<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAnes</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Anesthesiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5531</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojanes.2023.137013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAnes-126296</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Liposomal Bupivacaine in Erector Spinae Plane Block and Interscalene Block for Scapular and Proximal Humerus Resections
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamad</surname><given-names>Ayoub</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sree</surname><given-names>Kolli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Husien</surname><given-names>Taleb</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>139</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block that was first described in 2016. It is considered an alternative for brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgeries as the erector spinae muscle extends to the cervical level. Herein, we present a successful multilevel ESPB plus an interscalene block using liposomal bupivacaine in a 45-year-old female patient with metastatic sarcoma who presented for scapula and proximal humerus resection. The post-operative course was smooth, and the patient was discharged home on post-operative day 2 with minimal narcotic requirements.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Acute Pain</kwd><kwd> Erector Spinae Plane Block</kwd><kwd> Phrenic Nerve</kwd><kwd> Liposomal Bupivacaine—Regional Anesthesia</kwd><kwd> Spindle Cell Sarcoma</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), first described in 2016, is a novel fascial plane block [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref1">1</xref>] . This block gained popularity in multiple procedures, including spinal, thoracic, and abdominal surgeries. ESPB is performed either as a single shot block or catheter placement with continuous infusion if a prolonged block is desired. Local anesthetic volume and concentration are essential factors while performing ESPB, commonly with volumes between 10 to 40 ml [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref2">2</xref>] . Moreover, ESPB is considered an alternative for brachial plexus blocks in shoulder surgeries as the erector spinae muscle extends to the cervical level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref3">3</xref>] . The ESP block functions by the spreading of local anesthetic into the paravertebral spaces, causing a blockage of the dorsal and ventral ramus of spinal nerves, along with potential spread through the transforaminal and epidural routes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref4">4</xref>] . The injected anesthetic mixture can cover as many as 4 - 8 vertebral levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref5">5</xref>] . We present a case of a successful multilevel ESPB plus interscalene block using liposomal bupivacaine in a patient with metastatic sarcoma who presented for resection of the scapula and proximal humerus.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Case Report</title><p>A 45-year-old female patient with a history of undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma of the anterior mediastinum status post-resection presented with a painful metastatic lesion to the right scapula. She underwent chemotherapy and cryoablation, which was unsuccessful in curing this lesion. Her case was discussed during the tumor board with a decision for scapulectomy and modified Tikhoff-Linberg reconstruction to control the local spread.</p><p>Acute pain management was consulted for pre-operative peripheral nerve block placement. The acute pain and surgical teams agreed that a single shot block with liposomal bupivacaine was the best pre-operative method for the patient, because the ESP catheter would be in the surgical field with difficulty placing it post-operatively without removing the dressing pre-operatively. The patient agreed to receive multilevel ESPB with interscalene brachial plexus block using liposomal bupivacaine. The patient was placed in a sitting position and her back was prepped with chlorhexidine. Using a low-frequency, curvilinear ultrasound transducer in a longitudinal orientation, the T4 spinous process was identified. The ultrasound probe was moved laterally to identify the trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae superficial to the transverse process. A 20G-10 cm echogenic needle was inserted in-plane under ultrasound guidance in a caudad-to-cephalad direction until it touched the transverse process. After negative aspiration, 13 ml of 1.3% Liposomal Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine mixture was injected under ultrasound visualization in the erector spinae plane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The same technique was used again at the level of T5 and T6 spinous processes using 13 ml of the anesthetic mixture at each level. Multilevel (T4, T5, T6) ESPB was done because the patient was obese and we wanted to make sure that all the local anesthetic was injected under the erector spinae muscle and spread evenly along the 3 spaces (T4, T5, T6) in the ESPB to not waste some of the medication intramuscularly.</p><p>For the interscalene block, the patient was positioned in a supine position with her head rotated towards the contralateral side. Using a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer, we identified the anterior and middle scalene muscles with the brachial plexus between them. Using a 20G-10 cm echogenic needle, 10 ml of 1.3% Liposomal Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine mixture were injected around the plexus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The patient underwent a right extra-articular scapulectomy with modified Tikhoff-Linberg reconstruction under general anesthesia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). She received 175 mcg of fentanyl intraoperatively. The patient was extubated and discharged to the recovery room. Her pain was well controlled post-operatively. During her hospital stay, she started physical therapy and remained comfortable with very well-tolerated pain controlled on only low-dose opiates (oxycodone) and acetaminophen until her discharge day. During her hospital stay, the patient didn’t complain of any side effects from the block or shortness of breath. We didn’t notice any change in her sensory or motor function during her stay.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>The use of ESPB for thoracic, shoulder and back surgeries has been recently expanding. This block shows a safer profile compared to neuraxial blocks, especially regarding hemodynamic stability, spinal cord injury, epidural hematoma, and lung injury [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref6">6</xref>] . Moreover, it is considered an easier block compared to the thoracic epidural and paravertebral block and can reduce the amount of opioid consumption perioperatively. In this case, we decided to add liposomal bupivacaine to the anesthetic mixture to prolong the duration of action. Its use showed reductions in narcotic consumption, better pain control, and a decrease in the length of stay when used in transversus abdominis plane block [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref7">7</xref>] . As ESPB is another fascial plane block, we believe that the use of liposomal bupivacaine might be a good option to provide prolonged pain relief, especially in surgeries that involve multiple body compartments. In our patient, the surgical incision involved the back, shoulder, and upper arm. For that, we did multilevel ESPB (at T4, T5, and T6) to cover the scapular dermatomal levels. In addition, we believed that the spread of the mixture under the erector spinae muscle would target the cervical dermatomes supplying the upper arm and shoulder. We also did a single-shot interscalene block in order to ensure brachial plexus blockade. Performing the ESP block offers several key benefits. One advantage is that it can be easily executed, whether in the sitting or lateral position. Additionally, the block can be safely performed in patients who are receiving anticoagulation therapy, especially at the thoracic level. The patient was comfortable with her pain level and was discharged on post-operative day 2. Her use of narcotics was minimal, and she didn’t require any additional procedural or medical intervention to control her pain.</p><p>Complications from ESPB are very rare, especially at the thoracic level, because it is more superficial as compared to the ESPB at the lumbar level. The injection site is a bit away from major structures like pleura, spinal cord and major blood vessels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126296-ref1">1</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine is a promising analgesic technique that can be easily used in multiple surgical procedures. Our experience showed that it can be used for scapular and upper arm surgeries. Identifying the proper anesthetic dosing and the spread level will help expand the use of this block.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ayoub, M., Kolli, S. and Taleb, H. (2023) Liposomal Bupivacaine in Erector Spinae Plane Block and Interscalene Block for Scapular and Proximal Humerus Resections. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 13, 135-139. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2023.137013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126296-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Krishnan, S. and Cascella, M. (2022) Erector Spinae Plane Block. In: StatPearls, Ed., Treasure Island, StatPearls Publishing, Tampa, FL.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126296-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdella, A.M.M.R., Arida, E.E.A.E.M., Megahed, N.A., El-Amrawy, W.Z. and Mohamed, W.M.A. (2022) Analgesia and Spread of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 22, Article No. 321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126296-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, D.X., Wang, R., Wen, H., Li, H.L. and Jiang, J. (2021) Cervical Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Perioperative Analgesia Method for Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Case Series. Journal of Anesthesia, 35, 446-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-021-02907-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126296-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwartzmann, A., Peng, P., Maciel, M.A. and Forero, M. (2018) Mechanism of the Erector Spinae Plane Block: Insights from a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien d’Anesthésie, 65, 1165-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1187-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126296-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adhikary, S.D., Pruett, A., Forero, M. and Thiruvenkatarajan, V. (2018) Erector Spinae Plane Block as an Alternative to Epidural Analgesia for Post-Operative Analgesia following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Study and a Literature Review on the Spread of Local Anaesthetic in the Erector Spinae Plane. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 62, 75-78. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_693_17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126296-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oezel, L., Hughes, A.P., Onyekwere, I., Wang, Z., Arzani, A., Okano, I., Zhu, J., Sama, A.A., Cammisa, F.P., Girardi, F. and Soffin, E.M. (2022) Procedure-Specific Complications Associated with Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 342 Consecutive Cases. Journal of Pain Research, 15, 655-661. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S354111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126296-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fayezizadeh, M., Majumder, A., Neupane, R., Elliott, H.L. and Novitsky, Y.W. (2016) Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine during Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. The American Journal of Surgery, 212, 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.12.026</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>