<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2023.146027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-126046</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Diametric Structure of One Fragment of One Deciduous Seasonal Forest in Brazilian Savanna Eco Museum
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Imaña-Encinas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Otacílio</surname><given-names>Antunes Santana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Forestry, University of Bras&amp;amp;iacute;lia, Bras&amp;amp;iacute;lia, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biof&amp;amp;iacute;sic and Radiobiology, Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>470</fpage><lpage>480</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A 10 ha deciduous seasonal forest fragment (15&#176;45'54''S and 49&#176;04'03''W) found in the bioregion of the Savanna Eco Museum localized in the state of Goi&#225;s, Brazil was studied. For the phytosociological survey, 10 sample plots of 20 &#215; 20 m were systematically located. All living trees of 5 cm 
  DBH and above were measured with the plot boundaries. There were 742 individuals belonging to 83 species and 38 families. The richest families in terms of the number of species were Leguminosae, Rubiaceae, Myrtaceae, Apocynaceae and Chrisobalanaceae, which contributed 48% of the total species. The species with the highest importance value indices (
  IVI) were 
  Tapira quianensis (Aubl.), 
  Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) March., 
  Callisthene mayor (Mart.), 
  Amaioua guianensis (Aubl.) and 
  Anadenanthera macrocarpa (Benth.) Brenan. The Shannon diversity index was 3.80 nats/individuals and the Pielou equality index was 0.86 for the total population. 549 sampled trees had 
  DBH values lower than 30 cm. This indicates that this forest has a high potential for natural succession. Two 
  DBH distributions were observed: the typical reverse “J”, described frequently in the literature, and a nearly Gaussian distribution.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Native Tree Species</kwd><kwd> Diametric Distribution</kwd><kwd> Phytosociological Survey</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The geographical area of the Savanna Eco Museum is located mainly in the municipal district of Piren&#243;polis in the state of Goi&#225;s adjacent to the Federal District, occupying an area of 8.066 km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref2">2</xref>] , as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Diameter distributions are important tools in forest management planning, for both researchers and forest administrators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref5">5</xref>] . It’s mentioned that the diameter distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref6">6</xref>] enables the interpretation of plant species population dynamics, towards consistent decisions on possible silvicultural interventions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref9">9</xref>] . The Savanna Eco Museum has been idealized to contribute to the environmental conservation of the Paran&#225; and Tocantins rivers’ watershed region.</p><p>The natural vegetation of the Eco Museum area presents the plant communities of the well-defined savanna biome. The communities include typical savanna, and two other tree communities: gallery forests associated with watercourses, and the interfluve, forests which are not associated with watercourses. The deciduous woodlands occur on very steep slopes and it is deciduous during the dry season.</p><p>Floristic, phytosociological [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref27">27</xref>] and dendrometric studies can be conducted in these plant communities to provide relevant and important information and knowledge for the conservation of the remaining forests. Referring to the levels of biological diversity, from 4444 km<sup>2</sup> (total) of the Savanna Eco Museum, only the north of the Piren&#243;polis county has 1058 km<sup>2</sup>, which is inferred as priority areas of biodiversity at level 1, equivalent to extremely high [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref2">2</xref>] . Priority areas at level 2 (high) are in the counties of Abad&#226;nia, Alex&#226;nia, and southern region of Piren&#243;polis, making up a total of 2484 km<sup>2</sup>. At level 3 (lower) they occur in the counties of &#193;guas Lindas de Goi&#225;s, Cocalzinho de Goi&#225;s and Santo Ant&#244;nio do Descoberto, corresponding to 902 km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The aim of this study was to do a diametric survey of the tree component of one deciduous forest stand in this Savanna Eco Museum.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials</title><p>The study area included a fragment of the deciduous forest in the northwestern portion of the Savanna Eco Museum on the Raio de Sol Farm (15˚45'54''S, 49˚04'03''W, at an altitude of 810 m) covers an area of 12.5 ha. It occurs on a steep slope of 32˚ adjacent to riparian forests and a typical savanna within a permanent preservation area. The soils are shallow, well-drained and have low natural fertility. The area has the AW-type local climate according to the K&#246;ppen-Geiger climate classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref11">11</xref>] , with two well-defined seasons: dry winter (March to June) and rainy summer (July to February), with an average annual rainfall of 1,500 mm.</p><p>Two transects 200 m in width and 80 m apart were systematically demarcated along the slope. In each transect five plots of 20 &#215; 20 m (0.04 ha) were sampled at 80 m intervals along each transect, i.e. total coverage of 0.2 ha, with a total sample area of 0.4 ha. The data from the same plots were used for the phytosociological analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref1">1</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methods</title><p>All live trees, including the palm trees, of ≥5 cm DBH (diameter at breast height) were measured with an 80 cm caliper. The species were identified in the field by a tree specialist. When it was not possible, the material was dried and pressed for identification at the Brasilia University Herbarium (UB). The trees were identified to the level of species, genera and family according to the APG III system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref12">12</xref>] . The vegetation stems diameter structure was analyzed using 2.5 cm stem diameter class intervals. Diameter class histograms were developed for the whole community and the 25 species with higher importance value index (IVI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref15">15</xref>] , as they cumulatively contribute 70% of the IVI. The IVI was following calculated: the sum of the relative&#180;s frequency, density and dominance divided into three.</p><p>The Liocourt quotient “q” to identifies if the tree component of the plant community is balanced, i.e. when an almost uniform “q” ratio occurs. It was calculated by dividing the number of individual stems of a diameter class by the number of individuals of the previous class. This calculation can also be done using basal area values, once every management system considers this dendrometric parameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The model Y j = e β 0 + β 1 ⋅ D j [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref20">20</xref>] was used to adjust the number of individual trees present in the plots per center diameter class, where: Y<sub>j</sub> estimates the number of trees per hectare; β<sub>0</sub> and β<sub>1</sub>, are the equation parameters; D<sub>j</sub>, the center diameter class; and e, the Napierian logarithm base, also was used the Neural Networks Method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref21">21</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>All native tree species were identified (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and distributed in 42 families. The families [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref12">12</xref>] with the highest number of species were: Leguminosae with 11 species; Caesalpinaceae and Myrtaceae with five species each; and Rubiaceae, Melastomataceae, Apocynaceae and Annonaceae with four species each; this all representing 42% of sampling species.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Floristic composition and tree parameters in a deciduous forest stand at the Savanna Eco Museum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref12">12</xref>] , species ordered by families using the IVI = index importance value</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family/species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stems</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stems∙ha<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DBH range cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean DBH cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Basal area m<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IVI*</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anacardiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tapirira guianensis (Aubl.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4 - 37.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0991</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.13 (01)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Burseraceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protium heptaphyllum (Aubl.) Marchand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1 - 21.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.24 (02)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vochysiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Callisthene major (Mart.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2 - 20.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.88 (03)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualea dichotoma (Mart.) Warm.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 - 16.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.50 (15)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rubiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(106)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alibertia macrophylla K. Schum.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 - 16.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.26 (11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amaioua guianensis (Aubl.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1 - 19.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.53 (04)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guettarda viburnoides Cham. &amp; Schltdl.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0 - 10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.62 (13)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leguminosae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(47)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anadenanthera macrocarpa (Benth.) Brenan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8 - 30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62 (05)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chrysobalanaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(55)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Licania octandra (Hoff. ex Roem. &amp; Shult.) Kuntze</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4 - 16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.38 (06)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apocynaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspidosperma subincanum (Mart.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6 - 33.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.22 (07)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malvaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Luehea divaricata Mart. &amp; Zucc.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 - 20.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.95 (08)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tabebuia ochracea (Cham.) Standl.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 - 19.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85 (12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annonaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylopia aromatica (Lam.) Mart.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3 - 21.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.87 (09)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myrtaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myrcia multiflora (Lam.) DC.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2 - 12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0. 0064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.66 (10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malpighiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Byrsonima intermedia A. Juss.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1 - 17.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.61 (14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indiv&#237;duos n&#227;o identificados</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8 - 17.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >… (33 families with lowest IVI)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total (all species)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1855</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0971</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Value between brackets indicates numerical order (highest to lowest) of species by the Importance Value Index.</p><p>826 stems from 1,855 are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the others stems were distributed in the other families. The stem diameter distribution of the individuals total showed a positive structure of the forest, like <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, once there is a possibility of natural replacement of dead trees from higher diameter classes by the recruitment of abundant individuals from lower diameter classes.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the diameter distribution, it is to observe that the Meyer equation has a R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99.</p><p>The highest number of species distributed in many families corroborated with other phytosociological studies carried out in the savanna region (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Data from absolute density (DA) and basal area (G) fit themselves close to results found in other seasonal forests. The minimum diameter was in all studies 5 cm.</p><p>According to the Liocourt quotient [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref17">17</xref>] as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> it is verified that the plant community studied tends to be balanced once the numeric value of the calculated ratio per diameter class presents itself in a relatively small interval “q” varying from 0.25 to 0.48. The calculated value varied respectively between 0.12 and 0.11 to the highest and lowest value of the calculated mean (0.36). The Liocourt quotient calculated by the diameter class (a) and basal area (b) also indicated the existence of a balance in the community studied. The low variations in the calculated index show correspondent individuals recruitment between the diameter classes due to a possible mortality tax.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Tree density and basal area of some seasonal forests</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locality</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DA n∙ha<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >G m<sup>2</sup>∙ha<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Itatinga, S&#227;o Paulo state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ivanauskas et al., 1999 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vale do A&#231;o, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lopes et al., 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lavras, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1487</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Souza et al., 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monte Alegre, Goi&#225;s state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nascimento et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lavras, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machado et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref26">26</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lavras, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2565</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oliveira et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref27">27</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&#227;o Domingos, Goi&#225;s state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silva &amp; Scariot, 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref29">29</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vi&#231;osa, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2786</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silva et al., 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bom Sucesso, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apolin&#225;rio et al., 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vi&#231;osa, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Campos et al., 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref6">6</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uberl&#226;ndia, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salles &amp; Schiavini, 2007 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref28">28</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uberaba, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >805</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dias Neto et al., 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref38">38</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ipia&#231;u, Minas Gerais state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >837</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gusson et al., 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref32">32</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ourana, Goi&#225;s state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1647</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soares et al., 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref33">33</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Montes Claros, Goi&#225;s state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soares et al., 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref33">33</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Piren&#243;polis, Goi&#225;s state</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1855</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In this study</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DA = absolute density; G = basal area.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Tree distribution in 5 cm DBH class</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter class cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DCmp cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute density n<sub>i</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Relative density %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average basal area m<sup>2</sup>∙ha<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >“q” (a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >“q” (b)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 - 10.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.01 - 15.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.01 - 20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.01 - 25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.01 - 30.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.01 - 35.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.01 - 40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DCmp = diameter class mean point. (a) = obtained by the number of individuals per class ratio. (b) = obtained by the basal area per class ratio.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>The diameter structure reveals that the arboreal community is mainly composed of small trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref35">35</xref>] . The J-inverse pattern with 96% of the trees in the first three diameter classes indicates apparently a positive balance between recruitment and mortality until the 20 - 25 diameter class. Which would characterize the forest as self-regenerative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref22">22</xref>] . In other words, the size structure of the plant community is a result of biotic and abiotic factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref36">36</xref>] and a strong variation genetic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The ten most important families from the phytosociological point of view correspond to more than 60% of the area’s IVI. The family with the highest number of individuals in the area studied was Rubiaceae and the one that dominated in terms of richness was Leguminosae with eleven species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref37">37</xref>] . In one forest in the Philippines to find the relation between the plant community's ecological suitability and the social preference, they found a strong negative relationship.</p><p>In relation to the species, the dendrometric analysis considered the top 25 IVI positions. It is observed that most parts of DBHs encounter themselves at lower diameter classes until 25 cm. The numbers in parentheses above the species’ names refer to the corresponding number of individuals sampled.</p><p>Analyzing each species diameter structure, it was verified [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref12">12</xref>] that the species Tapira guianensis, Protium heptaphyllum, Amaioua guianensis, Aspidosperma subincanum, Myrcia multiflora, Tabebuia ochracea, Guettarda pohliana, Guettarda virbunoides, Byrsonima intermedia, Sclerolobium paniculatum, Tapura amazonica, Curatella americana, Luehea divaricata, Licania apetala and Erythroxylum daphnites presented a more regular distribution, with a tendency curve similar to the J-inverse species distribution corresponds to 60% of the 25 ones with higher IVI. The species that presented a completely irregular distribution were Callisthene major, Anadenanthera macrocarpa, Xylopia aromatica, Astronium fraxinifolium, Licania octandra, Alibertia macrophylla, Qualea dichotoma, Salacia amygdalina, Emmotum nitens and Virola sebifera, completing 40% of the 25 species considered. Once most part of the DBHs belongs to lower value diameter classes, it is assumed that the remaining trees could hardly reach high diameters possibly because of those species’ inherent characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>The diameter distribution per plot was fit by Meyer’s equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref35">35</xref>] . The corresponding equation’s coefficients the estimated deviation pattern (S<sub>yx</sub>) and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) are indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Because of the high value of the coefficient of determination and the low value of the estimative deviation pattern the corresponding equations are fully adjusted to the existing DBHs in the arboreal plant community. It is observed that on the 10 plots, the diameter distribution curve shows a negative exponential tendency. It is verified the existence of a balance between high regeneration and high mortality, according to descriptions provided by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref36">36</xref>] in deciduous seasonal forests.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Coefficient and statistic parameters for the Meyer’s equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126046-ref21">21</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plot</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >β<sub>0</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >β<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>yx</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1751</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1504</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1640</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1629</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2024</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1747</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2089</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1979</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0203</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1503</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The DBH average of 10.64 cm and the average basal area of 20.08 m<sup>2</sup>∙ha<sup>−1</sup> are fully compatible with values found for other deciduous seasonal forests.</p><p>The diametric distribution of the 742 arboreal individuals across 7 diameter classes revealed a plant community composed mainly of small trees; 96% of them presented DBH less than 25 cm with a positive balance between recruitment and mortality in the first classes which characterizes it as self-regenerative.</p><p>The tree with the highest DBH (37.7 cm) was the species Tapirira guianensis.</p><p>The Liocourt quotient “q” showed that the arboreal plant community studied is balanced.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We appreciate the Brazilian CNPq for the financial support while without it this research would not have been possible.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ima&#241;a-Encinas, J. and Santana, O.A. (2023) Diametric Structure of One Fragment of One Deciduous Seasonal Forest in Brazilian Savanna Eco Museum. Journal of Environmental Protection, 14, 470-480. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2023.146027</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126046-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ima&amp;ntilde;a-Encinas, J., de Macedo, L.A. and de Paula, J.E. (2007) Flor&amp;iacute;stica e fitossociologia de um trecho da floresta estacional semidecidual na &amp;aacute;rea do Ecomuseu do Cerrado, em Piren&amp;oacute;polis—Goi&amp;aacute;s. Cerne (Brasil), 13, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v3i3a362</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ima&amp;ntilde;a-Encinas, J., da N&amp;oacute;brega, R.C. and Matricardi, E.A.T. (2012) Georeferenciamento de &amp;aacute;reas priorit&amp;aacute;rias para a conserva&amp;atilde;o da biodiversidade na regi&amp;atilde;o de Eco Museu do Cerrado—GO. Enciclop&amp;eacute;dia da Biosfera (Goiania, Brasil), 8, 2148-2150. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/16215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima, R.B., Bufalino, L., Alves Junior, F., Silva, J.A.A. and Ferreira, R.C. (2017) Diameter Distribution in a Brazilian Tropical Forest Domain Prediction for the Stand and Species. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ci&amp;ecirc;ncias, 89, 1189-1203. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160331</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siminski, A., Mantovani, M., Reis, M.S. and Fantini, A.C. (2004) Sucess&amp;atilde;o florestal secund&amp;aacute;ria no munic&amp;iacute;pio de S&amp;atilde;o Pedro de Alc&amp;acirc;ntara, litoral de Santa Catarina: Estrutura e diversidade. Ci&amp;ecirc;ncia Florestal (Santa Maria, Brasil), 14, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050981778</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aigbe, H.I. (2014) Modeling Diameter Distribution of the Tropical Rainforest in Oban Forest Reserve. Journal of Environment and Ecology, 5, 130-143. https://doi.org/10.5296/jee.v5i2.6559</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campos, E.P., da Silva, A.F., Meira Neto, J.A.A. and Martins, S.V. (2006) Flor&amp;iacute;stica e estrutura horizontal da vegeta&amp;atilde;o arb&amp;oacute;rea de uma ravine em um fragmento florestal no munic&amp;iacute;pio de Viosa, MG. &amp;Aacute;rvore (Vicosa, Brasil), 30, 1045-1054. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622006000600021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, I.R.C., Morais, V.M.C., Emmert, F. and Mendes Nascimento, R.G. (2021) Size, Ecology, and Seasonality Affect the Monthly Diametric Growth of Trees in a Secondary Forest. Floresta e Ambiente (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil), 1, 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2021-0009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandes-Rodrigues, A.A. (2015) Sistemas de manejo irregular, manejo incoetaneo. Tecnol&amp;oacute;gico Nacional de M&amp;eacute;xico, Instituto Tecnol&amp;oacute;gico del Valle de Oaxaca. Trabajo de Graduaci&amp;oacute;n en Ingenieria Forestal, 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nepomuceno, A.V., Souza, E.B., Zappi, D.C., Moreira, M.C., Nepomuceno, F.A.A. and Moro, M.F. (2021) Savannas of the Brazilian Semiarid Region: What Do We Learn from Floristics? Acta Bot&amp;acirc;nica Brasilica, 35, 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062020abb0259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gillespie, T.W., Lipkin, B., Sullivan, L., Benowitz, D.R., Pau, S. and Keppel, G. (2012) The Rarest and Least Protected Forests in Biodiversity Hotspots. Biodiversity Conservation (UK), 21, 3597-3611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0384-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K&amp;ouml;ppen, W. (1936) Das geographische System der Klimate. 1-44, Berlin (Germany) Gebrüder Borntraeger Present and future K&amp;ouml;ppen-Geiger Climate Classification Maps at 1-km Resolution.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (2009) An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG III. Botanic Journal Linnean Society. New York (USA), 161, 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Queiroz, W.T., Silva, M.L., Jardim, F.C.S., Vale, R., Valente, M.D.R. and Pinheiro, J. (2017) índice de valor de import&amp;acirc;ncia de esp&amp;eacute;cies arb&amp;oacute;reas da Floresta Nacional do Tapaj&amp;oacute;s via an&amp;aacute;lises de componentes principais e de fatores. Ci&amp;ecirc;ncia Florestal (Santa Maria, Brasil), 27, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509826446https://www.scielo.br/j/cflo/a/sZNSF9TGdCz3rQ4M4FQ5Bvt/?format=pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajayi, S. and Obi, R.L. (2016) Tree Species Composition, Structure and Importance Value Index (IVI) of Okwangwo Division, Cross River National Park, Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Research, 5, 86-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Narayan</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Diversity Indices and Importance Values of a Tropical Deciduous Forest on Chhotanagpur Plateau, India</article-title><source> Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 358</fpage>-<lpage>367</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hess, A.F., Calgarotto, A.R., Pinheiro, R. and Wanginiak, T.C.R. (2010) Proposta de manejo de Araucaria angustifolia utilizando o quociente de Liocourt e an&amp;aacute;lise de incremento, em propriedade rural no munic&amp;iacute;pio de Lages, SC. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Colombo, Brasil), 30, 337-345. https://doi.org/10.4336/2010.pfb.30.64.337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alves J&amp;uacute;nior, F.T., Ferreira, R.L.C., Silva, J.A.A., Marangon, L.C., Costa J&amp;uacute;nior, R.F. and Silva, S.O. (2010) Utiliza&amp;atilde;o do quociente de De Liocourt na avalia&amp;atilde;o da distribui&amp;atilde;o diam&amp;eacute;trica em fragmentos de Floresta Ombr&amp;oacute;fila Aberta em Pernambuco. Ci&amp;ecirc;ncia Florestal (Santa Maria, Brasil), 20, 307-319. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050981854</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nascimento, A.R.T., Felfili, J.M. and Meirelles, E.M. (2004) Florística e estrutura da comunidade arbórea de um remanescente de floresta estacional decidual de encosta, munic&amp;iacute;pio de Monte Alegre, GO, Brasil. Acta Bot&amp;acirc;nica Brasilica, 18, 663-674.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oluwajuwon, T., Attafuah, R., Offiah, C. and Krabel, D. (2022) Genetic Variation in Tropical Tree Species and Plantations: A Review. Open Journal of Forestry, 12, 350-366. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2022.123019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordero, R. (2022) Community Tree Species Preferences in Zambales, Philippines. Open Journal of Ecology, 12, 629-637. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2022.1210036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daimantopoulou, M.J., &amp;Ouml;zcelik, R., Crecente-Campo, F. and Andeler, &amp;Uuml;. (2015) Estimation of Weibull Function Parameters for Modelling Tree Diameter Distribution Using Least Squares and Artificial Neural Networks Methods. Biosystem Engineering, 133, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.02.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, N.R.S., Martins, S.V. and Meira Neto, J.A.A. (2004) Composi&amp;atilde;o flor&amp;iacute;stica e estrutura de uma floresta estacional semidecidual montana em Viosa, MG. &amp;Aacute;rvore (Brasil), 28, 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622004000300011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Apolin&amp;aacute;rio, V., Oliveira Filho, A.T. and Guilherme, F.A.G. (2005) Tree Population and Community Dynamics in a Brazilian Tropical Semideciduous Forest. Revista Brasileira de Bot&amp;acirc;nica, 28, 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042005000200014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ivanauskas, N.M., Rodrigues, R.R. and Nave, A.G. (1999) Fitossociologia de um trecho de floresta estacional semidecidual em Itatinga, S&amp;atilde;o Paulo, Brasil. Scientia Forestalis (Piracicaba, Brasil), 56, 83-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lopes, P.W., Silva, A.F., Souza, A.L. and Meira-Neto, J.A.A. (2002) Estrutura fitossociol&amp;oacute;gica de um trecho de vegeta&amp;atilde;o arb&amp;oacute;rea no Parque Estadual do Rio Doce-Minas Gerais, Brasil. Acta Bot&amp;acirc;nica Bras&amp;iacute;lica (Brasil), 16, 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062002000400007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Machado, E.L.M., Oliveira Filho, A.T., Carvalho, W.A., Souya, J.S., Bor&amp;eacute;m, R.A.T. and Bortezelli, L. (2004) An&amp;aacute;lise comparativa da estrutura e flora do compartimento arb&amp;oacute;reo-arbustivo de um remanescente florestal na fazenda Beira Lago, Lavras, MG. &amp;Aacute;rvore (Viosa, Brasil), 28, 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622004000400005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira Filho, A.T., Carvalho, D.A., Fontes, M.A.L., van den Berg, E., Curi, N. and Carvalho, W.A.C. (2004) Structural Variations of the Arboreal Component of a Tropical Upper Montane Semideciduous Forest in the Perdizes Plateau, Carrancas, SE Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Bot&amp;acirc;nica, 27, 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042004000200009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salles, J.C. and Schiavini, I. (2007) Structure and Composition of the Regeneration Layer in an Urban Forest Fragment: Implications for the Dynamics and Conservation of the Tree Community. Acta Bot&amp;acirc;nica Bras&amp;iacute;lica (Brasil), 21, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062007000100021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, L.A. and Scariot, A. (2004) Composi&amp;atilde;o e estrutura da comunidade arbórea de uma floresta estacional decidual sobre afloramento calc&amp;aacute;rio no Brasil central. &amp;Aacute;rvore (Viosa, Brasil), 28, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622004000100009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mista, R.S. (2007) Brasil, Utilizando estimadores n&amp;atilde;o-param&amp;eacute;tricos de riqueza e rarefa&amp;atilde;o de amostras. Acta Bot&amp;acirc;nica Brasílica (S&amp;atilde;o Paulo, Brasil), 21, 943-955. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062007000400019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souza, J.S., Espirito-Santo, F.D.B., Fontes, M.A.L., Oliveira-Filho, A.T. and Bortezelli, L. (2003) An&amp;aacute;lise das varia&amp;otilde;es flor&amp;iacute;sticas e estruturais da comunidade arb&amp;oacute;rea de um fragmento de floresta semidec&amp;iacute;dua &amp;agrave;s margens do Rio Capivari, Lavras-MG. &amp;Aacute;rvore (Viosa, Brasil), 27, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622003000200009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gusson, A.E., Lopes, S.F., Dias-Neto, O.C., Vale, V.S., Oliveira, A.P. and Schiavini, I. (2009) Caracter&amp;iacute;sticas qu&amp;iacute;micas do solo e estrutura de um fragmento de floresta estacional semidecidual em Ipiau, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rodrigu&amp;eacute;sia (Brasil), 60, 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860200960212</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soares, M.P., Reys, P., Pifano, D.S., S&amp;aacute;, J.L., Silva, P.O., Santos, T.M. and Silva, F.G. (2015) Relationship between Edaphic Factors and Vegetation in Savannas of the Brazilian Midwest Region. Revista Brasileira Ci&amp;ecirc;ncia do Solo, 59, 821-829. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbcs/a/hzsFFmmdPnzVyMS5Yb5sKTb/?format=pdf https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20130726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bower, D.R. and Blocker, W.W. (1966) Notes and Observations: Accuracy of Bands and Tape for Measuring Diameter Increments. Journal of Forestry, 64, 21-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burkhart, H.E. and Tom&amp;eacute;, M. (2012) Modeling Forest Trees and Stands. Springer, Heidelberg, 461 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nunes, Y.R.F., Mendona, A.V.R., Bortelli, L., Machado, E.L.M. and Oliveira-Filho, A.T.O. (2003) Varia&amp;otilde;es da fisionomia da comunidade arb&amp;oacute;rea em um fragmento de floresta semidecidual em Lavras, MG. Acta Bot&amp;acirc;nica Brasilica, 17, 312-229. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062003000200005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chichina, M. and Hamann, A. (2015) Choosing Species for Reforestation in Diverse Forest Communities: Social Preferences versus Ecological Suitability. Eucosphere, 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00131.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126046-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dias Neto, O.C., Schavini, I., Lopes, S.F., Vale, V.S., Gusson, A.E. and Oliveira, A.P. (2009) Estrutura fitossociol&amp;oacute;gica e grupos ecol&amp;oacute;gicos em fragmento de floresta estacional semidecidual, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rodrigu&amp;eacute;sia (Brasil), 60, 1087-1099. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860200960418</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>