<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Soil Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5360</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojss.2023.136011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJSS-125943</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Molecular Identification of Isolated Bacteria from Soils in Likouala Peat Bog Area, Republic of Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gatse</surname><given-names>Elgie Viennechie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mboukou</surname><given-names>Kimbatsa Irène Marie Cécile</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morabandza</surname><given-names>Cyr Jonas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mfoutou</surname><given-names>Mampanguy Claujeans Chastel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ifo</surname><given-names>Suspens Averti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nguimbi</surname><given-names>Etienne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Université Marien NGOUABI, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Unit, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Teledetection and Eorest Ecology Laboratory, ENS, Université Marien NGOUABI, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, ENS, Université Marien NGOUABI, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>274</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study aimed to the molecular identification of isolated bacteria from the soils of Likouala (Congo-Brazzaville) peat bog area. Counting and isolation were carried out on Mossel and TSB media enriched with petroleum and vegetable oil; the amplification and sequencing of 16S RNA genes by PCR and Artic Oxford Nanopore Technology. The results showed bacterial loads of (5.81 &#177; 1.08) &#215; 10
  <sup>4</sup>; (6.64 &#177; 1.94) &#215; 10
  <sup>4</sup> et (8.56 &#177; 1.19) &#215; 10
  <sup>3</sup> CFU/g on Mossel respectively for samples 1, 2 and 3 against (2.12 &#177; 4.1) &#215; 10
  <sup>8</sup> et (8.15 &#177; 10.1) &#215; 10
  <sup>7</sup> CFU/g respectively on TSB enriched with petroleum and vegetable oil exclusively with sample 2. The analysis of the 16S rRNA of the isolates gene made it possible, after PCR, agarose gel electrophoresis, sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, to identify eight (08) strains with similarities of 99 to 100% whose sequences genes placed in GenBank have made it possible to obtain accession numbers corresponding to: 
  <em>Bacillus thuringiensis strain</em> (ON303633); 
  <em>Bacillus cereus strain</em> (ON350770); 
  <em>Bacillus thuringiensis strain</em> (ON350771); 
  <em>Bacillus thuringiensis strain</em> (ON738723); 
  <em>Priestia megaterium strain</em> (ON738719); 
  <em>Bacillus anthracis strain</em> (ON738720); 
  <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> (ON738721); 
  <em>Enterobacter sp</em> (ON738722). The phylogenetic classification of strains was done and revealed two genuses which are Bacillus and Enterobacteriaceae.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bacteria</kwd><kwd> Peat Bog Area</kwd><kwd> PCR</kwd><kwd> Sequencing</kwd><kwd> 16S rRNA</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The research of microorganisms in peatlands has been of increasing interest in the last five years, with the aim of understanding their influence in the functioning and stability of peatlands and the interaction between microbial activities and the effects of climate change. Several studies carried out on the role of peatlands in the global carbon cycle in the face of global warming show a rise in temperatures leading to a strong degradation of organic matter following an increase in microbial activity, resulting in a significant release of CO<sub>2</sub> and carbon fixation by photosynthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref1">1</xref>] . Microflora studies have revealed the presence of high amounts of molds in the peat with concentrations of molds close to 107 per gram of dry peat; up to 23 species of yeasts belonging to the genera Trichosporon, Candida, Rhodotorula and others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref2">2</xref>] , and other species of pathogenic mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium fortuitum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref3">3</xref>] . Although the study of the diversity of microorganisms in peatlands is the subject of growing interest, the processes maintaining this diversity and its role in the functioning and stability of peatlands remain to date very little explored. This lack of knowledge is even greater if we consider the interaction between the effect of diversity and the effects of climate change [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref4">4</xref>] . Indeed, despite advances in knowledge of current carbon storage, there are still considerable knowledge gaps on the microbiology of these ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref5">5</xref>] . The best understanding lies mainly in the ability to better characterize communities of microorganisms both at the taxonomic and functional level. To date, in the Republic of Congo, no identification of microbial strains has been carried out on the microorganisms of the peat soils of Likouala. In order to assess the evolution of its quality and its impact on the environment, we proposed to identify after having characterized the bacteria contained in the soils of the Likouala peat bog area.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>The biological materials used in this study were three (3) composite soil samples collected in the Likouala peat bog area. A total of 9 soil samples collected. We used the samples collected according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref6">6</xref>] . After collection of soils samples, all the samples were transferred to a molecular microbiology Laboratory for analyses.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Enumeration and Isolation</title><p>The samples were cultured on Mossel media and TSB enriched with petroleum and vegetable oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref8">8</xref>] . After culture, the colonies were purified on Mossel and TSB enriched. A colony is removed using a loop or Pasteur pipette using the striation technique to obtain isolated colonies. The dishes were incubated in an oven at 37˚C, and then observed after 24 h. The isolates were considered pure and then stored in sterile Eppendorf tubes containing 900 &#181;l of liquid TBS and 100 &#181;l of glycerol, then kept cool at −20˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Phenotypic Characterization of Isolates</title><p>The phenotypic characterization of the strains was carried out by applying classic microbiology techniques based on the search for phenotypic characters: cultural characters, morphological characters (colony and cell morphology), Gram type and catalase production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Molecular Identification</title><p>1) DNA extraction</p><p>The extraction was done using the Qiagen kit whose execution was carried out as indicated by the manufacturer.</p><p>2) Evaluation of DNA concentration</p><p>DNA concentration and purity were measured using a Biorad spectrophotometer, using the A 260/A280 ratio to assess protein contamination in the DNA solution DNA electrophoresis was performed on 1% agarose gel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>3) PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene</p><p>a) Primers design</p><p>Universal primers were used to amplify genes encoding 1500 bp ribosomal RNA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref12">12</xref>] . See in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>b) Mix and PCR conditions</p><p>The PCR reaction was carried out in a final volume of 50 μL according to the conditions in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. 1 μL for each primer and 5 μLfor the buffer, all concentrations of all PCR mix are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The PCR amplification was carried out in a Thermocycler as follows: first</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Universal primers for amplification of 16S RNA</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Primer</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nucleotidic sequence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Primer Size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >fD 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >(1500 pb)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rP 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5’-ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> PCR reaction mix</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Components</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial concentration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Final concentration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reaction volume (μL)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Buffer taq</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10&#215;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25&#215;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 Μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 μM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primer R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 Μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 μM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >d NTP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 Μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25&#215;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taq polymerase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 U/Μl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Final volume of reaction 50 μL</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>initial denaturation at 95˚C for 5 min; 30 cycles for each of the following steps; denaturation at 95˚C for 30 seconds; Hybridization was carried out at 55˚C for 30 seconds; elongation at 72˚C for 1 min 30 s, and a final elongation at 72˚C for 5 min, followed by storage of the PCR fragments (amplicons) at 4˚C.</p><p>c) DNA Electrophoresis and Sequencing</p><p>DNA electrophoresis was performed on 1% agarose gel using TBE buffer DNA was revealed with Syber green then visualized using a computer combined with a band visualization device of the Gel Doc EZ imager type (UV device). The size of the DNA amplicon is estimated using a molecular weight marker. For sequencing, the sequence library was prepared according to the Oxford Nanopore Technology protocol. Sequences were purified with the AMpurex kit, then quantified using the spectrophotometer, normalized, coded, and sequenced using the GRiDION Oxford Nanopore tool.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_4"><title>2.2.4. Results Analysis</title><p>The results were represented, illustrated and statistically analyzed by Microsoft Excel 2016 software. For the Bioinformatics analysis, all the sequences were the subject of an in-silico study in BLASTn which revealed allowed us to identify the eight sequences and two homologues from the bank. The comparison of the partial nucleotide sequences of the gene encoding 16S rRNA using the GenBank portal by alignment allowed us to obtain identification rates that vary from 96.75 to 100%. Using percentage of similarity, E value, ten sequences were aligned with ClustalW and we the inference phylogenetic tree was performed with PhyML [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref8">8</xref>] . The eight new sequences were definitely submitted to GenBank.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Enumeration</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the bacterial loads of samples 1, 2 and 3 on Mossel medium. The total load of bacteria of the Bacillus genus depends on the sample. Samples 1 and 2 present loads of (5.81 &#177; 1.08) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> and (6.64 &#177; 1.94) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/g respectively against the load of sample 3 where it is (8.56 &#177; 1.19) &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/g.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> presents the bacterial loads on TSB medium enriched with petroleum</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Loads (CFU/g) of bacteria of the Bacillus genus in the samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mossel medium</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5.81 &#177; 1.08) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup><sup> </sup>CFU/g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(6.64 &#177; 1.94) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(8.56 &#177; 1.19) &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/g</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Loads (CFU/g) of hydrocarbonoclasts bacteria of sample 2</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TSB + petrol</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TSB + vegetable oil</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2.12 &#177; 4.1) &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(8.15 &#177; 10.1) &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/g</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>and vegetable oil mainly with the sample 2 because of its load on Mossel medium. The bacterial load is higher with the TSB medium enriched with petroleum with (2.12 &#177; 4.1) &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g against (8.15 &#177; 10.1) &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/g with the TSB medium enriched with vegetable oil.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Isolation and Characterization</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows the phenotypic characteristics of the sequenced strains. Microscopic examination reveals the rod-shaped bacteria, the majority of which were Gram positive (Gram+) and catalase positive. These 10 isolates were selected and identified by molecular biology.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Molecular Identification by 16S rDNA Analysis</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Extracted DNA Concentrations</title><p>After extraction of the genomic DNA, the concentration and purity of the extracts were evaluated using the spectrophotometer. DNA purity is acceptable when the A260nm/A280nm ratio is between 1.8 and 2.0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref13">13</xref>] . If R is less than 1.8, contaminating proteins are probably available in the solution. A value greater than 2 indicates probable RNA contamination. The A 260nm/280nm ratio varies from 1.86 to 2.09 and varies from one DNA extract to another, because it depends on the sequence composition. The resulting results are in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Extracted DNA Electrophoresis</title><p>After extraction and quantification of DNA extracts, electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel. was made. Of the 10 isolates, 9 bands were observed and one band was not observed. These results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Electrophoresis of PCR Fragments</title><p>The identification of the isolates, by amplification of the purified 16S gene revealed by DNA bands of approximately 1500 bp as indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Phenotypic characteristics of the isolates</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Isolates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Appearance, Color and Consistency of Colonies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >shape</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arrangement</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mobility</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gram</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Catalase</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, flat Pink, dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, flat Pink, dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, flat Pink, dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, white, dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, yellow, creamy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, yellow, dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, greyish, creamy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, yellow, creamy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, white, creamy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coccobacillus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circular, yellow, dry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> DNA concentration and purity after extraction</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DNA concentration(μg/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DNA purity (A260/A280)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Bioinformatics Analysis of 16S rRNA Sequences</title><p>The identification of the different isolates by 16S rDNA sequencing made it possible to differentiate the genus and the species of the isolates. A total of 10 sequences corresponding to the ten isolates were identified, eight of which could be submitted to GenBank. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> indicates the various sequences and corresponding isolates.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Correspondence of isolate codes and strains identified by 16S rRNA</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Identified strains</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >new accessions numbers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus thuringiensis strain GEB22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON303633</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus cereus strain GE2B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON350770</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RE 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus thuringiensis strain GE3B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON350771</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus thuringiensis strain GE4B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON738723</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus sp GE5B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus sp GE6B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Priestia megaterium strain GE7B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON738723</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus anthracis strain GE8B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON738720</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus subtilis strain GE9B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON738721</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bv 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Enterobacter sp GE10B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ON738722</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Multiple Sequence Alignment of Identified Strains with Some GenBank Homologs</title><p>The sequences of the identified strains were aligned in order to analyze the distance and the rate of similarity between strains and to understand the events that occurred during evolution. Similarly, these analyzes make it possible to test the efficiency of the 16S rRNA gene to discriminate between strains sharing a similar polymorphism. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> illustrates the multiple alignment of the studied sequences and their homologs. A strong sequence similarity was observed between the three strains of B. thuringiensis (GEB22, GE3B22 and GE4B22) and the homologous strain B. thuringiensis (B.t10). This observation is the same between the two strains of P. megaterium (GE7B22 and zs-3); the two strains of B. subtilis (GE9B22 and MK736123); the two strains of Entobacter and between the strains of B. cereus; B. anthracis.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_6"><title>3.3.6. Phylogenetic Inference</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the dendrogram of the sequences of the identified strains and their homologs obtained from GenBank. The resulting phylogenetic tree is divided into two clusters; Enterobacteriaceae species on the one hand and Bacillus species on the other. The species composing each cluster have a strong similarity between them.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This work aimed to the molecular identification of bacteria isolated from samples soil of the Likouala peat bog area (Congo-Brazzaville). Counting the bacteria on Mossel medium reveals bacterial loads of (5.81 &#177; 1.08) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> and (6.64 &#177; 1.94) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/g for samples 1 and 2 respectively. Whereas, sample 3 presented a load of (8.56 &#177; 1.19) &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> CFU/g (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The count of sample 2 on the TSB medium, enriched with petroleum and vegetable oil, shows higher bacterial loads than on the Mossel medium. Indeed, on the TSB medium enriched with</p><p>petroleum, the bacterial load is (2.12 &#177; 4.1) &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g and (8.15 &#177; 10.1) &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/g on the same medium enriched with vegetable oil. These results suggest that the total load of bacteria of the genus Bacillus and hydrocarbonoclasts is a function of the sample, the medium and in varying concentrations of the used source of carbon. These results are close to those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref14">14</xref>] with samples soil of Brazzaville where the bacterial load after counting was around 9.3 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/g. The microscopic and macroscopic examinations made it possible to distinguish variable characteristics. Two forms of bacteria were characterized: cocci and rods which were more abundant, mostly gram positive (Gram+) and catalase positive thus suggesting bacteria of the genus Bacillus. These results corroborate those of several studies which have already shown that bacteria of the Bacillus genus can be isolated from food and soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref16">16</xref>] . In order to carry out the molecular identification of bacteria isolated from peat bog soils; we ensured the efficiency of DNA amplification by different PCR reactions allowing to amplify different fragments up to 1500 bp. The 260/280 ratio was determined, which made it possible to detect contamination of the nucleic acids by proteins. Its value varied between 1.8 and 2.0 for DNA and between 2.0 and 2.2 for RNA. The A260nm/A280nm ratio varied from one fragment to another, respectively from 1.74 to 1.88 because it depends on the sequence composition, these results are in accordance with the statement of Jay A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref13">13</xref>] . Most sequences showed 99% similarity to the closest sequences already presented in NCBI databases. The more significant the alignment score, the results are expressed as a percentage of similarity of the strains identified for our study with the closest species with regard to the intervals. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> the bloc from 841 to 854 is showing the conserved region of ADNr16S, all identified sequences and homologs present a highly this conserved region. This evidence corroborates the postulate in which all procaryotes specially bacteria can be identified by the sequencing of the conserved region of ADNr16S. Authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref17">17</xref>] have already found the same results. When watching the bloc [855 - 861] of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> the two sequences of Enterobacter sp are different from those of all Bacillus strains. Phylogenetic Inference has confirmed the phylogeny of reference which is well established between the Bacillus strains and the Enterobacter sp strains. The phylogenetic tree dispays two monophyletic groups, these results have been already found by others authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>PCR amplification and then sequencing of the gene encoding rRNA 16S identified eight (08) species of bacteria including three (3) species of Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus cereus, Priestia megaterium, Bacillus antracis, and Bacillus subtilis and one species Enterobacter sp., isolate whose species could not be determined because of the low rate of similarity, this observation has already been made by other auhors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.125943-ref8">8</xref>] . The association of other more discriminating molecular markers in addition to the gene encoding 16S rRNA is possible in the future in order to assess the microbial biodiversity colonizing peatland ecosystems.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study contributes to the molecular identification of bacteria isolated in soil samples constituting the surface part of the peat bog in the Likouala area in the Republic of Congo. The results of the microbiological analyses of this present study showed that the soils of the peat bogs of the Likouala zone are rich in bacteria of the Bacillus genus. PCR amplification, followed by sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene allowed the identification of eight (8) species of bacteria including six (6) of the Bacillus genus: Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus cereus Bacillus thuringiensis; Bacillus thuringiensis; Bacillus anthracis; Bacillus subtilis; a strain of Enterobacter sp and a strain of Priestia megaterium. This present work constitutes a scientific support in the study, the understanding and the interaction of the bacterial diversity colonizing the soils of the peat bogs in the Republic of Congo.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We were grateful to the members of the molecular and cellular biology Laboratory of the Faculty of Sciences and Techniques for providing used laboratory materials.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Viennechie, G.E., C&#233;cile, M.K.I.M., Jonas, M.C., Chastel, M.M.C., Averti, I.S. and Etienne, N. (2023) Molecular Identification of Isolated Bacteria from Soils in Likouala Peat Bog Area, Republic of Congo. Open Journal of Soil Science, 13, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2023.136011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.125943-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fatima, L.D. and Francis, M. (2008) Les tourbières et leur role de stockage de carbone face aux changements climatiques. Zones Humides Info, 59-60, 22-24. 
https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00321655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poliakova, A.V., Chernov, I. and Panikoc, N.S. (2001) Yeast Biodiversity in Hydromorphic Soils with Reference to Grass-Sphagnum Swamp in Western Siberia and the Hammocky Tundra Region. Mikrobiologia, 70, 714-720.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown-Elliott, B. and Wallace, J. (2002) Clinical and Taxonomic Status of Pathogenic Nonpigmented or Late-Pigmenting Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 15, 716-746. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.4.716-746.2002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joosten, H., Tapio-Bistrom, M.L. and Tol, S. (2012) Peatlands: Guidance for Climate Change Mitigation through Conservation, Rehabilitation and Sustainable Use. 2nd Edition, Mitigation of Climate Change in Agriculture Series 5, FAO &amp; Wetlands International, 101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dorrepaal, E., Toet, S., van Loegtestijn, R.S.P., Swart, E., van de Weg, M.J., Callaghan, T.V. and Aerts, R. (2009) Carbon Respiration from Subsurface Peat Accelerated by Climate Warming in the Subarctic. Nature, 460, 616-619.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jonas, M.C., Viennechie, G.E., Cecile, M.K.I.M., Samuel, O.I., Averti, I.S. and Etienne, N. (2022) Characterization of Isolated Bacteria from Soils in the Likouala Peat Bog Area (Republic of Congo). American Journal of Microbiological Research, 10, 59-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, K. (2005) Etude de la qualité Physico-Chimique et bactériologique des puits de certains quartiers du district de Bamako. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soloka, M.F.A., Nguimbi, E., Kayath, A.C. and Ahombo, G. (2020) Molecular Charactrisation of Bacillus-Genus Bacteria with Fibrinolytic Potential Isolated from Squashes &amp;#171; NTETE &amp;#187; Brazzaville in the Republic of Congo. Amicain Journal of Microbiolocal Research, 8, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmr-8-1-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngo, I., Nguimbi, E., Kayath, C. and Ampa, R. (2019) Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Classification and Proteolytic Capacity of cultivable Bacteria Isolated from Soils in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. Journal of Biochemestry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 7, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Vos, P., Garrity, G.M., Jones, D., Krieg, N.R., Ludwig, W., Rainey, F. and Whitman, W.B. (2009) Bergey’s Manuel of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Edition, Vol. 3, The Firmicutes. Springer, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahou, A., Homrani, A. and Medjahed, F.B.M. (2015) La microflore lactique d’un fromage traditionnel Algérien &amp;#171; type j’ ben &amp;#187;: Connaissance des écosystèmes microbiens laitiers locaux et de leurs roles dans la fabrication des fromages. Afrique Science, 11, 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weisberg, W.G., Barns, S.M., Pelletier, D.A. and Lane, D.J. (1991) 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. Journal of Bacteriology, 173, 697-703.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jay</surname><given-names> A.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Validity of Nucleic Acid Purities Monitored by 260nm/280nm Absorbance Ratios</article-title><source> Bio Techniques</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 62</fpage>-<lpage>63</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onyankouang, I., Morabandza, C.J., Kimbatsa, I.M.C.M., Mabika, F.A.S., Ng&amp;ocirc, I., Lingouangou, T.M., Moyen, R. and Nguimbi, E. (2022) Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Proteolytic Bacteria Isolated from Fermented Pepper and Soil in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 7, 124-134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bravo, A., Gómez, I., Porta, H., García-Gómez, I.B., Rodriguez-Almazan, C., Pardo, L. and Soberón, M. (2013) Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry Toxins Insecticidal Activity. Microbial Biotechnology, 6, 17-26.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00342.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fanfani, G. (2014) Les bactéries du groupe de Bacillus cereus dans les conserves à pH peu acide (petit pois); détection, caractérisation par méthode probabiliste numérisée, moléculaire et anti-bio résistance. Master’s Thesis, université badji Mokhtar Annaba, Annaba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etienne, N., Armel, S.M.F., Valentin, D., Eckzechel, N.S.A., Christian, K.A. and Rachel, M. (2021) New Phylogenetic Molecular Markers in Bacteria of the Genus Bacillus: Fibrinolytic Proteases. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 6, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmb.20210603.14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Helgason, E., Caugant, D.A., Lecadet, M.M., Chen, Y., Mahillon, J., Lovgreen, A., Hegna, I., Kvaloy, K. and Kolsto, A.B. (1998) Genetic Diversity of Bacillus cereus/Bacillus thuringiensis Isolates from Natural Sources. Current Microbiology, 37, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002849900343</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.125943-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, M.L. and Tsen, H.Y. (2002) Discrimination of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis with 16S rRNA and gyrB Gene Based PCR Primers and Sequencing of Their Annealing Sites. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 912-919.  
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01606.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>