<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETSN</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9517</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/etsn.2023.121001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ETSN-126334</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Extent of Partograph Use and Associated Factors among Obstetric Care Providers in Government Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsedey</surname><given-names>Ayele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sebsibe</surname><given-names>Tadesse</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daniel</surname><given-names>Haile</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>National Data Management and Analytics Center for Health, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Southern Nations Nationalities and People’s Regional State Health Bureau, Hawassa, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Prolonged labor is a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization encourages using the partograph to keep track and solve this issue. The extent of partograph use in Ethiopia, however, is hardly understood. This study aimed to ascertain the level of partograph use and related variables among obstetric care providers in government hospitals in southern Ethiopia. 
  Methods: A cross-sectional institutional study was conducted among obstetric care providers in government hospitals in southern Ethiopia, from March to December 2015. The data were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire and format. To establish a statistical relationship, an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was utilized. 
  Results: A total of 212 (55.1%) obstetric providers reported routine use of partograph to monitor labor. Midwives [AOR: 3.4, 95% CI: (1.2, 9.4)], clinical nurses [AOR: 3.0, 95% CI: (1.1, 7.6)], knowledge of partographs [AOR: 2.0, 95% CI: (1.2, 3.5)], positive attitudes toward partograph use [AOR: 3.7, 95% CI: (1.7, 7.7)], service of 2 - 5 years [AOR: 3.4, 95% CI: (2.8, 4.4)] and service of more than five years [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: (2.0, 3.3)] were associated with partograph use. 
  Conclusion: This study has shown that the use of partographs to monitor labor among obstetricians is consistent with other studies from developing countries. However, this does not mean that obstetric care does not need to be strengthened, as a significant proportion of obstetricians still do not use the partograph for labor monitoring. Therefore, it is recommended that midwives and nurses be given preference in the delivery of obstetric services, the knowledge and attitudes of providers be improved, and mechanisms be developed that can help keep senior care providers.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Midwives</kwd><kwd> Nurses</kwd><kwd> Obstetric Care Providers</kwd><kwd> Partograph Utilization</kwd><kwd> Service Duration</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Background</title><p>A significant issue with reproductive health is maternal mortality. In 2020, there were projected to be 287,000 maternal fatalities worldwide, and every day, about 800 women died from conditions that could have been avoided during pregnancy and childbirth. Seventy percent of them originated in Sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref1">1</xref>] . In developing nations, prolonged labor is one of the leading causes of maternal and neonatal fatalities. Obstructed labor, dehydration, tiredness, uterine rupture, bleeding, and infections in the mother and the newborn can result from abnormally progressing labor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref2">2</xref>] . In response, in order to improve health outcomes and lower maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, the World Health Organization advises using a partograph to track labor and delivery. However, the partograph is rarely used as a tool for making decisions during delivery in many developing nations. Instead, it is used as a labor record to be completed after the baby is born. Furthermore, filling out the partograph is frequently seen by those who offer obstetric care as an additional time-consuming duty, and they hardly ever realize how life-saving it can be [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Although the Ethiopian government has committed to reducing maternal mortality, the rate is still 401 per 100,000 live births in 2020 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref5">5</xref>] . Numerous interventions have been devised to lower this unacceptable maternal death rate. The most crucial tactic for a short-term reduction in maternal mortality and morbidity in the nation has been recognized as skilled attendance during pregnancy, labor, and delivery. One element of competent care that prevents maternal mortality and problems due to obstructed or protracted labor is the use of partographs. The extent of partograph use in Ethiopia, however, is little understood [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref7">7</xref>] . The purpose of this study was to ascertain the level of partograph use and related variables among obstetric care providers in government hospitals in Ethiopia’s Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region. The findings could help improve obstetric care and reduce preventable maternal deaths.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design and Area</title><p>From March to December 2015, a cross-sectional institutional survey of obstetric care providers was conducted in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region of Ethiopia. Currently, the region is administratively divided into the Sidama, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’, and South West Ethiopia Peoples’ regions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Participants and Sample Size</title><p>All obstetric care providers working in the maternity wards of 15 randomly selected government hospitals in southern Ethiopia (out of 21) participated in the study. Staff who were unavailable during data collection were excluded from the study. Epi Info version 7 was used to determine the minimum sample size of 410 participants, based on an expected proportion of 40.2% of partograph use [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref7">7</xref>] , a margin of error of 5%, a confidence level of 95%, and a non-response rate of 10%.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection Tools and Procedures</title><p>A pretested interview questionnaire was used for data collection. The questionnaire included detailed information on sociodemographic characteristics, use of the partograph and reasons for not using it, and providers’ knowledge and attitudes toward the use of the partograph. In addition, 13 randomly selected charts were reviewed at each hospital using a pretested data collection format. Ten certified nurses and two certified midwives participated in the data collection.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Quality Control</title><p>Training of data collectors and supervisors included the data collection instrument, field methods, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and record keeping. The investigators coordinated the interview process, spot-checked, and reviewed the completed questionnaire daily to ensure the completeness and consistency of the data collected. The interview questionnaire and data collection format were pretested on obstetric care providers at a hospital not selected for this study to identify potential problem areas and unexpected interpretations. We changed the questionnaire based on the results of the pretest.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Management and Statistical Analyses</title><p>Data were entered and cleaned using Epi Info version 7 and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Frequency distributions and percentages were used for descriptive analyses. All independent variables were separately fitted to a bivariate logistic regression model to assess the association with partograph use, and a multivariable logistic regression model was also used to control for confounding factors. An odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to explain the statistical significance of the variables.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Operational Definitions</title><p>Partograph use: Obstetric care providers are reportedly using the partograph to routinely monitor labor.</p><p>Knowledgeable: Obstetric care providers who scored mean or higher on knowledge questions (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A1).</p><p>Favorable attitude: Obstetric care providers who scored mean or higher on attitude questions (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A2).</p><p>Obstetric care provider: A certified health care professional who cares for the woman during labor and delivery.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics</title><p>A total of 385 participants completed the questionnaire, representing a response rate of 93.9%. Of these, 65.7% were female. The majority, 72.5%, of participants belonged to the 20 - 29 age group. By profession, 44.7% were nurses, followed by 36.9% midwives (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Participants’ Years of Service and Their History of Training</title><p>Three-quarters, or 75.6%, of obstetric care providers, had served for over two years. More than half, 51.2%, received training in obstetrics and neonatal care (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Use of the Partograph</title><p>A total of 55.1% of obstetric providers reported routinely using the partograph to monitor labor. Use was also assessed by reviewing 195 charts at the hospitals studied. Partograph paperwork was included in 75% of the charts. Of these, 55% were completed to assess the progress of labor, and the remainder still needed to be completed. Nearly three-quarters of the completed papers were not properly filled out (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</label><caption><title> Sociodemographic characteristics of obstetric care providers at governmental hospitals in southern Ethiopia, from March to December 2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (in years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical doctor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health officer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clinical nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwives</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency surgery officer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</label><caption><title> Service duration and history of training on skilled delivery by obstetric care providers at governmental hospitals in southern Ethiopia, from March to December 2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Service duration (in years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Have you ever received training in obstetric care?</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</label><caption><title> Patterns of plotting on partograph papers at governmental hospitals in southern Ethiopia, from March to December 2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Components of partograph plotted</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fetal heartbeat plotted correctly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The membrane, intact or ruptured, is recorded</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cervix initial dilation plotted correctly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0 70.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cervical dilation plotted four hourly Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8 76.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The color of the liquor recorded Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2 73.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Descent plotted correctly Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5 77.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine contraction plotted correctly Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.2 68.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correctly plotted across the alert line Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8 76.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Reasons for Not Using the Partograph</title><p>Forty-five percent of obstetric care providers reported not routinely using the partograph to monitor labor. The most common reason for not using the partograph was the use of other tools, such as clinical notes, monitoring charts, and a piece of paper other than the partograph, for 28.1%; time constraints, for 27.1%; lack of staff, for 24.8%; and unavailability of the partograph, for 19.4% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Level of Knowledge and Attitude</title><p>In terms of knowledge about the partograph, 61.0% of care providers were knowledgeable. Almost all of them, namely 99.2%, learned about the partograph during their studies. More than half, 51.2%, received training on the partograph at work. The majority, 70.4%, had a positive attitude toward the use of the partograph.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Factors Associated with the Use of Partographs</title><p>In this study, the independent predictors of partograph use in the multivariable analysis are: midwife [AOR: 3.4, 95% CI: (1.2, 9.4)], clinical nurse [AOR: 3, 95% CI: (1.1, 7.6)], knowledge of partographs [AOR: 2, 95% CI: (1.2, 3.5)], a positive attitude toward partograph use [AOR: 3.7, 95% CI: (1.7, 7.7)], a service of 2 - 5 years [AOR: 3.4, 95% CI: (2.8, 4.4)], and a service of over 5 years [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: (2, 3.3)] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</label><caption><title> Bivariate and multivariable analyses of factors associated with partograph utilization at governmental hospitals in southern Ethiopia, from March to December 2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crude OR (95% CI)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adjusted OR (95% CI)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General practitioner Health officer Midwife Clinical nurse Emergency surgery officer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 1.7 (0.6, 6.7) 6.6 (2.1, 20.9) 4.9 (2.0, 5.3) 2.0 (0.8, 3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2.2 (0.6, 7.9) 3.4 (1.2, 9.4) 3.0 (1.1, 7.6) 9.2 (0.4, 34.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >On-job training</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2.5 (1.6, 3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 1.0 (0.4, 2.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledgeable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 1.2 (1.1, 2.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2.0 (1.2, 3.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Attitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unfavorable Favorable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 1.3 (1.2, 2.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 3.7 (1.7, 7.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Service duration (in years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;2 2 - 5 &gt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2.3 (1.4, 4.0) 1.2 (0.7, 1.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 3.4 (2.8, 4.4) 2.3 (2.0, 3.3)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Skilled labor management using a partograph, a simple instrument that provides a continuous pictorial overview of labor and alerts midwives and obstetricians to abnormalities in maternal or fetal well-being, is an important approach to preventing prolonged labor and its complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref9">9</xref>] . The aim of this study was to assess the extent of partograph use and associated factors among obstetric care providers in government hospitals in southern Ethiopia. The study found that partograph use was 55.1%. In addition, midwifery, clinical nursing, knowledge of partographs, a positive attitude towards partograph use, a service of 2 - 5 years, and a service of more than 5 years were significantly associated with partograph use.</p><p>Reportedly, 55.1% of obstetric care providers in government hospitals in southern Ethiopia use partographs. This is within the range of studies from Ethiopia (13% - 57%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref10">10</xref>] and Africa (30% - 98.8%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref11">11</xref>] . However, this does not mean that obstetric care does not need to be improved, as a significant proportion of staff still do not use the partograph to monitor labor. To encourage staff to use the partograph, interventions should include regular supportive supervision, partograph paper distribution, and training on obstetric care and partograph use [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref6">6</xref>] . The significance of prompt interventions during labor and delivery, as well as accurate documentation of these interventions, should also be emphasized. The use of the partograph may be hampered by underlying systemic problems, such as insufficient staffing or a shortage of necessary supplies, which must be addressed as well. In the end, better partograph use can result in better outcomes for mothers and babies, making it an essential part of high-quality obstetric care.</p><p>This study identified important predictors influencing partograph use. Midwives and nurses were about three times more likely to use the partograph than general practitioners. This is consistent with studies conducted in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref12">12</xref>] . This could be because midwives and clinical nurses had a greater chance of being trained in partograph use and were assigned to maternity wards because obstetric care is their primary role. However, it is important to note that partograph use should not be limited to just midwives and clinical nurses. All healthcare providers who are involved in the care of pregnant women should be trained in partograph use to ensure the best possible outcomes for both the mother and baby. In addition, it is crucial that healthcare facilities have adequate resources and support systems in place to enable the effective use of the partograph. This includes having enough staff available to monitor labor progress and respond to any complications that may arise, as well as having access to necessary medical equipment and supplies. By ensuring that all healthcare providers are trained in partograph use and that facilities have adequate resources, we can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes and reduce the risk of complications during childbirth.</p><p>In this study, good knowledge and a positive attitude were associated with the use of partographs among obstetric providers. Previous studies have confirmed this [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref10">10</xref>] . The reason could be that good knowledge and a positive attitude toward partograph use could increase staff motivation, enhance job satisfaction, and encourage them to use partographs. Therefore, intervention programs to promote high-quality obstetric care should aim to regularly assess knowledge, attitude, and practice of standard obstetric care, including partograph use, and provide on-the-job training [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Partographs were about three times more likely to be used by obstetric care providers with longer work experience than by those with less than one year of service. A possible explanation for this could be that those who had been in service longer had good knowledge and skills in obstetrics and were familiar with the partograph [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126334-ref10">10</xref>] . In addition, they may have participated in various safe deliveries that could help them understand the importance of using the partograph to monitor labor. It can be concluded that there is a need to retain senior professionals in government health facilities to provide quality obstetric care and reduce maternal and infant mortality associated with prolonged and obstructed labor. In addition, providing quality pre-service training with appropriate exposure and a conducive clinical practice environment should also be considered to equip young professionals with the necessary skills and knowledge to handle obstetric emergencies.</p><p>The implications of this study’s findings for clinical practice and public health decision-making are significant. The use of partographs can lead to earlier detection of labor complications, allowing for timely interventions and potentially reducing the need for emergency obstetric care. This can ultimately improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes, especially in low-resource settings where access to emergency care may be limited. Additionally, incorporating partograph use into standard labor monitoring protocols can help ensure consistent and high-quality care across healthcare providers. However, it is important to recognize that simply providing education and training on partograph use may not be enough to ensure its widespread adoption. Addressing systemic barriers such as inadequate staffing or a lack of necessary equipment must also be prioritized in order to fully realize the potential benefits of this tool. Overall, this study underscores the importance of evidence-based approaches to improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes and highlights the need for continued investment in healthcare worker education and training programs.</p><p>However, it is important to keep in mind the limitations of the study when interpreting the findings. In self-report studies like this one, social desirability might pose a problem since participants might provide more socially desirable answers than they actually do. Furthermore, no cause-and-effect link between the independent factors and the usage of partographs was found due to the study’s cross-sectional design. The use of partographs in labor monitoring may be impacted by other factors, such as cultural beliefs and attitudes about birthing, which require further study. A further limitation on the generalizability of the results to other contexts may be that the study only included healthcare professionals from government hospitals in southern Ethiopia. Future studies should aim to include a more diverse sample of healthcare workers from multiple hospitals and regions to better understand the factors that influence partograph use.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study has shown that the use of partographs to monitor labor among obstetric care providers is consistent with other studies from developing countries. However, this does not mean that obstetric care does not need to be improved, as a significant proportion of care providers still do not use the partograph for labor monitoring. Therefore, it is recommended that preference be given to midwives and nurses in the delivery of obstetric services, the knowledge and attitudes of providers be improved, and mechanisms be developed to help retain experienced providers.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Authors’ Contribution</title><p>T.A., S.T., and D.H. are involved in conceptualization, data analysis, and interpretation. S.T. and D.H. supervised and provided mentorship. S.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors wish to thank the southern region hospitals’ administration offices for administrative support and the data collectors for their support in making this study possible. They also extend their deepest gratitude to the study participants.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Ethical Approval</title><p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board of the University of Gondar via the Institute of Public Health. Informed verbal consent was obtained from the study participants.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Funding</title><p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Data Availability Statement</title><p>All relevant data are within the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ayele, T., Tadesse, S. and Haile, D. (2023) The Extent of Partograph Use and Associated Factors among Obstetric Care Providers in Government Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/etsn.2023.121001</p></sec><sec id="s13"><title>Appendix</title><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A1</label><caption><title> Knowledge-related questions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Questions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Response</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you think that, monitoring labor by partograph is important to prevent obstructed labor and its sequelae?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >302</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >For you, the partograph may be defined as:</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >302.1 A chart for monitoring of labor by doctors.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >302.2 A complex tool with pictorial overview of labor for the use by midwives.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302.3 A simple graphic recording of progress of labor and conditions of mother and fetus against time in hours.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The following diagnosis/assessment can be made with the partograph.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Fetal well-being 2. Maternal well-being 3. Progression of the labor 4. Medication used during labor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you think the partograph will reduce maternal and newborn death?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you think that, cervical dilation should be plotted on partograph every 1 hour?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you think that, maternal blood pressure should be plotted on partograph at least every 4 hrs?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you think that partograph should be used for all laboring mother?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In a normal progress of labor, the graph/plot on the partograph should fall on the alert line.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In a normal progress of labor, the graph/plot on Partograph should fall on the left of alert line.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Yes 2. No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In your practice, you usually enter information onto the partograph?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Upon diagnosis of labor 2. While the woman is still in labor 3. After delivery of the baby</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A2</label><caption><title> Attitude-related questions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Questions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Response</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >401</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph usage can reduce maternal and new born deaths.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph can be used to diagnosis prolonged labor.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph is necessary to improve quality of care.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph is a simple graphic recording of progress of labor.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph is relevant to prevent obstructed labor.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph is a chart for monitoring labor by doctors.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph is a complex tool with pictorial overview of labor.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >408</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partograph is developed for midwives to monitor labor.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >409</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Action line of partograph plot falls on the left of alert line.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In normal progress of labor, plot on the partograph falls on the left of alert line.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Undecided 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126334-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2020) Maternal Mortality. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yeshitila, Y.G., Daniel, B., Desta, M. and Kassa, G.M. (2022) Obstructed Labor and Its Effect on Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 17, e0275400.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275400</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fawole, A., Adekanle, D. and Hunyinbo, K. (2010) Utilization of the Partograph in Primary Health Care Facilities in Southwestern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 13, 200-204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orji, E. (2008) Evaluating Progress of Labor in Nulliparas and Multiparas Using the Modified World Health Organization Partograph. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 102, 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.04.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Federal Ministry of Health (2020) Health Sector Transformation Plan 2020-2025. Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yisma, E., Dessalegn, B., Astatkie, A. and Fesseha, N. (2013) Knowledge and Utilization of Partograph among Obstetric Caregivers in Public Health Institutions of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13, Article No. 17.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wakgari, N., Amano, A., Berta, M. and Tessema, G.A. (2015) Partograph Utilization and Associated Factors among Obstetric Care Providers in North Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. African Health Sciences, 15, 552-559.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v15i2.30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathibe, N., Lebeko, F. and Motupa, B. (2013) The Partograph: A Labor Management Tool or a Midwifery Record? International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 5, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJNM2013.0115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitila, S., Gmariam, A., Molla, A. and Nemera, G. (2014) Utilization of Partograph during Labor and Birth Outcomes at Jimma University. Journal of Pregnancy and Child Health, 1, Article ID: 1000101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abebe, F., Birhanu, D., Awoke, W. and Ejigu, T. (2013) Assessment of Knowledge and Utilization of the Partograph among Health Professionals in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2, 26-42.  
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20130202.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogwang, S., Karyabakabo, Z. and Rutebemberwa, E. (2009) Assessment of Partogram Use during Labor in Bujumbura Health Subdistrict, Rukungiri District, Uganda. African Health Sciences, 9, S27-S34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Getachew, A., Ricca, J., Cantor, D., Rawlins, B., Rosen, H., Tekleberhan, A., et al. (2011) Quality of Care for Prevention and Management of Common Maternal and Newborn Complications: A Study of Ethiopia’s Hospitals. Maternal and Child Health Integration Program and Jhpiego, Baltimore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wamwana, E., Ndavi, P., Gichangi, P., Karanja, J., Muia, E. and Jaldesa, G. (2007) Quality of Record Keeping in the Intrapartum Period at the Provincial General Hospital, Kakamega, Kenya. East African Medical Journal, 84, 16-23.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v84i1.9486</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126334-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adesola, O., Omolola, I., Adekemi, O. and Audu, O. (2014) Partograph Utilization at Three Levels of Health Care Delivery Services in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7, 678-691.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>