was determined at a temperature of 45˚C, it was observed that the enzyme activity increased by 2 - 4 times. Es. hermannii 1, Ps. kilonensis 26 and B. simplex 28 did not significantly affect the activity of sour phosphatase by increasing the temperature.</p><p>To determine the thermostability of acid phosphatases, 0.2 ml of enzyme solutions were incubated at different temperatures for 10 minutes, and then the relative activity of enzymes was determined (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>In the obtained results, it was observed that the enzyme of Rahnella aquatilis strain 16 retains 15% - 20% activity at a temperature of 80˚C.</p><p>During the research, it was found that the enzyme activity of Rahnella aquatilis 17 strain is 9 times higher than the enzyme activity of Rahnella aquatilis 9 Enterobacter cloacae 18 strains. The pH optimum of Rahnella aquatilis 16 phosphatase enzymes was 6.0. The optimal temperature of acid phosphatase activity was 45˚C - 50˚C, which may be due to the fact that the strains were isolated from different soil and climate conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that rhizobacterial acid phosphatases have high catalytic activity in culture fluids and partially purified enzyme preparations. They have also been found to be temperature resistant.</p><p>Using Rahnella aquatilis 16 for partial purification of the acid phosphatase enzyme from nutrient fluids with ammonium sulfate salt, 0.99 mg of protein was isolated from 100 ml of culture fluid. During the reaction, the relative activity of acid phosphatase increased from 118 μM/min/mg to 666 μM/min/mg. At the same time, 54.2 percent of the total enzyme activity was restored.</p><p>When carrying out the enzymatic activity of the phosphatase of the strain Rahnella aquatilis 16, depending on the pH of the medium, it showed that at pH 4.5 - 6.0. Its activity is in the range. The highest activity was registered for the enzyme Rahnella aquatilis 16 at pH 5.5 - 6.0. Acid phosphatase enzymes showed almost no activity at pH 4, 7, and 8 of the reaction medium.</p><p>In further scientific research, it is important to study the effect of different nutrients on the acid phosphatase activity of rhizobacteria and the regulation of its synthesis, to isolate the acid phosphatase enzyme in pure form, and to study its physicochemical properties.</p><p>Acid phosphatase activity in nutrient liquid of active rhizobacteria was 0.119 - 1.086 p-nitrophenol μmol/min/ml at 38˚C temperature. The optimal pH of acid phosphatases of Rahnella aquatilis 16 was 6.0. The maximum activity of enzymes was shown at 45˚C.</p><p>The use of phosphorus biofertilizers is a promising approach to improving food production through enhancing agricultural yield as it is better to use an environmentally friendly approach (that is, a paradigm that emphasizes the use of biological soil amendments in place of chemicals) to solve the problems of infertile soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The nonspecific enzyme acid phosphatase is synthesized in response to stress caused by a lack of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref19">19</xref>] . To study the role and function of various nonspecific phosphatases and compare them, a specific classification of phosphatases was proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref20">20</xref>] . Within this system, phosphatases have been divided into subgroups based on their resistance to certain chemicals such as sodium tartrate, sodium molybdate, and EDTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref21">21</xref>] , as well as their molecular weight and tetramer, dimer, and monomer form. Many procarotid pathogens have been found to produce acid phosphatase and purple acid phosphatase, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium Shigella sp, Morganella sp, leprae, Salmonella sp, Providencia sp, Francisella tularensis, and Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref22">22</xref>] . Studies show that the enzyme acid phosphatase plays an important role in the survival of bacteria in the host plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref21">21</xref>] . The enzyme bacterial acid phosphatase is present in cell walls and cell surface polysaccharides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref24">24</xref>] . It was found that many acid phosphatase producing bacteria have plant growth stimulating, antagonistic and phosphate mobilizing properties against phytopathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126860-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Based on the above, our research has great scientific and practical significance in studying the exogenous enzyme acid phosphatase (AP) of indigenous rhizobacteria.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shakirov, Z.S., Yakubov, I.T., Mamanazarova, K.S., Ugli, M.I.X. and Abdumalik, X. (2023) Acid-Phosphorus Activity of Wheat Varieties Rhizobacteria of Uzbekistan. Agricultural Sciences, 14, 977-986. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.148065</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126860-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordell, D. and White, S. (2014) Life’s Bottleneck: Sustaining the World’s Phosphorus for a Food Secure Future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 161-188. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-010213-113300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López-Arredondo, D.L., Leyva-González, M.A., González-Morales, S.I., López-Bucio, J. and Herrera-Estrella, L. (2014) Phosphate Nutrition: Improving Low-Phosphate Tolerance in Crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65, 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shepherd, J.G., Kleemann, R., Bahri-Esfahani, J., Hudek, L., Suriyagoda, L., Vandamme, E. and van Dijk, K.C. (2016) The Future of Phosphorus in Our Hands. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 104, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9742-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grenon, G., Singh, B., De Sena, A., Madramootoo, C.A., von Sperber, C., Goyal, M.K. and Zhang, T.Q. (2021) Phosphorus Fate, Transport and Management on Subsurface Drained Agricultural Organic Soils: A Review. Environmental Research Letters, 16, Article ID: 013004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abce81</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nash, D.M., Haygarth, P.M., Turner, B.L., Condron, L.M., McDowell, R.W., Richardson, A.E., Watkins, M. and Heaven, M.W. (2014) Using Organic Phosphorus to Sustain Pasture Productivity: A Perspective. Geoderma, 221, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodriguez, H. and Fraga, R. (1999) Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Their Role in Plant Growth Promotion. Biotechnology Advances, 17, 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tao, G.C., Tian, S.J., Cai, M.Y. and Xie, G.H. (2008) Phosphate-Solubilizing and Mineralizing Abilities of Bacteria Isolated from Soils. Pedosphere, 18, 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60042-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ponmurugan, P., Gopi, C. and Ponmurugan, P. (2006) In Vitro Production of Growth Regulators and Phosphatase Activity by Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 348-350.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gyaneshwar, P., Naresh Kumar, L.J. and Parekh, P.P.S. (2002) Role of Soil Microorganisms in Improving P Nutrition of Plants. Plant Soil, 245, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020663916259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babalola, O.O. and Glick, B.R. (2012) Indigenous African Agriculture and Plant Associated Microbes: Current Practice and Future Transgenic Prospects. Scientific Research and Essays, 7, 2431-2439. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE11.1714</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nannipieri, P., Giagnoni, L., Landi, L. and Renella, G. (2011) Role of Phosphatase Enzymes in Soil. In: Bunemann, E., Oberson, A. and Frossard, E., Eds., Phosphorus in Action: Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling, Springer, Berlin, 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9_9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wani, P.A., Khan, M.S. and Zaidi, A. (2007) Co-Inoculation of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria to Promote Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Chickpea. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 55, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.55.2007.3.7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alori, E.T., Glick, B.R. and Babalola, O.O. (2017) Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, Article No. 971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalayu, G. (2019) Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms: Promising Approach as Biofertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy, 2019, Article ID: 4917256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4917256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitra, D., An&amp;#273;elkovi&amp;#263;, S., Panneerselvam, P., Senapati, A., Vasi&amp;#263;, T., Ganeshamurthy, A.N., Chauhan, M., Uniyal, N., Mahakur, B. and Radha, T.K. (2020) Phosphate-Solubilizing Microbes and Biocontrol Agent for Plant Nutrition and Protection: Current Perspective. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51, 645-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1729379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pradhan, A., Pahari, A., Mohapatra, S. and Mishra, B.B. (2017) Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Sustainable Agriculture: Genetic Mechanism and Application. In: Adhya, T.K., et al., Eds., Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects, Springer, Berlin, 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7380-9_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macaskie, L.E., Bonthrone, K.M., Yong, P. and Goddard, D.T. (2000) Enzymically Mediated Bioprecipitation of Uranium by a Citrobacter sp.: A Concerted Role for Exocellular Lipopolysaccharide and Associated Phosphatase in Biomineral Formation. Microbiology, 146, 1855-1867. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-8-1855</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uerkvitz, W. and Beck, C.F. (1981) Periplasmic Phosphatases in Salmonella typhimurium LT2. A Biochemical, Physiological, and Partial Genetic Analysis of Three Nucleoside Monophosphate Dephosphorylating Enzymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 256, 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)70147-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fields, P.I., Groisman, E.A. and Hefron, F. (1989) A Salmonella Locus That Controls Resistance to Microbicidal Proteins from Phagocytic Cells. Science, 243, 1059-1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2646710</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rossolini, G.M., Schippa, S., Riccio, M.L., Berlutti, F., Macaskie, L.E. and Thaller, M.C. (1998) Bacterial Nonspecific Acid Phosphohydrolases: Physiology, Evolution and Use as Tools in Microbial Biotechnology. Cellular &amp; Molecular Life Sciences, 54, 833-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000180050212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguirre-García, M.M., Cerbón, J. and Talamás-Rohana, P. (2000) Purification and Properties of an Acid Phosphatase from Entamoeba histolytica HM-1:IMSS. International Journal of Parasitology, 30, 585-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00032-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mennan, C. (2010) Bacterial Acid Phosphatase and Its Application to Waste Remediation and Metal Recovery. 244 p. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1631446.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schenk, G., Korsinczky, M.L.J., Hume, D.A., Hamilton, S. and De Jersey, J. (2000) Purple Acid Phosphatases from Bacteria: Similarities to Mammalian and Plant Enzymes. Gene, 255, 419-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00305-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beneduzi, A., Ambrosini, A. and Passaglia, L.M.P. (2012) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their Potential as Antagonists and Biocontrol Agents. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 35, 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakker, P.A.H.M., Pieterse, C.M.J. and van Loon, L.C. (2007) Induced Systemic Resistance by Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology, 97, 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-2-0239</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Vleesschauwer, D. and H&amp;#246;fte, M. (2009) Rhizobacteria Induced Systemic Resistance. Advances in Botanical Research, 51, 223-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(09)51006-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Segi, Y. (1983) Methods of Soil Microbiology. Kolos, Moscow, 296 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126860-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowry, O.H., Rosenbrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951) Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>