<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2023.117007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-126295</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Safety Evaluation of the Dichloromethane Extract of &lt;i&gt;Hysterionica pinifolia&lt;/i&gt;: A Potential Raw Material for the Development of Biopesticides
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ingrid</surname><given-names>M. Cufre</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adriana</surname><given-names>M. Broussalis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Susana</surname><given-names>B. Gorzalczany</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>CONICET, Instituto de la Química y Metabolismo del Fármaco (IQUIMEFA), Buenos Aires, Argentina</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>78</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  At the moment, there is a growing concern about the negative effects on human health and the environment due to the widespread and indiscriminate use of conventional insecticides. Since plants have been used throughout history to control microorganisms and insects, the safety is an aspect that must also be evaluated to guarantee that its use does not affect human health and the environment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the dichloromethane extract of 
  <em>Hysterionica pinifolia</em>, species with insecticidal activity, to be employed as a raw material for the development of biopesticides. The acute and subacute toxicity and the dermal and ocular irritation were evaluated. In these studies, the dichloromethane extract of 
  <em>H. pinifolia</em> showed no ocular and a slight dermal irritation. Oral acute toxicity was greater than 2000 mg/Kg and less than 5000 mg/Kg (slightly hazardous) and no signs of toxicity were observed at repeated doses of 100 mg/kg body weight. These promising results showed that 
  <em>Hysterionica pinifolia </em>could be considered as a potential raw material for the development of an insecticide from natural sources, safe for human health and the environment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Hysterionica pinifolia&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Oral Acute Toxicity</kwd><kwd> Dermal Irritation</kwd><kwd> Ocular Irritation</kwd><kwd> Repeated Dose Toxicity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>There is growing concern about the negative effects on human health, environment and non-target organisms due to the widespread and indiscriminate use of conventional insecticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref1">1</xref>] . For example, certain insecticides have negative effects on the nervous, renal, respiratory, and reproductive systems of men and women. Epidemiological studies have shown the association between exposure to pesticides and the risk and incidence of cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref5">5</xref>] . In addition to the detrimental impact of synthetic insecticides on human health, their excessive or inappropriate use is also linked to contamination of water, soil, and air, resistance of some pests to pesticides, and the reduction of biodiversity, among other factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref7">7</xref>] . The potential adverse effects associated with the use of chemical pesticides have also stimulated the research of new alternatives of pesticides from natural sources. In this sense, plants are a safe and efficient source of compounds with less toxicity for mammals, low persistence in the environment, and biodegradability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref9">9</xref>] . Currently, several studies have confirmed many of the beneficial biological activities attributed to them, such as insecticide, fungicide and repellent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref13">13</xref>] . However, the potential toxic or deleterious effects that their use could induce in short, medium or long term in human health and environment must be evaluated taking into account the potential routes of exposure for human beings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Hysterionica pinifolia (Poir.) Baker (Asteraceae) is a perennial subshrub, native to the Argentinian flora. It grows in hilly areas of the province of Buenos Aires, between 0 and 800 meters above of sea level and in other South American countries such as Brazil and Uruguay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref15">15</xref>] . In previous work the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> (dichloromethane) extract of this species showed insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum, a stored grain pest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref16">16</xref>] . Regarding the chemical composition of H. pinifolia, acetylenic compounds were reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref17">17</xref>] . Cis lachnophyllum methyl ester and the acetylenic alcohol (E)-undec-3-en-5,7-diyne-1-ol were identified as the major compounds in the active CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Polyacetylenes are widely distributed among Asteraceae, Araliaceae, and Umbelliferae families [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref18">18</xref>] . Some of the polyacetylenes isolated from food plants such as carrots, celery and parsley have various biological activities, like anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal and anticancer. According to their chemical structures, other polyacetylene compounds have shown toxic effects on humans and animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref19">19</xref>] . Some of these polyacetylenes are potent skin sensitizers and have shown cytotoxic and neurotoxic activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>Considering the presence of compounds with possible toxic effects in the active CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract from H. pinifolia, the development of a new insecticidal formulation using this extract as raw material requires a study of its safety.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material</title><p>Aerial parts of Hysterionica pinifolia were collected in Tandil, Buenos Aires province (west 59.1369, south 37.3286), Argentina, in March 2016 and was authenticated by Dr. Gustavo Giberti. A voucher specimen (BAF 858) was deposited in the Museum of Pharmacobotany of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The material was dried at room temperature and finely powdered.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Extraction</title><p>The powered aerial parts (100 g) were extracted at room temperature by maceration using CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> (1000 ml) for 1 h under continuous shaking. This procedure was repeated 5 times changing the solvent each time. These extracts were gathered. After evaporation of the solvent, 4.6 g of CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract was obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Animals</title><p>Healthy New Zealand rabbits and female and male Swiss mice and Wistar rats were used, following international guidelines and local regulations concerning to the care and use of laboratory animals for biomedical research (NIH Publication N˚ 85-23, Revised 1985). The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires (Ethics approval: Exp-FFyB 0077054/17). The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions for 7 days. Rats and rabbits were housed in groups of five and individually, respectively. Animals were maintained in standard conditions (21˚C &#177; 2˚C; 12 h light/dark cycle). The animals were fed with a standard diet and tap water ad libitum.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Rabbit Skin Irritation Test</title><p>The test was carried out based on OECD guideline No. 404 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref23">23</xref>] with slight modification. Approximately 24 h before the test, fur of the dorsal area of three rabbits was removed. 0.5 g of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract was applied uniformly on area of 6 cm<sup>2</sup> of intact and abraded skin and covered with a gauze patch. Rabbits were examined for signs of erythema and oedema and the responses scored at 24, 48 and 72 h, and 15<sup>th</sup> day thereafter.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Rabbit Eye Irritation Test</title><p>The test was carried out by employing OECD guideline No. 405 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref24">24</xref>] . Eye irritation was evaluated in 3 rabbits. Each one was instilled with 0.1 mL of the extract solution in the conjunctival sac of the right eye and the eyelid was immediately closed gently for a few seconds. The left eye was used as a control. The CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract was evaluated at a concentration of 0.5 g/5mL dissolved in corn oil. The effect of the instilled sample on cornea (degree of opacity and area involved), iris and conjunctiva (redness, edema and secretions) were evaluated. Observations were made at 1, 24, 48, 72, 96 h and 7 days after the application of the sample. With the results obtained, the ocular irritation index was calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Acute Toxicity in Mice</title><p>The evaluation of acute toxicity was carried out following the general guidelines of OECD No. 420 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref25">25</xref>] modified. Thirty mice, 15 males and 15 females, were randomly distributed into three groups of 10 animals each (5 males and 5 females). The CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract was administered as an oral dose of 2000 or 5000 mg/kg body weight dissolved in corn oil. The control group for both sexes (5 males and 5 females) received corn oil. The administration was carried out by gastric tube. Mice were fasted for 4 h prior to dosing the extract. Mortality and any signs of toxicity were monitored twice a day (in particular, during the first 30 minutes and up to 4 h after administration) for 14 days. During this period, the body weight was recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Repeated Dose Toxicity in Rats</title><p>The study was conducted following OECD guidelines 407 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref26">26</xref>] . Thirty rats (15 male and 15 female) were randomly divided into three groups of 10 animals each (5 males and 5 females). The CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract, dissolved in corn oil, was orally administered once a day at 100 mg/kg body weight to the treatment group for 35 days, while the control group received corn oil. The animals were observed for any signs of toxicity throughout the experimental period. Feed consumption, body weight and behavior were measured daily.</p><p>At the end of the experiment, the animals were weighed. Blood samples were collected for haematological study and for clinical biochemistry determinations. Haematological parameters were evaluated such as red blood cells, hemoglobin, hematocrit, total leukocytes and platelets. Glucose, total cholesterol, creatinine, uremia, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (GOT), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GTP), alkalinephosphatase (AP) were also evaluated.</p><p>A gross necropsy observation was carried out to find the presence of lesions on the external surface of the body, skeletal systems, body cavities (such as cranial, thoracic, abdominal and pelvic), as well as all orifices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref27">27</xref>] . Liver, kidney, spleen, heart and ovary/testicles were excised free of fat and observed for gross pathological changes. The organ weights were recorded.</p><p>Histological studies of liver, kidneys, heart and spleen taken from all animals of each group were performed. They were fixed in 10% formalin in phosphate buffer, dehydrated in ethanol and finally embedded in paraffin wax. Histological sections of 5 μm thickness were obtained and subsequently stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and were viewed under light microscope at 4&#215;, 10&#215; and 40&#215; (Carl Zeiss Axioskop 2 Plus).</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The results were expressed as the mean &#177; standard error of the mean (SEM). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed followed by the Dunnet test. p &lt; 0.05 was considered a significant difference.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Rabbit Skin Irritation Test</title><p>The skin’s rabbit showed very slight erythema, but a reversion of this effect was observed in two rabbits within 48 h. Oedema, alopecia, hyperkeratosis and hyperplasia were not observed on normal or injured skin in any animals.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Rabbit Eye Irritation Test</title><p>No ulceration, hemorrhage, opacity, swelling, tearing, oedema, redness and secretions were observed in the cornea, iris and conjunctiva during the observation period after instillation of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia. The response to the light stimulus was not altered compared to the control eyes. The assigned score was zero, therefore the extract can be classified as non-irritating.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Oral Acute Toxicity in Mice</title><p>Although acute toxicity test revealed that oral administration of a single dose of 5000 mg/kg induced 80% mortality, dose of 2000 mg/Kg of the extract did not show any signs of toxicity or deaths during the 14-day observation period. No significant changes in body weight were observed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The necropsy showed no macroscopic alterations in the liver, kidney, spleen and heart and no significant difference in the organ weight compared with control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). These results showed that lethal dose 50 (LD<sub>50</sub>) is greater than 2000 mg/kg and less than 5000 mg/kg of body weight.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Acute toxicity of oral administration of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia on body and organs weights on female and male mice</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia 2000 mg/kg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control (corn oil)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.28 &#177; 0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.18 &#177; 0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.2 &#177; 1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.82 &#177; 1.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.328 &#177; 0.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.371 &#177; 0.079</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spleen (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.3 &#177; 6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.42 &#177; 4.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kidney (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405.9 &#177; 14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.5 &#177; 19.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.4 &#177; 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >161.8 &#177; 11.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.14 &#177; 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.56 &#177; 0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.42 &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.16 &#177; 1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.193 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.073 &#177; 0.089</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spleen (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.8 &#177; 6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.0 &#177; 8.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kidney (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311.1 &#177; 8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310.9 &#177; 10.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173.1 &#177; 18.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193.5 &#177; 17.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values expressed as mean &#177; SEM (n = 5 per group). No significant differences were observed with respect to the control group at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Oral Repeated Dose Toxicity in Rats</title><p>The administration of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia did not produce adverse effects in rats in the repeated dose safety evaluation test. During the evaluated period (35 days), body weight changes were comparable between treatment and control group. The consumption of food and water were similar between the rats that received the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia (100 mg/Kg/day) and the control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Furthermore, the extract did not produce behavioral changes or any other sign of toxicity at the evaluated dose (100 mg/Kg/day). In the macroscopic observations made in the autopsy, no visibly relevant differences were found in the main organs evaluated, no significant changes in organ weight (liver, heart, spleen, kidneys, ovaries or testicles) between the animals treated with the extract and the control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). All the analyzed organs showed similar macroscopic and microscopic characteristics. Treatment with the extract did not induce significant changes in biochemical and hematological parameters, except in the group of males treated with the extract that presented a low value of hemoglobin and a low level of urea compared to the control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Histological study</p><p>Histological examinations of the liver, kidney, spleen and heart of the group of</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Body and organs weights of the rats treated orally with the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia for 35 days</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia 100 mg/kg/day</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control (corn oil)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282.0 &#177; 7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300.0 &#177; 8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >379.0 &#177; 16.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389.2 &#177; 6.094</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.93 &#177; 0.6302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.90 &#177; 0.2910</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spleen (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6977 &#177; 0.03620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6696 &#177; 0.02602</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kidney (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.983 &#177; 0.1436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.779 &#177; 0.07524</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.379 &#177; 0.06155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.466 &#177; 0.06766</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Testicles (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.400 &#177; 0.1612</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.469 &#177; 0.07481</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177.4 &#177; 3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.3 &#177; 3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final body weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.6 &#177; 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230.0 &#177; 3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.917 &#177; 0.2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.876 &#177; 0.6523</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spleen (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5467 &#177; 0.04816</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5067 &#177; 0.01746</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kidney (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.938 &#177; 0.08555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.798 &#177; 0.03302</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9789 &#177; 0.02448</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9715 &#177; 0.02246</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovaries (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1010 &#177; 0.198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1086 &#177; 0.01054</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values expressed as mean &#177; SEM (n = 5 per group). No significant differences were observed with respect to the control group at p &lt; 0.05.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Biochemical and haematological parameters of the rats treated orally with the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia for 35 days</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia 100 mg/kg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control (corn oil)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cholesterol (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.80 &#177; 2.311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.20 &#177; 1.655</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blood glucose (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.4 &#177; 1.600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.6 &#177; 1.990</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Creatinine (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3960 &#177; 0.009274</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4780 &#177; 0.04684</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uremia (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.20* &#177; 1.114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.60 &#177; 3.709</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT (UI/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >304.8 &#177; 125.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >268.8 &#177; 22.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GTP (UI/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.4 &#177; 58.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.60 &#177; 3.829</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AP (UI/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.8 &#177; 11.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.2 &#177; 11.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red blood cells (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8,892,000 &#177; 192,760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9,280,000 &#177; 579,215</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leukocytes (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8966 &#177; 835.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8096 &#177; 469.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemoglobin (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.46*&#177; 0.1364</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.44 &#177; 0.4020</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematocrit (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.60 &#177; 0.4000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.40 &#177; 1.435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Platelets (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >778,400 &#177; 79,244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >929,800 &#177; 92,341</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cholesterol (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.20 &#177; 1.908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.80 &#177; 3.541</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blood glucose (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.0 &#177; 3.450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.2 &#177; 3.917</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Creatinine (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4480 &#177; 0.01625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4540 &#177; 0.01661</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uremia (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.00 &#177; 1.483</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.20 &#177; 1.772</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT (UI/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.2 &#177; 13.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.4 &#177; 11.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GTP (UI/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.20 &#177; 1.463</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.00 &#177; 2.302</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AP (UI/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.00 &#177; 2.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.40 &#177; 8.964</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red blood cells (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8,400,000 &#177; 143,324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8,110,000 &#177; 245,398</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leukocytes (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8636 &#177; 1063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6934 &#177; 953.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemoglobin (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.48 &#177; 0.1594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.62 &#177; 0.3105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematocrit (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.26 &#177; 0.3742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.00 &#177; 1.095</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Platelets (mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >741,800 &#177; 73,480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >976,600 &#177; 143,192</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values expressed as mean &#177; SEM (n = 5 per group). *Significant difference compared to the control group at p &lt; 0.05.</p><p>rats that received CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia (100 mg/Kg/day) showed histostructure similar to control group. Pathological changes were not observed in any group. No evidence of necrosis and inflammation were observed in any group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The principal aim of evaluating the safety of any medicinal plant is to identify the nature and significance of adverse effect and to establish the exposure level at which this effect is observed. In the search for safe insecticides for human health and the environment, H pinifolia was studied. In previous work, the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of this species has demonstrated promising insecticidal activity and acetylenic compounds were identified [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref16">16</xref>] . The purpose of evaluating safety is not only to identify a potential adverse effect but also the significance of this effect. Considering the lack of toxicity reports of this species and the compounds identified in it, the safety profile of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract must be studied in order to develop a safety insecticidal formulation. In this sense, dermal and ocular irritation, oral acute toxicity and repeated dose safety were evaluated.</p><p>Skin and eyes are high risk of exposure to insecticides during their manufacture but also in their use. The hazards may be meaningful not only in case of a single accidental exposure but also in many short and smaller exposures during a continued period of time, so information related to potential skin and eye irritation is a fundamental part to identify the potential risk of the products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref28">28</xref>] . In this sense, it is important to determine if a substance or formulation for insecticide use could induce skin and eye irritation to be properly classified and labeled as recommended by Good Agricultural Practices and, if it is necessary, guarantee the appropriate use of personal protective equipment (protective glasses, face shields) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>In the study of primary dermal irritation, the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia presented a slight dermal irritation with barely perceptible erythema formation and no edema formation. Due to the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia did not produce corrosion or severe skin irritation, eye irritation was evaluated, showing that the extract did not produce signs of irritation during observation period.</p><p>Besides considering that exposure could occur when toxic substances get into de body through mouth, the oral route represents a potential route of accidental human exposure. Therefore, the determination of acute and repeated dose toxicity allows the hazard classification of test substances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref31">31</xref>] . In this sense, acute oral toxicity was determined for the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia at 5000 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg. The initial dose (5000 mg/kg) was selected adopting the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref32">32</xref>] for the toxicological classification of pesticides according to risk and LD<sub>50</sub>. In this investigation, the acute oral toxicity of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia was greater than 2000 mg/Kg and less than 5000 mg/Kg. Therefore, according to the WHO toxicological classification (2019), it is considered slightly hazardous (Category III).</p><p>The toxic effects observed in the acute oral toxicity at the concentration of 5000 mg/Kg and the slight dermal irritation could be attributed to the presence of acetylenic compounds in the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract. In this sense, cis lachnophyllum methyl ester and the acetylenic alcohol (E)-undec-3-en-5,7-diyne-1-ol, were identified as major compounds in the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref16">16</xref>] . Although there are no reports of toxicity of these identified acetylenes, other compounds with analogous structure showed acute toxic effects, contact dermatitis and irritant skin reactions for humans and animals. For example, cicutoxin and oeantotoxin isolated from Cicuta virosa L. (Apiaceae) and Oenanthe crocata L. (Apiaceae) respectively, showed acute toxic effects in humans and domestic animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref22">22</xref>] ; the acetylenic alcohol falcarinol is responsible for most allergic skin reactions caused by plants of the Apiaceae and Araliaceae families, while structurally related polyacetylenes such as falcarindiol and falcarinone had no irritating effect on the skin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>In view of repeated exposure, toxicological evaluations are vital to characterize the toxicological profile of xenobiotics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref33">33</xref>] . In this work, the analyzed parameters showed promising results.</p><p>Changes in body weight as well as organ weight have been used as an indicator of potential adverse effects of chemical compounds, such as tubular hypertrophy, progressive nephropathy or hepatocellular hypertrophy related to changes in kidney or liver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref35">35</xref>] . The administration of repeated doses of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia did not produce changes in the body weight of the animals, neither in the weight of the organs evaluated.</p><p>Histopathological analysis of organs and tissues represents a way to evaluate possible pathological changes related to the administration of repeated doses of a certain substance. The observation of cellular structures allows to determine pathological alterations with greater precision [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref33">33</xref>] . In the studied organs, a normal cellular morphology was observed, without evidence of necrosis and inflammation between the groups that received daily the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia compared to the corresponding control groups.</p><p>On the other hand, considering that level of glucose and lipids can detect alterations in the metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref36">36</xref>] , these parameters were measured. The values of blood glucose and cholesterol did not present significant differences between the treated and control groups.</p><p>Creatinine, uremia, GOT, GTP and AP are used as biomarkers of renal or hepatic injuries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref33">33</xref>] . In this study, no statistical differences in biochemical parameters were observed between the treated and control groups. Only, uremia in males treated with the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract showed a statistically significant decrease compared to the control group, nevertheless the observed level of uremia (29.20 &#177; 1.114 mg/dL) lacks biological significance since it is not below 20 mg/dL, a value that indicates hypo-azotemia.</p><p>Also, changes in hematological parameters have been used to predict toxic effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref37">37</xref>] but the administration of repeated doses of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia did not affect the evaluated hematological parameters.</p><p>The results obtained in the repeated dose safety test in rats, showed that the administration of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia did not produce significant adverse effects. The employed dose (100 mg/kg/day) is six times greater than the EC<sub>50</sub> of the extract obtained in the insecticide activity bioassay on T. castaneum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126295-ref16">16</xref>] . Therefore, it could be expected that the use of the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia at the EC<sub>50</sub> dose would be safe for human health.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>In this study, the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia presented a slight dermal irritation, no ocular irritation, dose of acute oral toxicity is between 2000 mg/Kg 5000 mg/Kg (slightly hazardous) and no signs of toxicity at repeated doses of 100 mg/kg body weight.</p><p>The promising results of insecticidal activity obtained in previous works and the safety results obtained in this study with the CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> extract of H. pinifolia, allow us to consider this extract as a potential raw material for the development of an insecticide of natural origin, safe for human health and the environment.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding</title><p>This work was supported financially by grants UBACYT (University of Buenos Aires, Science, and Technology) 20020170100752BA and UBATCYT 20020130-100705BA of the University of Buenos Aires.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to University of Buenos Aires for financial support UBACyT. We are also grateful to Prof. Dr. Gustavo Giberti for identification of the plant.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Cufre, I.M., Broussalis, A.M. and Gorzalczany, S.B. (2023) Safety Evaluation of the Dichloromethane Extract of Hysterionica pinifolia: A Potential Raw Material for the Development of Biopesticides. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 11, 66-78. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2023.117007</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126295-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, N., Yu, W., Jiang, J. and Dai, G. (2021) Insecticidal Activities of Salvia hispanica L. Essential Oil and Combinations of Their Main Compounds against the Beet Armyworm Spodoptera exigua. Industrial Crops and Products, 162, Article ID: 113271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ataei, M. and Abdollahi, M. (2022) A Systematic Review of Mechanistic Studies on the Relationship between Pesticide Exposure and Cancer Induction. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 456, Article ID: 116280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2022.116280</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matich, E., Laryea, J., Seely, K, Stahr, S., Su, J. and Hsu, P. (2021) Association between Pesticide Exposure and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Incidence: A Systematic Review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 219, Article ID: 112327.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112327</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ventura, C., Zappia, C., Lasagna, M., Pavici, W., Richard, S., Bolzan, A., Monczor, F., Núnez, M. and Cocca, C. (2019) Effects of the Pesticide Chlorpyrifos on Breast Cancer Disease. Implication of Epigenetic Mechanisms. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 186, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.09.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pavela, R. (2016) History, Presence and Perspective of Using Plant Extracts as Commercial Botanical Insecticides and Farm Products for Protection against Insects—A Review. Plant Protection Science, 52, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.17221/31/2016-PPS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaller, J., Kruse-Pla&amp;szlig;b, M., Schlechtriemen, U., Gruber, E., Peer, M., Nadeemd, I., Formayer, H., Hutter, H. and Landler, L. (2022) Pesticides in Ambient Air, Influenced by Surrounding Land Use and Weather, Pose a Potential Threat to Biodiversity and Humans. Science of the Total Environment, 838, Article ID: 156012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sorensen, P., Kjaer, C., Wiberg-Larsen, P., Bruus, M., Strandberg, B., Rasmussen, J., Damgaard, C., Larsen, S. and Strandberg, M. (2020) Pesticide Risk Indicator for Terrestrial Adult Stages of Aquatic Insects. Ecological Indicators, 118, Article ID: 106718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106718</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isman, M.B. (2015). A Renaissance for Botanical Insecticides? Pest Management Science, 71, 1587-1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Céspedes, C.L., Salazar, J.R., Ariza-Castolo, A., Yamaguchi, L., ávila, J.G., Aqueveque, P., Kubo, I. and Alarcón, J. (2014) Biopesticides from Plants: Calceolaria integrifolia s.l. Environmental Research, 132, 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broussalis, A., Clemente, S. and Ferraro, G. (2010) Hybanthus parviflorus (Violaceae): Insecticidal Activity of a South American Plant. Crop Protection, 29, 953-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tarcaya</surname><given-names> V.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Di Leo Lira</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Cufre I.</surname><given-names> González</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.</surname><given-names> Clemente</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S. and Broussalis</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>Ovidia andina: Actividad Insecticida, Extracto y Compuestos Bioactivos</article-title><source> Revista Latinoamericana de Química</source><volume> 42</volume>,<fpage> 89</fpage>-<lpage>96</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tito Mansilla, J., Tarcaya, V.P., Cufre, I.M., Fabrizio, M.C., Wright, E.R., Broussalis, A.M. and Rivera, M.C. (2018) Control of Rhizoctonia Solani with Extracts Obtained from Ovidia Andina. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, 50, 355-368. https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/12070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pavela, R. and Benelli, G. (2016) Ethnobotanical Knowledge on Botanical Repellents Employed in the African Region against Mosquito Vectors—A Review. Experimental Parasitology, 167, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2016.05.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cufre, I.M., Tarcaya, V., Broussalis, A. and Mino, J. (2014) Hybanthus parviflorus and H. bigibbosus (Violaceae): Acute and Subchronic Oral Toxicity Assessment of Hydroalcoholic Extracts in Rodents. Revista Latinoamericana de Química, 42, 50-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cabrera, A. (1963) Flora de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Colección Científica del INTA. Buenos Aires.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cufre, I.M., Fabián, L.E., Clemente, S.V., Bandoni, A.L. and Broussalis, A.M. (2022) Bioactive Compounds and Insecticidal Activity of Hysterionica pinifolia, a Native South American Plant. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 815-832.https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.136055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bohlmann, F., Burkhardt, T. and Zdero, C. (1973) Naturally Occurring Acetylenes. Academic Press, London, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Christensen, L.P. and Brandt, K. (2006) Acetylenes and Psoralens. In: Crozier, A., Clifford, M. and Ashihara, H., Eds., Plant Secondary Metabolites Occurrence, Structure and Role in the Human Diet, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 137-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988558.ch5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, M., Zhang, W. and Su, J. (2016) Toxic Polyacetylenes in the Genus Bupleurum (Apiaceae)—Distribution, Toxicity, Molecular Mechanism and Analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 193, 566-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.09.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Machado, S., Silva, E. and Massa, A. (2002) Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Falcarinol. Contact Dermatitis, 47, 113-114. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470210_5.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buskuhl, H., Alves de Freitas, R., Delle, F., Barison, A., Campos, F., Corilo, Y., Eberlin, M. and Biavatti, M. (2009) A New Polyacetylene from Vernonia scorpioides (Lam.) Pers. (Asteraceae) and Its in Vitro Antitumoral Activity. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 20, 1327-1333. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532009000700018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Seigler, D. (1983) Role of Lipids in Plant Resistance to Insects. In: Hedin, A. Ed., Plant Resistance to Insects, ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1983-0208.ch018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OECD (2015) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, Test No. 404: Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion. OECD Publishing, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OECD (2015) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4 Test No. 405: Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion. OECD Publishing, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OECD (2001) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4 Test No. 420: Acute Oral Toxicity—Fixed Dose Procedure. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/suppdocs/feddocs/oecd/oecd_gl420.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OECD (2008) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents. OECD Publishing, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, Y., Jaja-Chimedza, A., Merrill, D., Mendes, O. and Raskin, I. (2018) A 14-Day Repeated-Dose Oral Toxicological Evaluation of an Isothiocyanate-Enriched Hydro-Alcoholic Extract from Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds in Rats. Toxicology Reports, 5, 418-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.02.012Ema, M., Matsuda, A., Kobayashi, N., Naya Junko, M. and Nakanishi, J. (2011) Evaluation of Dermal and Eye Irritation and Skin Sensitization due to Carbon Nanotubes. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 61, 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2003) Committee on Agriculture (COAG). Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development (SARD) and Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). FAO, Rome.http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/006/y8704e.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corvaro, M., Gehen, S., Andrews, K., Chatfield, R., Macleod, F. and Mehta, J. (2017) A Retrospective Analysis of in Vivo Eye Irritation, Skin Irritation and Skin Sensitisation Studies with Agrochemical Formulations: Setting the Scene for Development of Alternative Strategies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 89, 131-147.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ng’uni, T., Klaasen, J.A. and Fielding, B.C. (2018) Acute Toxicity Studies of the South African Medicinal Plant Galenia africana. Toxicology Reports, 5, 813-818.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2020) The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification, 2019 Edition.  https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240005662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lulekal, E., Tesfaye, S., Christos, S., Dires, K., Zenebe, T., Zegeye, N., Feleke, G., Kassahun, A., Shiferaw, Y. and Mekonnen, A. (2019) Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Skin Irritation, Acute and Sub-Acute Toxicity of Cymbopogon citratus Essential Oil in Mice and Rabbits. Toxicology Reports, 6, 1289-1294.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dongmo, O.L.M., Epoh, N.J., Tadjoua, H.T., Yousuf, S., Telefo, P.B., Tapondjou, L.A. and Choudhary, M.I. (2019) Acute and Sub-Acute Toxicity of the Aqueous Extract from the Stem Bark of Tetrapleura tetrapteura Taub. (Fabaceae) in Mice and Rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 236, 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.02.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michael, B., Yano, B., Sellers, R.S., Perry, R., Morton, D., Roome, N., Johnson, J.K. and Schafer, K. (2007) Evaluation of Organ Weights for Rodent and Non-Rodent Toxicity Studies: A Review of Regulatory Guidelines and a Survey of Current Practices. Toxicologic Pathology, 35, 742-750. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701595292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christapher, P.V., Parasuraman, S., Asmawi, M.Z. and Murugaiyah, V. (2017) Acute and Subchronic Toxicity Studies of Methanol Extract of Polygonum minus Leaves in Sprague Dawley Rats. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 86, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.02.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126295-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olson, H., Betton, G., Robinson, D., Thomas, K., Monro, A., Kolaja, G., Lilly, P., Sanders, J., Sipes, G., Braceen, W., Dorato, M., Van Deun, K., Smith, P., Berger, B. and Heller, A. (2000) Concordance of Toxicity of Pharmaceuticals in Humans and in Animals. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 32, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.2000.1399</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>