Excessive use of mineral fertilizers in maize farming negatively affects farmers’ income and impacts long-term soil health. This study aims to appreciate the effectiveness of biostimulant based on native
Glomeraceae arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the production and uptake of phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium of maize (
Zea mays L.) plants in central Benin. The trials were set up in a farming environment with thirty-four producers. The experimental design was composed of three treatments installed at 34 producers. Three growth parameters were evaluated on 60 ème days after sowing. Grain yield, nutritional status of maize plants and mycorrhization parameters were determined at harvest. The results showed that the
Glomeraceae + 50% NPK (NPK: azote-phosphore-potassium)_Urea treatment improved the height, the crown diameter and the leaf area by 17.85%, 21.79% and 28.32% compared to the absolute control and by 0.41%, 1.11% and 1.46% compared to the 100% NPK_Urea treatment, respectively. Similarly, grain yield improved by 45.87% with the use of
Glomeraceae + 50% NPK_Urea compared to the absolute control and by 3.96% compared to the 100% NPK_Urea treatment. The
Glomeraceae + 50% NPK_Urea significantly improved the phosphorus and potassium uptake of maize plants. With respect to nitrogen uptake, no statistical difference was observed between treatments. The mycorrhizae strains used improved root infection in the maize plants. We recorded 66% frequency and 40.5% intensity of mycorrhization. The biostimulant based on indigenous
Glomeraceae combined with 50% NPK_Urea can be used as a strategy to restore soil health and improve maize productivity in Benin.
In Benin, maize occupies an important place in dishes and is commonly consumed in several forms [1] . However, maize yield remains low [2] . The low maize yield is justified by attacks by maize pathogens, poor rainfall distribution and declining soil fertility [3] . Thus, to alleviate this problem, producers resort to using mineral inputs but in an abusive manner, which causes adverse effects on the environment and human health [4] [5] . It is, therefore, imperative to find palliative measures to make agriculture environmentally friendly [6] . Thus, several technologies are considered, including the involvement of microorganisms in agriculture, to reduce the consequences of the use of mineral fertilizers on soil health and the economy of producers [6] [7] .
Soil-plant-microorganism interactions are known in ecological studies [8] [9] [10] . But the recent aspect of molecular biology has contributed to the knowledge about the functions of microorganisms present in the soil-root environment, a case study of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) [9] . Thus, among the plant-fungal associations, the most frequent is the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: the majority of plant species are associated, at the root level, with fungi of the Glomeromycetes group [11] [12] . These fungi spread in the soil and infect plant roots through propagules, such as spores, hyphae, vesicles, and arbuscules [13] . Once in association with the roots, AMF gives up soil nutrients to the plant, which they explore beyond the capacity of the plant roots, and benefit in return from carbonaceous substances derived from photosynthesis [14] . Similarly, AMF also develops mycelia that have the property of excreting glomalin. Glomalin is a substance that is hormonal in nature. It acts as a glue that binds the finest soil particles together to form aggregates essential for the absorption of water, mineral elements and gas exchange by plants [14] . In addition, the improvement of soil structure by mycorrhizae leads to better water penetration of about 25%, thus slowing down the effect of erosion and stabilizing the soil [15] [16] . In addition, AMF has proven their effectiveness in agronomic and ecological contexts by limiting mineral inputs such as pesticides, nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (N, P, K) and conferring to plants better mineral nutrition and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [17] [18] [19] [20] . This is the case in Indonesia [21] with maize productivity and in Algeria [22] with wheat production where the benefits of symbiotic relationships of AMF and these different crops have been proven. Mycorrhizal inoculation dependence and nutrient uptake tested by [23] were significantly increased by five different AMF species used to inoculate vegetable crops, such as green bell pepper, tomato and eggplant. According to [24] , symbiosis between AMF and plants significantly increases root colonization, which consequently has different effects on root and plant growth.
In Benin, a lot of work has been done with focusing interest on the use of inoculation of different exogenous [25] [26] [27] , as well as indigenous [28] [29] [30] strains of AMF on the productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) with beneficial results. Growing maize with AMF is more profitable for producers with a net margin of 63,830 fcfa compared to 43,730 fcfa for the conventional practice of using mineral inputs in Benin [29] .
Most of these studies were conducted on small areas. The present study envisages a larger area with a view to popularizing the mycorrhizal inoculation technology in Benin. Furthermore, no study has been carried out to assess the combined effect of three indigenous strains of Glomeraceae: Glomus caledonius, Rhizophagus intraradices and Funneliformis geosporum in Benin. Similarly, there is no information on the effect of indigenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on the nutrition of maize plants (Phosphorus, Potassium and Nitrogen) in Benin.
The fact that the application of these biological strains in a cropping system is becoming urgent to achieve profitable and sustainable agriculture [31] , there is a need for further research. It is in this context that our work consists to study the efficacy of the biostimulant formulated based on the combination of three indigenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Glomus caledonius, Rhizophagus intraradices and Funneliformis geosporum) on the parameters of growth, yield and nutritional status of maize plants in a peasant environment on ferruginous soil in central Benin.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Study Area and Materials
Post-harvest activities as well as those related to mycorrhization tests were carried out at the Laboratoire de Biologie et de Typage Moléculaire en Microbiologie de l’Université d’Abomey-Calavi. In addition, activities related to seeding and collection of growth variables were carried out on three sites in three different municipalities in Central Benin, namely: Bantè (8˚25'0'' North, 1˚52'60'' East), Ouèssè (8˚28'60'' North, 2˚25'60'' East) and Dassa-Zounmè (7˚41'33'' North, 2˚13'25'' East) (Figure 1).
Fungal inoculum composed of 3 genera in the family Glomeraceae (Glomus caledonius, Rhizophagus intraradices and Funneliformis geosporum), isolated
and identified from maize rhizosphere soils in Central Benin by [28] was used. These spores were isolated from maize rhizosphere soils in central Benin, examined under a photomicroscope, identified and characterized on the basis of morphological criteria (diameter, color, ornamentation, spore wall thickness once collected in Petri dishes and mounted between slide and slide in a drop of Polyvinyl-lactoglycerol (PVLG). The description sites (http://invam.caf.wvu.sedu/Myc_Info/Taxonomy/species.htm) were consulted. The morphology of the collected spores was compared and identified based on established reference data [28] .
The seed used was the maize variety (SYNEE-W BENIN 2000) supplied by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and the National Institute of Agricultural Research of Benin (INRAB). It is an extra early variety of 8 0 days, with a potential grain yield of 2.5 t/ha in a farming environment [32] .
2.2. Methods2.2.1. Chemical Analysis of Soils
Soil samples were taken from 0 - 20 cm depth using an auger before sowing according to the method described by [33] . They were sent to the Laboratory of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences of the Agricultural Research Center of Agonkanmey. The soil pH-water was determined by the electrometric method using a pH (water). For organic matter and carbon, the [34] method was used. The extraction of exchangeable cations was done by ammonium acetate pH-7, described by [35] . Calcium, magnesium, and sodium were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Assimilable phosphorus was determined by the method of [36] . Total nitrogen was determined by the method of [37] .
2.2.2. Preparation of Biostimulant Based on Glomeraceae Strains
The biostimulant based on strains of the Glomeraceae family was formulated at the Laboratoire de Biologie et Typage Moléculaire en Microbiologie of the Faculté des Sciences et Techniques of the Université d'Abomey-Calavi. It consists in the inoculation of sorghum plants (Sorghum bicolor L.) with indigenous spores of Glomeraceae. Sorghum seeds were previously soaked for 2 minutes in a 0.024% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution and rinsed 5 times with distilled water under vortex agitation [38] . Sorghum plants were grown in greenhouse in pots containing the sterilized substrates consisting of a mixture of clay and peat (2:1v/v). Plants were watered daily with water (from the tap) to maintain a soil capacity similar to that in the field for 6 weeks and to ensure good sporulation of the strains. The root biomass and substrate were then ground to obtain the biostimulant [39] .
2.2.3. Seed Coating
The dose of biostimulant used was one kilogram (1 kg) for ten kilograms (10 Kg) of maize seeds. In fact, 600 ml of sterile distilled water was added to 1 kg of biostimulant to make a mixture into which the 10 kg of maize seeds were poured. After mixing, the maize seeds thus coated were spread out in the air for drying before sowing [40] .
2.2.4. Experimental Device and Field Maintenance
The trials were set up in central Benin at the Research and Development (R&D) sites of Miniffi, Adjantè and Gbanlin at a total of 34 producers. At each farmer’s level, the experimental set-up was the same: three elementary plots with three treatments (T0: Absolute control (no CMA, no chemical fertilizer); T1: Glomeraceae + 50% NPK_Urea and T2: 100% NPK_Urea. Each elementary plot was 500 m2 in size (25 m * 20 m). Sowing was done with two (02) seeds per plot at a spacing of 0.4 m × 0.8 m i.e. a distribution of 1562 plants per elementary plot [41] .
NPK mineral fertilizer was applied as a basal dressing on the day of sowing for treatments with the AMF biostimulant and plots with the recommended NPK rate. In addition, Urea was applied as a maintenance fertilizer on 45 ième days after sowing (DAS). The recommended dose of NPK was 200 Kg/ha and that of Urea was 100 Kg/ha [42] .
2.2.5. Determination of Growth Parameters and Grain Yield of Maize Plants
The height and the diameter at the collar of the plants were measured on the 60th day of the month using a tape measure and a caliper on the plants of the two (02) central lines that constitute the useful plot to limit the border effects. The leaf area was estimated on the 60th day of the season using the method of [43] . It consists in multiplying the product of the length and width of the leaves by a coefficient of 0.75.
Then, the maize cobs were harvested from the two (02) center rows of each elementary plot at each producer level. These ears were dehusked, shelled, and weighed per elementary plot using a precision range scale (Highland HCB 3001. Max 3000 g × 0.1 g). Grain moisture percentage was taken using a moisture meter (55 Wile DIGITAL). Yield values were determined by the following formula [44] :
R = P × 10 , 000 S × 1000 × 14 % H
where: R: Maize grain yield, expressed in t/ha; P: Mass of maize grain per elementary plot of calculation, expressed in kg; %H: Percentage of moisture; S: Harvest area in m2.
2.2.6. Assessment of the Nutritional Status of Maize Plants
The evaluation of the nutritional status of corn plants consists in the determination of the phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium contents of corn plants. Thus, after mineralization of plant material (whole maize plant) by dry method and distillation by the method of [36] , Phosphorus (P) was determined by the method of [45] , Potassium (K) by atomic absorption spectrophotometry [35] and Nitrogen (N) by [37] .
2.2.7. Evaluation of Mycorrhizal Infections
Root samples were collected at harvest. These samples were collected from the plants in the central rows of each plot that received the AMF biostimulants treatment. The staining of root fragments was done by the method of [46] while the quantification of mycorrhizal infections was done by the technique developed by [47] . Two hundred and fifty (250) milligrammes of maize roots previously washed with potable water, dried in ambient air and cut into small pieces to obtain root fragments of about 1 cm were weighed and then introduced into test tubes. A 10% KOH solution was added to the root fragments and placed in an oven at 90˚C for one hour. The roots were then carefully rinsed with tap water, drained and put back into the test tubes. Then, a 0.05% Trypan blue solution was added and incubated at 70˚C for 15 minutes. The reading was done by binoculars using [48] . The mycorrhization infection variables calculated were frequency and intensity.
Mycorrhization frequency (F%): the degree of infection of the root system.
F ( % ) = ( N − n 0 ) × 100 N
where: N: number of observed fragments; n0: number of fragments with no trace of mycorrhization.
The mycorrhization intensity (m: absolute mycorrhization intensity) expresses the portion of the cortex colonized in relation to the whole root system:
m ( % ) = 95 n 5 + 70 n 4 + 30 n 3 + 5 n 2 + n 1 N − n 0
In this formula, n5, n4, n3, n2 and n1 are the numbers of fragments marking respectively the importance of mycorrhization, namely: 5 = more than 90%, 4 = 50 to 90%, 3 = 10 to 50%, 2 = 1 to 10%, 1 = 1% of the cortex. This parameter better reflects the degree of mycorrhization. The scale ranges from 0 (no mycorrhization) to 5 (at least 90% of the fragment was mycorrhized) [48] .
2.2.8. Statistical Analysis of Data
The effect of the experimental zone (Adjantè, Gbanlin and Miniffi) and the treatments applied (T0, T1 and T2) on the growth and yield performance of the plants was assessed using a two-factor ANOVA test. A posthoc test of pairwise comparisons using the Tuckey post hoc test [49] was performed to assess the statistical differences in means for significant ANOVA tests. The different tests were performed on each variable measured in the software R 4.1.3 [50] . These analyses required the use of the packages dplyr and DescTools for the calculation of descriptive statistics, the packages ggplot2 and ggpur for the realization of the boxes with moustaches, the packages “car” for the ANOVA and the packages multcomp for the realization of the post hoc test of comparison by pairs. The threshold of significance is 5%. By means of the R package ggpubr a dotchart (lollipop) was realized in order to appreciate the frequency and intensity of mycorrhization of the plants at each experimental site.
3. Results3.1. Chemical Characteristics of the Study Soils
Table 1 illustrates the chemical characteristics of the soils at each research site where the experiments were conducted. The PHeau is 6.79 at Adjantè; 6.74 at Gbanlin and 6.62 at Minifi. Organic matter (OM) varies from 1.20 to 2.26. It is 2.26 in Adjantè, 1.25 in Gbanlin and 1.20 in Minifi. Carbon (C%) is 1.31 in Adjanté; 0.72 in Gbanlin, and 0.69 in Minifi, while the nitrogen content is 0.10 in Adjantè; 0.07 in Gbanlin and Minifi. As for exchangeable cations, values of 9.69, 5.90 and 5.67 were recorded in Adjantè, Gbanlin and Minifi, while for assimilable phosphorus, values of 18.36 in Adjantè, 21.27 in Gbanlin and 10.91 in Minifi were also recorded.
3.2. Effects of Biostimulant on Maize Plant Growth Variables
The histogram in Figure 2 illustrates the height of maize plants at 60 ème days after sowing. The smallest plant height values were obtained with treatment T0 in all study areas, with the smallest in Gbanlin (136.78 ± 0.92), while the most significant height values were obtained with treatments T1 and T2. The greatest value in the height of maize plants was recorded in Adjantè with treatment T1
Chemical characteristics of soils
Locations
C (%)
N (%)
C/N
M.O. (%)
pHwater (1/2.5)
pHKCl (1/2.5)
Ca-ech (meq/100g)
Mg (meq/100g)
K-ech (meq/100g)
Na ech. (meq/100g)
Sum. cations (meq/100g)
CEC
P. Ass. (mg/Kg)
Adjantè
1.31
0.10
12.82
2.26
6.79
6.57
7.76
1.21
0.55
0.50
10.02
9.69
18.36
Gbanlin
0.72
0.07
10.36
1.25
6.74
6.61
4.88
0.81
0.30
0.36
6.37
5.90
21.27
Minifi
0.69
0.07
10.75
1.20
6.62
6.29
5.13
1.04
0.37
0.58
7.12
5.67
10.91
MO: organic matter; Pass: assimilable phosphorus; %: percentage; ppm: part per million; meq/100g: milliequivalent per 100 g of soil; C: carbon; N: nitrogen; CEC: cation exchange capacity; K-ech: exchangeable potassium.
(172.95 ± 0.54), exceeding the absolute control T0 by 20.91%. These results were similar in the different localities. Indeed, in Adjantè, the height of the T1 treatment plants exceeds that of the T0 treatment by 17.93% followed by the T2 treatment by 15.99%. However, in Gbanlin and Minifi, it is the T2 treatment that expressed more and induced an increase of 17.66% and 18.89% compared to the absolute control, followed by the T1 treatment that exceeded the T0 absolute control by 17.27% and 18.33%, respectively. The smallest values in the height of maize plants were recorded in Gbanlin while the largest values were observed in Adjantè followed by Minifi. Plant height development was significantly influenced by the zone and especially by the treatment applied (p < 0.001). This shows an interaction between zones and treatments. The T1 treatment was more expressed in height growth in the Adjantè locality. The same T1 treatment increased height performance (168.86 cm) by 17.85% compared to the absolute control (138.72 cm) and by 0.41% compared to the T2 treatment (168.16 cm), considering the three study zones.
Figure 3 illustrates that the smallest values of diameter at the neck of maize plants were observed in Gbanlin with treatment T0 (1.37 ± 0.00). In comparison, the large values of diameter were obtained with treatments T1 and T2 with the largest value in Adjantè for treatment T1 (1.83 ± 0.01) exceeding treatment T0 by 25.14%. From Adjantè, Gbanlin to Minifi, the values of diameter at the collar of maize plants obtained with treatment T1 exceeded those of the control plants by 22.08%; 22.42% and 19.89% respectively. However, it is the T2 treatment that expressed itself the most in Gbanlin, exceeding the control by 23.34%. As for Minifi, the same diameter value (1.77 ± 0.01) was obtained with treatment T1 and T2. The observation remains the same regarding the influence of the zones and treatments on the vegetative development of the maize plants with a statistically significant effect (p < 0.001). Of the three experimental zones, the T1 treatment expressed itself better (1.78) by improving the diameter at the collar by 21.79% compared to the absolute control. The T2 treatment came with 1.77 of diameter at the collar. It should be noted that the diameter at the collar of the plants obtained with treatment T1 in Minifi and that of treatment T2 in the same locality were intermediate to those of Adjantè and Gbanlin, respectively.
Figure 4 presents the effects of treatments on the leaf area of maize plants at
60 ème days after sowing (DAS). An improvement in leaf area was obtained at Adjantè with plants treated with the biostimulant combined with 50% NPK (T1) (391.43 ± 3.86 cm2) exceeding the smallest (238.42 ± 2.30 cm2) by 39.09% at Minifi with the T0 absolute control treatment. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). At the zonal level, at Adjantè, treatment T1 induced an improvement in leaf area and exceeded treatment T0 absolute control by 32.83% while at Gbanlin and Minifi the greatest value of leaf area was obtained with treatment T2 exceeding treatment T0 absolute control by 22.68% and 30.73% followed by treatment T1 by 20.86% and 30.04%, respectively. However, no significant difference was found between the performance of T1 and T2 treatments, either at the level of each zone or as a whole. It should be noted that T1 treatment improved the leaf area (347.85) by 28.32% compared to the T0 absolute control treatment (249.33) and by 1.46% compared to T2 treatment (342.76) considering the three study areas.
3.3. Effects of Biostimulant on Maize Grain Yield
The effects of treatments on maize grain yield were shown in Figure 5. The analysis of variance revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001) between treatments. The best maize grain yield was obtained from plants treated with the combination of biostimulant plus 50% NPK (T1). Treatment T1 (3.03 t/ha) improved grain yield by 45.87% over the absolute control T0 (1.64 t/ha) and by 3.96% over
treatment T2 (2.91 t/ha) considering the results from all study areas. Regardless of the study area, treatment T1 dominated. It induced an increase in grain yield of 46.52% in Adjanté, 46.15% in Gbanlin and 44.59 in Minifi compared to the absolute control treatment T0. The lowest maize grain yield performance of the three study areas was obtained in Gbanlin with the T0 treatment (1.54 ± 0.08) while the highest performance was obtained in Adjantè with the T1 treatment (3.16 ± 0.10) and exceeded that of the T0 absolute control treatment by 51.27%.
3.4. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on the Nutritional Status of Maize Plants
According to the analysis of variance (Table 2), the effect of the biostimulant on nutrient uptake in combination with the half-dose of azote-phosphore-potassium (NPK) and urea fertilizer was significant (p < 0.05) on phosphorus and potassium content of maize plants compared to plants that did not receive the biostimulant (T0 and T2). The best phosphorus (P) accumulations were induced by the biostimulant (T1) in Adjantè and Minifi while the highest potassium (K) content was obtained with the same treatment in Gbanlin. On the other hand, no statistical difference was recorded for nitrogen (N) content between the treatments.
3.5. Mycorrhizal Colonization Rate of Maize Plant Roots
Table 3 shows the variation in mycorrhizal infections by experimental area. It is
Effect of treatments on the nutritional status of maize plants
Area
Treatment
Nitrogen (N) %
Phosphorus (P) %
Potassium (K) %
means
Standard error
means
Standard error
means
Standard error
Adjantè
T0
1.70a
0.028
1.817b
0.017
1.73
0.012
T1
1.85a
0.028
2.98f
0.012
1.88
0.017
T2
1.80a
0.006
1.85bc
0.017
1.79
0.006
Gbanlin
T0
1.68a
0.011
1.74ab
0.017
1.65
0.012
T1
1.97a
0.017
2.2e
0.058
2.06
0.012
T2
1.89a
0.017
1.95cd
0.012
1.87
0.006
Minifi
T0
1.81a
0.011
1.64a
0.01
1.87
0.006
T1
2.16a
0.127
2.93f
0.040
1.96
0.012
T2
1.91a
0.011
2d
0.012
1.89
0.006
Pr (>F)
0.1341408
3.524e−12***
1.186e−10***
*** = p < 0.001 (highly significant). Values that are not followed by the same letters in the same column are significantly different according to Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Variation in mycorrhizal infections by experimental area
Site_RD
Parameter
Average (%)
Min (%)
Max (%)
“Adjantè”
Frequency
33.1
20
51
Intensity
21.9
12.4
35.5
“Gbanlin”
Frequency
41.5
20
66
Intensity
26.4
10.7
40.5
“Minifi”
Frequency
32.6
10
45
Intensity
18.5
10
30.5
noted that the mycorrhization frequency rate varies from 10% to 66% and the mycorrhization intensity rate varies from 10% to 40.5%. Variations in the average mycorrhization frequencies and intensities of maize plant roots show that the highest average mycorrhization frequency was found in Gbanlin (41.5%) and the lowest in Minifi (32.6%). Similarly, the highest average intensity was obtained in Gbanlin (26.4%) and the lowest in Minifi (18.5%).
Figure 6 illustrates the influence of study environments on mycorhization of maize plant roots. The maximum frequencies and intensities were obtained in Gbanlin 66% and 40.5% followed by Adjantè 51% and 35.5% respectively. It was no statistically significant difference in these different results between the three study areas (p = 0.16 for frequency and p = 0.09 for intensity). The strains of native Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi used therefore have a good mycorhizogenic capacity.
3.6. Correlation between Growth, Yield and Nutritional Status Parameters of Maize Plants
A principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out to establish the relationship between the parameters of growth, yield and nutritional status of maize plants (Figure 7). The analysis shows that the first two axes retain 90.42% of the cumulative variance and can thus be used to interpret the results. Indeed, all the evaluated parameters are positively correlated with axis 1 (Dim 1). Variables such as Phosphorus, Yields, Diameter and Height are those that have the best representation quality and are positively correlated with each other. Thus, the better the plant’s capacity to absorb nutrients, especially phosphorus, the better the plant growth and grain yield.
4. Discussion
The control of the natural and optimal management of soils in the tropics for a sustainable and economic agriculture is the major concern of any research and development actor. It is within this framework that this study was initiated and aims to improve the growth and grain yield of maize by a mycorrhizal symbiosis while considerably reducing the contribution of mineral fertilizer.
The chemical characteristics of the soils in experiments showed that the soils studied were weakly acidic. The PH water varies from 6.62 to 6.79 (Table 1). In
addition, the soils of the experimental sites have average fertility in Adjantè but low fertility in Gbanlin and Minifi. This justifies the use of mineral fertilizers by farmers in the study area to improve their productivity. In fact, according to authors [51] , criteria for evaluating soil fertility classes, the classes of limitations of the soils of Gbanlin and Minifi vary globally between “medium limitations” and “severe limitations” while those of the soil of Adjantè vary between “no limitations” and “severe limitations”. According to the work of [52] , the soils of central Benin have very low Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). Thus, they recommended sustainable production systems with low mineral inputs to restore soils in central Benin. However, the different chemical parameters highlighted, the soils under study being neither too weak nor too fertile, are therefore suitable for the activity of Mycorrhizal Fungi strains because the symbiotic relationship between the maize plant and the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi arises from the reciprocal (bidirectional) exchange of needs [14] . The plant thus needs the minimum possible nutrients from the soil to be able to make sugar (carbon element) which it will share with the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi to receive in return the mineral elements from the soil that were not accessible to it [14] .
The suitability of the soils under study for mycorrhization was confirmed by the results of the mycorrhization tests carried out during the work. Indeed, the mycorrhization frequencies of the roots vary from 10% to 66% and the mycorrhization intensities of the roots vary from 10% to 40.5% on a total of one hundred (100) root fragments observed (Table 3). Mycorrhization (frequency and intensity) varies according to environmental factors of the localities and as a function of time [21] and not necessarily of spore abundance in the soil [53] . And beyond 12% of mycorrhization intensity, the benefits of the relationship become interesting in the plant according to [54] .
The results of maize plant height, crown diameter and leaf area showed that the Glomeraceae + 50% NPK_ Urea and 100% NPK_Urea treatments have a significant impact on the growth variables compared to the absolute control treatments. These plants treated with the Glomeraceae biostimulant + 50% NPK_Urea gave the best performances for the growth variables evaluated in all the experimental zones. As for the performance of the biostimulant in each zone, it can be classified from Adjantè, Minifi and Gbanlin according to the decreasing order of expression of the biostimulant on the variables (Figures 2-4). The highest values of root mycorrhizations were obtained in Gbanlin. This caused a reduction in the performance recorded in Gbanlin, although not significant, would be due to the initial quality of the Gbanlin soil because it is the poorest in C/N, exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, Na and cationic sum followed by the Minifi soil (Table 1). This observation was proved by [55] that the rational fertility of the soil is conducive to maximize the benefits of mycorrhization. This was explained by [56] that a nitrogen-mycorrhiza interaction makes the plant vigorous and naturally protected. The improvement of the results obtained in the plots treated with the biostimulant can be due to the symbiotic association of the maize plants and the biostimulant (AMF) [57] [58] . These performances obtained in the vegetative development of maize plants can be explained by the capacity of the AMF to improve plant nutrition by exploring the mineral elements from the topsoil that were not within the reach of the roots of the maize plants and that are essential for their developments [7] [59] .
In Benin, the work of [60] with native AMF strains on ferruginous soil in Northern Benin confirms our results. They showed the ameliorative effect of these Glomeraceae strains on maize plant growth. Similar results were also published by [30] [61] [62] in Benin where the beneficial effects induced by indigenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi combined with 50% mineral fertilizer were recorded. Better, [30] explained that Glomeraceae strains are effective on maize productivity in Benin.
In Togo, the experiments of [63] also proved the effectiveness of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi biostimulants on rice growth. Thus, research work conducted in Togo [64] , Cameroon [65] [66] and India [67] have shown that symbiotic microorganisms (mycorrhizae) were potential alternatives for sustainable agricultural production. [4] also proved that the application of AMF spores improved the growth of wheat plants and increased the number of leaves and dry biomass. On the other hand, [20] explained that a mycorrhized plant has a greater capacity to absorb water, phosphorus and nitrogen present in the soil. They added that the uptake of phosphorus by plants is done up to 80% by mycorrhizal fungi and thus it increases the survival of plants by about 75%. According to [16] , the effect of AMF is positively remarkable in growth stimulation and especially at root level and plant resistance to all stresses [68] . Thus, AMF could further stimulate the production of phytohormones (auxin and gibberellin) in plants that were treated with AMF for cell division and elongation [69] .
Regarding maize grain yield, the variation in performance (3.03 t/ha for plants treated with the Glomeraceae-based biostimulant combined with 50% NPK_Urea of the recommended dose versus 2.91 t/ha for plants treated with 100% NPK_ Urea of the recommended dose) obtained during these experiments testifies to the interest of AMF in agriculture. Indeed, apart from the role that AMF play in mineral and water nutrition of plants [4] [70] , AMF can be involved in the activation of abscisic acid, ethylene, auxin responsible for reproductive activities and seed maturation in plants. According to [69] , it was these phytohormones that stimulate seed initiation and formation for proper maturation. Therefore, it can be said that this AMF -based biostimulant technology used in this study was effective in improving maize grain yield in the fields in central Benin. The same observations were made by [30] who demonstrated improved maize grain yield by using indigenous Glomeraceae strains combined with a reduced dose of mineral fertilizer in Benin. In addition, the results reported by [26] on grain yield of maize produced using exogenous AMF in a controlled environment in central Benin were beneficial but less glowing than those obtained in this study. It is therefore important to note that indigenous strains of AMF are better adapted to the conditions of the study environment. These results were supported by those obtained by [63] who showed the efficacy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biostimulant on rice grain yield in Togo. In Tunisia, [31] proved that the use of AMF-based biofertilizer induces a significant increase in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) yield and its nutritional quality. Note that, the application of AMF inoculum significantly increased the phosphorus content in the leaves and stems of wheat plants. According to [70] in Morocco, not only do AMF contribute to the improvement of agricultural yield, but also to good photosynthetic activity, good stomatal conductance and decrease soil PH. And thus, they prove to be a better ally for the improvement of soil quality by modifying its general conditions [71] [72] .
In poor soils, plants adapt to nutrient deficiencies by establishing a symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. These microorganisms are able to extend nutrient uptake beyond the level of development and expansion of the root system [73] . Although no significant difference was noted in nitrogen, the application of biostimulant + 50% NPK_Urea induced a better accumulation of phosphorus and potassium levels in maize plants. These results could be explained by the good mycorrhizal capacity expressed by the indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi strains used in Gbanlin and Adjantè. The same observations were made by [74] who reported a strong positive correlation between mycorrhizal root colonization and NPK content of bean plants. The advantage conferred for maize plants on nutrient uptake by Glomeraceae + 50% NPK_Urea in our study corroborates with several other works [75] [76] .
5. Conclusion
The results of this work showed that the soils of the three localities, Adjantè in Bantè; Gbanlin in Ouessè and Minifi in Dassa-Zounmè are suitable for mycorrhization. The Glomeraceae strains used can be well adapted to the environmental conditions, which induced a good growth of the maize plants and considerably improved the maize grain yield. The performances obtained during this research prove that AMF can replace the recommended doses of NPK_Urea in the agricultural practice in the middle of Benin. Indeed, the results obtained with the Glomeraceae-based biostimulant combined with 50% NPK_Urea of the recommended dose and those obtained with the full conventional dose of NPK_Urea are statistically similar. This biostimulant is therefore of great interest for the establishment of a truly sustainable and environmentally friendly agricultural practice. Trials with this same biostimulant and under the same conditions as this one should be conducted in the North and South of Benin in order to better appreciate the potentiality of this biostimulant on maize production in the other agroecological zones of Benin. Also, it would be desirable to evaluate the aptitudes and post-harvest qualities of maize produced with the use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi biostimulant in Benin.
Authors Contributions
C.A., S.A.A., M.R.A. and M.Y.A. performed the experimental work and analysis. C.A., S.A.A., M.R.A. and M.Y.A. participated to the designing and interpretation of the results. C.A., S.A.A., S.M.I.H., O.A., N.A.A., A.A. and L.B.-M. revised the final version of the manuscript. A.A. and L.B.-M. reviewed the manuscript article. All the authors have contributed to this scientific and intellectual work and have given their approval for its publication.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin (INRAB) and the Laboratoire de Biologie et de Typage Moléculaire en Microbiologie (LBTMM).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Akpodé, C., Assogba, S.A., Hoteyi, S.M.I., Aguégué, M.R., Agbodjato, N.A., Adoko, M.Y., Amogou, O., Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2023) Use of the Biostimulant Based on the Mycorrhizae Consortium of the Glomeraceae Family in the Field to Improve the Production and Nutritional Status of Maize (Zea mays L.) Plants in Central Benin. Advances in Microbiology, 13, 323-345. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2023.136021
ReferencesAdjile, A.N., Houssou, A.P.F., Monteiro, N., Fainou, M.C., Akissoe, N.H. and Toukourou, F. (2015) Characterization of the Gambari-Lifin Process (dehulled maize flour) and Influence of Maize Variety on Physicochemical and Rheological Quality. Journal Nature & Technology, No. 12, 141-149.Zoffoun, A.G., Atchada, C.C., Yaoitcha, A.S., Sessou, E.K. and Chabi, R.B. (2018) Adaptation Strategies of Producers Facing the Impacts of Soil Depletion in the Upper Magou Basin in the Republic of Benin, Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin, Bibliothèque Nationale (BN), 4ème quarter, du Bénin, Dépôt légal No. 10899.Batamoussi, H.M., Tokore Orou Mere, S.B.J., Yaya, M. and De Dieu Fabrice Akounnou, J. (2021) Performances Agronomiques de la variété QPM/FAABA du maïs (Zea mays L.) suivant les périodes de semis en condition de perturbations climatiques. Annales De l’Université De Parakou-Série Sciences Naturelles et Agronomie, 11, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.56109/aup-sna.v11i1.23Raklami, A., Bechtaoui, N., Tahiri, A., Anli, M., Meddich, A. and Oufdou, K. (2019) Use of Rhizobacteria and Mycorrhizae Consortium in the Open Field as a Strategy for Improving Crop Nutrition, Productivity and Soil Fertility. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, Article 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01106Adeleke, B.S. and Babalola, O.O. (2020) The Endosphere Microbial Communities, a Great Promise in Agriculture. International Microbiology, 24, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-020-00140-2Fadiji, A.E., Babalola, O.O., Santoyo, G. and Perazzolli, M. (2022) The Potential Role of Microbial Biostimulants in the Amelioration of Climate Change Associated Abiotic Stresses on Crops. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, Article 829099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.829099Ojuederie, O.B., Olanrewaju, O.S. and Babalola, O.O. (2019) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacterial Mitigation of Drought Stress in Crop Plants: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy, 9, Article 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110712Igiehon, N.O. and Babalola, O.O. (2018) Below-Ground-above-Ground Plant-Microbial Interactions: Focusing on Soybean, Rhizobacteria, and Mycorrhizal Fungi. The Open Microbiology Journal, 12, 261-279. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801812010261Sangay-Tucto, S. (2018) Study of the Impact of Mycorrhizal and Rhizobial Symbioses in the Domestication of Tara, Caesalpinia spinosa L. Interactions between Organisms. University of Montpellier, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.Emmanuel, O.C. and Babalola, O.O. (2020) Productivity and Quality of Horticultural Crops through Co-Inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Microbiology Research, 239, Article ID: 126569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126569Hamza, N. (2020) Bioprotection and Biofertilization Potential of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Some Agricultural Ecosystems of Eastern Algeria, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Badji Mokhtar-Annaba, Annaba, 129.Mohammed, D.J.A., Mohammed, A.O. and Fattah, O.A. (2022) Growth Response and Water Use Efficiency in Maize (Zea mays L) Inoculated with Different Mycorrhizal Inoculums. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20, 22-33.Fortin, J.A., Plenchette, C. and Piche, Y. (2008) Les mycorhizes: La nouvelle révolution verte. Editions Multimondes, Montréal, 132 p.Drain, A., Pfister, C., Zerbib, J., Leborgne-Castel, N., Roy, S., Courty, P.E. and Wipf, D. (2017) Mécanismes cellulaires et moléculaires et ingénierie écologique des mycorhizes à arbuscules. Les sols et la vie souterraine: des enjeux majeurs en agroécologie, Chapitre 12, QUAE, 328 p.Grümberg, B.C., Conforto, A., Rovea, M., Boxler, G., March, C., Luna, M.J. and Vargas, G.S. (2010) La glomalina y surelación con la productividad del cultivo. Presented at the XXII Congreso Argentino de la Ciencia.Photo credits: CAS, Axioma, Florendi, Florentaise, If Tech, Italpollina, Premier Tech, Tradecorp, Fotolia, Smact. (2015) Biostimulants: A Key to Better Production with Fewer Inputs Chambre Syndicale des Améliorants Organiques et Supports de Culture. Edition December.Enebe, M.C. and Babalola, O.O. (2018) The Influence of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: A Survival Strategy. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102, 7821-7835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9214-zCrossay, T. (2018) Taxonomic Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Native to Ultramafic Soils of New Caledonia; Analysis of Their Synergy Enabling Plant Adaptation to These Extreme Environments. Ph. D. Thesis, Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Baco, 309.Igiehon, O.N. and Babalola, O.O. (2021) Rhizobium and Mycorrhizal Fungal Species Improved Soybean Yield under Drought Stress Conditions. Current Microbiology, 78, 1615-1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02432-wOliveira, T.C., Rodrigues Cabral, J.S., Santana, L.R., Tavares, G.G., Santos, L.D.S., Paim, T.P., Müller, C., Silva, F.G., Costa, A.C., Souchie, E.L. and Mendes, G.C. (2021) The Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Rhizophagus Clarus Improve Physiological Tolerance to Drought Stress in Soybean Plants. 1-25. (Preprint) https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1192151/v1Marlin, S., Munif, G., Pur, W., Maya, M. and Irdika, M. (2021) Diversity and Abundance of Arbuscular Fungi Mycorrhizal (AMF) in Rhizosphere Zea mays in Tidal Swamp. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 22, 5071-5076. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d221144Khirani, S. and El Hadj-Khelil, A.O. (2019) Effect of Indigenous Arbuscular Mycorhizogenous Champions on the Growth of Wheat and Barley. Algerian Journal of Arid Environment, 9, 80-93.Ortas, I., Iqbal, T. and Cem Yücel, Y. (2019) Mycorrhizae Enhances Horticultural Plant Yield and Nutrient Uptake under Phosphorus Deficient Field Soil Condition. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 42, 1152-1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1609500Askari, A., Reza Ardakani, M., Paknejad, F. and Hosseini, Y. (2019) Effects of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis and Seed Priming on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Sesame under Drought Stress Condition. Scientia Horticulturae, 257, Article ID: 108749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108749Aguégué, M.R., Noumavo, A.P., Dagbénonbakin, G., Agbodjato, A.N., Assogba, S., Koda, A.D. Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2017) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fertilization of Corn (Zea mays L.) Cultivated on Ferrous Soil in Southern Benin, Journal of Agricultural Studies, 5, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v5i3.11881Assogba, S., Noumavo, P.A., Dagbenonbakin, G., Agbodjato, N.A., Akpode, C., Koda, A.D., Aguégué, R.M., Bade, F., Adjanohoun, A., Rodriguez, A.F., de la Noval Pons, B.M. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2017) Improvement of Maize Productivity (Zea mays L.) by Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Ferruginous Soil in Center of Benin. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, 4, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.70.2017.43.63.76Koda, D.A., Noumavo, A.P., Dagbenonbakin, G., Agbodjato, A.N., Akpode, C., Assogba, S., Aguégué, M.R., Bade, F., Adjanohoun, A., Falcon Rodriguez, A., de la Noval Pons, B.M. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2018) Maize (Zea mays L.) Response to Mycorrhizal Fertilization on Ferruginous Soil of Northern Benin. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 6, 919-928. https://doi.org/10.18006/2018.6(6).919.928Assogba, A.S., Ahoyo Adjovi, N., Agbodjato, A.N., Sina, H., Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-moussa, L. (2020) Evaluation of the Mixed Effect of Some Indigenous Strains of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Under Greenhouse Conditions. European Scientific Journal, 16, 275. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n3p275Aguégué, M.R., Ahoyo Adjovi, N.R., Houédjofonon, E.M., Djinadou, K.A., Koda, A.D., Adoko, Y.M., Danbaka, J., Kelomey, A., Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2021) Financial Profitability of Maize Production with Bio-Fertilizer Based on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Native to Benin. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 13, 56-64.Agbodjato, N.A., Assogba, S.A., Babalola, O.O., Koda, A.D., Aguégué, R.M., Sina, H., Dagbénonbakin, G.D., Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2022) Formulation of Biostimulants Based on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Maize Growth and Yield. Frontiers in Agronomy, 4, Article 894489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.894489Hemissi, I., Labidi, S., Dhifalli, F., Hammami, R., Hachana, A., Hlel, D., Sifi, B. and Ben Jeddi, F. (2019) Effect of Mycorrhizal and Rhizobial Bio Inoculation on Yield Components of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Annales de l’INRA, 92, 66-81.MAEP (2016) Catalog Béninois Des Espèces Et Variétés Végétales (CaBEV), 2nd Edition. Ministère De L’Agriculture De l’Elevage Et De La Pêche; INRAB/DPVPPAAO/ ProCAD/MAEP & CORAF/WAAPP, Bibliothèque Nationale Du Bénin, 4ème Trimestre Dépôt Légal No. 8982 Du 21 Octobre 2016.Adjanohoun, A., Baba-Moussa, L., Glèlè kakaï, R., Allagbé, M., Yèhouénou, B., Gotoechan-Hodonou, H., Sikirou, R., Sessou, P. and Sohounhloué, D. (2011) Characterization of Rhizobacteria Potentially Promoting Vegetative Growth of Maize in Different Agrosystems of South-Benin. International Journal of Biology and Chemistry Sciences, 5, 433-444.Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934) An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Science, 37, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003Thomas, G.W. (1982) Exchangeable Cations, In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney, D.R., Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis, Madison, Agronom, 154-157.Bray, R.H. and Kurtz, L.T. (1945) Determination of Total, Organic and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils. Soil Science, 59, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006Kjeldahl, J. (1883) Neue Methodezur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen, Körpern. Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie, 22, 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01338151Gholami, A., Shahsavani, S. and Nezarat, S. (2009) The Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on Germination, Seedling Growth and Yield of Maize. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 49, 19-24.Rivera, R., Fernández, F., Hernández-Jiménez, A., Martín, J.R. and Fernández, K. (2003) El manejo efectivo de la simbiosis micorrízica, una vía hacia la agricultura sostenible, Estudio de caso, el Caribe. Ediciones Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas, La Habana, 1-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299979710Fernández, F., Go’mez, R., Vanegas, L.F., Martynez, M.A., de la Noval, B.M. and Rivera, R. (2000) Producto Inoculante Micorrizogeno. Oficina Nacional De Propiedad Industrial, Patente, No. 22641, Cuba.Yallou, C.G., Aïhou, K., Adjanohoun, A., Toukourou, M., Sanni, O.A., and Ali, D. (2010) Itinéraires Techniques de Production de Maïs au Bénin, Fiche technique, Dépôt légal No. 4922 du 3 Décembre, Bibliothèque Nationale du Bénin, 18.INRAB (1995) Fiche Technique Sur Les Cultures Vivrières. Vol. 75, INRAB/MAEP: Institut National des Recherches du Bénin, Bénin.Ruget, F., Bonhomme, R. and Chartier, M. (1996) Simple Estimation of Leaf Area of Growing Maize Plants. Agronomy, 16, 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19960903Ferro Valdés, E.M., Chirino González, E., Márquez Serrano, M., Mirabal Báez, E., Ríos Labrada, H., Guevara Hernández, F. and Alfaro Hernández, F. (2013) Experiencias obtenidas en el desarrollo participativo de híbridos lineales simples de maíz (Zea mays, L.) en condiciones de bajos Insumos Agrícolas. Cultivos Tropicales, 34, 61-69.Metson, A.J. (1956) Methods of Chemical Analysis for Soil Survery Samples. Soil Science, 83, 245. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195703000-00016Phillips, J.M. and Hayman, D.S. (1970) Improved Procedures for Cleaning Roots and Staining Parasitic and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Rapid Assessment of Infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55, 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3Giovannetti, M. and Mosse, B. (1980) An Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Infection in Roots. New Phytologist, 84, 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.xTrouvelot, A., Kough, J.L. and Gianinazzi, P.V. (1986) Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un systeme radiculaire. Recherche de methods d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In: Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. and Gianinazzi, S., Eds., Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae, INRA, Paris, 217-221.Douglas, C.E. and Michael, F.A. (1991) On Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons in the One-Way Analysis of Variance. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 20, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929108830487R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Quemada, M. and Cabrera, M.L. (1995) CERES-N Model Predictions of Nitrogen Mineralized from Cover Crop Residues. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 59, 1059-1065. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040015xIgué A.M., Saidou, A., Adjanohoun, A., Ezui, G., Attiogbe, P., Kpagbin, G. and Ouedraogo, J. (2013) Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Southern and Central Benin, Bull. Rech. Agron, Benin, Special Issue, Fertilisation of Maize, 12-23.Pacheco Flores de Valgaz, A., Naranjo-Morán, J., Reyes Román, G., Oviedo-Anchundia, J., Ratti Torres, M. and Barcos-Arias, M. (2022) Discovering the Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Two Cultivation Practices of Theobroma cacao. Diversity, 14, Article 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080651Oliveira, R.S., Castro, P.M.L., Dodd, J.C. and Vosátka, M. (2006) Different Native Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Influence the Coexistence of Two Plant Species in a Highly Alkaline Anthropogenic Sediment. Plant and Soil, 287, 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9067-6Pu, C., Yang, G., Li, P., Ge, Y., Garran, T.A., Zhou, X., Shen, Y., Zheng, H., Chen, M. and Huang, L. (2022) Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Alters the Nutritional Requirements in Salvia Miltiorrhiza and Low Nitrogen Enhances the Mycorrhizal Efficiency. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 1933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17121-2Ramírez-Serrano, B., Querejeta, M., Zhivko Minchev, Z., Gamir, J., Perdereau, E., Pozo, M.J, Dubreuil, G. and Giron, D. (2022) Mycorrhizal Benefits on Plant Growth and Protection against Spodoptera exigua Depend on N Availability. Journal of Plant Interactions, 17, 940-955. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2022.2120212Fasusi, O., Amoo, A. and Babalola, O.O. (2021) Propagation and Characterization of Viable Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Spores within Maize Plant (Zea mays L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 101, 5834-5841. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11235Igiehon, N.O., Babalola, O.O., Cheseto, X. and Torto, B. (2021) Effects of Rhizobia and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Yield, Size Distribution and Fatty Acid of Soybean Seeds Grown under Drought Stress. Microbiological Research, 242, Article ID: 126640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126640Alori, E.T. and Babalola, O.O. (2018) Microbial Inoculants for Improving Crop Quality and Human Health in Africa. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, Article 2213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02213Koda, A.D., Yaoitcha, A.S., Allagbe, M., Agbodjato, N.A., Dagbenonbakin, G., Aguégué, M.R., Rivera, R., Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2020) Effect of an Organic Fertilizer Based on Native Rhizophagus intraradices on Zea mays L. Yield in Northern Benin. Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research, 5, 8-17. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajahr/2020/v5i230046Assogba, A.S., Ahoyo Adjovi, N., Bello, S., Noumavo, A.P., Sina, H., Agbodjato, A.N., Adjanohoun, A. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2020) Inoculation of Native AMF Based Bio-Fertilizers for Improvement of Maize Productivity in the Center of Benin. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16, 652-660.Aguégué, M.R., Ahoyo Adjovi, N.R., Agbodjato, N.A., Noumavo, P.A., Assogba, A.S., Salami, H., Salako, V.K., Rivera R., Baba-Moussa, F., Adjanohoun, A., Glele Kakaï, R. and Baba-Moussa, L. (2021) Efficacy of Native Strains of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Maize Productivity on Ferralitic Soil in Benin. Agricultural Research, 11, 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00602-7Gnamkoulamba, A., Tounou, A.K., Tchao, M., Tchabi, A., Adjevi, A.K.M. and Batawila, K. (2018) Field Evaluation of Growth Potential and Production of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Variety IR841 Inoculated in Nursery By Four Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Strains. European Scientific Journal, 14, 1857-1881.Ogou, A., Tchabi A., Tounou, A.K., Agboka, K. and Sokame, B.M. (2018) Effect of Four Strains of Arbuscular Mychorizal Fungi on Meloidogyne spp. Main Parasitic Nematode of Soybean (Glycine max L.) in Togo. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 127, 12758-12769. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v127i1.1Tobolbaï, R., Adamou, S. and Ngakou, A. (2018) Morphological and Structural Diversities of Indigenous Endomycorrhiza Communities Associated with Maize (Zea mays L.) in Northern Cameroonian Soils. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 1, 6057-6073.Tobolbaï, R., Ngakou, A., Toukam, T.S. and Adamou, S. (2021) Potential of Endogenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi to Improve Soybean (Glycine max L.) Production in Northern Regions of Cameroon. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 163, 16846-16861.Thoker, S.A. and Sapan, P. (2020) Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and Nutrient Status of Vigna unguiculata (L.). Advances in Zoology and Botany, 8, 461-467. https://doi.org/10.13189/azb.2020.080511Yang, R., Qin, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Xu, S., Zhao, W. and Huang, Z. (2022) The Interactions between Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Trichoderma longibrachiatum Enhance Maize Growth and Modulate Root Metabolome under Increasing Soil Salinity. Microorganisms, 10, Article 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051042Maougal, R.T. (2015) Plant Physiology Course, Institute of Nutrition, Food and Agro-Food Technologies (I.N.A.T.A.A), University Frères Mentouri Constantine, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Democratic and Popular Republic of Algeria.Ben-Laouane, R., Ait-El-Mokhtar, M., Anli, M., Boutasknit, A., Rahou, Y.A., Raklami, A., Oufdou, K., Wahbi, S. and Meddich, A. (2021) Green Compost Combined with Mycorrhizae and Rhizobia: A Strategy for Improving Alfalfa Growth and Yield under Field Conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen, 73, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-020-00537-zMatos, P.S., da Silva, C.F., Pereira, M.G., da Silva E.M.R., Tarre, R.M., Franco, A.L.C. and Zonta, E. (2022) Short-Term Modifications of Mycorrhizal Fungi, Glomalin and Soil Attributes in a Tropical Agroforestry. Acta Oecologica, 114, Article ID: 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2022.103815Xin, Y., Fan, Y., Babalola, O.O., Zhang, X. and Yang, W. (2022) Legacy Effects of Biochar and Compost Addition on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community and Co-Occurrence Network in Black Soil. Microorganisms, 10, Article 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112137Bahadur, A., Batool, A., Nasir, F., Jiang, S., Mingsen, Q., Zhang, Q., Pan, J., Liu, Y. and Feng, H. (2019) Mechanistic Insights into Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-Mediated Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20, Article 4199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174199Abdel-Fattah, G.M., Shukry, W.M., Shokr, M.M. and Ahmed, M.A. (2016) Application of Mycorrhizal Technology for Improving Yield Production of Common Bean Plants. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 4, 191-197. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v4i2.15103Chu, Q., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Yuan, L., Chen, F., Zhang, F., Feng, G. and Rengel, Z. (2020) Soil Plant-Available Phosphorus Levels and Maize Genotypes Determine the Phosphorus Acquisition Efficiency and Contribution of Mycorrhizal Pathway. Plant and Soil, 449, 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04494-4Fall, A.F., Nakabonge, G., Ssekandi, J., Founoune-Mboup, H., Badji, A., Ndiaye, A., Ndiaye, M., Kyakuwa, P., Anyoni, O.G., Kabaseke, C., Ronoh, A.K. and Ekwangu J. (2023) Combined Effects of Indigenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and NPK Fertilizer on Growth and Yields of Maize and Soil Nutrient Availability. Sustainability, 15, Article 2243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032243