<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1110381</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-126626</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Involvement of Women in the Production of Doctoral Dissertations in Education in Andalusian Universities
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>Maz-Machado</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>María</surname><given-names>Josefa Rodríguez-Baiget</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ana</surname><given-names>María Antiduelo-García</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gema</surname><given-names>Linde</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Espa&amp;amp;ntilde;a</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Research in educational aspects is crucial in contemporary society due to the continuous scientific and social changes. Doctoral dissertations are a source of information on various patterns of educational research, as well as trends and preferred lines of scientific research. A bibliometric study of doctoral dissertations on education carried out in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia in the period 2010 to 2021 is presented. A total of 951 dissertations were analyzed using bibliometric techniques and network analysis. A large drop in doctoral production was observed in recent years, and the University of Granada emerges as the driving institution of educational research in Andalusia.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Doctoral Dissertations</kwd><kwd> Education</kwd><kwd> University</kwd><kwd> Gender</kwd><kwd> Andalusia</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Research on educational issues is not only a constant in university systems, but it is also a huge source of data and provides to the society and the educational system itself ideas, proposals, and diagnostics on various aspects of education. All this is because education is the fundamental pillar of any society and for the integral development of individuals. Education is an instrument that society uses to foment the coexistence and to promote scientific, technological, and humanistic development.</p><p>There are various techniques and methodological strategies to carry out effective research of all types, and this is also applicable to educational research. Bibliometrics is a technique used to observe research in general, the relationship between whom makes science and the influence of this scientific research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref1">1</xref>] . Bibliometric studies are common in both classical sciences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref4">4</xref>] and social sciences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref7">7</xref>] and more recently in the field of arts and humanities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>On the other hand, it is an accepted fact in the academic field that the completion of a Doctoral Dissertations is a crucial aspect for the formation of new researchers, because in this way they put into play the knowledge and skills acquired to plan and carry out scientific research in or about education. They not only acquired concepts, techniques, strategies and research methodologies, but they must also be put to the test in order to achieve certain objectives.</p><p>Doctoral dissertations are a source of data in bibliometric studies both internationally and nationally. As an example, Alikina et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref10">10</xref>] analyzed doctoral dissertations on translation that were developed in Russia. In the results, they observed a predominance of references to classical works, especially Russian linguistic theories of translation. Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref11">11</xref>] analyzed Chinese doctoral dissertations on librarianship and information science using and, in this case, they focused the study on analyzing the co-occurrence of terms and content to identify the different clusters and the networks that are generated. Haque &amp; Khan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref12">12</xref>] analyzed doctoral dissertations on agriculture to carried out at Bangladesh Agricultural University over a period of twenty years (1994-2014).</p><p>In Spain, studies on doctoral dissertations are a recurring theme in scientific journals in many areas of knowledge. For example, Repiso et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref13">13</xref>] studied 404 doctoral dissertations on television carried out in Spain during the period 1976 to 2007. Fernandez-Guerrero [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref14">14</xref>] analyzed 347 dissertations on medical scientific information. Machan &amp; Portero [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref15">15</xref>] studied 1036 doctoral dissertations on radiodiagnosis carried out between 1976 and 2011. Duarte Martinez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref16">16</xref>] identified the networks generated in Spanish doctoral dissertations registered in the TESEO database, and their analysis included 237,187 dissertations carried out between the years 1976 to 2016.</p><p>In a particular form of education in the national context, several studies have been carried out on Mathematics Education doctoral dissertations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Thesis about pedagogy was analyzed by Fern&#225;ndez-Cano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref20">20</xref>] , who investigated the Spanish production over thirty years, verifying that they come to terms with some recognized bibliometric indicators.</p><p>Some studies have been carried out on educational research from a gender perspective. Mu&#241;oz-&#209;ungo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref21">21</xref>] analyzed the presence of women in educational publications in Colombia. They found that the percentage of articles with participation of women is 47.7% and that the articles signed only by women represent only 28.40% compared to those signed only by men, which represent 35.84%.</p><p>In gender studies on doctoral dissertations, Fern&#225;ndez-Guerrero et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref22">22</xref>] analyzed those carried out by women in Medicine in Spain between 1882 and 1954. According to these authors, there is evidence of a glass ceiling for women in this field, with only 1% of the total number of dissertations written by women. On the other hand, C&#225;ceres and D&#237;az [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref23">23</xref>] , in their study on women’s leadership in communication research in Spain, reviewed the participation of women in the authorship and direction of doctoral dissertations in this field. They analyzed 27,484 dissertations and found that men have directed 66%, almost twice as many dissertations as those directed by women (34%).</p><p>Maz-Machado et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref24">24</xref>] reviewed the doctoral dissertations in mathematics education carried out in Andalusian universities, they found that the dissertations directed only by women were in the majority with 48.39% compared to those directed only by men (29.03%) or those in mixed co-direction (22.58%). Hern&#225;ndez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref25">25</xref>] analyzed the production of doctoral dissertations in foreign languages in Andalusia, focusing on gender aspects. They found that there was almost parity in the direction of dissertations between men (48.55%) and women (51.45%), furthermore, it was observed that 70% of women preferred to be directed by other women more than by men or mixed directions.</p><p>Le&#243;n-Mantero et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref26">26</xref>] found that at the University of C&#243;rdoba women had only directed 23.3% of the doctoral dissertations carried out at this university, which shows a bias.</p><p>If we consider that in the academic year 2021/2022, 11606 students enrolled in the autonomous community of Andalusia in order to study some type of Master’s degree related to education and that 921 students enrolled in doctoral studies in the Andalusian framework (EDUCAbase), there is a large base of people researching in educational fields, and therefore it is possible to identify some patterns in relation to the gender of the authors of university research as well as those who direct them.</p><p>In Andalusia there are 11 universities and the study of degrees related to education in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia can be carried out in 9 of the universities. In them there are departments related to education under different names. It is a fact that the faculties of education are among those with the highest number of students enrolled and with numerous PDI teachers. During the academic year 2021/2022 in the Andalusian universities there were 1253 PDI in the areas of knowledge related to Education.</p><p>The objective of this study is to know and describe the production of doctoral dissertations on Education from a bibliometric point of view in the period 2010 to 20221. In conclusion, the aim is revealed to light the achievements of women in educational research at the doctoral level in Andalusian universities.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><p>Firstly, all the websites of Andalusian universities were consulted so as to identify the education departments. Consequently, the TESEO database was visited. Such database belongs to the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport. This contains data regarding all the PhD dissertations defended since 1976. The names of the departments for the 2010-2021 period were reviewed to control possible name changes. (https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/irGestionarConsulta.do).</p><p>All doctoral dissertations written in the departments identified were downloaded from TESEO to ensure that all dissertations to be analyzed were from education departments. In those where there were doubts, the abstract was read. These readings were carried out by the authors of the study and supervised by two experts in the areas of Didactics of Mathematics and Educational Research Methods. Variables under study are university, authorship, direction, gender of authors and directors, year of defence, and descriptors. The data searching process is displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>The information was downloaded in an Excel file to assign the biological gender of each of the authors and thesis directors according to their name. This assignment was done manually. For the analyses, the gender of each of the participants in the doctoral theses was counted and the behavior was observed at the level of each of the universities, as well as at the global level of all of them. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the example of data collected.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The analysis of the information by means of frequencies has allowed us to observe some patterns in the production of doctoral theses in education in Andalusian</p><p>universities according to the gender of both authors and directors. During the period 2010-2021 Andalusian public universities recorded 951 doctoral dissertations in the departments of education. The annual average is 79.25 dissertations per year. The highest number of dissertations took place in the years 2015 to 2017, in these two years 47.2% of the total were produced 2017 was the most productive year with 170 dissertations produced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The information was downloaded in an Excel file to assign the biological gender of each of the authors and thesis directors according to their name. This assignment was done manually.</p><p>The analysis of the production reveals that there is not a continuous growth pattern in production, after 2010 there are three distinct cycles, between the years 2011-2014, the number of doctoral dissertations is almost stable swinging between 85 and 93, then between 2015 and 2017 there is a gradual increase and finally between 2018 to 2021 there is a decrease. This decrease in the number of doctoral dissertations in education in Andalusian universities in recent years is quite remarkable, and the number of dissertations has reached a number that is lower than those defended at the beginning of the period analyzed.</p><p>The University of Granada (UGR) consists of the leading Andalusian institution in terms of production of doctoral dissertations in Education (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). This university produces 48.9% of the total, followed by the University of Seville (US) with 17.9%. Of the 10 public universities in Andalusia, 8 of them have produced dissertations in this field.</p><p>The 951 dissertations were written by 525 women (55.32%) and 424 men (44.68%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the evolution of thesis production in the period analyzed, according to the gender of the author.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Diachronic production of doctoral dissertation in Education in Andalusia according to the gender of the authors</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Men</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Women</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >949</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The maximum dissertations production by women occurred in 2017 with 96 dissertations. In the case of men, the lowest number of dissertations produced occurred in 2020 with 6. The year 2021 was the only one where men produced more dissertations than women 11 by men compared to only 7 by women. The average number of dissertations defended by men was 35.3 per year, while the average for women was 43.7 per year.</p><p>At the level of universities women have been in the majority in almost all except those with an almost anecdotal production (UCO and UAL). However, in the universities of Ja&#233;n, C&#225;diz and M&#225;laga there are almost similar values between men and women (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), while in the University of Seville women double men as authors of doctoral dissertations in education departments.</p><p>If the direction of doctoral dissertations is analyzed, it can be female if it is only one or more women, male if it is only one or more men and mixed if there are both men and women sharing the role of directing the same thesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126626-ref25">25</xref>] . The direction of doctoral dissertations of only men triples those directed only by women (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). A total of 1433 researchers participated in the supervision role, of which 72.99% were men compared to 27.01% women.</p><p>During the period studied it is observed that in all the years the directors are mostly men. Female directorships have become lower than mixed ones in the years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014 and 2018 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>At the University of Cordoba all its dissertations in education have had mixed direction, in all the others the direction of only men has been in the majority (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). In percentage terms, in the universities of Huelva and Cadiz, women-only supervisors are minimal, if not almost testimonial, and in Cordoba they are non-existent.</p><p>In the dissertations analyzed, 300 different descriptors were used, the most used being Education Organization and Planning in 155 dissertations (16.29%), followed by Higher Education and Education Sector in 113 dissertations each one (11.88%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>These descriptors according to the co-appearances in the doctoral dissertations are grouped around some thematic axes such as: languages, health, history and arts, educational planning and teacher training. In addition, we find that certain themes such as software, algebra or ethics are interrelated with some of the above.</p><p>When separating the descriptors according to the gender of the authors, although the descriptor organization and planning of education is the most used by both men and women, some differences are also observed. Women have done research in higher education in 16.57% of the dissertations while men only in 6.135. The descriptor Pedagogy is used in 15.65% of the dissertations by women while men only do so in 3.3% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Most frequently used descriptors (n ≥ 21)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Descriptors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organization and planning of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Higher education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education sector</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher preparation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pedagogy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basic education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vocational education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student assesment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational theory and methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Music and Musicology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher profession and status of teachers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher training and employement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pedagogical methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Language teaching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organization and management of educational institutions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Computer-assisted instruction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Matemathics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Special education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Language and literature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sociology of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.88</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptors most frequently used in the dissertations according to author’s gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Women</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Men</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Descriptor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Descriptor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organization and planning of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organization and planning of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Higher education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education sector</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education sector</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Experience Teacher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pedagogy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Higher education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Experience Teacher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basic education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basic education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vocational training</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student assesment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pedagogy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational theory and methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession status of the teaching profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vocational training</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher training and employement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Music and Musicology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Language teaching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pedagogical methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organization and management of educational institutions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,59</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> allows us to identify how the keywords are related according to the co-appearances in the doctoral dissertations. If we look at the resulting network, we identify some groupings occurring around languages, health, history and arts, educational planning, and teacher training. In addition, some themes such as software, algebra or ethics are interrelated with some of the previous ones.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>This study presents a balance of the production of doctoral dissertations in education departments of Andalusian universities in the interval between 2010-2021. Among the results, it stands out that from 2018 onwards a significant decrease in the production of doctoral dissertations is evident, this data should lead to future studies that allow us to explain what the reasons are. One possible explanation may be due to the creation of the so-called doctoral schools by many of the universities, so that the departments are no longer the biddings of doctoral programs. Also, in some cases it may happen that, although the Doctoral Dissertations corresponds to educational topics, its director does not belong to a department of education, but the university assigns the thesis to the director's department, as for example happens at the UCO.</p><p>The University of Granada emerges as the leading university institution in the production of doctoral dissertations in education in Andalusia, producing almost half of all those produced in this autonomous community.</p><p>In relation to the gender of the authors, it was observed that the majority of the dissertations on education were written by women. At the individual level, the University of Seville clearly shows the feminization of doctoral research in education, as it outnumbers men by a ratio of two to one in favor of women. If we look at the type of direction, we see that the participation of women is minimal (19%) and there is a bias in favor of the directions of only men (63.7%). In absolute terms, women only represent 21.01%.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>This study was funded by 1381149-R research project of the Andalusian Research Plan and FEDER funds.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Maz-Machado, A., Rodr&#237;guez-Baiget, M.J., Antiduelo-Garc&#237;a, A.M. and Linde, G. (2023) Involvement of Women in the Production of Doctoral Dissertations in Education in Andalusian Universities. Open Access Library Journal, 10: e10381. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110381</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126626-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afia, N., Firdausi, N., Rosyidah, E., Anam, F. and Purnomo, A. (2021) A Study of TESOL in ASEAN Using Scientometric Mapping Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial &amp; Mechanical Engineering and Operations Management, Dhaka, 26-27 December 2021, 777-786.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kappi, M. and Biradar, B.S. (2022) Twenty-Six Years of Research Performance of the Journal of Optics: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Path. Journal of Optics, 52, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-022-00849-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Ouml;zkaya, A. (2018) Bibliometric Analysis of the Studies in the Field of Mathematics Education. Educational Research and Reviews, 13, 723-734.  
https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3603</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thanuskodi, S. (2011) Bibliometric Analysis of the Indian Journal of Chemistry. Library Philosophy and Practice.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gl&amp;auml;nzel, W. and Schoepflin, U. (1999) A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences. Information Processing &amp; Management, 35, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00028-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiménez-Fanjul, N., Maz-Machado, A. and Bracho-López, R. (2013) Bibliometric Analysis of the Mathematics Education Journals in the SSCI. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2, 26-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sivertsen, G. (2016) Patterns of Internationalization and Criteria for Research Assessment in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Scientometrics, 107, 357-368.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1845-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ho, H.C. and Ho, Y.S. (2015) Publications in Dance Field in Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index: A Bibliometric Analysis. Scientometrics, 105, 1031-1040.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1716-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W.M. and Ho, Y.S. (2017) Bibliometric Analysis of Art Exhibit Reviews in the Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index. Malaysian Journal of Library &amp; Information Science, 22, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol22no1.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alikina, E.V., Kavardakova, E.L. and Kushnina, V. (2016) Scientometric Study of Russian Research into Translation/Interpreting Pedagogy. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6, 182-189. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-211545</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, T., Lund, B. and Dow, M. (2022) A Bibliometrics Study of Library and Information Science Doctoral Dissertations in China from 2011 to 2020. Education for Information.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haque, M.E. and Khan, M.M. (2020) Doctoral Dissertations of Agricultural Faculty of BAU: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1974 to 2014. The Eastern Librarian, 25, 58-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Repiso, R., Torres-Salinas, D. and Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2011) Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis Applied to Television Dissertations Presented in Spain (1976/2007) Revista Comunicar, 19, 151-159.  
https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-03-07</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernández-Guerrero, I.M., Callejas, Z., Griol, D. and Fernández-Cano, A. (2020) Longitudinal Patterns in Spanish Doctoral Dissertations on Scientific Medical Information: A Tertiary Study. Scientometrics, 124, 1241-1260.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03494-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Machan, K. and Portero, F.S. (2018) Doctoral Theses in Diagnostic Imaging: A Study of Spanish Production between 1976 and 2011. Radiología (English Edition), 60, 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2018.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duarte-Martínez, V., López-Herrera, A.G. and Cobo, M.J. (2018) Constructing Bibliometric Networks from Spanish Doctoral Dissertations. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning-IDEAL 2018: 19th International Conference, Madrid, 21-23 November 2018, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03496-2_15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., Rico, L., Gutiérrez, P. and Maz, A. (2003) Análisis cienciométrico de las tesis doctorales espa&amp;ntilde;olas en educación y matemática (1976-1998). Revista Espa&amp;ntilde;ola de Documentación Científica, 26, 162-174.  
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2003.v26.i2.135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maz-Machado, A., Rodríguez, M. and de los ángeles Hidalgo-Méndez, M. (2022) Una mirada de género a la gestión de la investigación en Educación matemática en las universidades andaluzas. Matemáticas, Educación y Sociedad, 5, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torralbo, M., Vallejo, M., Fernández-Cano, A. and Rico, L. (2004) Análisis metodológico de la producción espa&amp;ntilde;ola de tesis doctorales en educación matemática (1976-1998). RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 10, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M. and Vallejo, M. (2008) Revisión y prospectiva de la producción espa&amp;ntilde;ola en tesis doctorales de Pedagogía (1976-2006). Revista de Investigación Educativa, 26, 191-207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mu&amp;ntilde;oz-&amp;Ntilde;ungo, B., Rodríguez-Faneca, C., Maz-Machado, A. and Cuida, A. (2021) La presencia de la mujer en las publicaciones de educación en Colombia: Un análisis en el ESCI. Biblios, 82, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2021.959</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernández-Guerrero, I.M., Fernández-Guerrero, C. and Fernández-Cano, A. (2019) Tesis doctorales de Medicina defendidas por mujeres pioneras en Espa&amp;ntilde;a (1882-1954). Educación Médica, 20, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cácerez, M.D. and Díaz, M.J. (2022) El liderazgo de la mujer en la investigación en comunicación. Revista Espa&amp;ntilde;ola de Documentación Científica, 45, e324.  
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2022.2.1859</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maz-Machado, A., Gutiérrez-Rubio, D., Madrid, M.J. and Pedrosa-Jesús, C. (2022) A Look at Doctoral Theses in Mathematics Education at Andalusian Universities (2010-2020) from a Gender Perspective. TEM Journal, 11, 1007-1012.  
https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM113-03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernández García, V., Maz-Machado, A. and Rodríguez, M.J. (2022) Doctoral Dissertations on Foreign Languages in Andalusia (2010-2021): A Gender Analysis. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 38, 114-123.  
https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7785</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126626-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">León-Mantero, C., Casas-Rosal, J.C., Gutiérrez-Rubio, D., Gutiérrez, M.P. and Maz-Machado, A. (2020) La presencia de la mujer en la autoría, defensa y evaluación de tesis doctorales: el caso de la Universidad de Córdoba. In: Gorjón, M.C., Guzmán, R. and Nieto, A.B., Eds., Políticas públicas en defensa de la inclusión, la diversidad y el género, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, 595-608.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>