Grape (
Vitis vinifera L.) is assumed as one of the most valuable and popular fruit crops all over the world. In this study, ten of local grape germplasm were characterized considering phenotypic diversity and genetic features under Egyptian conditions. Selected local grapes; Baltim Eswid, Edkawy, Matrouh Eswid, Bez El-Naka, Bez El-Anza, Romy Abiad, Romy Ahmer, Gharibi, Fayoumi and Banaty, were spread geographically among seven national governorates. A total of 58 attributes were characterized grape germplasm for the distinctness of vine parts. For molecular characterization, 9 nuclear SSR loci were analysed. Data revealed a broad sense of similarity at the level of studied morphological attributes, where the highest similarity (0.93) was between Romy Ahmer and Romy Abiad. A total of 24 alleles, ranging from 124 - 253 bp in size, were detected at the nine tested loci with an average of 2.67 alleles per locus. The amplification products in all of the 9 SSRs loci showed polymorphism among the 10 grapevine cultivars. The genetic relatedness among most of the cultivars was in accordance with their identification based on ampelographic properties. Data of phenotypic and molecular analysis revealed high variability of Vitis germplasm in Egypt and contributed substantially to our awareness of valuable local grape genetic resources which are on the verge of extinction.
Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) is assumed as one of the most valuable and popular fruit crops all over the world [1] . According to the Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database [2] , the estimated total production of grapes worldwide in 2021 was 73,524,196.23 metric tons, and commercial table grape production in Egypt was forecast to reach 1,435,000 metric tons where table grapes rank second after citrus fruits in terms of production quantities in Egypt. Cultivation of grape is geographically extended from Alexandria in the north to Aswan in the south, where Behira governorate represents about forty percent of the total grapes planted area in Egypt and eighteen percent of its total production [3] . The main factors that give table grapes the opportunity to be grown all over Egypt are; climate conditions, soil types and production technology.
Varieties identification and description is a very important stage in the certification program, ensuring the accuracy of breeding materials by type, germplasm improvement and preservation, and monitoring of the genetic quality. Morphological and pomological traits continue to be the first step to describing and classifying any germplasm, as well as useful tools for screening accessions for any population [4] .
Ampelographic characterization according to morphological features was useful in identifying famous grape cultivars and facilitated the illustration of ambiguous denominations or the establishment of phenological relationships. Ampelography is an accepted scientific methodology for the characterization of grapevine genotypes, based on the description of several morphological, phonological and pomological characteristics [4] . This method has been standardized and expanded by many scientists for a more reasonable and accurate identification of Vitis materials [5] [6] .
Microsatellites had been used to identify grape cultivars by [7] who proved that, microsatellite sequences that are often represented in the grapevine genome are very informative for the identification of Vitis vinifera genotypes. Considering the simplicity, quickness and efficiency of detecting microsatellite polymorphism even with a very little DNA quantity using PCR technique, [8] demonstrated the eligibility of microsatellites as molecular markers for genotyping in order to solve dilemmas of synonyms, homonyms or the origin of varieties, for relatedness and population genetic studies, also for molecular identification of clones and marker-assisted selection breeding purposes.
Many grape cultivars and varieties were characterized and evaluated at different regions of Egypt [4] [9] . However, most of those investigations were incompletely covered the target of local cultivars’ interest. These were led to decrease the proliferation of native cultivars in number and put them at risk of extinction. Thus, the aim of the study was to characterize ten of local grape germplasm considering phenotypic diversity and genetic features under Egyptian conditions.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Plant Materials
Selected local grapes identified by growers as Baltim Eswid (Kafr El-Shiekh governorate), Edkawy (El-Beheira governorate), Matrouh Eswid (Monofiya governorate), Bez El-Naka (El-Beheira governorate), Bez El-Anza (Giza governorate), Romy Abiad (Giza governorate), Romy Ahmer (Menia governorate), Gharibi (Fayoum governorate), Fayoumi (Fayoum governorate from three different locations) and Banaty (Dakahliya and Monofiya governorates) were considered for morphological and molecular characterization (Figure 1). The cultivars were propagated and cultivated from 2022 onwards at the experimental field of Agricultural Research Centre, Horticulture Research Institute, Egypt.
2.2. Ampelographic Descriptions
Ampelographic data were collected during 2021 & 2022. Preparations and procedures of grape genetic resources (GRs) collection were conducted following the procedures of [10] - [16] . Grape descriptors were applied according to [17] . All morphological descriptors followed [18] terminologically as listed in Table 2. Data were recorded on 10-random healthy in each accession at specified plant growth stage when the attributes had expressed totally. Quantitative attributes were scored as an average of ten random accessions.
Data were described the morphological criteria and calculated average of all quantitative attributes. Data fed into the descriptive statistics with XLSTAT software to compute all attributes.
2.3. Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Analysis
For each sample, young leaves (1 - 2 cm of diameter) were collected and DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) according to the manufacturer protocol, where the DNA was finally eluted with 50 μl of TE buffer. The quality of the extracted DNA was assessed by gel-electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels and the concentration of DNA was determined by means of NanoDrop Spectrophotometry (MicroDigital, Korea). Then after, the extracted DNA was stored at −80˚C till further molecular analysis.
For molecular characterization using microsatellite, the samples were analysed by nine nuclear SSR loci (Table 1), which were previously used in genotyping of grapevine collection according to [19] [20] . This set of SSRs was selected based on their position in the linkage groups of Vitis vinifera to cover the whole genome and their capability to distinguish closely related grapevine genotypes.
PCR amplifications were carried out in 25 μl final volume reaction mixtures using a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA), where 3 μl of DNA template, 1 μl
Sequences of Simple Sequence Repeat primers (SSRs) used for grapevine genotyping
Primer
Sequence (5'-3')
Reference
VVMD5
Forward
CTAGAGCTACGCCAATCCAA
[21]
Reverse
TATACCAAAAATCATATTCCTAAA
VVMD7
Forward
AGAGTTGCGGAGAACAGGAT
[22]
Reverse
CGAACCTTCACACGCTTGAT
VVMD21
Forward
GGTTGTCTATGGAGTTGATGTTGC
[22]
Reverse
GCTTCAGTAAAAAGGGATTGCG
VVMD24
Forward
GTGGATGATGGAGTAGTCACGC
[22]
Reverse
GATTTTAGGTTCATGTTGGTGAAGG
VVMD27
Forward
GTACCAGATCTGAATACATCCGTAAGT
[22]
Reverse
ACGGGTATAGAGCAAACGGTGT
VVMD32
Forward
TATGATTTTTTAGGGGGGTGAGG
[22]
Reverse
GGAAAGATGGGATGACTCGC
VVS2
Forward
CAGCCCGTAAATGTATCCATC
[7]
Reverse
AAATTCAAAATTCTAATTCAACTGG
VrZAG62
Forward
GGTGAAATGGGCACCGAACACACGC
[19]
Reverse
CCATGTCTCTCCTCAGCTTCTCAGC
VrZAG79
Forward
AGATTGTGGAGGAGGGAACAAACCG
[19]
Reverse
TGCCCCCATTTTCAAACTCCCTTCC
of each primer (Willowfort), 12.5 μl of Cosmo PCR red master mix (Willowfort, UK) and 7.5 μl of nuclease free water were included in each reaction. The thermal profile of PCR reaction was programmed as follows: initial denaturation at 94˚C for 4 min, followed by 36 of repeated cycles where each consisted of; denaturation at 94˚C for 1 min, annealing at 56˚C or 60˚C (only for VrZag62 and VrZag79) for 45 s and extension at 72˚C for 1 min, then final extension at 72˚C for 20 min [23] .
Afterwards, amplicons were analysed with agarose gel electrophoresis (BioRad, USA) where the products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gel in 1x TBE (10x: 0.45 M Tris-borate, 0.01 M Na2EDTA, pH 8) and ethidium bromide staining, then photographed using Gel Documentation System (UVITEC Cambridge, UK). The molecular size of fragments was estimated by reference to the 100 bp DNA ladder (GeneDireX). Each amplification reaction was conducted twice to confirm the obtained results.
The polymorphic information content (PIC) and heterozygosity values were calculated for each SSR locus by using Gene-Calc online bioinformatics tool. PCR fragments on gels were recorded as one “1” if presence or zero “0” if absence for all samples, then a binary statistic matrix was constructed. Similarity matrices correlation between accessions were calculated using Dice coefficient, then this matrix was used to construct a phylogenetic dendrogram with Unweighted Pair-Group Average method (UPGMA) using XLSTAT software.
3. Results3.1. Morphological Characterization of Egyptian Grape Cultivars3.1.1. Polymorphism of Grape Morphological Criteria
A total of 58 attributes were characterized ten Egyptian grape germplasm for the distinctness of vine parts, where no morphological variations were detected for different locations of Fayoumi or Banaty cultivars. A broad sense of polymorphism is notably data as shown in Table 2 & Figure 2. Some grape cultivars have a differentiate in an attribute of form of tip (Matrouh Eswid), erect hairs on internodes (Gharibi), petiole sinus limited by vein (Fayoumi), presence of seeds (Banaty) and particular flavor (Bez El-Anza). Other more germplasm shared distinctness in an attribute. These are density of erect hairs on tip, density of prostrate hairs on tip, density of erect hairs on node, density of prostrate hairs on node, density of prostrate hairs on internode, number of consecutive tendrils, density of prostrate hairs on main veins, density of prostrate hairs between veins, density of erect hairs on main veins, density of erect hairs between veins, anthocyanin coloration of main veins on upper side of blade, profile of mature leaf, length of teeth and size of grape.
3.1.2. Correlation Indices of Grape Germplasm According to Morphological Criteria
Correlation matrix of ten grape germplasm was calculated as shown in Table 3. Data revealed a broad sense of similarity at the level of studied morphological attributes. The lowest similarity (0.24) was scored between Gharibi and Banaty. The highest similarity (0.93) was between Romy Ahmer and Romy Abiad.
The binary data were used to estimate the ampelographic similarity among the 10 grape genotypes Figure 3, where they formed two distinctive clusters. The first cluster (C1) contained only Gharibi cultivar. While, the second cluster (C2) included four groups; the first group contained the only seedless cultivar (Banaty), while the second group included the three black berries cultivars (Edkawy, Baltim Eswid & Matrouh Eswid), the third group composed of Bez El-Anza, Romy Ahmer, & Romy Abiad, and finally the fourth group contained Bez El-Naka & Fayoumi.
Descriptors for Egyptian grape cultivars
Trait
Baltim Eswid
Edkawy
Matrouh Eswid
Bez El-Naka
Bez El-Anza
Romy Abiad
Romy Ahmer
Gharibi
Fayoumi
Banaty
Young shoot
Form of tip
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Anthocyanin coloration of tip
1
5
0
5
1
0
0
5
0
0
Density of prostrate hairs on tip
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
Density of erect hairs on tip
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
Shoot
Attitude
3
5
2
5
1
2
3
1
5
2
Color of dorsal side of internode
2
2
1
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
Color of ventral side of internode
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
Color of dorsal side of node
2
1
1
2
2
1
3
3
2
1
Color of ventral side of node
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
1
Density of erect hairs on node
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
Erect hairs on internode
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Density of prostrate hairs on node
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
Density of prostrate hairs on internode
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Number of consecutive tendrils
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Length of tendril
3
5
5
7
1
1
3
5
5
5
Young leaf
Color of upper surface
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Density of prostrate hairs between veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
Density of erect hairs between veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
Density of prostrate hairs on main veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
Density of erect hairs on main veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Mature leaf
Size of blade
5
5
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
7
Shape of blade
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
Number of lobes
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
4
3
Anthocyanin coloration of main veins on upper side of blade
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Profile
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
Blistering of blade upper surface
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Shape of teeth
2
3
3
5
3
3
5
2
2
3
Length of teeth
5
3
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
Ratio length/width of teeth
5
3
5
5
3
5
3
5
5
3
General shape of petiole sinus
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
1
2
3
Tooth at petiole sinus
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
Petiole sinus limited by veins
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Shape of upper lateral sinus
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Depth of upper lateral sinus
5
5
3
9
5
5
5
7
5
7
Density of prostrate hairs between veins
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Density of erect hairs between veins
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Density of prostrate hairs on main veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Density of erect hairs on main veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
Prostrate hairs on main veins
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Length of petiole compared to middle vein
3
2
1
3
4
2
3
2
2
3
Woody shoot
Surface
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
Main color
4
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
Inflorescence and fruit inflorescence
Sex of flower
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Bunch
Size
7
7
7
5
5
7
7
7
5
1
Density
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
7
9
Length of peduncle
5
5
3
3
3
7
5
7
5
9
Berry
Size
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
1
Shape
4
6
3
9
1
4
4
3
5
4
Presence of seeds
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
Skin color (without bloom)
6
6
5
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
Anthocyanin coloration of flesh
9
7
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Juiciness of flesh
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
Firmness of flesh
3
2
2
1
3
3
2
3
1
1
Particular flavor
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Ease of detachment from pedicel
1
2
1
3
2
3
1
1
3
2
Seed length
7
5
5
5
5
7
7
5
5
3
100-seed weight
5
9
5
7
5
7
7
7
9
1
Transversal ridges on side
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Correlation matrix of grape cultivars according to morphological criteria
Cultivars
Baltim Eswid
Edkawy
Matrouh Eswid
Bez El-Naka
Bez El-Anza
Romy Abiad
Romy Ahmer
Gharibi
Fayoumi
Banaty
Baltim Eswid
1.00
Edkawy
0.85
1.00
Matrouh Eswid
0.86
0.84
1.00
Bez El-Naka
0.65
0.82
0.74
1.00
Bez El-Anza
0.72
0.73
0.80
0.77
1.00
Romy Abiad
0.78
0.79
0.82
0.80
0.89
1.00
Romy Ahmer
0.81
0.84
0.85
0.83
0.88
0.93
1.00
Gharibi
0.35
0.31
0.28
0.36
0.37
0.42
0.37
1.00
Fayoumi
0.68
0.81
0.78
0.87
0.77
0.89
0.86
0.35
1.00
Banaty
0.52
0.55
0.60
0.69
0.66
0.68
0.65
0.24
0.70
1.00
3.2. Molecular Characterization of Egyptian Grape Cultivars3.2.1. SSR Analysis of Grape
A total of 24 alleles, ranging from 124 - 253 bp in size, were detected at 9 tested loci with an average of 2.67 alleles per locus Table 4. The amplification products in all of the 9 SSRs loci showed polymorphism among the 10 grapevine cultivars, neither Fayoumi nor Banaty samples collected from different locations were genetically identical. The total number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 for VVMD5, VrZAG62 and VrZAG79 to 3 for the rest. The primer heterozygosity ranged from 0. 0.34 (VrZAG62) to 0.60 (VVMD7). The average PIC value of the 9 SSR markers used is 0.43 with the highest values of 0.52 for VVMD7, VVMD21 & VVMD24, and 0.51 for VVMD27, and the lowest of 0.28 for VrZAG62, where informative primers are shown by PIC values ≥ 0.5 [24] , whereas primers with higher PIC values are superior to be use as molecular markers.
3.2.2. Correlation Indices of Grape Germplasm According to Genetical Criteria
The dendrogram based on SSR similarity indices as shown in Figure 4, separated the 10 grape genotypes into two distinctive clusters. The first cluster (C1) included, the two black berries cultivars (Baltim Eswid & Matrouh Eswid) in a group, and the two cultivars which belongs to El-Beheira governorate (Edkawy & Bez El-Naka) in another one. The second cluster (C2) included two main groups, the first group contained Fayoumi and Bez El-Anza, while the second group was composed of the only seedless cultivar (Banaty) in a sub-group and Romy Ahmer, Gharibi & Romy Abiad in another one.
4. Discussion
Plant descriptors is a key vital to utilization for various specialists [25] [26] and can help for “1” managing the strategy of collections, “2” the capacity to manage in gene bank, and “3” facilitating the exchange of the GRs and information [27] . These results are in the same line with [4] [9] . [28] evaluated ten grape cultivars and hybrids grown in South region of turkey. [9] characterized ten cultivars grown under Assuit climatic conditions morphologically. [4] evaluated six newly-introduced grape cultivars under Egyptian conditions.
This investigation supported the utilization of morphological descriptors as an approach of measuring genetic similarity [26] . The association between procedures suggested that, the morphological traits will continue to be useful to inexpensively identify diverse germplasm. The results between various approaches may be due to contravention data recording and between the procedures of biostatistics also. The measuring variability and its structure might still require more investigation under various eco-environment conditions and decisions on a specific, optimal, and sampling strategy.
PCR results statics as revealed by 9 SSR markers among the 10 grape cultivars
Primer
No. of alleles
Allele size (bp)
Polymorphic information content
Primer heterozygosity
VVMD5
2
212 - 224
0.34
0.43
VVMD7
3
213 - 242
0.52
0.60
VVMD21
3
211 - 232
0.52
0.59
VVMD24
3
182 - 195
0.52
0.59
VVMD27
3
160 - 173
0.51
0.59
VVMD32
3
223 - 248
0.34
0.38
VVS2
3
124 - 137
0.46
0.52
VrZAG62
2
163 - 177
0.28
0.34
VrZAG79
2
243 - 253
0.34
0.43
Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR), as one of various marker systems, was reported by [29] as the most preferential and reliable marker for genotyping in grapevine due to its high polymorphism, abundance in the genome, co-dominant nature and inheritance in Mendelian manner.
The genetic relatedness among most of the tested cultivars was in accordance with their identification based on ampelographic properties. For example, the two black berries cultivars (Baltim Eswid & Matrouh Eswid) were represented close relatedness using both ampelographic and molecular tools recording 0.86 and 0.78, respectively. On the other hand, according to both ampelographic and genetic relatedness, the two cultivars which belongs to Fayoum governorate (Gharibi & Fayoumi) affiliated under two different groups, while Gharibi instead shared one group under the same cluster using molecular tools with Romy Abiad which is the closest using ampelographic properties (0.42). Additionally, both ampelographic and molecular tools confirmed the closest related to Romy Abiad is Romy Ahmer (0.93 and 0.60, respectively), while both belongs to different governorates (Giza and Menia, respectively).
Although microsatellite loci proved to be a useful tool to differentiate among grapevine cultivars based on their genotypic diversity, this method showed that the genetic relatedness among the characterized cultivars was not always in accordance with their classification based on ampelographic properties. [30] proposed that this may be due to the tested SSR markers are not part of the genome coding for these morphological traits. It was suggested that, further studies targeting more SSR loci as well as other genetic markers such as Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) might further strengthen the genetic relatedness among the identified cultivars of grapevine.
The potential of both phenotypic and molecular tools for solving problems of cultivar identification was reported by many authors. [31] explained that, the absence of a comprehensive germplasm database and problems in naming of various cultivars are between many factors makes these tools suitable for genotyping purposes.
5. Conclusion
In this investigation, ten cultivars that barely exist in old Egyptian vineyards were identified, recovered and characterized. Data of phenotypic and molecular analysis revealed high variability of Vitis germplasm in Egypt and contributed substantially to our awareness of valuable local grape genetic resources that are on the verge of extinction, which in turn reinforces the protection of endangered local grape biodiversity. Moreover, utilization of native genetic resources described here may contribute to the development of viticulture in Egypt.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by “Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STIFA)”, grant number “PRIMA”, within the framework of the project “FRUIT CROPS RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN BASIN (FREECLIMB)”.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Mahmoud, R.A., Dahab, A.A., Mahmoud, G.A., El-Aziz Abd El-Wahab, M.A., El-Bassel, E.H. and Mahdy, E.M.B. (2023) Ampelographic and Genetic Diversity Assessment of Some Local Grape Genotypes under Egyptian Conditions. American Journal of Molecular Biology, 13, 183-196. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2023.133013
ReferencesMohsen, F.S. (2021) Effect of Some Rootstocks on the Performance of Flame Seedless Grapevines. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 48, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejoh.2020.47060.1145Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020) Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database.
https://www.fao.org/statistics/en/USDA (2020) Egypt: Overview of Egypt’s Table Grape Sector.
https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/egypt-overview-egypts-table-grape-sectorEl-Morsy, F.M., Gaser, A.S.A. and Mohamed, M.N. (2017) Morphological Description and Evaluation of Six Newly-Introduced Grape Cultivars under Egyptian Conditions. Journal of Plant Production, 8, 1059-1070.
https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2017.41111Soylemezoglu, G., Agaoglu, Y.S. and Uzun, H.I. (2001) Ampelographic Characteristics and Isozymic Analysis of Vitis vinifera spp. Sylvestris Gmel. in Southwestern Turkey. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 15, 106-113.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2001.10819140Santiago, J.L., Boso, S., Gago, P., Alonso-Villaverde, V. and Martinez, M.C. (2007) Molecular and Ampelographic Characterization of Vitis vinifera L. “Albarino”, “Savagnin Blanc” and “Caíno Blanco” Shows That They Are Different Cultivars. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 333-340.
https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2007053-253Thomas, M.R. and Scott, N.S. (1993) Microsatellite Repeats in Grapevine Reveal DNA Polymorphism When Analysed as Sequence-Tagged Sites (STSs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 86, 985-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211051Jakse, J., Stajner, N., Tomic, L. and Javornik, B. (2013) Application of Microsatellite Markers in Grapevine and Olives. In: Poljuha, D. and Sladonja, B., Eds., The Mediterranean Genetic Code: Grapevine and Olive, IntechOpen, London.
https://doi.org/10.5772/53411Mohamed, A.K.A., Shaaban, M.M., Ibrahim, R.A., Thabet, S.A. and Amein, K.A. (2020) Morphological Study on Ten Grape Cultivars Grown under Assiut Climatic Conditions. SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2, 21-26.
https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijas.2020.23110.1001Bennett, E. (1970) Tactics of Plant Exploration. In: Frankel, O.H. and Bennett, E., Eds., Genetic Resources in Plants: Their Exploration and Conservation, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford and Edinburgh, 157-179.Harlan, J.R. (1975) Practical Problems in Exploration: Seed Crops. In: Frankel, O.H. and Hawkes, J.G., Eds., Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow, Cambridge University Press, London, 111-115.Marshall, D.R. and Brown, A.H.D. (1975) Optimum Sampling Strategies in Genetic Conservation. In: Frankel, O.H. and Hawkes, J.G., Eds., Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow, Cambridge University Press, London, 53-80.Hawkes, J.G. (1976) Manual for Field Collectors (Seed Crops). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, FAO, Rome.Hawkes, J.G. (1980) Crop Genetic Resources: A Field Collection Manual. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) and the European Association for Research on Plant Breeding (EUCARPIA), Rome, 37 p.Arora, R.K. (1981) Plant Genetic Resources Exploration and Collection: Planning and Logistics. In: Mehra, K.L., Arora, R.K. and Wadhi, S.R., Eds., Plant Exploration and Collection, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources Science Monograph 3. NBPGR, New Delhi, 46-54.Chang T.T. ,et al. (1985)Germplasm Enhancement and Utilisation Iowa State Journal of Research 59, 399-424.IPGRI, UPOV, OIV (1997) Descriptors for Grapevine (Vitis spp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome; International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva; Office International de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris.Stearn, W.T. (1973) Botanical Latin: History, Grammar, Syntax, Terminology and Vocabulary. David and Charles, Newton Abbot, England.Sefc, K.M., Regner, F., Turetschek, E., Glossl, J. and Steinkellner, H. (1999) Identification of Microsatellite Sequences in Vitis riparia and Their Applicability for Genotyping of Different Vitis Species. Genome, 42, 367-373.
https://doi.org/10.1139/g98-168Laucou, V., Lacombe, T., Dechesne, F., Siret, R., Bruno, J.-P., Dessup, M., Dessup, T., Ortigosa, P., Parra, P., Roux, C., Santoni, S., Varès, D., Péros, J.P., Boursiquot, J.-M. and This, P. (2011) High Throughput Analysis of Grape Genetic Diversity as a Tool for Germplasm Collection Management. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 1233-1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1527-yBowers, J.E., Dangl, G.S., Vignani, R. and Meredith, C.P. (1996) Isolation and Characterization of New Polymorphic Simple Sequence Repeat Loci in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Genome, 39, 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1139/g96-080Bowers, J.E., Dangl, G.S. and Meredith, C.P. (1999) Development and Characterization of Additional Microsatellite DNA Markers for Grape. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 50, 243-246. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1999.50.3.243De Lorenzis, G., Imazio, S., Biagini, B., Failla, O. and Scienza, A. (2013) Pedigree Reconstruction of the Italian Grapevine Aglianico (Vitis vinifera L.) from Campania. Molecular Biotechnology, 54, 634-642.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-012-9605-9Zhang, Z., Deng, Y., Tan, J., Hu, S., Yu, J. and Xue, Q. (2007) A Genome-Wide Microsatellite Polymorphism Database for the Indica and Japonica Rice. DNA Research, 14, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsm005Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2008) FAO Statistics.
http://faostat.fao.org/Mahdy E.M.B., Soliman S.S., Fayed A.H. and Hassan N.A. ,et al. (2012)Morphological and Cytogenetical Characterization for Eight Egyptian Accessions of Jew’s Mallow Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 409-418.Gotor, E., Alercia, A., Ramanatha Rao, V., Watts, J. and Caracciolo, F. (2008) The Scientific Information Activity of Bioversity International: The Descriptor Lists. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 55, 757-772.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9342-xAtes, F., Coban, H., Kara, Z. and Sabir, A. (2011) Ampelographic Characterization of Some Grape Cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) Grown in Southwestern Region of Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 17, 314-324.Motha, K., Singh, S.K., Singh, A.K., Singh, R., Srivastav, M., Verma, M.K. and Bhardwaj, C. (2018) Molecular Characterization and Genetic Relationships of Some Stress Tolerant Grape Rootstock Genotypes as Revealed by ISSR and SSR Markers. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology, 28, 77-90.
https://doi.org/10.3329/ptcb.v28i1.37200Darlssa, O.M., Rajabi, S. and Iraki, N.M. (2013) Genotyping of Sixteen Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivars in Palestine Using Microsatellite Markers. Bethlehem University Journal, 32, 12-23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26447525Ferlito, F., Nicolosi, E., La Malfa, S., Cicala, A. and Gentile, A. (2018) First Characterisation of Minor and Neglected Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars from Mount Etna. Horticultural Science, 45, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.17221/198/2016-HORTSCI