<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2023.137098</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-126352</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Frequency of Cervix Dysplasia in Women with Prolapsed Uterus: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study at Panzi General Referral Hospital
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nadine</surname><given-names>Neema Rukunghu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Olivier</surname><given-names>Nyakio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eloge</surname><given-names>Ilunga-Mbaya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chasinga</surname><given-names>Baharanyi Tchass</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kongwa</surname><given-names>Madoli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dieudonné</surname><given-names>Kakusu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Julien</surname><given-names>Bwama Botalatala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eric</surname><given-names>Munguakonkwa Ntagereka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Denis</surname><given-names>Mukwege</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Panzi General Referral Hospital, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine, Evangelical University in Africa, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1142</fpage><lpage>1150</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: 
  According to the WHO (January 7, 2022), cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide among women of childbearing age. However, cervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable due to its well-known disease history which goes through several detectable pre-cancerous phases with available treatments. There are very few data on the prevalence of dysplastic lesions of the cervix in the 
  Democratic Republic of the Congo
  . Panzi General Referral Hospital 
  is
   a care center for women with genital prolapse, 
  and 
  our study aimed to determine the prevalence of dysplastic lesions of the cervix in this particular population. <b>Methodology: </b>This is a cross-sectional study 
  of
   all women aged ≥ 18
   
  years who consulted at the HGR Panzi from September 01 to December 31, 2022, diagnosed with uterine prolapse and who consented to the study. <b>Results</b>: The mean (&#177;SD) age of the patients was 47.44 (&#177;14.42) years and the majority (67.7%) of them were aged 40 and over. For all of the respondents, the Pap smear was normal in 62.6% and inflammatory in 2% of cases, while cytological abnormalities, which were found in 35.4% of cases, including 12.1% of lesions high-grade dysplastic (HSIL), i.e. 12 out of a total of 99 women examined. <b>Conclusion: </b>Women with uterine prolapse are twice as likely to develop dysplastic lesions as the general female population. A screening and management program for these lesions is essential in our preoperative protocol at the HGR Panzi and at the national level in general.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cervical Dysplasia</kwd><kwd> Uterine Prolapse</kwd><kwd> Panzi General Hospital</kwd><kwd> DRC</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dysplasia corresponds to a morphological alteration of the cervix testifying to the existence of a neoplastic process at an early, non-invasive stage.</p><p>According to the WHO, cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among women of reproductive age worldwide. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref1">1</xref>] In 2018, 90% of deaths from cervical cancer in the world occurred in low-income countries due to lack of screening and treatment. Human papillomavirus is the causative agent of cervical cancer in 99% of cases. Several factors contribute to the increase in cervical cancer in developing countries: lack of screening, early sexual debut, multiple sexual partners and sexually transmitted infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref2">2</xref>] . It is also sometimes suggested, without clear evidence, that in women with Uterovaginal prolapse, the extravaginal location of the uterus is a protective factor against cervical cancer, while others believe that the development of a neoplastic lesion is related to epithelial erosion from rubbing against clothing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Cervical cancer is a preventable public health threat because its history is well known and it passes through several detectable pre-cancerous stages for which different treatment strategies are available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref4">4</xref>] . Screening is currently based on cytological analysis following a cervical smear. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref5">5</xref>] In Africa, the incidence of cervical cancer is increasing every year. East Africa, like other parts of the continent, has cervical cancer incidence (42.7 per 100,000) and mortality (27.6 per 100,000) rates significantly higher than the global incidence (14.0 per 100,000) and mortality (6.8 per 100,000). [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref5">5</xref>] However, epidemiological data on cervical cancer are not well documented in most sub-Saharan African countries. Only 17% of African countries have a national programme and specific budget for cervical cancer control, and where a programme exists, actual coverage may be low [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the health system is poorly structured and underfunded, and many health structures have been destroyed as a result of armed conflict, particularly in the east of the country, where surviving hospitals are often poorly equipped and lack qualified medical staff [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>There is very little data on the prevalence of cervical dysplasia in the DRC. This could be extrapolated from data in sub-Saharan Africa. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref7">7</xref>] In 2019, the study conducted by Nyakio et al. in Bukavu (eastern of the Democratic Republic of the Congo) found a prevalence of 14.72% of cervical cytopathological abnormalities in the general female population, with 5.28% of cervical dysplasia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Thus, as a reference center for the management of genital prolapse in eastern DRC, our study was conducted to determine the prevalence of cervical dysplastic lesions in women diagnosed with uterine prolapse.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Type, Population and Study Setting</title><p>This is a descriptive cross-sectional study of all women aged ≥ 18 years who consulted at HGR Panzi from 01 September to 31 December 2022, who were diagnosed with uterine prolapse and who consented to the study. During the study period, we systematically recruited patients using a non-probabilistic sampling method with no pre-determined quota. Underage girls, women followed up for cervical cancer and all of those who did not consent to the study were excluded from the study</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection</title><p>At general medical and gynaecological consultations, all women with uterine prolapse (all stages combined) who consented to our study underwent a cervical smear test after instruction by trained and qualified medical staff.</p><p>The cytopathological analysis allowed us to describe the different cytopathological aspects of the squamous intraepithelial lesions according to the Bethesda 2001 system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref9">9</xref>] :</p><p>* Absence of intraepithelial lesions;</p><p>* Inflammatory smears;</p><p>* Metaplasia (non-neoplastic transformation);</p><p>* Epithelial cell abnormalities;</p><p>- Of undetermined significance (ASC-US)</p><p>- High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) cannot be excluded</p><p>* Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL - LMIEBG);</p><p>* High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL - LMIEHG);</p><p>(including lesions formerly known as moderate and severe dysplasia, CIN2, CIN3 and CIS)</p><p>* Squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p>Women with abnormal cytopathology were counselled after testing and referred for management or follow-up.</p><p>Slides were read by two pathologists independently using an Olympus CX23 light microscope. If both readers agreed on the same findings, the conclusion was maintained. If there was disagreement, a third pathologist was required and the conclusion was that shared by the two readers.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Processing and Analysis</title><p>Data were collected from a register of codes, names and cytopathology results, and were entered and cleaned using Microsoft Excel 2016. Data were presented as tables and figures. Descriptive statistics were used Categorical variables were summarised by frequencies and their percentages.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Ethical Considerations</title><p>We obtained the approval of the South Kivu Provincial Ethics Committee and the consent of each patient with a guarantee of confidentiality.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>From 1 September to 31 December 2022, a total of 99 women who met our criteria were enrolled and all received a cervical smear (CUS) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 99 (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age group (years)/ mean (&#177;SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.44 (&#177;14.39) years</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (30.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69 (67) 69.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics (cytopathological appearance)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 99 (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence of lesions = normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (32.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inflammatory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metaplasia (mild and severe)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (30.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASCUS (atypia)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AUC-G (atypia)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dysplasia (LGD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (20.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dysplasia (HGD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (12.1)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The mean age (&#177;SD) of the patients was 47.44 (&#177;14.42) years and the majority (67.7%) were over 40 years of age. In our sample, 62.6% were married, 27.3% were widows and 85.3% were illiterate.</p><p>We found cytological abnormalities in 35 women with uterine prolapse or 35.3% of our sample. Of these, 12 women, or 12.1%, had high-grade dysplasia/squamous lesions.</p><p>We divided these characteristics into two groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>):</p><p>- normal smear: absence of lesions, inflammatory smear and metaplasia</p><p>- abnormal smear: cellular atypia and dysplasia</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to clinical characteristics and smoking</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n = 99 (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean parity (&#177;SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (&#177;2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multipara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (39.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grand multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 (60.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age at first sexual intercourse (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (11 - 21) years</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 (75.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (24.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contraception</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98 (99.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Smoking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 (90.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (9.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of sexual partners</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 (84.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (12.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (3.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Menopause</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (51.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (48.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (12.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Second</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (56.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Third</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (16.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fourth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (15.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Externalized</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (32.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internalized</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 (67.7)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>More than half of the women were grand multiparous (60.6%), with an average of 8 &#177; 2 children. The majority of them had had their first sexual intercourse between the ages of 11 and 21 (75.8%), and 84.8% had known only one sexual partner. The majority of women did not use tobacco (90.9%), did not use contraception (99%) and just over half (51.5%) were postmenopausal. Several of them (56.6%) had a second degree prolapse and in 67.7% the prolapse was internalized. We did not find any patient with HIV positive (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Association between degree of prolapse and cytopathological appearance</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cytopathological aspect</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anormal [n = 35 (35%)]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal [n = 64 (65%)]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (66.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (33.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Second</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (32.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (67.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Third</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (43.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (56.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fourth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (86.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>We find a statistically significant association between the degree of prolapse and the cytopathological aspect (p = 0.028) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Almost half of the women were aged 40 years and over (67.7%) with a median age of 47 years Our observations are similar to those of Yesessaian A et al. in the USA who found a median age of 42 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref10">10</xref>] . A similar study was conducted by S&#246;derlund S et al. in Sweden who found a median age of 43.5 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref11">11</xref>] , while Catarino R et al. in Cameroon found a median age of 39 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref12">12</xref>] . This is explained by the fact that the majority of women who consult for uterine prolapse are grand multiparous and therefore about 8 children on average per woman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>• Early age at first sexual intercourse is one of the risk factors for the occurrence of dysplastic lesions of the cervix documented by the vast majority of authors. Compared to our results (75.8%), Catarino R et al. had reported in their series in Cameroon that 69.4% of women had their first sexual intercourse before the age of 19 and Olivier N. et al. found in their series that 67.5% of women had their first sexual intercourse between the ages of 15 and 20. Lack of schooling and early marriages are one explanation for this phenomenon.</p><p>• The multiplicity of sexual partners constitutes, in the same way as the precocity of the age at first sexual intercourse, a risk factor for the occurrence of cervical dysplastic lesions. In the series by Olivier N. et al., the number of sexual partners did not mostly exceed five (87%). In contrast to the results in our series, the number of sexual partners was mostly 1 (84.8%) with only 3 women out of 99 having had more than three partners.</p><p>• Overall, the majority of authors reported a considerable rate of multiparous women in their studies on dysplastic lesions of the cervix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref15">15</xref>] , which is in the same order as the results of the similar study in the DRC by Olivier N. and coll. Our series did not find any nullipara or primipara. All our respondents were either multiparous (39.4%) or grand multiparous (60.6%). This confirms the reason for consultation of women (presence of a mass in and outside the vagina) and the total ignorance rotakce on cervical cancer and how to prevent it.</p><p>• The rate of dysplastic lesions was significantly higher in postmenopausal women. The sensitivity of cytology and HPV testing seems to decrease in older women and colposcopy also becomes more difficult because more lesions are inside the endocervical canal after menopause and are less amenable to examination. colposcopic detection. Therefore, the focus is on ensuring adequate screening between ages 45 and 65, rather than continuing screening later in life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>• The use of hormonal contraception in women carrying an oncogenic human papillomavirus multiplies by four the risk of progression to cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref17">17</xref>] . In our study, only 1% of women had used hormonal contraception. Catarino R et al. found in their study in Cameroon a very low rate of women using hormonal contraception (13.9%) but still higher than ours. The population is Christian and the churches discourage the use of contraceptive methods other than natural methods.</p><p>• Tobacco use is one of the risk factors for cervical cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref17">17</xref>] . Our study reveals a low rate of women who use tobacco (9.1%). Shin SS et al. in India had a much lower rate than ours of 1.8% of women who had ever used tobacco [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>• In 2019, the study by Nyakio et al. in South Kivu (Eastern DRC) found a prevalence of 14.72% of cytological abnormalities in women in sexual activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref8">8</xref>] . Contrary to our study, the risk is multiplied by two in women with prolapse. Our study also found 15 times more high-grade dysplastic lesions in women with prolapse than in the sexually active female population, i.e. 12.1% versus 0.8%. Wang JJ et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126352-ref19">19</xref>] in China found: a normal FCU in 71.7% of cases versus 14.8% ASCUS; 8.7% LSIL and 2.3% HSIL. This would be explained by the fact of this chronic inflammation or erosion by the vestimentary tissues of the exteriorized collar.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The high frequency of dysplastic lesions in women with prolapse than in the general female population reveals a serious public health problem in South Kivu and by extension in the DRC.</p><p>This study is a pilot to motivate a larger national study and a basis for developing strategies to improve cervical cancer control in our country. These results also highlight the need to improve awareness of risk factors, including uterine prolapse.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rukunghu, N.N., Nyakio, O., Ilunga-Mbaya, E., Tchass, C.B., Madoli, K., Kakusu, D., Botalatala, J.B., Ntagereka, E.M. and Mukwege, D. (2023) Frequency of Cervix Dysplasia in Women with Prolapsed Uterus: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study at Panzi General Referral Hospital. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13, 1142-1150. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2023.137098</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126352-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS (2017) La lutte contre le cancer du col de l’utérus; Guide des pratiques essentielles. 2ème edition.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS: International Centre for Research on Cancer (2018) Dernières données mondiales sur le cancer: Le fardeau du cancer atteint 18.1 millions de nouveaux cas et 9.6 millions de décès par cancer en 2018. 8-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loizzi, V., Cormio, G., Selvaggi, L., et al. (2010) Cancer du col utérin localement avancé associated à un prolapsus utérin complet. European Journal of Cancer Care, 19, 548-550. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19694800</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangare, F.B. (2007) Etude des facteurs de risques des lésions dysplasiques et cancéreuses du col de l’utérus diagnostiquées. Thèse de Médecine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cabane, A.G. (2015) The Pelvic Fracture: Perspectives for the Gynaecological Examination from the Patient’s Point of View. Human Medicine and Pathology. 8-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali-Risasi, C., Verdonck, K., Padalko, E., Vanden Broeck, D., Praet, M., et al. (2015) Prevalence and Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer among Women Living in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Cross-Sectional Study. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 10, Article No. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-015-0015-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali-Risasi, C., Mulumba, P., Verdonck, K., Broeck, D.V. and Praet, M. (2014) Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices about Cervical Cancer among Women Living in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. BMC Women’s Health, 14, Article No. 30.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olivier, N., Fabrice, K., Albert, T., Prosper, K., Prosper, K. and Baptiste, K. (2021) Epidemiological and Cytopathological Profile of Dysplastic Lesions of the Cervix in South-Kivu/Dr Congo. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 11, 162-182.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.112018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cytopathologie du col utérin-atlas numérique/Système Bethesda 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yessaian, A., Mendivil, A.A. and Brewster, W.R. (2005) Population Characteristics in Studies of Cervical Cancer: The Search for External Validity. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 192, 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S&amp;#246;derlund-Strand, A., Eklund, C., Kemetli, L., Grillner, L., T&amp;#246;rnberg, S., Dillner, J., et al. (2011) Genotyping of Human Papillomavirus in Triaging Low-Grade Cervical Cytology. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 205, 145.e1-6.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Catarino, R., Vassilakos, P., Tebeu, P.M., Sch&amp;#228;fer, S., Bongoe, A. and Petignat, P. (2016) Risk Factors Associated with Human Papillomavirus Prevalence and Cervical Neoplasia in Cameroonian Women. Cancer Epidemiology, 40, 60-66.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordon, J.R., Barve, A., Chaudhari, V., Kosambiya, J.K., Kumar, A., Gamit, S., et al. (2019) “HIV Is Not an Easily Acceptable Disease”: The Role of HIV-Related Stigma in Obtaining Cervical Cancer Screening in India. Women Health, 59, 801-814.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tapera, O., Kadzatsa, W., Nyakabau, A.M., Mavhu, W., Dreyer, G., Stray-Pedersen, B., et al. (2019) Sociodemographic Inequalities in Cervical Cancer Screening, Treatment and Care among Women Aged 25 Years and over: Evidence from Surveys in Harare, Zimbabwe. BMC Public Health, 19, Article No. 428.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6749-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, J.Y., Wang, Z.L., Wang, Z.Y. and Yang, X.S. (2018) The Risk Factors of Residual Lesions and Recurrence of the High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL) Patients with Positive-Margin after Conization. Medicine (United States), 97, e12792. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012792</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eun, T.J. and Perkins, R.B. (2020) Screening for Cervical Cancer. Medical Clinics of North America, 104, 1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lansac, J., Lecomte, P. and Marret, H. (2014) Gynécologie pour le praticien. Elsevier Masson. 8ème édition. Elsevier M. Paris, 89-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shin, S.S., Carpenter, C.L., Ekstrand, M.L., Wang, Q., Grover, S., Zetola, N.M., et al. (2019) Cervical Cancer Awareness and Presence of Abnormal Cytology among HIV-Infected Women on Antiretroviral Therapy in Rural Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of STD &amp; AIDS, 30, 586-595.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462419825950</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126352-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Lyu, L., Hu, Q., Wan, Z., Dong, J., Pan, M. and Shen, W. (2017) A Proper Triage for Detecting Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes Other than HPV16/18. European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 219, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.10.021</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>