<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2023.137104</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-126609</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessing Strategies of Obstetric Fistula Management by Nurses/Midwives of Yaound&#233; Central Hospital and University Teaching Hospital
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dobgima</surname><given-names>Walter Pisoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takang</surname><given-names>William Ako</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bassong</surname><given-names>Yves Pierre</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tah</surname><given-names>Nji Joy Mah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Achuo</surname><given-names>Ascensius Mforteh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tameh</surname><given-names>Theodore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boten</surname><given-names>Bouyom Pierre Merlin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Helen</surname><given-names>Kuokuo Kimbi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1210</fpage><lpage>1233</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Every minute, a woman dies in pregnancy, and for every woman who dies 20
   
  -
   
  30 others will survive with morbidity, one of which is obstetrical fistula. Women who suffer from obstetric fistula experience continuous incontinence of urine and/or stool, stigma, social isolation and associated health problems. The World Health Organization estimates that there are currently more than 2 million women living with untreated obstetric fistula mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia, as well as in various other parts of the world. Caring for fistula patients and nursing them back to full physical and mental health can be one of the most challenging and also rewarding tasks undertaken by nurses. The surgery cannot succeed without proper pre-, peri- and post-operative care. The patients undoubtedly recover better with high
  -
  quality care—meaning the truly holistic, generous, and selfless care of a nurse who has the skills, understanding and determination to help these very vulnerable patients. <b>Objective: </b>This research seeks to assess the strategies of obstetric fistula management by nurses/midwives of Yaound&#233; central hospital and CHU by exploring the care they offer to clients pre-operatively, post-operatively, and when they are discharged from the hospital. Achieving Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 3 still remains a challenge to the developing countries although maternal mortality reduction is a priority 
  agenda of each country. <b>Methodology: </b>This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study design employed a sample of 100 nurses/midwives on active service, and who have at least managed a case of obstetric fistula. A quantitative questionnaire was used to collect data, which was analyzed using SPSS version 23. <b>Results: </b>The study proved a highly significant difference between management and qualification, with a p-value of 0.002. Also
  ,
   it showed that there was a statistically significant difference between longevity of service and management with a p-value of 0.001. A majority of respondents were nurse assistants (52%), and up to 43% of respondents had 11
   - 
  20
   
  years of work experience. Up to 53% did not offer standard care with respect to their qualification, and up to 52% did not offer standard care with respect to their longevity in service. <b>Conclusion:</b> VVF is the most common type of obstetric fistula with a frequency of 6 to 10 cases, there is an overall poor management of obstetric fistula by nurses and midwives in YCH and CHU. There is an urgent need to train and retrain these health workers on the management strategies of obstetric fistula and to remind them of their personal commitment as care givers.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Obstetric Fistula</kwd><kwd> Management</kwd><kwd> Midwives</kwd><kwd> Nurses</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Female genital fistula occurs when open defects between the female genital organs and adjacent urinary and colorectal tracts create urinary or fecal incontinence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref1">1</xref>] . These defects, literally holes, allow the urine or stool to leak into the vagina. In developing nations, where pregnant women often give birth with minimal or no obstetric care, fistula most often occurs as a result of several days of prolonged or obstructed labor. This genitourinary or rectovaginal fistula (RVF) occurring after labor and its complications are labeled obstetric fistula.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Background of Studies</title><p>Millions of girls and young women in resource poor countries are living in shame and isolation, often abandoned by their husbands and excluded by their families and communities. They usually live in abject poverty, shunned or blamed by society and, unable to earn money, many fall deeper into poverty and further despair. The reason for this suffering is that these young girls or women are living with an obstetric fistula due to complications which arose during childbirth. Their babies are also probably dead, which adds to their depression, pain and suffering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Obstetric fistula is an abnormal opening between a woman’s vagina and bladder and/or rectum, through which her urine and/or feces continually leak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref3">3</xref>] . Naturally these women are embarrassed by their inability to control their bodily functions, that they are constantly soiled and wet, and that they smell. Their pain and shame may be further complicated by recurring infections, infertility, and damage to their vaginal tissue that makes sexual activity impossible and paralysis of the muscles in their lower legs which may require the use of crutches, if any are available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref2">2</xref>] . The greater tragedy is that these obstetric fistulas can be largely avoided by delaying the age of first pregnancy, prevented by the cessation of harmful traditional practices and timely access to maternity and obstetric care, and repaired by simple surgery.</p><p>Obstetric fistula is an abnormal connection between the vagina, rectum and/or bladder which may develop after prolonged and obstructed labour and lead to continuous urinary or faecal incontinence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref5">5</xref>] . A hole between the urinary bladder and the vagina is regarded as vesicovaginal fistula whereas a hole between the rectum and the vagina is known as rectovaginal fistula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref6">6</xref>] . Obstetric fistula is an indicator of the health system failing to provide accessible, timely and appropriate intrapartum care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref7">7</xref>] . Obstructed labour is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality in developing countries and with it, comes other morbidities, the most devastating being obstetric fistula. It is estimated that for every maternal death, 20 - 30 women develop serious obstetric complications including fistula. These women, apart from surviving the ordeal of obstructed labour, face the physical and psychosocial challenges of living with obstetric fistula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Nurses and midwives play a major role in the care of women who live with obstetric fistula and seek health care. They are responsible for many of the procedures that help prevent infection at all stages of the client’s treatment. Nurses and midwives often perform the initial assessment of women living with obstetric fistula. They also manage clients who present early. For women who decide to undergo repair surgery, nurses and midwives perform preoperative care, assist in the operating theatre, and care for the client after surgery. Catheter management is an important nursing function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>This study was aimed at analyzing strategies of obstetric fistula management by nurses/midwives of Yaound&#233; central hospital and CHU.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Problem Statement</title><p>Obstetric fistula (OF), which develops after a difficult childbirth leading to continuous urinary and fecal incontinence, is the most debilitating and devastating condition among all maternal morbidities. Although it has been completely eradicated from the developed world during the early 1900s, millions of marginalized women in developing countries still suffer from obstetric fistula.</p><p>The World Health Organization (2005) estimated an annual incidence of 50,000 - 100,000 new cases of obstetric fistula worldwide, directly linked tone of the major causes of maternal mortality, obstructed labour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>In Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, it is estimated that more than 2million young women live with untreated Obstetric fistula and these victims suffer constant incontinence, shame, and social segregation and health problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>In Cameroon, according to 2018 Demographic and Health Survey, it is estimated that about 20,000 women suffer from obstetric fistula and are currently living with this condition, and that Cameroon has one of the world’s highest rates of maternal mortality. Affected women remain with anatomical, functional and social defects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>According to the multiple indicator cluster survey conducted in Cameroon in 2020, the prevalence of obstetric fistula is 21,000 cases and about 2000 new ones occur each year. The vast majority of women affected by obstetric fistula are very young and come from poor families. In addition to the lack of resources to pay medical costs, they are victims of stigmatization, violence and other harmful cultural practices which sometimes force them into isolation and even social exclusion. For most of these affected women, obstetric fistula is nothing more or less than a life destroyed, physically, economically, socially and emotionally.</p><p>This immense number is very concerning and has generated lots of worry within the researcher especially as the actual prevalence figures may be much higher since many of the affected women live in isolation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>In addition, being opportune to partake in a fistula campaign in 2019, the researcher noticed that 80% of victims had undergone surgery at least once without success. At this point, the researcher wonders if it could it be at the level of nursing management where more attention needs to be paid and for this reason, the researcher proposed to undertake a study to assess the strategies of managing obstetric fistula by nurses/midwives of Yaound&#233; central hospital and CHU [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. Research Questions</title><p>From the above problem statement, the researcher was guided by the following general and specific research questions:</p><sec id="s1_3_1"><title>1.3.1. General Research Question</title><p>What are the strategies can be used to manage obstetric fistula by nurses and midwives?</p></sec><sec id="s1_3_2"><title>1.3.2. Specific Research Questions</title><p>What is the prevalence of obstetric fistula in Yaound&#233;?</p><p>v What are the different types of obstetric fistula commonly identified?</p><p>v What management strategies are offered by nurses/midwives to patients suffering from obstetric fistula in Yaound&#233; central hospital and CHU?</p><p>v What are the successes and challenges identified in the management obstetric fistula?</p></sec></sec><sec id="s1_4"><title>1.4. Hypothesis</title><p>The management strategy of obstetric fistula and its outcome will be determined by the qualification of health personnel, coupled to the number of years of experience.</p><p>- Null hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between qualification, longevity of service of nurse/midwife and strategies used in management of obstetric fistula in the Yaound&#233; central hospital and university teaching hospital.</p><p>- Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant relationship between qualification, longevity of service of nurse/midwife and strategies used in management of obstetric fistula in the Yaound&#233; central hospital and university teaching hospital.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design/Methodology</title><p>A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study design was used to gain insight into the management of obstetric fistula by Nurses/Midwives of the Yaound&#233; central hospital and university teaching hospital during the research period at this site. The study which is cross-sectional in nature was conducted among Nurses/Midwives irrespective of their gender, ages, and are on active service in these respective hospitals. Quantitative questionnaires were developed from literature, theories and management policies to assess the care offered to patients suffering from obstetric fistula, by nurses and midwives, in terms of pre-operative, post-operative and discharge care. The researcher employed a quantitative data collection method using the survey approach to collect data. The survey questionnaires were created on the basis of previously validated scales and survey instruments. The primary intent of this statistical approach was to allow extrapolation of the results obtained to the population from which the sample is obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Site</title><p>This study was carried out at Yaound&#233; Central Hospital and the university teaching hospital. These are two of the main teaching hospitals in the center region of Cameroon, which provide fistula care programs when need be.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Population</title><p>The study population consisted of nurses and midwives in active service at the Yaound&#233; central hospital (YCH) and CHU, who must have managed at least a case of obstetric fistula. A sample of 100 Nurses/midwives was selected and issued questionnaires.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Inclusion Criteria</title><p>Participants were enrolled in the study after meeting the following screening criteria:</p><p>- Nurses/midwives on active service in either Yaound&#233; central hospital or the university teaching hospital.</p><p>- Participants should have managed at least a case of obstetric fistula.</p><p>- Participants should be willing to provide information needed.</p><p>- Participants should be willing to fill a consent form.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Exclusion Criteria</title><p>Some nurses/midwives were excluded from the study if any of the following apply:</p><p>- If participants were not willing to provide necessary information.</p><p>- If they were not willing to sign the consent form.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Sample Size and Sampling Technique</title><p>According to NKOUM, 2019 a researcher should always work on a representative sample of his/her original population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref15">15</xref>] . A sample size of 100 Nurses/ Midwives on active duty was selected from hospital records and contacted for delivery of questionnaires.</p><p>The Cochrane’s formula was used to determine the sample size for the study, whereby,</p><p>n o = ( Z 2 p q ) / e 2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref1">1</xref>]</p><p>where,</p><p>no is the sample size;</p><p>e is the desired level of precision (i.e. the margin of error, for 95% confidence interval = 0.05);</p><p>p is the estimated proportion of the population which has the attribute in question;</p><p>q is 1 − p;</p><p>Z is corresponding value on Z-table for desired confidence interval (95% = 1.96).</p><p>Assumption = proportion p of nurses and midwives among other health personnel is 1:15 (1/15 = 0.066). Therefore,</p><p>q = 1 − p = 1 − 0.066 = 0.934</p><p>n o = ( 1.96 2 &#215; 0.066 &#215; 0.934 ) / 0.05 2 = 0.2368115904 / 0.0025 = 94.724</p><p>which is approximately 95.</p><p>Hence, a sample size of 100 was collected.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Data Collection</title><p>Instrument for Data collection</p><p>The process of data collection involves collecting opinions and useful information from target participant about the research questions or topic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Data collection was carried out by the principal researcher through a questionnaire. The tool was designed with questions that sought to collect information on; demographic data, the pre-operative, post-operative and discharged care offered to patients towards the management of obstetric fistula. These questionnaires were drafted both in English and French which are the main languages used in these two hospitals.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Data Analysis Process</title><p>The questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS version 23 for descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p>The data were coded before being entered into SPSS. There after it was screened for missing data or outlier. The few Missing data less than 2% were substitute with the mean value.</p><p>The descriptive central tendencies were expressed by mode or mean based on the level of measurement. They were expressed using frequencies, percentages and bar charts. MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance) was carried out to investigate any significant group differences on demographic or professional factors such as sex, experience, professional titles, and the hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Ethical Consideration</title><p>Authorisation was obtained from the Faculty of Health Science; an authorisation to conduct the study was also obtained from the Directors of the Yaound&#233; Central Hospital and the university teaching hospital, with an informed consent gotten from each participant. Each participant was assured of privacy and confidentiality of information.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Interpretation</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Socio-Demographic Data and Health Facility</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that the majority of respondents (56%) were from Yaound&#233; central hospital</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, it can be observed that majority of the respondents were between the ages of 40 - 49 years (i.e. 59%); a greater number of them were of female gender (i.e. 82%).</p><p>Also, we realized that most of the respondents were Nurse assistants (i.e. 52%), and up to 43% of them had a longevity of service ranging between 11 - 20 years.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Prevalence of Fistula</title><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, we discovered that the most common type of obstetric fistula is the vesico-vagina fistula (i.e. 100%), and up to 87% of the respondents indicated that it occurred at least 6 times in every 10 cases of obstetric fistula. Up to 62% of the respondents revealed that they use 0.5% chlorine solution to effectively decontaminate instruments and other healthcare items for 10 minutes before use, 34% use it at times while 4% don’t use it at all.</p><p>Majority of the respondents i.e., 54% confirmed that they use sterile gloves when inserting a urinary catheter, and 41% of respondents said at times they use sterile gloves.</p><p>Up to 48% accepted they clean the periurethral mucosa from anterior to posterior, inner to outer, and one swipe per swab, 38% of the study population said they do that at times, while 6% said they don’t do it at all.</p><p>Majority of the respondents proved that they do not encourage clients to drink at least 5 L of water per day before surgery, 56% said Yes they do and 44% of respondents do that at times.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, up to 73% of respondents testify that they do not encourage patients to do regular exercises before surgery, only 27% do and 0% do that at times.</p><p>Up to 66% of study population testify that they shave clients’ perineum to prepare them for surgery, 32% do that at times while 2% do not have clients at all.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of participants according to health Institution</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health institutions of participants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yaound&#233; central hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >University teaching hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of participants with regards to Sociodemographic profile</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 to 39 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 to 49 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN (State Registered Nurse)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Years of work experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of participants’ responses with regards to fistula prevalence</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Most common type of fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vesico-vaginal fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Estimate the frequency of most common fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 in every 10 cases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 in every 10 cases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 in every 10 cases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A majority of respondents 66% check patient’s urinary bags hourly before surgery, though 32% do check at times and 2% don’t check at all as seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of participants’ responses regarding fistula management strategies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-Operative Care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Use of 0.5% Chlorine for decontamination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIME</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cleaning of mucosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Use of sterile gloves in inserting urinary catheter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client to drink at least 5 L water daily</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client to do exercise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shave client’s perineum before surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Check urinary bag hourly before surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Following <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, 61% of respondents check for bleeding 28 hours after surgery, 11% at times check for bleeding, while up to 28% don’t check.</p><p>A majority of respondents 49% revealed that they encourage client to drink at least 5 L of water per day, 24 hours after surgery, 23% do encourage patients at times and 28% do not encourage the patients.</p><p>61% of respondents confirmed that they remove vaginal pack (if used) 24 hours after surgery, unless advised otherwise by physician, 14% said “At times”, while 25% said “No” to the statement.</p><p>Majority of the respondents 83% accepted that they always ensure that client is dry, and all drainages are draining, 13% said they do that at times and 4% said they don’t do it at all.</p><p>Up to 85% of respondents affirmed that they teach and encourage the client to do a Sitz bath at least twice a day, 9% of them do it not all the time, and 6% don’t do it at all.</p><p>38% of study population accepted that they clean drainage bags daily with 0.5% chlorine solution, 27% do not clean and 25% clean drainage bags at times.</p><p>A greater proportion of the study population accepted that they administer medication following prescription order, 4% said “At times”.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, a majority of the respondents 82%, proved that they usually stress on the importance of sexual abstinence during the healing period (usually six months), 17% do that atimes , and 1% don’t.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, 54% of respondents take time to describe the signs of complications and side effects that may follow fistula repair surgery to patients, 39% do that atimes and 7% don’t take time to do that.</p><p>49% of study population revealed that they stress on the importance of delaying pregnancy for at least one year after repair surgery, 40% said “Atimes” and 11% said “No”.</p><p>61% of respondents agreed that they discuss the importance of family planning once the client resumes sexual relations, and 33% said “Atimes”</p><p>83% of respondents acknowledged the fact that they caution the client about reproductive tract infections, including sexually transmitted infections, 13% of them do that at times while the remaining 4% don’t do it at all.</p><p>A majority of the respondents 85% advise the client about healthy nutrition, 9% give advice at times and 6% don’t at all.</p><p>38% of respondents take time to remind the client that she must receive antenatal care if she becomes pregnant again, 37% do that at times and the remaining 25% don’t remind at all.</p><p>Up to 87% of the respondents confirmed that they encourage patient to respect her RDV 3 months after discharge as instructed by physician, 9% said “At times” and 4% of the respondents said “No”.</p><p>A few of respondents 9% contact their clients regularly to know how they are doing, 37% of them are irregular while 54% of them don’t contact their patients at all.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, there’s a highly significant difference between the health facilities (university teaching hospital and Yaound&#233; central hospital) in pre-operative management of obstetric fistula. The p-value equals 0.000 and is much smaller than 0.05, thus supporting the accuracy of the Chi-square test for these data.</p><p>Following the relationship between health facilities and post-op care, the test is not significant with a p-value of 0.281 which is a lot higher than 0.05, showing that there is no relationship between the health facilities (CHU and YCH) and post-op care offered to patients suffering from obstetric fistula. They produce approximately similar p-values thus supporting the accuracy of the Chi-square test for these data.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of participants’ responses regarding obstetric fistula management strategies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-operative care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monitoring of vital signs every 15 mins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIME</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Check bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client to drink atleast 5 L water daily</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Remove vaginal pack after 24 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ensure client is dry and all drainages are draining</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teach and ensure client does sitz bath</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clean drainage bags daily with 0.5% Chlorine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Administer medication as prescribed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to health facilities</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >On discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client on sexual abstinence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client on signs of complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client to delay pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client on family planning</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ensure client is dry and all drainages are draining</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client on STIs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health education to client on healthy nutrition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Invite partner when counselling client</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Communicate with client regularly after discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >At TIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The Chi square of Pearson tests between pre-op and qualification (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>(b)), gives the following values:</p><table-wrap-group id="7"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Cross tabulation between qualification and pre-op care; (b) Chi-Square Tests result of pre-op care and qualification; (c) Cross tabulation between qualification of respondents and post-op care; (d) Chi-Square Tests result of qualification of respondents and post-op care; (e) Cross tabulation between qualification and post-discharge follow-up; (f) Frequency of pre-operative care with respect to qualification</title></caption><table-wrap id="7_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Qualification of respondents</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pre-op care</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >At times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_2"><caption><title> (c)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square TESTS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Calculated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.086<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Read from Chi-Square Table</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_3"><caption><title> (d)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Qualification of respondents</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Post-op care</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >At times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_4"><caption><title> (e)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square Tests</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Calculated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.471<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Read from Chi-Square Table</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_5"><caption><title> (f)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Qualification of respondents</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Post-discharge follow-up</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >At times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_6"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PRE-OP CARE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POST-OP CARE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 3-years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POST-DISCHARGE CARE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATIMES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Degree of freedom (3 − 1) &#215; (3 − 1) = 4;</p><p>Calculated Chi Square value = 23.086;</p><p>Read Chi Square value = 9.49.</p><p>➢ Read Chi Square value is less than calculated Chi Square value (9.49 &lt; 23.086).</p><p>X<sup>2</sup><sub>(read)</sub> &lt; X<sup>2</sup><sub>(calculated)</sub>. Conclusion; H<sub>0</sub> is rejected, hence H<sub>1</sub> verified (the two crossed variables are related).</p><p>P value = 0.000 (Significant relationship).</p><p>The Chi square of Pearson tests between qualification of respondents and post-op care (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>(d)), gives the following values:</p><p>Degree of freedom (3 − 1) &#215; (3 − 1) = 4;</p><p>Calculated Chi Square value = 17.471;</p><p>Read Chi Square value = 9.49.</p><p>➢ Read Chi Square value is less than calculated Chi Square value (9.49 &lt; 17.471).</p><p>X<sup>2</sup><sub>(read)</sub> &lt; X<sup>2</sup><sub>(calculated)</sub>. Conclusion; H<sub>0</sub> is rejected, hence H<sub>1</sub> verified (the two crossed variables are related).</p><p>P value = 0.002 (Significant relationship).</p><p>The Chi square of Pearson tests between longevity of service and pre-op care (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>(b)), gives the following values:</p><p>Degree of freedom (3 − 1) &#215; (3 − 1) = 4;</p><p>Calculated Chi Square value = 14.208;</p><p>Read Chi Square value = 9.49.</p><p>➢ Read Chi Square value is less than calculated Chi Square value (9.49 &lt; 14.208).</p><table-wrap-group id="8"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Cross tabulation between longevity of service and pre-op care offered; (b) Chi-Square Tests result of Years of work experience and pre-op care; (c) Cross tabulation between longevity of service and post-op care; (d) Chi-Square Tests result of post-discharge follow up and longevity of service</title></caption><table-wrap id="8_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Longevity of service</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pre-op care</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >At times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="8_2"><caption><title> (c)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square Tests</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Calculated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.208<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Read from Chi-Square Table</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="8_3"><caption><title> (d)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Longevity of service</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Post-op care</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >At times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="8_4"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square Tests</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Calculated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.885<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Read from Chi-Square Table</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>X<sup>2</sup><sub>(read)</sub> &lt; X<sup>2</sup><sub>(calculated)</sub>. Conclusion; H<sub>0</sub> is rejected, hence H<sub>1</sub> verified (the two crossed variables are related).</p><p>P value = 0.007 (Significant relationship).</p><p>A Significant relationship exists between longevity of service and pre-op care offered to patients.</p><p>The Chi square of Pearson tests between Method of post-discharge follow up and longevity of service (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>(d)), gives the following values:</p><p>Degree of freedom (3 − 1) &#215; (3 − 1) = 4;</p><p>Calculated Chi Square value = 21.885;</p><p>Read Chi Square value = 9.49.</p><p>➢ Read Chi Square value is less than calculated Chi Square value (9.49 &lt; 21.885).</p><p>X<sup>2</sup><sub>(read)</sub> &lt; X<sup>2</sup><sub>(calculated)</sub>. Conclusion; H<sub>0</sub> is rejected, hence H<sub>1</sub> verified (the two crossed variables are related).</p><p>P value = 0.000 (Significant relationship).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Successes in Obstetric Fistula Management</title><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> below, we observe that only 29% of respondents confirmed that woman recovers with no complication after 6 months, up to 50% confirming no specific format of documentation and 23% not respecting available protocol.</p><p>Following <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 below, the test is highly statistically significant with a p-value of 0.000 which is a lot smaller than 0.05. The conclusion is that there is a relationship in the qualification of health personnel (SRN, Midwives, Assistant Nurses) and general outcome in fistula management.</p><p>The Chi square of Pearson tests between General outcome of fistula management and qualification gives the following values:</p><p>Degree of freedom (3 − 1) &#215; (4 − 1) = 6;</p><p>Calculated Chi Square value = 41.264;</p><p>Read Chi Square value = 12.59.</p><p>➢ Read Chi Square value is less than calculated Chi Square value (12.59 &lt; 41.264).</p><p>X<sup>2</sup><sub>(read)</sub> &lt; X<sup>2</sup><sub>(calculated)</sub>. Conclusion; H<sub>0</sub> is rejected, hence H<sub>1</sub> verified (the two crossed variables are related).</p><p>P value = 0.000 (Significant relationship).</p><p>The test below is highly statistically significant with a p-value of 0.000 which is a lot smaller than 0.05. the conclusion is that there is a relationship in the longevity of service of the health personnel (0 - 10 years, 11 - 20 years, 21 - 30 years) and general outcome in the management of fistula (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1(b)).</p><p>The Chi square of Pearson tests between General outcome of fistula management and longevity of service, gives the following values:</p><p>Degree of freedom (3 − 1) &#215; (4 − 1) = 6;</p><p>Calculated Chi Square value = 44.725;</p><p>Read Chi Square value = 12.59.</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of participants’ responses regarding their effectiveness in obstetric fistula management</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetric Fistula management successes (effectiveness)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effective in skills and equipment use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effective in skills not equipment use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fair in skills and equipment use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor in skills and equipment use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Can’t tell Outcome of Obstetric fistula Management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman recovers with no complication after 6months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman recovers with incontinence at discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman ends up with fistula not closed at the end of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman ends up with infections that may lead to secondary infertility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Documentation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No specific format of documentation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >All types are documented as fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Document the specific type with precise information</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No idea if it is documented</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Availability of protocol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes, but not respected at all</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes, respected some times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes, always respected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No idea if there is a protocol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None exist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="10"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> (a) Distribution of responses according to outcome versus qualification; (b) Chi-Square Tests result of General outcome of fistula management and qualification</title></caption><table-wrap id="10_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman recovers with continence after 6 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman recovers with incontinence on discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman ends up with fistula not closed at the end of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman ends up with infection that may lead to secondary infertility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SRN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="10_2"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square Tests</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Calculated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.264<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Read from Chi-Square Table</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>➢ Read Chi Square value is less than calculated Chi Square value (12.59 &lt; 44.725).</p><p>X<sup>2</sup><sub>(read)</sub> &lt; X<sup>2</sup><sub>(calculated)</sub>. Conclusion; H<sub>0</sub> is rejected, hence H<sub>1</sub> verified (the two crossed variables are related).</p><p>P value = 0.000 (Significant relationship).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Challenges</title><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2 below, we observe that only 2% of the respondents confirmed the lack of skills/knowledge in fistula management as a challenge, whereas up to 32% validated limited equipment as the main challenge.</p><p>A majority of respondents, i.e. 33% proposed that an increase in the number of staff will help improve the management of obstetric fistula.</p><table-wrap-group id="11"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> (a) Distribution of responses according to outcome versus longevity of service; (b) Chi-Square Tests result of General outcome of fistula management and longevity of service</title></caption><table-wrap id="11_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman recovers with continence after 6 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 11 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman recovers with incontinence on discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman ends up with fistula not closed at the end of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman ends up with infection that may lead to secondary infertility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 10 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="11_2"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square Tests</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Calculated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.725<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Chi-Square Read from Chi-Square Table</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions, Conclusions and Recommendations</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Discussions</title><sec id="s4_1_1"><title>4.1.1. Socio-Demographic Data</title><p>In this study which was meant to assess the management strategies of obstetric fistula by nurses and midwives of Yaound&#233; central hospital and the university hospital, it was found that amongst the 100 respondents, 6 were less than 30 years old, 25 were within 30 - 39 years old, 59 were within 40 - 49 years old and 10 were within 50 - 59 years old [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>A majority of the respondents i.e. 52 out of 100 were nurse assistants, 23 of them were state registered nurses while 25 of them were midwives.</p><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Distribution of participants’ responses regarding their challenges in Obstetric Fistula management</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General Service Challenge in obstetric fistula management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patient cannot afford for treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited equipment/instrument</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited health Personnel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unavailability of Standard protocol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lack of skills/Knowledge in fistula management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proposed solution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organize more seminars on fistula management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Provide equipment and instruments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increase number of staff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Subsidize treatment cost for fistula management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Provide protocol guidelines</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>With respect to longevity of service, most of the respondents 43 out of 100 had worked within a period of 11 - 20 years, 31 of them had worked for less than 10 years and 26 of them had worked within a period of 21 - 30 years.</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_2"><title>4.1.2. Prevalence of Fistula</title><p>In this study as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the most common type of obstetric fistula is the vesico-vagina fistula at a frequency of 6 in every 10 cases and is in line with Almanda’s findings in 2014 who reported that 79.4% of obstetric fistula were vesico-vaginal the rest were both rectovaginal and combined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_3"><title>4.1.3. Management of Obstetric Fistula</title><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, we observe that pre- and post-operative care offered to patients is similar in both Yaound&#233; central and university teaching hospitals. This can explain the fact that health workers in Cameroon have common training backgrounds depending on the domain, and are indiscriminately sent to different hospitals to exercise their respective functions.</p><p>Following <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, we observe that:</p><p>31% of SRN, 5% of midwives, and 4% of NA offer pre-operative care as standards require;</p><p>24% of SRN, 8% of midwives, and 7% of NA offer post-operative care as standards require;</p><p>42% of SRN, 8% of midwives, and 9% of NA offer post-discharge follow-up as standards require.</p><p>The better management skills observed between nurses and midwives might reflect robust in-service trainings in obstetric fistula nursing care as well as practical exposure before and after graduation from school. This can also be explained by the 3 - 5 years of intensive and detailed training depending on the degree obtained, as compared to a 1 - 2 years as with the case of a nurse assistant.</p><p>Also in Cameroon, it is given that any state registered nurse or midwife would have had a mandatory formal training on management of obstetric fistula as included in curriculum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Nevertheless, the nurse assistants have contributed significantly to the provision of quality care to patients suffering from obstetric fistula and thus a reduction of maternal morbidities in Cameroon as a whole.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>, 9% of health workers with 0 - 10 years of work experience, 21% of health workers with 11 - 20 years of work experience, and 13% of health workers with 21 - 30 years of work experience offer pre-operative care as standards require.</p><p>1% of health workers with 0 - 10 years of work experience, 14% of health workers with 11 - 20 years of work experience, and 6% of health workers with 21 -30 years of work experience offer post-operative care as standards require.</p><p>27% of health workers with 0 - 10 years of work experience, 22% of health workers with 11 - 20 years of work experience, and 10% of health workers with 21 - 30 years of work experience offer post-discharge follow-up as standards require.</p><p>Surprisingly longevity of service (i.e. years of practice) did not influence the quality of health care service towards patients suffering from obstetric fistula, that is even more experienced nurses and midwives do not properly manage due to very high nurse patient ratio in hospitals and thus overworking the personnel.</p><p>In the same line, though there is paucity of data on the current human resource for health in Cameroon today, according to Health sector strategy 2016-2027, and drawing from General Census of health Workforce (RGPS) in 2011, the total number of nurses was 18,954 thus giving a ratio of 1 nurse: 3157 inhabitants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref8">8</xref>] . The few nurses/midwives are prone to high work load and so become overwhelmed with work and so errors can easily set in.</p><p>To add, poor resource management is the order of the day in most hospital settings thus leading to demotivation and a feeling of exploitation, according to Athar Institute of health and management, march 2021 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Similar to management we also observe that, outcome of patients suffering from obstetric fistula is not very different in both Yaound&#233; central and university teaching hospitals. This can also be explained by the fact that health workers in Cameroon have common training backgrounds depending on the domain, and are indiscriminately sent to different hospitals to exercise their respective functions.</p><p>In our study, we observed following <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0, which up to 32% of SRN, 11% of midwives and only 4% nurse assistants confirmed that woman recovers with continence after 6 months. This shows that the more educated the nurses and midwives are, the better the management offered to patients and subsequently a better outcome. This is supported by Aiken and colleagues (2017) who proved that higher qualified staff positively affects the quality of care offered to patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126609-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Contrary to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>, where we observed that longevity of service did not influence the quality of health care service towards patients suffering from obstetric fistula, our findings according to table showed that longevity had a positive impact on the outcome of obstetric fistula management. That is, a greater proportion (14%) of the more experienced group of nurses and midwives (21 - 30 years) accepted that woman recovers with continence after 6 months.</p><p>In as much as there is demotivation in health human resource, some health workers because of the love for their job, could have developed coping behaviors which have helped to sustain their motivation and the consequent quality of healthcare service they provide to patients.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Conclusions</title><p>After discussing, the following conclusions were arrived at:</p><p>A majority of the nurses and midwives in charge of patients suffering from obstetric fistula in the Yaound&#233; central hospital and university teaching hospital have poor management strategies. The study also shows that there is a relationship between qualification of nurse/midwife, longevity of service and the quality of care offered to patients. There is therefore need for training and retraining of health workers to help update their management skills, likewise recruiting more workers to reduce work load thus permitting a better management.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Recommendations</title><p>At the level of the health worker</p><p>- Nurses and midwives should have a stronger will, personal commitment and self-discipline in the follow up of patients suffering from obstetric fistula.</p><p>At the level of the health institution</p><p>- An experienced-based management protocol should be established to help in better follow-up of patients suffering from obstetric fistula.</p><p>- Regular in-service training sessions on the management of obstetric fistula will help update the management skills of nurses and midwives and subsequently lead to better management.</p><p>At the level of the ministry</p><p>- More seminars on fistula management should be organised with provision of more fistula centres in Cameroon, which will help relieve the disease burden carried by women living with obstetric fistula in Cameroon and in Africa as a whole.</p><p>- Provide standard equipment and instruments used in the follow-up of patients suffering from obstetric fistula.</p><p>- National recruitment of more health staff to reduce work load.</p><p>- Subsidise treatment for obstetric fistula patients.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Proposal for Further Studies</title><p>The same study should be carried out in other hospitals in Cameroon.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pisoh, D.W., Ako, T.W., Pierre, B.Y., Mah, T.N.J., Mforteh, A.A., Theodore, T., Merlin, B.B.P. and Kimbi, H.K. (2023) Assessing Strategies of Obstetric Fistula Management by Nurses/Midwives of Yaound&#233; Central Hospital and University Teaching Hospital. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13, 1210-1233. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2023.137104</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126609-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, G. and de Bernis, L. (2006) Obstetric Fistula. Guiding Principles for Clinical Management and Programme Development. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kelly, J. (2004) Outreach Programmes for Obstetric Fistulae. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 24, 117-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610410001645352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campbell, I.M. and Ian, S.A. (2021) Nursing Care for Women with Childbirth Injuries.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2009) Obstetric Fistula: Guiding Principles for Clinical Management and Programme Development. WHO, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hilton, P. and Ward, A. (1998) Epidemiological and Surgical Aspects of Urogenital Fistulae: A Review of 25 Years’ Experience in Southeast Nigeria. International Urogynecology Journal, 9, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minding the Gap: Ending Fistula. http://cameroon.unfpa.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nigeria Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) (2013) NDHS Final Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ijaiya, M.A. and Aboyeji, P.A. (2004) Obstetric Urogenital Fistula: The Ilorin Experience, Nigeria. West African Journal of Medicine, 23, 7-9.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v23i1.28071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banke-Thomas, A.O., Kouraogo, S.F., Siribie, A., et al. (2013) Knowledge of Obstetric Fistula Prevention amongst Young Women in Urban and Rural Burkina Faso: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 8, e85921.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085921</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mselle, L.T., Kohi, T.W., Mvungi, A., et al. (2011) Waiting for Attention and Care: Birthing Accounts of Women in Rural Tanzania Who Developed Obstetric Fistula as an Outcome of Labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 11, Article No. 75.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-75</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mselle, L.T. and Kohi, T.W. (2015) Perceived Health System Causes of Obstetric Fistula from Accounts of Affected Women in Rural Tanzania: A Qualitative Study. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 19, 124-132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, A. and Masakhwe, B.A. (2010) WHO Midwifery Education Module 3: Managing Prolonged and Obstructed Labour. Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fistula Care (2013) Urinary Catheterization for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Obstetric Fistula: Report of a Consultative Meeting to Review and Standardize Current Guidelines and Practices, March 13-15 at the Sheraton Hotel, Abuja, Nigeria. Engender Health/Fistula Care, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waaldijk, K. (2004) The Immediate Management of Fresh Obstetric Fistulas. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 191, 795-799.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waaldijk, K. (1994) The Immediate Surgical Management of Fresh Obstetric Fistulas with Catheter and/or Early Closure. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 45, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(94)90759-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, S., Modi, P., Mishra, A., et al. (2021) Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Injuries to Bladder and Ureter Following Gynecological Surgery and Obstetric Injury: A Single-Center Experience. Urology Annals, 13, 405-411.  
https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_69_20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126609-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goh, J.W.T. and Krause, H.G. (2004) Female Genital Tract Fistula. University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>