Background: Since the appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic, several drugs have also been proposed for the treatment of the COVID-19, but the therapeutic effectiveness of those drugs is not satisfactory. This situation has led to the search for therapeutic solutions based on recipes from traditional medicine.
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical safety, efficacy and tolerability of the phytomedicine APIVIRINE in patients with non-severe COVID-19.
Methods: Patients were included following defined criteria and followed on an outpatient basis until recovery in accordance with national guidelines for the management of single cases of COVID-19 in Burkina Faso. Vital signs, anthropometric parameters as well as electrocardiographic, hematological and biochemical examinations were measured on D4, D7, D14 and D21. Adverse events were recorded during maintenance.
Results: The present study included 45 patients. The clinical signs present at inclusion were mostly cough (44.44%), asthenia (42.22%), headache (40%), and anosmia (35.55%). Dyspnoea and chest pain were less represented in 05 (11.11%) and 06 (13.33%) patients. Cough, dyspnoea, chest pain, fever, sore throat, headache, and nasal obstruction present at inclusion disappeared before Day 4 of treatment. Anosmia and asthenia disappeared before Day 7. At the inclusion visit (Day 1), CRP, WBC, and blood glucose were abnormal in 15 (33.33%), 13 (28.89%), and 11 (24.44%) patients respectively. In addition, 3 (6.66%) patients had elevated creatinine levels. Transaminases Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) were elevated in 05 (11.11%) patients while Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) was elevated in 04 (8.89%) patients. After 4 days of treatment, the cure rate was 33.33% of patients and 48.89% after 7 days. The cumulative cure rate was 86.67% after 14 days of treatment.
Conclusion: No serious side effects or allergic reactions were observed during treatment. No clinical complications were observed and all symptoms present resolved on the 7th day of treatment.
APIVIRINE COVID-19 Clinical Study SafetyAbstract
Background: Since the appearance of the COVID-19 pandemic, several drugs have also been proposed for the treatment of the COVID-19, but the therapeutic effectiveness of those drugs is not satisfactory. This situation has led to the search for therapeutic solutions based on recipes from traditional medicine. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical safety, efficacy and tolerability of the phytomedicine APIVIRINE in patients with non-severe COVID-19. Methods: Patients were included following defined criteria and followed on an outpatient basis until recovery in accordance with national guidelines for the management of single cases of COVID-19 in Burkina Faso. Vital signs, anthropometric parameters as well as electrocardiographic, hematological and biochemical examinations were measured on D4, D7, D14 and D21. Adverse events were recorded during maintenance. Results: The present study included 45 patients. The clinical signs present at inclusion were mostly cough (44.44%), asthenia (42.22%), headache (40%), and anosmia (35.55%). Dyspnoea and chest pain were less represented in 05 (11.11%) and 06 (13.33%) patients. Cough, dyspnoea, chest pain, fever, sore throat, headache, and nasal obstruction present at inclusion disappeared before Day 4 of treatment. Anosmia and asthenia disappeared before Day 7. At the inclusion visit (Day 1), CRP, WBC, and blood glucose were abnormal in 15 (33.33%), 13 (28.89%), and 11 (24.44%) patients respectively. In addition, 3 (6.66%) patients had elevated creatinine levels. Transaminases Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) were elevated in 05 (11.11%) patients while Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) was elevated in 04 (8.89%) patients. After 4 days of treatment, the cure rate was 33.33% of patients and 48.89% after 7 days. The cumulative cure rate was 86.67% after 14 days of treatment. Conclusion: No serious side effects or allergic reactions were observed during treatment. No clinical complications were observed and all symptoms present resolved on the 7th day of treatment.
Keywords:
APIVIRINE, COVID-19, Clinical Study, Safety
1. Introduction
The COVID-19 outbreak occurred in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, and gradually spread worldwide. Sub-Saharan Africa, which had long been spared, declared its first case of COVID-19 on 27 February 2020 in Nigeria. The spread of the pandemic then rapidly spread to all African countries [1] . Burkina Faso reported its first case of COVID-19 on 9 March 2020. As of October 2022, a total of 676,609,955 cases had been reported worldwide, including 6,881,955 deaths [2] . Thus, COVID-19 is a public health emergency of international concern more than ever.
The SARS-Cov-2 infection causes a range of cases ranging from mild with mild clinical symptoms without pneumonia to severe and often fatal (respiratory distress, hypoxia (SpO2 ≤ 93%), abnormal blood gases) [3] [4] .
The availability of current vaccines is a severe problem for developing countries despite the COVAX initiative set up by the ACT Accelerator led by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI), the GAVI Alliance (formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) and the WHO. In addition, their populations are reluctant to accept these vaccines. Anti-malarial drugs (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine), anti-inflammatory drugs (dexamethasone) and antiviral drugs (remdesivir, lopinavir, etc.) have also been proposed for the treatment of COVID-19, but their therapeutic effectiveness is not satisfactory. [5] . The populations of 93% of countries in the Western Pacific region compared to 80% to 90% in developing countries such as Burkina Faso use traditional medicine for their primary health needs [6] [7] . This situation has led to the search for therapeutic solutions based on recipes from traditional medicine to address the pandemic in Africa and around the world [8] . This is the case in countries such as Madagascar (COVID Organics), India (Ayurvedic Kadha) and China (Guduchi Ghan Vati), which have embarked on research into plant-based medicines to provide a solution for the treatment of patients suffering from COVID-19 [9] . Also, clinical trials have already been conducted on herbal preparations such as Qingfei Paidu Decoction (QFPDD) and Jinhua Qinggan (JHQG) [10] [11] [12] . In the same vein, in Burkina Faso, a phytomedicine called APIVIRINE, which is made from aqueous extracts of Dichrostachys glomerata (Forssk.). Chiov. (D. cinerea) (Mimosaceae) has been proposed in a clinical evaluation of patients with COVID-19. This phytomedicine was already used as an antiretroviral against HIV/AIDS and as an antibiotic. The chemical compounds mainly present in Dichrostachys glomerata are gallic tannins and catechin tannins; three are abundant: Alkaloids, Flavonoids and Saponosides [13] [14] [15] . Among the phenolic compounds, molecules such as quercetin-3-O-apiosyl-3"O-gallate, myricetin-3-O-rhamnopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-glucopyranoside, quercetin-3-O-Lrhamnopyranosyl (1"-6")-O-D-glu-copyranoside, quercetin-3-O-rhamnopyranoside, quercetin-3-O-glucopyranoside, quercetin-3-O-galactopyranoside, apigenin, kaempferol, have been isolated from the aerial parts of the plant [13] . Molecules such as (–)-festidinol and (–)-epicatechin (from the flavan-3-ols) have been isolated from the extracts [16] . Studies have shown that molecules such as myricetin, kaempferol, quercetin, apigenin and epicatechin have antiviral activity on SARS-CoV-2. These molecules affect SARS-CoV-2 by inhibiting ACE2 receptors either by protease inhibition or by immunomodulation of inflammation by regulating the infection-induced cytokine storm [17] [18] [19] [20] . This study aimed to evaluate the clinical safety, efficacy and tolerability of the phytomedicine APIVIRINE in patients with non-severe COVID-19. Specifically, the aim was to determine the safety and tolerability of APIVIRINE in terms of adverse events during treatment; to determine the effect of APIVIRINE on the improvement of COVID-19 symptoms.
2. Patients and Methods2.1. Study Population
The study was conducted in male and female patients 20 to 65 years old, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. All patients had no severe symptoms.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Only patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included in this study: 1) diagnosed positive for COVID-19 without signs of severity and by RT-PCR; 2) at least 20 years of age and no more than 65 years of age; 3) signed the informed consent; 4) willingness and ability to comply with the study protocol during the study period.
However, patients were excluded from the study if they: 1) have renal failure; 2) have heart failure; 3) have a QTc Interval > 500 ms; 4) be diabetic with complications; 5) are immunocompromised; 6) have chronic liver disease with transaminases greater than 5 times normal; 7) have known chronic diseases (cancers, tuberculosis…); 8) are a pregnant or breastfeeding woman; 9) participate in any other ongoing clinical study; 10) are of legal age and unable to comply with the study protocol; 11) have other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardise the safety or rights of the study participant or render the subject unable to comply with the protocol.
2.3. Study Design
A clinical evaluation of APIVIRINE was conducted in patients with COVID-19. Each patient was followed until the cure. Inclusion was from 30 October 2020 to 4 January 2021. The total duration of the study was 10 weeks.
Patients were recruited at COVID-19 screening sites in Ouagadougou. They were then followed up on an outpatient basis (home confinement), following the national guidelines for managing single cases of COVID-19 in Burkina Faso (Ministry of Health, 2020).
The National Influenza Reference Laboratory (LNR-G) of the “Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS)” carried out the diagnostic tests for COVID-19 by RT-PCR in Ouagadougou. Nasopharyngeal samples collected for RT-PCR were stored at 2˚C - 8˚C and sent to the National Influenza Reference Laboratory (LNR-G). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the virus RNA was extracted from oropharyngeal and/or nasopharyngeal swabs using the QIAamp RNA Viral Kit (Qiagen, Heiden, Germany). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using primers and probes from the ThermoFisher TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR kit. The ORF1ab, N and S genes of the novel 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) are selected as target regions for amplification.
The Applied BiosystemsTM 7500 Fast Real-Time instrument was used for amplification. A specimen is positive if it shows an obvious amplification curve with a CT value, cycle threshold less than or equal to 37 (CT ≤ 37) for the three ORF1ab, N, S genes or for two of the genes. The identification of each gene was made by the number of TC (cycle threshold).
2.4. Sample Size
The open-label, controlled clinical trial considers a cohort of patients who are administered APIVIRINE with a repeated dose during the time of management.
Patients will be treated for a fortnight, which is sufficient time to observe negativation of SARS-CoV-2 viral carriage. A medical visit to assess possible late side effects will be carried out one week after the end of treatment.
Under the assumption of an approximation between the binomial distribution and the standard reduced normal distribution and the hypothesis that APIVIRINE treatment produces a cure rate of more than 80% after 14 days of treatment, the minimum sample size necessary to test this hypothesis was calculated to be 41 patients. Assuming a 10% non-respondent rate, a sample size of 45 patients was included in the study. To test this hypothesis the sample size is obtained by applying the Cohen following formula [21] .
n = 2 ( Z 1 − α − Z 1 − β ϕ ( π ) − ϕ ( π 0 ) ) 2
where
ü α = 5% the significance level;
ü Z1-α/2 is the fractile of order 1 - α/2;
ü 1 − β is the power to detect a difference between the healing proportions is set at 80%;
ü Z1−β is the fractile of order 1 − β of the normal distribution;
ü ϕ is the distribution function of a normal distribution;
ü ϕ ( π ) − ϕ ( π 0 ) is the effect size considered, i.e. the difference between the proportion π0 of cured patients treated according to the national protocol and the proportion π of cured patients treated with APIVIRINE after one week of treatment.
Considering an objective of detecting a mean effect according to Cohen’s criterion, the minimum sample size determined using the values below is 41 patients. Considering a no response proportion of 10%, this gives a sample size of 45 patients to be included in the study.
2.5. Treatment and Follow-Up
The phytomedicine APIVIRINE 350 mg capsule was administered at home as follows: 3 capsules 4 times daily, i.e. 3 capsules every 6 hours for 14 days.
After inclusion, participants were followed for 21 days.
Vital signs such as temperature, pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse oxygen saturation (POS) and heart rate were taken during the follow up at home. Anthropometric parameters such as weight and height were also measured.
The clinical doctors interviewed the participants’ about their medical and surgical history, looking for potentially adverse comorbidities. Functional respiratory signs such as cough and dyspnoea were explored during the interview. Other symptoms of COVID-19 were also sought through a thorough physical examination of each patient.
The paraclinical examination included: electrocardiogram (ECG); computed tomography (CT); a biological assessment carried out from a blood sample taken on day 1 before starting the treatment: and including a haematological examination (blood count, ESR) and a biochemical assessment [transaminases (ALT, AST), creatinemia, glycaemia, C-Reactive Protein (CRP)]; a nasopharyngeal swab for RT-PCR of the coronavirus.
The follow-up visits V2 to V5 at D4, Day7 (D7), Day14 (D14) and D21 [22] [23] . At each visit at home, a complete interview, physical examinations were performed and adverse events were recorded.
2.6. Judgment Criteria
Primary endpoint: Systemic reactions
The rate of immediate reactions (IRs) and reactions within days of the first dose as well as any serious adverse events (SAEs) that occurred between enrolment and discharge from the study. The relationship of the SAEs to the trial drug should be established by the investigator using the following definitions: unrelated, possible relationship, probable relationship, established relationship.
Secondary endpoints
The time to the fever clearance and clinical signs present at patient admission were assessed. The efficacy of APIVIRINE phytodrug on COVID-19 viral load were evaluated through the viral load clearance time based on the Cycle Thresholds (CTs) of RT-PCR. Moreover, the proportion of RT-PCR negative was calculated at D4, D7, D14, D21.
Ethical considerations
The protocol received a favorable opinion after examination by the “Comité d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé (CERS)” (Ethics Committee for Health Research) of the Burkina Faso Ministry of Health under Deliberation number N˚2020-7-121 of 1 July 2020.
2.7. Statistical Analyses
Statistical processing was done on the 45 patients of the study, considering an intention-to-treat analysis. An exploratory analysis including completeness assessment, examination of the tails of the distribution of quantitative data, and identification and correction of erroneous data was done first. This was followed by an analysis of the sample descriptors to define the socio-demographic, clinical and biological profiles of patients at inclusion. Central tendency and dispersion statistics were calculated.
3. Results3.1. Patients Characteristics
Sociodemographic characteristics
The present study included 45 patients from the 09 districts of Ouagadougou. The female sex was represented by 53.3% (24 patients). The median age was 31 years (27 years; 46 years) with extremes of 20 years and 64 years. The distribution of patients by sex and age is shown in Table 1.
Distribution of patients by sex and age (n = 45)
Variables
n
Percentage
Sex
Male
21
46.7
Female
24
53.3
Age (year)
<30
16
35.6
[30 - 49]
23
51.1
[50 - 65]
06
13.3
Biological and CT profile of patients at inclusion
In this study, one (01) patient (2.22%) was a carrier of AS haemoglobinopathy, and the rest were AA homozygotes.
Chest CT was performed in all patients at inclusion. Abnormal ground glass images were found in 10 (22.22%) patients.
3.2. Evolution of Biological Parameters
Assessment of clinical tolerance
During this study, no serious adverse events were reported. However, one (01) case of non-persistent diarrhoea was recorded in one (01) patient during treatment which stopped after taking a loperamide tablet.
The course of symptoms during treatment is recorded in Table 2. Analysis of this table shows the existence of respiratory distress, nausea, pruritus, rash, constipation and dizziness in 01 (2.22%), 02 (4.44%), 02 (4.44%), 01 (2.22), 01 (2.22%) and 02 (4.44%) patients respectively at inclusion. Only nausea persisted in 01 patient [01 (2.22%)] until D7 before disappearing.
Electrocardiograms were performed in all patients at baseline and at follow-up visits (data not shown). No heart rhythm abnormalities were observed in all patients during the entire treatment period.
Three (6.66%) patients in the study missed doses of the drug according to the treatment schedule, including one dose in 01 patient (2.22%) and three doses in 02 patients (4.44%). Forgetfulness was the only reason cited for this non-compliance. Thus, the taste of the drug was not cited as a reason for non-adherence. The acceptability of the smell and the number of drugs taken per dose were not assessed during the treatment. Nevertheless, some patients reported that the regimen was restrictive due to the high number of doses per day.
Evolution of symptoms throughout the treatment
Adverse effects
Day1 = Inclusion (n = 45) n (%)
Day4 (n = 45) n (%)
Day7 (n = 30) n (%)
Day14 (n = 20) n (%)
Day21 (n = 3) n (%)
Paresthesia
0 (0)
1 (2.22)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Respiratory distress
1 (2.22)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Dyspnea
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Nausea
2 (4.44)
2 (4.44)
1 (3.33)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Diarrhea
0 (0)
0 (0)
1 (3.33)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Vomiting
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Abdominal pain
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Pruritus
2 (4.44)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Skin rash
1 (2.22)
1 (2.22)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Bone pain
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Limb inflamations (oedemas)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
Other symptoms
- Constipation 01 (2.22); - Dizziness 02 (4.44)
Anosmia/agueusia 01 (2.22);
Nothing
Nothing
Nothing
3.3. Evolution of Biological Parameters
Biological data of the patients were systematically collected during the different medical visits, including the inclusion visit (Table 3).
Evolution of biological data during medical visits
Biological analyses
Day1 = Inclusion (n = 45) n (%)
Day7 (n = 26) n (%)
Day14 (n = 16) n (%)
Day21 (n = 1) n (%)
High sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L)
<6
27 (60.00)
19 (73.08)
15 (93.75)
1 (100.00)
≤6
18 (40.00)
7 (26.92)
1 (6.25)
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)
≤10
12 (26.67)
12 (46.15)
13 (81.25)
1 (100.00)
>10
33 (73.33)
14 (53.85)
3 (18.75)
White blood cells (/mm3)
<4000
3 (6.67)
[4000 - 10,000]
32 (71.11)
22 (84.62)
16 (100.00)
1 (100.00)
>10,000
10 (22.22)
4 (15.38)
Neutrophil count/(mm3)
<1500
7 (15.55)
3 (11.54)
3 (18.75)
[1500 - 7500]
35 (77.78)
22 (84.61)
13 (81.25)
1 (100.00)
>7500
3 (6.67)
1 (3.85)
Lymphocyte count/mm3)
<1000
[1000 - 4000]
31 (68.89)
17 (65.38)
11 (68.75)
1 (100.00)
>4000
14 (31.11)
9 (34.62)
5 (31.25)
Blood glucose level (mmol/L)
<4.1
7 (15.56)
[4.1 - 6.1]
26 (57.78)
>6.1
12 (26.67)
Hemoglobin level (g/dL)
<13
30 (66.67)
16 (61.54)
10 (62.50)
1 (100.00)
[13 - 17]
15 (33.33)
10 (38.46)
6 (37.50)
>17
Platelets (/mm3)
<100,000
1 (2.22)
[100,000 - 300,000]
37 (82.22)
15 (57.69)
8 (50.00)
1 (100.00)
>300,000
7 (15.56)
11 (42.31)
8 (50.00)
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)
Males
≤40
19 (90.48)
11 (91.67)
8 (100.00)
>40
2 (9.52)
1 (8.33)
Females
≤31
22 (91.67)
13 (92.86)
7 (87.50)
1 (100.00)
>31
2 (8.33)
1 (7.14)
1 (12.50)
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)
Males
≤38
20 (95.24)
12 (100.00)
8 (100.00)
>38
1 (4.76)
Females
≤31
21 (87.50)
12 (85.71)
7 (87.50)
1 (100.00)
>31
3 (12.50)
2 (14.29)
1 (12.50)
Creatinemia (µmol/l)
Males
<61.8
[61.8; 123.7]
18 (85.71)
12 (100.00)
8 (100.00)
---
>123.7
3 (14.29)
Females
<53
1 (4.17)
[53; 97.2]
21 (87.50)
12 (85.71)
8 (100.00)
1 (100.00)
>97.2
2 (8.33)
2 (14.29)
The results showed that at the inclusion visit (D1), CRP, White Blood Cell (WBC) and blood glucose were abnormal in 15 (33.33%), 13 (28.89%) and 11 (24.44%) patients respectively. In addition, three (03) patients had elevated creatinine levels. Transaminases levels in patients were variable. Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) were elevated in 05 (11.11%) patients, while Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) was elevated in 04 (8.89%) patients. At the end of the treatment (D21), all patients normalized these parameters.
RT-PCR was performed in all patients at the second visit (D4) and at the third (D7), fourth (D14) and fifth (D21) scheduled visits when the previous visit result was still positive.
After 4 days of treatment, the cure rate was 33.33% (15/45) of patients and 48.89% (22/45) after 7 days. The cumulative cure rate was 86.67% after 14 days of treatment. However, the cumulative cure rate was 93.33% on day 15 of treatment.
The statistical test comparing the cure rate of this study to 80% concludes that there is no evidence to support the superiority hypothesis. The proportion of cures would not be statistically different from 80% (p = 0.1318).
3.4. Evolution of the Patients’ Clinical Parameters
Median temperature values were normal at all medical visits. However, high maximum temperature values were recorded during the inclusion visit, ranging from 38.7˚C to 39.2˚C. All maximum temperatures were normalized by the second medical visit (D4) until the end of treatment (Table 4).
3.5. Evolution of the Patients’ Clinical Signs
Positive contacts were the most represented with 22 patients (48.8%). The clinical signs present at inclusion were mostly cough (44.44%), asthenia (42.22%), headache (40%) and anosmia (35.55%). In the study, dyspnoea and chest pain were poorly represented in 05 (11.11%) and 06 (13.33%) patients. In particular, cough, dyspnoea, chest pain, fever, sore throat, headache and nasal obstruction, which were present at inclusion, disappeared before D4 of treatment. Only anosmia and asthenia disappeared before D7. It should be noted that the same patient could present several clinical signs at inclusion. The evolution of the functional signs during the treatment is recorded in Table 5.
4. Discussion
This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and tolerability of APIVIRINE, a phytomedicine based on the leaves of Dichrostachys glomerata (Forssk.) Chiov. (Mimosaceae) in adult patients with COVID-19.
Evolution of clinical constants during the treatment
Constants
D1 = Inclusion (n = 45) Median (Min; Max)
D4 (n = 45) Median (Min. Max)
D7 (n = 30) Median (Min; Max)
D14 (n = 20) Median (Min; Max)
D21 (n = 3) Median (Min; Max)
Body temperature. Median (IQR) (˚C) 1
37.2 (35.9; 38.7)
37 (36; 37.8)
36.9 (36.1; 37.9)
37 (36.5; 37.7)
36.7 (36.7; 37.6)
Body temperature. Median (IQR) (˚C) 2
37.1 (35.9; 38.9)
37 (36.1; 37.8)
36.8 (36.1; 37.8)
37 (36.5; 37.6)
36.7 (36.7; 37.7)
Body temperature. Median (IQR) (˚C) 3
37.1 (35.8; 39.2)
37 (36.1; 37.8)
36.9 (36.1; 37.8)
36.9 (36.5; 37.7)
36.8 (36.6; 37.6)
Breathing rate. Median (IQR)
19 (16; 30)
18 (17; 23)
18 (16; 22)
18.5 (18; 19)
18 (18; 20)
Saturation (SpO2)
98 (94; 100)
--
---
---
Heart Rate. Median (IQR)
81 (52; 118)
84 (52; 117)
84.5 (52; 101)
84.5 (53; 89)
86 (67; 88)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
127 (100; 100)
128 (100; 75)
128 (113; 167)
128.5 (120; 57)
125 (125; 137)
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
77 (63; 109)
76.5 (67; 97)
77 (67; 97)
79 (69; 92)
76 (69; 82)
Evolution of symptoms during treatment
Symptoms
D1 = Inclusion (n = 45) n (%)
D4 (n = 45) n (%)
D7 (n = 30) n (%)
D14 (n = 20) n (%)
D21 (n = 3) n (%)
Cough
20 (44.44)
00
00
00
00
Dyspnea
05 (11.11)
00
00
00
00
Chest pain
06 (13.33)
00
00
00
00
Anosmia
16 (35.55)
01 (2.22)
00
00
00
Nasal obstruction
10 (22.22)
00
00
00
00
Asthenia
19 (42.22)
02 (4.44)
00
00
00
Fever
12 (26.67)
00
00
00
00
Headaches
18 (40)
00
00
00
00
Sore throat
10 (22.22)
00
00
00
00
Evaluation of tolerance
The results of this study showed that the study population tolerated well APIVIRINE. Indeed, no serious adverse events were reported in any of the study patients during treatment. These results are comparable to those of clinical studies using phytomedicines in patients with COVID-19 [5] [24] . However, one (01) case of non-persistent diarrhoea was recorded and stopped following loperamide administration. Clinically, all symptoms reported at inclusion disappeared by D7 of treatment, and no clinical complications were found. Furthermore, no symptomatic rebound was noted during treatment, in contrast to retrospective follow-up data in patients with COVID-19 [25] . Similarly, no heart rhythm abnormalities were observed in all patients during the entire treatment period.
These results support those of preclinical studies showing the absence of significant toxicological changes in haematological, biochemical and histological parameters of vital organs up to a dose of 2500 mg/kg/day bodyweight of the methanolic extract of leaves of the plant in rats [26] [27] .
Transaminases (AST and ALT) and creatinine levels are liver, heart, and kidney function indicators. Studies have shown that liver and kidney damage is associated with COVID-19 infection [3] [28] . Some patients had undisturbed transaminases and creatinine levels at baseline. However, patients with disturbances at inclusion had normalized transaminases and creatinine levels by day 14 in the present study. Laboratory work has also shown that D. glomerata leaves have hepatoprotective properties in rats [26] .
Clinical and virological efficacy
Clinically, the predominance of dry cough and fever in the study patients could be explained by the pathophysiology of the disease. Indeed, after an incubation period of about five days, 70% of infected patients develop a cough [3] [29] . In addition, symptoms such as fever, dyspnoea, chest pain and asthenia have also been described in other patients in China [30] . The viral invasion phase is followed, in some patients, by an inadequate immune response marked by worsening respiratory symptomatology and inflammatory syndrome, usually eight to ten days after the first symptoms [3] . Indeed, the study results showed that an elevated CRP at baseline in some patients was normalized after 14 days of treatment.
In this study, cough, dyspnoea, chest pain, fever, sore throat, headache and nasal obstruction, present at inclusion, disappeared before D4 of treatment. Standardized prospective follow-up studies in untreated patients have shown that the duration of symptoms often exceeded 2 weeks [31] . A retrospective study of untreated outpatients with COVID-19 showed that asthenia and anosmia persisted for more than 14 days [25] . A population-based cohort study also showed that only 80% of 2904 COVID-19 patients had symptomatic resolution after 30 days [32] . Thus, there was a gain in time to resolution of signs by APIVIRINE treatment where only anosmia and asthenia disappeared before the seventh day of treatment.
Moreover, all the high maximum temperatures at inclusion were normalized by the fourth day (D4) of treatment. Preclinical studies have indeed highlighted the anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic properties of the leaves of the plants [16] [26] [33] [34] [35] . This effect could be attributed to the dose-dependent broncho-relaxant effect of the plant leaf extract on guinea pig tracheal preparations [26] .
This study also showed virological cure rates of 33.33%, 48.89% and 86.67% after the fourth, seventh and fourteenth day of treatment, respectively. These rates are significantly higher than the results obtained with 7 days of Lopinavir/Ritonavir treatment, where only 3/55 (5.45%) samples tested negative after 3 to 5 days [36] . In a study comparing traditional Chinese treatments with modern antiviral and antibiotic treatments, the median clearance time for SARS-CoV-2 was 12 and 15.5 days, respectively [37] . Treatment with APIVIRINE would improve the cure rate of patients and avoid complications compared to other treatments and the natural course of the disease. Indeed, a follow-up study of antibodies showed that the rate of neutralizing antibodies only reached 80 to 100% between 14 and 21 days after infection with SARS-CoV-2 [30] . Preclinical studies have highlighted the antiviral properties (Poliovirus Astrovirus, HSV 1, Equine HSV, Canine Bovine and Parvovirus, Influenza A (H5N1) virus) of the plant’s leaves [38] . In addition, clovamide, an antiviral compound active against the influenza A (H5N1) virus (74% at 20 µg/mL) has already been isolated as a major compound from D. glomerata leaves [16] . Many studies have shown that molecules such as myricitin, kaempferol, quercetin, apigenin and epicatechin have antiviral activity on SARS-CoV-2. Studies have shown that flavonoids exert their immunomodulatory activity through regulation of inflammatory mediators, inhibition of endothelial activation, NLRP3 inflammasome, toll-like receptors (TLRs), or bromodomain containing protein 4 (BRD4), and activation of erythroid nuclear factor 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Thus, this immunomodulatory activity could be beneficial in regulating the cytokine storm during SARS-CoV-2 infection [20] .
Indeed, flavonoids such as kaempferol and quercetin have shown inhibitory properties of protein kinase B and protein kinase phosphorylation with a selective blockade of channel 3a expressed in cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 [39] .
Also, quercetin (3,3',4',5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) has been reported as one of the potent inhibitors of inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production [17] . A recent study has shown that flavonoids such as epicatechin have the potential to naturally block or weaken the entry of SARS-CoV-2 as well as its subsequent invasion via a stable ACE2-epicatechin complex [18] .
It has also been demonstrated that apigenin is a good candidate for the inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 protease Mpro through hydrogen bonds, electronics and hydrophobic interactions [40] .
These molecules have also been isolated from the extracts of D. glomerata constituting APIVIRINE. This could explain the antiviral effect of this phytomedicine in patients.
However, it should be noted that the effect of the plant or APIVIRINE on SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been evaluated preclinically and is the immediate prospect of this study.
5. Limitation
The study was carried out on an outpatient basis, and the taking of medication could only be directly observed during scheduled visits.
6. Conclusion
APIVIRINE treatment has been well tolerated in patients with COVID-19 without signs of severity. No serious side effects or allergic reactions were observed during treatment. Patients with abnormal blood creatinine, transaminases and blood glucose parameters of interest experienced normalization of values at the end of treatment. A cure rate of 86% was obtained after two weeks of treatment. All the patients progressed favorably towards recovery on the 21st day of treatment. No clinical complications were observed and all symptoms present resolved on the 7th day of treatment. The patients who were positive between the two controls had a declining viral load. Treatment with APIVIRINE is reportedly well tolerated and reduces healing time as well as the risk of complications in patients with COVID-19.
Authors Contributions
DO and AH conducted clinical study data collection, GT conducted monitoring study, JCRPO and ST have done data analysis, SO, GGO, LB and NO have done study design, critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content, FBK and ZT have done Lab analysis supervision, MO has been the principal investigator of the study, SO has been the supervisor of the study. All authors have participated in the manuscript writing and have given approval to the final version.
Funding
The study was funded by the “Fond National de la Recherche et de l’Innovation pour le Développement” (FONRID, Burkina Faso) [In English: National Fund for Research and Innovation for Development].
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Ouédraogo, D., Tarnagda, G., Ouédraogo, J.C.R.P., Héma, A., Tiendrebéogo, S., Ouédraogo, S., Ouédraogo, G.G., Belemnaba, L., Ouédraogo, N., Kini, F.D.B., Tarnagda, Z., Ouédraogo, M. and Ouédraogo, S. (2023) Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Phytomedicine APIVIRINE Based on Aqueous Extracts of Dichrostachys glomerata (Forssk.). Chiov. (D. cinerea) in COVID-19 Patients without Signs of Severity. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14, 302-318. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2023.146026
ReferencesLone, S.A. and Ahmad, A. (2020) COVID-19 Pandemic—An African Perspective. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 9, 1300-1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1775132CSSE and JHU (2021) COVID-19 Dashboard [Internet]. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.htmlBonny, V., Maillard, A., Mousseaux, C., Plaais, L. and Richier, Q. (2020) COVID-19: Physiopathologie d’une maladie à plusieurs visages. La Revue de Médecine Interne, 41, 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2020.05.003Rouamba, T., Barry, H., Ouédraogo, E., Tahita, M.C., Yaméogo, N.V., Poda, A., et al. (2021) Safety of Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine plus Azithromycin for the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients in Burkina Faso: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 17, 1187-1198. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S330813Zhang, X.-Y., Lv, L., Zhou, Y.-L., Xie, L.-D., Xu, Q., Zou, X.-F., et al. (2021) Efficacy and Safety of Xiyanping Injection in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label and Randomized Controlled Trial. Phytotherapy Research, 35, 4401-4410. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7141Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. (2014) Médecine traditionnelle. Rapport du Secrétariat, Report No. A67/26. OMS, 6.Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (2021) Médecine traditionnelle et complémentaire. Report No. WPR/RC72/6. OMS, Geneva, 6.WHO (2020) WHO, Africa CDC Push for COVID-19 Traditional Medicine Research in Africa.https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-africa-cdc-push-for-covid-19-traditional-medicine-research-in-africaAlam, S., Sarker, M.M.R., Afrin, S., Richi, F.T., Zhao, C., Zhou, J.-R., et al. (2021). Traditional Herbal Medicines, Bioactive Metabolites, and Plant Products against COVID-19: Update on Clinical Trials and Mechanism of Actions. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, Article 671498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.671498Ren, W., Ma, Y., Wang, R., Liang, P., Sun, Q., Pu, Q., et al. (2021) Research Advance on Qingfei Paidu Decoction in Prescription Principle, Mechanism Analysis and Clinical Application. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, Article 589714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.589714Shah, T., Shah, Z., Xia, K.-Y. and Baloch, Z. (2022) Therapeutic Mechanisms and Impact of Traditional Chinese Medicine on COVID-19 and Other Influenza Diseases. Pharmacological Research—Modern Chinese Medicine, 2, Article ID: 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prmcm.2021.100029Wen, J., Wang, R., Liu, H., Tong, Y., Wei, S., Zhou, X., et al. (2020) Potential Therapeutic Effect of Qingwen Baidu Decoction against Corona Virus Disease 2019: A Mini Review. Chinese Medicine, 15, Article No. 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-020-00332-yAbou Zeid, A.H., Hifnawy, M.S. and Mohammed, R.S. (2009) Phenolic Compounds and Biological Activities of Dichrostachys cinerea L. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science and Biotechnology, 3, 42-49.Vijayalakshmi, M., Periyanayagam, K. and Lakshmana, P.S. (2010) Invitro Antilice Activity of Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2, 2210-2213.Neondo, J.O., Mbithe, C.M., Njenga, P.K. and Muthuri, C.W. (2012) Phytochemical Characterization, Antibacterial Screening and Toxicity Evaluation of Dichrostachys Cinerea. International Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 1, 32-37.El-Sharawy, R.T., Elkhateeb, A., Marzouk, M.M., Abd El-Latif, R.R., Abdelrazig, S.E. and El-Ansari, M.A. (2017) Antiviral and Antiparasitic Activities of Clovamide: The Major Constituent of Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight et Arn. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 7, 219-223.Agrawal, P.K., Agrawal, C. and Blunden, G. (2020) Quercetin: Antiviral Significance and Possible COVID-19 Integrative Considerations. Natural Product Communications, 15, Article ID: 1934578X2097629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X20976293Al-Shuhaib, M.B.S., Hashim, H.O. and Al-Shuhaib, J.M.B.(2022) Epicatechin Is a Promising Novel Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Disrupting Interactions Between Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Type 2 and the Viral Receptor Binding Domain: A Computational/Simulation Study. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 141, Article ID: 105155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105155Diniz, L.R.L., Elshabrawy, H.A., de Santana Souza, M.T., Duarte, A.B.S., Datta, S. and de Sousa, D.P. (2021) Catechins: Therapeutic Perspectives in COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. Molecules, 26, Article No. 5951. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195951Liskova, A., Samec, M., Koklesova, L., Samuel, S.M., Zhai, K., Al-Ishaq, R.K., et al. (2021) Flavonoids against the SARS-CoV-2 Induced Inflammatory Storm. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 138, Article ID: 111430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111430Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.Meo, S.A., Klonoff, D.C. and Akram, J. (2020) Efficacy of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 24, 4539-4547.Deeks, J.J., Dinnes, J., Takwoingi, Y., Davenport, C., Spijker, R., Taylor-Phillips, S., et al. (2020) Antibody Tests for Identification of Current and Past Infection with SARS-CoV-2. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 6, Article No. CD013652. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013652Liang, S.-B., Zhang, Y.-Y., Shen, C., Liang, C.-H., Lai, B.-Y., Dai, N., et al. (2021) Chinese Herbal Medicine Used with or without Conventional Western Therapy for COVID-19: An Evidence Review of Clinical Studies. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11, Article 583450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.583450Rabier, V., Dubée, V., Abgueguen, P., Mahieux, R., Delbos, V., Fialaire, P., et al. (2020) Réévaluation à distance de la symptomatologie des patients atteints de forme légère à modérée de COVID-19. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 50, S79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.06.156Babu, P.S., Krishna, V., Maruthi, K., Shankarmurthy, K. and Babu, R. (2011) E Evaluation of Acute Toxicity and Hepatoprotective Activity of the Methanolic Extract of Dichrostachys Cinerea (Wight and Arn.) Leaves. Pharmacognosy Research, 3, 40-43. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.79114Kothari, S.C., Shivarudraiah, P., Venkataramaiah, S.B., Gavara, S., Arumugam, S.N. and Soni, M.G. (2014) Toxicologic Evaluation of Dichrostachys glomerata Extract: Subchronic Study in Rats and Genotoxicity Tests. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 69, 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.03.045Kullar, R., Patel, A.P. and Saab, S. (2020) Hepatic Injury in Patients with COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 54, 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001432Guan, W., Ni, Z., Hu, Y., Liang, W., Ou, C., He, J., et al. (2020) Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Wang, X., Luo, N. and Li, L. (2020) Clinical Outcomes in 55 Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Who Were Asymptomatic at Hospital Admission in Shenzhen, China. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 221, 1770-1774. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa119Bénézit, F., Armange, L., Picard, L., Paz, D.L., Pronier, C., Patrat-Delon, S., et al. (2020) Histoire naturelle de la COVID-19 avec suivi prospectif systématique standardisé: Combien de temps durent les symptômes? Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 50, S79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.06.157Liu, B., Jayasundara, D., Pye, V., Dobbins, T., Dore, G.J., Matthews, G., et al. (2021) Whole of Population-Based Cohort Study of Recovery Time from COVID-19 in New South Wales Australia. The Lancet Regional Health—Western Pacific, 12, Article ID: 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100193Abou Zeid, A.H., Hifnawy, M.S., Mohammed, R.S. and Sleem, A.A. (2015) Lipoidal Contents, Analgesic and Antipyretic Activities of the Aerial Parts of Dichrostachys cinerea L. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, 21, 118-128.https://doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2014.920459Irié-N’guessan, G., et al. (2011) Tracheal Relaxation of Five Ivorian Anti-Asthmatic Plants: Role of Epithelium and K+ Channels in the Effect of the Aqueous-Alcoholic Extract of Dichrostachys cinerea Root Bark. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 138, 432-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.09.016Kuate, D., Etoundi, B.C., Ngondi, J.L., Muda, W. and Oben, J.E. (2013) Anti-Inflammatory, Anthropometric and Lipomodulatory Effects Dyglomera® (Aqueous Extract of Dichrostachys glomerata) in Obese Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Functional Foods in Health and Disease, 3, 416-427. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v3i11.35Cao, B., Wang, Y., Wen, D., Liu, W., Wang, J., Fan, G., et al. (2020) A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 1787-99. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001282Wang, Y., Lu, C., Li, H., Qi, W., Ruan, L., Bian, Y., et al. (2021) Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Severe COVID-19 Patients with Chinese Medicine: A Retrospective Case Series Study at Early Stage of the COVID-19 Epidemic in Wuhan, China. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 277, Article ID: 113888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.113888Kudi, A.C. and Myint, S.H. (1999) Antiviral Activity of Some Nigerian Medicinal Plant Extracts. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 68, 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00049-5Khazdair, M.R., Anaeigoudari, A. and Agbor, G.A. (2021) Anti-Viral and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Kaempferol and Quercetin and COVID-2019: A Scoping Review. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 11, 327-334. https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-1691.319567Farhat, A., Ben Hlima, H., Khemakhem, B., Ben Halima, Y., Michaud, P., Abdelkafi, S., et al. (2022) Apigenin Analogues as SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors: In-Silico Screening Approach. Bioengineered, 13, 3350-3361. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2027181