<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2023.137028</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-126239</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Depositional Environment of Sediments in Tonle Sap Sedimentary Basin, Western Part of Cambodia: Insights from Field and Geochemical Studies
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sopheap</surname><given-names>Pech</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chandoeun</surname><given-names>Eng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chanmoly</surname><given-names>Or</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Afikah</surname><given-names>Binti Rahim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ratha</surname><given-names>Heng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chitra</surname><given-names>Buth</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sreymean</surname><given-names>Sio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Geo-Resources and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Technology of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Research and Innovation Center, Institute of Technology of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>651</fpage><lpage>666</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Tonle Sap sedimentary basin was considered a favorable geological condition for hydrocarbon accumulation in the onshore Cambodia. Two exposure outcrops in Battambang province, called Somlout and Takream, were selected to represent sediments in this basin. The sedimentology and geochemistry studies provide insights into the depositional environment of sediments using field investigation, lithological, sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical analysis. The redox condition, water column, and depositional setting were analyzed by plotting the ratio of V vs. Cr, Uauthigenic vs. V/Cr, Sr vs. Ba, Ca vs. (Fe + Ca), and Fe
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>/TiO
  <sub>2</sub> vs. Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>/(Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub> + Fe
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>) diagram. Moreover, these diagrams can be used to predict depositional conditions as well. Based on the results, Somlout and Takream comprise calcareous shale and limestone facies. The geochemical analysis showed that Somlout calcareous shale samples were deposited in the dysoxic freshwater of the lake setting during the regression, while Somlout limestones and Takream were deposited in high salinity seawater, oxic condition of shallow-marine water. In addition, Somlout limestones consist of fragmental fusulinid foraminifera, bivalve shelve, and bryozoan, which suggest a barrier environment. Meanwhile, Teakream consists of fine-grained calcareous shale, and lime-mudstone, which are presented to form in the quiet marine setting of the lagoon environment. Therefore, the Tonle Sap basin sediments were deposited in the Somlout area’s barrier and lake environment, and the lagoon environment for Takream.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Depositional Environment</kwd><kwd> Sedimentary Basin</kwd><kwd> Geochemistry</kwd><kwd> Paleontology</kwd><kwd> Tonle Sap</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cambodia consists of seven sedimentary basins with onshore and offshore oil and gas potential, such as in Khmer, Kampong-Som, Tonle Sap, Khorat, Preah, Chung, and Svayrieng sedimentary basins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref2">2</xref>] . In the early 1960s, Polish geologists conducted geological fields and notified some oil and gas seepages in the southwest Tonle Sap sedimentary basin. In 1996, hydrocarbon exploration was surveyed with airborne gravity and magnetic survey around this basin by Japan National Oil Corporation (JNOC). Based on these geophysical data, this sedimentary basin covers approximately 23,800 km<sup>2</sup> in the center of Cambodia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref2">2</xref>] and was defined into two sub-sedimentary basins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref3">3</xref>] . However, there is no detailed study of the depositional environment of the Permian unit in this basin yet. Hence, this paper investigates two outcrops of Permian sediments exposed in the western part of the Tonle Sap sedimentary basin. They were selected to represent the Permian unit in this basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geological map of study areas. Red dots are the sampling locations, Takream and Somlout [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref4">4</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x2.png"/></fig><p>The characterization of the depositional environment of sediments in the Tonle Sap sedimentary basin was obtained from field investigation, lithological, sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical analysis. Two primary purposes of this research are 1) to investigate detailed lithostratigraphy of these Permian sedimentary rocks and 2) to discuss the depositional environment using sedimentology paleontology, and geochemistry studies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Setting and Basin Evolution</title><p>The regional geology of Cambodia was probably affected by the combination of three primary collisions, such as Sibumasu-Sukhothai Arc and Indochina, South China and Indochina and Paleo-Pacific and Indochina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref6">6</xref>] , which resulted in three regional Fold Belts in Indochina as well as inside Cambodia, and was identified as Phetchabun fold belt in the northwestern part, Khmer Chanthaburi fold belt, and Kampot fold belt in the southwestern region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), that be affected</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Indochina map with selected structural elements, two major fold belts transect the region and connect to the Mae Ping Fault Zone (MPFZ) and Three Pagoda Fault Zone (TPFZ) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref6">6</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x3.png"/></fig><p>by the many phases of folding orogeny during the collision of Sukhothai Arc and western Indochina Terrane in Late Triassic-Early Jurassic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Tonle Sap sedimentary basin is bordered to the north by the orogenic uplift that is comparable to the transpression zone of the northwest-southeast-trending Mae Ping Fault zone, and farther to the north by the southernmost monocline of Khorat Basin, Thailand (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref7">7</xref>] . This foreland sedimentary basin may have developed between the Paleozoic and Mesozoic due to being filled with Late Carboniferous-Permian carbonate and Mesozoic sandstone with alternative sandstones-claystone, limestone, and claystone with some coal beds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref3">3</xref>] . Furthermore, this sedimentary basin was affected by Mae Ping Fault in the Middle Eocene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref9">9</xref>] . This fault is the main strike-slip fault which extended from Thailand in the northwest, cutting the Tonle Sap basin and continued to southeastward to the Vietnam Sea. The left-lateral strike-slip Mae Ping Fault [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref6">6</xref>] , which formed in Middle Eocene-Early Oligocene might create rifting and extension in Tonle Sap sedimentary basin and end in Early Oligocene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref7">7</xref>] ; and can change direction to be right-lateral in Early Miocene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref10">10</xref>] , that might produce the basin inversion during the Early-Middle Miocene.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Stratigraphy Measurement</title><p>The geological fieldwork has been conducted in Takream commune, Banan District, and Somlout commune, Somlout District in Battambang Province, the western part of the Tonle Sap sedimentary basin. The thickness of individual facies succession was measured from these two well-exposed Permian sedimentary outcrops, Takream and Somlout. Each stratigraphy interval’s sedimentary texture, structure, fossil content, and thickness have been recorded for facies analysis as evidence to interpret the sedimentary process and the details of the depositional environment.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Laboratory Works</title><p>There are 13 representative samples, five samples from Somlout and eight samples from Takream, calcareous shale (solid green triangle in the stratigraphy column), and limestone (solid red triangle in the stratigraphy column) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), were collected during the construction stratigraphy column. These samples were prepared through laboratory works, petrography, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).</p><p>The samples were cleaned, cut, and ground with diamond powder to get a thickness of 30 micrometers for petrography analysis to identify the minerals and fossil contents with Eclipse Ci-Pol. Moreover, samples were grounded to be powder and compacted in sample holders for XRF analysis with the model of Rigaku ZSX Primus III+. Thus, the oxide compound of these samples can be identified. The other parts of the samples were ground to 74 micrometers in a</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Stratigraphy column of Somlout, green triangle is shale sample, red triangle is limestone sample</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x4.png"/></fig><p>ball mill of about 0.25 mg per sample and analyzed with ICP-MS at ALS analytical services in Vientiane, Laos. For this analysis, powder samples were digested with perchloric, nitric, hydrofluoric, and hydrochloric acids. The residue was topped up with dilute hydrochloric acid. The trace and major elements were plotted in indicating depositional conditions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Result and Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Sedimentological Features</title><p>According to stratigraphy measurement, the stratigraphy column of Takream and Somlout outcrops consist of the same lithofacies of sediments, calcareous shale, and limestone, however, the results of petrography, XRF, and ICP -MS analysis showed that the properties of these facies are different in compositions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The details of lithofacies analysis and interpretation are described in the following sections.</p><sec id="s4_1_1"><title>4.1.1. Somlout Outcrop</title><p>Somlout outcrop is controlled by an anticline structure with a total thickness of approximately 17.5 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), including two lithofacies of calcareous shale and limestone. Those lithofacies have a strike N080˚E 70˚NW from the horizontal plane. The calcareous shale facies were exposed to approximately 0.4 - 2.0 m bedding. It is black, silt to clay size, and some parts were affected by moderate to predominantly weathered. The limestone facies are subdivided into medium and coarse-grained limestone. The dark grey medium-grained limestone facies exposed approximately 0.1 - 0.3 m in thickness with moderately sorted. It is composed of mainly carbonated grain and micrite. The coarse-grained limestone facies are medium grey color and poorly sorted. It was deposited at the bottom of the formation with thicknesses of about 9 m. It is dominated by carbonate grain, micrite, and lithic fragments with the raging size of 0.5 - 1 cm.</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_2"><title>4.1.2. Takream Outcrop</title><p>Takream outcrop is well bedded with a total thickness of approximately 105.0 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), including two distinguish lithofacies of calcareous shale and limestone with N055˚E 20˚NW of dipping angle. Shale facies were deposited approximately 4.0 - 15.0 m, and the bedding also contained sub-bedding in them with a thickness between 0.2 - 0.4 m. Moreover, these facies were exposed as an interbedded layer with limestone bedding. Its grain size varies from silt to clay grain, black color, a massive structure, and is rich in carbonate minerals. Limestone facies were exposed as inter-bedded, with thicknesses between 2.5 - 40.0 m, and they also contain sub-bedding in them with a varied range of thickness of 0.2 - 0.6 m. These facies are characterized as dark grey color, very fine grain, and massive structure. Moreover, according to physical properties, it is dominated by calcite and matrix and considered matrix-supported limestone.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Lithofacies Analysis</title><p>According to the examined of petrographically analysis, Somlout shale consists mainly of clay minerals, less quartz, and fracture creaking of organic matter (black color), which indicates as the high temperature was applied after deposition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref11">11</xref>] . This shale is dominated by clay −96.20%, and quartz −3.8%, and is classified as a clay-dominated lithotype [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref12">12</xref>] . Furthermore, limestone consists mainly of calcite grain, quartz, micrite, and fossil. They</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Stratigraphy column of Takream, green triangle is shale sample, red triangle is limestone sample</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Petrographic analysis of Somlout Samples. (a) and (b) are S-S1, showing the fracture creaking of organic matter in black color; (c) and (d) are S-L1, showing bivalve shell that was replaced by quartz; (e) and (f) are S-L3, showing bryozoan; (g) and (h) are S-L4, showing fusulinid foraminifera. Q: Quartz, Cl: Clay minerals, FC: Fracture creaking of organic matter, Bsh: Bivalve shell, Br: Bryozoan, Ca: Calcite, and Mc: Micrite</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x6.png"/></fig><p>are dominant grains, ranging from −46.79% −64.22% and micrite −35.78% −53.28%. Limestones are classified as wackestone and packstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref13">13</xref>] . The presence of substantial micrite in limestone is commonly interpreted to indicate the deposition under the low energy flow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref14">14</xref>] . Therefore, fragmental fossils such as 2 mm of bivalve shells in S-L1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(d)), 1 - 2 mm bryozoan (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(e), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(f)), and 1 mm fusulinid foraminifera in S-L3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(g), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(h)) were found to be the depositional indicators.</p><p>Takream calcareous shale consists of carbonate mud, calcite minerals, and organic matter. It comprises carbonate mud −50.80% - 60.60%, quartz −30.20% to 43.00%, and clay minerals −6.20% to 9.20%. It is classified as silica-rich carbonate mudstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref12">12</xref>] . Under the microscope, sample T-S1 showed carbonate mud, calcite mineral, siliceous sponge spicules, and organic matter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)). Limestone mainly comprises carbonate mud −22.60% to 96.80% and calcite grain −3.20% to 77.40% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)). It is classified as packstone and lime-mudstone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Major Elements</title><p>Major oxide concentrations in calcareous shales and limestones of Somlout and Takream were obtained from XRF analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Calcareous shale has a high concentration of SiO<sub>2</sub> ranging from 42.00% to 75.00% with a mean value of 62.68%, CaO ranges from 0.96% to 26.30% with a mean value of 12.01%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ranges from 0.97% to 10.05% with a mean value of 5.92%, and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ranges from 1.40% to 5.29% with a mean value of 3.56%. Meanwhile, limestone concentrations of SiO<sub>2</sub> range from 0.38% - 15.85% with the mean value of 9.97%, CaO ranges from 42.60% - 57.00% with the mean value of 47.99%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ranges from 0.04% - 2.49% with the mean value of 0.75%, and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ranges from 0.05% - 1.68% with the mean value of 0.56%. These represent the most abundant elements (Si, Ca, Al, and Fe), consistent with the abundant occurrence of carbonate minerals, quartz, and pyrite in calcareous shale and limestones of the Tonle Sap</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Petrographic analysis of Takream samples. (a) and (b) are T-S1 under PPL and XPL; (c) and (d) are T-LB under PPL and XPL. Ca: Calcite grain, OM: Organic matter, Cm: carbonate mud, Hs: Hexactine sponge, Ms: Monaxon sponge</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x7.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Major elements concentration (wt%) of Somlout and Takream samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-L1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-L3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-S3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-L4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-S4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-L12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-L9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-L14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-L15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-L16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean S/UC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean L/UC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>sedimentary basin.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Trace Elements</title><p>Trace element concentrations of shale and limestone of both locations in Battambang province were obtained from ICP-MS analysis and are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The concentration of V, Cr, Ga, Rb, Nb, Ba, Th, Zr, Hf, Ce, La, Nd, W, and Y (mean value for shale 75.25, 65.00, 6.98, 18.00, 1.73, 65.20, 1.26, 40.50, 1.13, 10.00, 5.13, 5.55, 0.25, 9.25 and mean value for limestone 21.22, 31.11, 0.91, 1.23, 0.20, 41.64, 0.08, 3.78, 0.11, 9.27, 5.67, 5.02, 0.00, 8.50, respectively) are smaller than those of UC, except Sr which is higher than UC (1.52 for shale, and 3.29 for limestone).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Redox Conditions</title><p>The Vanadium (V) and Chromium (Cr) are essential indicators for redox conditions to estimate the degree of oxygen dissolved in water during the sediment deposited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref15">15</xref>] . Cr is usually incorporated within the detrital clastic fraction of s sediment where it may substitute for Al within clays, be adsorbed, or occur as</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Trace elements concentrations (ppm) of Somlout and Takream samples.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.126239-formula1"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>chromite. Vanadium in contrast may be bound to organic matter by the incorporation into porphyrins and is concentrated in sediments deposited under reducing conditions. The ratio V/Cr has been suggested as an index of palaeo-oxygenation, oxic to anoxic bottom waters environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] . It has been proposed that the value of V/Cr ratio is less than 2 suggests the oxic condition (the oxygen concentration range from 2 - 860 ml/L), 2 to 4.25 indicates the dysoxic condition (the oxygen concentration range from 2 - 0.2 ml/L), and more than 4.25 suggests suboxic to anoxic condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref17">17</xref>] . Somlout samples have a V/Cr value ranging from 0.93 to 3.87, shale sample values are 3.30 and 3.87 are suggested as dysoxic conditions and other samples are suggested as oxic conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)). Takream samples have a V/Cr value ranging from 0.28 to 1.30, which is suggested as the oxic condition.</p><p>The Uauthigenic value less than 5 ppm, from 5 ppm to 12 ppm, and higher than 12 ppm, indicated oxic, dysoxic, and anoxic conditions, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref18">18</xref>] . The average of Uauthigenic of Somlout and Takream samples is equal to 0.42 ppm and 2.28 ppm, respectively, which suggests to oxic condition environment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)). Moreover, the oxic condition is generally defined as a reducing environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Water Column Environment</title><p>The chemical precipitate is resulted from the interaction between sediments and calcium. Calcium is a major chemical constituent of seawater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref20">20</xref>] . The Ca/(Fe + Ca) ratios of argillaceous sediments can provide a direct estimate of paleosalinity throughout the fresh water to marine water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref20">20</xref>] . The values for modern sea samples are more than 0.8, whereas the values for modern lake samples are less than 0.6 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] . In addition, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] suggests that a high Sr/Ba ratio value of more than 0.8 indicates high salinity, while a low Sr/Ba value of less than 0.5 indicates low salinity water or freshwater environment. Shale samples from Somlout have the value of Ca/(Fe + Ca) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(c)) and Sr/Ba (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(d)) range from 0.15 to 0.18 and 0.24 to 0.32, averaging 0.17 and 0.28, respectively, indicating a freshwater lake environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] . In limestone samples in this formation range from 0.96 to 0.98 and 0.95 to 110, averaging 0.97 and 49.11, respectively, which suggests high salinity seawater environment. This condition indicated that the lithologies (shale and limestone) in Somlout samples were deposited in two different conditions involving sea-level fluctuation. The Ca/(Fe + Ca) and Sr/Ba value of both calcareous shale and limestone of the Takream sample range from 0.91 to 0.97 and 11.8 to 1450, averaging 0.97 and 387.14, respectively, which indicate a high salinity seawater environment.</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Depositional Setting</title><p>The Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) ratio can be used as an index to determine the sedimentary environment, with a value ranging from 0.4 to 0.7 in the oceanic basin, indicating a deep-water, and from 0.5 to 0.9 in the continental margin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>]</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Plotting diagram showing depositional setting of calcareous shale and limestone in Somlout and Takream samples, (a) is V vs. Cr ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref17">17</xref>] ; (b) is Ca vs. (Fe+Ca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref20">20</xref>] ; (c) is Uauthigenic vs. V/Cr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref18">18</xref>] ; (d) is Sr vs. Ba ratio, showing water column environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref21">21</xref>] ; E is Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) diagram [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref22">22</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1211695x9.png"/></fig><p>(<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(e)). The concentration of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is affiliated with aluminosilicate phases; it is an excellent indicator for terrigenous input, and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> are rich in the metalliferous mid-oceanic ridge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref22">22</xref>] . Thus, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> ratio in the mid-oceanic ridge is higher than the continental margin. Moreover, the cross-plot value of Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) can be used to distinguish the continental margin from the mid-oceanic ridge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref22">22</xref>] . The Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) ratio of Somlout samples ranges from 0.50 to 0.66, all falling into the overlapping area of the oceanic basin and continental margin. The Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) ratio of Takream samples ranges from 0.36 to 0.63, mostly falling into or near the overlapping area of the oceanic basin and continental margin.</p><p>Based on paleontological aspects, the presence of fusulinid and bivalve shelve was commonly suggested in a shallow water environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref24">24</xref>] , while bryozoan mainly indicated a marine environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref25">25</xref>] , because these types of micro-fossil mostly live in these conditions. The recognized fossils of bryozoans, fusulinids, and small foraminifers, are skeletal or fragmental debris, indicating that the depositional environment must be a barrier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref26">26</xref>] . Somlout depositional condition might be a significant regression depending on the lithostratigraphy of limestone at the bottom, followed by shale at the top [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Takream fine-grained shale and limestone are suggested to form in a quiet marine water setting, a lagoon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126239-ref27">27</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>According to various geochemical elements and the ratios of V vs. Cr, Uauthigenic vs. V/Cr, Sr vs. Ba, Ca vs. (Fe+Ca), and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) diagram, Somlout, and Takream are deposited in the shallow marine environment. Somlout shales sample was deposited in the dysoxic fresh water of the lake setting during the sea-level drop. Somlout limestones and Takream samples were deposited in high salinity seawater, oxic condition of shallow-marine water. In addition, Somlout limestones consist of fragmental fusulinid foraminifera, bivalve shells fragment, and bryozoan, which are indicated a barrier environment. Meanwhile, Teakream consists of fine-grained shale, and lime mudstone, which are suggested to deposit in a quiet marine setting of the lagoon. In conclusion, Tonle Sap basin sediments were deposited in shallow marine, the barrier and lake environment for Somlout, and the lagoon environment for Takream.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This project was funded by the Cambodia Higher Education Improvement Project (Credit No. 6221-KH) and the Laboratory-Based Education Project (LBE) of JICA. The authors would like to thank Faculty of Geo-resources and Geotechnical Engineering of Institute of Technology of Cambodia for laboratory supporting, and the General Department of Petroleum (GDP), the Ministry of Mine and Energy (MME) for fieldwork cooperation.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pech, S., Eng, C., Or, C., Rahim, A.B., Heng, R., Buth, C. and Sio, S. (2023) Depositional Environment of Sediments in Tonle Sap Sedimentary Basin, Western Part of Cambodia: Insights from Field and Geochemical Studies. Open Journal of Geology, 13, 651-666. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2023.137028</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126239-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mao, C., Yamada, Y. and Matsuoka, T. (2014) A Preliminary Assessment of Geological CO2 Storage in Cambodia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 30, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vysotsky, V.I., Rodnikova, R.D. and Li, M.N. (1994) The Petroleum Geology of Cambodia. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 17, 195-210.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1994.tb00126.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lim, V. (2006) Petroleum Policy and Management Project: Update on Petroleum Activities in Cambodia. 6th PPM Cambodia Case Study Workshop, Siem Reap, 21-25 February 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GDMR-JICA (2010) Geological Map of Cambodia, 1:200,000. General Department of Mine Resources-JICA, Phnom Penh.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, J.X. and Zhang, K.J. (2009) A New Model for the Indochina and South China Collision during the Late Permian to the Middle Triassic. Tectonophysics, 467, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.12.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fyhn, M.B., Green, P.F., Bergman, S.C., Van Itterbeeck, J., Tri, T.V., Dien, P.T., et al. (2016) Cenozoic Deformation and Exhumation of the Kampot Fold Belt and Implications for South Indochina Tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121, 5278-5307. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012847</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fyhn, M.B., Pedersen, S.A., Boldreel, L.O., Nielsen, L.H., Green, P.F., Dien, P.T., et al. (2010) Palaeocene-Early Eocene Inversion of the Phuquoc-Kampot Som Basin: Se Asian Deformation Associated with the Suturing of Luconia. Journal of the Geological Society, 167, 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492009-039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lepvrier, C., Van Vuong, N., Maluski, H., Thi, P.T. and Van Vu, T. (2008) Indosinian Tectonics in Vietnam. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 340, 94-111.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lacassin, R., Maluski, H., Leloup, P.H., Tapponnier, P., Hinthong, C., Siribhakdi, K., et al. (1997) Tertiary Diachronic Extrusion and Deformation of Western Indochina: Structural and 40Ar/39Ar Evidence from NW Thailand. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 102, 10013-10037.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03831</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fyhn, M.B., Boldreel, L.O. and Nielsen, L.H. (2010) Escape Tectonism in the Gulf of Thailand: Paleogene Left-Lateral Pull-Apart Rifting in the Vietnamese Part of the Malay Basin. Tectonophysics, 483, 365-376.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobchenko, M., Panahi, H., Renard, F., Dysthe, D.K., Malthe-Sorenssen, A., Mazzini, A., et al. (2011) Fracturing Controlled Primary Migration of Hydrocarbon Fluids during Heating of Organic-Rich Shales. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2, 1-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gamero-Diaz, H., Miller, C. and Lewis, R. (2013) Core: A Mineralogy Based Classification Scheme for Organic Mudstones. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September 2013.  
https://doi.org/10.2118/166284-MS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dunham, R.J. (1962) Classification of Carbonate Rocks according to Depositional Textures. In: Ham, W.E., Ed., Classification of Carbonate Rocks, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boggs Jr., S. (2009) Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626487</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, B. and Manning, D.A. (1994) Comparison of Geochemical Indices Used for the Interpretation of Palaeoredox Conditions in Ancient Mudstones. Chemical Geology, 111, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90085-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, C., Ji, L., Su, A., Wu, Y., Zhang, M., Zhou, S., et al. (2019) Source-Rock Evaluation and Depositional Environment of Black Shales in the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Southern Ordos Basin, North-Central China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 173, 899-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.089</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tyson, R.V. and Pearson, T.H. (1991) Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia: An Overview. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 58, 1-24.  
https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1991.058.01.01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Myers, K.J. and Wignall, P.B. (1987) Understanding Jurassic organic-Rich Mudrocks—New Concepts Using Gamma-Ray Spectrometry and Palaeo-Ecology: Examples from the Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset and the Jet Rock of Yorkshire. In: Leggett, J.K. and Zuffa, G.G., Eds., Marine Clastic Sedimentology, Springer, Dordrecht, 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3241-8_9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Isaksen, G.H. and Bohacs, K.M. (1995) Geological Controls of Source Rock Geochemistry through Relative Sea Level; Triassic, Barents Sea. In: Katz, B.J., Ed., Petroleum Source Rocks. Casebooks in Earth Sciences, Springer, Berlin, 25-50.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78911-3_3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nelson, B.W. (1967) Sedimentary Phosphate Method for Estimating Paleosalinities. Science, 158, 917-920. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.158.3803.917</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, H.W. and Qian, K. (1993) Analysis of Sedimentary Geochemistry and Environment. Gansu Science and Technology Publishing House, Lanzhou. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murray, R.W. (1994) Chemical Criteria to Identify the Depositional Environment of Chert: General Principles and Applications. Sedimentary Geology, 90, 213-232.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(94)90039-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asl, S.S. and Aleali, M. (2016) Microfacies Patterns and Depositional Environments of the Sarvak Formation in the Abadan Plain, Southwest of Zagros, Iran. Open Journal of Geology, 6, 201-209. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2016.63018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boggs Jr., S. (2012) Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Pearson, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scholle, P.A. and Ulmer-Scholle, D.S. (2003) A Color Guide to the Petrography of Carbonate Rocks: Grains, Textures, Porosity, Diagenesis. In: AAPG Memoir 77, Vol. 77, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa.  
https://doi.org/10.1306/M77973</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chutakositkanon, V., Charusiri, P. and Sashida, K. (2000) Lithostratigraphy of Permian Marine Sequences, Khao Pun Area, Central Thailand: Paleoenvironments and Tectonic History. Island Arc, 9, 173-187.  
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1738.2000.00270.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126239-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nichols, G. (2009) Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>