<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Enzyme Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2328-4846</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aer.2023.112005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AER-126114</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of Purified Indian Cattle Tick &lt;i&gt;Rhipicephalus microplus&lt;/i&gt; Saliva Toxins on Various Enzymes in Blood Serum, Liver and Muscles of Albino Mice
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nidhi</surname><given-names>Yadav</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ravi</surname><given-names>Kant Upadhyay</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Zoology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In the present investigation, 
  <em>in vivo</em> effects of purified ticks’ saliva toxin were evaluated on the level of certain important cellular metabolic enzymes 
  <em>i.e.</em> acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase. For this purpose, sub-lethal doses, 40% and 80% of 24 h LD50 purified saliva toxins of 
  <em>Rhipicephalus microplus</em> (Canestrini, 1888) were injected subcutaneously in the albino mice. In treated mice saliva toxins targeted membrane-bound enzymes i.e. serum acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase, its level was increased from 118.30% to 163.63% at the 6th hr in comparison to the control. Besides this, the levels of serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) also increased up to 161.11% (at 6th hr), 148.27 (at 8th hr) and 125.45% (at 6th hr) respectively in comparison to control. An increase in the level of LDH showed insufficient oxygen supply, massive disintegration of cells and leakage of the enzyme into the circulation. It clearly indicated the toxic effects of saliva toxins on the membrane of blood cells, hepatocytes and myocardial muscle cell functions in albino mice. On the other hand activity of acetyl cholinesterase was reduced by 65.51% at the 6th hr of the saliva toxin injection in comparison to the control. This inhibition of acetyl cholinesterase activity caused the accumulation of acetylcholine molecules at the synaptic junctions and led to prolonged activation of acetylcholine receptors. It caused permanent stimulation of nerves and muscle cells that may result in muscular paralysis and finally death of the animal.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Rhipicephalus microplus&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Serum</kwd><kwd> Liver and Rectus Abdominis</kwd><kwd> Gastrocnemius</kwd><kwd> Muscle</kwd><kwd> Atria and Ventricle Acid Phosphatase (ACP)</kwd><kwd>  Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)</kwd><kwd> Glutamate Pyruvate Transaminase (GPT) and Glutamate Oxaloacetate Transaminase (GOT)</kwd><kwd> Lactic Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Acetylcholinesterase (AchE)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ticks are obligate hematophagous ectoparasites which rely on host blood to derive nutrition. Ticks are major vectors of a number of pathogens i.e. viruses, rickettsiae, spirochetes, bacteria, fungi, protozoa and filarial nematodes in humans, livestock and wild animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref1">1</xref>] . These affect the health and survival of both domestic and wild animals worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref1">1</xref>] . Ticks obtain nutrients from blood meals to fulfill their metabolic requirements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref1">1</xref>] . During feeding ticks discharge salivary secretion or cocktail of diverse molecules in the blood of the host. Tick saliva especially secretes anti-coagulatory molecules mainly salivary proteins which inhibit blood clotting and assist in uninterrupting blood feeding by rupturing host skin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref2">2</xref>] . Through blood feeding these transfer or inject pathogens into the bloodstream and easily transmit various disease pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref4">4</xref>] . Transmission of pathogens results in various diseases and morbidities causing more serious economic losses to humans and livestock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref5">5</xref>] . The main factors of tick parasitism are blood-sucking and saliva secretion, host immune status, age, breed and local ecology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The tick’s fat body plays an essential role in energy storage and utilization. Salivary protein insists ticks have blood meal and the whole process depends upon the injection of tick saliva and its mixing in the blood [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref7">7</xref>] . Ticks saliva contains so many proteins which display strong pharmacological and immunological activities. These proteins are mainly used in host invasion for blood feeding and are known as evasions. Salivary proteins assist ticks in feeding for more than 8 - 10 days without being noticed by the host animal. These block secretion of the host’s chemokines and prevent painful inflammation. Ticks also generate iron-bound proteins i.e. ferritins during blood feeding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref9">9</xref>] . Lipocalins are abundant proteins in the saliva of both soft and hard ticks. Lipocalin isolated from Ixodes ricinus (LIR) was associated with the modulation of inflammation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref10">10</xref>] . Tick saliva proteins are involved in several physiological roles, including egg development, transportation of proteins, immunity and anti-microorganism, anti-coagulant, and adhesion. Thus, tick saliva not only controls host hemostasis and wound healing but also subverts the host immune response to avoid tick rejection that creates a favorable niche for the survival and propagation of diverse tick-borne pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Tick saliva toxins cause significant alterations in various biomolecules after in vivo injection in albino mice. These significantly target various metabolic enzymes and severely affect the host’s physiological and metabolic functions. Similar to other toxic substances these severely affect the activity of various metabolic enzymes mainly acetylcholinesterase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref11">11</xref>] , Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref12">12</xref>] and impose cytotoxicity in muscles, serum and liver cells (LDH) level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref12">12</xref>] . These cause cell necrosis and death, display hepatoxicity and damage to cardiac muscles and subsequently increase the LDH activity in the serum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref13">13</xref>] . Similarly, plasma and blood cholinesterases level also get increased that also displays toxicity in the liver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref14">14</xref>] . Two important enzymes glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) were found in the liver, heart cells, muscle tissue, pancreas and kidney. Alteration in levels of these enzymes displays damage to these tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref15">15</xref>] . Herbicides such as atrazine severely affect lipid peroxidation in fish Channa punctatus (Bloch.) that also targets liver hepatocytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref16">16</xref>] . Ammonia poisoning also causes liver damage and alters the levels of these enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref17">17</xref>] . Liver is also damaged due to the effect of pollutants like bisphenol A that induces hepatotoxicity and causes severe oxidative stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref18">18</xref>] . In the present study level of various metabolic enzymes was determined after injecting a sub-lethal dose of purified tick saliva toxins in mice models. Most of these enzymes are involved in toxicity reduction and their level displays toxic effects in blood serum, liver, tissue, kidney damage and neuronal effects.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Isolation and Purification of Ticks’ Saliva Toxins</title><p>The living Rhipicephalus microplus was collected from rural areas of the Gorakhpur district. Living ticks were collected in sterilized plastic vessels and immobilized by quick freezing at −20˚C. Whole body homogenate was prepared in phosphate buffer saline (50 mm, pH 6.9) with the help of a power homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 24,000 XG at 4˚C for 30 minutes and the supernatant was used as crude saliva toxins.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Preparation of Homogenate</title><p>Rhipicephalus microplus were homogenized properly in a glass-glass homogenizer in 5 ml of different solubilizing buffers such as Triton X-100, PBS buffer (pH 6.9), 10% TCA, Tris-EDTA and absolute ethanol separately. Homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm in cold for 30 minutes and the supernatant was separated out. Total protein contents were estimated in the different supernatants according to Lowry’s (1951) method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Besides this, proteins (tissue) were solubilized in other solubilizing agents (Triton X-100, PBS, 10% TCA, and EDTA + Tris) in different combinations. Homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 XG for 30 min and proteins were estimated in supernatant according to Lowry’s (1951) method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Purification of Saliva Toxins/Proteins from Rhipicephalus microplus</title><p>Proteins were eluted on a Sepharose CL-6B-200 a double cavity gel filtration column with sintered disc filtered in the bottom having a height of 1 meter in 25 mm diameter. A known volume i.e., 5 ml of toxin proteins solubilized in PBS was loaded in the column. The flow rate was maintained between 1 ml/minute by a continuous supply of PBS buffer (pH 6.7) in a cold room. Eluted fractions were collected at a fixed time interval using a Pharmacia fraction collector and the values of protein concentration in different eluted fractions will be plotted on the graph; absorbance in each fraction was determined at 280 nm using Shimadzu spectrophotometer (UV 2001 PC). Further, the absorbance of the same fractions was taken at 640 nm after protein estimation by Lowry’s (1951) method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Elution of the Saliva Toxin Protein through Gel Filtration Column</title><p>The column was tightly held erect with a stand. Elution of the saliva toxin proteins through the gel filtration column was done at the flow rate of 5 ml/minute.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Fraction Collection</title><p>Eluted fractions of saliva protein/toxins were collected manually at a fixed time interval at a constant flow rate. Total of 140 fractions were collected. The eluted fractions were observed for the detection of the presence of saliva toxin protein at a wavelength of 280 nm. Absorbance was taken on a Shimadzu spectrophotometer (UV 2001 PC) at 640 nm after protein estimation of the eluted fraction by Lowry’s (1951) method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref19">19</xref>] . A graph was plotted between absorption at 280 nm and fraction numbers to show the elution pattern of Rhipicephalus microplus saliva toxins/proteins.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Molecular Weight Determination of Purified Saliva Toxin Proteins</title><p>The range of molecular weight of different proteins/toxins in the purified tick saliva toxins/proteins was determined by running the proteins of known molecular weight through the Sepharose CL-6B gel column as done previously at the same flow rate. A calibration curve was drawn between Ve/Vo log M between elution volume in fractions and molecular weight of different known proteins and compared with elution of proteins from Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus saliva proteins/toxins at the same flow rate and same fraction.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Lyophilization of Eluted Saliva Toxins/Proteins</title><p>The eluted fractions of saliva toxin were pooled and lyophilized to get the desired concentration of saliva toxin.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Biological Activity of the Purified Saliva Proteins/Toxins</title><p>Biological activity testing of Rhipicephalus microplus saliva protein/toxins was determined in albino mice serially known volumes of the purified saliva toxins were injected intra-peritoneal.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Determination of Lethality of Rhipicephalus microplus Toxins/Proteins</title><p>The albino mice were injected subcutaneously with the purified saliva toxin of different serial concentrations and LD<sub>50</sub> was determined at the intervals of 24 hours. Deformities such as paralysis and neurotoxic effects were also recorded. Six albino mice were injected with serial concentrations of the saliva toxin to determine LD<sub>50</sub>. Mortality was determined by using Abbot’s formula. The LD<sub>50</sub> values were calculated at which half of the test animals died. The lethal concentration for 40% and 80% of the LD<sub>50</sub> was determined with the doses-mortality regression line plotted on the log by using the Probit method (Spier, R.E. 1982) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref20">20</xref>] . The confidence limits were calculated at 95% probability levels.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Dialysis of Lyophilized Saliva Toxin</title><p>The dialysis bag of cellulose membrane was boiled for 10 min in a large volume of 2% (w/v) sodium bicarbonate and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) and then the membrane was rinsed thoroughly in distilled water. The membrane was then cooled and stored at 4˚C. The membrane was washed again with distilled water inside and outside before use. The lyophilized saliva toxin protein was filled in the dialyzing bag and dialyzed against three changes of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 6.9) to remove the excess salt from the lyophilized saliva toxin protein solution.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of Purified Rhipicephalus microplus Saliva Protein/Toxins on Certain Serum Enzymes (in Vivo)</title><p>The albino mice were injected with sub-lethal doses (40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub>) of purified Rhipicephalus microplus saliva protein/toxins. The injected mice were sacrificed at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours and 10 hours after the treatment and blood was collected to get the serum. For comparison mice treated with only PBS buffer were sacrificed and considered as control. The same method was followed for the collection of blood and isolation of serum as mentioned before.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Determination of Acid Phosphatase</title><p>Changes in acid phosphatase level were determined according to the method of Andrech and Szeypiaske, (1947) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref21">21</xref>] and modified by Bergmeyer (1967) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref22">22</xref>] . For this purpose, 0.2 ml of serum was taken in a test tube and 1.0 ml of acid buffer substrate solution (prepared by dissolving 0.41 gm citric acid, 1.125 gm sodium citrate and 165 mg p-nitrophenyl phosphate sodium salt to 100 ml of double distilled water) was added. Contents were mixed thoroughly and incubated for 30 minutes at 37˚C. Then 4.0 ml of 0.10-N NaOH solution was added to the incubated mixture. A yellow color developed which was measured at 420 nm. Standard curves were drawn with p-nitrophenol. Enzyme activity was expressed as the amount of p-nitrophenol formed/30 min/mg protein.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Determination of Alkaline Phosphatase</title><p>Changes in alkaline phosphatase levels were determined according to the method of Andrech and Szeypiaske (1947) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref21">21</xref>] , and modified by Bergmeyer (1967) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref22">22</xref>] . For this purpose, 0.10 ml of serum was taken in a test tube and added 1.0 ml of alkaline buffer substrate to it. Alkaline buffer substrate was prepared by addition of 375 mg glycine, 10 mg MgCl<sub>2</sub>&#183;6H<sub>2</sub>O and 165 mg p-nitrophenyl phosphate sodium salt in 42 ml of 0.1 N NaOH. The mixture was made up to 100 ml with double distilled water. The incubation mixture was mixed thoroughly and incubated for 30 minutes at 37˚C. 10.0 ml of 0.02 N NaOH was then added to the incubation mixture. The reaction was stopped due to excess NaOH. In reaction p-nitrophenol was formed as a result of hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl phosphate, it provided a yellow color with NaOH. Optical density was measured at 420 nm. The standard curve was drawn with the help of different concentrations of p-nitrophenol. Enzyme activity was expressed as &#181; moles of p-nitro phenol formed/30 min/mg protein.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Determination of Serum Glutamate Pyruvate Transaminase</title><p>Changes in serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) levels were measured according to the method of Reitman and Frankel (1957) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref23">23</xref>] . For this purpose 0.10 ml of non-hemolysed serum was taken and 0.50 ml of GPT substrate (0.292 gm of α-ketoglutaric acid and 17.8 gm of DL alanine was taken and added 1 N NaOH slowly with mixing until all solids were dissolved and sufficient buffer was added to adjust the pH 7.4) The buffer solution was prepared by dissolving 13.97 gm K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> and 2.69 gm KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> in 1000 ml distilled water. The contents were mixed well and incubated at 37˚C for one hour. Now 0.50 ml of 2 - 4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine solution (dissolved 0.198 gm of 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine in 1 N HCl to make 1000 ml.) was added and contents were left to stand for 15 minutes at room temperature. Then 5.0 ml of 0.4 N NaOH (1.6 gm NaOH dissolved in 100 ml distilled water) was added and mixed well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 20 minutes. The optical density was read at 505 nm setting the instrument to zero with water. The standard curve was prepared by using oxaloacetic acid as a working standard. The enzyme activity was expressed in units of glutamic-pyruvate transaminase activity/mg of serum.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Determination of Serum Glutamate Oxaloacetate Transaminase Activity</title><p>Changes in glutamic-oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT) levels were measured according to the method of Reitman and Frankel (1957) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref23">23</xref>] . For this purpose, 0.10 ml of serum was taken and 0.50 ml of GOT substrate was added to it. GOT substrate (0.292 gm of α-ketoglutaric acid and 26.6 gm of DL-aspartic acid) was taken and 1 N NaOH was added slowly with mixing until all solids were dissolved and sufficient buffer was added to adjust the pH 7.4). The buffer solution was prepared by adding 13.97 gm K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> and 2.69 gm KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> in 1000 ml distilled water. The content was mixed well and incubated at 37˚C for one hr. To this tube, 0.50 ml of 2 - 4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine solution (Dissolved 0.198 gm of 2, 4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine in 1 N HCl to make 1000 ml.) was added and kept standing for 15 minutes at room temperature. Then 5.0 ml of 0.4 N NaOH (1.6 gm NaOH dissolved in 100 ml distilled water) was added and mixed well. Contents were mixed and left for 20 minutes at room temperature. Optical density was recorded at 505 nm by setting the blank with distilled water. The standard curve was prepared by using oxaloacetic acid as the standard. Enzyme activity was expressed in units of glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase/30 min/mg protein.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Determination of Lactic Dehydrogenase</title><p>Changes in serum lactic dehydrogenase activity were measured by the method of Annon, T. M. (1984) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref24">24</xref>] . For this purpose 0.05 ml of blood serum was added to 0.50 ml of pyruvate substrate. The pyruvate substrate was prepared by mixing 10 ml of pH 7.5 pyruvate buffer (dissolved 10 gm of K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> and 0.2 gm pyruvic acid in enough water to make 1000 ml and added one drop of chloroform as preservative.) with 0.010 gm NADH<sub>2</sub>. Now the contents were incubated at 37˚C for 45 minutes. 0.50 ml of 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine solution (0.2 gm of 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine and 85 ml concentrated HCl make up the volume of 1litre with distilled water) was added and the contents of the mixture were kept at the room temperature. After 20 minutes, 5.0 ml of 0.4 N NaOH (dissolved 1.6 gm sodium hydroxide in 100 ml of distilled water) was mixed and left for 30 minutes at room temperature. The optical density was measured at 540 nm and converted to LDH unit by means of a specially prepared standard curve. Enzyme activity has been expressed as m moles of pyruvate reduced/min/mg protein.</p></sec><sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. Determination of Acetylcholinesterase</title><p>Changes in serum acetylcholinesterase (AchE) level were measured according to the method of Ellman et al., 1961 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref25">25</xref>] . For estimation of AchE, 0.05 ml of enzyme source was pipetted to a 10 mm path length cuvette. To this 0.10 ml (5 &#180; 10<sup>−4</sup> M) of freshly prepared acetylcholine thioiodide solution, 0.05 ml of DTNB reagent (chromogenic agent) and 1.45 ml of PBS (pH 6.9) were added. The changes in optical density at 412 nm were monitored regularly for three minutes at 25˚C. Enzyme activity has been expressed as μ moles “SH” hydrolysed per minute per mg protein.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Solubilization of Tick Saliva Toxins</title><p>Before isolation of tick salivary gland secreted toxins, whole body extract of ticks was prepared, was homogenized and solubilized in different solublizing buffers i.e. Triton was isolated by making homogenization of Triton X 100 (0.01%), Tris + EDTA (0.1 Mm), PBS buffer, TCA 5% and Absolute alcohol, among Triton X-100 (0.1%) was proved to be a good solubilizing agent for the Rhipicephalus microplus salivary proteins than any other solublizing buffer used. A higher protein solubilization was obtained in the supernatant than in the residue except TCA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Purification</title><p>For isolation and purification of saliva toxins adults of Ticks; Rhipicephalus microplus was homogenized in 5 mL of PBS (pH 7.2) by using a glass-glass homogenizer 5 ml solubilizing buffer. Homogenate was centrifuged in cold at 4˚C for 30 min at 15,000 rpm and the supernatant was gently isolated. It was subjected to load on a Sepharose CL-6B 200 column for separation of salivary toxins. The elution pattern of tick saliva toxins homogenate exhibited five major peaks at 280 nm. One soon after the void volume from fraction numbers three peaks 31 - 37, 38 - 47 and 50 - 60 while the fourth and fifth peaks were present 67 - 73 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Further, the concentration of tick saliva toxin was determined in each and every tube by using Lowry’s method (1951). Again, two similar protein peaks were resolved at 640 nm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The first peak was a minor one present between 50 - 60 while the second peak was a major peak and located between fraction numbers 67 - 77 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Both peaks were eluted with PBS buffer (pH 7.2). The total yield of tick saliva toxins in eluted fractions was calculated at 69.21%.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Molecular Weight Determination of Saliva Toxins</title><p>The molecular weight of Rhipicephalus microplus saliva toxins/proteins was determined by Sepharose CL6B 200 gel column chromatography using standard marker proteins of known molecular weight. The calibration curve indicates that the molecular weight of purified saliva toxins proteins ranges from 14.3 - 63 kDa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). From the calibration curve, the molecular weight of purified saliva</p><p>toxins proteins was obtained in a range of 14 - 63.0 kDa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Effect of Purified Tick Saliva Toxins on Certain Blood Serum Enzymes</title><p>Changes in the level of various serum enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glutamate, pyruvate transaminase (GPT), glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and acetylcholinesterase (AchE) were observed in albino mice after providing injections of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> at different time periods (0 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, and 8 hr,) in control groups mice were injected only with PBS buffer (pH 6.9).</p><p>Acid phosphatase level was found to be significantly (p &lt; 0.05) increased up to 136.36% and 142.30% at 4th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of ticks saliva toxins injection in comparison to control respectively. Further, it recovered 109.09% and 113.63% at the 8th hr in comparison to control respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Similarly, a significant (p &lt; 0.05) elevation in alkaline phosphatase level obtained was 125.40% and 126.61% at the 6th hr of the 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of tick saliva toxins treatment in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it was found 117.85% and 28.57% at the 8th hr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>Maximum elevation i.e. 123.35% in the level of glutamate pyruvate transaminase was found to be 123.35% at the 6th hr of 40% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> treatment while it was found 152.63% at the 4th hr of 24-h 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> of saliva toxin injection. Later on it was recorded 104.65% and 142.105% at the 8th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> treatment in comparison to control respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>Similarly, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase level significantly (p &lt; 0.05) increased up to 129.03% and 140.625% at the 6th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> treatment respectively. Further, it was recorded at 122.58% and 131.25% at the 8th hr in comparison to control respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p><p>A significant (p &lt; 0.05) increase in lactic dehydrogenase obtained in blood serum was 126.126% and 128.46% at the 6th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of ticks saliva toxins treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p><p>Contrary to this, acetylcholinesterase level was found to be decreased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 70.96% and 57.14% at the 4th hr of treatment with 40% and</p><p>80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks saliva toxins respectively. Further, it was found 80.64% and 68.57% at the 8th hr after the treatment with same dose of the saliva toxin in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0).</p><sec id="s4_4_1"><title>4.4.1. Effect of Purified Ticks Saliva Toxins on Certain Enzymes in Gastrocnemius Muscle of Albino Mice</title><p>This section deals with the effect of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> purified ticks’ saliva toxins on different enzymes in mice gastrocnemius muscle of albino mice. After the above treatment of albino mice levels of various enzymes such as acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate, pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetylcholinesterase were measured in gastrocnemius muscles at 2, 4, 6, and 8, hrs of treatment. Mice, injected only with buffer were considered as control. Following changes in enzyme level were found in gastrocnemius muscles of albino mice.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> In vivo effect of 40% of LD<sub>50</sub> purified tick saliva toxins on different enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetylcholinesterase in mice serum</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enzyme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8 hrs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.043 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.0454 (90.90)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.0216 (118.18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30 &#177; 0.0216 (136.36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.0141 (127.27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 &#177; 0.0294 (104.54)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23 &#177; 0.1202 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14 &#177; 0.0216 (93.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40 &#177; 0.0216 (114.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46 &#177; 0.029 (119.67)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53 &#177; 0.014 (125.40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46 &#177; 0.050 (119.67)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040 &#177; 0.160 (93.023)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.047 &#177; 0.00 (109.30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052 &#177; 0.00 (120.93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053 &#177; 0.02 (123.25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045 &#177; 0.03 (104.65)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 &#177; 0.0294 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.0141 (106.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.021 (106.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.068 (119.35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40 &#177; 0.021 (129.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38 &#177; 0.016 (122.58)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.43 &#177; 0.02616 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65 &#177; 0.0565 (103.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.19 &#177; 0.0163 (111.18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.69 &#177; 0.0216 (119.59)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40 &#177; 0.0216 (126.126)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.92 &#177; 0.0141 1(123.17)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AchE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031 &#177; 0.0043 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029 &#177; 0.0035 (93.54)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025 &#177; 0.0014 (80.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022 &#177; 0.0021 (70.96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024 &#177; 0.0064 (77.41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025 &#177; 0.0014 (80.64)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are mean &#177; SE of three replicates; Values in parentheses indicate per cent enzyme activity with respect to control taken as 100%; *Significant (p &lt; 0.05, Student t-test); Acid phosphatase (ACP) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): &#181; moles of p-nitrophenol formed/30minute/mg protein; Glutamate pyruvate transaminases (GPT): Units of Glutamate pyruvate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT): Units of Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Lactic dehydrogense (LDH): μ moles of pyruvate reduced/45 minute/mg protein; Acetylcholinesterase (AchE): μ moles “SH” hydrolysed/minute/mg protein.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> In vivo effect of 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> purified tick saliva toxins on different enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxalo acetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetylcholinesterase in mice serum</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enzyme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8 hrs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.0141 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.0141 (123.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.0081 (126.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.0216 (142.30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 &#177; 0.0081 (119.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.0141 (107.69)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.0282 (92.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 &#177; 0.0216 (116.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50 &#177; 0.021 (120.96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57 &#177; 0.014 (126.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49 &#177; 0.021 (120.16)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38 &#177; 0.0163 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.0216 (94.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 &#177; 0.028 (128.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58 &#177; 0.008 (152.63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56 &#177; 0.021 (147.36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54 &#177; 0.014 (142.105)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.0141 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.0374 (87.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 &#177; 0.008 (09.375)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38 &#177; 0.016 (118.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.014 (140.625)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42 &#177; 0.014 (131.25)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66 &#177; 0.0535 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.59 &#177; 0.0282 (98.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.26 &#177; 0.0282 (109.009)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.73 &#177; 0.0282 (116.06)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.26 &#177; 0.0355 (128.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.93 &#177; 0.0535 (119.06)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AchE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035 &#177; 0.0081 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031 &#177; 0.0069 (88.571)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025 &#177; 0.0141 (71.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020 &#177; 0.0021 (57.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026 &#177; 0.004 (74.285)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024 &#177; 0.0037 (68.57)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are mean &#177; SE of three replicates; Values in parentheses indicate per cent enzyme activity with respect to control taken as 100%; *Significant (p &lt; 0.05, Student t-test); Acid phosphatase (ACP) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): &#181; moles of p-nitrophenol formed/30 minute/mg protein; Glutamate pyruvate transaminases (GPT): Units of Glutamate pyruvate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT): Units of Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Lactic dehydrogense (LDH): μ moles of pyruvate reduced/45 minute/mg protein; Acetylcholinesterase (AchE): μ moles “SH” hydrolysed/minute/mg protein.</p><p>Acid phosphatase level was found to be increased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 134% and 138.23% at the 6th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of ticks saliva toxins injection in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it recovered up to 126% and 123.52% at the 8th hr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1).</p><p>While alkaline phosphatase level was found to be reduced up to 76.92% at the 6th hr of 40% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> and 52.94% at the 4th hour of 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of ticks saliva toxins injection in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it recovered up to 76.92% and 62.74% at the 8th hr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2).</p><p>In a similar treatment glutamate pyruvate transaminase level was found to be increased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 108.28% at the 4th hr of treatment with 40% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> and 117.5% at the 6th hr of treatment 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks saliva toxins treatment in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it recovered up to 103.18% and 110.625% at the 8th hr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3).</p><p>Similarly, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminases level was found to be increased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 115% at the 4th hr of treatment with 40% and 138.88% at the 6th hr of 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks’ saliva toxins compared to the control. Then, at the 8th hour it was found to be 92.5% and 122.22% at the same dose (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4).</p><p>More specifically, lactic dehydrogenase level was slightly elevated up to 101.128% and 102.19%, at the 6th hr of treatment with 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified Rhipicephalus microplus saliva protein/toxins in comparison to control. Further, no significant elevation was observed in LDH level at the 8th hr as it was found to be 99.75% and 101.10% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5).</p><p>Contrary to this, acetylcholiesterase level was found to be decreased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 48.14% at the 4th hr of treatment with 40% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> and 48% at the 6th hr of 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> purified ticks saliva toxins in comparison to control respectively. At the 8th hr, it was found to be recovered up to 51.85% and 48% at the same dose in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp;</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6).</p></sec><sec id="s4_4_2"><title>4.4.2. Effect of Purified Ticks Saliva Toxins on Certain Enzyme in Liver of Albino Mice</title><p>This section deals with the effect of purified Rhipicephalus microplus saliva proteins/toxins on different enzymes in the liver of albino mice. When mice were treated with 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks saliva toxins caused a significant elevation in the level of acid phosphatase, glutamate, pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase while the reduction in alkaline phosphatase and acetyl cholinesterase.</p><p>The acid phosphatase level was found to be elevated up to 106.57% and 112.41% at the 6th hr of the 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks’ saliva toxins injection. Later on, at the 8th hr, it was recovered to 103.28% and 108.49% respectively in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> In vivo effect of 40% of LD<sub>50</sub> purified tick saliva toxins on different enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxalo acetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetylcholinesterase in gastrocnemius</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enzyme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8 hrs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.0081 (98)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16 &#177; 0.041 (116)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31 &#177; 0.1208 (131)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34 &#177; 0.0571 (134)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26 &#177; 0.0216 (126)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 &#177; 0,041 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.0216 (92.30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69 &#177; 0.0216 (88.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66 &#177; 0.0141 (84.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58 &#177; 0.02081 (74.35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 &#177; 0.0216 (76.92)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52 &#177; 0.0141 (96.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63 &#177; 0.0216 (103.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70 &#177; 0.0216 (108.28)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68 &#177; 0.0081 (107.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1..62 &#177; 0.0081 (103.18)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.0141 (92.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44 &#177; 0.0211 (110)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#177; 0.0509 (115)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39 &#177; 0.0282 (97.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.0216 (92.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.19 &#177; 0.0015 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.66 &#177; 0.9637 (99.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.69 &#177; 0.3137 (99.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.23 &#177; 0.2336 (100.39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.55 &#177; 0.0454 (101.128)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.75 &#177; 0.1080 (99.75)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AchE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27 &#177; 0.0141 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.0216 (70.37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015 &#177; 0.0216 (55.55)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 &#177; 0.0374 (48.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.0141 (51.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.0282 (51.85)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are mean &#177; SE of three replicates; Values in parentheses indicate per cent enzyme activity with respect to control taken as 100%; *Significant (p &lt; 0.05, Student t-test); Acid phosphatase (ACP) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): &#181; moles of p-nitrophenol formed/30 minute/mg protein; Glutamate pyruvate transaminases (GPT): Units of Glutamate pyruvate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT): Units of Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Lactic dehydrogense (LDH): μ moles of pyruvate reduced/45 minute/mg protein; Acetylcholinesterase (AchE): μ moles “SH” hydrolysed/minute/mg protein.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> In vivo effect of 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> purified tick saliva toxins on different enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxalo acetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetylcholinesterase in gastrocnemius</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enzyme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8 hrs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02 &#177; 0.0141 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.0081 (96.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24 &#177; 0.0216 (121.56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 &#177; 0.0216 (126.47)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41 &#177; 0.104 (138.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26 &#177; 0.0216 (123.52)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76 &#177; 0.041 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68 &#177; 0.0081 (66.66)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 &#177; 0.0141 (65.68)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54 &#177; 0.0216 (52.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62 &#177; 0.0141 (60.78)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64 &#177; 0.0141 (62.74)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56 &#177; 0.01419 (97.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72 &#177; 0.0141 (107.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 0.0081 (111.25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 0.0141 (117.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77 &#177; 0.0244 (110.625)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34 &#177; 0.0216 (94.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#177; 0.0141 (127.77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 &#177; 0.0141 (133.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 &#177; 0.0216 (138.88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44 &#177; 0.041 (122.22)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.45 &#177; 0.8166 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.03 &#177; 0.3066 (98.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.40 &#177; 0.4598 (101.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.18 &#177; 0.0711 (101.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.46 &#177; 0.2974 (102.19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.46 &#177; 0.0294 (101.10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AchE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025 &#177; 0.0014 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021 &#177; 0.0081 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015 &#177; 0.0014 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014 &#177; 0.0282 (56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 &#177; 0.0014 (48)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 &#177; 0.0014 (48)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are mean &#177; SE of three replicates; Values in parentheses indicate per cent enzyme activity with respect to control taken as 100%; *Significant (p &lt; 0.05, Student t-test); Acid phosphatase (ACP) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): &#181; moles of p-nitrophenol formed/30 minute/mg protein; Glutamate pyruvate transaminases (GPT): Units of Glutamate pyruvate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT): Units of Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Lactic dehydrogense (LDH): μ moles of pyruvate reduced/45 minute/mg protein; Acetylcholinesterase (AchE): μ moles “SH” hydrolysed/minute/mg protein.</p><p>Alkaline phosphates level was found to be decreased significantly (p&lt; 0.05) up to 75% and 61.96% at the 6th hr of treatment with 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified Rhipicephalus microplus saliva toxins. Further, it was recovered up to 83.92% and 62.74% at the 8th hr in comparison to control respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8).</p><p>A significant (p &lt; 0.05) elevation in glutamate pyruvate transaminase observed was 115.38% and 142.028% at the 4th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of the ticks saliva toxin injection, in comparison to control respectively. It was recovered 88.46% and 126.08% at the 8th hr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9).</p><p>Similarly, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase level was found to be elevated significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 112.63% at 6th hr and 126.31% of 40% of 24-h LD<sub>50 </sub>and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks saliva toxins treatment. Later on, it recovered up to 109.20% and 123.68% at the 8th hr of the treatment in comparison to</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> In vivo effect of 40% of LD<sub>50</sub> purified tick saliva toxins on different enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxalo acetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetyl cholinesterase in liver</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enzyme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8 hrs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52 &#177; 0.0141 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43 &#177; 0.0081 (94.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48 &#177; 0.0141 (97.36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54 &#177; 0.0454 (101.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62 &#177; 0.0141 (106.57)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57 &#177; 0.0216 (103.28)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24 &#177; 0.0081 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15 &#177; 0.0141 (95.98)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11 &#177; 0.0281 (94.19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 0.0244 (83.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68 &#177; 0.0081 (75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 0.0141 (83.92)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 &#177; 0.0081 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73 &#177; 0.0081 (93.58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82 &#177; 0.0294 (105.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90 &#177; 0.0216 (115.38)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79 &#177; 0.0216 (101.28)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69 &#177; 0.029 (88.46)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.163 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10 &#177; 0.0216 (94.58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.0374 (98.88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30 &#177; 0.0216 (111.77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31 &#177; 0.0355 (112.63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27 &#177; 0.0216 (109.20)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68 &#177; 0.0081 (93.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86 &#177; 0.0509 (103.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97 &#177; 0.0216 (109.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21 &#177; 0.282 (122.77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90 &#177; 0.0216 (105.55)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AchE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 &#177; 0.0081 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028 &#177; 0.0035 (83.87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026 &#177; 0.0081 (83.87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019 &#177; 0.0026 (61.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024 &#177; 0.0028 (77.41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029 &#177; 0.0021 (93.54)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are mean &#177; SE of three replicates; Values in parentheses indicate per cent enzyme activity with respect to control taken as 100%; *Significant (p &lt; 0.05, Student t-test); Acid phosphatase (ACP) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): &#181; moles of p-nitrophenol formed/30 minute/mg protein; Glutamate pyruvate transaminases (GPT): Units of Glutamate pyruvate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT): Units of Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Lactic dehydrogense (LDH): μ moles of pyruvate reduced/45 minute/mg protein; Acetylcholinesterase (AchE): μ moles “SH” hydrolysed/minute/mg protein.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> In vivo effect of 80% of LD<sub>50</sub> purified tick saliva toxins on different enzymes i.e. acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxalo acetate transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and acetylcholinesterase in liver</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enzyme</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6 hrs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8 hrs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 &#177; 0.0571 (94.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.0216 (104.57)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.69 &#177; 0.0216 (110.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72 &#177; 0.0141 (112.41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66 &#177; 0.0141 (108.49)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55 &#177; 0.355 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17 &#177; 0.0282 (85.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92 &#177; 0.0141 (75.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84 &#177; 0.0282 (72.15)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58 &#177; 0.0081 (61.96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.0216 (62.74)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76 &#177; 0.216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69 &#177; 0.024 (110.144)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84 &#177; 0.0282 (121.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96 &#177; 0.0216 (139.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.0081 (142.028)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87 &#177; 0.122 (126.08)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14 &#177; 0.0294 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09 &#177; 0.282 (95.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26 &#177; 0.355 (110.52)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39 &#177; 0.053 (121.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 &#177; 0.0294 (126.31)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41 &#177; 0.0282 (123.68)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85 &#177; 0.0282 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74 &#177; 0.0509 (94.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93 &#177; 0.0216 (104.32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17 &#177; 0.0282 (117.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61 &#177; 0.0282 (141.081)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97 &#177; 0.0266 (106.48)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AchE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032 &#177; 0.0216 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029 &#177; 0.0028 (90.625)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.0021 (68.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019 &#177; 0.0028 (59.375)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015 &#177; 0.0049 (48.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025 &#177; 0.0028 (78.12)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are mean &#177; SE of three replicates; Values in parentheses indicate per cent enzyme activity with respect to control taken as 100%; *Significant (p &lt; 0.05, Student t-test); Acid phosphatase (ACP) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): &#181; moles of p-nitrophenol formed/30 minute/mg protein; Glutamate pyruvate transaminases (GPT): Units of Glutamate pyruvate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT): Units of Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase activity/hour/mg protein; Lactic dehydrogense (LDH): μ moles of pyruvate reduced/45 minute/mg protein; Acetylcholinesterase (AchE): μ moles “SH” hydrolysed/minute/mg protein.</p><p>control respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0).</p><p>At a similar dose of the saliva toxins lactic dehydrogenase level was found to be elevated significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 122.77% and 141.081% at the 6th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified tick saliva toxins injection in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it recovered up to 105.55% and 106.48% at the 8th hr in comparison to the control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1).</p><p>More specifically, acetylcholinesterase level was found to be decreased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 61.29% at 4th hr and 48.75% at the 6th hr of treatment with 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified ticks saliva toxins in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it improved up to 93.54% and 78.12% at the 8th hr in comparison to the control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>In the present study level of various metabolic enzymes was determined after injecting a sub-lethal dose of purified tick toxins Rhipicephalus microplus saliva toxins into the albino mice. Most of these metabolic enzymes are involved in toxicity reduction and their level displays toxic effects in blood serum, liver, tissue, kidney damage and neuronal effects. In the present investigation activity of serum acid phosphatase was increased up to 136.36% at 6th hr in comparison to the control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Similarly, the level of acid phosphatase was found to be increased up to 134% and 106.57% in gastrocnemius muscle and liver, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7). Acid phosphatase is a lysosomal enzyme that plays an important role in catabolism, pathological necrosis, autolysis and phagocytosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref26">26</xref>] . There are so many reasons for an increase in the level of acid phosphatase level. This might be due to the intoxication of liver cells and lysosomal disintegration. After cell destruction, most of the enzyme leaks out from liver and muscle cells into the circulation which results in elevation of enzyme level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref27">27</xref>] . In the present study ticks saliva toxins have significantly increased the level of serum acid phosphatase which may be due to the induction of liver ischemia and hypoxia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref28">28</xref>] . Acid phosphatase level is also increased due to bone demineralization and the generation of defective osteoclasts. It acts as a marker of bone disorders, such as Paget’s disease of bone. Metastasis of internal organs mainly glandular tissues and cells also cause a rise in acid phosphatase level.</p><p>Serum alkaline phosphatase level was found to be increased up to 125.40% at the 6th hr of the saliva toxin injection in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This elevation may be due to cytolysis. In the present study, ACP and ALP levels were also found to be increased significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 136.36% and 125.40% in vitro saliva toxin treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This elevation in ACP and ALP is due to the hemolytic activity of the saliva toxin. Contrary to this the level of ALP was found to be reduced up to 52.94% and 75% in gastrocnemius and liver muscle at the 4th and 6th hr respectively in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8). This inhibition may retard the protein synthesis in tissues and release excess free amino acids into the circulation, thereby, increasing amino acid level in the serum.</p><p>Alkaline phosphatase is an important membrane-bound enzyme found in all body tissues. It mediates the transport of metabolites across the membrane. It also plays an important role in protein synthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref29">29</xref>] . It also causes a breakdown of proteins and is found in different forms, depending on where it originates. It is also found in the liver, gall bladder and bones. The main causes of its increase are malnutrition, metastasis of the kidney, intestine and pancreas, or a serious microbial infection. Pesticides elsan induced an increase in acid phosphatase activity in the liver, kidney and intestine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref30">30</xref>] . Similarly, benzene hexachloride increased the levels of acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (42%, 2% and 18% respectively) in blood serum. These toxicants cause hepatocyte necrosis and increase liver enzyme synthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>A significant elevation was observed in serum acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase levels. Both these enzymes are detoxifying enzymes and their level increased after tissue poisoning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref32">32</xref>] . These enzymes are mainly found in the blood, liver, plasma and intestine of human beings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref34">34</xref>] . Toxins isolated from Gymnapistes marmoratus (Soldier fish) have displayed a higher level of serum acid phosphates, alkaline phosphatase and phosphodiesterase in human victims [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref35">35</xref>] . Similar, frequent elevation was noted in alkaline and acid phosphatase in Turkey hens after a dose of 1,2,4-triasole derivative (3-(2-pyridil)-4phenyl-1, 2,4-triasole-5-carboxilic acid) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>Further, GPT and GOT were also found to increase up to 108.28% and 115% in the gastrocnemius muscle at the 4th hr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3 &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4). Its level in the liver of albino mice was recorded at 115.38% (at 4th hr) and 112.63% (at 6th hr) after providing a sub-lethal injection of purified Ticks saliva toxins respectively of the control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9 &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0). Increased GPT and GOT level are due to damage to the liver, heart cells, muscle tissue, pancreas and kidney tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref15">15</xref>] . This enzyme catalyzes the reversible transfer of amino groups between an amino acid, and α-keto acids are called aminotransferase or transaminases. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref37">37</xref>] . Glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) plays a key function in carbohydrate metabolism. It catalyzes the amination of α-ketoglutarate from alanine to produce pyruvate and glutamate. This enzyme participates in cellular nitrogen metabolism and also in liver gluconeogenesis starting with precursors transported from skeletal muscles. Ingestion of Pb<sup>2+</sup> induced significant stimulation in glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (ALT) and glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase (AST) activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>Hemolysis also increases AST and ALT because of this enzyme activity in the RBCs compared to serum. GPT and GGT are expressed in hepatocytes. As well as in the liver, GOT is expressed in the myocardium, skeletal muscle, kidneys, brain, pancreas, lung, leukocytes, and erythrocytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref39">39</xref>] . These enzymes also occur in small concentrations in plasma, which may be delivered from the regular physiological shedding of cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref40">40</xref>] . Therefore, any detectable increase in their activity in plasma can be used as a reliable indicator of changes in metabolic functions and structural damage in tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref40">40</xref>] . Therefore, it functions as a link between carbohydrate and protein metabolism by catalyzing the conversion of alanine to pyruvate. Glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase are cellular metabolic enzymes with no evident function in vertebrate plasma. Thus pyruvate is utilized in the process of gluconeogenesis for glucose production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref41">41</xref>] . Tick saliva toxin caused massive cellular toxicity in liver cells and caused significant alterations in cell permeability of myocardial, liver and smooth muscle cells, which may facilitate the release of certain metabolic enzymes out of the cells into circulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Besides this, the levels of serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) was also found to be increased up to 123.35% (at 6th hr), 129.03% (at 6th hr) and 126.126% (at 6th hr) respectively in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; Figures 7-9). Elimination of glutamate through enzymatic degradation is an alternative to glutamate receptor blockade in preventing excitotoxic neuronal injury. Level of SGOT/SGPT severely altered in alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis patients. The elevation in GPT level may be due to the stress that was created after Rhipicephalus microplus saliva toxin. Therefore, saliva toxin induced stress may be the causative factor for the elevation in GPT concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref27">27</xref>] . It is evident that during stress conditions the energy requirement becomes high, which results in very high utilization of glucose and massive breakdown of stored glycogen that leads to decrease in glycogen level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref42">42</xref>] . Similarly, tick saliva exhibit pharmacological effects and causes a significant decrease in Na<sup>+</sup>-K<sup>+</sup> ATPase level and obstruct the glycogen synthesis in mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref43">43</xref>] . Similarly, Egyptian scorpion venom after administration of 100 - 400 &#181;g/kg dose of lyopholysed venom caused a significant increase in serum glucose, creatinine, glutamate pyruvate transanimase, glutamate oxaloacetate transanimase and lactic dehydrogenase level in mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><p>More specifically, lactic dehydrogenase level was slightly elevated up to 101.128% and 102.19% in gastrocnemius muscles at the 6th hr of treatment with 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified Rhipicephalus microplus saliva protein/toxins in comparison to control. Further, no significant elevation was observed in LDH level at the 8th hr as it was found to be 99.75% and 101.10% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5). At a similar dose of the saliva toxin lactic dehydrogenase level was found elevated significantly (p &lt; 0.05) up to 122.77% and 141.081% in liver at the 6th hr of 40% and 80% of 24-h LD<sub>50</sub> of purified tick saliva toxins injection in comparison to control respectively. Later on, it recovered up to 105.55% and 106.48% at the 8th hr in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1). Lactate dehydrogenase is an enzyme that is present in almost all body tissues.LDH is a cytoplasmic enzyme that is present in almost all tissues but at high concentrations in muscle, liver, and kidney. Lactic dehydrogenase is an intracellular enzyme found at high level in tissues, particularly, in liver, heart, skeletal muscle, kidney, brain and lungs. LDH exhibits five isomeric forms assembled in tetramers of either of the two types of subunits, namely muscle (M) and heart (H). This is one of the H transfer (oxidoreductase) enzymes, which catalyzes the reversible conversion of pyruvate to lactate using NADH. Basically, LDH get involved in the anaerobic metabolism of glucose when oxygen is absent or in short supply. Red blood cells also contain moderate concentrations of LDH enzyme.</p><p>It is well known that pyruvic acid is the main end product of glycolysis in those tissues, which are supplied oxygen in abundance, but in those tissues where oxygen supply is insufficient or in anaerobic state e. g. skeletal muscles lactic acid form the usual end product of glycolysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref45">45</xref>] . In such cases pyruvic acid is reduced to lactic acid under the influence of lactic dehydrogenase. The main function of lactate dehydrogenase is that either it converts excess pyruvate to lactate or regenerates pyruvate from lactate for use as a fuel or biosynthetic substrate. Normal level and utilization indicates metabolic and energetic harmony [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref46">46</xref>] . Therefore, increased level of lactic dehydrogenase in muscles and liver shows very low oxygen tension after tick saliva envenomation Thus pyruvate utilization decides level of LDH in state of no oxygen supply.</p><p>This elevated or high LDH level shows stress and hypertension and increase the rate of oxidation in animals. This is also a marker of intravascular hemolysis, reduced haptoglobin, and unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref47">47</xref>] . Increase in the level of LDH also shows massive disintegration of cells and leakage of the enzyme in to the circulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref40">40</xref>] . Besides this, increased level of LDH in muscle and liver cells shows insufficient oxygen supply. Therefore, elevation in LDH level increases the glucose catabolism for energy production especially in anaerobic condition. LDH level also increase in a state of disease, anemia, heart attack, bone fractures, muscle trauma, cancers, infection and intoxication or poisoning of body tissues.</p><p>Herbicides such as atrazine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref16">16</xref>] , ammonia poisoning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref15">15</xref>] , pollutants like bisphenol A that induce hepatotixicity and cause severe oxidative stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref18">18</xref>] Similarly para-aminophenol (PAP) cause cytotoxicity in muscles, serum and liver and increases the level of Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref12">12</xref>] . An elevation in the LDH enzyme activity in the serum correlated with a decrease in the activity of cardiac muscle LDH in all the age groups of isoproterenol-treated rats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref13">13</xref>] . Snake venom causes significant alterations in AST, LDH, glucose and urea levels, and total protein content, as well as important tissue alterations in the liver, kidneys and lungs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>On the other hand activity of serum acetylcholiesterase was found to be reduced up to 70.96% and 57.14% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). It clearly indicates binding of the saliva toxin AchE and inhibit competitively. Similarly, ticks saliva toxins inhibit the action of lactic dehydrogenase, acetylcholinesterase thrombokinase and transaminases in envenomated patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref49">49</xref>] . Thymoquinone 10 mg/kg increased the activity of plasma and blood cholinesterases and reduced DZN-induced alternations of the liver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>On the other hand activity of acetylcholiasterase was reduced 70.96% at 4th hr of the saliva toxin injection in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). It’s level in gastrocnemius and liver was also found to be decreased significantly up to 48.14% (at 4th hr) and 61.29% at (at 4th hr), respectively in comparison to control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6 &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2). It clearly indicates binding of certain saliva toxin components with this enzyme. This inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity causes accumulation of acetylcholine molecules at the synaptic junctions. This accumulation of acetylcholine may lead to prolonged activation of acetylcholine receptors and a permanent stimulation of nerves and muscle cells resulting in muscular paralysis and finally death of animal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref50">50</xref>] . Tissue poisoning and intoxication causes also affect acetyl cholinesterase activity in mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref11">11</xref>] . The cholinesterase activity was inhibited, but the activities of alkaline and acid phosphates and lactate dehydrogenase were stimulated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>Organophosphate (OP) pesticides are known as nerve agents, these are major neuroinhibitors of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. Both carbamate and organophosphate poisons decreased AChE level. Similarly, diazinon poisoning also influence acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase level in affected animals and man [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref51">51</xref>] . Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase results in accumulation of acetylcholine in the central and peripheral nervous system. This excess acetylcholine generates a predictable cholinergic syndrome consisting of copious respiratory and oral secretions, diarrhea and vomiting, sweating, altered mental status, autonomic instability, and generalized weakness that can progress to paralysis and respiratory arrest. Similarly, acetylcholinesterase enzyme (ACHE) level was found to be increased in workers’ blood of a poison-producing industry. AChE level in workers’ blood was lowered with increasing at the exposure years due to irreversible effects. It is also observed that growth at the PPE application acted as an important parameter to decline exposure to poisons and subsequently various health complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref52">52</xref>] .</p><p>Glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) plays a key function in carbohydrate metabolism. It makes a way for the delivery of skeletal muscle alanine to the liver. In skeletal muscle pyruvate is transaminated to alanine and transported to the liver. Inside liver glutamate pyruvate transaminase transfers the ammonia to the α-ketoglutarate and regenerates pyruvate. This pyruvate is then utilized in the process of gluconeogenesis for glucose production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref41">41</xref>] . Therefore, it functions as a link between carbohydrate and protein metabolism by catalyzing the conversion of alanine to pyruvate. The elevation in GPT level may be due to stress that was created after Rhipicephalus microplus toxin injection. Therefore, saliva toxin induced stress may be the causative factor for the elevation in GPT concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref27">27</xref>] . It is evident that during stress condition the energy requirement becomes high, which results in very high utilization of glucose and a massive breakdown of stored glycogen that leads to a decrease in glycogen level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref52">52</xref>] . Similarly, tick saliva exhibits pharmacological effects and causes a significant decrease in Na<sup>+</sup>-K<sup>+</sup> ATPase level and obstructs glycogen synthesis in mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref53">53</xref>] . Similarly, administration of lyophilized venom of Egyptian scorpion caused a significant increase in serum glucose, creatinine, glutamate pyruvate transaminase, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase level in mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126114-ref54">54</xref>] .</p><p>In the present study, it is clear that tick salivary toxin molecules target metabolic enzymes in blood serum, liver and muscle tissues of experimental mice. Among them, feeding inhibitors, enzyme inhibitors or inducers and strong pathogen-secreted noble antigens may be there. These molecules have an important role in catabolism, pathological necrosis, lysosomal disintegration or autolysis and phagocytosis. Tick Saliva toxins also cause liver ischemia and hypoxia and impose oxygen deficient state. Massive disintegration of glycogen inside the liver and an increase in glucose level increase the chance to catabolize glucose molecules very rapidly which leads to an increase in the production of pyruvate that renders an increase in LDH level. There are two main reasons to study tick salivary toxins, first to search for suitable inhibitors of blood feeding and second to find unique and novel protein antigens that can be used for the generation of antibodies to prohibit digestion of blood so that ticks can be deterred from feeding.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>From results, it is clear that tick saliva toxins impose toxic effects on various tissues of experimental mice. These severely cause hemolysis of RBCs, liver ischemia and hypoxia, which increased in the level of serum acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase. Both these enzymes are detoxifying enzymes and their level increased after tissue poisoning. These enzymes are mainly found in the blood, liver, plasma and intestine of human beings. Saliva toxins target membrane-bound enzymes which mediate the transport of metabolites across the membrane and play an important role in protein synthesis. Tick saliva toxins also have targeted cellular metabolic enzymes serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) found in the liver, heart cells, muscle tissue, pancreas and kidney. Alteration in levels of these enzymes displays damage to these tissues. An increased level of LDH in muscle and liver cells also displays insufficient oxygen supply and pyruvic acid is reduced to lactic acid under the influence of lactic dehydrogenase. Saliva toxin inhibited acetylcholinesterase activity that results in the accumulation of acetylcholine molecules at the synaptic junctions. This accumulation of acetylcholine may lead to prolonged activation of acetylcholine receptors and a permanent stimulation of nerves and muscle cells resulting in muscular paralysis and finally death of the animal.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Nidhi Yadav is thankful to DST for the DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/[IF190957] awarded by the Department of Science and Technology Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, wide letter dated 3rd September 2021. The authors are thankful to H.O.D., Department of Zoology for research facilities.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>Ravi Kant Upadhyay and Nidhi Yadav were responsible for conception, experiments, writing and revising the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yadav, N. and Upadhyay, R.K. (2023) Effects of Purified Indian Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus Saliva Toxins on Various Enzymes in Blood Serum, Liver and Muscles of Albino Mice. Advances in Enzyme Research, 11, 82-112. https://doi.org/10.4236/aer.2023.112005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126114-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blisnick, A.A., Simo, L., Grillon, C., Fasani, F., Brulé, S., Le Bonniec, B., Prina, E., Marsot, M., Relmy, A., Blaise-Boisseau, S., Richardson, J. and Bonnet, S.I. (2019) The Immunomodulatory Effect of IrSPI, a Tick Salivary Gland Serine Protease Inhibitor Involved in Ixodes ricinus Tick Feeding. Vaccines (Basel), 7, Article No. 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7040148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fogaca, A.C., Sousa, G., Pavanelo, D.B., Esteves, E., Martins, L.A. and Urbanová, V. (2021) Tick Immune System: What Is Known, the Interconnections, the Gaps, and the Challenges. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, Article ID: 628054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.628054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vancová, M., Bíly, T., Simo, L., et al. (2020) Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Feeding Apparatus of the Tick Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae): A New Insight into the Mechanism of Blood-Feeding. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56811-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perveen, N., Muzaffar, S.B. and Al-Deeb, M.A. (2021) Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases of Livestock in the Middle East and North Africa: A Review. Insects, 2, Article No. 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obaid, M.K., Islam, N., Alouffi, A., Khan, A.Z., da Silva Vaz, I., Tanaka, T. and Ali, A. (2022) Acaricides Resistance in Ticks: Selection, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, and Mitigation. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 12, Article ID: 941831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.941831</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hrnková, J., Schneiderová, I., Golovchenko, M., Grubhoffer, L., Rudenko, N. and Cerny, J. (2021) Role of Zoo-Housed Animals in the Ecology of Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens—A Review. Pathogens, 10, Article No. 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feng, L.L., Liu, L. and Cheng, T.Y. (2019) Proteomic Analysis of Saliva from Partially and Fully Engorged Adult Female Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 78, 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00390-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galay, R.L., Umemiya-Shirafuji, R., Bacolod, E.T., Maeda, H., Kusakisako, K., Koyama, J., Tsuji, N., Mochizuki, M., Fujisaki, K. and Tanaka, T. (2014) Two Kinds of Ferritin Protect Ixodid Ticks from Iron Overload and Consequent Oxidative Stress. PLOS ONE, 9, e90661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, O., Sojka, D., Kopacek, P., Buresova, V., Franta, Z., Sauman, I., Winzerling, J. and Grubhoffer, L. (2009) Knockdown of Proteins Involved in Iron Metabolism Limits Tick Reproduction and Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1033-1038. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807961106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chmelar, J., Kotál, J., Kovaríková, A. and Kotsyfakis, M. (2019) The Use of Tick Salivary Proteins as Novel Therapeutics. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, Article No. 812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calic, M., Vrdoljak, A.L., Radic, B., Jelic, D., Jun, D., Kuca, K., Kovarik, Z. (2006) In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Pyridinium Oximes: Mode of Interaction with Acetylcholinesterase, Effect on Tabun- and Soman-Poisoned Mice and Their Cytotoxicity. Toxicology, 219, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.11.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kendig, D.M. and Tarloff, J.B. (2007) Inactivation of Lactate Dehydrogenase by Several Chemicals: Implications for in Vitro Toxicology Studies. Toxicology in Vitro, 21, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2006.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asha, S. and Radha, E. (1985) Effect of Age and Myocardial Infarction on Serum and Heart Lactic Dehydrogenase. Experimental Gerontology, 20, 67-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0531-5565(85)90010-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Danaei, G.H., Amali, A., Karami, M., Khorrami, M.B., Riahi-Zanjani, B. and Sadeghi, M. (2022) The Significance of Thymoquinone Administration on Liver Toxicity of Diazinon and Cholinesterase Activity; a Recommendation for Prophylaxis among Individuals at Risk. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 22, Article No. 321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-022-03806-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, X.J., Choi, Y.K., Im, H.S., Yarimaga, O., Yoon, E. and Kim, H.S. (2006) Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST/GOT) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT/GPT) Detection Techniques. Sensors (Basel), 6, 756-782. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6070756</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwani, C.D., Lakra, W.S., Nagpure, N.S., Kumar, R., Kushwaha, B. and Srivastava, S.K. (2010) Toxicity of the Herbicide Atrazine: Effects on Lipid Peroxidation and Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes in the Freshwater Fish Channa punctatus (Bloch). International Journal of Environmental Research Public and Health, 7, 3298-3312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7083298</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, X., Li, P., Ding, Q., Wu, C., Zhang, W. and Tang, B. (2019) Observation of Acetylcholinesterase in Stress-Induced Depression Phenotypes by Two-Photon Fluorescence Imaging in the Mouse Brain. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 141, 2061-2068. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b11414</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kourouma, A., Quan, C., Duan, P., Qi, S.Q., Yu, T.T., Wang, Y.N. and Yang, K.D. (2015) Bisphenol A Induces Apoptosis in Liver Cells through Induction of ROS. Advances in Toxicology, 2015, Article ID: 901983. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/901983</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowry, O.H., Rosenburgh, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951) Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spier, R.E. (1982) The Confidence Limits Were Calculated at 95% Probability Levels. Spier, R.E. 1982Gel Filtration Column, Animal Cell Technology: An Overview. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 32, 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5030320134</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrech and Szeypiaske, A.J. (1947) Use of p-Nitrophenylphosphate as the Substrate in Determination of Serum Acid Phosphatase. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 17, 571-574. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/17.7_ts.571</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bergmeyer, U.H. (1967) Determination of Alkaline Phophatase and Acid Phosphatase. Academic Press, New York, 1129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reitman, A. and Frankel, S. (1957) A Colorimetric Method for the Determination of Glutamate-Oxaloacetate and Serum Glutamate-Pyruvate Transaminase. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 28, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/28.1.56</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ellman, G.L., Courtney, K.D., Andres, V. and Featherstone, R.M. (1961) A New and Rapid Colorimetric Determination of Acetylcholinesterase Activity. Biochemical Pharmacology, 7, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Annon, T.M. (1984) Sigma Diagnostic: Lactate Dehydrogenase (Quantitative, Colorimeteric Determination in Serum, Urine and Cerebrospinal Fluid) at 400-500 nm. Procedure No. 500.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abou-Donia, M.B. (1978) Increase in Acid Phosphatase Activity in Hens Following an Oral Dose of Leptophos. Toxicology Letters, 2, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(78)90067-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouck, G.R. (1966) Changes in Blood and Muscle Composition of Rock Bass (Ambloplites rupestris) as Physiological Criteria of Stressful Conditions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abraham, R., Goldberg, L. and Grasso, P. (1967) Hepatic Response to Lysosomal Effects of Hypoxia, Natural Red and Chloroquine. Nature, 215, 195-196. https://doi.org/10.1038/215194a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pillo, B., Ansani, M.V. and Shah, R.V. (1972) Studies on Wound Healing and Repair in Pigeon Liver II: Histochemical Studies on Acid and Alkaline Phosphatase during the Process. The Journal of Animal Morphology and Physiology, 19, 205-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.N. and Tahira, S. (2003) Pesticide-Induced Changes in Serum Levels of Acid Phosphatase, Alkaline Phosphates and Glutamate Oxaloacetate Transaminase in Rats. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6, 359-362. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.359.362</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saigal, S., Bhatnagar, V.K. and Malviya, A.N. (1982) Effect of Selected Pesticides on Alkaline and Acid Phosphatase in the Rat. Toxicology Letters, 12, 177-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(82)90182-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srinivas, R., Udikeri, S.S., Jayalakshmi, S.K. and Sreeramulu, K. (2004) Identification of Factors Responsible for Insecticide Resistance in Helicoverpa Armigera. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol, 137, 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2004.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffrezic-Renault, N. (2001) New Trends in Biosensor for Organophosphorus Pesticides. Sensors, 1, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.3390/s10100060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lusková, V., Svoboda, M. and Koláfiová, J. (2002) The Effect of Diazinon on Blood Plasma Biochemistry in Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Acta Veterinaria Brno, 71, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271010117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hopkins, B.J. and Hodgson, W.C. (1998) Enzyme and Biochemical Studies of Stonefish (Synanceja trachynis) and Soldierfish (Gymnapistes marmoratus) Venoms. Toxicon, 36, 791-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(97)00167-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krauze, M., Truchlinski, J. and Cendrowaka-Pinkosz, M. (2007) Some Biochemical Parameters of Plasma of Turkey-Hens Following Administration of 1,2,4-Triasole Derivative. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 10, 109-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vaillant, A. (2021) Transaminase Elevations during Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: Safety Considerations and Role in Achieving Functional Cure. Viruses, 13, Article No. 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, N.M., Eweis, E.A., El-Beltagi, H.S. and Abdel-Mobdy, Y.E. (2012) Effect of Lead Acetate Toxicity on Experimental Male Albino Rat. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60187-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nelson, D.L. and Cox, M.M. (2000) Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. 3rd Edition, Worth Publishers, New York, 628-631.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Schmidt, E. and Schmidt, F.W. (1974) The Importance of Enzymatic Analysis in Medicine. In: Bergmeyer, H.U., Ed., Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 6-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krajnovic-Ozretic, M. and Ozretic, B. (1987) Estimation of the Enzymes LDH, GOT, and GPT in Plasma of Grey Mullet, Mugil auratus and Their Significance in Liver Intoxication. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 3, 187-193. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao003187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lehninger, A.L., Cox, M.M. and Nelson, D.L. (2000) Principles of Biochemistry. 2nd Edition, Worth Publishers, New York, 633.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lehninger, A.L., Cox, M.M. and Nelson, D.L. (2000) Principles of Biochemistry. 2nd Edition, Worth Publishers, New York, 542.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cuppolatti, J. and Abbott, A.J. (1990) Interaction of Melittin with the (Na+ + K+) ATPase: Evidence for a Melittin-Induced Conformational Changes. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 283, 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(90)90639-G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Omran, M.A. and Abdel-Rahman, M.S. (1992) Effect of Scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus (H&amp;E) Venom on the Clinical Chemistry Parameters of the Rat. Toxicology Letters, 61, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(92)90068-U</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murthy, K. and Haghanazari, L. (1999) The Blood Level of Glucagons, Cortisol and Insulin Following the Injection of Venom by the Scorpion (mesobuthus tamulus concanesis, Pocock) in Dogs. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins, 5, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-79301999000200004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prochownik, E.V. and Wang, H. (2021) The Metabolic Fates of Pyruvate in Normal and Neoplastic Cells. Cells, 10, Article No. 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040762</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barcellini, W. and Fattizzo, B. (2015) Clinical Applications of Hemolytic Markers in the Differential Diagnosis and Management of Hemolytic Anemia. Disease Markers, 2015, Article ID: 635670. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/635670</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betten, D.P., Richardson, W.H., Tong, T.C. and Clark, R.F. (2006) Massive Honeybee Envenomation-Induced Rhabdomyolysis in an Adolescent. Pediatrics, 117, 231-235. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fischer, E.H., HeilMeyer, L.M.G. and Hashcke, R.H. (1971) Phosphorylase and the Control of Glycogen Degradation. Current Topics in Cellular Regulation, 4, 211-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-152804-1.50012-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeni, A.L.B., Becker, A., Krug, M. and Albuquerque, C.A.C. (2007) Histological and Biochemical Effects Induced by Sublethal Doses of Bothrops jararacussu Venom in Mice. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, 13, 664-676. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992007000300009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lessenger, J.E. and Reese, B.E. (1999) Rational Use of Cholinesterase Activity Testing in Pesticide Poisoning. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 12, 307-314. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.12.4.307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salari, M., Rahimi, J., Moradnia, M., Tarin, Z., Darvishmotevalli, M., Eslami, F., Shabanloo, A., Avval, M.Y. and Karimi, H. (2019) Evaluation of the Relation of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme Level of the Worker of a Poison-Producing Industry with the Application of Personal Protective Equipment and the Amount of Poison Production within 2012-2015. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijehe.ijehe_7_18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126114-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lutovac, M., Popova, O.V., Jovanovic, Z., Berisa, H., Kristina, R., Ketin, S. and Bojic, M. (2017) Management, Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Acetylcholinesterase as a Biomarker of the Toxic Effects of Pesticides in People Occupationally Exposed. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 5, 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2017.200</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>