<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Computational Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2332-5968</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cc.2023.113005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC-126569</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Design of New Thiadiazole Derivatives with Improved Antidiabetic Activity
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chiépi</surname><given-names>Nadège Dominique Dou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Georges</surname><given-names>Stéphane Dembele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamadou</surname><given-names>Guy-Richard Kone</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nanou</surname><given-names>Tiéba Tuo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fandia</surname><given-names>Konate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Niare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Panaghiotis</surname><given-names>Karamanis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nahossé</surname><given-names>Ziao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Physique Fondamentale et Appliquée, UFR SFA, Université NANGUI ABROGOUA, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te-d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Groupe Ivoirien de Recherches en Modélisation des Maladies (GIR2M), Université NANGUI ABROGOUA, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te-d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Thermodynamique et de Physico-Chimie du Milieu, Université NANGUI ABROGOUA, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te-d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>E2S UPPA, CNRS, IPREM, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Pau, France</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Diabetes is a serious, long-term (or chronic) disease that occurs when a person’s blood sugar levels are high because their body cannot produce enough insulin, or does not produce enough insulin or that it cannot effectively use the insulin it produces. According to the literature, this disease has several causes, but certain types of diabetes such as type 2 diabetes are most closely linked to a metabolic disorder due to abdominal obesity. Thus, the number of individuals with type 2 diabetes is increasing. It is with this in mind that we work to improve human health. The aim of this study is to design new derivatives of 1,3,4-thiadiazole with improved antidiabetic activity by the mathematical model of multiple linear regression (MLR) established previously. The analysis of the effect on the substituents influencing the antidiabetic activity, fourteen (14) new molecules coded CDTH were generated and presenting values of the potential of inhibitory concentration higher than that of the base compound (pIC50 = 2.526). But thirteen (13) of these new compounds belong to the domain of applicability of the MLR model established previously. In addition, the thermodynamic quantities of formation formed at 298K have been calculated. Lipinski’s rule and pharmacokinetic properties proved that five (5) (TH4, TH9, TH10, TH13 and TH14) new molecules can be used as diabetes medicine.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Design</kwd><kwd> Antidiabetic Activity</kwd><kwd> 1</kwd><kwd>3</kwd><kwd>4-Thiadiazole</kwd><kwd> Lipinski’s Rule</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Diabetes is one of the oldest diseases known to mankind whose devastating effect is increasing day by day and seriously to an epidemic level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref1">1</xref>] . It is a disease of disordered carbohydrate metabolism, which also affects proteins and fats which are caused by the total or relative insufficiency of the action of insulin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref2">2</xref>] . Today, more than 420 million people have diabetes worldwide. This number is estimated to increase to 570 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref3">3</xref>] . The hyperglycemia seen in diabetes mellitus is the result of a mismatch between the amount of insulin needed to regulate metabolic processes and the amount of insulin secreted by β cells. Insulin treatment is the mainstay of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, while dietary and lifestyle modifications are the mainstay of the treatment and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in his beginnings. Insulin is also important in type 2 diabetes mellitus when blood sugar levels cannot be controlled by diet, weight loss, exercise, and oral medications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref4">4</xref>] . Most diabetic patients have type 2 diabetes. Simple lifestyle changes can prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes and its complications. In addition to these preventions, there are Oral Antidiabetics (OAD) that affected patients use. Despite these preventions and treatments, there is resistance to this disease. It is therefore urgent to find new molecules with new mechanisms of action to meet these needs. Thus, in their work Pattan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref5">5</xref>] also showed that 1,3,4-thiadiazoles exhibit antidiabetic activity. In addition, 1,3,4-thiadiazole and derivatives possess a wide range of therapeutic activities like antimicrobial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref6">6</xref>] , antifungal, diuretic, antiulcer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref7">7</xref>] , antimycobacterial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref8">8</xref>] , antioxidant/radioprotective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref9">9</xref>] , anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, antidepressant, anticancer, anti-leshmanic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref11">11</xref>] . To do so, the scientific community is moving towards new research methods that consist in predicting the activities of molecules even before they are synthesized. These modeling methods have been recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the design of new molecules with therapeutic properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref12">12</xref>] . This approach is increasingly used to reduce the excessive number of experiments, which are sometimes long, dangerous and costly in terms of time and finance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref14">14</xref>] . As part of our work, the mathematical model of multiple linear regression (MLR) and the domain of applicability (DA) previously established [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref15">15</xref>] by the Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship were used. The general objective of this work is to use the mathematical model established by Dou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref15">15</xref>] to design new antidiabetic derivatives of 1,3,4-thiadiazole within the scope of applicability.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Computer Aided Design</title><p>The new approach, known as Fragment-Based Drug Design (FBDD), or FBDD, appeared in the late 1990s in pharmaceutical research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref18">18</xref>] . This approach involves the screening of organic molecules of very low molecular mass, the fragment molecules. The latter are distinguished from molecules traditionally present in the chemical libraries of pharmaceutical companies and academic laboratories by their low molecular complexity and their moderate size. Fragment molecules can in fact be considered as fractions of molecules commonly called “lead-like” and “drug-like”, used for high-throughput screening campaigns.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Basic Structure</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> below is the molecular structure of 1,3,4-thiadiazole (TH) which was used for modeling.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Molecular Model</title><p>The equation and the statistical parameters of the model established by Dou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref15">15</xref>] are presented below:</p><p>pIC 50 = − 11.36472 + 0.18089 ∗ α ( S-C-N ) − 5.70651 ∗ l ( C=N ) + 0.02973 ∗ μ ( D ) − 0.40993 * Δ S f 0 (1)</p><p>This equation will be used to predict the antidiabetic activity of new 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Structures Selected</title><p>The effects of substituents on the antidiabetic activity of the molecules were studied in order to detect the substituents which influence the pIC<sub>50</sub>. The approach adopted is as follows:</p><p>• Classification of 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives in decreasing order of pIC<sub>50</sub>;</p><p>• Identification of substituents of molecules with the highest pIC<sub>50</sub> values.</p><p>Thus, by ranking all the 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives in decreasing order of the potential for inhibiting antidiabetic activity (pIC<sub>50</sub>), the first five (5) were selected. Those compounds with the best values of antidiabetic activity will serve as the basic structure for the design. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> includes the 2D structures of these molecules and the pIC<sub>50</sub> values.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Thermodynamic Quantities of Formation</title><p>The calculation of the thermodynamic quantities of the molecules was carried out from optimization and calculation of the frequencies at the level of theory DFT/B3LYP/6-31+G (d, p) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref21">21</xref>] . The quantities such as the variation of entropy, the variation of enthalpy and the variation of the free enthalpy of formation of the new derivatives of antimalarial activity were determined by means of the following formulas proposed by Otchersky et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>Δ H f 0 ( M , 0 K ) = ∑ a t o m s x Δ H f 0 ( X , 0 K ) − ∑ ​ D 0 (2)</p><p>Δ H f 0 ( M , 298 K ) = Δ H f 0 ( M , 0 K ) + ( H M 0 ( 298 K ) − H M 0 ( 0 K ) ) − ∑ a t o m s x ( H X 0 ( 298 K ) − H X 0 ( 0 K ) ) (3)</p><p>Avec:</p><p>∑ ​ D 0 = ∑ ​ x ε 0 − ε 0 ( M ) − ε Z P E (4)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> 2D structure of the five selected 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Common structure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pIC<sub>50</sub> exp</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.526</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.524</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.387</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.320</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.376</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>∑ ​ D 0 : Atomization energy;</p><p>ε 0 ( M ) : Total energy of the molecule;</p><p>ε Z P E : Energy of the zero point of the molecule;</p><p>H X 0 ( 298 K ) − H X 0 ( 0 K ) : Enthalpy corrections of atomic elements. These values are included in Janaf’s table [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref23">23</xref>] ;</p><p>H M 0 ( 298 K ) − H M 0 ( 0 K ) = H c o r r − ε Z P E ( M ) : Molecule enthalpy correction;</p><p>H c o r r : Thermal correction enthalpy.</p><p>Δ S f 0 ( M , 298 K ) = S M − ∑ a t o m s x Δ S ( 298 K ) (5)</p><p>x : Number of Atoms of X in the Molecule</p><p>Δ G f 0 ( M , 298 K ) = Δ H f 0 ( M , 298 K ) − T Δ S f 0 ( M , 298 K ) (6)</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Lipinski’s Rules (Rule of Five)</title><p>Lipinski defined a set of rules for estimating the oral bioavailability of a compound from its two-dimensional (2D) structure. These rules concerning physico-chemical activities were defined after the analysis of 2245 drugs on the market or in the final phase of development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>➢ The molecular molar mass which must be less than 500 g/mol;</p><p>➢ The number of hydrogen bond acceptor atoms which must be less than or equal to 10;</p><p>➢ The number of hydrogen bond donor atoms which must be less than or equal to 5;</p><p>➢ The M LogP coefficient which must be less than or equal to 5.</p><p>Compounds whose physico-chemical activities do not satisfy at least 2 of the rules are highly likely to present absorption problems. These criteria correlate the physico-chemical activities with oral administration and a molecule for which two of the criteria are outside these limits is less likely to be absorbed orally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref24">24</xref>] . New compounds with better pIC<sub>50</sub> values than existing ones can be developed with the aim of improving research on antidiabetic drugs.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Area of Applicability of the Established Model</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> below represents the domain of applicability, the area in which the model can predict.</p><p>The values of the levers of the molecules are lower than the value of the threshold lever h*(h* = 0.882). Also, all molecules are inside the domain of applicability of the model.</p><p>Note that the alphabetical letters in the diagram are the molecule codes used to establish the mathematical model.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Prediction of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicity (ADMET)</title><p>o AIH (Human Intestinal Absorption) refers to the ability of the human intestine to absorb the drug. The greater the human intestinal absorption percentage, the better the human intestine absorbs the drug (0% - 20%) poor absorption; 20% - 70% medium absorption, 70% - 100% strong absorption.</p><p>o Caco-2 (nm/s) and MDCK (nm/s) predicts the intestinal permeability of a compound on Caco-2 cells (&lt;4 poor permeability, between 4 - 70 average permeability, &gt;70 high permeability) and MDCK.</p><p>o BBB (Blood Brain Barrier), this descriptor indicates the penetration of a compound to cross the blood-brain barrier which controls the passage of most compounds from the blood to the Central Nervous System (CNS).</p><p>o PBB (Plasma Protein Binding) predicts the degree of drug binding to proteins in the blood (&lt;90 low binding, &gt;90 high binding).</p><p>o Cytochromes P450 are key enzymes involved in the metabolism of different endogenous or exogenous molecules. They exist in several iso-forms (CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4) but the most important are the last two. The prediction of the interaction of our best inhibitors with these iso-forms was also. essential since the inhibition of these iso-enzymes is certainly one of the main causes of drug interactions resulting in toxic or adverse effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>o hERG (human Ether-to-go-go-Related Gene) hERG (human Ether-&#224;-go-go-Related Gene) is a gene encoding a voltage-gated potassium channel that moves potassium out of the cell. The blockage of this channel leads to fibrillations in cardiology which can lead to cardiac arrest.</p><p>o AMES-Test (Salmonella typhimurium reverse Mutation Assay) AMES-Test (Salmonella typhimurium reverse Mutation Assay) is a simple method to test the mutagenicity of a compound. It uses several strains of the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium carrying mutations in genes involved in the synthesis of histidine, so that they require histidine for their growth. This test consists in evaluating the ability of a compound to cause a mutation allowing a return to growth on a medium without histidine.</p><p>These different parameters were determined from the PreADMET online server [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126569-ref26">26</xref>] (https://preadmet.bmdrc.kr/).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Molecular Structures of New Thiadiazole Derivatives</title><p>The modification made to the molecular structures of the compounds in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> according to the form and nature of the substituents enabled us to propose new molecules. The different structures obtained codified (TH) are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The calculation of the frequencies of these different molecules at the level of the B3LYP 6-31+G (d, p) theory after geometric optimization, provides information</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Molecular structures of new thiadiazole derivatives</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecular structure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecular structure</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1710174x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>on the value of the bond angle (α(S-C-N)), the length of the bond L(C=N), the standard entropy of formation ( Δ S f 0 298K), and the dipole moment &#181;(D). Obtaining these values allowed us to predict the antidiabetic activity (pIC<sub>50</sub>) of these different molecules from the QSAR model obtained. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> presents the different values of the descriptors and the predicted pIC<sub>50</sub> of these compounds.</p><p>The study of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> indicates fourteen (14) new molecules obtained. With pIC<sub>50</sub> values between 2.532 and 2.751, the new molecules present pIC<sub>50</sub> higher than the pIC<sub>50</sub> of the base compound ranging from 2.320 to 2.526. This</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Model descriptors, predicted values of inhibitor concentration potential pIC<sub>50</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecules</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >l(C=N) (Å)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >α(S-CN)(ua)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δ S f 0 (kcal/moLK)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;(D)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pIC<sub>50</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >h<sub>ii</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.907</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.523</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.299</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.222</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.539</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.983</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.752</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.558</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.674</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.413</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.319</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.783</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.242</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.202</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.467</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.546</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.234</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.804</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.181</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.614</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.551</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.944</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.776</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.553</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.141</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.768</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.788</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.977</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.940</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.172</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.204</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.379</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.882</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.614</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.755</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>highlights that all new thiadiazole derivatives may be more active than the compounds in the experimental database.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> below gives us an idea of the appearance of the different levers of the 14 new compounds.</p><p>However, the lever of the TH8 molecule (h<sub>ii</sub> = 0.944) is greater than the threshold lever of the model (h* = 0.882). The prediction of the antidiabetic activity of this compound from the model is therefore doubtful.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Determination of Thermodynamic Quantities of Formation</title><p>The standard thermodynamic quantities of formation, such as the enthalpy of formation Δ H f 0 (kcal/mol), the entropy of formation Δ S f 0 (kcal/mol) and the free enthalpy of formation Δ G f 0 (kcal/mol) have were determined from the formula of Otchersky et al. in order to demonstrate the possibility of formation of new, more active 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives. It should be known that a variation of the enthalpy translates the thermicity of a chemical reaction, when that of the entropy provides information on the level of disorder in the system. On the other hand, a change in free enthalpy reflects the spontaneity with which the reaction occurs. The values of these calculated quantities are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>The results show that all the values of the standard thermodynamic quantities of molecule formation are negative. The negative values of the enthalpy and the free enthalpy translate respectively an exothermic reaction and a spontaneous reaction under the conditions of the study. With regard to entropy, a negative value reflects a decrease in disorder. Thus, the formation of all compounds occurs spontaneously with a release of heat and a decrease in disorder. At this</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Thermodynamic quantities of TH formations optimized at the B3LYP/6-31+G (d, p) level</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecules</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δ H f 0 (kcal/mol))</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δ G f 0 (kcal/mol)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δ S f 0 (kcal/mol/K<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1820.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1365.870</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.523</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1141.650</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−769.943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.246</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1205.114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−782.789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.416</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1292.445</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−803.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.639</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1078.268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−707.824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.242</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1219.628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−782.111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.467</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1234.409</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−831.811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.350</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1024.165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−667.092</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.197</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1437.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1016.463</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.410</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1437.534</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1112.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.090</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1156.447</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−769.929</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.296</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1080.590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−667.214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.386</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1370.291</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−864.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.696</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1233.948</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−752.657</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.614</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>level, we note that the quantities determined at the B3LYP/6-31+G (d, p) theory level confirm the formation of all these new compounds at the temperature of 298.15 K and 1 atm.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Determination of Lipinski Parameters</title><p>The determination of the Lipinski parameters, the values of which are recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, enabled us to verify the oral bioavailability of the molecules.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Lipinski parameters of new thiadiazole derivatives with improved antidiabetic activities</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecules (d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M (g/mol)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HBD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HBA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MlogP</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rule</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >363.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >391.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >443.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >441.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >423.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The quantities characterizing the determined Lipinski rule are the molar mass (M), the number of hydrogen donors (HBD), the number of hydrogen acceptors (HBA) and the lipophilicity (MlogP) were determined.</p><p>Analysis of the data in the table shows that the values of the molar mass of the compounds are less than 500 g/mol except for compound TH1 (510.50 g/mol) Also, the values of the number of hydrogen bond donor atoms (HBD) are all less than 5. As for the numbers of hydrogen bond acceptor atoms (HBA), they are all less than 10. At the level of (M Logp), all the values of our studied series are less than or equal to 4.15 (≤4.15). This parameter gives good intestinal absorption due to a good balance between solubility and permeability by passive diffusion according to this characteristic. Therefore, these compounds can be orally administrable drugs.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Prediction of the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicity (ADMET) of New Molecules</title><p>The prediction of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity of the new molecules was carried out from the online server PreADMET. We determined parameters such as, Human Intestinal Absorption (HIA), in vitro cell permeability caco-2, in vitro cell permeability MDCK (Mandin Darby Canine Kidney), plasma protein binding (PPB), penetration blood-brain barrier (BBB), inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2A4), inhibition of hERG (human Ether-&#224;-go-go-Related Gene), carcinogenicity and mutagenicity. These different parameters are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) parameters of new compounds with improved antidiabetic activity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Absorption</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Distribution</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Metabolism</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Toxicity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molecules</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caco-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MDCK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PPB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BBB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP2C19 Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP2C9 Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP2D6 Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP2D6 Substrat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP3A4 Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP3A4 Substrat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hERG Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Canc&#233;rog&#233;nicit&#233;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutag&#233;nicit&#233;</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="13"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mouse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(AMES-Test)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.954</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ambiguous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.942</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.334</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.830</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.217</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.479</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.973</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AVERAGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.681</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.553</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AVERAGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.746</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.448</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.866</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.374</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low Risk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mutagen</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>HIA (%) is the percentage of human intestinal absorption (from 0% - 20% poor absorption; from 20% - 70% medium absorption, from 70% - 100% strong absorption). Caco-2 (nm/s) and MDCK (nm/s) predict the intestinal permeability of a compound on Caco-2 (&lt;4 poor permeability, between 4 - 70 medium permeability, &gt;70 high permeability) and MDCK cells. PPB (Plasma Protein Binding%) predicts the degree of drug binding to proteins in the blood (&lt;90 low binding, &gt;90 high binding). BBB (Blood–Brain Barrier %) predicts the penetration of the blood-brain barrier (&lt;0.1 low absorption in the Central Nervous System (CNS), 0.1 - 2 medium absorption in the CNS and &gt;2 high absorption in the CNS). Cytochromes of P450 (CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP2A4) are important in the oxidative metabolism of compounds. hERG (human Ether-&#224;-go-go-Related Gene) is an ion (potassium) channel moving potassium out of its cell. AMES-Test (Salmonella typhimurium reverse Mutation Assay) predicts the mutagenic potential of a molecule.</p><p>Examination of the table shows us that at the level of absorption for values of human intestinal absorption (HIA) greater than 70%, suggests that these compounds are efficiently absorbed in the human intestine. Regarding the permeability on the Caco-2 cell, the values of the compounds (TH1, TH2, TH9, TH10, TH11) are less than 4 nm/s, therefore poor permeability and the other compounds have values between 4 and 27.4619 nm/s. These latter compounds have an average permeability as regards the permeability on the MDCK cell, the values are between 0.048 and 57.2175 nm/s, this shows that the new compounds are permeable on the Caco-2 and MDCK cells. Concerning the binding of plasma proteins (PPB), the values are greater than 90% for the compounds TH10 (93.969%), TH8 (97.752%), TH1 (100.000) and TH13 (92.374) hence a strong binding on plasma proteins. It is clear that the other compounds have poor BBB permeability, i.e. low absorption at the blood-brain barrier (CNS), except compound TH7, which has average BBB permeability.</p><p>Concerning the metabolism of xenobiotics, not all the compounds are inhibitors of the CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 enzymes except compound TH1 which inhibits the CYP2C9 enzyme. Not all the compounds are inhibitors and substrates of the CYP2D6 enzyme and only compound TH12 is an inhibitor and substrate of the CYP3A4 enzymes. We can say that all molecules can easily be metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 enzymes.</p><p>For the toxicity test, the compounds present a low and medium risk for Herg inhibition except for the TH1 molecule which presents an ambiguity for Herg inhibition. Compounds TH3, TH4, TH5, TH8, TH13, TH14 are non-carcinogenic in mice and rats, and mutagenic according to the AMES test. As a result, the proposed new molecules can therefore be like drugs because they have good properties of absorption, distribution, metabolism and toxicity.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The calculations carried out at the theoretical level DFT/B3LYP/6-31G+(d, p) were used to establish the model which enabled us to design 14 new compounds with higher activity values than those of the base molecules. The new thiadiazole derivatives belong to the domain of applicability except the TH8 molecule, so their predicted activity values are low. However, all fourteen (14) new molecules designed had inhibitory concentration potential (pIC<sub>50</sub>) values greater than the inhibitory concentration potential (pIC<sub>50</sub>) of the parent compound. Then the analysis of the thermodynamic quantities of formation showed that out of all fourteen (14) compounds can be formed. In addition, the data analysis respects Lipinski’s rule, and these molecules can therefore be administered orally. The study of the parameters of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) showed that the compounds have a good pharmacokinetic profile and can therefore be used as a drug. In perspective, the synthesis and in vitro tests of these new molecules could be useful in the fight against diabetes.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Dou, C.N.D., Dembele, G.S., Kone, M.G.-R., Tuo, N.T., Konate, F., Niare, A., Karamanis, P. and Ziao, N. (2023) Design of New Thiadiazole Derivatives with Improved Antidiabetic Activity. Computational Chemistry, 11, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.4236/cc.2023.113005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126569-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R. and Hilary, K. (2004) Global Prevalence of Diabetes: Estimates for the Year 2000 and Projection for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27, 1047-1053. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodier, M. (2001) Définition et classification du diabète. Imageriefonctionnelle et métabolique, Médecine Nucléaire, 25, 91-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saeedi, P., Petersohn, I., Salpea, P., Malanda, B., Karuranga, S., Unwin, N., Colagiuri, S., Guariguata, L., Motala, A., Ogurtsova, K., Shaw, J., Bright, D., Williams, R. and IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee (2019) Global and Regional Diabetes Prevalence Estimates for 2019 and Projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th Edition. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 157, Article ID: 107843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, B. and Srivastava, A. (2006) Diabetes Mellitus: Complications and Therapeutics. Medical Science Monitor, 12, 130-147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kittur, B., Sastry, B., Thakur, J.S.D. and Pattan, S. (2011) Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Some Novel 1, 3, 4-Thiadiaazoles for Antidiabetic Activity. Indian Journal of Chemistry, 50, 615-618.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kempgowda, S., Prakash, G.D. and Tamiz, M. (2011) Thiadiazoles: Progress Report on Biological Activities. Der Pharma Chemica, 3, 330-341.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamal, M., Shakya, A. and Talha, J. (2011) 1, 3, 4-Thiadiazoles as Antimicrobial Agent: A Review. International Journal of Biomedical Research, 2, 41-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, A., Mishra, G. and Jyoti, K. (2011) Review on Biological Activities of 1, 3, 4-Thiadiazole Derivatives. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 1, 44-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jalhan, S., Anil, J., Avneet, G. and Hemraj, (2012) Synthesis, Biological Activities and Chemistry of Thiadiazole Derivatives and Schiff Bases. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 5, 199-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siddiqui, N., Ahuja, P., Ahsan, W. and Alam, M. (2009) Thiadiazoles: Progress Report on Biological Activities. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 1, 19-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hemal, B., Dipansu, S., Biren, S., Dixit, C. and Mandev, P. (2011) Biological Profile of Thiadiazole. PharmacologyOnLine, 1, 528-543.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Roy, K., Kar, S. and Das, R.N. (2015) Statistical Methods in QSAR/QSPR. In: Roy, K., Kar, S. and Das, R.N., Eds., A Primer on QSAR/QSPR Modeling, Springer, Cham, 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17281-1_2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oprea, T.I. (2005) Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery. WILEY-VCH, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527603743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rekka, E.A. and Kourounakis, P.N. (2008) Chemistry and Molecular Aspects of Drug Design and Action. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420008272</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dou, C., Koné, M.R., Dembélé, G.S., Soro, D., Konaté, F. and Ziao, N. (2022) Development of a Predictive Model of the Antidiabetic Activity of a Thiadiazole Molecule Series by Density Functional Theory Method. Journal of Materials Physics and Chemistry, 10, 49-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shuker, S., Hajduk, P., Meadows, R. and Fesik, S. (1996) Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science, 274, 1531-1534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5292.1531</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuo, L. (2011) Fragment-Based Drug Design: Tools, Practical Approches and Examples. Academic Press, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konate, F., Diarrrassouba, F., Soro, D., Dembele, G., Koné, M.R., Konaté, B. and Ziao, N. (2021) Design of New Dihydrothiophenone Derivatives with Improved Anti-Malaria Activity. Mediterranean Journal of Chemistry, 11, 290-298.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembele, G., Tuo, N., Konaté, F., Soro, D., Konaté, B. and Ziao, N. (2022) Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) Study of Series of Molecules Derived from Thiazoline and Thiazine Multithioether against Antitumor Activity (A-549). International Journal of Chemical and Lifesciences, 11, 2426-2435.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembélé, G.S., Koné, M.G.R., Ouattara, B., Konate, F., Soro, D. and Ziao, N. (2022) Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Study of a Series of Chalcone Derivatives Inhibiting Plasmodium Falciparum 3D7. American Journal of Physical Chemistry, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpc.20221101.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembélé, G., Koné, M.G.R., Konate, F., Soro, D. and Ziao, N. (2022) Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Study of a Benzimidazole-Derived Series Inhibiting Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Computational Chemistry, 10, 71-96. https://doi.org/10.4236/cc.2022.102004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frisch, M.J., Trucks, G.W., Schlegel, H.B., Scuseria, G.E., Robb, M.A., Cheeseman, J.R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., et al. (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chase, M.W. (1985) JANAF Thermochemical Tables. 3rd Edition, American Institute of Physics, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lipinski, C.A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. and Feeney, P. (1997) Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 6, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2021) The Metabolism of a Drug. http://udsmed.u-strasbg.fr/pharmaco/pdf/DCEM1_Pharmacologie_chapitre_5_Metabolisme_des_medic.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126569-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, S., Chang, G., Lee, I., Chung, J., Sung, K. and No, K. (2021) PreADMET. https://preadmet.bmdrc.kr/</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>